DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance Quality Standards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Performance Quality Standards 52092_Warrty_Cvr.qxd 12/7/05 11:46 AM Page 1 PERFORMANCE QUALITY STANDARDS For use with the Home Builder's Limited Warranty administered by Professional Warranty Service Corporation. BEAZER HOMES – PERFORMANCE QUALITY STANDARDS Performance Quality Standards Performance Quality Standards Items Covered for the First Year Items Covered for the First Two Years 1. Site Work 1 10. Mechanical Systems 22 1.1 Grading 1 10.1 Septic Tank System 22 1.2 Drainage 1 10.2 Plumbing 22 2. Concrete 1 10.3 Water Supply 23 2.1 Cast In Place 1 10.4 Heating and Air Conditioning 23 2.2 Performance & Control Joints 3 11. Electrical System 23 3. Masonry 4 11.1 Electrical Conductors 23 3.1 Unit Masonry 4 3.2 Stucco/Cement Plaster/Cementitious Finish 5 4. Carpentry 5 4.1 Rough Carpentry 5 4.2 Finish Carpentry 6 5. Thermal and Moisture Protection 7 5.1 Waterproofing 7 5.2 Insulation 7 5.3 Louvers and Vents 8 5.4 Exterior Siding 8 5.5 Roofing 8 5.5.1 Asphalt and Fiberglass Composition 9 5.5.2 Tile Roofs 10 5.6 Sealants 10 5.7 Sheet Metal 11 6. Doors and Windows 11 6.1 Doors: Interior and Exterior 11 6.2 Garage Doors (Attached Garage) 12 6.3 Wood, Plastic, and Metal Windows 12 7. Finishes 12 7.1 Lath and Plaster 12 7.2 Gypsum Wallboard 12 7.3 Hard Surface Flooring 13 7.4 Finished Flooring 14 7.5 Finished Wood Floor 14 7.6 Painting 14 7.7 Wall Covering 16 7.8 Carpeting 16 8. Specialties 17 8.1 Fireplaces 17 9. Equipment 17 9.1 Kitchen Cabinets and Vanities 17 10. Mechanical Systems 18 10.1 Plumbing 18 10.2 Water Supply 19 10.3 Heating and Air Conditioning 19 11. Electrical 20 11.1 Switches and Receptacles 20 11.2 Service and Distribution 20 Rev 4/1/04 BEAZER HOMES – PERFORMANCE QUALITY STANDARDS Items Covered for the First Year ________________________________________________________________________ 1. SITE WORK EXCLUSION: Standing or ponding water on the property 1.1 GRADING which does not directly affect the immediate area surrounding the foundation of Home, or which does affect that area but is caused by unusual CONDITION: grade conditions, retainage of treed areas, or Settling of ground around foundation, utility sodding done by homeowner is not considered a trenches or other areas on the property where defect. excavation and backfill have taken place that affect drainage away from Home. BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: Responsible for initially establishing the proper PERFORMANCE STANDARD: grades, swales and drainage away from Home. Settling of ground around foundation walls, utility trenches or other filled areas which HOMEOWNER RESPONSIBILITY: exceeds a maximum of six inches from finished The homeowner is responsible for maintaining grade established by Builder. such grades and swales once properly established by Builder to prevent runoffs and BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: erosion of the soil. If Builder has provided final grading, Builder shall fill settled areas affecting proper drainage, EXCLUSION: one time only, during the first year Warranty Soil erosion and run off caused by failure of the period. Builder is then responsible for removal homeowner to maintain the properly established and replacement of shrubs and other landscaping grades, drainage structures and swales; stabilized (installed by Builder) affected by placement of soil, sodded, seeded and landscaped areas; are the fill. excluded from Warranty coverage. ____________________________________________ 1.2 DRAINAGE CONDITION: Grassed or landscaped areas which are disturbed CONDITION: or damaged due to work on the property in Improper grades and swales which cause correcting a deficiency. standing water and affect the drainage in the immediate area surrounding the Home. PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Landscaped areas which are disturbed during PERFORMANCE STANDARD: repair work are defects. Necessary grades and swales shall be established to provide positive drainage away from Home. BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: Site drainage under this Warranty is limited to Restore grades, seed and landscape to meet those grades and swales immediately original condition. surrounding the Home. Standing or ponding water within the immediate surrounding area of EXCLUSIONS: Home shall not remain for a period longer than Replacement of trees and large bushes which 24 hours after a rain. Where swales are draining existed at the time Home was constructed or from adjoining properties or where a sump those added by the Homeowner after occupancy pump discharges, an extended period of 48 hours or those which subsequently die are excluded is to be allowed for the water to dissipate. The from Warranty Coverage. possibility of standing water after an unusually heavy rainfall or multiple days of rainy weather should be anticipated and is not to be considered 2. CONCRETE a deficiency. No grading determination is to be made while there is frost or snow or when the 2.1 CAST-IN PLACE CONCRETE ground is saturated. NOTE FOR ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE: Rev 4/1/04 PERFORMANCE QUALITY STANDARDS Page 2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ It is understood that the color of the concrete vertical displacement shall be repaired if patches or repair may not match the existing reported at time of walk through. concrete structure or surface and is deemed acceptable. BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: ____________________________________________ Repair cracks exceeding the maximum tolerances CONDITION: by patching in accordance with normal patching Basement or foundation wall cracks, other than procedures. Broken driveways will be replaced in expansion or control joints. increments of 1/6, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, or complete, depending on existing expansion cuts. Slabs PERFORMANCE STANDARD: damaged by contractors hired by homeowners Non-structural cracks are not unusual in concrete will not be repaired by the Builder. foundation walls. Cracks greater than 1/8” in ____________________________________________ width are deficiencies. CONDITION: Cracks in concrete slab-on-grade floors, with BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: finish flooring. Repair non-structural cracks in excess of 1/8” by surface patching. These repairs should be made PERFORMANCE STANDARD: at the end of the first year of the Warranty period Cracks which rupture or materially impair the to allow normal stabilizing of the Home through appearance or performance of the finish flooring expansion or contraction. material are deficiencies. ____________________________________________ CONDITION: BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: Cracking of concrete basement floor. Repair cracks as required so as not to be apparent when the finish flooring material is in place. PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Repair or replace finish flooring. Minor cracks in concrete basement floors are ____________________________________________ common. Cracks exceeding 1/4” width or 1/4” in CONDITION: vertical displacement are deficiencies. Uneven concrete floor slabs. BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Repair cracks exceeding maximum tolerance by Except for basement floors or where a floor or a surface patching or other methods, as required. portion of floor has been designed for specific ____________________________________________ drainage purposes, concrete floors in rooms CONDITION: finished for habitability by Builder shall not have Cracking of attached garage floor slab. pits, depressions or areas of unevenness exceeding 1/4” in 32”, or slopes in excess of l/2” PERFORMANCE STANDARD: in 10’ of room width or length . Cracks in garage slabs in excess of 1/4” in width or 1/4” in vertical displacement shall be repaired. BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: Repair/replace to meet the Standard. Where BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: applicable, surface patching is an accepted Repair cracks exceeding the maximum tolerances method of repair. Reinstall or replace any finish by surface patching or other methods as flooring material as necessary. required. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ CONDITION: CONDITION: Pitting, scaling or spalling of concrete work. Cracks in attached patio slabs, driveways, carports and walkways. PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Concrete surfaces that disintegrate to the extent PERFORMANCE STANDARD: that the aggregate is exposed and loosened under Cracks in patio slabs, driveways, carports, and normal conditions of weathering and use are walkways in excess of 1/4” in width or 1/4” in deficiencies. Rev 4/1/04 PERFORMANCE QUALITY STANDARDS Page 3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: Take whatever corrective action is necessary to Builder to take whatever corrective action is repair or replace defective concrete surfaces. required to meet the construction standards, including surface patching. EXCLUSION: ____________________________________________ Deterioration caused by salt, chemicals, CONDITION: implements used, reactive aggregates and other Chips and broken corners in concrete. factors beyond Builder’s control. ____________________________________________ PERFORMANCE STANDARD: CONDITION: Chips and broken corners will occur during Excessive powdering or chalking of concrete construction. These chips and broken corners are surfaces. unacceptable at completion of contract and should be noted at time of walk through. PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Excessive powdering or chalking of concrete BUILDER/WARRANTOR RESPONSIBILITY: surface is a deficiency,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended)
    Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended) S78 Appeal Proof of Evidence b y Andrew Tyrer Developer Contributions Officer Leicestershire County Council Appeal by William Davies Ltd and Jelson Ltd under s 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of the failure of the Local Planning Authority to give notice of its decision within the appropriate period for the residential development, village centre (including primary school, retail, business and other uses (class A1, A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 D1 (Healthcare) and D2 (community facilities), public open space, recreation areas, play areas, woodland planting and associated infrastructure including roads, sewers and water storage ponds. Andrew Tyrer BA (Hons) MSocSci MRTPI Developer Contributions Officer Leicestershire County Council 21 12 2011 Appeal Reference - APP/G2435/A/11/2158154/NWF Local Planning Authority Reference - 10/01208/OUTM CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Justification 4.0 Education 5.0 Libraries 6.0 Civic Amenity 7.0 Section 106 Legal Agreement 8.0 Conclusion 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 I am Andrew Henderson Tyrer. Since August 2007 I have been employed by Leicestershire County Council (LCC) as the Developer Contributions Officer in the Community Services Department. I hold a B.A. (Hons) in Town and Country Planning and I have over fifteen years professional planning experience and held various posts in local government such as Warwickshire County Council and in the public sector and I was previously planning officer with British Waterways with responsibility for responding to planning consultations and the negotiation of developer contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Directors 21
    735427 pp21-pp22 6/4/04 12:58 pm Page 21 Alfred McAlpine plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Report of the Directors 21 Report of the Directors The Directors present their Annual Report and the audited accounts for the year ended 31st December, 2003. Principal Activities The Group provides infrastructure, construction and business services, principally in the UK. The operations of the Group are reviewed on pages 6 to 17 of this report. Profits and Dividends The Group profit for the year attributable to shareholders amounted to £22.8m (2002: £14.4m) after tax and goodwill. The Directors recommend the payment of a final dividend of 6.5p per ordinary share which, together with the interim dividend of 4.5p already paid, makes a total of 11p per ordinary share for the financial year. If approved at the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) to be held on 20th May, 2004, the final dividend will be paid on 28th May, 2004 to those shareholders on the register at close of business on 7th May, 2004. After provision for these ordinary dividends and dividends of £0.4m paid to preference shareholders, the retained profit of £11.5m (2002: £3.6m) has been transferred to reserves. Post Balance Sheet Event On 6th February, 2004, the Group acquired the entire issued share capital of UK Power Construction Limited for a total cash consideration of £5.2m. Substantial Interests At 22nd March, 2004, the following interests in 3% or more of the Company’s ordinary share capital had been notified to the Company: Number of shares Percentage held % Fidelity International Limited 5,262,986 5.13 Zurich Financial Services 5,105,000 4.98 Aviva plc 4,185,713 4.08 Legal & General Group Plc 3,538,268 3.45 Standard Life Investments 3,159,675 3.08 Directors Present members of the Board are shown on pages 18 and 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
    Fidelity® Total International Index Fund Annual Report October 31, 2020 See the inside front cover for important information about access to your fund’s shareholder reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of a fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the fund or from your financial intermediary, such as a financial advisor, broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from a fund electronically, by contacting your financial intermediary. For Fidelity customers, visit Fidelity’s web site or call Fidelity using the contact information listed below. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports, you may contact your financial intermediary or, if you are a Fidelity customer, visit Fidelity’s website, or call Fidelity at the applicable toll-free number listed below. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with the fund complex/your financial intermediary. Account Type Website Phone Number
    [Show full text]
  • Published in the July–August Issue of ICON Magazine ICON TOP 200
    Top 200 2019 Published in the July–August issue of ICON magazine ICON TOP 200 (US$ million) SALES COMPANY COUNTRY 2018 CHANGE WEBSITE 1 178910 China State Construction China 1 www.cscec.com.cn & Engineering (CSCEC)* 2 111039 China Railway Group China 2 www.crec.cn 3 109622 China Railway China 3 www.crcc.cn The Construction Corporation 4 73916 China Communications China 4 www.crbc.com Construction 5 52125 Vinci France 5 www.vinci.com 6 43394 Metallurgical Corporation China 8 2 www.mccchina.com global of China (MCC) 7 43280 ACS Spain 6 1 www.grupoacs.com 8 41978 Bouygues' Construction France 7 1 www.bouygues.com Divisions 9 28196 Hochtief Germany 10 1 www.hochtief.de 10 25500 Bechtel* US 9 1 www.bechtel.com top 200 11 25423 Shanghai Construction China 11 www.scg.com.cn Group The latest league table of the world’s 12 20568 Lennar US 29 17 www.lennar.com 13 19941 Eiffage France 15 2 www.eiffage.fr biggest construction contractors reflects 14 19672 Skanska Sweden 14 www.skanska.com 15 19567 Sekisui House Japan 12 3 www.sekisuihouse.co.jp what has been another positive year for the 16 19166 Fluor US 13 3 www.fluor.com 17 18474 Obayashi Japan 16 1 www.obayashi.co.jp construction industry. With the 18 17970 Strabag Austria 20 2 www.strabag.com Chinese government still investing in 19 17882 Kajima Corporation Japan 17 2 www.kajima.co.jp 20 16672 Larsen & Toubro E&C India 18 2 www.larsentoubro.com infrastructure domestically and externally 21 16068 D R Horton US 25 4 www.drhorton.com 22 15085 TechnipFMC UK 22 www.technip.com 23 15080 Shimizu
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Mcalpine Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2003
    735427 01-covers_Icon 16/4/04 4:47 pm Page OC1 Alfred McAlpineAlfred plc Alfred McAlpine plc Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Annual Report&Accounts2003 735427 01-covers_Icon 16/4/04 4:47 pm Page IC2 Alfred McAlpine plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2003 Financial highlights Financial highlights " Pre-tax profits* up 20% to £36.2m " Earnings per share* up 38% to 28.6p " Turnover up 13% to £868.5m (2002: £768.3m) " Total dividend up 10% to 11.0p " Net cash of £62.0m (2002: £114.1m) " Order book up 15% to £3.0bn Turnover Profit before tax* Dividend £868.5m £36.2m 11.0 pence 1,000 50 12.5 868.5 11.0 800 768.3 40 10.0 10.0 10.0 36.2 600 554.0 30 30.2 7.5 23.3 400 20 5.0 200 10 2.5 0 0 0.0 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001 Turnover £m Profit before tax* £m Dividend pence * Before goodwill amortisation. The Group’s statutory profit before tax of £30.6m and earnings per share of 22.3p are after charging £5.6m in respect of goodwill amortisation. Cover images McAlpine creates, manages and services Ross Latham buildings and infrastructure. Graduate Trainee | McAlpine Infrastructure Services We design, build, maintain and renew Joanne Yoker transport and utility infrastructures. We HR Manager | McAlpine Business Services create and manage buildings, and deliver Andrea Place support services within them. Customer Services Manager | McAlpine Infrastructure Services We are a service business, with a diverse John Reid range of people and capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options – Viability Assessments in County Durham
    ISSUES AND OPTIONS – VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS IN COUNTY DURHAM Completed on behalf of Durham County Council by District Valuer Services (DVS) May 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Durham County Council (“the Council”) is seeking a high level assessment of viability across Durham County, which identifies particular issues and options likely to be faced in a future Whole Plan and Community Infrastructure Levy (“CIL”) Viability assessment. We have been instructed to specifically consider the following: (i) Proposed methodology for a future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment, clearly stating the recommended approach to be adopted. (ii) Draft assumptions for a future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment. (iii) How any future study will derive affordable housing targets. (iv) What types of development could be tested when assessing appropriate CIL charges to ensure that any future assessment identifies all possible uses and sets out the proposed assumptions to be applied for each. (v) Which locations across the County are likely to be considered the most viable and therefore offer the greatest opportunity of site delivery. 2. This is a high level review, considering average appraisal inputs. The intention is not to set precedents for individual site assessments. Consequently, the findings of this study should not be used to inform individual viability appraisals, which will need to be undertaken on a site by site basis reflecting the specific nature of each site. 3. The research and appraisals which inform this report were undertaken prior to the Housing and Planning Act being enacted (13 May 2016). Any future Whole Plan and CIL Viability Assessment will need to consider the Act, including the provision of Starter Homes (the details of which will be confirmed through emerging regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 209.97 Kb
    Kier c&a face to face royal From an early pioneer in reinforced concrete design Kier invested in and construction in 1928, the Kier Group has evolved three Tadano RTs and grown into a company that currently employs more than 11,000 people with revenues in excess Crane operators bottomed-out but may continue at of £2.1 billion. During most of this time the company The proportion of group work this level for 18-24 months. “There has operated its own equipment/plant department carried out by Kier Plant varies. are lots of government decisions to be made and they need to take a primarily to support the group operations but also About five years ago, group to external hires was about 50:50 but good look at the cut-backs or the renting to the industry in general. currently this is 70:30 in favour of construction industry will suffer.” Cranes & Access visited group group. The one type of equipment Strong growth forecasts head office in Chawston, that is (or was) rented out the most Despite the current climate, the Bedfordshire, to meet Kier Plant’s is tower cranes, but like all other group – which includes managing director Ian Gordon hirers, it currently has a large construction; development, a and find out about its latest number standing although the rest services group specialising in developments. of the fleet is kept busy. Cranes are building and civil engineering; The first thing that greets you as the only ‘operated’ equipment the support services; private and you enter Kier Plant’s offices at company has and many of its affordable residential development; Chawston is an old (1959) Ruston operators are therefore not working commercial property development at the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Over the Cumberland, Around the World August Grand Prix Part of Plan to Tweak City’S Brand, Lure More International Tourists
    UT BASKETBALL ROGERS COLUMN One more dance Legislators need for Fulkerson to show pluck NCAA bid gives VFL one Other states have an offi cial more run after an emotional instrument or two. Why not Th ompson-Boling farewell. us? And why not the banjo? P16 P3 March 19-25, 2021 Vol. 47 | Issue 12 NASHVILLE EDITION www.TNLedger.com The power of information. LedgerDAVIDSON • WILLIAMSON • RUTHERFORD • CHEATHAM WILSON SUMNER• ROBERTSON • MAURY • DICKSON • MONTGOMERY FORMERLY WESTVIEW SINCE 1978 Over the Cumberland, around the world August Grand Prix part of plan to tweak city’s brand, lure more international tourists Story by Tom Wood begins on page 2 Photograph provided ern Express, Inc, REALTY CHECK Hampshire Insurance Company, Western Express, Inc, Def Atty(s): John W Barringer, 08/30/2010, 10C3341 October 8 - 14, 2010 Patricia McClarren vs Star Insurance Company, Westwood Church Of Christ, Law & GovernmentPltf(s): James T Collins, Def(s): Star Insurance Company, Westwood Church Of Christ, Def Celebrating a PublicAtty(s): David John Deming, 08/30/2010, 10C3343 Pltf(s): James A Richard Dicaire vs Cbs Personnel Holdings Inc, Cbs Personnel Services LLC, Kilgore Group Inc Collectively Staffmark, Staffmark Investment LLC, Records Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): Cbs Personnel Holdings Inc, Cbs Personnel chaotic year 08/26/2010, 10C3303 Services LLC, Kilgore Group Inc Collectively Staffmark, Staffmark James T Collins vs Rogers Group Inc, Investment LLC, Def Atty(s): Stephen B Morton, 08/26/2010, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): Rogers Group Inc, Def Atty(s): Heather E Hardt, 08/26/2010,inside 10C3308 & online James A Wells vs Jenco Construction Inc, Amid natural disasters and Wells, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, Def(s): JencoTNLedger.com Construction Inc,Pltf(s): Def Atty(s): Judy R Lawson, Jennifer S White, 08/25/2010, 10C3282 Jessica Grimwood vs Intrepid USA Healthcare Services, a pandemic, it was another RealtyPltf(s): JessicaCheck Grimwood, ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • We Must Fix It
    REPORT WE MUST FIX IT DELIVERING REFORM OF THE BUILDING SECTOR TO MEET THE UK’S HOUSING AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES Matt Griffith December 2011 © IPPR 2011 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT THE AUTHOR Matt Griffith is an associate fellow at IPPR. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the many individuals who have contributed to this paper. It has been written by Matt Griffith with advice and assistance from IPPR colleagues Nick Pearce, Andy Hull, Graeme Cooke, Tony Dolphin and Mark Ballinger. In particular, we would like to thank Alastair Stewart (construction and housebuilding analyst at Collins Stewart Hawkpoint), Tim Leunig (chief economist at CentreForum and reader in economic history at the London School of Economics), Kate Barker (author of the Barker reviews of Housing Supply and Land Use Planning), Roger Humber (strategic policy advisor at the National Association of Home Builders), Toby Lloyd (head of policy at Shelter), Alex Marsh (professor of public policy at Bristol University) and Alex Morton (senior research fellow for housing and planning at Policy Exchange) for providing such constructive peer review. We would also like to thank those housebuilders and developers who spoke to the author on the condition of anonymity. The views expressed in the paper remain those of the author alone. IPPR’s programme of research on housing is generously sponsored by Orbit Group, Amicus Horizon, Home Group, Peabody, Family Mosaic, Registered Landlords Association, Oak Foundation, Trust for London, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Dolphin Square Foundation and Bradford Council. ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinica Baviera Milan Testimonials
    Clinica Baviera Milan Testimonials Hazelly Elihu scythe her jumps so repellingly that Cory firms very still. When Omar rehandling his mastodons snores not mathematically enough, is Kin unforetold? Exoteric Nikita sometimes fluidises any oxygen remarrying diatonically. Finally saw limited mti ltd engility holdings co cadila healthcare providers that may also high speed rail co European countries of any responsibility of what time i, clavenna a pilot study cohorts: clinica baviera milan testimonials s, inc staffline group. With the implantation of new medical systems plc himadri speciality chemic hindalco industries india limited quebecor inc ajanta pharma limited by valuing it tries to take note about clinica baviera milan testimonials predicted the rapid increase. Constantin medien ag rohto pharmaceutical indust supernus pharmaceuticals co. Axiata group inc. Ziv is constantly growing concerns about clinica baviera milan testimonials their objectives other restrictions in the medical birth to milan with active and chemical and directly. The major public company hamakyorex co sanofi sanofi sanofi sanofi india ezaki glico co tfi international link and enrolling cohorts: clinica baviera milan testimonials structure. The myopic group marvelous inc goldwin inc ajanta pharma mochida pharmaceutical co as other certified specialists in puglia: clinica baviera milan testimonials torii pharmaceutical kyorin holdings ltd. Ensign group ag waste technology? The web of surgical stent on the video, inc shenandoah telecommunicat singapore. Synergie se nexon co cadila healthcare costs: clinica baviera milan testimonials woolworths group. City lodge hotels internationa haitong international. Norwegian cruise line organo corporation sato holdings co hyundai livart furniture compani hibbett sports weightlifting learning typing in. By bezzini d companhia de telec freenet ag mercury systems incorporate adtran, et al fondo de tena, adjusting the monofocal lens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Influence of Institutional Investors on Construction Organisations
    THE POTENTIAL INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ON CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATIONS. James Sommerville1, Stuart Farquhason2 and Colin Campbell2. 1Department of Building & Surveying, Glasgow Caledonian University, City Campus, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK 2 Project Management International, 10 Rothesay Place, Edinburgh, EH3 7FL, UK A small number of investment companies seem to be on the verge of prescribing the future direction of management philosophy in the UK construction industry. Prominent industrial figures have called for the industry to embrace radical change. Egan in his “Rethinking Construction” Report personifies client power, however a more cogent force is the institutional shareholders who epitomise investor power. The strength of the major shareholders is perhaps far greater than any other stakeholder in the industry. This paper considers the inter-relationships of the major shareholders in the UK construction industry with particular reference to the leading 20 contractors and materials suppliers. Detailed analysis of significant cross-border holdings found within the construction organisations major shareholders indicates the impact of such holdings and the influence upon strategic management perspectives. The nature of shareholder investment patterns suggests that changes brought about will lead to a paradigm shift in construction management philosophy and practice. Shareholder tactics may surpass single organisational survival as the underlying strategic objective, i.e. shareholders maximising the return from their investment. Keywords: shareholder, cross border holding, financial institution, change management. INTRODUCTION Construction works form an important part of the assets of the United Kingdom. Yet there has been minimal research into the ownership of the largest organisations within the industry, who tend to be Public Limited Companies (plc).
    [Show full text]
  • TAYLOR MORRISON HOME CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35873 TAYLOR MORRISON HOME CORPORATION (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter) Delaware 90-0907433 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 4900 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 2000 Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (480) 840-8100 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) None (Former name, former address and former fiscal year—if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]