DOCSLIB.ORG

Renewable Energy Project Listing – March 20, 2014 Green Has Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renewable Energy Project Listing – March 20, 2014 Green Has Their Renewable Energy Project Listing – March 20, 2014 Green has their Renewable Energy Approval Yellow is Under Technical Review Red are Returned/Incomplete/Withdrawn Blue are received and being screened for completeness Note: projects not listed here have not submitted an REA application Type County, District or Region Project Information Status Wind Huron County Name: Westerhout Enterprises Wind Facility Proponent: Westerhout Enterprises REA Application Status: Approved Wind Huron County Name: Westerhout Poultry Inc. Wind Facility Proponent: Westerhout Poultry REA Application Status: Approved Wind Chatham-Kent County Name: Kent Breeze Corp. Wind Farms Proponent: Kent Breeze Corp. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Wellington County Name: Ryerson University Wind Facility Proponent: Ryerson University REA Application Status: Approved Wind Elgin County Name: Elgin Grovlea Farms Inc's Wind Farm Proponent: Elgin Grovelea Farms REA Application Status: Approved Wind Halton Region Name: Wal-Mart Canada Corp. Wind Turbine Proponent: Wal-Mart Canada REA Application Status: Approved Wind Lambton County Name: Zephyr Farms Limited's Brooke-Alvinston Wind Farm Proponent: Zephyr Farms Limited REA Application Status: Approved Wind Hamilton Name: Mohawk College's Fennell Campus Wind Project Proponent: Mohawk College REA Application Status: Approved Wind Wellington County Name: Conestogo Wind Energy Centre Proponent: NextEra Energy Canada REA Application Status: Approved Wind Chatham-Kent County Name: Gesner Wind Energy Project Proponent: Saturn Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Haldimand County Name: Summerhaven Wind Energy Centre Proponent: Summerhaven Wind, LP REA Application Status: Approved Wind Chatham-Kent County Name: South Kent Wind Project Proponent: South Kent Wind LP (also Samsung Renewable) REA Application Status: Approved Wind Haldimand County Name: Grand Renewable Energy Park - Wind Component Proponent: Grand Renewable Wind LP (also Samsung Renewable) REA Application Status: Approved Wind Haldimand County Name: Port Dover Nanticoke Wind Farm Proponent: Capital Power GP Holdings Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Wellington County Name: Springwood Wind Farm Project Proponent: wpd Springwood Wind Incorporated REA Application Status: Approved Wind District of Manitoulin Name: McLean's Mountain Wind Limited Partnership Wind Farm Proponent: McLean's Mountain Wind LP also Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Prince Edward County Name: Ostrander Point Wind Energy Park Proponent: Ostrander Point GP Inc., as general partner for and on behalf of Ostrander Point Wind Energy LP REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Dufferin Name: Whittington Wind Farm Project Proponent: wpd Canada Corporation REA Application Status: Approved Wind Toronto Region Name: C.J. Graphics Inc. Proponent: C.J. Graphics Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Huron County Name: Bluewater Wind Project Proponent: NextEra Energy Canada REA Application Status: Approved Wind Middlesex County Name: Bornish Wind Energy Centre Proponent: Bornish Wind LP REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Dufferin Name: Dufferin Wind Farm Proponent: Dufferin Wind Power Inc REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Essex Name: Oxley Wind Farm Proponent: Oxley Wind Farm REA Application Status: Approved Wind Regional Municipality of Name: HAF Wind Power Project Niagara Proponent: Vineland Power Inc. (IPC Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Wind Huron County Name: St. Columban Wind Farm Proponent: St. Columban Energy LP REA Application Status: Approved Wind Stormont, Dundas & Name: South Branch Wind Farm Glengarry County Proponent: South Branch Wind Farm Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Huron County Name: K2 Wind Farm Proponent: K2 Wind Ontario Inc. operating as K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership REA Application Status: Approved Wind Middlesex County Name: Adelaide Wind Energy Centre Proponent: Kerwood Wind Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Lennox and Name: Ernestown Wind Farm Addington Proponent: Ernestown Windpark Inc. operating as Ernestown Windpark Limited Partnership REA Application Status: Approved Wind District of Algoma Name: Goulais Wind Farm Proponent: SP Development Limited Partnership (Sprott) REA Application Status: Approved Wind Regional Municipality of Name: Wainfleet Wind Farm Niagara Proponent: Wainfleet Wind Engery Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Bruce Name: Armow Wind Project Proponent: SP Armow Wind Ontario GP Inc. operating as SP Armow Wind Ontario LP REA Application Status: Approved Wind Middlesex County Name: Napier Wind Project Proponent: wpd Napier Wind Incorporated REA Application Status: Approved Wind Kawartha Lakes County Name: Sumac Ridge Wind Farm Project Proponent: Wpd Canada Corporation REA Application Status: Approved Wind Middlesex County Name: Suncor Energy Adelaide Wind Power Project Proponent: Suncor Energy Products Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Wind District of Algoma Name: Bow Lake Wind Farm Proponent: Nodin Kitagan Limited Partnership and Nodin Kitagan 2 Limited Partnership (BlueEarth Renewables & Batchewana FN) REA Application Status: Approved Wind County of Grey Name: East Durham Wind Energy Centre Proponent: East Durham Wind Inc. (NextEra) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Lambton County Name: St. Clair Moore Solar Farm Proponent: First Solar Development (Canada), Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Lambton County Name: St. Clair Sombra Solar Farm Proponent: First Solar Development (Canada), Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Stormont, Dundas & Name: SunE Rutley Solar Farm Glengarry County Proponent: SunE Rutley GP Corp REA Application Status: Approved Solar Stormont, Dundas & Name: South Glengarry Solar Project Glengarry County Proponent: Penn Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Lanark County Name: RE Smiths Falls 5 Proponent: Smiths Falls 5 (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Stormont, Dundas & Name: William Rutely Solar Project Glengarry County Proponent: Tempest Power Corporation (also Canadian Solar) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: RE Smiths Falls 6 Proponent: Smiths Falls 6 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Waubaushene 4 Proponent: Waubaushene 4 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Waubaushene 5 Proponent: Waubaushene 5 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Midhurst 6 Proponent: Midhurst 6 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: Crosby Solar Farm Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Orillia 2 Proponent: Orillia 2 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar County of Essex Name: Amherstburg Solar Farm Proponent: First Solar Development REA Application Status: Approved Solar Haldimand County Name: Walpole Solar Farm Proponent: First Solar Development (Canada), Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Elgin County Name: Beaver Creek Solar Farm Proponent: Injasuti Developments REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: Rideau Lakes Solar Farm Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Parry Sound District Name: Burk's Falls East Solar Project Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Lanark County Name: RE Smiths Falls 2 Proponent: Smiths Falls 2 ULC (Also Known as Recurrent Energy) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: Brockville Solar Project (2176047 Ontario Inc) Proponent: Canadian Solar Solutions Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: McCann Solar Project Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Prince Edward County Name: Belleville North Solar Project Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Prince Edward County Name: Belleville South Solar Project Proponent: Northland Power Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Elgin County & Middlesex Name: Belmont Solar Farm County Proponent: First Solar Development REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: Brockville Solar Farm Proponent: Brockville Solar Inc. REA Application Status: Approved Solar Elgin County Name: Flowerburn Solar Farm Proponent: Injasuti Developments REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: Edwardsburgh Morrisburg Solar Project Proponent: Penn Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Northumberland County Name: Hamilton (Port Hope 4) Solar Facility Proponent: Penn Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Lanark County Name: RE Smiths Falls 3 Proponent: Recurrent Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Leeds & Grenville County Name: RE Smiths Falls 1 Proponent: Recurrent Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Waubaushene 3 Proponent: Recurrent Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Norfolk County Name: Norfolk-Bloomsburg TS Solar Project Proponent: 2225050 Ontario Inc. (c/o Axio Power) REA Application Status: Approved Solar Middlesex County Name: RE Breen 2 Proponent: Recurrent Energy REA Application Status: Approved Solar Simcoe County Name: RE Orillia 1 Proponent: Recurrent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Document.Pdf
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Investment Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of the property known as Smokey Trail Apartments (510 Smokey Trail Drive) located in Limon, CO (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. However, the Seller makes no representations or warranties herein and the building is being sold in an “as is, where-is” condition. By receipt of this Memorandum, you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit or disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. or seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extracting any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire. Certain documents, including leases and other materials, are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the full agreements. Interested parties are expected to review all such documents independently. Financial projections are provided for reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado
    Enbridge’s economic impact on Colorado Enbridge, a North American energy These activities deliver a variety As the world’s population grows, delivery leader, was established of economic benefits to multiple we’ll need all forms of energy—crude in 1949 and exists to fuel people’s American states—and these aspects oil, natural gas, renewables—to meet quality of life. of our operations also fuel people’s rising global energy demand. As a quality of life, whether they’re: company with both pipelines and wind We move a very large slice of turbines, Enbridge is delivering energy North America’s oil, natural gas and • well-paying jobs in towns and cities; security and driving transformation natural gas liquids, safely and reliably. • tax revenue that can help build toward a lower-carbon economy. We operate North America’s premium schools, hospitals and roads; natural gas transmission franchise, • procurement spending that We’re proud to deliver economic crude oil and liquids pipeline business, stimulates local economies; or benefits in the states where we and natural gas utility business. • grants and volunteer labor for do business. community-strengthening projects. 1 Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Athabasca Fort McMurray Cheecham Kirby Lake Edmonton Hardisty Kerrobert Calgary Vancouver Regina Lethbridge Cromer Seattle Fredericton Rowatt Gretna Halifax Clearbrook Montreal Minot Superior Bualo Edgar Toronto Boston Westover Sarnia Dawn Bualo Energy assets, Casper Stockbridge New York operations and projects Chatham Leidy Guernsey Oakford Channahon Philadelphia Enbridge’s operations, projects, Gurley Toledo and/or asset ownership interests Flanagan Chicago Steckman in Colorado include: • DCP Midstream natural gas gathering Ridge lines and processing facilities in the Salisbury Accident Denver/Fort Collins, Grand Junction and Denver Kit Carson areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay
    Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay June 2020 Prepared by: Emma House, Zach Roy, Sarra Sundstrom, Emily Tulsky Office of Economic Innovation and Partnerships (OEIP) Spin-In Team University of Delaware Supervised by: Willett Kempton and Sara Parkison ABOUT THIS PROJECT This project was commissioned and funded as part of the Spin-In program through the University of Delaware. The project was led by Dr. Willett Kempton, who knew of the coming need for offshore wind ports, and thought analysis of specific sites would help industry and investors to evaluate options on the eastern seaboard. The sector is fast growing, with states signing power purchase contracts for offshore wind power warranting investment in infrastructure to support that construction. This report is a feasibility analysis of two sites for an offshore wind marshalling port in the US Northeast. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This assessment was made all the more accurate thanks to the many individuals who were consulted or otherwise contributed to the analyses for this report. Thank you to Jesper Bank of Port of Esbjerg, Tim Kelly from the Army Corps of Engineers, Laura Mensch from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dr. John Madsen of UD, Eric Casey and Gene Bailey from Gulftainer, for their advisement, and to many others who contributed information and advice. Additional thanks to Emily Tino, Renee Hetrick, Christina Clark, Dr. Helen Bowers, Andrew Ames, and Cheryl Honaker for their participation earlier in the project. Thanks for financial and logistical support to the Spin-in program at UD Office of Economic Development and Partnerships, especially to Amalea Rassias, and the OEIP team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado
    The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with reliable consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific activities and model public-private sector relationships. • Real Estate Economics Preparation of strategic market data and analysis for prospective real estate development and public- private partnerships. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014
    APPLICATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOREIGN-TRADE ZONE FOR TOWN OF LIMON, COLORADO Submitted By: Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014 Grantee Structure and Legal Authority 2. Legal Authority for Application Please see Collective Attachment I, which is comprised of A--copy of the State’s enabling legislation; B—charter or organization papers showing the powers granted to Boards of Trustees and sections that are pertinent to FTZs; and C—certified copy of the Board of Trustees Resolution 3. Discuss the nature of the grantee organization (public or private; non-profit or for-profit). The proposed Grantee is a municipal corporation that has the legal status of a “town” under the laws of Title 31 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Colorado. This governmental entity is a body politic. The Grantee is governed by a mayor and a six member Board of Trustees (the mayor and each Trustee are elected for four year terms) with elections being held every two years by the qualified voters of the Town of Limon. 4. Summarize what you foresee as the operating structure of the zone and discuss the financing plan (as applicable). A summary of the operating structure of the zone and financing plan is: Zone status is being sought under an Alternative Site Framework (ASF) format for some 2,000 acres to be activated in the aggregate. As indicated above, this initial application has identified two sites totaling approximately +- 421.46 acres. The proposed Grantee believes that the flexibility offered by ASF is consistent with the flexibility which it intends to pursue in its development efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Area for Consideration for the Potential Locating of Offshore Wind Energy Areas TABLE of CONTENTS
    New York State Area for Consideration for the Potential Locating of Offshore Wind Energy Areas TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures . 2 List of Tables . 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations . 3 Executive Summary . 5 1.0 Introduction . 7 1 1 . Overview . 7 1 .2 New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan . 8 1 .3 Public Policy Context . 10 1 .4 Request for Wind Energy Areas . 10 2.0 Area for Consideration . 11 2 1. Area for Consideration for BOEM's Area Identification Process and the Locating of New Wind Energy Areas . 11 2 .2 Area for Consideration Selection Process . 12 3.0 Indicative Wind Energy Areas .. 18 4.0 General Schedule of Proposed Activities . 24 5.0 General Description of Objectives and Facilities . 27 5 1 . Objectives . 27 5 .2 Offshore Production Facilities and Substations . 27 5 .3 Power Transmission and Grid Connection . 29 5 .4 Onshore Support Facilities and Staging Areas . 30 This document is the result of work undertaken by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), the New York Department of State (DOS), and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) . The Area for Consideration presented in this document fulfills one of the key goals of the New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan . The New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan, which will be completed by the end of 2017, is a joint effort between NYSERDA, DOS, DEC, the New York State Department of Labor, the New York State Department of Public Service, Empire State Development, Long Island Power Authority, New York Power Authority, and Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation .
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Projects
    Renewable energy projects Project Name Project Description Oxley Wind Farm 3 turbines with total generation capacity of 6.15 MW Kingston Gardiner TS Odessa Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 116 acres SunE Newsboro 4 Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 247 acres RE Midhurst 3 3.5 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 32 acres Kawartha Biogas 9.8 MW biogas energy plant that will process organic material which will generate electricity and heat. Almonte Solar Farm 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 80 acres Elgin Grovlea Farms Inc's Wind Farm 2 turbine with total generation capactiy of 0.032 MW Alfred Solar Energy Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 160 acres Penn Energy - Van Dorp Solar Projects 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 138 acres Cochrane Solar Farm (Formerly Abitibi, Empire and 30 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 745 acres Martin's Meadow) Gesner Wind Energy Project 5 turbines with total generation capacity of 10 MW GoldLight Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 94 acres Springwood Wind Farm Project 4 turbines with total generation capacity of Page 1 of 84 09/29/2021 Renewable energy projects Project Type MOE Approval Number Wind 3780-96UL7S Solar 2294-8WJHD3 Solar Solar 5189-8SJNRC Bioenergy 4765-92MKCJ Solar 0112-94VKPR Wind 9716-8AVFSQ Solar 0578-8XGMUG Solar Solar 1290-9A4KSE Wind 3069-8NQQC7 Solar 0494-99WL4Q Wind 7563-8WYHXG Page 2 of 84 09/29/2021 Renewable energy projects Project Approval Type Proponent Name REA Oxley Wind Farm REA 2225054 Ontario Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION WHITE PAPER Authored By: Brandon W
    Credit: MHI Vestas Offshore Wind THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION WHITE PAPER Authored by: Brandon W. Burke (Business Network for Offshore Wind) Michael Goggin and Rob Gramlich (Grid Strategies LLC) October 2020 Credit: MHI Vestas Offshore Wind Foreword The Business Network for Offshore Wind (Network) is the only 501(c)(3) nonprofit organiza- tion exclusively devoted to developing the U.S. offshore wind industry and supply chain. As a result, the Network is uniquely positioned to speak with one leading voice for the U.S. offshore wind business community. A key objective of many state-level OSW programs, and a central tenet of the Network’s mis- sion, is to attract investment in U.S.-based OSW manufacturing facilities and related services. To realize this opportunity, investors and OSW developers must see a steady, predictable, and sustainable pipeline of OSW projects taking shape in the U.S. When the capacity of the existing onshore electricity grid is reached, and low-cost points of interconnection have been utilized, these grid/interconnection constraints could arrest the future growth of the U.S. OSW project pipeline. The objective of this white paper is to outline grid and transmission recommendations to in- form grid operators and U.S. policymakers in the many local, state, and federal regulatory bod- ies that possess some degree of regulatory responsibility for U.S. offshore wind development and electric transmission. A comprehensive document of this kind has not previously been produced, and it is incumbent upon the U.S. OSW industry to provide input and fill the gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadwind Energy, Inc. Amassing Wind Information Deepwater Wind
    MAY 2011 FEATURES AWEA WindPoWER SHoW iSSUE Company Profile: Broadwind Energy, Inc. Amassing Wind Information Deepwater Wind Developments Best Practices for Turbine Manufacturers Building a Better Bearing The Cedar Point Case Study Superconductors on the High Seas PREdiCTivE MAinTEnAnCE StrategiES Departments Construction—Mortenson Construction Maintenance—Rev1 Renewables Technology—Penn State Wind Energy Logistics—Professional Logistics Group Q&A: Terry Humphrey Castrol Industrial MaY 2011 FEATURES COMPANYPROFILE 22 BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. BY RUSS WILLCUTT With expertise in manufacturing gears and towers—and providing crucial blade, gearbox, and O&M services—this company is poised to help carry the wind industry forward. AMASSING WIND INFORMatiON BY LEE ALNES 24 Wind is a variable resource, but not an indecipherable one. Second Wind encourages harnessing the full range of wind sensing technologies available today. PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE 32 StrateGIES BY MIKE MOORE Following predictive maintenance strategies implemented by the industrial sector will increase reliability throughout your turbine system. Shermco Industries provides details. DEEPWater WIND 42 DEVELOPMENTS BY DAVID SOMERVILLE With the development of technologies such as Distributed Buoyancy Modules, Trelleborg Offshore is expanding the reach of deepwater wind development. BEST PRACTICES FOR TURBINE 50 MANufaCTURERS BY DAVE SCHAETZ AND STEVE LUDWIG The experts at Rockwell Automation have developed six principles for building cost-effective wind turbine generators in new markets, which they share with you here. BUILDING A BETTER BEARING BY GARY L. DOLL, PH.D. 58 Wind turbine main shaft and gearbox bearings may experience a variety of life-shortening situations. Timken’s “total system” approach offers real solutions. THE CEDAR POINT CASE STUDY BY KAILEY LORD 70 Reporting from the front lines, RES Americas provides a study of its first wind energy purchase from a facility constructed in Colorado with wind turbines manufactured there as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Creek Wind Farm
    Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm Jeremy Stefek,1 Anna Kaelin,1 Suzanne Tegen,2 Owen Roberts,1 and David Keyser1 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Colorado State University NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73659 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm Jeremy Stefek,1 Anna Kaelin,1 Suzanne Tegen,2 Owen Roberts,1 and David Keyser1 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Colorado State University Suggested Citation Stefek, Jeremy, Anna Kaelin, Suzanne Tegen, Owen Roberts, and David Keyser. 2019. Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-73659. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73659.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73659 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S.
    [Show full text]