DOCSLIB.ORG

Shepherds Bush Green Management Plan 2013-23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shepherds Bush Green Management Plan 2013-23 [2013-23] andrewk Shepherd Bush Green Managementquadron Plan [Pick the date] Revision Date Author(s) Approved for LBHF by: V1 15/02/13 Andrew Kauffman / Preeti Paul Bassi Chatwal (QSL) 2 1. Contents 1. CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 7 3. STRATEGIC CONTEXT................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM COMMUNITY STRATEGY .................................................................. 8 3.2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACES STRATEGY .......................................................................................... 9 3.3 HOW SHEPHERDS BUSH GREEN CONTRIBUTES TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ........................................... 9 4. KEY SITE INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 11 4.1 SITE DETAILS ...................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 LOCATION ......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 SOILS ............................................................................................................................... 12 4.4 HYDROLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.5 FLORA, FAUNA AND NATURE CONSERVATION ............................................................................. 12 4.6 FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.7 HISTORY OF SHEPHERDS BUSH GREEN ...................................................................................... 13 4.8 PRESENT USER PROFILE ........................................................................................................ 16 4.9 MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................... 16 4.10 LEASES, COVENANTS AND LEGAL INTEREST ................................................................................ 17 5. VISION .................................................................................................................................... 18 6. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ................................................................... 20 6.1 CREATING A WELCOMING SQUARE .......................................................................................... 21 6.1.1 BACKGROUND AND ISSUES .................................................................................................... 21 6.1.2 SITE FACILITIES AND FURNITURE.............................................................................................. 23 6.1.3 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 23 6.1.4 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ....................................................................................................... 24 6.2 A HEALTHY, SAFE AND SECURE PARKS AND OPEN SPACES ...................................................... 25 6.2.1 BACKGROUND AND ISSUES .................................................................................................... 25 6.2.2 INSPECTION REGIME ............................................................................................................ 26 6.2.3 SIGNAGE ........................................................................................................................... 26 6.2.4 DOGS ............................................................................................................................... 26 6.2.5 ENCOURAGING HEALTHY LIFESTYLES ........................................................................................ 27 6.2.6 TREE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................ 28 6.2.7 PARKS CONSTABULARY ......................................................................................................... 28 6.2.8 HOW OUR CONTRACTORS MANAGE SAFETY ................................................................................ 30 6.2.9 SAFETY INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 31 6.2.10 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 31 6.2.11 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ....................................................................................................... 31 6.3 A WELL MAINTAINED AND CLEAN OPEN SPACE ...................................................................... 33 6.3.1 BACKGROUND AND ISSUES .................................................................................................... 33 6.3.2 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ............................................................................ 33 6.3.3 CONFIRM INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .................................................................... 34 6.3.4 LITTER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................... 34 6.3.5 GRAFFITI ........................................................................................................................... 35 6.3.6 FLYPOSTING ....................................................................................................................... 35 6.3.7 BUILDINGS AND ASSETS ........................................................................................................ 36 6.3.8 SMALL WORKS TEAM ........................................................................................................... 36 6.3.9 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 36 3 6.3.10 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ....................................................................................................... 36 6.4 ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE SPACES ........................................................................................... 38 6.4.1 BACKGROUND AND ISSUES .................................................................................................... 38 6.4.2 PESTICIDE AND PEAT USE. ..................................................................................................... 39 6.4.3 PESTS AND DISEASE.............................................................................................................. 39 6.4.4 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL .......................................................................................................... 39 6.4.5 WEED CONTROL ................................................................................................................. 39 6.4.6 ARBORICULTURE ................................................................................................................. 40 6.4.7 TREE POLICY AND MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 40 6.4.8 BIODIVERSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES .............................................................................. 41 6.4.9 AIR QUALITY ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................... 41 6.4.10 BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP) ......................................................................................... 41 6.4.11 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (LDF)/UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....................................... 41 6.4.12 GREEN WASTE RECYCLING .................................................................................................... 41 6.4.13 SUSTAINABLE USE OF VEHICLES AND MACHINERY ........................................................................ 42 6.4.14 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................................................ 42 6.4.15 WATER MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................ 42 6.4.16 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 42 6.4.17 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ....................................................................................................... 43 6.5 CONSERVATION AND HERITAGE ............................................................................................. 43 6.5.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 44 6.5.2 HERITAGE OF SHEPHERDS BUSH GREEN .................................................................................... 45 6.5.3 ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION ............................................................................................... 45 6.5.4 MANAGEMENT OF TREES ...................................................................................................... 45 6.5.5 BUILT ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consultation Statement for SPD3
    Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document SPD3: Parking Standards and Design February 2012 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK LOCAL Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 -1- Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Statement of Community Involvement Review ......................................... 3 3 Public Consultation ................................................................................... 3 4 Inspecting the Scoping and Issues and SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers .............................................................................. 4 5 Representations on the Scoping and Issues SPD and the SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers ..................................................... 4 6 Consultation Responses and Main Issues ................................................ 5 7 Main Changes to the SPD ........................................................................ 5 8. Next Steps ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix 1 - Specific Consultees ................................................................. 8 Appendix 2 – General Consultees ................................................................ 9 Appendix 3 – Other Consultation Bodies ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward
    TYPE Title LastName Organisation/CompanyName (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Walsh OBE Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wild Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Dean Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Haslam Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Hall Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Challender Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Critchley Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wells Greenhalgh Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wilkinson Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Bashir-Ismail Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Darvesh Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Harkin Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Gillies Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ibrahim Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Spencer Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ayub Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Iqbal Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Murray Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Morris Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Thomas Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Zaman Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Clare Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Francis Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Mistry Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Allen Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Rushton Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Audit: Assessing the Design Quality of New Homes
    1 SENSE OF PLACE SENSE OF PLACE 2 APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE ■ Main Street ■ Secondary Street ■ Tertiary Street / Lane / Courtyard 3 SAFETY ■ Is there active frontage on public spaces? ■ Is there overlooking frontage on public spaces? ■ Are the public spaces well lit? ■ Is there fenestration on two elevations at corners? 4 LEGIBILITY ■ Are there orientation markers? ■ Is there a series of events/spaces? 5 EXPLOITATION OF SITE’S ASSETS ■ Are existing buildings retained? ■ Is mature planting retained? ■ Does the layout respond to topography? 6 AVOIDANCE OF HIGHWAY DOMINANCE AND PEDESTRIAN REALM ROADS, PARKING ■ Do footpaths relate to building line? ■ Does the carriageway width vary? 7 PROMOTION OF NON-CAR TRAVEL ■ Is there a permeable network of routes? ■ Are the streets designed to calm traffic? ■ Are there dedicated bus/cycle lanes? ■ Is there safe cycle storage, close to homes? 8 CAR PARKING BUILDING FOR LIFE ■ Parking Type ■ Is it well integrated with public space? ■ Is parking visually unobtrusive? ■ Is it well integrated with planting? 9 SERVICING ■ Is the waste storage unobtrusive? ■ Are servicing arrangements well integrated? 10 MOVEMENT INTEGRATION ■ Are there connections to existing footpaths? ■ Are there multiple connections to the surrounding road network? ■ Is there easy access to main routes? ■ Does the development integrate with existing built development? 11 BESPOKE DESIGN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ■ Is bespoke design evident? ■ Is the local vernacular employed? 12 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY ■ Are good quality materials used? ■ Is attention
    [Show full text]
  • Ny Lihtc Properties.Pdf
    1 LIHTCPropertiesinNewYorkThrough2013 Annual Low Rentor TaxͲ HUDMultiͲFamily Zip Nonprofit Allocation Allocated YearPlaced Total Income Income Exempt Financing/Rental ProjectName Address City State Code Sponsor Year Amount inService ConstructionType Units Units Ceiling CreditPercentage Bond Assistance 1CalmanPl 1CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 1E35thSt 1E35thSt NewYork NY 10016 No 2006$ 1,340,766 2007 NewConstruction 91 90 60%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes 1HavenPlz 1HavenPlz NewYork NY 10009 No 2011$ 1,538,719 2012 AcquisitionAndRehab 372 371 30%presentvalue Yes Yes 1PleasantAveW 1PleasantAveW Lancaster NY 14086 1987 AcquisitionAndRehab 155 155 30%presentvalue No 1W137thSt 1W137thSt NewYork NY 10037 No 2012$ 267,841 2013 AcquisitionAndRehab 68 67 60%AMGI Both30%and70% No 10BayHeightsCir 10BayHeightsCir Geneva NY 14456 1989 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10CalmanPl 10CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10WeldonSt 10WeldonSt Rochester NY 14611 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2009$ 222,791 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2013$ 202,106 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue No 101OntarioSt 101OntarioSt Rochester NY 14605 1991 1991 AcquisitionAndRehab 22 30%presentvalue No 101RailroadAve 101RailroadAve Goshen NY 10924 1996 1997 NewConstruction 85 84 70%presentvalue No 101S3rdSt 101S3rdSt Brooklyn NY 11249 Yes 1989$ 233,213 1989 AcquisitionAndRehab
    [Show full text]
  • North Lanarkshire Council
    1 North Lanarkshire Council DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PIa nn i n g Ap pI ica t io ns for consideration of Planning and Development Committee Committee Date : 30th September1998 Ordnance Survey maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey with the permission of HMSO Crown Copyright reserved 2 APPLICATIONS FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 30th SEPTEMBER, 1998 Page No. Application No. Applicant Development/Locus Recommendation 5 N/97/00 140IFUL Railtrack Property Installation of Drainage System, site adjacent to Grant B802 (opposite Croy Station), Cumbernauld. 11 N/98/00430/FUL Railtrack PLC Upgrading and Augmentation of Drainage System, Grant land on Dullatur Golf Course,(site adjacent to Croy Station), Cumbemauld. N/98/00653/MIN Alexander Russell PLC Non-compliance with Conditions 2 and 11 of Grant (REPORT TO FOLLOW) Planning Permission No. MIN 83/718 for Winning and Working of Minerals, former Bedlay Colliery Site, Birkenshaw Road, Gartcosh. 14 N/98/00657/FUL Highwynd Limited Formation of a Pedestrian Gate in Existing Fence Grant on south side of Eastfield Road and Associated Path, Slabs, etc, 7 Gailes Road, Westerwood, Cumbernauld. 20 N/98/00749/FUL Forte UK Ltd Erection of a Single Storey Extension to Grant Accommodate Fast Food Take Away, Little Chef, Castlecary Road, Cumbernauld. 28 N/98/00754/FUL Douglas John Martin Erection of Dwelling, 122 Main Street, Chryston. Grant 35 N/98/01116/0UT Mr C Hone Erection of Residential Development (3 Flats) in Grant outline, 122/124 Main Street, Chryston G 69 9LD 41 N/98/00757/FUL Beazer Homes Change of Use of Open Space to Residential and Grant (P) Erection of 13 Dwellinghouses, Area C3 Westerwood.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Mm NO
    1 AGENDA mM NO.----.---------.I Application No. S/99/00886/OUT Date registered 20thJuly 1999 APPLICANT EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT LTD, PALACE HOUSE, NEWPORT, NP9 4EA Agent Stangate Investments (Aylesbury) Ltd, Henstaff Court Business Centre, Gloesfaen, Cardiff DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INTO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CREATION OF ANCILLARY OPENSPACE AND ACCESS ROAD LOCATION ‘CARFIN VILLAGE’, CARFNHOLYTOWN LINK ROAD (A732) CARFIN, MOTHERWELL Ward No. 5 Grid Reference 276600658600 File Reference S/PL/B/5/56( 1 I 8)/CLK/JF Site History 1. S/95/00635/OUT - Redevelopment of ‘Carfin Bond’ site to allow for residential development, neighbourhood centre and public open space. Granted 1 1/7/96 2. S/98/00108/REM - Details of Access Arrangements to Site from A723. Granted 9/3/98 3. Mineral and Contamination Remediation Measures. Approved 29/1/98 4. S/98/0 1208/REM - Construction of 1 18 Houses and 3 8 Flats (Ogilvie Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 5. S/98/01560/OUT- Construction of Dwellinghouses (outline) on site of playground to rear of Hillhead Crescent. Application under consideration. 6. S/98/01564/FUL - Construction of New Road Link Between redevelopment Site and Carfin Street (via Bruce Road) - granted 10/5/99 7. S/98/01244/REM - Construction of 104 Houses and 28 Flats (Bellway Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 8. S/99/00598/FUL - Construction of 88 Houses (Barratt Homes), partly in lieu of Ogilvie Homes development. Granted 9. Construction of 90 houses (McLean Homes) - Granted 2/6/99 This supercedes the ‘Bellway’ proposal. Development Plan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultee List
    Consultee List • A43 Action Group • BBD • Abbey Developments Ltd • BDP • Acorn Homes • Beanfield Junior School • Adams Holmes Associates • Beanfield Tenants & Residents Association • Afro Caribbean Association • Bedford Borough Council • Age Concern Northampton & County • Bedford Group Of Drainage Boards • Age Concern Wellingborough • Bedford PCT • Aldwincle Parish Council • Bedfordshire County Council • Alfred Street Junior School • Bee Bee Developments Ltd • Alfred Underwood Limited • Bell Cornwell Partnership • Al-Jamaat Ul-Muslimin Of Bangladesh • Bellway Homes • All Saints CE Primary School • Bellway Homes Ltd • All Saints Church Mears Ashby • Benefield Parish Council • All Saints Gt Harrowden & St Marys Lt Harrowden and • Berkeley Community Villages St Mary’s Orlingbury • Berry Morris • Amec E&E (UK) Ltd • Berry's • Ancer SPA • Bidwells • Andrew Granger & Co LLP • Bidwells Property Consultants • Anglian Water Services Limited • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • Apethorpe Parish Meeting • Billing Parish Council • Appletree Homes Ltd • Bishop Stopford School • Aragon Land And Planning Uk Ltd • Blackthorn Residents Association • Arc Recycled Materials • Blatherwycke Parish Meeting • Archaelogical And Historical Society • Blenheim Property Associates • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Blenheim Realty • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Bletsoes • Arriva UK Ltd • Bloomfields Ltd • Arthingworth Parish Council • Bloor Homes • Arts Council England East Midlands • Boothville Community Council • Ashley Parish Council • Borough
    [Show full text]
  • Hereford Area Plan Site Options Consultation Statement Appendix 1
    Question 1: Do you agree that the sites that have been identified as having potential are the most suitable sites to consider for future housing development? If there is a specific site you have concerns about please identify the site in your response. Site ref Name of responder Comments All the sites have the potential to impact on the River Wye SAC through foul and surface water drainage. Some of the sites due to their proximity to either the River Wye or water courses which are a tributary of the River Wye may have impacts on otters which are an interest feature of the SAC and Bel08 & various Natural England SSSI. (Please refer to published original responses for full version). We support the proposed allocation of Bel08 however we consider that all of the land that we submitted for our client should be included in the HAP even if it is identified as a 'HAP Discounted Bel08 Savills Site'. (Please refer to published original responses for full version). Reference to rejection of Newton Farm Town Green Action Group's Argyll Rise town green Bel08 Martin Gilleland application. (Please refer to published online responses for full version). Bel15 ‐ A number of potential constraints are present at the site. However, it is considered that with careful design of the proposed development to enable the retention of the mature and veteran trees (the habitats of greatest ecological value), and the implementation of suitable safeguarding measures, the delivery of the site is readily achievable in terms of ecology. Lioncourt submits that it is wholly inappropriate to identify sites with an approximate collective capacity of less than the identified minimum housing requirement of 3,200 dwellings.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Request 7862
    FOI Ref Response sent 7862 13 Oct 20 (CCC) Taylor Wimpey - Council Tax & NNDR Credit/Refund Request A) Can you please confirm if your Authority in both the council tax and business rates department holds accounts for Taylor Wimpey or its Subsidiaries listed below (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes. B) Please advise if you have any accounts that currently have credits, write-on’s, or rate overpayments held on account for Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes in relation to all domestic Council tax and Non-Domestic Business Rates rating matters (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). If yes; B1) Please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates start and end, the amount of credit due. (Ideally provide data by excel) C) Please can you confirm if any accounts are overdue or with enforcement agents (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax) If yes; C1) If Yes please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates both start and end date if applicable, amount charged, and any fees. Response: Thank you for your request for information above, which we have dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report April 2010 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact: Planning Policy Team Communities, Regeneration & Environment Directorate Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council FREEPOST Stockport SK1 3YQ Telephone: 0161 474 4395 Fax: 0161 474 4586 Core Strategy DPD: Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report Annex 1 Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Stockport Core Strategy DPD Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Date: September 2009 (Reviewed January 2010) Author: Angie Jukes, BSc, MSc. Health & Environment Advisor (Planning) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Reviewed by: Dr Stephen Watkins, Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport Health Impact Assessment Team at NHS Stockport Planning Policy Team at Stockport MBC Stockport Local Strategic Partnership Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Stockport’s Local Development Framework 2.2 Why do Health Impact Assessment? 2.3 Sustainability Appraisal 2.4 HIA Methodology 2.5 A Health Portrait of Stockport 3.0 HIA Rapid Assessment Findings 3.1 Environmental Conditions 3.2 Socio Economic & Cultural Conditions 3.3 Social & Community Networks 3.4 Lifestyle 4.0 Conclusions & Recommendations to Policy Makers 4.1 Significant Issues 4.2 Health Prevention 4.3 Two birds with one stone 4.4 Recommendations 5.0 Consultation Process & Next Steps Appendix 1 NHS Stockport Pro Forma Drafted Application to Core Strategy Emerging Objectives & Policies 1.0 Executive Summary The Local Development Framework (LDF) incorporates the Core Strategy which is the most important document in the LDF because it sets an overall strategy and vision, establishing the broad aims and objectives for the use of land in Stockport.
    [Show full text]
  • Psd10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance
    PSD10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance February 2017 Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance | February 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number Job number Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Admiral House Rose Wharf 78 East Street Leeds LS9 8EE United Kingdom www.arup.com Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Compliance Report 1 1.2 Structure of this report 2 1.3 Introduction to the IAMP 2 1.4 Development Plan 3 1.5 Planning for the IAMP 4 1.6 Why an Area Action Plan 7 2 Legal and Procedural Compliance 9 2.1 National and European Legal and Procedural Requirements 9 2.1.1 Localism Act 2011 9 2.1.2 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 9 2.2 Legal Requirements for Consultation and engagement 9 2.2.1 Statements of Community Involvement 10 2.2.2 Local Development Scheme 12 2.3 Legal Requirements of the Duty to Cooperate 12 2.4 Legal Requirements for the Sustainability Appraisal 13 2.4.1 Evidence of Compliance 15 2.5 Legal Requirement for the Habitats Regulation Assessment 18 2.5.1 Evidence of Compliance 18 3 Consultation Statement
    [Show full text]