One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R. Willam Liddle, Professor Jeremy Wallace, and Professor Marcus Kurtz, who have been very helpful in assisting me in the writing of this dissertation. Through the mentorship of Professors Liddle and Wallace, I was able to identify the research question and the cases to test my question. Professor Liddle and Professor Wallace have been very patient with me and offered much intellectual and practical help to coach me to develop this dissertation beyond my imagination. Professor Kurtz also gave me much valuable advice with scholarly insight to help me formulate the ideas for this dissertation. I also thank many other professors and friends who have coached me and gave me valuable advice: Professor John Wright, Professor Mary Cooper and Professor Irfan Nooruddin from The Ohio State University, Professor Jon Quah from the National University of Singapore, Professor Eugene Tan Kheng Boon from Singapore Management University, Professor Selina Lim and Professor Tan Ngoh Tiong from the Singapore Institute of Management, Professor Kevin Joseph Khoo from the Singapore National Archives, Professor Jaushieh Wu from the National Chengchi University in Taiwan, Professor Huaien Peng from Shixin University in Taiwan, Professor Chen-shen Yen from the National Chengchi University of Taiwan, Tsz-ming Or from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Professor Qingyan Shang from New York Univeristy Buffalo, and Alodie Lim. iv I thank the following institutions and individuals for their generosity in supporting me financially for my research trip to Asia: the Alumni Graduate Grant for Research Support (AGGRS) from The Ohio State University, the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD), Sophia Lee, and Ronald and Alice Han. Their financial support has been indispensable to help this dissertation to come into being. I thank National Chengchi University (NCCU) in Taiwan and TFD for giving me visiting scholarship positions so I could do research in Taiwan. Both NCCU and TFD have offered practical help for my research in Taiwan. I would like to thank the National Singapore University, Chinese University of Hong Kong, and National Chengchi University in Taiwan for allowing me to use their library systems. I thank many individuals who helped to me in the logistics for my research: Professor Herb Weisberg, Professor Alex Thompson, Retta Semones from the Political Science Department of The Ohio State University, Delphine Thomlin, Li-fang Yang, Chi-yu Huang and many other friends whose name I and the Lord will remember. I thank a group of friends who has supported me over the last year with their faithful prayers. I had not made much progress in my research before August 2010. When my friends supported me with prayers starting in July 2010, I started to make tremendous progress in the research. My adviser called my progress since last August a miracle. A year ago, I would not have imagined that I could ever compose a dissertation. But due to their prayers and the help of Jesus Christ, I was able to complete my research and write a high-quality dissertation in a year. The Lord and I will remember their names. I also thank my parents, who have been very supportive of my academic dreams. They made sacrifices to support me in college. I have stayed in the US for nine years and could not v repay their sacrifices with financial or physical support, as children in China could do. But my parents bore the sacrifice and patiently supported my dream for nine years. Most of all, I thank the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the source, the strength and the reason for this dissertation. Without the Lord’s calling and his promise, I would not have joined the PhD program and would not have finished my dissertation. Without the Lord’s help, I would never have been able to conduct my research trip and finish this paper. Without His wisdom and strength, I could not have made miraculous progress over the last one year. Finally, I thank all the political leaders in the world whose vision is to implement justice, and advocate wellbeing of the weak, the poor and the oppressed. “What does the LORD require of you? But to act justly, love mercy and walk humbly with your God.” (Micah 6:8) vi Vita July 1993 .............................................................. No. 2 Middle High, Yichang, China 1997 ..................................................................... B.A. English, Wuhan University 1997-1998 ............................................................ Manager Assistance, Shenzhen Huafeng Co. 1998-1999 ............................................................ Lawyer, King and Wood Law Firm 2000-2002 ........................................................... Chinese Legal Consultant, Blakes, Cussles and Braden (Canada) Law Firm 2004 ..................................................................... M.A. Political Science, Villanova University 2004 to present ................................................... Graduate Teaching Associate, Political Science Department, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Political Science vii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... ivi Vita .................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vxii Chapter 1: Question, Theory and Methodology ............................................................................. 1 Chapter 2: Comparison of Singapore and Taiwan ......................................................................... 39 Chapter 3: Regime Types and Their Origin .................................................................................. 114 Chapter 4: Case Study of Singapore 1961-1963 ......................................................................... 194 Chapter 5: Case Study of Taiwan 1980-2000 ............................................................................... 284 Chapter 6: Conclusion and Theoretical Implication ..................................................................... 383 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 405 viii List of Tables Table 2.1 Singapore and Taiwan Winning Coalition Size Scores ................................................... 64 Table 2.2 People’s Request to the PAP Branch Offices in 1968 .................................................... 90 Table 2.3 The KMT Service Stations Enrollment for Individual Services 1987 .............................. 90 Table 2.4 The KMT’s Share of Seats 1950-1986 Average Data ..................................................... 97 Table 3.1 Statistics of Taiwan Central and Local Welfare Expenditure 1982 and 1988.............. 144 Table 3.2 Taiwan Housing Expenditure Statistics 1952-1975 ..................................................... 146 Table 3.3 The CPIB Statistics 1952-2002 ..................................................................................... 159 Table 3.4 Taiwan and Singapore’s Fiscal Structue 1972-1998 Average Score ............................ 169 Table 4.1 The CPIB Statistics 1952-2002 ..................................................................................... 197 Table 4.2 1963 Singapore General
Recommended publications
  • Singapore, July 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan
    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rule of Law and Urban Development
    The Rule of Law and Urban Development The transformation of Singapore from a struggling, poor country into one of the most affluent nations in the world—within a single generation—has often been touted as an “economic miracle”. The vision and pragmatism shown by its leaders has been key, as has its STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS notable political stability. What has been less celebrated, however, while being no less critical to Singapore’s urban development, is the country’s application of the rule of law. The rule of law has been fundamental to Singapore’s success. The Rule of Law and Urban Development gives an overview of the role played by the rule of law in Singapore’s urban development over the past 54 years since independence. It covers the key principles that characterise Singapore’s application of the rule of law, and reveals deep insights from several of the country’s eminent urban pioneers, leaders and experts. It also looks at what ongoing and future The Rule of Law and Urban Development The Rule of Law developments may mean for the rule of law in Singapore. The Rule of Law “ Singapore is a nation which is based wholly on the Rule of Law. It is clear and practical laws and the effective observance and enforcement and Urban Development of these laws which provide the foundation for our economic and social development. It is the certainty which an environment based on the Rule of Law generates which gives our people, as well as many MNCs and other foreign investors, the confidence to invest in our physical, industrial as well as social infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Museum Roundtable
    P. 2 P. 3 Introducing the Hello! Museum Roundtable Singapore has a whole bunch of museums you might not have heard The Museum Roundtable (MR) is a network formed by of and that’s one of the things we the National Heritage Board to support Singapore’s museum-going culture. We believe in the development hope to change with this guide. of a museum community which includes audience, museum practitioners and emerging professionals. We focus on supporting the training of people who work in We’ve featured the (over 50) museums and connecting our members to encourage members of Singapore’s Museum discussion, collaboration and partnership. Roundtable and also what you Our members comprise over 50 public and private can get up to in and around them. museums and galleries spanning the subjects of history and culture, art and design, defence and technology In doing so, we hope to help you and natural science. With them, we hope to build a ILoveMuseums plan a great day out that includes community that champions the role and importance of museums in society. a museum, perhaps even one that you’ve never visited before. Go on, they might surprise you. International Museum Day #museumday “Museums are important means of cultural exchange, enrichment of cultures and development of mutual understanding, cooperation and peace among peoples.” — International Council of Museums (ICOM) On (and around) 18 May each year, the world museum community commemorates International Museum Day (IMD), established in 1977 to spread the word about the icom.museum role of museums in society. Be a part of the celebrations – look out for local IMD events, head to a museum to relax, learn and explore.
    [Show full text]
  • Folio No: DM.086 Folio Title: Press Releases Content Description: Press Releases, Speeches, Correspondences and Radio Transcripts
    Folio No: DM.086 Folio Title: Press Releases Content Description: Press releases, speeches, correspondences and radio transcripts. Includes copy of correspondences with Lee Kuan Yew on citizenship and finance, letter to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra on merger and citizenship, submissions on the opinion made by KM Byrne on the allegations of Dr Goh Keng Swee on David Marshall as Chief Minister, correspondence with Lee Kuan Yew re: infiltration of Communists in the Workers' Party and speech of Lee Kuan Yew before the UN Committee on Colonialism ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS First Report to Anson of your Assemblyman David DM.086.001 30/7/1961 Digitized Open Marshall at a Public Meeting on 30 Jul 1961 Copies of correspondence between the Chairman of DM.086.002 7/12/1961 Workers' Party and the Prime Minister re: questions Digitized Open raised on citizenship and finance in the White Paper Copy of letter from the Prime Minister with further DM.086.003 16/12/1961 Digitized Open clarification on DM.86.2 Workers' Party Mass Rally: Second Report to Anson by DM.086.004 17/12/1961 Digitized Open David Marshall, Chairman Letter to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra giving opinion of Singapore's hardening attitude against the White Paper proposals with a suggestion on how to make it more DM.086.005 19/12/1961 Digitized Open acceptable, and request to meet up to discuss this suggestion which has been made to the Prime Minister of Singapore Press release of a letter from the Workers' Party to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, enclosing
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    14 bus time schedule & line map 14 Bedok Int ↔ Clementi Int View In Website Mode The 14 bus line (Bedok Int ↔ Clementi Int) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Bedok Int: 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM (2) Clementi Int: 5:30 AM - 11:31 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 14 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 14 bus arriving. Direction: Bedok Int 14 bus Time Schedule 74 stops Bedok Int Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM Monday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM Clementi Ave 3 - Clementi Int (17009) Clementi Bus Interchange, Singapore Tuesday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM Clementi Ave 3 - Ntuc Fairprice (17239) Wednesday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM 451 Clementi Avenue 3, Singapore Thursday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM C'Wealth Ave West - Blk 365 (17159) Friday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM 365 Clementi Avenue 2, Singapore Saturday 5:45 AM - 11:21 PM C'Wealth Ave West - Sch Of Science & Tech (19049) 1 Technology Drive, Singapore C'Wealth Ave West - Dover Stn Exit B (19039) 14 bus Info 200 Commonwealth Avenue West, Singapore Direction: Bedok Int Stops: 74 C'Wealth Ave West - Opp SP Sma (19029) Trip Duration: 130 min Line Summary: Clementi Ave 3 - Clementi Int C'Wealth Ave West - Blk 27 (19019) (17009), Clementi Ave 3 - Ntuc Fairprice (17239), 29A Ghim Moh Link, Singapore C'Wealth Ave West - Blk 365 (17159), C'Wealth Ave West - Sch Of Science & Tech (19049), C'Wealth Ave C'Wealth Ave West - Blk 15 (11199) West - Dover Stn Exit B (19039), C'Wealth Ave West - Opp SP Sma (19029), C'Wealth Ave West - Blk 27 Nth Buona Vista Rd - Buona
    [Show full text]
  • Goh Chok Tong V Chee Soon Juan [2003] SGHC 79
    Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan [2003] SGHC 79 Case Number : Suit 1460/2001 Decision Date : 04 April 2003 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : MPH Rubin J Counsel Name(s) : Davinder Singh SC, Hri Kumar and Nicolas Tang (Drew & Napier LLC) for the plaintiff/respondent; Defendant/appellant in person Parties : Goh Chok Tong — Chee Soon Juan Civil Procedure – Pleadings – Defence – Particulars of defence of duress not pleaded – Effect on defendant's case Civil Procedure – Summary judgment – Whether to set aside summary judgment and grant defendant leave to defend claim – Whether defendant had real or bona fide defence Contract – Discharge – Breach – Whether intimidation a defence to breach of contract of compromise Contract – Duress – Illegitimate pressure – Whether threat to enforce one's legal rights could amount to duress Tort – Defamation – Defamatory statements – Republication – Words republished by mass media – Whether defendant liable for republication Tort – Defamation – Defamatory statements – Whether defamatory in natural and ordinary meaning or by way of innuendo 1 This was an appeal by Dr Chee Soon Juan to judge-in-chambers from the decision of Senior Assistant Registrar Mr Toh Han Li (‘the SAR’) granting interlocutory judgment with damages (including aggravated damages) to be assessed in a defamation action brought by the respondent, Mr Goh Chok Tong. Mr Goh is, and was at all material times, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore. On 25 October 2001, Mr Goh, as a candidate of the People’s Action Party (‘PAP’), was returned unopposed as a Member of Parliament for Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency (‘GRC’) in the 2001 General Elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Health List of Approved Offsite Providers for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Tests for COVID-19
    Ministry of Health List of Approved Offsite Providers for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Tests for COVID-19 List updated as at 26 February 2021. Service Provider Name of Location Address Service Provided Partnering Lab Acumed Offsite PCR Swab Parkway Laboratory Services Shangri-La Hotel 22 Orange Grove Rd, Singapore 258350 Medical and Serology Ltd Group Parkway Laboratory Services St Engineering Marine 16 Benoi Road S(629889) Ltd Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd Offsite PCR Swab Ally Health Q Squared Solutions Bukit Batok North N4 432A Bukit Batok West Avenue 8, S(651432) and Serology (In Laboratory Partnership C882 6A Raeburn Park, S(088703) National Public Health With Jaga- Laboratory Me) Sands Expo And Convention Centre 10 Bayfront Ave, Singapore 018956 Parkway Laboratory Services 1 Harbour Front Ave Level 2 Keppel Bay Tower, Singapore Ltd Keppel Office 098632 Offsite PCR Swab 40 Scotts Road, #22-01 Environment Building, Singapore PUB Office 228231 The Istana 35 Orchard Rd, Singapore 238823 One Marina Boulevard 1 Marina Boulevard S018989 Rasa Sentosa Singapore 101 Siloso Road S098970 Bethesda MWOC @ Ponggol Northshore 501A Ponggol Way, Singapore 828646 Offsite PCR Swab Innovative Diagnostics Pte Ltd Medical MWOC @ CCK 10A Lorong Bistari, Singapore 688186 And Serology Centre MWOC @ Eunos 10A Eunos Road 1, Singapore 408523 Services MWOC @ Tengah A 1A Tengah Road, Singapore 698813 Page 1 of 85 MWOC @ Tengah B; 3A Tengah Road, Singapore 698814 Parkway Laboratory Services Hotel Chancellor 28 Cavenagh / Orchard Road, Singapore 229635 Limited
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's Chinese-Speaking and Their Perspectives on Merger
    Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies, Volume 5, 2011-12 南方華裔研究雜志, 第五卷, 2011-12 “Flesh and Bone Reunite as One Body”: Singapore’s Chinese- speaking and their Perspectives on Merger ©2012 Thum Ping Tjin* Abstract Singapore’s Chinese speakers played the determining role in Singapore’s merger with the Federation. Yet the historiography is silent on their perspectives, values, and assumptions. Using contemporary Chinese- language sources, this article argues that in approaching merger, the Chinese were chiefly concerned with livelihoods, education, and citizenship rights; saw themselves as deserving of an equal place in Malaya; conceived of a new, distinctive, multiethnic Malayan identity; and rejected communist ideology. Meanwhile, the leaders of UMNO were intent on preserving their electoral dominance and the special position of Malays in the Federation. Finally, the leaders of the PAP were desperate to retain power and needed the Federation to remove their political opponents. The interaction of these three factors explains the shape, structure, and timing of merger. This article also sheds light on the ambiguity inherent in the transfer of power and the difficulties of national identity formation in a multiethnic state. Keywords: Chinese-language politics in Singapore; History of Malaya; the merger of Singapore and the Federation of Malaya; Decolonisation Introduction Singapore’s merger with the Federation of Malaya is one of the most pivotal events in the country’s history. This process was determined by the ballot box – two general elections, two by-elections, and a referendum on merger in four years. The centrality of the vote to this process meant that Singapore’s Chinese-speaking1 residents, as the vast majority of the colony’s residents, played the determining role.
    [Show full text]
  • The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore
    Damien Cheong ____________________________________________________________ Selling Security: The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore DAMIEN CHEONG Abstract The Internal Security Act (ISA) of Singapore has been transformed from a se- curity law into an effective political instrument of the Singapore government. Although the government's use of the ISA for political purposes elicited negative reactions from the public, it was not prepared to abolish, or make amendments to the Act. In the wake of September 11 and the international campaign against terrorism, the opportunity to (re)legitimize the government's use of the ISA emerged. This paper argues that despite the ISA's seeming importance in the fight against terrorism, the absence of explicit definitions of national security threats, either in the Act itself, or in accompanying legislation, renders the ISA susceptible to political misuse. Keywords: Internal Security Act, War on Terrorism. People's Action Party, Jemaah Islamiyah. Introduction In 2001/2002, the Singapore government arrested and detained several Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) operatives under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for engaging in terrorist activities. It was alleged that the detained operatives were planning to attack local and foreign targets in Singa- pore. The arrests outraged human rights groups, as the operation was reminiscent of the government's crackdown on several alleged Marxist conspirators in1987. Human rights advocates were concerned that the current detainees would be dissuaded from seeking legal counsel and subjected to ill treatment during their period of incarceration (Tang 1989: 4-7; Frank et al. 1991: 5-99). Despite these protests, many Singaporeans expressed their strong support for the government's actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Title
    Songs by Title Title Artist Title Artist #1 Goldfrapp (Medley) Can't Help Falling Elvis Presley John Legend In Love Nelly (Medley) It's Now Or Never Elvis Presley Pharrell Ft Kanye West (Medley) One Night Elvis Presley Skye Sweetnam (Medley) Rock & Roll Mike Denver Skye Sweetnam Christmas Tinchy Stryder Ft N Dubz (Medley) Such A Night Elvis Presley #1 Crush Garbage (Medley) Surrender Elvis Presley #1 Enemy Chipmunks Ft Daisy Dares (Medley) Suspicion Elvis Presley You (Medley) Teddy Bear Elvis Presley Daisy Dares You & (Olivia) Lost And Turned Whispers Chipmunk Out #1 Spot (TH) Ludacris (You Gotta) Fight For Your Richard Cheese #9 Dream John Lennon Right (To Party) & All That Jazz Catherine Zeta Jones +1 (Workout Mix) Martin Solveig & Sam White & Get Away Esquires 007 (Shanty Town) Desmond Dekker & I Ciara 03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay Z Ft Beyonce & I Am Telling You Im Not Jennifer Hudson Going 1 3 Dog Night & I Love Her Beatles Backstreet Boys & I Love You So Elvis Presley Chorus Line Hirley Bassey Creed Perry Como Faith Hill & If I Had Teddy Pendergrass HearSay & It Stoned Me Van Morrison Mary J Blige Ft U2 & Our Feelings Babyface Metallica & She Said Lucas Prata Tammy Wynette Ft George Jones & She Was Talking Heads Tyrese & So It Goes Billy Joel U2 & Still Reba McEntire U2 Ft Mary J Blige & The Angels Sing Barry Manilow 1 & 1 Robert Miles & The Beat Goes On Whispers 1 000 Times A Day Patty Loveless & The Cradle Will Rock Van Halen 1 2 I Love You Clay Walker & The Crowd Goes Wild Mark Wills 1 2 Step Ciara Ft Missy Elliott & The Grass Wont Pay
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Legion Rides 11
    CONTENTS I. THE "TRIGGER MAN" ACTS 3 II. THE HOOD Is LIFTED 5 III. THE BLACK LEGION RIDES 11 IV. THE LEGION'S POLITICAL FRONT 23 V. THE ROOTS OF THE BLACK LEGION 29 VI. THE BLACK LEGIONAND LAW AND ORDER 32 VII. A NATIONAL MENACE 35 VIII. FALSE AMERICANISM-ITS NEW HOOD 38 IX. STAMP OUT THE BLACK LEGION 42 P UBLISHED BY W ORKERS LIBRARY P UBLISHER S, INC . , P. O .BOX 148, STA. D, N EW YORK CITY. A UGUST, 1936. ....201' The Black Legion Rides By GEORGE MORRIS I. THE "TRIGGER MAN" ACTS THE meeting at Findlater Temple broke up. The men quickly formed into squads and rushed into cars for the "night ride". Two of the cars, in advance of the others, reached a dark, lonely spot on Dix Road on the outskirts of Detroit. The other cars were apparently delayed by the opening of the River Rouge bridge. Seven occupants of the cars jumped out and went into a huddle. They spoke in low tones and repeatedly turned to look back on the road to see if other cars were coming. Their special concern was a car with black robes, hoods and rope required for a "necktie party". For that is what it was to be. "Well, I guess they must have got lost", said "Colonel" Harvey Davis, a tall, lanky, rat-faced creature. Then, turning to a short, stocky member of the party, he commanded: "Dean, get Poole out." Dean instantly drew two revolvers and stepped toward one of the cars. "Poole, come out of that car!" he said.
    [Show full text]