DOCSLIB.ORG

EIA) 2011 December EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2011 December EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File NET State MWh in State MW in Plant ID Plant Name Operator Name MW Installed State Year GENERATION CF* Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CF* CF* (mWh) 6304 Kotzebue Kotzebue Electric Assn Inc 3.0 AK 2011 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57187 Pillar Mountain Wind Project Kodiak Electric Assn Inc 4.5 AK 2011 12,445 31.6% 418 59 1,564 438 936 1,090 1,300 1,429 753 1,154 1,682 1,621 7.5 12,445 12,445 4.5 31.6% 57098 Dry Lake Wind LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 63.0 AZ 2011 124,401 22.5% 4,340 13,601 15,149 18,430 17,297 16,785 7,124 5,735 4,036 6,320 11,154 4,430 57379 Dry Lake Wind II LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 65.1 AZ 2011 124,330 21.8% 4,340 13,789 16,021 19,219 16,686 16,398 6,345 5,569 3,743 6,281 11,579 4,360 57775 Kingman 1 Kingman Energy Corp 10.0 AZ 2011 6,848 7.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,026 1,663 2,999 1,160 138.1 255,579 248,731 128.1 22.2% 7526 Solano Wind Sacramento Municipal Util Dist 63.0 CA 2011 221,067 40.1% 6,705 12,275 17,464 27,415 29,296 29,128 24,813 25,928 14,915 11,870 12,233 9,025 10005 Dinosaur Point International Turbine Res Inc 17.4 CA 2011 23,562 15.5% 715 1,308 1,861 2,922 3,123 3,105 2,645 2,763 1,590 1,265 1,304 962 10027 EUIPH Wind Farm EUI Management PH Inc 25.0 CA 2011 46,718 21.3% 1,417 2,594 3,691 5,794 6,191 6,156 5,244 5,479 3,152 2,509 2,585 1,907 10191 Tehachapi Wind Resource I CalWind Resources Inc 8.7 CA 2011 15,402 20.2% 467 855 1,217 1,910 2,041 2,029 1,729 1,806 1,039 827 852 629 10586 Cameron Ridge LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 64.0 CA 2011 177,404 31.6% 8,643 9,903 19,585 23,881 21,815 23,381 15,642 17,231 7,831 9,540 13,232 6,720 10597 Ridgetop Energy LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 29.0 CA 2011 66,011 26.0% 2,989 3,889 7,512 9,217 8,132 8,114 5,458 6,174 2,817 3,847 5,544 2,318 10815 Difwind Farms Ltd VII EDF Renewable Services Inc 24.0 CA 2011 37,271 17.7% 1,130 2,069 2,944 4,622 4,939 4,911 4,183 4,371 2,515 2,001 2,062 1,522 50001 Altamont Midway Ltd AES Wind Generation Inc 10.9 CA 2011 9,054 9.5% 275 503 715 1,123 1,200 1,193 1,016 1,062 611 486 501 370 50276 Wintec Energy Ltd Wintec Energy Ltd 7.5 CA 2011 15,499 23.6% 470 861 1,224 1,922 2,054 2,042 1,740 1,818 1,046 832 858 633 50281 San Gorgonio Farms Wind Farm San Gorgonio Farms Inc 31.0 CA 2011 74,801 27.5% 2,269 4,153 5,909 9,276 9,913 9,856 8,396 8,773 5,047 4,016 4,139 3,054 50485 Altech III AES Wind Generation Inc 25.1 CA 2011 45,575 20.7% 1,382 2,531 3,600 5,652 6,040 6,005 5,116 5,345 3,075 2,447 2,522 1,861 50532 Victory Garden (Tehachapi) AES Wind Generation Inc 17.6 CA 2011 61,934 40.2% 1,878 3,439 4,893 7,680 8,208 8,161 6,952 7,264 4,179 3,326 3,427 2,528 50533 Painted Hills H H Management LLC 15.3 CA 2011 37,867 28.3% 1,149 2,103 2,991 4,696 5,018 4,989 4,250 4,441 2,555 2,033 2,095 1,546 50534 Santa Clara (85C) AES Wind Generation Inc 18.0 CA 2011 24,219 15.4% 735 1,345 1,913 3,003 3,210 3,191 2,718 2,841 1,634 1,300 1,340 989 50535 Mesa Wind Power Corp Airstreams LLC 30.0 CA 2011 52,921 20.1% 1,605 2,938 4,181 6,563 7,013 6,973 5,940 6,207 3,570 2,842 2,928 2,160 50536 Sky River LLC Sky River LLC 77.0 CA 2011 170,379 25.3% 8,054 12,600 14,787 27,472 25,350 20,787 14,069 15,569 6,593 9,346 11,878 3,874 50552 Cabazon Wind Farm FPL Energy Cabazon Wind 39.8 CA 2011 68,323 19.6% 3,940 5,033 7,404 6,445 3,991 9,239 8,079 8,142 4,533 3,978 4,477 3,062 50553 Edom Hills Project 1 LLC AE Power Services LLC 21.1 CA 2011 52,168 28.2% 1,582 2,897 4,121 6,469 6,913 6,874 5,856 6,119 3,520 2,801 2,887 2,130 50690 San Gorgonio Westwinds II LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 43.4 CA 2011 130,964 34.4% 4,308 7,099 14,522 16,243 17,560 18,567 15,041 14,326 9,320 8,297 4,425 1,256 50712 Altamont Pass Windplant Kenetech Windpower Inc 164.0 CA 2011 426,801 29.7% 433 19,070 19,788 50,786 66,216 64,876 71,383 72,463 40,049 17,597 2,023 2,117 50754 Oak Creek Energy Systems I Oak Creek Energy System Inc II 23.0 CA 2011 68,361 33.9% 2,508 2,780 7,005 10,584 8,965 10,223 5,880 6,494 3,347 3,980 4,562 2,033 50818 Altech AES Wind Generation Inc 5.8 CA 2011 9,054 17.9% 275 503 715 1,123 1,200 1,193 1,016 1,062 611 486 501 370 50820 East Winds Project AES Wind Generation Inc 4.2 CA 2011 7,669 20.8% 233 426 606 951 1,016 1,010 861 899 517 412 424 313 50821 Mojave 16 ESI Mojave LLC 30.0 CA 2011 41,300 15.7% 1,428 1,839 4,818 6,958 5,941 6,428 3,517 4,150 1,987 1,428 2,471 335 50822 Mojave 17 ESI Mojave LLC 25.0 CA 2011 36,221 16.5% 1,099 2,011 2,861 4,492 4,800 4,773 4,066 4,248 2,444 1,945 2,004 1,479 50823 Mojave 18 ESI Mojave LLC 30.0 CA 2011 57,755 22.0% 2,737 3,223 6,421 8,953 7,882 7,949 4,725 5,654 3,112 2,737 3,613 749 52142 Mojave 4 TPC 3/5, Inc. 29.0 CA 2011 79,664 31.4% 2,416 4,423 6,293 9,879 10,557 10,497 8,942 9,343 5,375 4,278 4,408 3,252 52143 Mojave 3 TPC 3/5, Inc. 23.5 CA 2011 65,699 31.9% 1,993 3,648 5,190 8,147 8,707 8,657 7,374 7,706 4,433 3,528 3,635 2,682 52144 Mojave 5 TPC 3/5, Inc. 22.5 CA 2011 65,318 33.1% 1,981 3,627 5,160 8,100 8,656 8,606 7,332 7,661 4,407 3,507 3,614 2,667 52160 Victory Garden Phase IV LLC Victory Garden Phase IV LLC 22.0 CA 2011 44,754 23.2% 1,357 2,485 3,536 5,550 5,931 5,897 5,023 5,249 3,019 2,403 2,476 1,827 52161 Terra-Gen 251 Wind LLC Terra-Gen Operating Co LLC 18.4 CA 2011 27,232 16.9% 826 1,512 2,151 3,377 3,609 3,588 3,057 3,194 1,837 1,462 1,507 1,112 52162 85 A AES Wind Generation Inc 14.1 CA 2011 19,384 15.7% 588 1,076 1,531 2,404 2,569 2,554 2,176 2,273 1,308 1,041 1,073 791 52163 85 B AES Wind Generation Inc 21.2 CA 2011 25,984 14.0% 788 1,443 2,053 3,222 3,443 3,424 2,917 3,048 1,753 1,395 1,438 1,061 52165 Helzel & Schwarzhoff 88 Wind Farm AES Wind Generation Inc 1.8 CA 2011 3,036 19.3% 92 169 240 376 402 400 341 356 205 163 168 124 54258 Westwind Trust EDF Renewable Services Inc 15.7 CA 2011 22,229 16.2% 674 1,234 1,756 2,757 2,946 2,929 2,495 2,607 1,500 1,194 1,230 907 54298 Coram Energy LLC (ECT) Coram Energy, LLC 7.5 CA 2011 28,089 42.8% 852 1,560 2,219 3,483 3,722 3,701 3,153 3,294 1,895 1,508 1,554 1,147 54299 Coram Energy LLC Coram Energy, LLC 3.0 CA 2011 11,756 44.7% 357 653 929 1,458 1,558 1,549 1,320 1,379 793 631 651 480 54300 CTV Power Purchase Contract Trust Coram Energy, LLC 4.5 CA 2011 11,804 29.9% 358 655 933 1,464 1,564 1,555 1,325 1,384 796 634 653 482 54454 San Gorgonio Windplant WPP1993 FPL Energy Operating Services, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • WASHINGTON – the Energy Department Released Two New

    WASHINGTON – the Energy Department Released Two New

    Wind Scalability and Performance in the real World: A performance analysis of recently deployed US Wind Farms G. Bothun and B. Bekker, Dept. of Physics, University of Oregon. Abstract We are engaged in researching the real world performance, costs, and supply chain issues regarding the construction of wind turbines in the United States for the purpose of quantitatively determining various aspects of scalability in the wind industry as they relate to the continued build out of wind energy in the US. Our analysis sample consists of ~600 individual wind farms that have come into operation as of January 2011. Individual unit turbine capacity in these farms ranges from 1-5 to 3 MW, although the bulk of the installations are ≤ 2.0 MW. Starting in late 2012, however, and continuing with current projects, turbines of size 2.5 – 3.0 MW are being installed. As of July 1, 2014 the Horse Hollow development in Texas has the largest individual wind farm nameplate capacity of 736 MW and 10 other locations have aggregate capacity that exceeds 500 MW. Hence, large scale wind farm operations are now here. Based on our analysis our overall findings are the following: 1) at the end of 2014, cumulative wind nameplate capacity in the US will be at ~ 70 GW or ~ 5% of total US electrical infrastructure 2) over the period of 2006—2012, cumulative wind capacity growth was sustained at a rate of 23.7% per annum, 3) production in 2013 was dramatically lower than in 2012 and was just starting to pick up in 2014 due to lingering uncertainty about the future of the
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
  • Mojave Desert Wind Farm - Wind Farm 'Mega-Project' Underway in Mojave Desert - Los Angeles Times

    Mojave Desert Wind Farm - Wind Farm 'Mega-Project' Underway in Mojave Desert - Los Angeles Times

    Mojave Desert Wind Farm - Wind farm 'mega-project' underway in Mojave Desert - Los Angeles Times ← Back to Original Article Wind farm 'mega-project' underway in Mojave Desert The Alta Wind Energy Center — with plans for thousands of acres of turbines to generate electricity for 600,000 Southern California homes — officially breaks ground Tuesday. July 27, 2010 | By Tiffany Hsu, Los Angeles Times It's being called the largest wind power project in the country, with plans for thousands of acres of towering turbines in the Mojave Desert foothills generating electricity for 600,000 homes in Southern California. And now it's finally kicking into gear. The multibillion-dollar Alta Wind Energy Center has had a tortured history, stretching across nearly a decade of ownership changes, opposition from local residents and transmission infrastructure delays. But on Tuesday, the project is officially breaking ground in the Tehachapi Pass, a burgeoning hot spot for wind energy about 75 miles north of Los Angeles. When completed, Alta could produce three times as much energy as the country's largest existing wind farm, analysts said. It's slated to be done in the next decade. The project will probably be a wind power bellwether, affecting the way renewable energy deals are financed, the development of new electricity storage systems and how governments regulate the industry, said Billy Gamboa, a renewable energy analyst with the California Center for Sustainable Energy. "It's a super-mega-project — it'll definitely set a precedent for the rest of the state and have a pretty large impact on the wind industry in general," he said.
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March

    Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March

    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
  • Statewide Air Emissions Calculations from Wind and Other Renewables

    Statewide Air Emissions Calculations from Wind and Other Renewables

    ESL-TR-20-07-01 STATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM WIND AND OTHER RENEWABLES VOLUME I A Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality For the Period January 2019 – December 2019 Juan-Carlos Baltazar, Ph.D., P.E.; Jeff Haberl, Ph.D.; Bahman Yazdani, P.E.; David Claridge, Ph.D., P.E.; Sungkyun Jung; Farshad Kheiri; Chul Kim July 2020 Page 1 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY July 15, 2020 Mr. Robert Gifford Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, TX 78711-3087 Dear Mr. Gifford, The Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of The Texas A&M University System is pleased to provide its annual report, “Statewide Emissions Calculations From Wind and Other Renewables,” as required by the 79th Legislature. This work has been performed through a contract with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In this work, the ESL is required to obtain input from public/private stakeholders, and develop and use a methodology to annually report the energy savings from wind and other renewables. This report summarizes the work performed by the ESL on this project from January 2019 to December 2019. Please contact me at (979) 845-9213 should you have questions concerning this report or the work presently being done to quantify emissions reductions from renewable energy measures as a result of the TERP implementation. Sincerely, David E. Claridge, Ph.D., P.E. Director Enclosure . Page 2 Disclaimer This report is provided by the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) as required under Section 388.003 (e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code and is distributed for purposes of public information.
  • Operational Impacts to Raptors (PDF)

    Operational Impacts to Raptors (PDF)

    To: John Ford, Director From: Bob Roy County of Humboldt Planning and Building Stantec Consulting Department 30 Park Drive 3015 H Street Topsham, ME 04222 Eureka, California 95501 [email protected] Date: August 23, 2019 Reference: Operational Impacts to Raptors Humboldt Wind has commissioned Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to review the draft EIR for the Humboldt Wind Project and provide a re-evaluation of the DEIR’s analysis of potential impacts to raptors. WEST is a firm that is expert in conducting ecological studies and analyzing complicated natural resource data. The attached memo provides WEST’s recommended analysis of the likely impacts of the project on raptors. As noted in WEST’s memo, the DEIR appears to overestimate what the likely impacts of the project will be on local and regional raptor populations. The DEIR reviews several data sets but does not set an explicit expectation of what the project’s likely impact will be. Rather, it reviews a range of potential impacts using different datasets and metrics, and then concludes that impacts will be significant and unavoidable after mitigation. However, WEST’s analysis provides compelling evidence that the DEIR’s analysis is flawed and that actual impacts at the project are likely to be significantly less than that stated in the DEIR and would not lead to local or regional populations of raptor species to fall below self-sustaining levels. Key to this analysis, or the difference between the two analyses, is that raptor impacts at the Humboldt project would not be similar to those documented at projects in central and southern California (where raptor use is far greater than at the project) and the fact that raptor use at the project site is very similar to that documented at Hatchet Ridge, where raptor fatalities have been found to be very low after three years of post-construction monitoring.
  • Workshop Summary

    Workshop Summary

    OCS STUDY MMS 2007-057 Workshop to Identify Alternative Energy Environmental Information Needs Workshop Summary October 2007 Cover art from workshop handout OCS Report MMS 2007-057 Workshop to Identify Alternative Energy Environmental Information Needs Workshop Summary Authors Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc. Elizabeth Burkhard Environmental Studies Branch, Minerals Management Service October 2007 Prepared under MMS Contract 1435-01-06-CT-39821 by Research Planning, Inc. 1121 Park Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Published by Disclaimer This report was prepared under contract between the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and Research Planning, Inc. (RPI). This report has been technically reviewed by the MMS, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the MMS, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Citation Michel, J. and Burkhard, E. 2007. Workshop to Identify Alternative Energy Environmental Information Needs: Workshop Summary. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Herndon, VA, MMS OCS Report 2007-057. 50 pp. + appendices. Acknowledgements MMS thanks all the participants at the Workshop to Identify Alternative Energy Environmental Information Needs, held on 26-28 June 2007 in Herndon, VA. We were pleased that there was such interest and discussion. A special note of thanks is extended to each of the presenters. The success of the breakout sessions was due to the efforts of the MMS leads Elizabeth Burkhard, Rodney Cluck, Maurice Hill, and Jeff Ji as well as the facilitators Sean M. Casey, Jacqueline Michel, John Poulin, and Scott Graves.
  • Glacier Hills Wind Park Project Volume 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Glacier Hills Wind Park Project Volume 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement

    PSC REF#:120688 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin September 2009 RECEIVED: 09/29/09, 3:28:29 PM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Glacier Hills Wind Park Project Volume 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement PSC Docket 6630-CE-302 Date Issued: September 2009 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Glacier Hills Wind Park Project Public Service Commission of Wisconsin 610 North Whitney Way P.O. Box 7854 Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7854 Phone 608.266.5481 • Fax 608.266.3957 • TTY 608.267.1479 E-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.psc.wi.gov his final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Glacier Hills Wind Park project is progress towards compliance with the Public Service Commission’s requirement under T Wis. Stat. § 1.11 and Wis. Admin. Code § PSC 4.30. Questions about information provided in this final Environmental Impact Statement should be directed to: Michael John Jaeger Jim Lepinski (environmental) or (engineering) Public Service Commission Public Service Commission (608) 267-2546 (608) 266-0478 [email protected] [email protected] To the Reader his final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) fulfills part of the requirements of the Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act (WEPA), Wis. Stat. § 1.11. WEPA requires state agencies to consider T environmental factors when making major decisions. The purpose of this final EIS is to provide the decision makers, the public, and other stakeholders with an analysis of the economic, social, cultural, and environmental impacts that could result from the construction and operation of the new wind electric generation facility.
  • Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California

    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California

    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California Final Report for the Second Year of Operation April 2015 – April 2016 Prepared for Alta Wind X, LLC 14633 Willow Springs Road Mojave, California 93501 Prepared by: Joel Thompson, Carmen Boyd, and John Lombardi Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 July 22, 2016 Alta X Year 2 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alta Wind X, LLC (Alta Wind X) has constructed a wind energy facility in Kern County, California, referred to as the Alta X Wind Energy Project (“Alta X” or “Project”). Consistent with the Alta East Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Alta Wind X is committed to conducting avian and bat mortality monitoring at the Project during the first, second, and third years of operation. Following construction in the spring of 2014, Alta Wind X contracted Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to develop and implement a study protocol for post- construction monitoring at the Project for the purpose of estimating the impacts of the wind energy facility on birds and bats. The following report describes the methods and results of mortality monitoring conducted during the second year of operation of the Project, April 2015 to April 2016. As stated in the DEIR, the goal of the mortality monitoring study is determine the level of incidental injury and mortality to populations of avian or bat species in the vicinity of the Project. To this end, WEST designed and implemented a 3-year study to determine the level of bird and bat mortality attributable to collisions with wind turbines at the facility on an annual basis.
  • News Release from Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc

    News Release from Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc

    News release from Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. Portland, 27 May 2011 Page 1 of 2 Vestas receives 219 MW order in California, USA With reference to Vestas Wind Systems A/S’ company announcement No. 24/2011 of 27 May 2011, Vestas has received a 219 MW order for 73 V90-3.0 MW wind turbines for an expansion of the Alta Wind Energy Center near Tehachapi, California, USA. Overall, the expansion will install 100 V90-3.0 MW turbines as 27 were already purchased in 2010. The order has been placed by subsidiaries of Alta Wind Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Terra-Gen Power, LLC. The contract includes delivery and commissioning along with a five-year service and maintenance agreement for the 300-MW project. Delivery is scheduled for fall 2011 and commissioning is expected in late 2011. In July 2010, Vestas also won a 570 MW order from Terra-Gen for 190 V90-3.0 MW turbines for the Alta Wind Energy Center. It was Vestas’ largest sale – in terms of MW – for turbines going toward a single site in company history. “We are very pleased that Terra-Gen has decided to use Vestas turbines to expand the Alta Wind Energy Center,” said Martha Wyrsch, President of Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. “Our 570 MW project with Terra-Gen was delivered and brought to the electrical grid ahead of schedule. We value our partnership with Terra-Gen very highly and look forward to the same success on the next phase of the Alta Wind project expansion.” The 570-MW project was completed April 22, 2011, and has the capacity to provide electricity to about 170,000 California homes annually.
  • Utily08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas

    Utily08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas

    UtilY08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 8 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 20 AES Cypress LLC 21 AES Shady Point LLC 23 A B Energy Inc 24 Nations Energy Holdings LLC 25 AES Greenidge 34 Abbeville City of Roger M Hall 35 AES WR Ltd Partnership 39 AES Hickling LLC 40 Hospira Inc 42 AES Thames LLC 46 AES Hoytdale LLC 52 ACE Cogeneration Co 54 Abitibi Consolidated 55 Aberdeen City of 56 Abitibi Consolidated Sale Corp 59 City of Abbeville Water & Light Plant 60 Acadia Bay Energy Co LLC 65 Abitibi Consolidated-Lufkin 82 Ada Cogeneration Ltd Partnership 84 A & N Electric Coop V N Brinkley 87 City of Ada 88 Granite Ridge Energy LLC 97 Adams Electric Coop 108 Adams-Columbia Electric Coop 109 Ag Processing Inc 113 Agway Energy Services, LLC 114 Addis Energy Center LLC 116 Agway Energy Services-PA Inc 118 Adams Rural Electric Coop, Inc 122 Village of Arcade 123 City of Adel 127 Aera Energy LLC 128 Adrian Energy Associates LLC 134 AES Eastern Energy LP 135 Agrilectric Power Partners Ltd 142 AES Beaver Valley 144 AEP Retail Energy LLC 146 AEI Resources 149 City of Afton 150 Adrian Public Utilities Comm Terry Miller 151 Adirondack Hydro-4 Branch LLC 154 AES Corp 155 Agralite Electric Coop Attn: R. Millett, Gen. Mgr. 156 AES Deepwater Inc 157 Town of Advance 162 Aiken Electric Coop Inc 163 AERA Energy LLC-Oxford 164 AERA Energy LLC 172 Ahlstrom Dexter LLC Page 1 UtilY08 174 Aitkin Public Utilities Comm Charles Tibbetts 176 Ajo Improvement Co 177 AES Hawaii Inc 178 AES Placerita Inc 179 Agrium US Inc 182 City of Akron 183 Village of Akron 189 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Jeff Parish 191 Alamo Power District No 3 192 Akiachak Native Community Electric Co 194 Albuquerque City of 195 Alabama Power Co Mike Craddock 197 Akron Thermal LP 198 City of Alton 201 City of Alachua 202 Town of Black Creek 204 Alabama Pine Pulp Co Inc 207 City of Alameda 211 Aetna Life & Casualty 212 AHA Macav Power Service 213 Alaska Electric Light&Power Co Attn Scott Willis 219 Alaska Power Co Attn Sheryl Dennis 220 Alaska Power Administration Attn.
  • Terra-Gen Power Announces Closing of $1.2 Billion Construction Financing and Wind Turbine Order to Launch Build-Out of the Nation's Largest Wind Farm

    Terra-Gen Power Announces Closing of $1.2 Billion Construction Financing and Wind Turbine Order to Launch Build-Out of the Nation's Largest Wind Farm

    TERRA-GEN POWER ANNOUNCES CLOSING OF $1.2 BILLION CONSTRUCTION FINANCING AND WIND TURBINE ORDER TO LAUNCH BUILD-OUT OF THE NATION'S LARGEST WIND FARM 7/22/2010 NEW YORK, NY – Terra-Gen Power, LLC ("Terra-Gen") announced today that it has closed a $1.2 billion financing for four wind power projects with a total of 570 megawatts (MW) of capacity at its Alta Wind Energy Center in Kern County, California. The four projects, known as Alta Projects II-V, will use 190 V90-3.0 MW turbines manufactured by Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. (“Vestas”). The Alta Wind Energy Center is a 3,000 MW wind power development initiative. Along with the 150 MW Alta Project I utilizing GE turbines, which closed financing and commenced construction in March 2010, this financing puts Terra- Gen well on its way to completing what is anticipated to be the largest wind energy farm in the nation. The $1.2 billion financing for the Alta Projects II-V included the issuance of approximately $580 million of pass through certificates due 2035 via a Rule 144A offering, a construction bridge loan facility of $499 million and ancillary credit facilities of $127 million. Proceeds from the certificates and bridge loans will be used to fund construction of the projects. Citi, Barclays Capital and Credit Suisse acted as joint book-running managers for the issuance of the pass through certificates, and Mitsubishi UFJ Securities, Credit Agricole Securities, ING, and Rabo Securities acted as co- managers. MUFG Power & Utilities Group, Credit Agricole, ING Capital, Rabobank, Citi, Barclays, and Bank of Montreal provided the credit facilities, with Credit Agricole acting as administrative agent and MUFG Power & Utilities Group, Credit Agricole, ING Capital, Rabobank, Citi, and Barclays acting as joint lead arrangers.