The Generic Distinction of Pied Woodpeckers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Generic Distinction of Pied Woodpeckers THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS M. RALPH BROWNING, 170 JacksonCreek Drive, Jacksonville,Oregon 97530 ABSTRACT: The ten speciesof New World four-toedwoodpeckers (scalaris, nuttallii, pubescens, villosus, stricklandi, arizonae, borealis, albolarvatus, lignarius,and m ixtusand the two borealthree-toed species (arcticus and tridactylus), currentlycombined in the genusPicoides, differ, in additionto the numberof toes,in modificationsof the skull,ribs, the belly of the pubo-ischio-femoralismuscle, head plumage,and behavior. I recommendthat the genericname Dryobates be reinstituted for the New World four-toedwoodpeckers. There are three generalmorphological groups of pied woodpeckers,a groupof nine four-toedspecies of the New World, a groupof 22 four-toed speciesof the Old World, and a groupof two three-toedspecies straddling bothregions. ! referto thesegroups of piedwoodpeckers beyond as the New World,Old World,and three-toedgroups. The three-toedspecies have long beenin the genusPicoides Lac•p•de, 1799, but the four-toedgroups have been combinedat the genericlevel in differentways. All four-toedpied woodpeckerswere long includedin the genusDryobates Boie, 1826, later changed to Dendrocopos Koch, 1816 an earlier name (Voous 1947, A.O.U. 1947, Peters 1948). Despite the differencein number of toes, Dendrocoposwas combined with Picoidesbecause of generalsimilarities in anatomy (Delacour 1951, Short 1971a), plumage and behavior (Short 1974a), and vocalizations(Winkler and Short 1978). The A.O.U (1976) followedthis mergerof the genera.On the basisof skeletalcharacters Rea (1983) was skepticalof the merger,but he did not providedetails. On the otherhand, Ouellet(1977), concludingthat the two generadiffer in external morphologyand some behaviors and vocalizations, separated the Old World four-toedwoodpeckers in Dendrocoposand three-toedand New World four-toedwoodpeckers in Picoides.The A.O.U. (1987, 1998), Sibleyand Monroe (1990), and most Europeanauthors (e.g., Hogstad 1978, Cramp 1985, Aulenand Lundberg1991) followedOuellet (1977). More recently, analysisof DNA sequencesof the genesfor cytochromeoxidase I, cyto- chromeb (Weibeland Moore 2002a), and l•-fibrinogenintron 7 (Weibeland Moore 2002b) suggestthat Picoides(sensu Short 1982) consistsof several groupsof species. In discussingthe characterson which he based his classificationof woodpeckers,Short (1982) commentedthat anatomicalstudies are unreli- able becauseof the lack of analysesof variousstructures' functions. Burr (1930), however,had founda positivecorrelation between certain modifica- tionsin the skulland habitsof woodpeckers.Spring (1965) concludedthat the lossof the halluxand a reducedangle of cranialkinesis are probably modificationsfor a woodpecker'speck to deliver a blow of maximum impact. Kirby (1980) concludedthat woodpeckerswith wider ribs are adaptedto more frequentand harderpecking than specieswith narrow ribs and that the pattern of increasingrib width follows that of increasing specializationin the skullin speciescharacterized by Burt (1930). WesternBirds 34:97-107, 2003 97 THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS Burt (1930) discussedas a modificationin the skullof woodpeckersthe meetingof the frontal bone (foreheadof the cranium)and the superior processesof the premaxillary(base of the maxilla),which forms a so-called cranio-facialangle. He qualitativelyranked the three-toedpied woodpeckers as havinga more acuteangle than the four-toedNew World species.The frontalbones of both groups,and of the distinct(Zusi and Marshall1970) genus$phyrapicu$, the sapsuckers,fold towardthe cranium(Burt 1930). Another modification in the skull is the relative distance between the lateralparts of the frontalbone that bulgeanteriorly and the anteriorcenter of the bone (Figure1). Here I summarizethis distanceand other measure- ments of the skull, with other anatomicaland behavioralinformation, to determinedifferences and similaritiesamong pied woodpeckers. METHODS I examinedskeletons including skulls and an associatedfemur of 17 of the 22 speciesof Old World four-toedpied woodpeckers,all speciesof New World four-toedpied woodpeckersexcept the CheckeredWoodpecker (Pi½oid½smixtus) of South America, both speciesof three-toed pied Figure 1. Diagrammaticdorsal view of a woodpeckerskull showing distances mea- sured.A, distancefrom the medialbase of the mostposterior part of the occiputto the anteriorlateral corners of the frontalbone; B, distance,measured medially, from the mostposterior part of the occiputto centerof the anteriormargin of the frontalbone. The craniofacialdistance formula, normalized for the sizeof the bird,is expressedby (A - B)/femur length(100).Two measurementsof widthsof the skull:W, maximum width;O, width at the orbits. 98 THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS woodpeckers(the Three-toed, P. tridactylus, and the Black-backed,P. arcticus),all speciesof Sphyrapicus,and three species of the Africangenus Dendropicos(sensu Short 1982) (Table 1). The last genuswas included becausePicoides and Dendropicos are probably closelyrelated (Short 1971b). On each skullI measuredthe distancealong the midlinebetween the mostanterior point of the frontalbone in itscenter and the mostanterior (fartheranterior) point of the frontalbone at its lateralcorners. I did thisby subtractingthe lengthof the cranium,measured medially from the baseof the occiputto the centerof the mostanterior part of the frontalbone (B in Figure1), fromthe distancefrom the medialbase of the occiputto the lateral cornersof the mostanterior part of the frontalbone (A in Figure1). To avoid possiblebias caused by the species'varying sizes (Kirby 1980, Risingand Somers1989), I dividedA - B by femurlength. Thus, the formula(A - B)/ femur(100)gives a valuethat, for brevity,I referto as facialdistance. The sexeswere combinedbecause the charactersaddressed in the studyare not sexuallydimorphic. I also comparedmaximum skull width (W in Figure 1) anddorsal skull width between the orbits(O in Figure1), dividedby lengthof femur.SYSTAT (Wilkonson 1989) wasused for the statisticalanalyses. For the speciesomitted from this analysis,no skeletonincluding an intactskull andat leastone femurwas available from the numerousmuseums surveyed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In the three-toedpied woodpeckers the facialdistance is greaterthan in the four-toedspecies. The averagefacial distance for boththree-toed species is at least2.5 greaterthan in any four-toedspecies, and individualvariation yieldsonly minimal overlap with onlyone of the four-toedspecies, the Old WorldLesser Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) (Tables1 and 2). The skullshapes of the two groupsare distinctvisually; a skullis readily identifiableas that of a three-toedor a four-toedwoodpecker without the facialdistance being measured (Figure 2). Facialdistances of New Worldand Old Worldfour-toed woodpeckers (Table 2), sapsuckers(mean 5.18, range 2.89-7.50, n = 8) and the availablespecies of Dendropicos(mean 3.63, range1.32-6.77, n = 4) are similarto one anotherand do not overlapthose of the three-toedwoodpeckers. The width of the skull(Figure 1) in all pied woodpeckersis similar.The widthof the skullof speciesof Dendropicos(0.84 to 0.95) andSphyrapicus (Figure3) is similarin both generaand narrowerthan in the pied species. The widthof the skullat the orbits(Figure 1) is similarin the four-toedpied woodpeckers.This variable is greater in the three-toed speciesand in Sphyrapicus,whereas in Dendropicosit is narrower than in the other woodpeckersmeasured. Principal-componentsanalysis, based on facial distance,widths, and lengthsof the skull(Figure 1) of the pied woodpeckers,revealed extensive overlapin canonicalfactors 1 and 2 of the Old and New Worldfour-toed species(Figure 4). The three-toedpied woodpeckersand Sphyrapicus, however, differ from each other, and both differ from four-toed pied woodpeckers(Figure 4). 99 THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS Table 1 Cranio-facial Distance of Adult Three- and Four-toed Pied Woodpeckersand Some RelatedSpecies Species n Range Mean+ SD• OldWorld four-toed woodpeckers (Dendrocopos) Sulawesi(temmincki) 1 3.30 Philippine(maculatus) 3 3.16-5.56 4.07 Brown-capped(nanus) 1 4.86 Pygmy(kizuki) 1 5.33 Gray-capped(½anicapillus) 2 3.82-4.69 4.23 LesserSpotted (minor) 5 7.60-9.43 8.50 Fulvous-breasted(macei) 1 3.45 Stripe•breasted(atratus) 2 1.40-2.90 2.10 Yellow-crowned(mahrattensis) 1 7.40 Darjeeling(darjellensis) 1 4.16 Rufous-bellied(hyperythrus) 1 5.80 MiddleSpotted (medius) 3 3.90-4.90 4.40 White-backed(leu½otos) 1 4.09 Himalayan(himalayensis) 1 4.16 Sind(assimilis) 1 5.82 Syrian(syriacus) 2 5.20-6.80 6.00 GreatSpotted (major) 5 3.89-5.33 4.80 New Worldfour-toed species (Dryobates) Striped(lignarius) 1 6.34 Ladder-backed(scalaris) 23 2.23-5.40 4.20 + 1.20 Nuttall's(nuttallii) 6 2.71-5.59 4.70 Downy(pubescens) 22 2.98-7.59 5.10 + 1.30 Red-cockaded(borealis) 10 3.41-6.53 4.60 + 1.81 Strickland's(stricklandi) b 9 2.55-6.01 4.90 Hairy (villosus) 24 2.25-7.05 5.30 + 1.20 White-headed(albolarvatus) 5 4.61-8.48 7.30 Three-toedspecies (Pi½oides) Three-toed(tridactylus) 10 8.60-13.83 11.10 + 1.58 Black-backed(arcticus) 8 10.08-13.25 11.14 Sapsuckers($phyrapicus) Yellow-bellied(varius) 3 7.32-2.89 4.45 Red-naped(nuchalis) 2 7.07-7.50 7.29 Red-breasted(tuber) 1 3.77 Williamson's(thyroideus) 2 3.38-6.37 4.88 Africanpied woodpeckers (Dendropi½os) Golden-crowned(xantholophus) 1 4.00 Bearded(namaquus) 1 1.32 Cardinal(fuscescens) 1 6.77 Gray (goertae) 1 2.42 aStandarddeviation (SD) calculatedfor n > 9. blncludesArizona Woodpecker
Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Structure of Bird and Mammal Communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: Response to Agricultural Practices and Landscape Alterations
    Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Julieta Decarre March 2015 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London 2 Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Supervised by Dr. Chris Carbone Dr. Cristina Banks-Leite Dr. Marcus Rowcliffe Imperial College London Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London 3 Declaration of Originality I herewith certify that the work presented in this thesis is my own and all else is referenced appropriately. I have used the first-person plural in recognition of my supervisors’ contribution. People who provided less formal advice are named in the acknowledgments. Julieta Decarre 4 Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work 5 “ …and we wandered for about four hours across the dense forest…Along the path I could see several footprints of wild animals, peccaries, giant anteaters, lions, and the footprint of a tiger, that is the first one I saw.” - Emilio Budin, 19061 I dedicate this thesis To my mother and my father to Virginia, Juan Martin and Alejandro, for being there through space and time 1 Book: “Viajes de Emilio Budin: La Expedición al Chaco, 1906-1907”.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision
    Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Joint Venture Landbird Committee Members: Kelly VanBeek, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds), Co-chair Chris Tonra, The Ohio State University, Co-chair Mohammed Al-Saffar, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Dave Ewert, American Bird Conservancy Erin Gnass Giese, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Allisyn-Marie Gillet, Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources Shawn Graff, American Bird Conservancy Jim Herkert, Illinois Audubon Sarah Kendrick, Missouri Dept. of Conservation Mark Nelson, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Katie O’Brien, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Wayne Thogmartin, U.S. Geological Survey Mike Ward, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Tom Will, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Recommended citation: Soulliere, G. J., M. A. Al-Saffar, K. R. VanBeek, C. M. Tonra, M. D. Nelson, D. N. Ewert, T. Will, W. E. Thogmartin, K. E. O’Brien, S. W. Kendrick, A. M. Gillet, J. R. Herkert, E. E. Gnass Giese, M. P. Ward, and S. Graff. 2020. Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA. Cover photo: Whip-poor-will, by Ian Sousa-Cole. TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATEGY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Hairy Woodpecker Dryobates Villosus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata the Hairy Woodpecker Averages Nine and One-Half Class: Aves Inches in Length
    hairy woodpecker Dryobates villosus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The hairy woodpecker averages nine and one-half Class: Aves inches in length. The feathers on its back, outer tail Order: Piciformes feathers, belly, stripes on its head and spots on its wings are white. The head, wing and tail feathers Family: Picidae are black. The male has a small, red patch on the ILLINOIS STATUS back of the head. Unlike the similar downy woodpecker, the hairy woodpecker has a large bill. common, native BEHAVIORS The hairy woodpecker is a common, permanent resident statewide. Nesting takes place from March through June. The nest cavity is dug five to 30 feet above the ground in a dead or live tree. Both sexes excavate the hole over a one- to three-week period. The female deposits three to six white eggs on a nest of wood chips. The male and female take turns incubating the eggs during the day, with only the male incubating at night for the duration of the 11- to 12-day incubation period. One brood is raised per year. The hairy woodpecker lives in woodlands, wooded areas in towns, swamps, orchards and city parks. Its call is a loud “peek.” This woodpecker eats insects, seeds and berries. adult at suet food ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • Picoides Arcticus Swainson Black-Backedblack-Backed Woodpecker Woodpecker, Page 1
    Picoides arcticus Swainson black-backedblack-backed woodpecker woodpecker, Page 1 State Distribution Best Survey Period Photo courtesy Mike Danzenbaker Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: Special Concern Counties in the Upper Peninsula. Breeding is probable in Houghton, Keweenaw, Luce and Ontonagon Counties Global and state ranks: G5/S2 (Evers 1991, Michigan Natural Features Inventory 2002). Winter records of wandering individuals are Family: Picadae (woodpeckerzs) known south to Kalamazoo and Wayne counties (Wood 1951), although most southern Lower Peninsula obser- Total range: Black-backed woodpeckers are year- vations are prior to the mid 1900s (Zimmerman and Van round residents within boreal and montane forests Tyne 1959). Michigan is at the southern edge of this across northern North America. They breed from species range. central Alaska and northern Canada to montane areas of California and New England. Although the black- Recognition: This relatively large woodpecker has a backed woodpecker does not migrate south in winter, wingspan of 16 inches and length of 9.5 inches. It is individuals may move infrequently to areas south of the larger than the hairy woodpecker. Black-backed wood- regular breeding range in response to local insect peckers appear large-headed and short-tailed. Adults outbreaks. Movements can vary from a few wandering are all black with a bluish gloss above and a dis- individuals to irruptions involving many birds. Winter tinct white malar stripe. The belly and breast are records have occurred as far south as southern white but the sides and flanks are barred with Saskatchewan, Iowa, central Illinois, northern Indiana, black.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: a Taste of Africa, November 2017
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 A Tropical Birding “Chilled” SET DEPARTURE tour The Gambia A Taste of Africa Just Six Hours Away From The UK November 2017 TOUR LEADERS: Alan Davies and Iain Campbell Report by Alan Davies Photos by Iain Campbell Egyptian Plover. The main target for most people on the tour www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 Red-throated Bee-eaters We arrived in the capital of The Gambia, Banjul, early evening just as the light was fading. Our flight in from the UK was delayed so no time for any real birding on this first day of our “Chilled Birding Tour”. Our local guide Tijan and our ground crew met us at the airport. We piled into Tijan’s well used minibus as Little Swifts and Yellow-billed Kites flew above us. A short drive took us to our lovely small boutique hotel complete with pool and lovely private gardens, we were going to enjoy staying here. Having settled in we all met up for a pre-dinner drink in the warmth of an African evening. The food was delicious, and we chatted excitedly about the birds that lay ahead on this nine- day trip to The Gambia, the first time in West Africa for all our guests. At first light we were exploring the gardens of the hotel and enjoying the warmth after leaving the chilly UK behind. Both Red-eyed and Laughing Doves were easy to see and a flash of colour announced the arrival of our first Beautiful Sunbird, this tiny gem certainly lived up to its name! A bird flew in landing in a fig tree and again our jaws dropped, a Yellow-crowned Gonolek what a beauty! Shocking red below, black above with a daffodil yellow crown, we were loving Gambian birds already.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainforest & Savanna ‐ Alta Floresta
    Field Guides Tour Report RAINFOREST & SAVANNA ‐ ALTA FLORESTA & THE PANTANAL, BRAZIL 2015 Jun 13, 2015 to Jun 29, 2015 Marcelo Padua For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. A pair of Scarlet Macaws flies by our group at Cristalino Jungle Lodge. Photo by guide Marcelo Padua. As a tour guide, I am often asked if I don’t get tired of doing the same tours over and over again; I always answer "no", as each tour is completely different from the previous one. This year’s Alta Floresta and Pantanal tour is proof that I’m not lying, as it was like no tour I had ever led before. We started things at Chapada dos Guimaraes, a well-known birding destination just a few kilometers from Cuiaba. Though there were plenty of the usual suspects that we hope to find at this site, such as White-banded and White-rumped tanagers, Plain-crested Elaenia, Plumbeous Seedeater and Pale- breasted Spinetail, we also came across a variety of birds that are rarely seen, including Crowned Eagle, Checkered Woodpecker and the endangered Yellow-faced Parrot, so we were off to an auspicious start. Cristalino was next, and forest birding is in an entirely different ball game. The dark understory makes it even harder to see birds that are shy by nature, and the canopy is so far up that even the most colorful birds sometimes look like dark spots in the sky. Fortunately, the two observation towers at Cristalino leveled the playing field for us, and with fruiting trees close to both of them, we struck gold, as a myriad of tanagers, toucans, toucanets, aracaris, cotingas and parrots came in for close inspection by our group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woodcock Volume 3 Issue 3
    The Woodcock Volume 3 issue 3 Welcome to ABC The Antioch Bird Club Team extends a hearty welcome to previous and new readers to this edition of The Woodcock! This ​ ​ is your one stop to find out all things Antioch Bird Club (ABC). Each month within its pages you will find ABC news and updates, previous event highlights, upcoming event descriptions, and new ways to get involved. Sometimes there will be special editions of this newsletter as well, such as the Global Big Year edition coming soon! Have a creative idea for an event, trip, or activity? We are always accepting suggestions just email an ABC team member or stop by our next meeting (4:15pm February 28th; Rm 231). We are excited to learn about our club members’ diverse passions, and we look forward to finding new ways to connect to each other through birds. As a supporter of ABC, you have made a statement for bird conservation locally and globally; thank you! ABC members leading a guided community bird walk at Horatio Colony Preserve in 2018. ABC News Meet the ABC Team ABC welcomes back Steven Lamonde and Rachel Yurchisin as ABC Coordinators for the spring semester. Steven is a third-year Con Bio student studying Golden-winged Warblers in Vermont, and Rachel is a second-year Con Bio student working on Liz Willey’s turtle conservation project. ABC brought on two new assistants this semester, Kim Snyder and Jessica Poulin! Kim is a first-year Con Bio student and has already brainstormed some exciting new ideas for ABC projects and events.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Evidence for Phylogenetic Relationships Among Woodpeckers
    ANATOMICAL EVIDENCE FOR PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WOODPECKERS WILLIAM R. GOODGE ALT•tOUCr•the functionalanatomy of woodpeckershas long been a subjectof interest,their internal anatomyhas not been usedextensively for determiningprobable phylogeneticrelationships within the family. In part this is probablydue to the reluctanceto use highly adaptivefea- tures in phylogeneticstudies becauseof the likelihood of convergent evolution. Bock (1967) and othershave pointedout that adaptivehess in itself doesnot rule out taxonomicusefulness, and that the highly adaptivefeatures will probablybe the oneshaving conspicuous anatomical modifications,and Bock emphasizesthe need for detailedstudies of func- tion beforeusing featuresin studiesof phylogeny.Although valuable, functionalconclusions are often basedon inferencesnot backed up by experimentaldata. As any similaritybetween species is possiblydue to functionalconvergence, I believewhat is neededmost is detailedstudy of a numberof featuresin order to distinguishbetween similarities re- sultingfrom convergenceand thosebased on phylogenticrelationship. Simplestructures are not necessarilymore primitive and morphological trendsare reversible,as Mayr (1955) has pointedout. Individual varia- tion may occur and various investigatorsmay interpret structuresdif- ferently. Despite these limitations,speculation concerning phylogeny will continuein the future,and I believethat it shouldbe basedon more, rather than fewer anatomical studies. MATERIALS AND METItODS Alcoholic specimensrepresenting 33 genera
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Dynamics of Woodpecker Predation on Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus Planipennis) in the Northeastern U.S.A
    Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2016), 18, 174–181 DOI: 10.1111/afe.12142 Temporal dynamics of woodpecker predation on emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in the northeastern U.S.A. ∗ † ‡ † ∗ David E. Jennings ,JianJ.Duan, Leah S. Bauer ,JonathanM.Schmude, Miles T. Wetherington ∗ and Paula M. Shrewsbury ∗Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A., †Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, 501 South Chapel Street, Newark, DE 19711, U.S.A., and ‡Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3101 Technology Boulevard, Lansing, MI 48910, U.S.A. Abstract 1 Woodpeckers (Picidae) are important natural enemies attacking emerald ash borer (EAB) Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire in North America. There can be considerable variation in predation levels within and between sites, and among different times of year; therefore, understanding what causes these differences is necessary for effectively predicting EAB population dynamics. 2 We examined the temporal dynamics of woodpecker predation on EAB in Michigan and Maryland, as well as how they were affected by season, region, resource availability, tree size and crown condition. In Michigan, we quantified predation in association with EAB developmental stages on different trees over 2 years, whereas, in Maryland, we recorded woodpecker attacks on the same trees for 1 year. 3 Season was a significant predictor of woodpecker predation, with most occurring in winter when late-instar larvae were abundant. Predation also was affected by crown condition and tree size. Additionally, predation levels were similar throughout the year in a region where generations are considered to be less synchronized, representing a more consistent resource for woodpeckers.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior of Plain-Mantled Tit-Spinetail (Leptasthenura Aegithaloides) in Semiarid Matorral, North-Central Chile
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 22: 247–256, 2011 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF PLAIN-MANTLED TIT-SPINETAIL (LEPTASTHENURA AEGITHALOIDES) IN SEMIARID MATORRAL, NORTH-CENTRAL CHILE Andrew Engilis Jr. & Douglas A. Kelt Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology - University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Resumen. – Comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) en matorral semiárido, centro-norte de Chile. – Hemos estudiado el comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptas- thenura aegithaloides) en el matorral del centro-norte de Chile. Se trata de una especie de la familia Fur- nariidae que es insectívora recolectora desde perchas. Frecuenta los arbustos más dominantes y busca presas y alimentos principalmente en el follaje, grupos de flores, pequeñas ramas y masas de líquenes. Los arbustos preferidos incluyen a Porlieria y Baccharis. Se alimentan desde alturas cercanas al suelo hasta arbustos superiores a dos metros de altura. Se los encuentra más frecuentemente en parejas o en grupos pequeños, posiblemente familias, de tres a cinco aves. Las densidades promedio en el matorral (1,49 - 1,69 aves por hectárea) son mayores que las reportadas para otros lugares. Los tijerales en el matorral forman grupos de especies mixtas con facilidad, especialmente en el invierno Austral. Su estrategia de forrajeo y su comportamiento son similares a las del Mito sastrecillo de América del Norte (Psaltriparus minimus) y del Mito común (Aegithalos caudatus), ambos de la familia Aegithalidae, sugir- iendo estrategias ecológicas convergentes en ambientes estructuralmente similares. Abstract. – We studied foraging behavior of Plain-mantled Tit-spinetail (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) in matorral (scrubland) habitat of north-central Chile.
    [Show full text]