Press Release Total Votes Cast for General Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PRESS RELEASE TOTAL VOTES CAST FOR GENERAL ELECTION 2011 Polling Day for General Election 2011 was 7 May 2011 in Singapore. The total number of votes cast in Singapore was 2,057,690 (inclusive of 44,714 rejected votes). Overseas voting was conducted at nine overseas polling stations and the overseas votes were counted on 11 May 2011 at the counting centre at ITE College Central (Balestier). There were 3,453 registered overseas electors from the 26 contested constituencies, out of which, 2,683 turned up to cast their votes. The total number of votes cast for General Election 2011 (i.e. local and overseas votes) is 2,060,373 (inclusive of 44,737 rejected votes). This is 93.18% of the 2,211,102 registered electors in all contested electoral divisions. (See Annex for breakdown by electoral divisions). ISSUED BY: ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT 11 MAY 2011 ANNEX Votes cast for General Election 2011 (by Electoral Divison) *Local and overseas votes *VALID VOTES CAST VALID VOTES CAST (Number) (%) People’s Action Party 59,829 45.28% ALJUNIED Workers’ Party 72,289 54.72% People’s Action Party ANG MO KIO 112,677 69.33% Reform Party 49,851 30.67% People’s Action Party 62,385 56.93% BISHAN-TOA Singapore PAYOH People’s Party 47,205 43.07% People’s Action Party 20,375 66.27% BUKIT PANJANG Singapore Democratic Party 10,372 33.73% National Solidarity CHUA CHU Party 56,885 38.80% KANG People’s Action Party 89,710 61.20% People’s Action Party 59,992 54.83% EAST COAST Workers’ Party 49,429 45.17% People’s Action Party 48,773 60.08% HOLLAND- Singapore BUKIT TIMAH Democratic Party 32,406 39.92% People’s Action Party 18,156 70.61% HONG KAH Singapore NORTH People’s Party 7,556 29.39% People’s Action Party 8,065 35.20% HOUGANG Workers’ Party 14,850 64.80% People’s Action Party 9,666 51.02% JOO CHIAT Workers’ Party 9,278 48.98% National Solidarity JURONG Party 37,786 33.04% People’s Action Party 76,595 66.96% National Solidarity MARINE Party 59,926 43.36% PARADE People’s Action Party 78,286 56.64% People’s MOULMEIN- Action Party 44,886 58.55% KALLANG Workers’ Party 31,773 41.45% National Solidarity MOUNTBATTEN Party 8,461 41.38% People’s Action Party 11,985 58.62% People’s Action Party 80,740 58.40% NEE SOON Workers’ Party 57,523 41.60% People’s Action Party 100,493 64.79% PASIR RIS- Singapore PUNGGOL Democratic Alliance 54,601 35.21% National Solidarity PIONEER Party 9,437 39.27% People’s Action Party 14,593 60.73% People’s Action Party 7, 992 50.36% POTONG PASIR Singapore People’s Party 7, 878 49.64% People’s Action Party 16,994 54.54% Singapore PUNGGOL EAST Democratic Alliance 1,387 4.45% Workers’ Party 12,777 41.01% National Solidarity RADIN MAS Party 9,123 32.90% People’s Action Party 18,609 67.10% People’s Action Party 84,252 63.90% SEMBAWANG Singapore Democratic Party 47,605 36.10% People’s SENGKANG Action Party 14,689 58.11% WEST Workers’ Party 10,591 41.89% National Solidarity TAMPINES Party 54,381 42.78% People’s Action Party 72,728 57.22% TANJONG UNCONTESTED PAGAR People’s WEST COAST Action Party 72,563 66.57% Reform Party 36,443 33.43% National Solidarity WHAMPOA Party 6,683 33.90% People’s Action Party 13,028 66.10% People’s Action Party 14,093 66.86% YUHUA Singapore Democratic Party 6,986 33.14% .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan
Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University.
[Show full text]
Community Policing in Singapore
COMMUNITY POLICING IN SINGAPORE by Mark Low Jian Neng A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Geography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (VANCOUVER) April 2012 ©Mark Low Jian Neng, 2012 ABSTRACT This thesis is devoted towards unpacking how community policing has been managed as a state discourse by the Singapore Police Force. Firstly, community policing is located within the historical context of a modernising Singapore. This begins with the need for crime prevention that was disseminated through decentralised neighbourhood police posts in the 1980s. With economic restructuring in the 1990s, community policing was rescaled to meet the changing demography of the population. Following an enhanced deployment of counter-terrorism discourse in the wake of 9/11, community policing was re-invented as part of a (re)bordering strategy to safeguard territorial sovereignty and social cohesion. Secondly, the methodology of community policing is visualised through the changing frames of the state-produced docu- drama, Crime Watch. As a television programme that has consistently raked in high viewership numbers for 25 years, Crime Watch texts deserve their fair share of critical scrutiny to reveal the means of community engagement by the state police. Thirdly, the personal networks of Volunteer Special Constables are studied for the insights that they can reveal into the work of policing one’s community. Personal interviews with sixteen volunteers provide the empirical data for analysis. Volunteers have committed much time and effort into performing the work of volunteer police officers. Mediating the boundaries between the police and the public, these volunteers translate community policing into practice in complicated ways that have not been adequately documented.
[Show full text]
200708 BT Ge2020 in Numbers
BT Infographics GE2020 Election by the numbers Social media platforms have been abuzz with virtual campaigning efforts as polling day draws close, taking the place of physical rallies that were among highlights of past elections in pre-pandemic times. With political parties pushed into the digital age, The Business Times looks at how the GE2020 has unfolded in cyberspace. BY CLAUDIA TAN & NATALIE CHOY VOTERS 93 2,653,942 SEATS CONTESTED 0.5% 0.5% CONSTITUENCIES PPP Independent FOLLOWER GROWTH Number of Facebook followers gained per day Largest GRC Smallest SMC 2.6% Ang Mo Kio Potong Pasir 2.6% SDA 185,465 electors 19,740 electors 2.6% RDU People’s Action Party SPP Average growth rate: 2.3% 3.1% 1,332 RP 1,347 338 338 653 5.2% 516 NSP July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 July 5 July 6 Workers’ Party GRCs: 17 SMCs: 14 5.2% Average growth rate: 9.5% New: Sengkang New: Kebun Baru, Yio Chu Kang, PV Marymount, Punggol West 2,699 2,098 2,421 1,474 1,271 1,336 July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 July 5 July 6 5.7% 40 74 118 152 48.4% Female New 192PSP Male SHARE-OF-VOICE SDP Candidates PAP Progress Singapore Party Based on content generated by political Average growth rate: 22.4% parties on digital media platforms 1,539 1,539 1,119 0.19% 2.29% 932 836 776 People’s Power Party Singapore Democratic 10.9% July 1 July 2 July 3 July 4 July 5 July 6 1.72% Alliance WP Peoples Voice Singapore Democratic Party 1.48% 1.60% Average growth rate: 5.6% Reform Party Singapore People’s Party 813 1.46% 498 558 565 503 540 National Solidarity Party 12.5% 0.67% PSP July 1 July 2
[Show full text]
Major Vote Swing
BT INFOGRAPHICS GE2015 Major vote swing Bukit Batok Sengkang West SMC SMC Sembawang Punggol East GRC SMC Hougang SMC Marsiling- Nee Soon Yew Tee GRC GRC Chua Chu Kang Ang Mo Kio Holland- GRC GRC Pasir Ris- Bukit Punggol GRC Hong Kah Timah North SMC GRC Aljunied Tampines Bishan- GRC GRC Toa Payoh East Coast GRC GRC West Coast Marine GRC Parade Tanjong Pagar GRC GRC Fengshan SMC MacPherson SMC Mountbatten SMC FOUR-MEMBER GRC Jurong GRC Potong Pasir SMC Chua Chu Kang Registered voters: 119,931; Pioneer Yuhua Bukit Panjang Radin Mas Jalan Besar total votes cast: 110,191; rejected votes: 2,949 SMC SMC SMC SMC SMC 76.89% 23.11% (84,731 votes) (25,460 votes) PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY (83 SEATS) WORKERS’ PARTY (6 SEATS) PEOPLE’S PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY POWER PARTY Gan Kim Yong Goh Meng Seng Low Yen Ling Lee Tze Shih SIX-MEMBER GRC Yee Chia Hsing Low Wai Choo Zaqy Mohamad Syafarin Sarif Ang Mo Kio Pasir Ris-Punggol 2011 winner: People’s Action Party (61.20%) Registered voters: 187,771; Registered voters: 187,396; total votes cast: 171,826; rejected votes: 4,887 total votes cast: 171,529; rejected votes: 5,310 East Coast Registered voters: 99,118; 78.63% 21.37% 72.89% 27.11% total votes cast: 90,528; rejected votes: 1,008 (135,115 votes) (36,711 votes) (125,021 votes) (46,508 votes) 60.73% 39.27% (54,981 votes) (35,547 votes) PEOPLE’S THE REFORM PEOPLE’S SINGAPORE ACTION PARTY PARTY ACTION PARTY DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE Ang Hin Kee Gilbert Goh J Puthucheary Abu Mohamed PEOPLE’S WORKERS’ Darryl David Jesse Loo Ng Chee Meng Arthero Lim ACTION PARTY PARTY Gan
[Show full text]
Definition of Family Foundation 34
A acsep: knowledge for good i ACSEP The Asia Centre for Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy (ACSEP) is an academic research centre at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School, staffed by an international multi-disciplinary research team. Formally established in April 2011, the Centre has embraced a geographic focus spanning 34 nations and special administrative regions across Asia. ACSEP aims to advance understanding and the impactful practice of social entrepreneurship and philan- thropy in Asia through research and education. Its working papers are authored by academia and in-house researchers, who provide thought leadership and offer insights into key issues and concerns confronting socially driven organisations. For full details on ACSEP’s work, please see http://bschool.nus.edu/acsep ii About the Author Dr June Lee Dr June Lee is principal consultant at Heiritage Governance Advisory Pte. Ltd. and Honorary Research Fellow at Asia Centre for Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy (ACSEP), NUS Business School. She works with families across Asia to preserve family harmony and continuity of family wealth based on core family values, and to prepare for orderly business leadership succession. Her work includes helping families draft a family charter, define the criteria for employment in the family business, and establish the family council and various governance frameworks and structures for the family foundation and the family office. Dr Lee is interested in the impact of family factors on the strategy and sustainability of family business, wealth and philanthropy. She believes agreement based on shared core values and a vision that provides space for individual dreams holds the best possibility for family harmony and order, and continued strength of the family and its shared undertakings and enterprises.
[Show full text]
One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
[Show full text]
The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands Hosts a Series Of
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THE SHOPPES AT MARINA BAY SANDS HOSTS A SERIES OF EXCITING FASHION EVENTS AS IT PREPARES FOR THE INAUGURAL WOMEN‟S FASHION WEEK 2011 SINGAPORE WFW2011 Singapore Exclusive Haute Couture Exhibition and VIP Fashion Night at The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands are just some of the treats for shoppers Singapore, 6 October 2011 – The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, the title sponsor of the inaugural Women‟s Fashion Week 2011 (WFW 2011) Singapore, announces a series of exclusive fashion events as a build up to the most anticipated fashion event of the year. Co-organized by Fide Multimedia and SENATUS, WFW 2011 Singapore will present a season of prêt-a-porter shows from 21 to 23 October and exclusive shows which will showcase Parisian Haute Couture in Singapore from 26 to 30 October. A prelude to the Haute Couture Week is the WFW 2011 Singapore Haute Couture Exhibition. From 6 to 31 October, an exclusive exhibition featuring dozens of Haute Couture creations, retrospective and current, from various Couturiers will be on display. The collection will showcase the rarefied craftsmanship that is inherent in Haute Couture. The exhibition opens at The Shoppes‟ Grand Colonnade South, and will be on display throughout the mall at five locations over the entire month. A second initiative designed especially to thank shoppers for their support and provide an exciting and distinct shopping environment is the WFW 2011 VIP Fashion Night at The Shoppes. Held on 13 October, with free champagne flowing just for our shoppers at pop up bars throughout the mall and in-store discounts at over 120 boutiques offering up to 70 percent discount, for just one night, this will be a shopping extravaganza not to be missed, - more - At least 30 models will also make shopping selection easier as they showcase the season‟s latest fashion apparels, accessories and reveal the hottest beauty and hair tricks from the top hair and make-up salons at The Shoppes.
[Show full text]
Ts Ge Whitepaper
Through The Social Lens: General Elections 2020 Real Time Real Information OVERVIEW PERSONALITIES Which politicians are gaining the most attention on social media? POLITICAL PARTIES What are the top five political parties people are talking about? ATTRIBUTES ASSOCIATION Which attributes are each political party associated with? CHANNELS Where are the conversations happening? Disclaimer: This publication does not reflect any political opinions of T r u e s c o p e . Data coverage is based upon the online and social channels in SG since 15 June 2020 (updated as of 24 June 2020) PERSONALITIES Which politicians are getting the most attention on social media? PAP Opposition • PM Lee’s announcement of GE [1][2] • Dispute between Pritam Singh, Alfian Sa’at by • Leong Sze Hian Lawsuit [1][2] Dr Tan Wu Meng [1][2] • Pritam Singh’s response to criticism [1] • DPM Heng speaks on 'Emerging • CSJ to not lead a GRC and contest in Bukit Batok Stronger Together’ [1][2] SMC [1][2] • CSJ did not congratulate Paul Tambyah’s new appointment [1][2] • Tan Wu Meng’s criticism of Pritam • Paul Tambyah to lead International Society of Singh’s support of Alfian Sa’at [1][2] Infectious Diseases [1][2] • Paul Tambyah’s response to Singaporean’s not wanting to take up “dirty jobs” [1] • Minister Chan announcing paycuts for senior civil servants [1][2] • PSP to enter 3-cornered fight in West Coast • Minister Chan’s national broadcast [1][2] GRC [1][2] • Thread discussing YouTube Videos by PSP [1] • Minister Teo’s statement of the ‘full effects' • Workers' Party said
[Show full text]
Uncornering Speakers: on Political Speech in Singapore
The Avery Review Robin Hartanto Honggare – Uncornering Speakers: On Political Speech in Singapore Sometime after its designation in 2000, the Speakers’ Corner—the only Citation: Robin Hartanto Honggare, “Uncornering Speakers: On Political Speech in Singapore” in the state-authorized space in Singapore where public speech is allowed without Avery Review 22 (March 2017), http://averyreview. permit—was criticized for being purely a gesture. Prominent activists, scholars, com/issues/22/uncornering-speakers. and nongovernmental organizations condemned the demarcated space as, among other things, “an exercise in tokenism;” “an example of the familiar tac- tic of allowing limited liberalization while retaining tight control;” and “a window dressing attempt of the government to deceive the international community.” [1] Li-ann Thio, “Singapore: Regulating Political Speech and the Commitment ‘To Build a Democratic [1] Intersecting with the emergence of virtual political forums and blogs, the Society,’” International Journal of Constitutional Law, corner was further suspected to be an instrument to lure Internet-based dissent vol. 1, no. 3 (July 1, 2003): 522; Joshua Kurlantzick, “Love My Nanny,” World Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 4 out into the open. [2] (2000): 69; Yap Swee Seng, “Let Singaporean Voices The critique was not without some validity. The space was operated Be Heard,” Think Centre, link. under tight regulations, denying its claim to freeness. To deliver a speech at the space, you—who first of all must be a Singaporean—were required to register in [2] Terence Lee, “Media Governmentality in Singapore,” in Democracy, Media and Law in advance at the adjacent police post, a process that includes stating your topic.
[Show full text]
The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – the Primary Impediment to Coalition Building
Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School – Distinction Theses Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public (Undergraduate) Affairs Spring 2014 The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building Brian Steinberg [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/distinction Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Steinberg, Brian, "The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building" (2014). Maxwell School – Distinction Theses (Undergraduate). 4. https://surface.syr.edu/distinction/4 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell School – Distinction Theses (Undergraduate) by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building A Capstone Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Brian Steinberg Candidate for B.A. Degree and Renée Crown University Honors May 2014 Honors Capstone Project in Political Science Capstone Project Advisor: _______________________ Professor Jonathan Hanson Capstone Project Reader: _______________________ Professor Mathew Cleary Honors Director: _______________________ Stephen Kuusisto, Director Date: 5/1/2014 Abstract This thesis studies opposition party behavior in competitive authoritarian regimes using the Singapore 2011 general election as a case study. The study asks, what is the primary reason Worker’s Party, the strongest opposition party in Singapore, did not pursue the formation of a pre-electoral coalition? I analyzed the pre-existing theories and conducted fieldwork, interviewing opposition party leaders, academics and activists, to ascertain a direct impediment and not just a background condition to coalition building.
[Show full text]
Social Democratic Parties in Southeast Asia - Chances and Limits
Social Democratic Parties in Southeast Asia - Chances and Limits Norbert von Hofmann*, Consultant, Januar 2009 1. Introduction The people of Southeast Asia, both masses and elites alike, looked for many years foremost up to the United States of America (US) as a role model state. However, the war on terrorism waged by the current US administration linked with cuts in civil liberties and human rights violations, especially the illegal detention and torture of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, has in the eyes of many Southeast Asians considerably discredited the US concept of liberal democracy. Furthermore, the US propagated classical economic liberalism has failed to deliver the most basic human necessities to the poor, and the current food and energy crisis as well as the latest bank crisis in the US prove that neo-liberalism is itself in trouble. The result of neo-liberalism, dominated by trade and financial liberalization, has been one of deepening inequality, also and especially in the emerging economies of Southeast Asia. Falling poverty in one community, or one country or region, is corresponding with deepening poverty elsewhere. The solution can therefore not be more liberalization, but rather more thought and more policy space for countries to pursue alternative options such as “Social Democracy”. The sudden call even from the most hard-core liberals for more regulations and interventions by the state in the financial markets and the disgust and anger of working people everywhere as their taxes being used to bail out those whose greed, irresponsibility and abuses have brought the world’s financial markets to the brink of collapse, proof that the era of “turbo-capitalism” is over.
[Show full text]
Queer Singapore
Queer Singapore Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures Edited by Audrey Yue and Jun Zubillaga-Pow Hong Kong University Press 14/F Hing Wai Centre 7 Tin Wan Praya Road Aberdeen Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © Hong Kong University Press 2012 ISBN 978-988-8139-33-0 (Hardback) ISBN 978-988-8139-34-7 (Paperback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed and bound by Liang Yu Printing Factory Ltd. in Hong Kong, China Contents Contributors vii Acknowledgements xi Introduction: Queer Singapore: A Critical Introduction 1 Audrey Yue Part 1 Cultural Citizenship and Queer Politics 1. How to Bring Singaporeans Up Straight (1960s–1990s) 29 Aaron K. H. Ho 2. Enforcement of 377A: Entering the Twilight Zone 45 Michael Hor 3. Sexual Vigilantes Invade Gender Spaces: Religion and Sexuality 59 in the AWARE Saga Laurence Wai-Teng Leong 4. “Oi, Recruit! Wake Up Your Idea!”: Homosexuality and Cultural 71 Citizenship in the Singaporean Military Chris K. K. Tan 5. Transnational Lesbian Identities: Lessons from Singapore? 83 Shawna Tang 6. Both Contagion and Cure: Queer Politics in the Global 97 City-State Simon Obendorf Part 2 Queer Media Cultures 7. Photo Essay: A Brief History of Early Gay Venues in Singapore 117 Roy Tan 8.
[Show full text]