5Th October 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5Th October 2000 Civic Centre, Crook, County Durham. DL15 9ES Tel: 01388 765555 Fax: 01388 766660 Minicom: 01388 761515 e-mail: [email protected] Iain Phillips Chief Executive 6th February 2007 Dear Councillor, You are hereby summoned to attend a MEETING of the WEAR VALLEY DISTRICT COUNCIL which will be held in the COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC CENTRE, CROOK on WEDNESDAY, 14th FEBRUARY 2007 at 6.00 P.M. for the purpose of transacting the business set out in the Agenda hereunder. Yours faithfully Chief Executive AGENDA Page No. 1. Apologies for absence. 2. To confirm the Minutes of the meeting of the Council held 6th 1 – 12 December 2006 as a true record. 3. To confirm the Minutes of the special meeting of the Council held on 13 – 14 19th January 2007. 4. To receive any announcements by the Chair of the Council. 5. To receive any announcements by the Leader of the Council. 6. To receive, in the order listed below, oral reports by the Chairs of Policy Committees, and, if approved, to adopt as is necessary the Reports and recommendations of the following Committees, as printed and circulated:- (a) Housing Services 13.12.06 15 – 18 (b) Regeneration 10.01.07 19 – 25 (c) Community Services 17.01.07 26 – 28 (d) Special Central Resources 15.12.06 29 – 30 (e) Central Resources 24.01.07 31 – 36 (f) Policy and Strategic Development 31.01.07 37 – 39 7. To receive, and if approved, to adopt as is necessary the Reports and recommendations of the following regulatory Committees, as printed and circulated:- (a) Licensing 14.12.06 40 – 42 (b) Development Control 07.12.06 43 – 51 (c) Development Control 04.01.07 52 – 59 (d) Development Control 01.02.07 to follow TO: All Members of the Council Management Team COUNCIL MEETING 6th DECEMBER 2006 PRESENT Councillor Murphy (Chair) Councillor Mrs Jones (Deputy Chair) Councillors Anderson, Bailey, Mrs Brown, Mrs Burn, Dobinson, Mrs Douthwaite, Ferguson, Gale, Grogan, Harker, Harrison, Hayton, Jago, Kay, Kingston, Laurie, McKeller, Mowbray, Nevins, Perkins, Mrs Pinkney, Seabury, V Shuttleworth, Sinclair, Stonehouse, Strongman, Taylor, Mts Todd, Townsend, David Wilson, Des Wilson and Zair ADVISERS I Phillips, Chief Executive; M Laing, Strategic Director for Community; J Docherty, Chief Officer, Corporate Development; D Townsend, Head of Development and Building Control and Miss S Spence, Head of Committee and Democratic Service. APOLOGIES Councillors Foote Wood, Moody and Mrs Lee. 346. MINUTES The Minutes of the meeting of the Council held on 18th October 2006, as printed and circulated were taken as read, confirmed as a true record and signed by the Chair. 347. CHAIR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Adam Zair The Chair was pleased to announce that Adam Zair, son of Councillor Sam Zair, had been declared one of the top three young organists in the country. Adam, 16, had finished third in the Young Theatre Organist of the Year competition. It had been the first time Adam, who had been playing the organ since he was seven, had showcased his skills in a competition. On behalf of the Council the Chair congratulated Adam on his achievement. Neil Murphy The Chair was also very proud to announce that his son Neil had that month, won a Regional Award for Administration and Training. 1 100th Birthday The Chair had had the pleasure of presenting a lady 100 years young with a bouquet of flowers. He had wished her many more happy birthdays to come. Signpost, Crook The Chair was pleased to note that Signpost, Crook was referred to in Committee Minutes being considered that evening. He had recently resigned from Signpost on doctor’s orders; he had done so prior to Signpost’s approach to the Council. He, along with his Crook Councillors, in particular Councillor Mowbray, had long believed that Signpost was of utmost importance to the people of Crook and the Town’s surrounding areas. As a past trustee and former Chair and Vice-Chair of the Board, he believed he was qualified to comment on the need of the service to Crook and its surrounding areas. When he had first joined the Board only a handful of ‘customers’ had crossed the doorstep. Now thousands per year used the service. Therefore, in his opinion Signpost was worthy of support to enable them time to secure their own future. functions attended by the chair of the council Charity Evening, Chilton Town Council Darlington’s Civic Ball Durham County Civic Ball Sedgefield Charity Bond Evening Wear Valley District Council Bonfire Night Peterlee Mayor’s Charity Ball Switch Lights on at ASDA Bishop Auckland Charity Evening, Seaham Town Council Sunderland Civic Ball Willington Annual Chrysanthemum Show Crook and Bishop Auckland Remembrance Service Bishop Auckland Licensed Traders Association Annual Dinner Showman’s Guild Annual Luncheon Exclusive tour of Durham Cathedral Youth Forum Presentation Gateshead Civic Dinner Sid Chaplin Short Story Competition, Shildon Town Council Switching on of Xmas Lights, Seaham Town Council Switching on of Xmas Lights, Willington Wonderland St John Ambulance Charity Curry/Buffet Lunch Bad Oeynhausen Twinning Visit functions attended by the deputy chair of the council Durham City Charity Fashion Show Charity Evening, Chilton Town Council 2 Spennymoor Town Council Civic Dinner Durham County Civic Carol Service Charity Coffee Morning, Sedgefield Borough chair’s appeal fund The Chair’s Charity Appeal Fund currently stood at £3423.57 348. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE LEADER OF THE COUNCIL The Leader of the Council referred to the last meeting of the Council when he had referred to a meeting with Durham MPs, which had taken place in the House of Commons on 22nd November, to raise concerns about the present draft of the Regional Spatial Strategy. The meeting had been attended by three MPs and Lord Foster of Auckland. All Districts and the County Council had been represented. The MPs and Lord Foster were fully behind the Councils position and offered all the support they could, including lobbying Ministers. One idea floated at the meeting had been to develop a press launch around a campaign of pledges for Durham i.e. things that the Councils would like to see for the county (maybe up to ten) and have prominent county figures from all sectors endorsing the pledges. Wear Valley represented by the Director of Environment and Regeneration had been leading on this and he understood the work was well advanced and a launch date before Christmas was envisaged. On Local Government review, as Members would be aware, the previous Wednesday the County Labour Group overwhelmingly endorsed the decision to put in a bid for a County Unitary under the proposals in the new White Paper. District Leaders had met on the previous Friday to discuss their position and the consensus from that meeting was (a) unanimous opposition to the County bid and (b) that the Districts should submit a pathfinder enhanced two tier bid. There was some disagreement from this Authority and Chester-le-Street as to whether it was possible to submit such a bid without the support of the County. Written clarification was being sought to clarify this point. He believed that the Council should endorse the position of the other districts to sustain unanimity but that it should continue to pursue the case within the districts’ forum for a South Durham Unitary, particularly as the Districts may need to reconsider their present position in the light of further clarification from GONE or DCLG. The Council should vigorously oppose the County bid because it would not benefit the people of Wear Valley. At the end of the day this was not about sustaining Councils or careers but about getting the best vision, the best governance and the best service provision for the people of Wear Valley and no Unitary County could provide that. In 2000 this Council, demonstrating its community leadership role, became the first local authority to add the name of a soldier shot at dawn to the local war memorial. Sgt. Will Stones was now duly remembered with his 3 other comrades. The Council also asked the Government to grant a Millennium Pardon to all those others shot for similar offences. The Government were not minded to at that time, but, following dogged persistence from such campaigners as John Hipkin and Andrew Mackinley MP the Government relented and granted pardons to these men earlier this year. He was delighted at this and he was very proud of this Council’s action because he knew how much it meant to the Stones family. He was aware that a number of Councils had followed Wear Valley’s lead, but it had not been universal. He suggested that that be pointed out to the LGA, in the light of the Governments decision, as it is appropriate for all councils to consider adding the names of these men to the proper memorials. It cost very little but would mean so very much. This course of action was AGREED. 349. REGENERATION COMMITTEE: 1st NOVEMBER 2006 Consideration was given to the Minutes of the above meeting. The Chair of the Regeneration Committee stated that, in light of the comments by the Leader of the Council regarding Local Government Review and whatever the outcome, this Authority would continue to plan for the future for the benefit of residents of the area. The Strategic Director of Environment and Regeneration had given a further update to the Committee on the Regional Spatial Strategy. The Committee had endorsed the action identified to raise awareness of the issues. He had highlighted progress made in the areas of building control, economic regeneration and private sector housing. All targets had been hit from July in respect of planning applications in order to assess the maximum planning delivery grant.
Recommended publications
  • Consultation Statement for SPD3
    Consultation Statement Supplementary Planning Document SPD3: Parking Standards and Design February 2012 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK LOCAL Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 -1- Trafford LDF – SPD3: Parking Standards and Design Consultation Statement – February 2012 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Statement of Community Involvement Review ......................................... 3 3 Public Consultation ................................................................................... 3 4 Inspecting the Scoping and Issues and SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers .............................................................................. 4 5 Representations on the Scoping and Issues SPD and the SPD3: Parking Standards and Design consultation papers ..................................................... 4 6 Consultation Responses and Main Issues ................................................ 5 7 Main Changes to the SPD ........................................................................ 5 8. Next Steps ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix 1 - Specific Consultees ................................................................. 8 Appendix 2 – General Consultees ................................................................ 9 Appendix 3 – Other Consultation Bodies ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Mm NO
    1 AGENDA mM NO.----.---------.I Application No. S/99/00886/OUT Date registered 20thJuly 1999 APPLICANT EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT LTD, PALACE HOUSE, NEWPORT, NP9 4EA Agent Stangate Investments (Aylesbury) Ltd, Henstaff Court Business Centre, Gloesfaen, Cardiff DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INTO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CREATION OF ANCILLARY OPENSPACE AND ACCESS ROAD LOCATION ‘CARFIN VILLAGE’, CARFNHOLYTOWN LINK ROAD (A732) CARFIN, MOTHERWELL Ward No. 5 Grid Reference 276600658600 File Reference S/PL/B/5/56( 1 I 8)/CLK/JF Site History 1. S/95/00635/OUT - Redevelopment of ‘Carfin Bond’ site to allow for residential development, neighbourhood centre and public open space. Granted 1 1/7/96 2. S/98/00108/REM - Details of Access Arrangements to Site from A723. Granted 9/3/98 3. Mineral and Contamination Remediation Measures. Approved 29/1/98 4. S/98/0 1208/REM - Construction of 1 18 Houses and 3 8 Flats (Ogilvie Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 5. S/98/01560/OUT- Construction of Dwellinghouses (outline) on site of playground to rear of Hillhead Crescent. Application under consideration. 6. S/98/01564/FUL - Construction of New Road Link Between redevelopment Site and Carfin Street (via Bruce Road) - granted 10/5/99 7. S/98/01244/REM - Construction of 104 Houses and 28 Flats (Bellway Homes) - Granted 8/2/99 8. S/99/00598/FUL - Construction of 88 Houses (Barratt Homes), partly in lieu of Ogilvie Homes development. Granted 9. Construction of 90 houses (McLean Homes) - Granted 2/6/99 This supercedes the ‘Bellway’ proposal. Development Plan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultee List
    Consultee List • A43 Action Group • BBD • Abbey Developments Ltd • BDP • Acorn Homes • Beanfield Junior School • Adams Holmes Associates • Beanfield Tenants & Residents Association • Afro Caribbean Association • Bedford Borough Council • Age Concern Northampton & County • Bedford Group Of Drainage Boards • Age Concern Wellingborough • Bedford PCT • Aldwincle Parish Council • Bedfordshire County Council • Alfred Street Junior School • Bee Bee Developments Ltd • Alfred Underwood Limited • Bell Cornwell Partnership • Al-Jamaat Ul-Muslimin Of Bangladesh • Bellway Homes • All Saints CE Primary School • Bellway Homes Ltd • All Saints Church Mears Ashby • Benefield Parish Council • All Saints Gt Harrowden & St Marys Lt Harrowden and • Berkeley Community Villages St Mary’s Orlingbury • Berry Morris • Amec E&E (UK) Ltd • Berry's • Ancer SPA • Bidwells • Andrew Granger & Co LLP • Bidwells Property Consultants • Anglian Water Services Limited • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • Apethorpe Parish Meeting • Billing Parish Council • Appletree Homes Ltd • Bishop Stopford School • Aragon Land And Planning Uk Ltd • Blackthorn Residents Association • Arc Recycled Materials • Blatherwycke Parish Meeting • Archaelogical And Historical Society • Blenheim Property Associates • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Blenheim Realty • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Bletsoes • Arriva UK Ltd • Bloomfields Ltd • Arthingworth Parish Council • Bloor Homes • Arts Council England East Midlands • Boothville Community Council • Ashley Parish Council • Borough
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Request 7862
    FOI Ref Response sent 7862 13 Oct 20 (CCC) Taylor Wimpey - Council Tax & NNDR Credit/Refund Request A) Can you please confirm if your Authority in both the council tax and business rates department holds accounts for Taylor Wimpey or its Subsidiaries listed below (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes. B) Please advise if you have any accounts that currently have credits, write-on’s, or rate overpayments held on account for Taylor Wimpey and its subsidiaries; including but not limited to Bryant Homes, Taylor Woodrow, George Wimpey, Taylor Wimpey, Mclean Homes, Laing Homes & McAlpine Homes in relation to all domestic Council tax and Non-Domestic Business Rates rating matters (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax). If yes; B1) Please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates start and end, the amount of credit due. (Ideally provide data by excel) C) Please can you confirm if any accounts are overdue or with enforcement agents (Yes or No will be fine but please specify NNDR or Ctax) If yes; C1) If Yes please provide the account number, full account name, full account address including postcode, occupation dates both start and end date if applicable, amount charged, and any fees. Response: Thank you for your request for information above, which we have dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report April 2010 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact: Planning Policy Team Communities, Regeneration & Environment Directorate Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council FREEPOST Stockport SK1 3YQ Telephone: 0161 474 4395 Fax: 0161 474 4586 Core Strategy DPD: Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report Annex 1 Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Stockport Core Strategy DPD Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Date: September 2009 (Reviewed January 2010) Author: Angie Jukes, BSc, MSc. Health & Environment Advisor (Planning) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Reviewed by: Dr Stephen Watkins, Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport Health Impact Assessment Team at NHS Stockport Planning Policy Team at Stockport MBC Stockport Local Strategic Partnership Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Stockport’s Local Development Framework 2.2 Why do Health Impact Assessment? 2.3 Sustainability Appraisal 2.4 HIA Methodology 2.5 A Health Portrait of Stockport 3.0 HIA Rapid Assessment Findings 3.1 Environmental Conditions 3.2 Socio Economic & Cultural Conditions 3.3 Social & Community Networks 3.4 Lifestyle 4.0 Conclusions & Recommendations to Policy Makers 4.1 Significant Issues 4.2 Health Prevention 4.3 Two birds with one stone 4.4 Recommendations 5.0 Consultation Process & Next Steps Appendix 1 NHS Stockport Pro Forma Drafted Application to Core Strategy Emerging Objectives & Policies 1.0 Executive Summary The Local Development Framework (LDF) incorporates the Core Strategy which is the most important document in the LDF because it sets an overall strategy and vision, establishing the broad aims and objectives for the use of land in Stockport.
    [Show full text]
  • Psd10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance
    PSD10a Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance February 2017 Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance | February 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number Job number Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Admiral House Rose Wharf 78 East Street Leeds LS9 8EE United Kingdom www.arup.com Sunderland City Council and South Tyneside Council International Advanced Manufacturing Park Area Action Plan Statement of Compliance Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Compliance Report 1 1.2 Structure of this report 2 1.3 Introduction to the IAMP 2 1.4 Development Plan 3 1.5 Planning for the IAMP 4 1.6 Why an Area Action Plan 7 2 Legal and Procedural Compliance 9 2.1 National and European Legal and Procedural Requirements 9 2.1.1 Localism Act 2011 9 2.1.2 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 9 2.2 Legal Requirements for Consultation and engagement 9 2.2.1 Statements of Community Involvement 10 2.2.2 Local Development Scheme 12 2.3 Legal Requirements of the Duty to Cooperate 12 2.4 Legal Requirements for the Sustainability Appraisal 13 2.4.1 Evidence of Compliance 15 2.5 Legal Requirement for the Habitats Regulation Assessment 18 2.5.1 Evidence of Compliance 18 3 Consultation Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Building on Strong Foundations 2001 December 1 WP066 AR 2001 COVER V3 Tp 6/3/02 2:33 Pm Page FC2
    1 WP066 AR_2001 COVER_v3 tp 6/3/02 2:37 pm Page FC1 january february march Annual Report & Accounts 2001 april may june july august september october november Annual Report & Accounts 2001 building on strong foundations 2001 december 1 WP066 AR_2001 COVER_v3 tp 6/3/02 2:33 pm Page FC2 Our commitment to create and deliver value for our customers and shareholders has determined the ways in which we have brought changes to George Wimpey. By continuing to create real value we will achieve our goal of becoming a truly successful housebuilder measured by customers and shareholders alike. Contents Financial Highlights 02 Chairman’s Statement 03 Chief Executive’s Review 04 2001 – The Year That Changed George Wimpey 06 Operating and Financial Review 14 Environmental, Health and Safety Report 20 Board of Directors 21 Corporate Governance 22 Remuneration Report 24 Directors’ Report 27 Group Profit and Loss Account 30 Balance Sheet 31 Group Cash Flow Statement 32 Accounting Policies 33 Notes on the Accounts 34 Auditors’ Report 48 Five Year Review 49 Notice of Meeting 50 George Wimpey PLC Business Directory UK and US 53 Shareholder Information IBC George Wimpey Annual Report & Accounts 2001 During 2001 we have changed to create a new and rejuvenated business. We are rebuilding our Company to ensure that George Wimpey offers a long term secure and rewarding investment for our shareholders. George Wimpey Annual Report & Accounts 2001 02 Financial Highlights Year ended 31 December 2001 2000 Turnover £1895.9m £1702.0m Operating profit* £213.1m £170.2m
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Letters to the Department for Transport Seeking and Granting Permission to Carry out a Targeted Consultation
    SECTION 153 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008, PARAGRAPH 2 OF REGULATION 6 OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (CHANGES TO, AND REVOCATION OF, DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDERS) REGULATIONS 2011 (AS AMENDED) APPLICATION TO MAKE A NON-MATERIAL CHANGE TO THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER: The A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 (SI 2016 No 547) (as corrected by the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent (Correction) Order 2017 (SI 2017/1121)) 5. Letters to the Department for Transport seeking and granting permission to carry out a targeted consultation January 2019 Our ref:TR010018 Woodlands Manton Lane Bedford MK41 7LW Natasha Kopala Head of TWA Orders Unit Department for Transport 26 November 2018 Zone 1/14 – 18 Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Dear Ms Kopala, Proposed non-material change to the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations: Regulation 7(3) – request for exemption from consulting with certain stakeholders on the above application In January 2015 the then Highways Agency submitted a DCO application for the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme. The A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 2016 (the Order) was subsequently made by the Secretary of State for Transport on 11 May 2016. The original DCO submission, documentation and decision can be found on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. Following the Roads Minister’s instruction to Highways England, in 2018, requesting that the new A14 be classified as a motorway, Highways England intends to seek consent from the Secretary of State to make a non-material change to the Order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing Forum
    What consumers thought about… The Housing Forum Base: All respondents (9,913 in 2003, 10,015 in Key 2001 and 10,283 in 2000) Source: MORI Very Fairly Neither/nor Fairly Very No opinion satisfied satisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied National Customer Satisfaction Survey 2003 Designed by Lillington Green 0118 927Designed by Lillington 2474 Green 0118 …the quality of the home …the service from their housebuilder New Home Owners Survey The 2003 National Customer Satisfaction Survey is the third survey conducted among owners of newly built homes; Overall satisfaction with quality Overall satisfaction with service Q15 Taking everything into account, overall, how satisfied or Q2 Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with previous surveys were conducted in 2001 and 2000. Commissioned independently by the Housing Forum – Constructing dissatisfied are you with the quality of your home? the service provided by your housebuilder, taking into Excellence and sponsored by the DTI and ODPM, the survey is designed to provide an analysis of the trends of customer 83 12 account the service both before and after you moved in? satisfaction within the private house building industry over the last three years and form a guide to advise consumers of the 2003 40 43 6 7 5 * +71 65 26 above average performers in the industry this year. In conjunction with the survey results the Housing Forum has produced 87 8 2003 24 41 10 14 12 * +39 2001 43 44 5 5 3 * +79 70 21 a consumer guidance leaflet, What you need to check when buying a newly built property – 10 top tips on key 87 8 2001 27 43 9 12 9 * +49 2000 45 42 4 5 3 * +79 69 23 issues to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Wimpey Annual Report and Accounts 2020
    Taylor Wimpey plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Emerging StrongerAnnual Report and Accounts 2020 www.taylorwimpey.co.uk Contents Taylor Wimpey plc is a customer-focused residential Strategic report developer building and delivering homes and 2 Chairman’s statement communities across the UK and in Spain. 4 Chief Executive’s statement 6 Our market environment 10 Our response in 2020 12 Our equity raise 14 Our management 16 Our robust investment case 18 Our purpose 20 Our business model Our purpose 22 Our strategy and key performance indicators 26 Materiality assessment 28 Our stakeholders 42 Environmental strategy Our response is to build great 44 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Our equity raise in 2020 46 Our approach to identifying and managing risk See pages 12 and 13 See pages 10 and 11 49 Principal Risks and uncertainties homes and 54 Group financial review Directors’ report: governance 60 Chairman’s Statement 62 Governance at a glance create thriving 80 Nomination and Governance Committee report 90 Audit Committee report 98 Remuneration Committee report communities. 121 Statutory, regulatory and other information Financial statements 124 Independent auditor’s report Emerging 130 Consolidated income statement stronger for our 131 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income Our purpose stakeholders This is what our teams come to work to do each 132 Consolidated balance sheet See pages 18 and 19 See pages 28 to 41 133 Consolidated statement of changes in equity and every day and is where the core drivers of 134 Consolidated cash flow statement value for all our stakeholders ultimately lie. 135 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 165 Company balance sheet 2020 has not been a normal year.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Welcome Our vision is to be Creating value the UK’s leading residential by delivering developer for quality creating value and Annual Report and Accounts 2015 delivering quality What’s inside 2 Strategic Report 42 Governance 92 Financial Statements 147 Shareholder Information Delivering quality for all our stakeholders Sustainability Report 2015 Visit us online at www.taylorwimpey.co.uk In This Report 2015 Overview Strategic Report Our integrated approach Operational highlights 4 Where We Operate As part of our continued commitment to good • Completed a total of 13,219 homes, 6 Our Investment Case reporting, this year we have evolved the way we 8 Our Market Review report by integrating aspects of our sustainability, excluding joint ventures, across the UK, 10 Chairman’s Statement operating review and Key Performance Indicators up 7.5% (2014: 12,294 homes) 12 Chief Executive’s Review into our Business Model. Our aim is to balance 16 Our Strategy the long term economic stability and growth of our • 8.0% increase in total average selling 18 Our Business Model Company with our responsibilities to the environment, society and the local economies in which we operate. price to £230k (2014: £213k) 34 Our Approach to Risk Management See our Chief Executive’s • Short term landbank of c.76k plots 36 Principal Risks and Uncertainties Review on page 12 Where can I find key information? 38 Group Financial Review with 60% sourced from the strategic Investors Our Investment Case pages 6 to 7 land pipeline Chief Executive’s Review pages 12 to 17 Our Business
    [Show full text]