DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Statement Hermanville/Clearspring 30 Megawatt Wind Farm Hermanville, Pe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Statement Hermanville/Clearspring 30 Megawatt Wind Farm Hermanville, Pe ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HERMANVILLE/CLEARSPRING 30 MEGAWATT WIND FARM HERMANVILLE, PE FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Prince Edward Island Energy Corporation Charlottetown, PE Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, A Division of AMEC Americas Limited Fredericton, NB January 2013 TE121023 PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prince Edward Island Energy Corporation (“PEIEC”) proposes to develop and operate a 30 megawatt (MW) wind farm. The Hermanville/Clearspring 30 MW Wind Farm, hereafter referred to as the “Project”, would be located between Clearspring and Hermanville, near the northeastern tip of the province of Prince Edward Island (PEI). The Study Area consists of approximately 4.5 kilometres (km) along Northside Road (Route 16) between New Zealand Road and Souris Line Road; 3 km along New Zealand Road from Northside Road, 2 km along Souris Line Road from Northside Road and 4.4 km along the southern boundary. The Study Area has been used in the past and currently for forestry purposes. The main stem of the proposed transmission line will be located along the eastern boundary of Souris Line Road between Northside Road and Grant Road. The Study Area has minimal residential development around its perimeter and can meet the Provincial requirements of a setback four (4) times the height of the turbine from any residential development. Along Souris Line Road, the proposed transmission line will run adjacent to six (6) residential properties. Approximately 20 km east of the Project is the East Point Wind Farm which currently operates ten (10) wind turbines and was also developed by PEIEC. The proposed Project implementation will begin Spring 2013, with operations to begin in late fall 2013. The Project will consist of erecting ten (10) wind turbines, each capable of producing 3 MW for a total nameplate production of 30 MW; a meteorological mast; a buried and/or overhead electrical collector system; single phase power line for the substation, substation; service building, 138 kilovolt (kV) transmission line between the substation and existing T-12 transmission line; as well as access roads to each turbine, substation and service building. Key environmental features identified within the Study Area are watercourses, wetlands, avian fauna (birds and bats) as well as identified floral Species-at-Risk. The operational life of this Project’s assets is expected to be twenty-five (25) years, at which time the assets will have to be replaced or decommissioned. The goal of the Project is to allow PEIEC to fulfil its directive to develop another 30 MW of wind power for domestic consumption by 2013 as stated in the PEI Energy Accord. Direct, measurable benefits of the Project to the Province and Canada will include: • reduced emissions, thereby contributing to Canada’s objective of reducing national total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 17% from 2005 levels by the year 2020; • enabling the Province to generate approximately 30% of its electricity from renewable power; • lowered dependence on imports of electricity to the Province; • more stabilized electricity costs within the Province; and • economic development benefits to the local area. TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (ii) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 This report addresses the environmental effects of the construction, operation and decommissioning project phases. The information reviewed and field studies have shown that no significant adverse residual impacts on the valued environmental components (VECs) are likely. The generation of electricity from renewable resources such as wind is in accordance with federal and provincial strategies, since it contributes to the reduction of GHG emissions and air pollutants. The Hermanville/Clearspring 30 MW Wind Farm, once approved, would contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions required to meet Canada’s and the Province of PEI’s targets. TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (iii) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT .......................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT AND PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTS ................................. 1 1.3 TITLE OF PROJECT ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF WIND FARM ................................................................. 4 1.5.1 Nominal Capacity ............................................................................................ 4 1.5.2 Expected Annual Energy Production ............................................................... 4 1.6 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 4 1.7 AGENCIES INVOLVED IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................ 4 1.7.1 Municipal Agency Involvement in the Project .................................................. 4 1.7.2 Provincial Agency Involvement in the Project .................................................. 5 1.7.3 Federal Agency Involvement in the Project ..................................................... 5 1.8 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................... 5 1.8.1 Regulations and Statutes Involved in Assessing the Project ........................... 5 1.9 AUTHOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .......................................... 5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 10 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 National and Regional Political Considerations ............................................. 10 2.2 PURPOSE OF PROJECT ......................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Justification for the Project ............................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... 11 2.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ....................................................................... 11 2.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT ........................................................................................ 12 2.5 LOCATION OF PROJECT ........................................................................................ 14 2.5.1 Site Layout ..................................................................................................... 14 2.5.2 Land Ownership ............................................................................................ 14 2.5.3 Key Environmental and Cultural Features ..................................................... 17 2.6 DETAILED PROJECT ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 17 2.6.1 Planning Phase ............................................................................................. 17 2.6.1.1 Surveying Activities .................................................................................... 17 2.6.2 Construction Phase ....................................................................................... 21 TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (iv) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 2.6.2.1 Site Preparation .......................................................................................... 22 2.6.2.2 New and Existing Access Roads ............................................................... 22 2.6.2.3 Delivery of Equipment ................................................................................ 24 2.6.2.4 Wind Turbine Assembly ............................................................................. 24 2.6.2.5 Substation Power Line ............................................................................... 28 2.6.2.6 Interconnection Cabling ............................................................................. 28 2.6.2.7 Transmission Line ...................................................................................... 28 2.6.2.8 On-site Substation ...................................................................................... 29 2.6.2.9 On-site Service Building ............................................................................. 30 2.6.2.10 Gates and Fencing ..................................................................................... 30 2.6.2.11 Turbine Commissioning ............................................................................. 30 2.6.3 Operation Phase ............................................................................................ 30 2.6.3.1 Road Maintenance ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Elektroprivrede Hz Herceg Bosne
    Vjesnik JP ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE CHE Čapljina – 30 godina www.ephzhb.ba INFORMATIVNO - STRUČNI LIST / Godina X. / Broj 44 / Mostar, srpanj 2009. Informativno-stručni list, Vjesnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik: JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d., Mostar Vlatko Međugorac Izdaje: Uredništvo: Sektor za odnose s javnošću Vlatko Međugorac, Mira Radivojević, mr. sc. Irina Budimir, Vanda Rajić, Zoran Pavić Ulica dr. Mile Budaka 106A, Mostar tel.: 036 335-727 Naklada: 800 primjeraka faks: 036 335-779 e-mail: [email protected] Tisak: www.ephzhb.ba FRAM-ZIRAL, Mostar Rukopisi i fotografije se ne vraćaju. 2 INFORMATIVNO STRUČNI LIST JAVNOGA PODUZEĆA ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE Sadržaj Novim informacijskim sustavom (SAP-om) do boljega poslovanja .......4 Održana VII. skupština Elektroprivrede HZ HB ................................7 Izvješće neovisnoga revizora ..................................................................8 str. 4 Potpisani ugovori o istražnim radovima na CHE Vrilo.......................10 Elektroprivreda i liberalizacija tržišta ..................................................11 30. rođendan CHE Čapljina ...............................................................13 Posjet njemačkoga veleposlanika i predstavnika KfW banke hidroelektrani Rama ............................................................................14 Primjena novih Općih uvjeta i Pravilnika o priključcima ....................16 HE Mostarsko Blato u izgradnji .........................................................17 str. 7 Uspješno provedena
    [Show full text]
  • Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan
    Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan Yang Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN 55987 Keywords: GIS, Wind Energy, Terrain Elevation, Multi-Criteria, Spatial Analysis Abstract Wind power is an alternative to fossil fuels. It is plentiful, renewable, widely distributed, clean, produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation and uses relatively little land. Recent studies indicate that Minnesota has plentiful wind energy potential including the possibility to use wind to generate 25 times the electricity Minnesota used in 2010 (American Wind Energy Association, 2012a). This study evaluates the potential wind energy resources in Minnesota by analyzing technical, environmental, and political criteria for developing local renewable wind energy resources. The approach assesses suitable locations for exploring wind turbines energy sources with the aid of a geographic information system. The study considers local wind conditions and other restrictions such as terrain, land use, environment, and human activities. The model identifies areas that have an excellent suitability for future wind turbine placement in Minnesota. When it compares to the approximate estimations based solely on analysis of wind speed, this rule-based model may provide a more accurate method to evaluate wind energy in Minnesota. Introduction contributing cause of global warming is the emission of greenhouse gases (in The issue of global warming is particular carbon dioxide), mainly becoming a
    [Show full text]
  • Document.Pdf
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Investment Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of the property known as Smokey Trail Apartments (510 Smokey Trail Drive) located in Limon, CO (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. However, the Seller makes no representations or warranties herein and the building is being sold in an “as is, where-is” condition. By receipt of this Memorandum, you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit or disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. or seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extracting any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire. Certain documents, including leases and other materials, are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the full agreements. Interested parties are expected to review all such documents independently. Financial projections are provided for reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado
    Enbridge’s economic impact on Colorado Enbridge, a North American energy These activities deliver a variety As the world’s population grows, delivery leader, was established of economic benefits to multiple we’ll need all forms of energy—crude in 1949 and exists to fuel people’s American states—and these aspects oil, natural gas, renewables—to meet quality of life. of our operations also fuel people’s rising global energy demand. As a quality of life, whether they’re: company with both pipelines and wind We move a very large slice of turbines, Enbridge is delivering energy North America’s oil, natural gas and • well-paying jobs in towns and cities; security and driving transformation natural gas liquids, safely and reliably. • tax revenue that can help build toward a lower-carbon economy. We operate North America’s premium schools, hospitals and roads; natural gas transmission franchise, • procurement spending that We’re proud to deliver economic crude oil and liquids pipeline business, stimulates local economies; or benefits in the states where we and natural gas utility business. • grants and volunteer labor for do business. community-strengthening projects. 1 Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Athabasca Fort McMurray Cheecham Kirby Lake Edmonton Hardisty Kerrobert Calgary Vancouver Regina Lethbridge Cromer Seattle Fredericton Rowatt Gretna Halifax Clearbrook Montreal Minot Superior Bualo Edgar Toronto Boston Westover Sarnia Dawn Bualo Energy assets, Casper Stockbridge New York operations and projects Chatham Leidy Guernsey Oakford Channahon Philadelphia Enbridge’s operations, projects, Gurley Toledo and/or asset ownership interests Flanagan Chicago Steckman in Colorado include: • DCP Midstream natural gas gathering Ridge lines and processing facilities in the Salisbury Accident Denver/Fort Collins, Grand Junction and Denver Kit Carson areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay
    Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay June 2020 Prepared by: Emma House, Zach Roy, Sarra Sundstrom, Emily Tulsky Office of Economic Innovation and Partnerships (OEIP) Spin-In Team University of Delaware Supervised by: Willett Kempton and Sara Parkison ABOUT THIS PROJECT This project was commissioned and funded as part of the Spin-In program through the University of Delaware. The project was led by Dr. Willett Kempton, who knew of the coming need for offshore wind ports, and thought analysis of specific sites would help industry and investors to evaluate options on the eastern seaboard. The sector is fast growing, with states signing power purchase contracts for offshore wind power warranting investment in infrastructure to support that construction. This report is a feasibility analysis of two sites for an offshore wind marshalling port in the US Northeast. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This assessment was made all the more accurate thanks to the many individuals who were consulted or otherwise contributed to the analyses for this report. Thank you to Jesper Bank of Port of Esbjerg, Tim Kelly from the Army Corps of Engineers, Laura Mensch from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dr. John Madsen of UD, Eric Casey and Gene Bailey from Gulftainer, for their advisement, and to many others who contributed information and advice. Additional thanks to Emily Tino, Renee Hetrick, Christina Clark, Dr. Helen Bowers, Andrew Ames, and Cheryl Honaker for their participation earlier in the project. Thanks for financial and logistical support to the Spin-in program at UD Office of Economic Development and Partnerships, especially to Amalea Rassias, and the OEIP team.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Utilities Commission Site Permit Amendment Application for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System
    Public Utilities Commission Site Permit Amendment Application for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System Northern States Power Company Nobles County, Minnesota Docket No. IP-6646/WS-09-584 February 2021 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 Project Name: Nobles Wind Farm Repower Project Project Location: Nobles County Applicant: Northern States Power Company Authorized Representative Matt Langan, Principal Agent Signature: ____ ____________ Company: Northern States Power Company, dba Xcel Energy Address: 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: 612.330.6954 Email: [email protected] Preparer of Application: Brie Anderson, Senior Project Manager Signature: __ _____________ Company: Merjent, Inc. Address: 1 Main Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.924.3986 Email: [email protected] NOBLES WIND FARM REPOWER PROJECT APPLICATION FOR A SITE PERMIT AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 APPLICANT INFORMATION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................. 1 1.1 Applicant Description ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Background, Purpose, and Need ................................................................. 1 1.3 Xcel Energy Repower Context ............................................................................... 3 1.4 Issued Site Permit and Changes Requested ............................................................ 3 1.5 Description of Repowering Process .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado
    The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with reliable consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific activities and model public-private sector relationships. • Real Estate Economics Preparation of strategic market data and analysis for prospective real estate development and public- private partnerships. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Bureau Of
    LSTOWNLD UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LEASE ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 01-OCT-2021 ALASKA OCS REGION PAGE: 1 Active Leases by Lessee - Detail LEASES HELD BY: 00087 10th OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 00100 11th OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale Zone 3 NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 00118 12th OCS Oil and Gas Sale Zone 2 NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03267 145 OG HOLDINGS, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03271 157 OG Holdings, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01145 1986 STEA Limited Partnership I NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01253 1987-I STEA Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01252 1987-VI STEA Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01470 1988-I TEAI Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01471 1988-II TEAI Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01472 1988-VI TEAI Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01566 1989-I TEAI Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01802 1993 Offshore Limited Partnership NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01965 1995 Income Program Limited Liability Company NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03266 207 OG HOLDINGS, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03272 233 OG Holdings, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 02687 300 Energy, Ltd. NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03492 31 Group LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03532 31 Offshore LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03276 321 OG Holdings, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 03265 376 OG HOLDINGS, LLC NO RECORDS FOUND LEASES HELD BY: 01969 3DX Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014
    APPLICATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOREIGN-TRADE ZONE FOR TOWN OF LIMON, COLORADO Submitted By: Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014 Grantee Structure and Legal Authority 2. Legal Authority for Application Please see Collective Attachment I, which is comprised of A--copy of the State’s enabling legislation; B—charter or organization papers showing the powers granted to Boards of Trustees and sections that are pertinent to FTZs; and C—certified copy of the Board of Trustees Resolution 3. Discuss the nature of the grantee organization (public or private; non-profit or for-profit). The proposed Grantee is a municipal corporation that has the legal status of a “town” under the laws of Title 31 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Colorado. This governmental entity is a body politic. The Grantee is governed by a mayor and a six member Board of Trustees (the mayor and each Trustee are elected for four year terms) with elections being held every two years by the qualified voters of the Town of Limon. 4. Summarize what you foresee as the operating structure of the zone and discuss the financing plan (as applicable). A summary of the operating structure of the zone and financing plan is: Zone status is being sought under an Alternative Site Framework (ASF) format for some 2,000 acres to be activated in the aggregate. As indicated above, this initial application has identified two sites totaling approximately +- 421.46 acres. The proposed Grantee believes that the flexibility offered by ASF is consistent with the flexibility which it intends to pursue in its development efforts.
    [Show full text]