DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services from Bioenergy Development: a Pan American Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services from Bioenergy Development: a Pan American Experience Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2017 IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Colin Phifer Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2017 Colin Phifer Recommended Citation Phifer, Colin, "IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2017. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/533 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE By Colin C. Phifer A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Forest Science MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Colin C. Phifer This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Forest Science. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Dissertation Co-Advisor: David Flaspohler Dissertation Co-Advisor: Christopher Webster Committee Member: Chelsea Schelly Committee Member: Daniel Gruner School Dean: Terry Sharik Dedicated to Tina and River Phifer, my family (Jasper, you too) Table of Contents Preface............................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... viii Abstract ................................................................................................................................x 1. Project background and research design .....................................................................1 Ecological and social sustainability of bioenergy in the Americas ............................1 Bees and birds: ecosystem services providers and harbingers of change ...................2 Dissertation format and organization ..........................................................................5 Literature cited ............................................................................................................5 2. Bird community responses to afforested eucalyptus plantations in the Argentine pampas ..............................................................................................................................10 Abstract .....................................................................................................................10 Introduction ...............................................................................................................10 Methods ....................................................................................................................12 Site description ...............................................................................................12 Experimental design .......................................................................................13 Field methods .................................................................................................13 Data analysis ...................................................................................................14 Results .......................................................................................................................14 Discussion .................................................................................................................15 Implications of expanding afforestation on avian communities and ecosystem services Edge effects of afforestation on pampas bird communities ...........................17 Management recommendations and future research needs ............................18 Conclusions ....................................................................................................19 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................19 Literature cited ..........................................................................................................19 Tables ........................................................................................................................25 Figures ......................................................................................................................27 Appendix ...................................................................................................................36 3. Impact of land-use change and afforested plantations on native bees in northeastern Argentina ...........................................................................................................................41 Abstract .....................................................................................................................41 iv Introduction ...............................................................................................................41 Materials and methods ..............................................................................................43 Study area description ....................................................................................43 Experimental design .......................................................................................44 Bee sampling ..................................................................................................44 Data analysis ...................................................................................................45 Results .......................................................................................................................45 Discussion .................................................................................................................46 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................48 Literature cited ..........................................................................................................48 Tables ........................................................................................................................53 Figures ......................................................................................................................55 Appendix ...................................................................................................................61 4. Impact of afforested eucalyptus plantations on ecosystem services in Entre Ríos, Argentina ...........................................................................................................................66 Abstract .....................................................................................................................66 Introduction ...............................................................................................................66 Methods ....................................................................................................................68 Site description ...............................................................................................68 Baseline mapping ...........................................................................................69 Community interviews and survey .................................................................69 Scenario development ecosystem service evaluation .....................................70 Results .......................................................................................................................72 Community interviews and survey .................................................................72 Ecosystem service evaluation .........................................................................73 Carbon sequestration.........................................................................73 Pollination service.............................................................................73 Habitat quality...................................................................................73 Discussion .................................................................................................................74 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................76 Literature cited ..........................................................................................................76 Tables ........................................................................................................................82 Figures ......................................................................................................................85 Appendix ...................................................................................................................92 v 5. Impacts of stand age on bee and wasp diversity in aspen forests in northeastern Wisconsin, USA .................................................................................................................98 Abstract .....................................................................................................................98 Introduction ...............................................................................................................98 Methods ..................................................................................................................100
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Structure of Bird and Mammal Communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: Response to Agricultural Practices and Landscape Alterations
    Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Julieta Decarre March 2015 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London 2 Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Supervised by Dr. Chris Carbone Dr. Cristina Banks-Leite Dr. Marcus Rowcliffe Imperial College London Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London 3 Declaration of Originality I herewith certify that the work presented in this thesis is my own and all else is referenced appropriately. I have used the first-person plural in recognition of my supervisors’ contribution. People who provided less formal advice are named in the acknowledgments. Julieta Decarre 4 Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work 5 “ …and we wandered for about four hours across the dense forest…Along the path I could see several footprints of wild animals, peccaries, giant anteaters, lions, and the footprint of a tiger, that is the first one I saw.” - Emilio Budin, 19061 I dedicate this thesis To my mother and my father to Virginia, Juan Martin and Alejandro, for being there through space and time 1 Book: “Viajes de Emilio Budin: La Expedición al Chaco, 1906-1907”.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Argentina (Custom Tour) 13 – 24 November, 2015 Tour Leader: Andrés Vásquez Co-Guided by Sam Woods
    Northwest Argentina (custom tour) 13 – 24 November, 2015 Tour leader: Andrés Vásquez Co-guided by Sam Woods Trip Report by Andrés Vásquez; most photos by Sam Woods, a few by Andrés V. Elegant Crested-Tinamou at Los Cardones NP near Cachi; photo by Sam Woods Introduction: Northwest Argentina is an incredible place and a wonderful birding destination. It is one of those locations you feel like you are crossing through Wonderland when you drive along some of the most beautiful landscapes in South America adorned by dramatic rock formations and deep-blue lakes. So you want to stop every few kilometers to take pictures and when you look at those shots in your camera you know it will never capture the incredible landscape and the breathtaking feeling that you had during that moment. Then you realize it will be impossible to explain to your relatives once at home how sensational the trip was, so you breathe deeply and just enjoy the moment without caring about any other thing in life. This trip combines a large amount of quite contrasting environments and ecosystems, from the lush humid Yungas cloud forest to dry high Altiplano and Puna, stopping at various lakes and wetlands on various altitudes and ending on the drier upper Chaco forest. Tropical Birding Tours Northwest Argentina, Nov.2015 p.1 Sam recording memories near Tres Cruces, Jujuy; photo by Andrés V. All this is combined with some very special birds, several endemic to Argentina and many restricted to the high Andes of central South America. Highlights for this trip included Red-throated
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generic Distinction of Pied Woodpeckers
    THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS M. RALPH BROWNING, 170 JacksonCreek Drive, Jacksonville,Oregon 97530 ABSTRACT: The ten speciesof New World four-toedwoodpeckers (scalaris, nuttallii, pubescens, villosus, stricklandi, arizonae, borealis, albolarvatus, lignarius,and m ixtusand the two borealthree-toed species (arcticus and tridactylus), currentlycombined in the genusPicoides, differ, in additionto the numberof toes,in modificationsof the skull,ribs, the belly of the pubo-ischio-femoralismuscle, head plumage,and behavior. I recommendthat the genericname Dryobates be reinstituted for the New World four-toedwoodpeckers. There are three generalmorphological groups of pied woodpeckers,a groupof nine four-toedspecies of the New World, a groupof 22 four-toed speciesof the Old World, and a groupof two three-toedspecies straddling bothregions. ! referto thesegroups of piedwoodpeckers beyond as the New World,Old World,and three-toedgroups. The three-toedspecies have long beenin the genusPicoides Lac•p•de, 1799, but the four-toedgroups have been combinedat the genericlevel in differentways. All four-toedpied woodpeckerswere long includedin the genusDryobates Boie, 1826, later changed to Dendrocopos Koch, 1816 an earlier name (Voous 1947, A.O.U. 1947, Peters 1948). Despite the differencein number of toes, Dendrocoposwas combined with Picoidesbecause of generalsimilarities in anatomy (Delacour 1951, Short 1971a), plumage and behavior (Short 1974a), and vocalizations(Winkler and Short 1978). The A.O.U (1976) followedthis mergerof the genera.On the basisof skeletalcharacters Rea (1983) was skepticalof the merger,but he did not providedetails. On the otherhand, Ouellet(1977), concludingthat the two generadiffer in external morphologyand some behaviors and vocalizations, separated the Old World four-toedwoodpeckers in Dendrocoposand three-toedand New World four-toedwoodpeckers in Picoides.The A.O.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina-Carbon-And-Forests.Pdf
    22383 Public Disclosure Authorized ARGENTINA: Carbon and Forests Prepared by Roger A. Sedjo and Eduardo Ley Resourcesfor the Future Public Disclosure Authorized 1616 P Street NW Washington. D. C. December 4, 1995 Public Disclosure Authorized Report Prepared for the Global Environmental Facility of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized FILE COPY ARGENTINA: Carbon and Forests' Roger A. Sedjo and Eduardo Ley Resources for the Future December 4, 1995 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. GLO13AL W ARM ING AND CARBO N ......................................................................................... 1 1 THE CuRRENT SrruATIoN.................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 TYPESOF H umAN REspoNsEs............................................................................................................ 6 13 TooLs To MTGATE THE BUILD-UP OF ATMOSPHERIc CARBON......................................................... 6 2. FOREST MANAGEMENT: MITIGATION ACTIVITIES AND SINK ENHANCEMENT.... 8 2.1 How M ucH FOREST?......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 FoREST M EGATION POUCIES............................................................................................................ 9 3. ARGENTINA: CARBON AND FORESTS ...................................................................... 6.........16 3.1 FoREsTs Iq ARGENTNA ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brood Parasitism in a Host Generalist, the Shiny Cowbird: I
    BROOD PARASITISM IN A HOST GENERALIST, THE SHINY COWBIRD: I. THE QUALITY OF DIFFERENT SPECIES AS HOSTS PAUL MASON 1 Departmentof Zoology,University of Texas,Austin, Texas 78712 USA ASSTRACT.--TheShiny Cowbird (Molothrusbonariensis) of South America, Panama, and the West Indies is an obligate brood parasiteknown to have used 176 speciesof birds as hosts. This study documentswide variability in the quality of real and potential hostsin terms of responseto eggs, nestling diet, and nest survivorship. The eggs of the parasiteare either spotted or immaculate in eastern Argentina and neighboring parts of Uruguay and Brazil. Most speciesaccept both morphs of cowbird eggs,two reject both morphs, and one (Chalk- browed Mockingbird, Mimus saturninus)rejects immaculate eggs but acceptsspotted ones. No species,via its rejection behavior, protectsthe Shiny Cowbird from competition with a potentialcompetitor, the sympatricScreaming Cowbird (M. rufoaxillaris).Cross-fostering ex- periments and natural-history observationsindicate that nestling cowbirds require a diet composedof animal protein. Becausemost passerinesprovide their nestlingswith suchfood, host selectionis little restricted by diet. Species-specificnest survivorship, adjustedto ap- propriatevalues of Shiny Cowbird life-history variables,varied by over an order of mag- nitude. Shiny Cowbirds peck host eggs.This density-dependentsource of mortality lowers the survivorshipof nestsof preferred hostsand createsnatural selectionfor greater gener- alization. Host quality is sensitive to the natural-history attributes of each host speciesand to the behavior of cowbirds at nests.Received 4 June1984, accepted26 June1985. VARIATIONin resourcequality can have great parasitized176 species(Friedmann et al. 1977). ecologicaland evolutionary consequences.Ob- The Shiny Cowbird is sympatric with a poten- ligate brood parasites never build nests but tial competitor, the ScreamingCowbird (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Guia Para Observação Das Aves Do Parque Nacional De Brasília
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234145690 Guia para observação das aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília Book · January 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 629 4 authors, including: Mieko Kanegae Fernando Lima Favaro Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Bi… 7 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 69 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Fernando Lima Favaro on 28 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Brasília - 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA Aílton C. de Oliveira Mieko Ferreira Kanegae Marina Faria do Amaral Fernando de Lima Favaro Fotografia de Aves Marcelo Pontes Monteiro Nélio dos Santos Paulo André Lima Borges Brasília, 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO APRESENTAÇÃO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA É com grande satisfação que apresento o Guia para Observação REPÚblica FEDERATiva DO BRASIL das Aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília, o qual representa um importante instrumento auxiliar para os observadores de aves que frequentam ou que Presidente frequentarão o Parque, para fins de lazer (birdwatching), pesquisas científicas, Dilma Roussef treinamentos ou em atividades de educação ambiental. Este é mais um resultado do trabalho do Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Vice-Presidente Conservação de Aves Silvestres - CEMAVE, unidade descentralizada do Instituto Michel Temer Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) e vinculada à Diretoria de Conservação da Biodiversidade. O Centro tem como missão Ministério do Meio Ambiente - MMA subsidiar a conservação das aves brasileiras e dos ambientes dos quais elas Izabella Mônica Vieira Teixeira dependem.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae: Xylocopini) De La Región Neotropical Biota Colombiana, Vol
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Ospina, Mónica Abejas Carpinteras (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae: Xylocopini) de la Región Neotropical Biota Colombiana, vol. 1, núm. 3, diciembre, 2000, pp. 239-252 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49110307 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto OspinaBiota Colombiana 1 (3) 239 - 252, 2000 Carpenter Bees of the Neotropic - 239 Abejas Carpinteras (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae: Xylocopini) de la Región Neotropical Mónica Ospina Fundación Nova Hylaea, Apartado Aéreo 59415 Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopa, Abejas Carpinteras, Neotrópico, Lista de Especies Los himenópteros con aguijón conforman el grupo detectable. Son abejas polilécticas, es decir, visitan gran monofilético de los Aculeata o Vespomorpha, que se divide variedad de plantas, algunas de importancia económica en tres superfamilias, una de las cuales comprende las avis- como el maracuyá; sus provisiones son generalmente una pas esfécidas y las abejas (Apoidea). Dentro de las abejas, mezcla firme y seca de polen (Fernández & Nates 1985, Michener (2000) reconoce varias familias, siendo Apidae la Michener et al. 1994, Fernández 1995, Michener 2000). Exis- más grande en número de especies y la más ampliamente te dentro de algunas especies del género una tendencia distribuida.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainforest & Savanna ‐ Alta Floresta
    Field Guides Tour Report RAINFOREST & SAVANNA ‐ ALTA FLORESTA & THE PANTANAL, BRAZIL 2015 Jun 13, 2015 to Jun 29, 2015 Marcelo Padua For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. A pair of Scarlet Macaws flies by our group at Cristalino Jungle Lodge. Photo by guide Marcelo Padua. As a tour guide, I am often asked if I don’t get tired of doing the same tours over and over again; I always answer "no", as each tour is completely different from the previous one. This year’s Alta Floresta and Pantanal tour is proof that I’m not lying, as it was like no tour I had ever led before. We started things at Chapada dos Guimaraes, a well-known birding destination just a few kilometers from Cuiaba. Though there were plenty of the usual suspects that we hope to find at this site, such as White-banded and White-rumped tanagers, Plain-crested Elaenia, Plumbeous Seedeater and Pale- breasted Spinetail, we also came across a variety of birds that are rarely seen, including Crowned Eagle, Checkered Woodpecker and the endangered Yellow-faced Parrot, so we were off to an auspicious start. Cristalino was next, and forest birding is in an entirely different ball game. The dark understory makes it even harder to see birds that are shy by nature, and the canopy is so far up that even the most colorful birds sometimes look like dark spots in the sky. Fortunately, the two observation towers at Cristalino leveled the playing field for us, and with fruiting trees close to both of them, we struck gold, as a myriad of tanagers, toucans, toucanets, aracaris, cotingas and parrots came in for close inspection by our group.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/9/9 2 May
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/9/9 2 May 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Ninth meeting Bonn, 19–30 May 2008 Item 2.2 of the provisional agenda* REPORT OF THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1. In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Conference of the Parties and the Council of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) contained in the annex to decision III/8, annex, the GEF Council prepares and submits a report for each ordinary meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Section 3 of the MOU provides a list of specific information, detailed information as well as other information to be included in the report. 2. In addition, in decision VIII/18, paragraph 2, the Conference of the Parties requested the Global Environment Facility, as the institutional structure operating the financial mechanism of the Convention, to include in its regular report to the Conference of the Parties information on: (a) The initial application of the Resource Allocation Framework to resources allocated in the fourth replenishment of the Global Environment Facility that is operational from July 2006, focusing on the biodiversity focal area; (b) How the Resource Allocation Framework is likely to affect funding available to developing countries and countries with economies in transition for the implementation of their commitments under the Convention. 3. In light of the above, the Executive Secretary is circulating herewith the report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties at its ninth meeting. * UNEP/CBD/COP/9/1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Natural
    ISSN 0326-1778 Tercera Serie Volumen 3 (1) 2013 ISSN 1853-6581 HISTORIA NATURAL BUE NOS AIRES, ARGENTINA HISTORIA NATURAL Tercera Serie Volumen 3 (1) 2013 Historia Natural es una publicación periódica, semestral, especializada, dedicada a las ciencias naturales, editada por la Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara y el Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas de la Universidad Maimónides. Fundador: Julio R. Contreras. Editores: Sergio Bogan y Federico Agnolin. Copyright: Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara. Diseño: Mariano Masariche. Comité Asesor: Dr. José F. Bonaparte (Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales “Carlos Ameghino”, Argentina). Dr. Michael A. Mares (Sam Noble Museum, University of Oklahoma, Estados Unidos). Dr. Horacio H. Camacho (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Argentina). Dr. Ricardo Bastida (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina). Dr. Hugo L. López (Museo de La Plata, Argentina). Dr. Jorge V. Crisci (Museo de La Plata, Argentina). Dr. Álvaro Mones (Franzensbadstr, Augsburg, Alemania). Dr. Adrià Casinos (Universidad de Barcelona, España). Dr. Julio R. Contreras (Universidad Nacional de Pilar, Paraguay). Comité Editor: Dra. Ana M. Faggi (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Argentina). Dr. David A. Flores (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Argentina). Dr. Luis Cappozzo (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Argentina).- Dr. Jorge D. Williams (Museo de La Plata, Argentina). Dr. Carlos Darrieu (Museo de La Plata, Argentina). Dr. Marcos Mirande (Instituto Miguel Lillo, Argentina). Dr. Gustavo Darrigran (Museo de La Plata, Argentina). Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas Universidad Maimónides - Hidalgo 775 P. 7º Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires - República Argentina (54) 11-4905-1100 int.
    [Show full text]