DOCSLIB.ORG

Taylor Woodrow and Bryant: an Excellent Strategic Fit L the Enlarged UK Housing Business L Conclusion and Questions 3 Termsterms Ofof Thethe Offeroffer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taylor Woodrow and Bryant: an Excellent Strategic Fit L the Enlarged UK Housing Business L Conclusion and Questions 3 Termsterms Ofof Thethe Offeroffer TaylorTaylor WoodrowWoodrow andand BryantBryant AnAn ExcellentExcellent StrategicStrategic FitFit Presentation to Analysts 22 January 2001 2 ContentsContents l Introduction l Terms of the offer l Taylor Woodrow and Bryant: An excellent strategic fit l The enlarged UK housing business l Conclusion and questions 3 TermsTerms ofof thethe offeroffer l For each Bryant share: 80p in cash and 0.72 New Taylor Woodrow shares l Valuing Bryant at £556 million l Premium of 26.9%* l Consideration to be given to £100 million share buy back l Mix and Match Election * over closing price of 163.5p per Bryant share on 10th January 2001 4 HubertHubert ReidReid Chairman,Chairman, BryantBryant GroupGroup plcplc 5 TheThe BryantBryant perspectiveperspective l Opportunity for Bryant’s brand to play a full role in the creation of a modern, customer-oriented business l Opportunity for Bryant’s shareholders to benefit in Taylor Woodrow’s future 6 KeithKeith EgertonEgerton ChiefChief ExecutiveExecutive TaylorTaylor WoodrowWoodrow 7 OurOur StrategyStrategy Drive towards leadership positions: l Focus on housing and property as core activities l Re-focus construction on specialist expertise l UK housing targeted for major growth UTILISE FULL COMPLEMENT OF TAYLOR WOODROW’S SKILLS 8 TheThe ActionsActions SoSo FarFar l Growing UK Housing operation l Re-structured North American operations l Complementary commercial development programme l Disposed of non-core assets l Re-focused construction 9 FiveFive yearyear reviewreview Profit before tax (£m) 160 150.0 140 125.0 120 100.3 100 82.1 80 66.8 60 46.0 40 72.3 20 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Nultex Global Estimates 2000 Published Results (2000 - Half Year Results) 10 MovingMoving forwardsforwards l Commissioned internal and external research on UK housing companies l Bryant identified as best fit l Detailed evaluation of Bryant undertaken 11 WhyWhy Bryant?Bryant? l Complementary geographical spread of premier sites l Proven land purchase and planning skills l A strong brand and well developed housing products l Respected management expertise EXCELLENT STRATEGIC FIT - CREATES UK’S 5TH LARGEST HOUSEBUILDER 12 FinancialFinancial BenefitsBenefits ofof MergerMerger l Synergies and savings estimated at £10-15 million per annum l Expected to be earning enhancing * in first full year of operation * before goodwill and restructuring charges but after synergies 13 PaulPaul PhippsPhipps ExecutiveExecutive Director,Director, HousingHousing TaylorTaylor WoodrowWoodrow 14 NewNew UKUK HousingHousing BusinessBusiness PLATFORM FOR GROWTH l Truly national spread of activities l Complementary skills l Product mix l Strategic land activities 15 StructureStructure ofof EnlargedEnlarged BusinessBusiness l Bryant Homes Limited l Three main regions: – Northern & Scotland – Central – South East & West l 15 operating areas, average 400 dwellings per annum l Standards, efficiency and customer focus l Management and employees of Bryant essential to success of merged business 16 BobBob HawleyHawley ChairmanChairman TaylorTaylor WoodrowWoodrow 17 SummarySummary TheThe EnlargedEnlarged GroupGroup l A balanced international business l Strength and critical mass in UK Housebuilding Sector l Earnings enhancing l Strong platform for growth 18 KeyKey DatesDates l First closing dates . February 2001 l Taylor Woodrow EGM . February 2001 l Last day for acceptances . March 2001 Draft 4 - Core Presentation (For Analysts) TaylorTaylor WoodrowWoodrow andand BryantBryant AnAn ExcellentExcellent StrategicStrategic FitFit Presentation to Analysts 22 January 2001 20 SectorSector rankingsrankings -- byby volumevolume Rank (Company) No of units Rank (Company) No of units 1 Wimpey (G) 12,365 10 Bryant 3,961 2 Barratt Dev. 10,636 11 Wilson Bowden 3,623 3 Beazer 7,509 12 Redrow 3,338 4 Persimmon 7,101 13 Berkeley 2,915 5 TW/Bryant 5,974 14 Bovis Homes 2,429 6 Bellway 5,714 15 Crest Nicholson 2,422 7 Wilson (C) 4,700 16 Taylor Woodrow 2,013 8 Westbury 4,355 17 Fairview 1,640 9 McAlpine (A) 4,013 18 McCarthy & Stone 1,536 21 RegionalRegional officeoffice structurestructure Bryant TW Current overlap Review locations Possible new location.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    Costain Group PLC PLC Costain Group Costain House Nicholsons Walk Being Number One Maidenhead Costain Group PLC Berkshire SL6 1LN Annual Report 2005 Telephone 01628 842444 www.costain.com Annual Report 2005 Costain is an international Financial calendar engineering and construction Half year results – Announced 31 August 2005 Full year results – Announced 15 March 2006 company, seen as an Report & Accounts – Sent to shareholders 28 March 2006 Annual General Meeting – To be held 27 April 2006 Half year results 2005 – To be announced 30 August 2006 automatic choice for projects Analysis of Shareholders Shares requiring innovation, initiative, Accounts (millions) % Institutions, companies, individuals and nominees: Shareholdings 100,000 and over 156 321.92 90.39 teamwork and high levels of Shareholdings 50,000 – 99,999 93 6.37 1.69 Shareholdings 25,000 – 49,999 186 6.01 1.79 Shareholdings 5,000 – 24,999 1,390 13.78 3.87 technical and managerial skills. Shareholdings 1 – 4,999 12,848 8.06 2.26 14,673 356.14 100.00 Secretary and Registered Office Secretary Registrar and Transfer Office Clive L Franks Lloyds TSB Registrars The Causeway Registered Office Worthing Costain Group PLC West Sussex Costain House BN99 6DA Nicholsons Walk Telephone 0870 600 3984 Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 1LN Telephone 01628 842444 www.costain.com [email protected] Company Number 1393773 Shareholder information The Company’s Registrar is Lloyds TSB Registrars, The Causeway, Worthing, West Sussex BN99 6DA. For enquiries regarding your shareholding, please telephone 0870 600 3984. You can also view up-to-date information abourt your holdings by visiting the shareholder web site at www.shareview.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Woodrow Plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our Aim Is to Be the Homebuilder of Choice
    Taylor Woodrow plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our aim is to be the homebuilder of choice. Our primary business is the development of sustainable communities of high-quality homes in selected markets in the UK, North America, Spain and Gibraltar. We seek to add shareholder value through the achievement of profitable growth and effective capital management. Contents 01 Group Financial Highlights 54 Consolidated Cash Flow 02 Chairman’s Statement Statement 05 Chief Executive’s Review 55 Notes to the Consolidated 28 Board of Directors Financial Statements 30 Report of the Directors 79 Independent Auditors’ Report 33 Corporate Governance Statement 80 Accounting Policies 37 Directors’ Remuneration Report 81 Company Balance Sheet 46 Directors’ Responsibilities 82 Notes to the Company Financial Statement Statements 47 Independent Auditors’ Report 87 Particulars of Principal Subsidiary 48 Accounting Policies Undertakings 51 Consolidated Income Statement 88 Five Year Review 52 Consolidated Statement of 90 Shareholder Facilities Recognised Income and Expense 92 Principal Taylor Woodrow Offices 53 Consolidated Balance Sheet Group Financial Highlights • Group revenues £3.68bn (2005: £3.56bn) • Housing profit from operations* £469m (2005: £456m) • Profit before tax £406m (2005: £411m) • Basic earnings per share 50.5 pence (2005: 50.6 pence) • Full year dividend 14.75 pence (2005: 13.4 pence) • Net gearing 18.6 per cent (2005: 23.7 per cent) • Equity shareholders’ funds per share 364.7 pence (2005: 338.4 pence) Profit before tax £m 2006 405.6 2005 411.0 2004 403.9 Full year dividend pence (Represents interim dividends declared and paid and final dividend for the year as declared by the Board) 2006 14.75 2005 13.4 2004 11.1 Equity shareholders’ funds per share pence 2006 364.7 2005 338.4 2004 303.8 * Profit from operations is before joint ventures’ interest and tax (see Note 3, page 56).
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY World Class Civil Engineering
    SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY WORLD CLASS CIVIL ENGINEERING the future nvironment conomical ocial 1 Our Mission: Providing a sustainable business for the delivery of excellent Introduction projects Our Vision: Sustainability and environmental performance are often used interchangeably. To be the market leader in civil engineering To have a truly sustainable business, we must not only achieve (and exceed where possible) key social, environment and quality standards, but also meet Our Values and Behaviours: key financial commitments such as cash flow and profit. We aim to inspire all employees to meet our high standards The business has recognised for some time that our best performing projects and values in the execution of their duties, to act safely, to be not only have an excellent health, safety, environment and quality record but also environmentally and socially responsible through: perform well financially. Innovation In response to the sustainability challenge, in January 2013 Taylor Woodrow Partnerships launched its Sustainability Matrix. The matrix is part of core business strategy and People and Passion performance against each element of the matrix is discussed and reviewed monthly Strength, Diversity at the divisional management meetings. The matrix is comprised of a range of key and Dependability performance indicators (KPIs) split into three areas: • Economic • Social • Environment As referenced in Inside Civils, a competition was launched to create a logo which would help bring the strategy to life and capture the essence of Taylor Woodrow’s commitment to being a sustainable business; resilient and successful in the long term. Ella Secker (Consents Manager at NET) came up with the winning entry ‘SEE the future’ – the logo which is shown on the front cover.
    [Show full text]
  • (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward
    TYPE Title LastName Organisation/CompanyName (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Walsh OBE Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wild Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Dean Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Haslam Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Hall Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Challender Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Critchley Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wells Greenhalgh Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wilkinson Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Bashir-Ismail Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Darvesh Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Harkin Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Gillies Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ibrahim Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Spencer Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ayub Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Iqbal Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Murray Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Morris Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Thomas Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Zaman Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Clare Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Francis Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Mistry Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Allen Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Rushton Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors
    [Show full text]
  • Building Excellence
    Barratt Developments PLC Building excellence Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Inside this report 1 45 113 175 Strategic Report Governance Financial Statements Other Information 1 Key highlights 46 The Board 114 Independent Auditor’s Report 175 KPI definitions and why we measure 2 A snapshot of our business 48 Corporate governance report 119 Consolidated Income Statement 176 Glossary 4 Our performance and financial highlights 60 Nomination Committee report 119 Statement of Comprehensive Income 177 Other Information 6 How we create and preserve value 65 Audit Committee report 120 Statement of Changes in 8 Chairman’s statement 74 Safety, Health and Environment Shareholders’ Equity – Group 10 Key aspects of our market Committee report 121 Statement of Changes in 76 Remuneration report Shareholders’ Equity – Company 12 Chief Executive’s statement Notice regarding limitations on Directors’ liability under 106 Other statutory disclosures 122 Balance Sheets English law 17 Our Strategic priorities Under the Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the 112 Statement of Directors’ 123 Cash Flow Statements liability of Directors in respect of statements in, and omissions from, the Strategic Report contained on pages 1 to 44 and the Our principles Responsibilities 124 Notes to the Financial Statements Directors’ Report contained on pages 45 to 112. Under English Law the Directors would be liable to the Company (but not to 34 Keeping people safe any third party) if the Strategic Report and/or the Directors’ Report contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing 35 Being a trusted partner misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, 36 Building strong but would not otherwise be liable.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Audit: Assessing the Design Quality of New Homes
    1 SENSE OF PLACE SENSE OF PLACE 2 APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE ■ Main Street ■ Secondary Street ■ Tertiary Street / Lane / Courtyard 3 SAFETY ■ Is there active frontage on public spaces? ■ Is there overlooking frontage on public spaces? ■ Are the public spaces well lit? ■ Is there fenestration on two elevations at corners? 4 LEGIBILITY ■ Are there orientation markers? ■ Is there a series of events/spaces? 5 EXPLOITATION OF SITE’S ASSETS ■ Are existing buildings retained? ■ Is mature planting retained? ■ Does the layout respond to topography? 6 AVOIDANCE OF HIGHWAY DOMINANCE AND PEDESTRIAN REALM ROADS, PARKING ■ Do footpaths relate to building line? ■ Does the carriageway width vary? 7 PROMOTION OF NON-CAR TRAVEL ■ Is there a permeable network of routes? ■ Are the streets designed to calm traffic? ■ Are there dedicated bus/cycle lanes? ■ Is there safe cycle storage, close to homes? 8 CAR PARKING BUILDING FOR LIFE ■ Parking Type ■ Is it well integrated with public space? ■ Is parking visually unobtrusive? ■ Is it well integrated with planting? 9 SERVICING ■ Is the waste storage unobtrusive? ■ Are servicing arrangements well integrated? 10 MOVEMENT INTEGRATION ■ Are there connections to existing footpaths? ■ Are there multiple connections to the surrounding road network? ■ Is there easy access to main routes? ■ Does the development integrate with existing built development? 11 BESPOKE DESIGN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ■ Is bespoke design evident? ■ Is the local vernacular employed? 12 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY ■ Are good quality materials used? ■ Is attention
    [Show full text]
  • Responsibility Report
    Corporate Responsibility Report Watford Schools Art Competition To underline our commitment to Corporate Responsibility (CR), we set annual objectives by which we measure ourselves in key areas. In this section of our annual report, we provide a summary of our approach to Corporate Responsibility (CR) and an account of our achievements in 2009. To underline our commitment to CR, we set annual objectives by which we measure ourselves in key areas. Due to the relatively late acquisition of Haymills in the third quarter of 2009 and also for clarity of reporting, Haymills CR / sustainability activities have not been included. The information on the following pages details performance against the objectives we set in 2008 for 2009. Our CR Performance Data Tables are available to view on our website www.vinci.plc.uk/cr VINCI PLC Highlights 2009 Main Challenges for 2010 Health and safety performance continued to improve with There will be a number of significant challenges that we, along with the reportable accident incidence and frequency rates falling by as rest of the industry, will face in 2010. The current economic climate has much as 37% since 2006. already had an impact on work opportunities and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We continued to reduce environmental incidents and established consistent environmental KPIs across the business. We will retain our focus on driving improvement in our performance as a responsible business, focusing on the following areas: We successfully integrated the Norwest Holst and Taylor Woodrow people and our Diversity, Equality and Inclusivity Understanding and reducing our carbon footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2007 and Accounts Annual Report
    R&A 07 cover TPC.qxd:Layout 1 27/3/08 12:23 Page 1 Bovis Homes Group PLC Homes Group Bovis Annual report and accounts 2007 Annual report Annual report and accounts 2007 Bovis Homes Group PLC Bovis Homes Group PLC, The Manor House, North Ash Road, New Ash Green, Longfield, Kent DA3 8HQ. www.bovishomes.co.uk/plc Designed and produced by the Bovis Homes Graphic Design Department. Printed by Tewkesbury Printing Co. Limited accredited with ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. Printed using bio inks formulated from sustainable raw materials. The paper used for this report is from a mixed sources product, it is produced using 20% recycled wood and fibre, 60% de-inked fibre recovered from post-consumer sources, 10% virgin TCF fibre and 10% virgin fibre from forests. The manufacturers of the paper are accredited with the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System. www.bovishomes.co.uk/plc Cert no. TT-COC-002496 Contents 01 Financial highlights 03 Chairman’s statement 09 Report of the directors Business review 28 Directors and officers 29 Report of the directors 32 Corporate governance policy guidelines 33 Report on corporate governance 36 Report on the activities of the Audit Committee 37 Report on the activities of the Nomination Committee 38 Report on directors’ remuneration 47 Statement of directors’ responsibilities in respect of the annual report and accounts and the financial statements 48 Independent auditors’ report to the members of Bovis Homes Group PLC 49 Group income statement 49 Group statement of recognised income and expense 50
    [Show full text]
  • Ny Lihtc Properties.Pdf
    1 LIHTCPropertiesinNewYorkThrough2013 Annual Low Rentor TaxͲ HUDMultiͲFamily Zip Nonprofit Allocation Allocated YearPlaced Total Income Income Exempt Financing/Rental ProjectName Address City State Code Sponsor Year Amount inService ConstructionType Units Units Ceiling CreditPercentage Bond Assistance 1CalmanPl 1CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 1E35thSt 1E35thSt NewYork NY 10016 No 2006$ 1,340,766 2007 NewConstruction 91 90 60%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes 1HavenPlz 1HavenPlz NewYork NY 10009 No 2011$ 1,538,719 2012 AcquisitionAndRehab 372 371 30%presentvalue Yes Yes 1PleasantAveW 1PleasantAveW Lancaster NY 14086 1987 AcquisitionAndRehab 155 155 30%presentvalue No 1W137thSt 1W137thSt NewYork NY 10037 No 2012$ 267,841 2013 AcquisitionAndRehab 68 67 60%AMGI Both30%and70% No 10BayHeightsCir 10BayHeightsCir Geneva NY 14456 1989 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10CalmanPl 10CalmanPl Canandaigua NY 14424 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 10WeldonSt 10WeldonSt Rochester NY 14611 1988 NewConstruction 1 1 30%presentvalue No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2009$ 222,791 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue Yes No 101AvenueD 101AvenueDNewYork NY 10009 No 2013$ 202,106 2012 NewConstruction 16 16 50%AMGI 30%presentvalue No 101OntarioSt 101OntarioSt Rochester NY 14605 1991 1991 AcquisitionAndRehab 22 30%presentvalue No 101RailroadAve 101RailroadAve Goshen NY 10924 1996 1997 NewConstruction 85 84 70%presentvalue No 101S3rdSt 101S3rdSt Brooklyn NY 11249 Yes 1989$ 233,213 1989 AcquisitionAndRehab
    [Show full text]
  • Bovis Bounds to Top – with a Little Help from the Beeb Business Barometer £351M Salford Media City Takes Contractor to Number One in January
    06barometernjdray&!!!.qxd 12/02/2008 16:43 Page 20 20 news.finance.companies Bovis bounds to top – with a little help from the Beeb Business barometer £351m Salford Media City takes contractor to number one in January BY TOM BILL Top contractors excluding civils Top contractors including civils monthly work won, 1–31 January 2008 monthly work won, 1–31 January 2008 Bovis Lend Lease’s £351m deal to redevelop the 37-acre Media City site in Salford, Greater Manchester, propelled it to the top of the Number of Total Number of Total projects value (£m) projects value (£m) leader board in January. Bovis will act as management contractor on 1 – Bovis Lend Lease 4 399 1 – Bovis Lend Lease 4 399 2 9 Morgan Sindall 33 264 2 11 Morgan Sindall 35 289 the scheme, which will give the BBC a new 3 34 Sir Robert McAlpine 2 255 3 39 Sir Robert McAlpine 2 255 headquarters in north-west England. It also 4 3 HBG Construction 8 242 4 3 HBG Construction 8 242 picked up a £27.5m deal for the John Lennon 5 2 Balfour Beatty 28 158 5 2 Balfour Beatty 33 173 6 8 Miller 6 134 6 8 Miller 6 134 airport hotel in Liverpool. 7 4 Kier 28 121 7 1 Laing O’Rourke 4 132 In contrast to Bovis, which won only four 8 6 Carillion 8 75 8 4 Kier 29 123 contracts, Morgan Sindall moved up from 9 12 Rok 24 59 9 5 Carillion 17 90 10 – Sisk 9 59 10 10 Skanska 4 60 number nine to the second spot after 11 31 ISG 26 56 11 14 Rok 24 59 hoovering up 33 jobs, together worth £264m.
    [Show full text]
  • Epoc 2014 European Powers of Construction
    EPoC 2014 European Powers of Construction June 2015 EPoC is an annual publication produced by Deloitte and distributed free of charge Director Javier Parada, partner in charge of the Infrastructure Industry, Spain Coordinated by Margarita Velasco Martín Alurralde Serra Beltrán Fernández de Pinedo Published by CIBS Contact Infrastructure Department, Deloitte Madrid Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, S/N Torre Picasso 28020 Madrid, Spain Phone + 34 91 514 50 00 Fax + 34 91 514 51 80 June 2015 Contents 4 Introduction 5 Ranking of listed European construction companies 6 Top 50 EPoC – ranking by sales 7 Top 20 EPoC – ranking by market capitalisation 8 Outlook for the construction industry in the EU 13 Top 20 EPoC strategies: internationalisation and diversification 17 EPoC 2014 financial performance 28 Internationalisation: Business opportunities 36 Diversification of the EPoC 2014 39 Financing of EPoC 2014 41 Performance of non-European construction companies 49 Top 20 EPoC – Company profiles Introduction The twelfth edition of European Powers of Construction examines the performance of the major listed European construction groups in terms of revenue, market capitalisation, internationalisation, diversification, indebtedness and other financial ratios. We are pleased to present European Powers of percentage points, reaching 52.1% of total sales, while Construction 2014, our annual publication in which non-construction activity increased by 0.7 percentage we identify and outline the major listed European points to 26.2%. Additionally, we have again taken a construction groups. This publication examines the look at the main non-European construction groups, in market position and performance of the main players in order to draw comparisons with the figures and financial the industry in terms of revenue, market capitalisation, ratios recorded by our EPoC.
    [Show full text]