AGENDA Mm NO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AGENDA Mm NO 1 AGENDA mM NO.----.---------.I Application No. S/99/00886/OUT Date registered 20thJuly 1999 APPLICANT EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT LTD, PALACE HOUSE, NEWPORT, NP9 4EA Agent Stangate Investments (Aylesbury) Ltd, Henstaff Court Business Centre, Gloesfaen, Cardiff DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INTO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CREATION OF ANCILLARY OPENSPACE AND ACCESS ROAD LOCATION ‘CARFIN VILLAGE’, CARFNHOLYTOWN LINK ROAD (A732) CARFIN, MOTHERWELL Ward No. 5 Grid Reference 276600658600 File Reference S/PL/B/5/56( 1 I 8)/CLK/JF Site History 1. S/95/00635/OUT - Redevelopment of ‘Carfin Bond’ site to allow for residential development, neighbourhood centre and public open space. Granted 1 1/7/96 2. S/98/00108/REM - Details of Access Arrangements to Site from A723. Granted 9/3/98 3. Mineral and Contamination Remediation Measures. Approved 29/1/98 4. S/98/0 1208/REM - Construction of 1 18 Houses and 3 8 Flats (Ogilvie Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 5. S/98/01560/OUT- Construction of Dwellinghouses (outline) on site of playground to rear of Hillhead Crescent. Application under consideration. 6. S/98/01564/FUL - Construction of New Road Link Between redevelopment Site and Carfin Street (via Bruce Road) - granted 10/5/99 7. S/98/01244/REM - Construction of 104 Houses and 28 Flats (Bellway Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 8. S/99/00598/FUL - Construction of 88 Houses (Barratt Homes), partly in lieu of Ogilvie Homes development. Granted 9. Construction of 90 houses (McLean Homes) - Granted 2/6/99 This supercedes the ‘Bellway’ proposal. Development Plan 1. Northern Area Local Plan - Industry 2. Draft Southern Area Local Plan - Part Industry, Part residential Contrary to Development Plan Yes CONSULTATIONS Objection No Objection West of Scotland Water, NLC Education Conditions ELC Coininunity Education, The Coal Authority No Reply REPRESENTATIONS 3 Neighbours Two letters of objection Newspaper Advertisement No Response COMMENTS Planning perinission Iias already been granted for a residential development on the 16 ha (40 acre) site of the former Carfin Bond. This also allowed for a commercial development, including small supermarket, row of shops etc. Development in is now underway with McLean, Ogilvie and Barratt all currently building. The developer now wishes to alter and extend this development by deleting the proposed commercial elements, and extending the residential development into a vacant part of the Carfin Industrial Estate. I am satisfied that this proposal will make a positive contribution to the redevelopment of this part of Carfin, and recommend that permission should be granted subject to conditions. It should be noted that part of the proposals (namely the extension into the industrial estate) represents a significant departure from the development plan. Should the committee agree to approve the application, it must be referred to the Scottish Ministers for their consideration. RECOMMENDATION Grant, subject to the following conditions:- I. That no development shall be undertaken within Area B before the necessary "Stopping Up Order" (under the terms of Section 207 ofthe TOM^ and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 has been successfully promoted. Reason: To facilitate the development in the interests of road safety. 2. That the development hereby permitted shall be started, either within five years of the date of this permission, or witliiii two years of the date on which the last of the reserved matters are approved, whichever is the later. Reason: To accord with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. ? 3. That within three years of the date of this permission, an application for approval of the reserved matters, specified in condition 4 below, shall be made to the Planning Authority. Reason: To accord with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. 4 4. That before development starts, a further planning application shall be submitted to the Planning Authority in respect of the following reserved matters:- (a) the siting, design and external appearance of all buildings and other structures; (b) the means of access to the site; c) the layout of the site, including all roads, footways, and parking areas; (d) the provision of equipped play areas; (e) the provision of public open space; (f) the details of, and timetable for, the hard and soft landscaping of tlie site; (g) details for management and maintenance of tlie areas identified in (d),(e) and (f) above; (11) tlie design and location of all boundary walls and fences; (i) the phasing of tlie development; U) details of existing trees, shrubs and hedgerows to be retained; (k) details of existing and proposed site levels. Reason: To enable the Planning Authority to consider these aspects in detail. 5. That, notwithstanding the provisions of the Building Standards (Scotland) Regulations 1990, and before the development starts, a certificate from a recognised firm of chartered engineers, duly signed by a Chartered Engineer or Chartered Geologist of Geotechnical Adviser Status (ICE, SISG 1993) shall be submitted to the Planning Authority confirining the inineral stability of tlie site. This certificate shall be based on a professionally supervised and regulated rotary drilling programme. Reason: To ensure the mineral stability of tlie proposed site in the interests of prospective occupiers (Note: A copy of the required Certificate is available from the Divisional Office). 6. That before the development hereby permitted starts, a report describing the soil and ground conditions prevailing over the application site (including details of the nature, concentration and distribution of any contaminants), sliall be submitted to the Planning Authority and the works required in order to remove or render harmless these contaminants, having regard to the proposed use of the site, shall be agreed in writing with tlie Planning Authority, and development shall not be commenced until these works have been completed. Reason: To ensure the provision of appropriate ground conditions in tlie interests of the health and safety of future residents of the site. 7 That tlie vehicular access point to Bruce Road (as described iia planning perinission Si98101 564/FUL) shall be implemented in full before the occupation of the 350th house within the areas outlined in red and blue on the approved plans. Reason: To ensure satisfactory vehicular access to the site in tlie interests of highway safety and the amenity of future residents. 8. That provision shall be made for footpath links between the site and the A723 (at the northeast corner of area 'A') and to Carfin Street, (at the north west corner of area 'B') all as shown indicatively on approved plans. Reason: To ensure satisfactory pedestrian access between the site and surrounding areas, in the interests of the amenity of future residents. 5 9. That notwithstanding the terms of condition (8) above, the footpath link to Carfin Street shall accord in general terms with the layout shown in Plan No LOO05 (6139) prepared by WSP, and this layout, shall as far as reasonably possible, comply with the undernoted requirements: (a) Euchan Road should meet Carfin Street at right angles and the first 15 metres should not be curved. (b) The Buchan Road/Carfin Street left radius should be 9 metres and the radius to the right remaining at 6 metres. (c) The Carfin Street Industrial Road left radius onto Buchan Road should be 9 metres (d) To achieve a greater forward sightline at the Buchan Road/Park Road curve and junction visibility from the Carfin Street Industrial Road the proposed re-al igned Buchan Road should curve onto its original alignment over as niuch of its length as possible. Buchan Road should be 7.3 metres wide. (e) A 15 metres radius curve should be provided fi-om Park Road onto Buchan Road. This curve should also be widened to 8.65 metres to allow large vehicles to pass each other. (0 A forward sightline of 20 metres should be provided from Park Road onto Buchaii Road. (g) A visibility splay of 4.5 x 30 metres should be provided from the Carfin Street Industrial Road onto Buchan Road. Reason: To ensure a safe footpath link, and to ensure suitable alterations to the road layout within the industrial estate, in the interests of highway safety. 10. That the part removal of Buchan Road shall allow for the following alterations to remaining roads:- (a) continuous footway should be provided along the southwest side of Park Road, including the closure of existing accesses. (b) the new road layout at the junctions of Wallace RoadiBucliaii Road/Park Road slimild be altered to allow for as large corner radii as possible. Reason: To ensure suitable alterations to the road layout within the industrial estate. in the interests of highway safety and convenience. 11. That the followi~~gnoise mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the design and layout of the proposed development: (a) Acoustic fencing, no less than 2.0 metres in height, shall be sited along the boundaries A-B-C and D-E as marked on approved plans and (b) Boundary marked A-B-C on approved plans shall comprise a densely planted raised mounded area to be no less than 10.0 metres in depth 6 Reason: To safeguard future residents from potential problems of noise, dust and disturbance from adjoining industrial units. 12. That the housing layout shall take cognisance of the following general rules: (a) Houses adjoining any inner roundabout shall be orientated towards it, in a similar fashion to that found on the 3 other junctions of the roundabout. (b) Where possible, houses adjoining the A723 and inner spine road leading from the A723 shall, be orientated towards or be side-on to the said roads, and in particular, no more than 50% of a11 such houses shall back on to the roads, (c) Any houses which back on to the A723, the inner spine road, and new road link with Bruce Road shall incorporate elevatioiial treatment (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Consultation Statement for SPD3
    Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document SPD3: Parking Standards and Design February 2012 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK LOCAL Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 -1- Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Statement of Community Involvement Review ......................................... 3 3 Public Consultation ................................................................................... 3 4 Inspecting the Scoping and Issues and SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers .............................................................................. 4 5 Representations on the Scoping and Issues SPD and the SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers ..................................................... 4 6 Consultation Responses and Main Issues ................................................ 5 7 Main Changes to the SPD ........................................................................ 5 8. Next Steps ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix 1 - Specific Consultees ................................................................. 8 Appendix 2 – General Consultees ................................................................ 9 Appendix 3 – Other Consultation Bodies ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultee List
    Consultee List • A43 Action Group • BBD • Abbey Developments Ltd • BDP • Acorn Homes • Beanfield Junior School • Adams Holmes Associates • Beanfield Tenants & Residents Association • Afro Caribbean Association • Bedford Borough Council • Age Concern Northampton & County • Bedford Group Of Drainage Boards • Age Concern Wellingborough • Bedford PCT • Aldwincle Parish Council • Bedfordshire County Council • Alfred Street Junior School • Bee Bee Developments Ltd • Alfred Underwood Limited • Bell Cornwell Partnership • Al-Jamaat Ul-Muslimin Of Bangladesh • Bellway Homes • All Saints CE Primary School • Bellway Homes Ltd • All Saints Church Mears Ashby • Benefield Parish Council • All Saints Gt Harrowden & St Marys Lt Harrowden and • Berkeley Community Villages St Mary’s Orlingbury • Berry Morris • Amec E&E (UK) Ltd • Berry's • Ancer SPA • Bidwells • Andrew Granger & Co LLP • Bidwells Property Consultants • Anglian Water Services Limited • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • Apethorpe Parish Meeting • Billing Parish Council • Appletree Homes Ltd • Bishop Stopford School • Aragon Land And Planning Uk Ltd • Blackthorn Residents Association • Arc Recycled Materials • Blatherwycke Parish Meeting • Archaelogical And Historical Society • Blenheim Property Associates • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Blenheim Realty • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Bletsoes • Arriva UK Ltd • Bloomfields Ltd • Arthingworth Parish Council • Bloor Homes • Arts Council England East Midlands • Boothville Community Council • Ashley Parish Council • Borough
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Request 7862
    FOI Ref Response sent 7862 13 Oct 20 (CCC) Taylor Wimpey - Council Tax & NNDR Credit/Refund Request A) Can you please confirm if your Authority in both the council tax and business rates department holds accounts for Taylor Wimpey or its Subsidiaries listed below (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes. B) Please advise if you have any accounts that currently have credits, write-on’s, or rate overpayments held on account for Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes in relation to all domestic Council tax and Non-Domestic Business Rates rating matters (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). If yes; B1) Please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates start and end, the amount of credit due. (Ideally provide data by excel) C) Please can you confirm if any accounts are overdue or with enforcement agents (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax) If yes; C1) If Yes please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates both start and end date if applicable, amount charged, and any fees. Response: Thank you for your request for information above, which we have dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report April 2010 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact: Planning Policy Team Communities, Regeneration & Environment Directorate Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council FREEPOST Stockport SK1 3YQ Telephone: 0161 474 4395 Fax: 0161 474 4586 Core Strategy DPD: Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report Annex 1 Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Stockport Core Strategy DPD Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Date: September 2009 (Reviewed January 2010) Author: Angie Jukes, BSc, MSc. Health & Environment Advisor (Planning) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Reviewed by: Dr Stephen Watkins, Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport Health Impact Assessment Team at NHS Stockport Planning Policy Team at Stockport MBC Stockport Local Strategic Partnership Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Stockport’s Local Development Framework 2.2 Why do Health Impact Assessment? 2.3 Sustainability Appraisal 2.4 HIA Methodology 2.5 A Health Portrait of Stockport 3.0 HIA Rapid Assessment Findings 3.1 Environmental Conditions 3.2 Socio Economic & Cultural Conditions 3.3 Social & Community Networks 3.4 Lifestyle 4.0 Conclusions & Recommendations to Policy Makers 4.1 Significant Issues 4.2 Health Prevention 4.3 Two birds with one stone 4.4 Recommendations 5.0 Consultation Process & Next Steps Appendix 1 NHS Stockport Pro Forma Drafted Application to Core Strategy Emerging Objectives & Policies 1.0 Executive Summary The Local Development Framework (LDF) incorporates the Core Strategy which is the most important document in the LDF because it sets an overall strategy and vision, establishing the broad aims and objectives for the use of land in Stockport.
    [Show full text]
  • Psd10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance
    PSD10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance February 2017 Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance | February 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number Job number Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Admiral House Rose Wharf 78 East Street Leeds LS9 8EE United Kingdom www.arup.com Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Compliance Report 1 1.2 Structure of this report 2 1.3 Introduction to the IAMP 2 1.4 Development Plan 3 1.5 Planning for the IAMP 4 1.6 Why an Area Action Plan 7 2 Legal and Procedural Compliance 9 2.1 National and European Legal and Procedural Requirements 9 2.1.1 Localism Act 2011 9 2.1.2 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 9 2.2 Legal Requirements for Consultation and engagement 9 2.2.1 Statements of Community Involvement 10 2.2.2 Local Development Scheme 12 2.3 Legal Requirements of the Duty to Cooperate 12 2.4 Legal Requirements for the Sustainability Appraisal 13 2.4.1 Evidence of Compliance 15 2.5 Legal Requirement for the Habitats Regulation Assessment 18 2.5.1 Evidence of Compliance 18 3 Consultation Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Building on Strong Foundations 2001 December 1 WP066 AR 2001 COVER V3 Tp 6/3/02 2:33 Pm Page FC2
    1 WP066 AR_2001 COVER_v3 tp 6/3/02 2:37 pm Page FC1 january february march Annual Report & Accounts 2001 april may june july august september october november Annual Report & Accounts 2001 building on strong foundations 2001 december 1 WP066 AR_2001 COVER_v3 tp 6/3/02 2:33 pm Page FC2 Our commitment to create and deliver value for our customers and shareholders has determined the ways in which we have brought changes to George Wimpey. By continuing to create real value we will achieve our goal of becoming a truly successful housebuilder measured by customers and shareholders alike. Contents Financial Highlights 02 Chairman’s Statement 03 Chief Executive’s Review 04 2001 – The Year That Changed George Wimpey 06 Operating and Financial Review 14 Environmental, Health and Safety Report 20 Board of Directors 21 Corporate Governance 22 Remuneration Report 24 Directors’ Report 27 Group Profit and Loss Account 30 Balance Sheet 31 Group Cash Flow Statement 32 Accounting Policies 33 Notes on the Accounts 34 Auditors’ Report 48 Five Year Review 49 Notice of Meeting 50 George Wimpey PLC Business Directory UK and US 53 Shareholder Information IBC George Wimpey Annual Report & Accounts 2001 During 2001 we have changed to create a new and rejuvenated business. We are rebuilding our Company to ensure that George Wimpey offers a long term secure and rewarding investment for our shareholders. George Wimpey Annual Report & Accounts 2001 02 Financial Highlights Year ended 31 December 2001 2000 Turnover £1895.9m £1702.0m Operating profit* £213.1m £170.2m
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Letters to the Department for Transport Seeking and Granting Permission to Carry out a Targeted Consultation
    SECTION 153 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008, PARAGRAPH 2 OF REGULATION 6 OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (CHANGES TO, AND REVOCATION OF, DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDERS) REGULATIONS 2011 (AS AMENDED) APPLICATION TO MAKE A NON-MATERIAL CHANGE TO THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER: The A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 (SI 2016 No 547) (as corrected by the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent (Correction) Order 2017 (SI 2017/1121)) 5. Letters to the Department for Transport seeking and granting permission to carry out a targeted consultation January 2019 Our ref:TR010018 Woodlands Manton Lane Bedford MK41 7LW Natasha Kopala Head of TWA Orders Unit Department for Transport 26 November 2018 Zone 1/14 – 18 Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Dear Ms Kopala, Proposed non-material change to the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations: Regulation 7(3) – request for exemption from consulting with certain stakeholders on the above application In January 2015 the then Highways Agency submitted a DCO application for the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme. The A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 (the Order) was subsequently made by the Secretary of State for Transport on 11 May 2016. The original DCO submission, documentation and decision can be found on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. Following the Roads Minister’s instruction to Highways England, in 2018, requesting that the new A14 be classified as a motorway, Highways England intends to seek consent from the Secretary of State to make a non-material change to the Order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing Forum
    What consumers thought about… The Housing Forum Base: All respondents (9,913 in 2003, 10,015 in Key 2001 and 10,283 in 2000) Source: MORI Very Fairly Neither/nor Fairly Very No opinion satisfied satisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied National Customer Satisfaction Survey 2003 Designed by Lillington Green 0118 927Designed by Lillington 2474 Green 0118 …the quality of the home …the service from their housebuilder New Home Owners Survey The 2003 National Customer Satisfaction Survey is the third survey conducted among owners of newly built homes; Overall satisfaction with quality Overall satisfaction with service Q15 Taking everything into account, overall, how satisfied or Q2 Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with previous surveys were conducted in 2001 and 2000. Commissioned independently by the Housing Forum – Constructing dissatisfied are you with the quality of your home? the service provided by your housebuilder, taking into Excellence and sponsored by the DTI and ODPM, the survey is designed to provide an analysis of the trends of customer 83 12 account the service both before and after you moved in? satisfaction within the private house building industry over the last three years and form a guide to advise consumers of the 2003 40 43 6 7 5 * +71 65 26 above average performers in the industry this year. In conjunction with the survey results the Housing Forum has produced 87 8 2003 24 41 10 14 12 * +39 2001 43 44 5 5 3 * +79 70 21 a consumer guidance leaflet, What you need to check when buying a newly built property – 10 top tips on key 87 8 2001 27 43 9 12 9 * +49 2000 45 42 4 5 3 * +79 69 23 issues to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Wimpey Annual Report and Accounts 2020
    Taylor Wimpey plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Emerging StrongerAnnual Report and Accounts 2020 www.taylorwimpey.co.uk Contents Taylor Wimpey plc is a customer-focused residential Strategic report developer building and delivering homes and 2 Chairman’s statement communities across the UK and in Spain. 4 Chief Executive’s statement 6 Our market environment 10 Our response in 2020 12 Our equity raise 14 Our management 16 Our robust investment case 18 Our purpose 20 Our business model Our purpose 22 Our strategy and key performance indicators 26 Materiality assessment 28 Our stakeholders 42 Environmental strategy Our response is to build great 44 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Our equity raise in 2020 46 Our approach to identifying and managing risk See pages 12 and 13 See pages 10 and 11 49 Principal Risks and uncertainties homes and 54 Group financial review Directors’ report: governance 60 Chairman’s Statement 62 Governance at a glance create thriving 80 Nomination and Governance Committee report 90 Audit Committee report 98 Remuneration Committee report communities. 121 Statutory, regulatory and other information Financial statements 124 Independent auditor’s report Emerging 130 Consolidated income statement stronger for our 131 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income Our purpose stakeholders This is what our teams come to work to do each 132 Consolidated balance sheet See pages 18 and 19 See pages 28 to 41 133 Consolidated statement of changes in equity and every day and is where the core drivers of 134 Consolidated cash flow statement value for all our stakeholders ultimately lie. 135 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 165 Company balance sheet 2020 has not been a normal year.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Welcome Our vision is to be Creating value the UK’s leading residential by delivering developer for quality creating value and Annual Report and Accounts 2015 delivering quality What’s inside 2 Strategic Report 42 Governance 92 Financial Statements 147 Shareholder Information Delivering quality for all our stakeholders Sustainability Report 2015 Visit us online at www.taylorwimpey.co.uk In This Report 2015 Overview Strategic Report Our integrated approach Operational highlights 4 Where We Operate As part of our continued commitment to good • Completed a total of 13,219 homes, 6 Our Investment Case reporting, this year we have evolved the way we 8 Our Market Review report by integrating aspects of our sustainability, excluding joint ventures, across the UK, 10 Chairman’s Statement operating review and Key Performance Indicators up 7.5% (2014: 12,294 homes) 12 Chief Executive’s Review into our Business Model. Our aim is to balance 16 Our Strategy the long term economic stability and growth of our • 8.0% increase in total average selling 18 Our Business Model Company with our responsibilities to the environment, society and the local economies in which we operate. price to £230k (2014: £213k) 34 Our Approach to Risk Management See our Chief Executive’s • Short term landbank of c.76k plots 36 Principal Risks and Uncertainties Review on page 12 Where can I find key information? 38 Group Financial Review with 60% sourced from the strategic Investors Our Investment Case pages 6 to 7 land pipeline Chief Executive’s Review pages 12 to 17 Our Business
    [Show full text]
  • Shepherds Bush Green Management Plan 2013-23
    [2013-23] andrewk Shepherd Bush Green Managementquadron Plan [Pick the date] Revision Date Author(s) Approved for LBHF by: V1 15/02/13 Andrew Kauffman / Preeti Paul Bassi Chatwal (QSL) 2 1. Contents 1. CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 7 3. STRATEGIC CONTEXT................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM COMMUNITY STRATEGY .................................................................. 8 3.2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACES STRATEGY .......................................................................................... 9 3.3 HOW SHEPHERDS BUSH GREEN CONTRIBUTES TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ........................................... 9 4. KEY SITE INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 11 4.1 SITE DETAILS ...................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 LOCATION ......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 SOILS ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]