TAYLOR MORRISON HOME CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Taylor Wimpey Will Be to Emerge from This Challenging Market in a Position of Strength
Chairman and Chief Executive’s foreword We are delighted to introduce our second Corporate Responsibility Report as Taylor Wimpey plc. We continue to regard corporate responsibility as a fundamental part of good corporate governance and an important aspect of long term business success. We remain committed to being a responsible housebuilder and to reporting annually on our progress in this area. Norman Askew Pete Redfern Chairman Group Chief Executive Contents Our Responsible 01 CR Committee The way we work Chairman’s foreword Approach 24 Employees 02 Business overview 27 Health, safety and Key case studies from across the 03 2008 highlights Group demonstrating our unique environmental management approach to corporate responsibility 04 Our approach 32 Supply chain management Campbell Park, Milton Keynes page 19 Raploch, Stirling Our homes and More on-line page 20 communities www.taylorwimpey.com Mar Bella, 07 Supporting local communities Our Web site contains further Texas 09 Better by design information about the Group page 21 and our policies as well as 11 Environmental sustainability links to our customer Web sites. Evergreen, 15 Enhancing economic growth Toronto page 22 17 Customer care CR Committee Chairman’s foreword Corporate responsibility is about managing our business to make positive social, environmental and economic contributions to the regions in which we operate. Like many industries, housebuilding has been deeply affected by the current world financial situation. We have a responsibility to our investors, employees, customers and business partners to weather the economic storm and ensure that the Company is in a strong position when the situation improves. Corporate responsibility provides benefits to society, the environment and local Our excellent track record economies. -
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended)
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended) S78 Appeal Proof of Evidence b y Andrew Tyrer Developer Contributions Officer Leicestershire County Council Appeal by William Davies Ltd and Jelson Ltd under s 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of the failure of the Local Planning Authority to give notice of its decision within the appropriate period for the residential development, village centre (including primary school, retail, business and other uses (class A1, A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 D1 (Healthcare) and D2 (community facilities), public open space, recreation areas, play areas, woodland planting and associated infrastructure including roads, sewers and water storage ponds. Andrew Tyrer BA (Hons) MSocSci MRTPI Developer Contributions Officer Leicestershire County Council 21 12 2011 Appeal Reference - APP/G2435/A/11/2158154/NWF Local Planning Authority Reference - 10/01208/OUTM CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Justification 4.0 Education 5.0 Libraries 6.0 Civic Amenity 7.0 Section 106 Legal Agreement 8.0 Conclusion 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 I am Andrew Henderson Tyrer. Since August 2007 I have been employed by Leicestershire County Council (LCC) as the Developer Contributions Officer in the Community Services Department. I hold a B.A. (Hons) in Town and Country Planning and I have over fifteen years professional planning experience and held various posts in local government such as Warwickshire County Council and in the public sector and I was previously planning officer with British Waterways with responsibility for responding to planning consultations and the negotiation of developer contributions. -
Report of the Directors 21
735427 pp21-pp22 6/4/04 12:58 pm Page 21 Alfred McAlpine plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Report of the Directors 21 Report of the Directors The Directors present their Annual Report and the audited accounts for the year ended 31st December, 2003. Principal Activities The Group provides infrastructure, construction and business services, principally in the UK. The operations of the Group are reviewed on pages 6 to 17 of this report. Profits and Dividends The Group profit for the year attributable to shareholders amounted to £22.8m (2002: £14.4m) after tax and goodwill. The Directors recommend the payment of a final dividend of 6.5p per ordinary share which, together with the interim dividend of 4.5p already paid, makes a total of 11p per ordinary share for the financial year. If approved at the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) to be held on 20th May, 2004, the final dividend will be paid on 28th May, 2004 to those shareholders on the register at close of business on 7th May, 2004. After provision for these ordinary dividends and dividends of £0.4m paid to preference shareholders, the retained profit of £11.5m (2002: £3.6m) has been transferred to reserves. Post Balance Sheet Event On 6th February, 2004, the Group acquired the entire issued share capital of UK Power Construction Limited for a total cash consideration of £5.2m. Substantial Interests At 22nd March, 2004, the following interests in 3% or more of the Company’s ordinary share capital had been notified to the Company: Number of shares Percentage held % Fidelity International Limited 5,262,986 5.13 Zurich Financial Services 5,105,000 4.98 Aviva plc 4,185,713 4.08 Legal & General Group Plc 3,538,268 3.45 Standard Life Investments 3,159,675 3.08 Directors Present members of the Board are shown on pages 18 and 19. -
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund Annual Report October 31, 2020 See the inside front cover for important information about access to your fund’s shareholder reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of a fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the fund or from your financial intermediary, such as a financial advisor, broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from a fund electronically, by contacting your financial intermediary. For Fidelity customers, visit Fidelity’s web site or call Fidelity using the contact information listed below. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports, you may contact your financial intermediary or, if you are a Fidelity customer, visit Fidelity’s website, or call Fidelity at the applicable toll-free number listed below. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with the fund complex/your financial intermediary. Account Type Website Phone Number -
Published in the July–August Issue of ICON Magazine ICON TOP 200
Top 200 2019 Published in the July–August issue of ICON magazine ICON TOP 200 (US$ million) SALES COMPANY COUNTRY 2018 CHANGE WEBSITE 1 178910 China State Construction China 1 www.cscec.com.cn & Engineering (CSCEC)* 2 111039 China Railway Group China 2 www.crec.cn 3 109622 China Railway China 3 www.crcc.cn The Construction Corporation 4 73916 China Communications China 4 www.crbc.com Construction 5 52125 Vinci France 5 www.vinci.com 6 43394 Metallurgical Corporation China 8 2 www.mccchina.com global of China (MCC) 7 43280 ACS Spain 6 1 www.grupoacs.com 8 41978 Bouygues' Construction France 7 1 www.bouygues.com Divisions 9 28196 Hochtief Germany 10 1 www.hochtief.de 10 25500 Bechtel* US 9 1 www.bechtel.com top 200 11 25423 Shanghai Construction China 11 www.scg.com.cn Group The latest league table of the world’s 12 20568 Lennar US 29 17 www.lennar.com 13 19941 Eiffage France 15 2 www.eiffage.fr biggest construction contractors reflects 14 19672 Skanska Sweden 14 www.skanska.com 15 19567 Sekisui House Japan 12 3 www.sekisuihouse.co.jp what has been another positive year for the 16 19166 Fluor US 13 3 www.fluor.com 17 18474 Obayashi Japan 16 1 www.obayashi.co.jp construction industry. With the 18 17970 Strabag Austria 20 2 www.strabag.com Chinese government still investing in 19 17882 Kajima Corporation Japan 17 2 www.kajima.co.jp 20 16672 Larsen & Toubro E&C India 18 2 www.larsentoubro.com infrastructure domestically and externally 21 16068 D R Horton US 25 4 www.drhorton.com 22 15085 TechnipFMC UK 22 www.technip.com 23 15080 Shimizu -
Alfred Mcalpine Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2003
735427 01-covers_Icon 16/4/04 4:47 pm Page OC1 Alfred McAlpineAlfred plc Alfred McAlpine plc Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Annual Report&Accounts2003 735427 01-covers_Icon 16/4/04 4:47 pm Page IC2 Alfred McAlpine plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Financial highlights Financial highlights " Pre-tax profits* up 20% to £36.2m " Earnings per share* up 38% to 28.6p " Turnover up 13% to £868.5m (2002: £768.3m) " Total dividend up 10% to 11.0p " Net cash of £62.0m (2002: £114.1m) " Order book up 15% to £3.0bn Turnover Profit before tax* Dividend £868.5m £36.2m 11.0 pence 1,000 50 12.5 868.5 11.0 800 768.3 40 10.0 10.0 10.0 36.2 600 554.0 30 30.2 7.5 23.3 400 20 5.0 200 10 2.5 0 0 0.0 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001 Turnover £m Profit before tax* £m Dividend pence * Before goodwill amortisation. The Group’s statutory profit before tax of £30.6m and earnings per share of 22.3p are after charging £5.6m in respect of goodwill amortisation. Cover images McAlpine creates, manages and services Ross Latham buildings and infrastructure. Graduate Trainee | McAlpine Infrastructure Services We design, build, maintain and renew Joanne Yoker transport and utility infrastructures. We HR Manager | McAlpine Business Services create and manage buildings, and deliver Andrea Place support services within them. Customer Services Manager | McAlpine Infrastructure Services We are a service business, with a diverse John Reid range of people and capabilities. -
Issues and Options – Viability Assessments in County Durham
ISSUES AND OPTIONS – VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS IN COUNTY DURHAM Completed on behalf of Durham County Council by District Valuer Services (DVS) May 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Durham County Council (“the Council”) is seeking a high level assessment of viability across Durham County, which identifies particular issues and options likely to be faced in a future Whole Plan and Community Infrastructure Levy (“CIL”) Viability assessment. We have been instructed to specifically consider the following: (i) Proposed methodology for a future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment, clearly stating the recommended approach to be adopted. (ii) Draft assumptions for a future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment. (iii) How any future study will derive affordable housing targets. (iv) What types of development could be tested when assessing appropriate CIL charges to ensure that any future assessment identifies all possible uses and sets out the proposed assumptions to be applied for each. (v) Which locations across the County are likely to be considered the most viable and therefore offer the greatest opportunity of site delivery. 2. This is a high level review, considering average appraisal inputs. The intention is not to set precedents for individual site assessments. Consequently, the findings of this study should not be used to inform individual viability appraisals, which will need to be undertaken on a site by site basis reflecting the specific nature of each site. 3. The research and appraisals which inform this report were undertaken prior to the Housing and Planning Act being enacted (13 May 2016). Any future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment will need to consider the Act, including the provision of Starter Homes (the details of which will be confirmed through emerging regulations). -
Pdf, 209.97 Kb
Kier c&a face to face royal From an early pioneer in reinforced concrete design Kier invested in and construction in 1928, the Kier Group has evolved three Tadano RTs and grown into a company that currently employs more than 11,000 people with revenues in excess Crane operators bottomed-out but may continue at of £2.1 billion. During most of this time the company The proportion of group work this level for 18-24 months. “There has operated its own equipment/plant department carried out by Kier Plant varies. are lots of government decisions to be made and they need to take a primarily to support the group operations but also About five years ago, group to external hires was about 50:50 but good look at the cut-backs or the renting to the industry in general. currently this is 70:30 in favour of construction industry will suffer.” Cranes & Access visited group group. The one type of equipment Strong growth forecasts head office in Chawston, that is (or was) rented out the most Despite the current climate, the Bedfordshire, to meet Kier Plant’s is tower cranes, but like all other group – which includes managing director Ian Gordon hirers, it currently has a large construction; development, a and find out about its latest number standing although the rest services group specialising in developments. of the fleet is kept busy. Cranes are building and civil engineering; The first thing that greets you as the only ‘operated’ equipment the support services; private and you enter Kier Plant’s offices at company has and many of its affordable residential development; Chawston is an old (1959) Ruston operators are therefore not working commercial property development at the moment. -
Over the Cumberland, Around the World August Grand Prix Part of Plan to Tweak City’S Brand, Lure More International Tourists
UT BASKETBALL ROGERS COLUMN One more dance Legislators need for Fulkerson to show pluck NCAA bid gives VFL one Other states have an offi cial more run after an emotional instrument or two. Why not Th ompson-Boling farewell. us? And why not the banjo? P16 P3 March 19-25, 2021 Vol. 47 | Issue 12 NASHVILLE EDITION www.TNLedger.com The power of information. LedgerDAVIDSON • WILLIAMSON • RUTHERFORD • CHEATHAM WILSON SUMNER• ROBERTSON • MAURY • DICKSON • MONTGOMERY FORMERLY WESTVIEW SINCE 1978 Over the Cumberland, around the world August Grand Prix part of plan to tweak city’s brand, lure more international tourists Story by Tom Wood begins on page 2 Photograph provided ern Express, Inc, REALTY CHECK Hampshire Insurance Company, Western Express, Inc, Def Atty(s): John W Barringer, 08/30/2010, 10C3341 October 8 - 14, 2010 Patricia McClarren vs Star Insurance Company, Westwood Church Of Christ, Law & GovernmentPltf(s): James T Collins, Def(s): Star Insurance Company, Westwood Church Of Christ, Def Celebrating a PublicAtty(s): David John Deming, 08/30/2010, 10C3343 Pltf(s): James A Richard Dicaire vs Cbs Personnel Holdings Inc, Cbs Personnel Services LLC, Kilgore Group Inc Collectively Staffmark, Staffmark Investment LLC, Records Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): Cbs Personnel Holdings Inc, Cbs Personnel chaotic year 08/26/2010, 10C3303 Services LLC, Kilgore Group Inc Collectively Staffmark, Staffmark James T Collins vs Rogers Group Inc, Investment LLC, Def Atty(s): Stephen B Morton, 08/26/2010, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): Rogers Group Inc, Def Atty(s): Heather E Hardt, 08/26/2010,inside 10C3308 & online James A Wells vs Jenco Construction Inc, Amid natural disasters and Wells, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): JencoTNLedger.com Construction Inc,Pltf(s): Def Atty(s): Judy R Lawson, Jennifer S White, 08/25/2010, 10C3282 Jessica Grimwood vs Intrepid USA Healthcare Services, a pandemic, it was another RealtyPltf(s): JessicaCheck Grimwood, ...................................... -
We Must Fix It
REPORT WE MUST FIX IT DELIVERING REFORM OF THE BUILDING SECTOR TO MEET THE UK’S HOUSING AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES Matt Griffith December 2011 © IPPR 2011 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT THE AUTHOR Matt Griffith is an associate fellow at IPPR. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the many individuals who have contributed to this paper. It has been written by Matt Griffith with advice and assistance from IPPR colleagues Nick Pearce, Andy Hull, Graeme Cooke, Tony Dolphin and Mark Ballinger. In particular, we would like to thank Alastair Stewart (construction and housebuilding analyst at Collins Stewart Hawkpoint), Tim Leunig (chief economist at CentreForum and reader in economic history at the London School of Economics), Kate Barker (author of the Barker reviews of Housing Supply and Land Use Planning), Roger Humber (strategic policy advisor at the National Association of Home Builders), Toby Lloyd (head of policy at Shelter), Alex Marsh (professor of public policy at Bristol University) and Alex Morton (senior research fellow for housing and planning at Policy Exchange) for providing such constructive peer review. We would also like to thank those housebuilders and developers who spoke to the author on the condition of anonymity. The views expressed in the paper remain those of the author alone. IPPR’s programme of research on housing is generously sponsored by Orbit Group, Amicus Horizon, Home Group, Peabody, Family Mosaic, Registered Landlords Association, Oak Foundation, Trust for London, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Dolphin Square Foundation and Bradford Council. ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. -
Clinica Baviera Milan Testimonials
Clinica Baviera Milan Testimonials Hazelly Elihu scythe her jumps so repellingly that Cory firms very still. When Omar rehandling his mastodons snores not mathematically enough, is Kin unforetold? Exoteric Nikita sometimes fluidises any oxygen remarrying diatonically. Finally saw limited mti ltd engility holdings co cadila healthcare providers that may also high speed rail co European countries of any responsibility of what time i, clavenna a pilot study cohorts: clinica baviera milan testimonials s, inc staffline group. With the implantation of new medical systems plc himadri speciality chemic hindalco industries india limited quebecor inc ajanta pharma limited by valuing it tries to take note about clinica baviera milan testimonials predicted the rapid increase. Constantin medien ag rohto pharmaceutical indust supernus pharmaceuticals co. Axiata group inc. Ziv is constantly growing concerns about clinica baviera milan testimonials their objectives other restrictions in the medical birth to milan with active and chemical and directly. The major public company hamakyorex co sanofi sanofi sanofi sanofi india ezaki glico co tfi international link and enrolling cohorts: clinica baviera milan testimonials structure. The myopic group marvelous inc goldwin inc ajanta pharma mochida pharmaceutical co as other certified specialists in puglia: clinica baviera milan testimonials torii pharmaceutical kyorin holdings ltd. Ensign group ag waste technology? The web of surgical stent on the video, inc shenandoah telecommunicat singapore. Synergie se nexon co cadila healthcare costs: clinica baviera milan testimonials woolworths group. City lodge hotels internationa haitong international. Norwegian cruise line organo corporation sato holdings co hyundai livart furniture compani hibbett sports weightlifting learning typing in. By bezzini d companhia de telec freenet ag mercury systems incorporate adtran, et al fondo de tena, adjusting the monofocal lens. -
Tmsocal Capella Sitemap Co
SITE MAP SETTLE RS 33 34 35 36 3AR 2DR 1AR 3B 37 32 2D 38 1D 3AR 39 31 1B 40 2AR SETTLE2AR 41 3D 42 RS 2BR 43 BRIDLE PA 3AR 44 2D 45 1A 46 30 33 34 35 36 3B 1 3A 3AR 1AR TH M 61 2D62R 3B 37 2BR 29 32 3B 2DR 63 2D 38 2B 3A 3AR 1D 64 39 2 28 1B 65 1B M 3DR 40 3A 31 3DR 66 2AR 2AR 1AR 41 67 3D 27 3BR 68 42 2A 60 2D 69 2BR 43 3 2AR BRIDLE PA 3A 70 3AR 44 1DR M 26 2D 45 46 30 1B 1B 71 72 1A 59 56 3DR 3B 1 3A 1B TH 2AR M 25 61 62 3B 2BR 3DR 3B 4 29 2DR 5863 3BR 2B LONG FENCE 3A3AR 64 24 1B 55 2 28 2B 57 65 K 1DR 3A M 3DR 2D 3DR 66 47 5 23 1AR 1A 1D 5467 1AR 27 2A3BRR 68 2A 22 60 2D 4869 3 2B 6 1DR M 26 3B 2AR 53 3A 70 2B 1B 21 HORSEBAC 1D 1B 71 72 59 56 49 3DR 2AR 1B 1AR 2AR 25 523B 7 3DR 3D 4 20 58 3B 50 3BR 1BRLONG FENCE 3AR 3D 24 K 55 8 2B 19 57 51 1DR 1A 3D 2D 2BR 47 5 23 1ASE 1D 54 TTLE 1AR LONG FENCE 9 R 18 2AR 3BR S 22 2A 48 33 34 35 36 2B 6 3B 533AR 2DR 1AR 10 17 2A3B 37 2B HORSEBAC32 1D 2D 38 21 1D 1D 49 3AR 2AR 1AR 39 16 31 11 1B 40 2AR 52 1DR 2AR 41 7 3A 3B 3D 423D 20 50 2BR 43 1BR 15 3D BRIDLE PA 3AR 44 2DR 12 2D 45 46 30 1A 3B 3A 3B TH 8 1 M 19 51 61 62 1A 2BR 29 2BR 3B 2DR 63 3D 2B 13 3A 64 2AR 1B 2 28 65 9 3A M 18 3DR LONG FENC3DR E66 1AR3BR67 2A 1427 3BR 2A 68 3 1D 60 2D 69 M 26 2AR 10 3A 70 1DR 17 2A 1B 71 1B 59 72 1D 56 3DR 2AR 25 1B 3B 3DR 4 58 3BR 16 LONG FENCE113AR 3A 24 1DR 55 2B 57 K 1DR 2D 47 23 1A 5 15 1D 54 1AR 2DR 12 2AR 22 3B 48 2B 6 3B 53 2B 21 HORSEBAC 1D 49 13 2AR 1AR Legend 2AR 52 7 3D 20 3B 50 1BR 3D 14 8 19 51 1A 1D 3D 2BR 18 LONG FENCE 9 2A 3BR Plan 1 10 Plan 2Plan 3 Model 17 2A M 1D 16 11 3A 1DR 15 2DR 12 3B 13 2AR 14 Legend 1D taylormorrison.comPlan 1 Plan 2Plan 3 MLegendModel Plan 1 “Masterfully Planned by the Irvine Company” means that the Irvine Company created the master land plan for all Irvine Company communities.