DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File MW Plant ID Plant Name Operator Name State CF Q1'2015 Jan'15 Feb'15 Mar'15 CF Q1'2014 Jan'14 Feb'14 Mar'14 Installed 57098 Dry Lake Wind LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 63.0 AZ 14.0% 2,504 8,593 7,935 19.2% 6,195 9,650 10,236 57379 Dry Lake Wind II LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 65.1 AZ 13.6% 2,397 8,917 7,791 19.1% 6,308 9,902 10,665 58155 Perrin Ranch Wind LLC Perrin Ranch Wind LLC 99.2 AZ 18.4% 10,228 15,389 13,807 23.4% 14,547 15,029 20,490 227.3 15.8% 21.0% 7526 Solano Wind Sacramento Municipal Util Dist 230.0 CA 10.7% 4,319 21,969 26,865 13.3% 11,987 21,035 32,891 10027 EUIPH Wind Farm EUI Management PH Inc 25.4 CA 9.1% 117 2,558 2,317 13.8% 1,064 3,041 3,474 10586 Cameron Ridge LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 64.0 CA 16.4% 3,165 9,317 10,239 29.3% 8,307 16,609 15,521 10597 Ridgetop Energy LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 29.0 CA 13.2% 959 3,424 3,912 25.1% 3,206 6,427 6,096 50281 San Gorgonio Farms Wind Farm San Gorgonio Farms Inc 31.0 CA 12.8% 211 3,837 4,510 20.0% 1,591 5,098 6,733 50485 Altech III AES Wind Generation Inc 25.1 CA 14.9% 5,607 1,202 1,278 12.1% 680 2,144 3,756 50535 Mesa Wind Power Corp Airstreams LLC 29.9 CA 2.3% 42 807 667 1.2% 98 357 347 50536 Sky River LLC Sky River LLC 77.0 CA 14.9% 5,326 10,757 8,650 25.4% 11,723 14,736 15,783 50552 Cabazon Wind Farm FPL Energy Cabazon Wind 39.8 CA 10.5% 1,411 3,757 3,890 15.7% 2,732 4,491 6,244 50690 San Gorgonio Westwinds II LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 43.0 CA 13.4% 489 5,587 6,346 17.0% 1,688 6,264 7,834 50712 Altamont Pass Windplant Kenetech Windpower Inc 164.0 CA 5.2% 0 6,435 11,962 5.9% 75 3,750 16,992 50754 Oak Creek Energy Systems I Oak Creek Energy System Inc II 23.0 CA 16.2% 672 2,826 4,570 22.9% 2,040 4,318 5,011 50821 Mojave 16 Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 30.0 CA 6.1% 100 1,096 2,737 10.7% 1,764 2,583 2,616 50822 Mojave 17 Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 25.0 CA 7.3% 195 1,137 2,617 10.3% 1,653 2,136 1,765 50823 Mojave 18 Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 30.0 CA 9.6% 457 2,041 3,741 15.9% 2,752 3,657 3,905 52142 Mojave 4 Mojave 3/4/5 LLC 29.0 CA 15.0% 644 3,397 5,343 25.5% 5,375 4,553 6,069 54453 EDF Renewable Windfarm V Inc EDF Renewable Services Inc 16.2 CA 6.4% 222 1,029 980 9.4% 615 1,035 1,623 54454 San Gorgonio Windplant WPP1993 FPL Energy Operating Services, Inc. 84.0 CA 12.5% 1,455 10,159 11,020 17.8% 5,277 10,365 16,688 54647 TPC Windfarms LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 28.7 CA 25.9% 1,190 4,838 9,998 18.8% 2,953 3,982 4,731 54686 Difwind Farms Ltd VI EDF Renewable Services Inc 27.1 CA 8.5% 242 1,351 3,394 13.5% 1,718 2,740 3,472 54931 Ridgetop Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 46.8 CA 20.9% 2,935 8,423 9,733 29.0% 6,093 13,921 9,275 55719 Mountain View I&2 AES Wind Generation Inc 66.6 CA 15.4% 920 10,400 10,848 24.1% 4,777 13,897 16,022 56011 Cabazon Wind Partners Shell Wind Energy Inc. 41.0 CA 17.3% 2,574 6,656 6,097 25.8% 5,529 7,649 9,646 56012 Whitewater Hill Wind Partners Shell Wind Energy Inc. 61.5 CA 15.7% 798 10,088 10,012 25.1% 4,819 12,350 16,138 56075 High Winds LLC FPLE High Winds, LLC 162.0 CA 8.0% 2,182 12,667 13,121 9.8% 6,567 10,054 17,696 56295 Kumeyaay Wind Infigen Asset Management LLC 50.0 CA 28.0% 11,780 7,523 10,963 31.3% 7,254 11,581 14,933 56302 Oasis Wind EDF Renewable Services Inc 60.0 CA 18.7% 2,742 8,562 12,886 24.9% 9,590 11,257 11,459 56362 Shiloh I Wind Project Iberdrola Renewables Inc 150.0 CA 11.9% 3,863 17,806 17,038 15.6% 10,368 15,153 25,013 56433 Pine Tree Wind Power Project L.A. Department of Water & Power 135.0 CA 10.3% 3,056 11,853 15,244 22.1% 15,274 24,209 24,849 56446 Buena Vista Energy LLC Infigen Asset Management LLC 38.0 CA 9.5% 386 3,574 3,852 14.3% 2,644 3,772 5,309 56654 Hatchet Ridge Wind Project Pattern Operators LP 101.2 CA 34.8% 22,552 26,513 26,902 39.9% 25,168 27,978 34,138 56791 Dillon Wind LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 45.0 CA 16.9% 911 7,248 8,261 24.9% 3,732 9,209 11,223 56874 Shiloh Wind Project 2 LLC EDF Renewable Services Inc 150.0 CA 11.9% 4,706 18,039 15,910 16.2% 10,373 16,165 25,999 57201 FPL Energy Montezuma Winds LLC FPL Energy Montezuma Wind 36.8 CA 11.6% 1,132 4,225 3,865 14.8% 2,278 3,626 5,825 57282 Alta Wind Energy Center I Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 150.0 CA 15.7% 5,839 18,295 26,741 26.9% 21,421 30,787 35,072 57291 Alta Wind Energy Center II Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 150.0 CA 12.9% 2,749 13,037 26,037 20.9% 14,304 23,518 29,799 57292 Alta Wind Energy Center III Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 150.0 CA 13.9% 3,394 14,708 26,843 22.9% 15,562 26,519 32,207 57293 Alta Wind Energy Center IV Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 102.0 CA 9.4% 1,432 6,281 13,054 15.8% 7,049 13,256 14,596 57294 Alta Wind Energy Center V Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 168.0 CA 9.1% 2,503 10,419 20,270 15.5% 11,135 22,014 22,928 57459 Mountain View IV AES Wind Generation Inc 49.0 CA 16.3% 603 7,621 8,981 23.0% 3,067 9,191 12,135 57484 Manzana Wind LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 189.0 CA 18.3% 11,583 26,673 36,653 29.0% 30,808 39,069 48,517 57514 Ocotillo Express LLC Pattern Operators LP 315.0 CA 8.2% 2,197 24,568 29,255 15.1% 13,632 37,724 51,715 57586 Shiloh III Wind Project LLC EDF Renewable Services Inc 102.5 CA 12.3% 3,406 12,002 11,780 16.6% 6,807 11,486 18,483 57700 Vasco Winds Vasco Winds, LLC 78.2 CA 13.8% 2,898 10,564 9,791 20.0% 7,664 10,505 15,611 57701 Montezuma Wind II NextEra Montezuma Wind II, LLC 78.2 CA 12.2% 2,239 9,142 9,149 15.2% 5,100 7,669 12,875 57725 Shiloh IV Wind Project LLC EDF Renewable Services Inc 102.5 CA 12.9% 3,353 12,812 12,436 12.2% 7,529 1,109 18,342 57757 Pacific Wind LLC EDF Renewable Services Inc 140.0 CA 13.8% 5,013 15,106 21,632 23.8% 16,014 25,815 30,098 57774 Windstar 1 Windstar Energy LLC 120.0 CA 15.0% 3,865 13,480 21,480 22.3% 15,304 18,998 23,474 57833 Mustang Hills LLC Everpower Wind Holdings Inc 150.0 CA 11.2% 2,852 11,451 22,141 20.6% 17,431 22,801 26,486 57834 Pinyon Pine I MidAmerican Renewables LLC 168.0 CA 11.9% 3,262 13,832 25,923 20.3% 15,739 27,645 30,219 57835 Alta Wind VIII Brookfield Renewable Energy Group 150.0 CA 10.7% 2,735 11,218 20,839 18.3% 11,681 22,618 24,942 57837 Pinyon Pine II MidAmerican Renewables LLC 132.0 CA 10.9% 2,430 10,194 18,508 18.3% 10,909 19,721 21,531 57962 Brookfield Tehachapi 1 Brookfield Renewable Energy Group 102.0 CA 16.6% 3,487 13,375 19,646 28.1% 14,934 22,209 24,823 58154 North Sky River Energy LLC North Sky River Energy LLC 162.0 CA 17.3% 6,823 21,983 31,706 27.5% 21,102 33,589 41,660 58394 Alta Wind X Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 138.0 CA 14.6% 4,782 15,674 23,125 19.3% 5,620 19,003 32,839 58395 Alta Wind XI Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 90.0 CA 19.6% 7,966 14,028 16,120 29.2% 11,575 22,110 23,058 5,181.5 13.2% 19.8% 7937 Ponnequin Public Service Co of Colorado 25.3 CO 32.3% 6,711 6,248 4,683 38.6% 9,587 5,323 6,188 55741 Ridge Crest Wind Partners EDF Renewable Services Inc 29.7 CO 31.3% 8,926 6,401 4,736 38.3% 11,609 5,418 7,541 56173 Colorado Green Holdings LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 162.0 CO 26.6% 32,514 27,348 33,352 28.4% 39,402 31,010 29,106 56320 Spring Canyon Invenergy Services LLC 60.0 CO 44.8% 22,626 17,172 18,280 40.3% 15,682 15,600 21,008 56371 Cedar Creek Wind Infigen Asset Management LLC 300.5 CO 37.8% 95,445 80,385 69,212 39.5% 113,593 59,201 83,636 56460 Twin Buttes Wind Project Iberdrola Renewables Inc 75.0 CO 31.4% 18,816 14,888 17,098 34.2% 20,435 18,305 16,738 56563 Peetz Table Wind Energy FPL Peetz Table Wind Energy 199.5 CO 42.0% 65,882 56,151 59,007 44.9% 88,005 45,625 60,062 56613 Logan Wind Energy Logan Wind Energy LLC 201.0 CO 37.7% 59,521 49,804 54,457 41.4% 83,434 41,923 54,591 57174 Colorado Highlands Wind Colorado Highlands Wind LLC 91.0 CO 49.9% 35,280 29,606 33,242 49.9% 39,401 24,928 33,716 57210 Cedar Creek II AE Power Services LLC 250.8 CO 41.4% 85,866 70,264 68,291 41.8% 93,946 55,635 76,697 57244 Kit Carson Windpower Kit Carson Windpower LLC 51.0 CO 42.0% 16,819 14,424 14,977 50.5% 20,543 15,702 19,389 57290 Northern Colorado Wind LLC Northern Colorado Wind LLC 174.3 CO 35.3% 47,318 40,547 44,888 39.3% 60,891 35,444 51,653 57315 Cedar Point Wind Cedar Point LLC 250.2 CO 30.7% 64,873 44,761 56,013 37.8% 65,403 65,488 73,197 57980 Busch Ranch Wind Energy Farm Black Hills/Colorado Elec.Util 29.0 CO 29.0% 6,605 6,361 5,215 45.7% 10,180 8,653 9,824 58126 Limon Wind I Limon 200.0 CO 36.3% 58,271 42,557 55,854 47.2% 67,747 63,862 72,460 58127
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WASHINGTON – the Energy Department Released Two New
    Wind Scalability and Performance in the real World: A performance analysis of recently deployed US Wind Farms G. Bothun and B. Bekker, Dept. of Physics, University of Oregon. Abstract We are engaged in researching the real world performance, costs, and supply chain issues regarding the construction of wind turbines in the United States for the purpose of quantitatively determining various aspects of scalability in the wind industry as they relate to the continued build out of wind energy in the US. Our analysis sample consists of ~600 individual wind farms that have come into operation as of January 2011. Individual unit turbine capacity in these farms ranges from 1-5 to 3 MW, although the bulk of the installations are ≤ 2.0 MW. Starting in late 2012, however, and continuing with current projects, turbines of size 2.5 – 3.0 MW are being installed. As of July 1, 2014 the Horse Hollow development in Texas has the largest individual wind farm nameplate capacity of 736 MW and 10 other locations have aggregate capacity that exceeds 500 MW. Hence, large scale wind farm operations are now here. Based on our analysis our overall findings are the following: 1) at the end of 2014, cumulative wind nameplate capacity in the US will be at ~ 70 GW or ~ 5% of total US electrical infrastructure 2) over the period of 2006—2012, cumulative wind capacity growth was sustained at a rate of 23.7% per annum, 3) production in 2013 was dramatically lower than in 2012 and was just starting to pick up in 2014 due to lingering uncertainty about the future of the
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Elektroprivrede Hz Herceg Bosne
    Vjesnik JP ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE CHE Čapljina – 30 godina www.ephzhb.ba INFORMATIVNO - STRUČNI LIST / Godina X. / Broj 44 / Mostar, srpanj 2009. Informativno-stručni list, Vjesnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik: JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d., Mostar Vlatko Međugorac Izdaje: Uredništvo: Sektor za odnose s javnošću Vlatko Međugorac, Mira Radivojević, mr. sc. Irina Budimir, Vanda Rajić, Zoran Pavić Ulica dr. Mile Budaka 106A, Mostar tel.: 036 335-727 Naklada: 800 primjeraka faks: 036 335-779 e-mail: [email protected] Tisak: www.ephzhb.ba FRAM-ZIRAL, Mostar Rukopisi i fotografije se ne vraćaju. 2 INFORMATIVNO STRUČNI LIST JAVNOGA PODUZEĆA ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE Sadržaj Novim informacijskim sustavom (SAP-om) do boljega poslovanja .......4 Održana VII. skupština Elektroprivrede HZ HB ................................7 Izvješće neovisnoga revizora ..................................................................8 str. 4 Potpisani ugovori o istražnim radovima na CHE Vrilo.......................10 Elektroprivreda i liberalizacija tržišta ..................................................11 30. rođendan CHE Čapljina ...............................................................13 Posjet njemačkoga veleposlanika i predstavnika KfW banke hidroelektrani Rama ............................................................................14 Primjena novih Općih uvjeta i Pravilnika o priključcima ....................16 HE Mostarsko Blato u izgradnji .........................................................17 str. 7 Uspješno provedena
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2012 Copyright © Frankfurt School of Finance and Management Ggmbh 2012
    GLOBAL TRENDS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT 2012 Copyright © Frankfurt School of Finance and Management gGmbH 2012. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Frankfurt School - UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate Change & Sustainable Energy Finance would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Frankfurt School of Finance & Management gGmbH. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 4 FOREWORD FROM ACHIM STEINER ................................................................................................................ 5 FOREWORD FROM UDO STEFFENS ................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. 7 METHODOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................... 9 KEY FINDINGS ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Desert Wind Farm - Wind Farm 'Mega-Project' Underway in Mojave Desert - Los Angeles Times
    Mojave Desert Wind Farm - Wind farm 'mega-project' underway in Mojave Desert - Los Angeles Times ← Back to Original Article Wind farm 'mega-project' underway in Mojave Desert The Alta Wind Energy Center — with plans for thousands of acres of turbines to generate electricity for 600,000 Southern California homes — officially breaks ground Tuesday. July 27, 2010 | By Tiffany Hsu, Los Angeles Times It's being called the largest wind power project in the country, with plans for thousands of acres of towering turbines in the Mojave Desert foothills generating electricity for 600,000 homes in Southern California. And now it's finally kicking into gear. The multibillion-dollar Alta Wind Energy Center has had a tortured history, stretching across nearly a decade of ownership changes, opposition from local residents and transmission infrastructure delays. But on Tuesday, the project is officially breaking ground in the Tehachapi Pass, a burgeoning hot spot for wind energy about 75 miles north of Los Angeles. When completed, Alta could produce three times as much energy as the country's largest existing wind farm, analysts said. It's slated to be done in the next decade. The project will probably be a wind power bellwether, affecting the way renewable energy deals are financed, the development of new electricity storage systems and how governments regulate the industry, said Billy Gamboa, a renewable energy analyst with the California Center for Sustainable Energy. "It's a super-mega-project — it'll definitely set a precedent for the rest of the state and have a pretty large impact on the wind industry in general," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan
    Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan Yang Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN 55987 Keywords: GIS, Wind Energy, Terrain Elevation, Multi-Criteria, Spatial Analysis Abstract Wind power is an alternative to fossil fuels. It is plentiful, renewable, widely distributed, clean, produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation and uses relatively little land. Recent studies indicate that Minnesota has plentiful wind energy potential including the possibility to use wind to generate 25 times the electricity Minnesota used in 2010 (American Wind Energy Association, 2012a). This study evaluates the potential wind energy resources in Minnesota by analyzing technical, environmental, and political criteria for developing local renewable wind energy resources. The approach assesses suitable locations for exploring wind turbines energy sources with the aid of a geographic information system. The study considers local wind conditions and other restrictions such as terrain, land use, environment, and human activities. The model identifies areas that have an excellent suitability for future wind turbine placement in Minnesota. When it compares to the approximate estimations based solely on analysis of wind speed, this rule-based model may provide a more accurate method to evaluate wind energy in Minnesota. Introduction contributing cause of global warming is the emission of greenhouse gases (in The issue of global warming is particular carbon dioxide), mainly becoming a
    [Show full text]
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March
    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary ¾ Electricity Report ¾ Natural Gas Report ¾ Communications Report ¾ Water/Wastewater Report ¾ Acronyms ¾ Glossary
    Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission 2007 Regulatory Flexibility Report to the Indiana General Assembly Links to Major Sections of the Regulatory Flexibility Report Click on Links Below to Navigate to Major Sections of the Regulatory Flexibility Report ¾ Executive Summary ¾ Electricity Report ¾ Natural Gas Report ¾ Communications Report ¾ Water/Wastewater Report ¾ Acronyms ¾ Glossary Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This 2007 Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Report to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly highlights key issues that confront Indiana Electric, Gas, Communications, and Water/Wastewater industries, as well as the role of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC, Commission) in addressing these issues. For the first time, and while not required by statute, a section on the Water/Wastewater industry is included in this Report in response to concerns raised during the most recent session of the legislature. While each industry has unique issues, several issues discussed in this Report cut across multiple industries. This Executive Summary contains a brief overview of these cross-industry and industry-specific issues which are more fully addressed in the body of the Report. For your convenience there is a list of acronyms and a glossary in the back of the Report. CROSS-INDUSTRY ISSUES Aging infrastructure is a concern for many Indiana utilities. The Electric, Gas, and Water/Wastewater sections of this Report specifically discuss aging infrastructure and the potential problems and costs associated with repairing or replacing old facilities. Coupled with aging facilities is increasing consumer demand for electric, gas, telecommunications, and water services. Increased consumer demand can accelerate the deterioration of equipment and limit periods in which facilities can be conveniently removed from service for maintenance or replacement.
    [Show full text]