DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Taylor Wimpey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Taylor Wimpey 124 Independent auditor’s report to the members of Taylor Wimpey plc Report on the audit of the financial statements Scoping Based on our scoping assessment, our Group audit was focused on the UK Housing division (excluding joint ventures) Opinion which represented the principal segment within the Group In our opinion: and accounted for 98% of the Group’s net operating assets – the financial statements of Taylor Wimpey plc (the ‘Parent Company’) 97% of the Group’s revenue and 97% of the Group’s pre-tax and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) give a true and fair view of the state of profit before exceptional items. the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December Significant In relation to the key audit matters, we have added the 2018 and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended; changes accounting for the cladding provision due to the judgement – the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in in our required in estimating the liability. accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as approach There have been no significant changes in our approach adopted by the European Union and IFRSs as issued by the International to scoping the audit and in determining materiality. Accounting Standards Board (IASB); – the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in Conclusions relating to going concern, principal risks and accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting viability statement Practice including Financial Reporting Standard 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”; and Going concern – the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in Note 1 to the financial requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. going concern basis of accounting in preparing them and their identification We have audited the financial statements which comprise: of any material uncertainties to the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of – the Consolidated Income Statement; approval of the financial statements. – the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; We considered as part of our risk assessment the nature of the Company, – the Consolidated and Parent Company Balance Sheets; its business model and related risks including where relevant the impact of – the Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Changes in Equity; Brexit, the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework and the system of internal control. We evaluated the Directors’ assessment of – the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement; and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, including challenging – Notes 1 to 33 relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the underlying data and key assumptions used to make the assessment, Notes 1 to 15 relating to the Parent Company Financial Statements. and evaluated the Directors’ plans for future actions in relation to their going The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation concern assessment. of the Group Financial Statements is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted We are required to state whether we have anything material to add or draw by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been attention to in relation to that statement required by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) applied in the preparation of the Parent Company Financial Statements and report if the statement is materially inconsistent with our knowledge is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including obtained in the audit. FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). We confirm that we have nothing material to report, add or draw attention to in respect of these matters. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Principal risks and viability statement Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under Based solely on reading the Directors’ statements and considering whether those standards are further described in the auditor’s responsibilities for they were consistent with the knowledge we obtained in the course of the the audit of the financial statements section of our report. audit, including the knowledge obtained in the evaluation of the Directors’ We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance assessment of the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial going concern, we are required to state whether we have anything material statements in the UK, including the Financial Reporting Council’s (the ‘FRC’s’) to add or draw attention to in relation to: Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other – the disclosures on pages 44 to 51 that describe the principal risks and ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We confirm that explain how they are being managed or mitigated; the non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not – the Directors' confirmation on page 44 that they have carried out a provided to the Group or Parent Company. We believe that the audit evidence robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group, including we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. those that would threaten its business model, future performance, Summary of our audit approach solvency or liquidity; or – the Directors’ explanation on page 51 as to how they have assessed the Key audit The key audit matters that we identified in the current prospects of the Group, over what period they have done so and why matters year were: they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to – inventory costing and margin recognition; whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able – defined benefit pension scheme accounting; to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the – accounting for the leasehold provision; and period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing – accounting for the cladding provision. attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions. Within this report, any new key audit matters are identified We are also required to report whether the directors’ statement relating to with and any key audit matters which are the same as the prospects of the Group required by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) is materially the prior year are identified with . inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit. Materiality The materiality that we used for the Group Financial Statements We confirm that we have nothing material to report, add or draw attention Annual Report and Accounts 2018 was £42.0 million which was determined on the basis of 5% to in respect of these matters. of pre-tax profit for the year, excluding exceptional items. Taylor Wimpey plc 124 125 Independent auditor’s report to the members of Taylor Wimpey plc Report on the audit of the financial statements Scoping Based on our scoping assessment, our Group audit was Key audit matters Financial statements focused on the UK Housing division (excluding joint ventures) Opinion Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements in the period and which represented the principal segment within the Group include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which In our opinion: and accounted for 98% of the Group’s net operating assets had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. – the financial statements of Taylor Wimpey plc (the ‘Parent Company’) 97% of the Group’s revenue and 97% of the Group’s pre-tax These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) give a true and fair view of the state of profit before exceptional items. provide a separate opinion on these matters. the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December Significant In relation to the key audit matters, we have added the 2018 and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended; changes accounting for the cladding provision due to the judgement For each key audit matter we perform procedures to assess the design and implementation of key controls in mitigating the risk that the associated balances are misstated. – the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in in our required in estimating the liability. accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as approach There have been no significant changes in our approach Inventory costing and margin recognition adopted by the European Union and IFRSs as issued by the International to scoping the audit and in determining materiality. Refer to page 86 (Audit Committee report), page 139 (source of estimation uncertainty) and page 149 (financial statements disclosures). Accounting Standards Board (IASB); Key audit The value for inventory as at 31 December 2018 is £4,188.2 million (2017: £4,075.7 million) and as such is the most significant asset on the – the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in Conclusions relating to going concern, principal risks and matter balance sheet (page 132). Inventory comprises land and work in progress (‘WIP’); WIP includes the construction cost of developing a site, accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting viability statement description and is transferred to cost of sales as each legal completion takes place.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward
    TYPE Title LastName Organisation/CompanyName (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Walsh OBE Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wild Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Dean Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Haslam Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Hall Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Challender Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Critchley Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wells Greenhalgh Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wilkinson Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Bashir-Ismail Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Darvesh Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Harkin Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Gillies Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ibrahim Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Spencer Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ayub Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Iqbal Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Murray Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Morris Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Thomas Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Zaman Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Clare Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Francis Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Mistry Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Allen Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Rushton Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Audit: Assessing the Design Quality of New Homes
    1 SENSE OF PLACE SENSE OF PLACE 2 APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE ■ Main Street ■ Secondary Street ■ Tertiary Street / Lane / Courtyard 3 SAFETY ■ Is there active frontage on public spaces? ■ Is there overlooking frontage on public spaces? ■ Are the public spaces well lit? ■ Is there fenestration on two elevations at corners? 4 LEGIBILITY ■ Are there orientation markers? ■ Is there a series of events/spaces? 5 EXPLOITATION OF SITE’S ASSETS ■ Are existing buildings retained? ■ Is mature planting retained? ■ Does the layout respond to topography? 6 AVOIDANCE OF HIGHWAY DOMINANCE AND PEDESTRIAN REALM ROADS, PARKING ■ Do footpaths relate to building line? ■ Does the carriageway width vary? 7 PROMOTION OF NON-CAR TRAVEL ■ Is there a permeable network of routes? ■ Are the streets designed to calm traffic? ■ Are there dedicated bus/cycle lanes? ■ Is there safe cycle storage, close to homes? 8 CAR PARKING BUILDING FOR LIFE ■ Parking Type ■ Is it well integrated with public space? ■ Is parking visually unobtrusive? ■ Is it well integrated with planting? 9 SERVICING ■ Is the waste storage unobtrusive? ■ Are servicing arrangements well integrated? 10 MOVEMENT INTEGRATION ■ Are there connections to existing footpaths? ■ Are there multiple connections to the surrounding road network? ■ Is there easy access to main routes? ■ Does the development integrate with existing built development? 11 BESPOKE DESIGN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ■ Is bespoke design evident? ■ Is the local vernacular employed? 12 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY ■ Are good quality materials used? ■ Is attention
    [Show full text]
  • Ny Lihtc Properties.Pdf
    1 LIHTCPropertiesinNewYorkThrough2013 Annual Low Rentor TaxͲ HUDMultiͲFamily Zip Nonprofit Allocation Allocated YearPlaced Total Income Income Exempt Financing/Rental ProjectName Address City State Code Sponsor Year Amount inService ConstructionType Units Units Ceiling CreditPercentage Bond Assistance 1CalmanPl 1CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 1E35thSt 1E35thSt NewYork NY 10016 No 2006$ 1,340,766 2007 NewConstruction 91 90 60%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes 1HavenPlz 1HavenPlz NewYork NY 10009 No 2011$ 1,538,719 2012 AcquisitionAndRehab 372 371 30%presentvalue Yes Yes 1PleasantAveW 1PleasantAveW Lancaster NY 14086 1987 AcquisitionAndRehab 155 155 30%presentvalue No 1W137thSt 1W137thSt NewYork NY 10037 No 2012$ 267,841 2013 AcquisitionAndRehab 68 67 60%AMGI Both30%and70% No 10BayHeightsCir 10BayHeightsCir Geneva NY 14456 1989 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10CalmanPl 10CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10WeldonSt 10WeldonSt Rochester NY 14611 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2009$ 222,791 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2013$ 202,106 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue No 101OntarioSt 101OntarioSt Rochester NY 14605 1991 1991 AcquisitionAndRehab 22 30%presentvalue No 101RailroadAve 101RailroadAve Goshen NY 10924 1996 1997 NewConstruction 85 84 70%presentvalue No 101S3rdSt 101S3rdSt Brooklyn NY 11249 Yes 1989$ 233,213 1989 AcquisitionAndRehab
    [Show full text]
  • North Lanarkshire Council
    1 North Lanarkshire Council DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PIa nn i n g Ap pI ica t io ns for consideration of Planning and Development Committee Committee Date : 30th September1998 Ordnance Survey maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey with the permission of HMSO Crown Copyright reserved 2 APPLICATIONS FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 30th SEPTEMBER, 1998 Page No. Application No. Applicant Development/Locus Recommendation 5 N/97/00 140IFUL Railtrack Property Installation of Drainage System, site adjacent to Grant B802 (opposite Croy Station), Cumbernauld. 11 N/98/00430/FUL Railtrack PLC Upgrading and Augmentation of Drainage System, Grant land on Dullatur Golf Course,(site adjacent to Croy Station), Cumbemauld. N/98/00653/MIN Alexander Russell PLC Non-compliance with Conditions 2 and 11 of Grant (REPORT TO FOLLOW) Planning Permission No. MIN 83/718 for Winning and Working of Minerals, former Bedlay Colliery Site, Birkenshaw Road, Gartcosh. 14 N/98/00657/FUL Highwynd Limited Formation of a Pedestrian Gate in Existing Fence Grant on south side of Eastfield Road and Associated Path, Slabs, etc, 7 Gailes Road, Westerwood, Cumbernauld. 20 N/98/00749/FUL Forte UK Ltd Erection of a Single Storey Extension to Grant Accommodate Fast Food Take Away, Little Chef, Castlecary Road, Cumbernauld. 28 N/98/00754/FUL Douglas John Martin Erection of Dwelling, 122 Main Street, Chryston. Grant 35 N/98/01116/0UT Mr C Hone Erection of Residential Development (3 Flats) in Grant outline, 122/124 Main Street, Chryston G 69 9LD 41 N/98/00757/FUL Beazer Homes Change of Use of Open Space to Residential and Grant (P) Erection of 13 Dwellinghouses, Area C3 Westerwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereford Area Plan Site Options Consultation Statement Appendix 1
    Question 1: Do you agree that the sites that have been identified as having potential are the most suitable sites to consider for future housing development? If there is a specific site you have concerns about please identify the site in your response. Site ref Name of responder Comments All the sites have the potential to impact on the River Wye SAC through foul and surface water drainage. Some of the sites due to their proximity to either the River Wye or water courses which are a tributary of the River Wye may have impacts on otters which are an interest feature of the SAC and Bel08 & various Natural England SSSI. (Please refer to published original responses for full version). We support the proposed allocation of Bel08 however we consider that all of the land that we submitted for our client should be included in the HAP even if it is identified as a 'HAP Discounted Bel08 Savills Site'. (Please refer to published original responses for full version). Reference to rejection of Newton Farm Town Green Action Group's Argyll Rise town green Bel08 Martin Gilleland application. (Please refer to published online responses for full version). Bel15 ‐ A number of potential constraints are present at the site. However, it is considered that with careful design of the proposed development to enable the retention of the mature and veteran trees (the habitats of greatest ecological value), and the implementation of suitable safeguarding measures, the delivery of the site is readily achievable in terms of ecology. Lioncourt submits that it is wholly inappropriate to identify sites with an approximate collective capacity of less than the identified minimum housing requirement of 3,200 dwellings.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Request 7862
    FOI Ref Response sent 7862 13 Oct 20 (CCC) Taylor Wimpey - Council Tax & NNDR Credit/Refund Request A) Can you please confirm if your Authority in both the council tax and business rates department holds accounts for Taylor Wimpey or its Subsidiaries listed below (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes. B) Please advise if you have any accounts that currently have credits, write-on’s, or rate overpayments held on account for Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes in relation to all domestic Council tax and Non-Domestic Business Rates rating matters (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). If yes; B1) Please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates start and end, the amount of credit due. (Ideally provide data by excel) C) Please can you confirm if any accounts are overdue or with enforcement agents (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax) If yes; C1) If Yes please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates both start and end date if applicable, amount charged, and any fees. Response: Thank you for your request for information above, which we have dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a List of Bodies Consulted
    Appendix A List of bodies consulted Appendix A – Detailed List of Consultees 3G Brake Farm Ltd Academy Variety Workshop Bride Hall Developments Action Group for Sutton Harbour British Telecom Group plc Adelaide Street Surgery Brittany Ferries ADG Brixton Parish Council Aggregate Industries UK Ltd Brook Street Properties AHIMSA Bryant Homes Alder King Budshead Health Centre Allsop Matcham Budshead Trust Antony Parish Council Bull Point Community School Aquanauts Ltd Business In The Community Armada Surgery Business Link Devon & Cornwall Arts Council England, South West C/o Morris Baptist Church Arts Unit, Plymouth City Council C/o PGVS Ashfords Solicitors c/o Plymouth 2020 Ashtorre Rock Community Centre c/o Public Health Dispensary Unit Associated British Ports c/o St Peters Lutheran Church Association of Barbican Businesses Cable and Wireless Aster Group/ Sarsen Housing Association Callington Health Centre ATISREAL UK Callington Library Atkins Callington Town Council Audit Commission Calstock Parish Council Austin Farm Community Primary School Campaign to Protect Rural Engalnd AZ Urban Studio Cancer Research UK B&Q plc Cann Estate Bacara/Bites Capital Planning Bailey Partnership Caradon District Council Bakers Associates Care & Repair Barbican Harbourside Residents Association Carlton ITV Westcountry Barne Barton Community School Cathedral School of St Mary Barton Surgery Cattedown Regeneration Barton Willmore Partnership Cattewater Harbour Commissioners BBC South West Central Park Allotment Association BDA Consulting Central Park Youth
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document November 2012
    Draft Planning Obligations Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document November 2012 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT CONSULTATION STATEMENT NOVEMBER 2012 www.darlington.gov.uk/planningpolicy Draft Planning Obligations Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document November 2012 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 this consultation statement sets out: i) the names of those consulted in the preparation of the Draft Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document (SPD); ii) a summary of the main issues raised during the consultations, and; iii) how these issues will be addressed in the Final Planning Obligations SPD. The statement also sets out how those organisations and individuals were consulted. 1.2 The overall approach to community engagement has been carried out in accordance with these regulations and the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement. 2. CONTEXT 2.1 The new Local Plan guides the development and use of land in Darlington. The Planning Obligations SPD will help with its implementation, providing essential, detailed guidance on the operation of several Core Strategy policies: i) Key policy CS4: Developer Contributions, that applies to all forms of development; and ii) Criteria based policies where planning obligations are one element of the policy, relating to a specific form of development (Policies CS3, CS11, CS12, CS15, CS17, CS18 and CS19). 2.2 Once adopted, the SPD will become the basis for securing developer contributions, also known as planning obligations or Section 106 agreements to help secure the infrastructure which is required to help mitigate the impact of new development. Once adopted by the Council, the Planning Obligations SPD will have weight when making decisions on planning applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Sdoy-Economystupid
    Sustainable Designs on You Housing for Health and Value It’s the Economy, Stupid! It’s the Economy, Stupid! – setting the scene – what can be done at a practical level to address sustainable development in housing? – is it just about cost? – What else needs to be considered? Context In Scotland there are approximately: – 1.6 million owner-occupied homes; – 233,000 privately rented homes; – 261,477 homes rented from housing associations; – 346,179 homes rented from local authorities. According to the 2001 census, there are 29,299 second and holiday homes comprising 1.3 per cent of the total housing stock. There are 87,000 empty homes across Scotland. — It’s the Economy, Stupid! – housing consumes large amounts of resources in its construction, maintenance and use; – the construction and use of dwellings make significant contributions to greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide; – it is a fixed asset with a long life; – can have effects on transport, health, employment, economy and community. How many houses are being built in Scotland? In 2006-07 there were: – 20,037 dwellings built by the private sector; – 3,620 dwellings built by housing associations; – just 6 dwellings built by local authorities. These figures refer to completed new build properties for each of these sectors. Firm Foundations TARGET: 35,000 homes per year — It’s the Economy, Stupid! Social sustainability House Building Industry – is the largest private investment in Scotland; – contributes £6bn to the economy annually; – Employs 100,000 people. Social Rented
    [Show full text]
  • Large Housing Sites
    Housing Land Supply by District 2013 District: BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE 0300 Developer: BRYANT HOMES THOMAS HOMES PERSIMMON HOMES TAYLOR W PARK PREWETT APPREF TYPE DECDATE DWLNGS MILL ROAD Previously developed land: PART BROWNFIELD PARK PREWETT Planning Status: PERMISSION 71914 BDB FULL 20/12/2010 122 BASINGSTOKE 68931 BDB FULL 14/08/2008 5 Easting 461615 64844 BDB FULL 12/04/2007 137 Site status: UNDER CONSTRUCTION Northing 153731 56725 BDB RES 17/11/2005 1021 Comments: Description: 48485 BDB RES 25/09/2000 27 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - 1330 DWELLINGS INCLUDES 269 AFFORDABLE DWELLINGS 46887 BDB PART A RES 06/04/2000 98 46887 BDB PART B RES 06/04/2000 24 42565 BDB PART B FULL 18/03/1998 31 Total area in hectares: Net Phasing - Projected dwelling completions 31.2 42565 BDB PART A FULL 18/03/1998 126 Actual Net Dwellings Gains Losses 37260 BDB O/L 29/05/1997 1250 Gains Net Net Total Other Total: 1330 1 2013 Available Permitted 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2013/2019 Supply Unlikely Completed: 1232 1 34 98 98 35 33 30 0 0 0 98 0 0 Available: 98 0 0317 Developer: POPLEY APPREF TYPE DECDATE DWLNGS SHERBORNE ROAD Previously developed land: GREENFIELD POPLEY Planning Status: PERMISSION 73174 BDB O/L 04/01/2012 784 BASINGSTOKE 70441 BDB FULL 25/06/2009 28 Easting 462850 65087 BDB RES 04/04/2007 87 Site status: UNDER CONSTRUCTION Northing 154221 64845 BDB RES 23/02/2007 79 Comments: Description: 56462 BDB O/L 10/06/2004 950 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ESTIMATED 950 DWELLINGS SUBJECT TO 20% AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry's Introduction to Construction of Buildings
    P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML BY032-FM BY032-Emmitt BY032-v1.cls September 13, 2004 8:48 BARRY’S INTRODUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS i P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML BY032-FM BY032-Emmitt BY032-v1.cls September 13, 2004 8:48 ii P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML BY032-FM BY032-Emmitt BY032-v1.cls September 13, 2004 8:48 BARRY’S INTRODUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS Stephen Emmitt and Christopher A. Gorse iii P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML BY032-FM BY032-Emmitt BY032-v1.cls September 13, 2004 8:48 C 2005 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the estate of Robin Barry Editorial offices: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1865 776868 Blackwell Publishing Inc., 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA Tel: +1 781 388 8250 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia Tel: +61 (0)3 8359 1011 The right of the Author to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2005 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Emmitt, Stephen.
    [Show full text]