DOCSLIB.ORG

Intrapreneurship Infrastructure for Industrial Companies Pursuing New Ventures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intrapreneurship Infrastructure for Industrial Companies Pursuing New Ventures Intrapreneurship Infrastructure for Industrial Companies Pursuing New Ventures A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Carlo Stephen Ciliberti, Jr. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 © Copyright 2016 Carlo Stephen Ciliberti, Jr. All Rights Reserved. iii Dedications I dedicate my dissertation work to my family. First and foremost to my parents Janice and Carlo who have supported and encouraged me unconditionally throughout my life. They have instilled my desire to learn and to be the best that I can be through their love, inspiration and examples. The generations that have passed before me have all worked to make the lives of their children better which is what made this opportunity possible. To my wife, Dena, who watched me spend many long nights and weekends juggling school, work and daily activities. The many little acts of kindness like having gluten-free snacks ready and waiting and a big hug mean more to me than she will ever realize. To my daughter Tiffany whose excitement during her own pursuit of her college degree was inspirational and helped fuel my desires to forge ahead. And to my son, Carlo III, who not only stood by my side during two publication presentations working the power points at only 8 and 9 years old, but constantly reminded me through his actions that the true quest of learning starts with pure wonderment. iv Acknowledgments I wish to thank my committee members whose expertise, support, encouragement and time helped me achieve this life-long goal. Thank you Dr. Anthony Deese for your technical proficiency, guidance and assistance with Power and Electrical engineering as well as keeping me focused. Thank you Dr. Stephen Smith for your expertise, time and patience in business modelling, finance and economics. Thank you Dr. Robert Brehm for your guidance with engineering, procurement and construction issues as well as risk management. Thank you Dr. Sabrina Spatari for your skills and expertise in Life Cycle as well as your countless hours with publication assistance and direction. I would also like to thank Dr. Sarah Jordaan for going out of her way to assist with environmental and energy policies as well as her dedication and skills developing manuscripts for publication. Dr. Jordaan’s enthusiasm and zest for achievement are infectious as well as inspiring. A very special thank you to Dr. Joseph Martin, my committee chairman, who not only took me under his wing but also provided his encouragement and friendship every step of the way. Dr. Martin’s mentoring, stories and acts of kindness give true meaning to the word “teacher”. He always left me with renewed dedication and desire to continue throughout the entire process. In addition to my committee members, I would also like to thank Kristen Johnson, Chris Morse, and Jessica Atchison who have greatly contributed to my continuing education and dedication to Drexel University. They’re professionalism, constant support, positive demeanors and unique abilities to achieve results are remarkable. They are the true foundation to a great institution. v Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................xi ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. xx CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: INTRAPRENEURSHIP – LEARNING FROM PAST SUCCESSES .................................... 3 2.1 History of IBM ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 IBM’s Downward Slide ......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Enter Louis Gerstner .............................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Emerging Business Opportunities ........................................................................................ 11 2.5 IBM’s Emerging Business Opportunities Success ............................................................... 14 2.6 Lessons Learned IBM’s EBO Successes .............................................................................. 15 2.7 Comparison to Other Recent Successes ............................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3: INTRAPRENEURSHIP – LEARNING FROM PAST FAILURES ..................................... 18 3.1 Boeing-Vertol’s Mass Transit New Venture ........................................................................ 19 3.2 Boeing-Vertol’s Mass Transit New Venture Failure ............................................................ 22 3.3 Lessons Learned from Boeing-Vertol’s Mass Transit Failure ............................................. 26 3.4 Comparison to Other Recent Failures .................................................................................. 27 CHAPTER 4: CORPORATE INTRAPRENEURSHIP ............................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 5: NATURAL RESOURCES FEASIBILITY STUDY ............................................................. 38 5.1 Wind Energy ........................................................................................................................ 40 5.2 Great Plains Population ........................................................................................................ 42 5.3 Vegetative Feedstock ........................................................................................................... 43 vi 5.4 Animal Feedstock ................................................................................................................ 49 5.5 Algae Feedstock ................................................................................................................... 51 5.5 Woody Biomass ................................................................................................................... 53 5.6 Feasibility Analysis Results ................................................................................................. 55 CHAPTER 6: RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ASSOCIATIONS FEASIBILITY STUDY ......................... 56 6.1 History of REAs ................................................................................................................... 56 6.2 The Grid ............................................................................................................................... 58 6.3 Feasibility Analysis Results ................................................................................................. 62 CHAPTER 7: LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT ECONOICS FEASIBILITY STUDY ....... 63 7.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 63 7.2 Life Cycle Assessment ......................................................................................................... 67 7.3 Land Use Requirements ....................................................................................................... 68 7.3 Methods ................................................................................................................................ 68 7.4 Land and Economic Analysis ............................................................................................... 72 7.5 Wind Farm Results ............................................................................................................... 77 7.6 Anaerobic Digester Results .................................................................................................. 80 7.7 Policy Implications and Conclusion ..................................................................................... 87 CHAPTER 8: INTRAPRENEURSHIP BUSINESS MODEL ..................................................................... 89 8.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 89 8.2 Business Need for an Integrated System .............................................................................. 91 8.3 Integrated Renewable Energy Business Model .................................................................... 92 8.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 96 CHAPTER 9: INTRAPRENEURSHIP RISK MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 98 vii 9.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 98 9.2 SWOT Template ................................................................................................................ 101 9.3 SWOT Example ................................................................................................................. 102 9.4 Intrapreneurship New Venture SWOT Analysis ................................................................ 105 9.5 Using SWOT Analysis Results to Develop a Business Strategy .......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy
    THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF KANSAS WIND ENERGY NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Prepared By: Alan Claus Anderson Britton Gibson Polsinelli Shughart, Vice Chair, Polsinelli Shughart, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group Energy Practice Group Scott W. White, Ph.D. Luke Hagedorn Founder, Polsinelli Shughart, Associate, Kansas Energy Information Network Energy Practice Group ABOUT THE AUTHORS Alan Claus Anderson Alan Claus Anderson is a shareholder attorney and the Vice Chair of Polsinelli Shughart's Energy Practice Group. He has extensive experience representing and serving as lead counsel and outside general counsel to public and private domestic and international companies in the energy industry. He was selected for membership in the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators and has led numerous successful oil and gas acquisitions and joint development projects domestically and internationally. Mr. Anderson also represents developers, lenders, investors and suppliers in renewable energy projects throughout the country that represent more than 3,500 MW in wind and solar projects under development and more than $2 billion in wind and solar projects in operation. Mr. Anderson is actively involved in numerous economic development initiatives in the region including serving as the Chair of the Kansas City Area Development Council's Advanced Energy and Manufacturing Advisory Council. He received his undergraduate degree from Washington State University and his law degree from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (913) 234-7464 or by email at [email protected]. Britton Gibson Britton Gibson is a shareholder attorney in Polsinelli Shughart’s Energy Practice Group and has been responsible for more than $6 billion in energy-related transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Elektroprivrede Hz Herceg Bosne
    Vjesnik JP ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE CHE Čapljina – 30 godina www.ephzhb.ba INFORMATIVNO - STRUČNI LIST / Godina X. / Broj 44 / Mostar, srpanj 2009. Informativno-stručni list, Vjesnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik: JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d., Mostar Vlatko Međugorac Izdaje: Uredništvo: Sektor za odnose s javnošću Vlatko Međugorac, Mira Radivojević, mr. sc. Irina Budimir, Vanda Rajić, Zoran Pavić Ulica dr. Mile Budaka 106A, Mostar tel.: 036 335-727 Naklada: 800 primjeraka faks: 036 335-779 e-mail: [email protected] Tisak: www.ephzhb.ba FRAM-ZIRAL, Mostar Rukopisi i fotografije se ne vraćaju. 2 INFORMATIVNO STRUČNI LIST JAVNOGA PODUZEĆA ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE Sadržaj Novim informacijskim sustavom (SAP-om) do boljega poslovanja .......4 Održana VII. skupština Elektroprivrede HZ HB ................................7 Izvješće neovisnoga revizora ..................................................................8 str. 4 Potpisani ugovori o istražnim radovima na CHE Vrilo.......................10 Elektroprivreda i liberalizacija tržišta ..................................................11 30. rođendan CHE Čapljina ...............................................................13 Posjet njemačkoga veleposlanika i predstavnika KfW banke hidroelektrani Rama ............................................................................14 Primjena novih Općih uvjeta i Pravilnika o priključcima ....................16 HE Mostarsko Blato u izgradnji .........................................................17 str. 7 Uspješno provedena
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2012 Copyright © Frankfurt School of Finance and Management Ggmbh 2012
    GLOBAL TRENDS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT 2012 Copyright © Frankfurt School of Finance and Management gGmbH 2012. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Frankfurt School - UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate Change & Sustainable Energy Finance would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Frankfurt School of Finance & Management gGmbH. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 4 FOREWORD FROM ACHIM STEINER ................................................................................................................ 5 FOREWORD FROM UDO STEFFENS ................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. 7 METHODOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................... 9 KEY FINDINGS ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Conservation Plan for the Goodnoe Hills Wind Facility Klickitat County, Washington
    EAGLE CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE GOODNOE HILLS WIND FACILITY KLICKITAT COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for: PacifiCorp 825 NW Multnomah Boulevard. Portland, Oregon 97232 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 December 9, 2019 Confidential Business Information Goodnoe Hills Wind Facility Eagle Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Corporate Policy ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................... 6 1.3 Project Coordination with Resource Agencies ............................................................ 7 2 SITE SUITABILITY, PRE- AND POST-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS ............................ 9 2.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Site Suitability ............................................................................................................11 2.3 Pre-Construction Surveys ..........................................................................................12 2.3.1 Fixed-point Avian Use Surveys ..............................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • EEI Report March 2013.Pdf
    Transmission Projects: At A Glance Prepared by: Edison Electric Institute MARCH 2013 © 2013 by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). All rights reserved. Published 2013. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system or method, now known or hereinafter invented or adopted, without the express prior written permission of the Edison Electric Institute. Attribution Notice and Disclaimer This work was prepared by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). When used as a reference, attribution to EEI is requested. EEI, any member of EEI, and any person acting on their behalf (a) does not make any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information, advice or recommendations contained in this work, and (b) does not assume and expressly disclaims any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, advice or recommendations contained in this work. The views and opinions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of EEI or any member of EEI. This material and its production, reproduction and distribution by EEI does not imply endorsement of the material. Note: The status of the projects listed in this report was current when submitted to EEI but may have since changed between the time information was initially submitted and date this report was published. Note: Further, information about projects, including their estimated in-service dates, are provided by the respective EEI member developing the project.
    [Show full text]
  • EIA) 2011 December EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2011 December EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File NET State MWh in State MW in Plant ID Plant Name Operator Name MW Installed State Year GENERATION CF* Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CF* CF* (mWh) 6304 Kotzebue Kotzebue Electric Assn Inc 3.0 AK 2011 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57187 Pillar Mountain Wind Project Kodiak Electric Assn Inc 4.5 AK 2011 12,445 31.6% 418 59 1,564 438 936 1,090 1,300 1,429 753 1,154 1,682 1,621 7.5 12,445 12,445 4.5 31.6% 57098 Dry Lake Wind LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 63.0 AZ 2011 124,401 22.5% 4,340 13,601 15,149 18,430 17,297 16,785 7,124 5,735 4,036 6,320 11,154 4,430 57379 Dry Lake Wind II LLC Iberdrola Renewables Inc 65.1 AZ 2011 124,330 21.8% 4,340 13,789 16,021 19,219 16,686 16,398 6,345 5,569 3,743 6,281 11,579 4,360 57775 Kingman 1 Kingman Energy Corp 10.0 AZ 2011 6,848 7.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,026 1,663 2,999 1,160 138.1 255,579 248,731 128.1 22.2% 7526 Solano Wind Sacramento Municipal Util Dist 63.0 CA 2011 221,067 40.1% 6,705 12,275 17,464 27,415 29,296 29,128 24,813 25,928 14,915 11,870 12,233 9,025 10005 Dinosaur Point International Turbine Res Inc 17.4 CA 2011 23,562 15.5% 715 1,308 1,861 2,922 3,123 3,105 2,645 2,763 1,590 1,265 1,304 962 10027 EUIPH Wind Farm EUI Management PH Inc 25.0 CA 2011 46,718 21.3% 1,417 2,594 3,691 5,794 6,191 6,156 5,244 5,479 3,152 2,509 2,585 1,907 10191 Tehachapi Wind Resource I CalWind Resources Inc 8.7 CA 2011 15,402 20.2% 467 855
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Solar Conceptual Framework
    Multiagency Avian-Solar Collaborative Working Group: Stakeholder Workshop Welcome and Overview of Workshop Objectives Dan Boff U.S. Department of Energy SunShot Initiative May 10-11, 2016 Sacramento, California SunShot SunShot Goal: 5 - 6¢/kWh without subsidy. Price A 75% cost reduction by 2020. SunShot Initiative energy.gov/sunshot The Falling Cost of Concentrating Solar The Falling Cost of Utility PV Power The Falling Cost of Commercial PV The Falling Cost of Residential PV energy.gov/sunshot SunShot Program Structure SunShot 2020 Goal energy.gov/sunshot Balance of Systems (Soft Costs) energy.gov/sunshot Objectives of this Meeting Bring together CWG members and stakeholders to: . Share information about the CWG objectives, scope, activities, and timeline . Provide a forum for stakeholders to provide comments relevant to the CWG efforts: – Concerns about avian-solar issues – Relevant existing data and studies – Understanding of avian-solar interactions – Focus of future research – Priorities for research needs – Future activities of the CWG Multiagency CWG Stakeholder Workshop, May 2016 6 Agenda – Day 1 Time Slot Topic 9:30-10:00 Welcome & Workshop Objectives 10:00-10:30 Information About the Multiagency CWG 10:30-10:45 Break 10:45-11:00 Summary of Available Avian-Solar Information 11:00-12:30 Lunch 12:30-2:15 Ongoing Related Initiatives 2:15-2:30 Break 2:30-4:30 Break-out Discussions 4:30-5:00 Wrap Up Multiagency CWG Stakeholder Workshop, May 2016 7 Agenda – Day 2 Time Slot Topic 9:00-9:15 Recap of Day 1 9:15-9:45 Conceptual Framework of Avian-Solar Interactions 9:45-10:15 Agency Management Questions & Related Research Needs 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-12:30 Break-out Discussions 12:30-1:00 Wrap Up & Next Steps Multiagency CWG Stakeholder Workshop, May 2016 8 Logistical Details .
    [Show full text]