DOCSLIB.ORG

Taylor Wimpey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taylor Wimpey 21NOV201010391056 Taylor Wimpey plc (incorporated in England and Wales under the Companies Acts 1929 and 1985 with registered number 00296805) £250,000,000 10.375% Senior Notes due 2015 Taylor Wimpey plc (the ‘‘Issuer’’ or ‘‘Taylor Wimpey’’) is offering (the ‘‘Offering’’) £250,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 10.375% Senior Notes due 2015 (the ‘‘Notes’’). The net proceeds from the Offering will be placed into escrow pursuant to an escrow agreement (the ‘‘Escrow Agreement’’) until the date on which Taylor Wimpey receives certain funds from its lenders and certain other conditions are satisfied (the ‘‘Escrow Date’’). Interest on the Notes will be payable semi-annually in arrear in equal instalments on 30 June and 31 December of each year, commencing on 30 June 2011. If the conditions to the release of the escrowed property in the Escrow Agreement are not satisfied within 15 Business Days from the Issue Date or the guarantee by Taylor Wimpey UK Limited is not effective as of the Escrow Date or, in certain circumstances relating to payment disruption, within 2 Business Days after the Escrow Date, the Notes will be subject to a special mandatory redemption on the next succeeding Business Day (the ‘‘Special Mandatory Redemption Date’’) at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes plus accrued interest, and additional amounts, if any, to but not including, the redemption date. The Notes may also be redeemed at our option, in whole but not in part, at any time prior to the Special Mandatory Redemption Date if, in our good faith judgement, the conditions to the release of the escrowed property will not be fulfilled by the Special Mandatory Redemption Date. The Notes will mature on 31 December 2015. Prior to 31 December 2013, the Issuer will be entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of the Notes by paying the relevant ‘‘make-whole’’ premium. At any time on or after 31 December 2013, the Issuer may redeem all or part of the Notes by paying a specified premium to you. In addition, prior to 31 December 2013, the Issuer may redeem at its option up to 35% of the Notes with the net proceeds from certain equity offerings. Upon the occurrence of certain events constituting a change of control, or if we sell certain of our assets, we may be required to make an offer to purchase some or all of the Notes. In the event of certain developments affecting taxation, we may redeem all, but not less than all, of the Notes. The Notes will be senior unsecured debt obligations of the Issuer and will rank pari passu in right of payment with all of the Issuer’s existing and future senior indebtedness that is not subordinated to the Notes, including our New Facilities and Fund Facility. The Notes will be guaranteed to the extent of any shortfall on the amounts due to Noteholders (after taking into account all amounts that Noteholders recover or are entitled to recover from the Issuer and any other guarantor) (the ‘‘Standalone Guarantee’’) by Taylor Wimpey UK Limited (the ‘‘Initial Guarantor’’). This offering circular (the ‘‘Offering Circular’’) includes information on the terms of the Notes and the Standalone Guarantee, including redemption and repurchase prices, covenants and transfer restrictions. Applications have been made for the admission of the Notes to listing on the Official List of the UK Listing Authority and to trading on the Professional Securities Market of the London Stock Exchange. The Professional Securities Market of the London Stock Exchange is an unregulated market for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC (the ‘‘Markets in Financial Instruments Directive’’). Listing particulars issued in compliance with the Listing Rules made under section 73A of FSMA are expected to be approved by the FSA in its capacity as competent authority under FSMA. The Notes will be delivered in book-entry form, represented by a global certificate (the ‘‘Global Note’’) and registered in the name of a nominee of a common depositary for Euroclear Bank SA/NV (‘‘Euroclear’’) and Clearstream Banking, societ´ e´ anonyme (‘‘Clearstream, Luxembourg’’) on or about 2 December 2010 against payment in immediately available funds. The Global Note will be exchangeable for certificates representing definitive Notes in registered form in the minimum denomination of £100,000 in the limited circumstance set out in it. See ‘‘Summary of Provisions relating to the Notes while in Global Form’’. The Notes are expected to be assigned on issue a rating of B2 by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and B+ by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organisation. Investing in the Notes involves risks. See the section of this Offering Circular entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’. Issue price: 100%, plus accrued and unpaid interest from the issue date The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘US Securities Act’’) or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction. Subject to certain exceptions, the Notes may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to or for the benefit of US persons. Accordingly, the Notes are being offered and sold only to non-US persons outside the United States in accordance with Regulation S under the US Securities Act. For a further description of certain restrictions on the offering and sale of the Notes and on the distribution of this document, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Notice to Certain European Investors’’ below. Global Co-ordinators and Joint Physical Bookrunners The Royal Bank of Scotland Barclays Capital Joint Bookrunners HSBC Lloyds TSB Corporate Markets The date of this Offering Circular is 26 November 2010 This Offering Circular comprises listing particulars given in compliance with the Listing Rules. The Issuer and the Initial Guarantor accept responsibility for the information contained in this Offering Circular. To the best of the knowledge of each of the Issuer and the Initial Guarantor (each having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this Offering Circular is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. No person is or has been authorised by the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor or the Initial Purchasers (as defined in ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’) to give any information or make any representation not contained in or not consistent with this Offering Circular or any other information supplied in connection with the issue, offering or sale of the Notes and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorised by the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor or any of the Initial Purchasers. You should base your decision to invest in the Notes solely on information contained in this Offering Circular. Neither the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor nor the Initial Purchasers have authorised anyone to provide you with any different information. Neither this Offering Circular nor any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Notes (a) is intended to provide the basis of any credit or other evaluation or (b) should be considered as a recommendation by the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor or any of the Initial Purchasers that any recipient of this Offering Circular or any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Notes should purchase any Notes. Each investor contemplating purchasing any Notes should make its own independent investigation of the financial condition and affairs of, and its own appraisal of the creditworthiness of, the Issuer and/or the Initial Guarantor. None of the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor, the Initial Purchasers or any of their respective representatives is making any representation to any offeree or purchaser of the Notes regarding the legality of an investment in the Notes by such offeree or purchaser under the laws applicable to such offeree or purchaser. Neither this Offering Circular nor any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Notes constitutes an offer or invitation by or on behalf of the Issuer, the Initial Guarantor or any of the Initial Purchasers to any person to subscribe for or to purchase the Notes. Neither the delivery of this Offering Circular nor the offering, sale or delivery of any Notes or the Standalone Guarantee shall in any circumstances imply that the information contained herein concerning the Issuer and/or the Initial Guarantor is correct at any time subsequent to the date hereof or that any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Notes is correct as of any time subsequent to the date indicated in the document containing the same. The Initial Purchasers expressly do not undertake to review the financial condition or affairs of the Issuer or the Initial Guarantor during the life of the Notes or to advise any investor in the Notes of any information coming to their attention. The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the US Securities Act or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction. Subject to certain exceptions, the Notes may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to or for the benefit of US persons. For a further description of certain restrictions on the offering and sale of the Notes and on the distribution of this document, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Notice to Certain European Investors’’. Each prospective purchaser of the Notes must comply with all applicable laws and rules and regulations in force in any jurisdiction in which it purchases, offers or sells the Notes and must obtain any consent, approval or permission required by it for the purchase, offer or sale by it of the Notes under the laws and regulations in force in any jurisdiction to which it is subject or in which it makes such purchases, offers or sales, and neither we nor the Initial Purchasers shall have any responsibility therefor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    Costain Group PLC PLC Costain Group Costain House Nicholsons Walk Being Number One Maidenhead Costain Group PLC Berkshire SL6 1LN Annual Report 2005 Telephone 01628 842444 www.costain.com Annual Report 2005 Costain is an international Financial calendar engineering and construction Half year results – Announced 31 August 2005 Full year results – Announced 15 March 2006 company, seen as an Report & Accounts – Sent to shareholders 28 March 2006 Annual General Meeting – To be held 27 April 2006 Half year results 2005 – To be announced 30 August 2006 automatic choice for projects Analysis of Shareholders Shares requiring innovation, initiative, Accounts (millions) % Institutions, companies, individuals and nominees: Shareholdings 100,000 and over 156 321.92 90.39 teamwork and high levels of Shareholdings 50,000 – 99,999 93 6.37 1.69 Shareholdings 25,000 – 49,999 186 6.01 1.79 Shareholdings 5,000 – 24,999 1,390 13.78 3.87 technical and managerial skills. Shareholdings 1 – 4,999 12,848 8.06 2.26 14,673 356.14 100.00 Secretary and Registered Office Secretary Registrar and Transfer Office Clive L Franks Lloyds TSB Registrars The Causeway Registered Office Worthing Costain Group PLC West Sussex Costain House BN99 6DA Nicholsons Walk Telephone 0870 600 3984 Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 1LN Telephone 01628 842444 www.costain.com [email protected] Company Number 1393773 Shareholder information The Company’s Registrar is Lloyds TSB Registrars, The Causeway, Worthing, West Sussex BN99 6DA. For enquiries regarding your shareholding, please telephone 0870 600 3984. You can also view up-to-date information abourt your holdings by visiting the shareholder web site at www.shareview.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Woodrow Plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our Aim Is to Be the Homebuilder of Choice
    Taylor Woodrow plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our aim is to be the homebuilder of choice. Our primary business is the development of sustainable communities of high-quality homes in selected markets in the UK, North America, Spain and Gibraltar. We seek to add shareholder value through the achievement of profitable growth and effective capital management. Contents 01 Group Financial Highlights 54 Consolidated Cash Flow 02 Chairman’s Statement Statement 05 Chief Executive’s Review 55 Notes to the Consolidated 28 Board of Directors Financial Statements 30 Report of the Directors 79 Independent Auditors’ Report 33 Corporate Governance Statement 80 Accounting Policies 37 Directors’ Remuneration Report 81 Company Balance Sheet 46 Directors’ Responsibilities 82 Notes to the Company Financial Statement Statements 47 Independent Auditors’ Report 87 Particulars of Principal Subsidiary 48 Accounting Policies Undertakings 51 Consolidated Income Statement 88 Five Year Review 52 Consolidated Statement of 90 Shareholder Facilities Recognised Income and Expense 92 Principal Taylor Woodrow Offices 53 Consolidated Balance Sheet Group Financial Highlights • Group revenues £3.68bn (2005: £3.56bn) • Housing profit from operations* £469m (2005: £456m) • Profit before tax £406m (2005: £411m) • Basic earnings per share 50.5 pence (2005: 50.6 pence) • Full year dividend 14.75 pence (2005: 13.4 pence) • Net gearing 18.6 per cent (2005: 23.7 per cent) • Equity shareholders’ funds per share 364.7 pence (2005: 338.4 pence) Profit before tax £m 2006 405.6 2005 411.0 2004 403.9 Full year dividend pence (Represents interim dividends declared and paid and final dividend for the year as declared by the Board) 2006 14.75 2005 13.4 2004 11.1 Equity shareholders’ funds per share pence 2006 364.7 2005 338.4 2004 303.8 * Profit from operations is before joint ventures’ interest and tax (see Note 3, page 56).
    [Show full text]
  • City-REDI Policy Briefing Series
    City-REDI Policy Briefing Series March Image Image 2018 Part B Carillion’s Collapse: Consequences Dr Amir Qamar & Professor Simon Collinson Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, were proud of their commitment to support regional growth and small-scale suppliers. As part of this commitment they directed 60% of project expenditure to local economies. Following the collapse of the firm, this positive multiplier effect became a significant, negative multiplier effect, particularly damaging to small-scale suppliers in the construction industry. The aim of this policy brief is to examine the consequences of Carillion’s demise, many of which are only now surfacing. One of the fundamental lessons that we can learn from Carillion’s collapse is about these ‘contagion’ effects. As we saw in the 2008 financial crisis, the businesses that underpin the economic health of the country are connected and strongly co-dependent. When a large flagship firm falls it brings down others. This does not mean we need more state intervention. But it does mean we need more intelligent state intervention. One of the fundamental lessons that the Government can learn from the Carillion episode is that it has a significant responsibility as a key customer, using public sector funds for public sector projects, to monitor the health of firms and assess the risks prior to issuing PPI and other contracts. 1 Introduction The collapse of Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, has had a significant, negative knock-on effect, particularly on small-scale suppliers in the industry. In total, Carillion was comprised of 326 subsidiaries, of which 199 were in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020)
    Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020) MAP/LOT OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PROP LOCATION I01/ 1/ / / LEAVITT, DONALD M & PAINE, TODD S 828 PARK AV BALTIMORE MD 21201 55 PINE ISLAND I01/ 1/A / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 54 PINE ISLAND I01/ 2/ / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 51 PINE ISLAND I01/ 3/ / / YOUNG, CHARLES FAMILY TRUST 401 STATE ST UNIT M501 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801 49 PINE ISLAND I01/ 4/ / / SALZMAN FAMILY REALTY TRUST 45-B GREEN ST JAMAICA PLAIN MA 02130 46 PINE ISLAND I01/ 5/ / / STONE FAMILY TRUST 36 VILLAGE RD APT 506 MIDDLETON MA 01949 43 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/ / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 41 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/A / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/B / / KERNER, GERALD 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 38 PINE ISLAND I01/ 7/ / / KERNER, LOUISE G 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 36 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 23 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/B / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 26 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/C / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 33 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/ / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 21 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 17 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/B / / FLYNN, MICHAEL P & LOUISE E 16 PINE ISLAND MEREDITH NH
    [Show full text]
  • Crr 412/2002
    HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management Prepared by Risk Solutions for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 412/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management E Baker Risk Solutions 1st floor, Central House 14 Upper Woburn Place London, WC1H 0JN United Kingdom The concept of good practice is central to HSE’s approach to regulation of health and safety management. There must therefore be a common understanding of what good practice is and where it can be found. A survey was conducted to explore how industry actually identifies good practice in health and safety management, decides how to adopt it, and how this is communicated with others. The findings are based primarily on a segmentation of the survey results by organisation size, due to homogeneity of the returns along other axes of analysis. A key finding is that there is no common understanding of the term good practice or how this is distinguished from best practice. Regulatory interpretation of good practice is perceived to be inconsistent. Three models were identified: A) Large organisations, primarily in privatised industries, have effective Trade Associations where good practice is developed and guidance disseminated industry-wide. B) Large and medium-sized organisations in competitive industries have ineffective trade associations. They develop good practices in-house and may only share these with their competitors when forced to do so. C) Small organisations have little contact with their competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement for SPD3
    Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document SPD3: Parking Standards and Design February 2012 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK LOCAL Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 -1- Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Statement of Community Involvement Review ......................................... 3 3 Public Consultation ................................................................................... 3 4 Inspecting the Scoping and Issues and SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers .............................................................................. 4 5 Representations on the Scoping and Issues SPD and the SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers ..................................................... 4 6 Consultation Responses and Main Issues ................................................ 5 7 Main Changes to the SPD ........................................................................ 5 8. Next Steps ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix 1 - Specific Consultees ................................................................. 8 Appendix 2 – General Consultees ................................................................ 9 Appendix 3 – Other Consultation Bodies ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY World Class Civil Engineering
    SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY WORLD CLASS CIVIL ENGINEERING the future nvironment conomical ocial 1 Our Mission: Providing a sustainable business for the delivery of excellent Introduction projects Our Vision: Sustainability and environmental performance are often used interchangeably. To be the market leader in civil engineering To have a truly sustainable business, we must not only achieve (and exceed where possible) key social, environment and quality standards, but also meet Our Values and Behaviours: key financial commitments such as cash flow and profit. We aim to inspire all employees to meet our high standards The business has recognised for some time that our best performing projects and values in the execution of their duties, to act safely, to be not only have an excellent health, safety, environment and quality record but also environmentally and socially responsible through: perform well financially. Innovation In response to the sustainability challenge, in January 2013 Taylor Woodrow Partnerships launched its Sustainability Matrix. The matrix is part of core business strategy and People and Passion performance against each element of the matrix is discussed and reviewed monthly Strength, Diversity at the divisional management meetings. The matrix is comprised of a range of key and Dependability performance indicators (KPIs) split into three areas: • Economic • Social • Environment As referenced in Inside Civils, a competition was launched to create a logo which would help bring the strategy to life and capture the essence of Taylor Woodrow’s commitment to being a sustainable business; resilient and successful in the long term. Ella Secker (Consents Manager at NET) came up with the winning entry ‘SEE the future’ – the logo which is shown on the front cover.
    [Show full text]
  • (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward
    TYPE Title LastName Organisation/CompanyName (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Walsh OBE Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wild Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Dean Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Haslam Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Hall Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Challender Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Critchley Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wells Greenhalgh Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wilkinson Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Bashir-Ismail Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Darvesh Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Harkin Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Gillies Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ibrahim Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Spencer Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ayub Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Iqbal Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Murray Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Morris Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Thomas Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Zaman Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Clare Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Francis Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Mistry Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Allen Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Rushton Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes an Outstanding Finance Director?
    what makes an outstanding finance director? “ Right now as an FD, you can have a major impact – and if you don’t seize the moment they’ll find somebody else who will.” Steve Marshall, Chair, Balfour Beatty Plc In association with Directorbank Group Directorbank Group Comprising two market-leading brands, Hanson Green and Directorbank, the Directorbank Group offers a complete range of board level recruitment solutions to the full spectrum of companies from private equity backed businesses and family firms to FTSE and AIM listed organisations. Finance Director appointments are delivered by search consultants with many years experience in this specialist market. Directorbank is a leading provider of executive, Hanson Green is a specialist board practice Grant Thornton UK LLP is a leading financial and business adviser, operating non-executive and interim directors with a search firm with a market leading position in out of 28 offices. Led by 215 partners and employing nearly 4,000 of the market-leading position in the private equity the appointment of chairman and non-executive profession’s brightest minds, we provide personalised assurance, tax and sector. directors and a respected executive search specialist advisory services to over 40,000 individuals, privately-held practice. businesses and public interest entities. More than 70 leading private equity houses from across Europe retain Directorbank’s Hanson Green’s proven track record of solving Our offer to the market is great depth of expertise, delivered in a distinctive services to gain access to their exceptional clients’ recruitment challenges, combined with and personal way. Through proactive, client-centric relationships, our teams network of top level board directors for their the unrivalled quality of their service, has made deliver solutions to problems, not pre-packaged products and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the London Plan Energy Policies ­ Phase 3
    Monitoring the London Plan Energy Policies ­ Phase 3 Part 1 report FINAL December 2009 Prepared for: By: Greater London Authority Prof Tony Day, Princess Ogumka & City Hall Phil Jones The Queen’s Walk London South Bank University London SE1 2AA 103 Borough Road Tel 020 7983 4592 London SE1 0AA Tel: 020 7815 7656 E-mail: [email protected] Part 1 report FINAL Contents CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................8 2. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Emissions.................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2. Savings..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Analysis of Energy Efficiency contributions............................................................................... 17 2.4. Analysis of contributions from CHP with communal heating .................................................... 19 2.4.1. Contribution by CHP type........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Audit: Assessing the Design Quality of New Homes
    1 SENSE OF PLACE SENSE OF PLACE 2 APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE ■ Main Street ■ Secondary Street ■ Tertiary Street / Lane / Courtyard 3 SAFETY ■ Is there active frontage on public spaces? ■ Is there overlooking frontage on public spaces? ■ Are the public spaces well lit? ■ Is there fenestration on two elevations at corners? 4 LEGIBILITY ■ Are there orientation markers? ■ Is there a series of events/spaces? 5 EXPLOITATION OF SITE’S ASSETS ■ Are existing buildings retained? ■ Is mature planting retained? ■ Does the layout respond to topography? 6 AVOIDANCE OF HIGHWAY DOMINANCE AND PEDESTRIAN REALM ROADS, PARKING ■ Do footpaths relate to building line? ■ Does the carriageway width vary? 7 PROMOTION OF NON-CAR TRAVEL ■ Is there a permeable network of routes? ■ Are the streets designed to calm traffic? ■ Are there dedicated bus/cycle lanes? ■ Is there safe cycle storage, close to homes? 8 CAR PARKING BUILDING FOR LIFE ■ Parking Type ■ Is it well integrated with public space? ■ Is parking visually unobtrusive? ■ Is it well integrated with planting? 9 SERVICING ■ Is the waste storage unobtrusive? ■ Are servicing arrangements well integrated? 10 MOVEMENT INTEGRATION ■ Are there connections to existing footpaths? ■ Are there multiple connections to the surrounding road network? ■ Is there easy access to main routes? ■ Does the development integrate with existing built development? 11 BESPOKE DESIGN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ■ Is bespoke design evident? ■ Is the local vernacular employed? 12 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY ■ Are good quality materials used? ■ Is attention
    [Show full text]