DOCSLIB.ORG

Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/9/9 2 May

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/9/9 2 May CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/9/9 2 May 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Ninth meeting Bonn, 19–30 May 2008 Item 2.2 of the provisional agenda* REPORT OF THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1. In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Conference of the Parties and the Council of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) contained in the annex to decision III/8, annex, the GEF Council prepares and submits a report for each ordinary meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Section 3 of the MOU provides a list of specific information, detailed information as well as other information to be included in the report. 2. In addition, in decision VIII/18, paragraph 2, the Conference of the Parties requested the Global Environment Facility, as the institutional structure operating the financial mechanism of the Convention, to include in its regular report to the Conference of the Parties information on: (a) The initial application of the Resource Allocation Framework to resources allocated in the fourth replenishment of the Global Environment Facility that is operational from July 2006, focusing on the biodiversity focal area; (b) How the Resource Allocation Framework is likely to affect funding available to developing countries and countries with economies in transition for the implementation of their commitments under the Convention. 3. In light of the above, the Executive Secretary is circulating herewith the report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties at its ninth meeting. * UNEP/CBD/COP/9/1. /… In order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat‘s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary-General‘s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. Global Environment Facility April 30, 2008 GEF REPORT TO THE NINTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This document reports on the activities of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) in the area of biological diversity for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007, as such it includes the end of the GEF-3 phase and the start of GEF-4. 2. The GEF, as the operating entity of the financial mechanism of the Convention on Biological Diversity, provides financing to country driven projects based on guidance received from the Conference of Parties. The report describes the GEF‘s activities in response to guidance received from the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its eighth session (COP VIII) held in Curitiba, Brazil, 20 - 31 March 2006, and other relevant decisions of previous COPs. One decision from COP VIII, Decision VIII/18, is directed towards the GEF and provides guidance to the financial mechanism. 3. During the reporting period, the GEF approved 54 full-size, 19 medium-size projects, and two enabling activities in the area of biological diversity (including biosafety). The total GEF allocation during the reporting period was approximately $ 306 million.1 An additional $1.536 billion was leveraged in co-financing for the projects from partners that included the GEF Agencies, bilateral agencies, recipient countries, and the private sector. In addition to the biodiversity portfolio, fourteen multi-focal area projects were partially supported with $ 42 million of biodiversity resources. In addition, 23 project preparation grants were approved in the reporting period amounting to approximately $4.3 million. 4. The document also describes GEF financed activities in the GEF focal areas of international waters and land degradation which also contributed directly or indirectly to the objectives and implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Through the international waters focal area, the GEF committed $61.82 million to 11 projects that supported directly or indirectly the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. An additional $315.36 million was leveraged as cofinancing for these international waters projects. In the land degradation focal area, six projects amounting to a total GEF commitment of approximately $30.14 million have components that address biodiversity conservation and/or sustainable use. An additional $194 million was leveraged as cofinancing for these land degradation projects. 5. The document reports on the activities of the GEF Evaluation Office during the reporting period that are related to the area of biological diversity including the following reports: Joint Evaluation of the GEF Small Grants Programme, GEF Annual Report on Impact, Country Evaluations, and an update of the Mid-Term Evaluation of the Resource Allocation Framework. Initial results from the GEF-3 portfolio in terms of the coverage of the investment are also provided. 6. Other relevant issues discussed include the Biodiversity Strategy for GEF-4, the GEF Sustainable Forest Management Program, Collaboration with the CBD Secretariat on the formulation of a Strategy for Resource Mobilization for the CBD, and an update on the progress in implementing the GEF reforms. 1 All figures in this report are in US dollars. Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Project Activities in the Area of Biological Diversity ..................................................... 1 A. GEF-3 Biodiversity Strategy ..................................................................................................... 1 B. GEF-4 Biodiversity Strategy ...................................................................................................... 3 C. Sustainable Forest Management during GEF-4 ......................................................................... 4 D. Summary of Project Activities in Biological Diversity ............................................................. 6 Full-sized Projects ........................................................................................................................... 6 Medium-sized Projects.................................................................................................................... 7 Enabling Activities .......................................................................................................................... 7 Project Development Grants ........................................................................................................... 8 Small Grants Program ..................................................................................................................... 8 III. Activities in Response to COP Guidance ........................................................................ 8 Protected Areas: Systemic Approaches to Improving Protected Area Management ...................... 9 Sustainably Using Biodiversity through Mainstreaming .............................................................. 12 Access to genetic resources and fair and equitable sharing of benefits (ABS) ............................. 14 Biosafety ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Biological Diversity and Climate Change ..................................................................................... 18 Marine/Coastal Biodiversity and Island Biodiversity ................................................................... 20 Invasive Alien Species (IAS) ........................................................................................................ 22 Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI) ................................................................................................ 23 Taxonomy Support through Enabling Activities .............................................................. 24 Taxonomy Support through Full and Medium Sized Projects .......................................... 24 Taxonomy Support through Small Grants Program ......................................................... 24 Strategic Plan of the Convention .................................................................................................. 24 Technology Transfer and Cooperation .......................................................................................... 25 National Reporting ........................................................................................................................ 26 Communication, Education and Public Awareness ...................................................................... 27 IV. Activities in Other GEF Focal Areas of relevance to this report ................................... 28 International Waters ...................................................................................................................... 28 Land Degradation Focal Area ....................................................................................................... 29 V. Monitoring & Evaluation Results .................................................................................. 30 A. GEF-3 Portfolio Monitoring Results ....................................................................................... 30 Monitoring Results at the Portfolio Level......................................................................... 30 Coverage Results from GEF-3 .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Argentina-Carbon-And-Forests.Pdf
    22383 Public Disclosure Authorized ARGENTINA: Carbon and Forests Prepared by Roger A. Sedjo and Eduardo Ley Resourcesfor the Future Public Disclosure Authorized 1616 P Street NW Washington. D. C. December 4, 1995 Public Disclosure Authorized Report Prepared for the Global Environmental Facility of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized FILE COPY ARGENTINA: Carbon and Forests' Roger A. Sedjo and Eduardo Ley Resources for the Future December 4, 1995 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. GLO13AL W ARM ING AND CARBO N ......................................................................................... 1 1 THE CuRRENT SrruATIoN.................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 TYPESOF H umAN REspoNsEs............................................................................................................ 6 13 TooLs To MTGATE THE BUILD-UP OF ATMOSPHERIc CARBON......................................................... 6 2. FOREST MANAGEMENT: MITIGATION ACTIVITIES AND SINK ENHANCEMENT.... 8 2.1 How M ucH FOREST?......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 FoREST M EGATION POUCIES............................................................................................................ 9 3. ARGENTINA: CARBON AND FORESTS ...................................................................... 6.........16 3.1 FoREsTs Iq ARGENTNA ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Roster of Experts
    Draft Roster of Experts Revised on 14 June, 2010 Name Affiliation Nationality Regional Country Area of Expertise Other significant experiences Years Academic Experience Experience of Background Experi ence Cyrille Adebu Co-ordinator, Congolaise Africa DRC, Civil society issues Expertise in engagement of civil society on forestry issues, 15 Science Organisation Cameroon infrastructure development etc. Responsible for multiple Graduate concertée des projects in OCEAN. Also worked as consultant with GTZ, ecologiestes et PANOS Paris (an organisation which reflects the diversity emis de la nature of contemporary societies, where all communities, (OCEAN) including the most marginalised, are able to express their points of view) and with Rainforest Foundation. D. James Baker Director, Global USA US US Environmental Isseus He educated as a physicist, practiced as an oceanographer, 20 Ph.D Carbon and Climate Change and has held science and management positions in Measurement particularly coastal academia, not for profit, and government institutions. He Program, The zone management and is also a member of the U.S. Commission on Climate and William J. Clinton oceanography Tropical Forests. He is a Visiting Senior Fellow at the Foundation, New Center for Analysis of Time Series at the London School of York, Economics and Political Science and an adjunct professor at the University of Pennsylvania and at the University of Delaware. He is a member of the international Science Steering Committee for the Census of Marine Life; has served on Presidential Commissions; chaired numerous national and international advisory committees; led oceanographic expeditions to many parts of the world and has lectured and published widely on the topics of oceanography, climate, and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in the Forestry Sector: Some Issues for a Changing Workforce 60 'ZEJCPIG4GUGCTEJCPF'ZVGPUKQP, FAO, Viale H
    ISSN 0041-6436 Food and Agriculture An international journal Vol. 61 Organization of forestry and forest of the United Nations industries 2010/1-2 234/235 Editor: A. Perlis Contents Editorial Advisory Board: T. Hofer, F. Kafeero, H. Ortiz Chour, Editorial 2 A. Perlis, E. Rametsteiner, S. Rose, J. Tissari, P. van Lierop, P. Vantomme, M.L. Wilkie O. Serrano Emeritus Advisers: J. Ball, I.J. Bourke, C. Palmberg-Lerche, XIII World Forestry Congress – Forests in development: a vital balance 3 L. Russo D.K. Lee and J. Heino Regional Advisers: F. Bojang, C. Carneiro, P. Durst Sixty years of collaborative partnership between FAO and IUFRO: towards the next sixty 12 Unasylva is published in English, French and Spanish. Payment is no longer required. Free R.S. Purnamasari subscriptions can be obtained by sending an Dynamics of small-scale deforestation in Indonesia: examining the e-mail to [email protected] effects of poverty and socio-economic development 14 Subscription requests from institutions (e.g. libraries, companies, organizations, universities) E. Durán, J.J. Figel and D.B. Bray rather than individuals are preferred to make the Uncertain coexistence: jaguars and communities in montane forests journal accessible to more readers. All issues of Unasylva are available online free of Mexico 21 of charge at www.fao.org/forestry/unasylva M. Jack and P. Hall Comments and queries are welcome: [email protected] Large-scale forests for bioenergy: land-use, economic and environmental implications 23 Reproduction and dissemination of material in this publication for educational or other S. Wu, Y. Hou and G.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Processi Di Deforestazione: I Driver
    1. Processi di deforestazione: i driver Nella Comunicazione della Commissione al Parlamento Europeo “Intensificare l'azione dell'UE per proteggere e ripristinare le foreste del pianeta”, pubblicata lo scorso luglio, la Commissione Europea ha messo in luce come “le foreste del pianeta [corrano] gravi pericoli a causa della deforestazione e del degrado forestale” (Commissione Europea (CE) COM (2019) 352, p.1). Deforestazione e degrado sono fenomeni diversi, con importanti ma differenti impatti sulle risorse forestali (Figura 1). Per deforestazione si intende la variazione di formaun cambiamento d’uso del suolo, con passaggio dalla foresta un uso e una copertura di tipo forestale a forme d’uso e coperture di tipo diverso, come quello urbano, agricolo o pastorale (Schoene et al., 2007). Si assume, di norma, che per effetto di ciò la vegetazione forestale non tornerà a insediarsi naturalmente nelle aree deforestate, se non eventualmente nel lungo termine, ad esempio per effetto di abbandono delle stesse, oppure a seguito di interventi di riforestazione antropicaattiva. Tipicamente processi di deforestazione possono verificarsi per effetto della conversione di una foresta o di parte di essa in un pascolo, oppure in un’area agricola coltivata o ancora in un’area urbana. Di contro, il degrado forestale si esplicita in una riduzione di lungo termine della funzionalità della foresta, vale a dire della sua integrità, funzionalità ecologica e complessità della foresta, e conseguentemente anche della sua capacità di fornire prodotti e servizi (Schoene et al., 2007). Ciò non determina una conversione della foresta in altre forme d’uso del suolo, piuttosto porta a una riduzione quali-quantitativa della copertura arborea1 per effetto, ad esempio, di prelievi prolungati e ripetuti di piante della medesima specie, oppure di fattori naturali quali il fuoco o attacchi di patogeni.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Soybean Trade the Geopolitics of a Bean
    Global Soybean Trade The Geopolitics of a Bean Marcello De Maria†*, Elizabeth J. Robinson†, Joseph Rajabu Kangile‡, Reuben Kadigi‡, Ilda Dreoni#°, Matheus Couto§, Niko Howai†, Jurgen Peci† and Sicily Fiennes§ †University of Reading – School of Agriculture, Policy and Development ‡Sokoine University of Agriculture – School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies #University of Southampton – School of Social Statistics and Demography °University of Southampton – School of Geography and Environmental Science §UNEP – WCMC *Corresponding Author Partners Funders ii The UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) Trade, Development and the Environment Hub is working with over 50 partner organisations From 15 diFFerent countries. The project aims to make sustainable trade a positive Force in the world by Focusing on the impact oF the trade oF speciFic goods and seeking solutions to these impacts. How to cite this report: De Maria, M., Robinson, E. J. Z., Kangile, J. R., Kadigi, R., Dreoni, I., Couto, M., Howai, N., Peci, J., Fiennes, S. (2020): Global Soybean Trade. The Geopolitics of a Bean. UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) Trade, Development and the Environment Hub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34892/7yn1-k494. License: CC-BY 4.0. Lead & Corresponding Author: Dr. Marcello De Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1969-0251 – [email protected] Orcid: Robinson, E. J. Z. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4950-0183 Kadigi, R. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-86761852 Dreoni, I. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-522X Peci, J. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0953-0780 iii Acknowledgments We acknowledge funding from the UK Research and Innovation’s Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) through the Trade, Development and the Environment Hub project (project number ES/S008160/1).
    [Show full text]
  • International Forest Policy by International and Transnational Organizations
    Sarah L. Burns In recent decades, globalization and internationalization led to an increase in the number of international policies and regimes as well as the creation of a new form of governance based on voluntary agreements, International Forest Policy by International attempting to infl uence national behaviour over many different issues. By using the case of the inter- national forest regime complex this thesis seeks to evaluate how an international organization as the and Transnational Organizations World Bank and private institutions of forest certifi cation infl uence domestic forest policy. The cases of Argentina and Armenia were selected as examples of developing countries open to international infl u- Case Studies of World Bank and Forest Certifi cation Organizations ences with weak forest sectors that went through a recent administrative restructuring. In so doing this in Argentina and Armenia dissertation seeks to answer how do international and transnational organizations infl uence domestic forest policies? Sarah L. Burns Sarah L. Burns International Forest Policy by and Transnational Organizations ISBN 978-3-86395-216-7 UniversitätsdruckeUniversitätsverlag Göttingen Göttingen Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Sarah L. Burns International Forest Policy by International and Transnational Organizations This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. erschienen in der Reihe der Universitätsdrucke im Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2016 Sarah L. Burns International Forest Policy by International and Transnational Organizations Case Studies of the World Bank and Forest Certification Organizations in Argentina and Armenia Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2016 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment of the Importation Into the United States of Unproc- Essed Eucalyptus Logs and Chips from South America
    United States Department of Agriculture Pest Risk Assessment Forest Service of the Importation into Forest Products Laboratory the United States of General Technical Unprocessed Eucalyptus Report FPL−GTR−124 Logs and Chips from South America A moderate pest risk potential was assigned to eleven other Abstract organisms or groups of organisms: eucalypt weevils In this report, we assess the unmitigated pest risk potential of (Gonipterus spp.), carpenterworm (Chilecomadia valdivi- importing Eucalyptus logs and chips from South America ana) on two Eucalyptus species other than E. nitens, platy- into the United States. To do this, we estimated the likeli- podid ambrosia beetle (Megaplatypus parasulcatus), yellow hood and consequences of introducing representative insects phorancantha borer (Phoracantha recurva), subterranean and pathogens of concern. Nineteen individual pest risk termites (Coptotermes spp., Heterotermes spp.), foliar assessments were prepared, eleven dealing with insects and diseases (Aulographina eucalypti, Cryptosporiopsis eight with pathogens. The selected organisms were represen- eucalypti, Cylindrocladium spp., Phaeophleospora spp., tative examples of insects and pathogens found on the foli- Mycosphaerella spp.), eucalyptus rust (Puccinia psidii), age, on the bark, in the bark, and in the wood of Eucalyptus Cryphonectria canker (Cryphonectria cubensis), Cytospora spp. Among the insects and pathogens assessed, eight were cankers (Cytospora eucalypticola, Cytospora eucalyptina), rated a high risk potential: purple moth (Sarsina
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services from Bioenergy Development: a Pan American Experience
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2017 IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Colin Phifer Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2017 Colin Phifer Recommended Citation Phifer, Colin, "IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2017. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/533 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons IMPACTS TO BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT: A PAN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE By Colin C. Phifer A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Forest Science MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Colin C. Phifer This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Forest Science. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Dissertation Co-Advisor: David Flaspohler Dissertation Co-Advisor: Christopher Webster Committee Member: Chelsea Schelly Committee Member: Daniel Gruner School Dean: Terry Sharik Dedicated to Tina and River Phifer, my family (Jasper, you too) Table of Contents Preface..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Degradation in the Argentine Chaco an Assessment of Regional Land-Use and Rural Livelihoods
    Land degradation in the Argentine Chaco An assessment of regional land-use and rural livelihoods Land Transformation in the Chaco province, Argentina, in January 2020 (Source: Greenpeace Argentina) Master’s Thesis M.Sc. Sustainable Development By Saskia Hüsch Utrecht, September 10, 2020 Submitted by: Saskia Hüsch (6361498) [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. Guus van Westen Assistant Professor Utrecht University 2nd reader: Dr.ir. Janwillem Liebrand Assistant Professor Utrecht University External supervisor Alex Ehrenhaus Country Manager International Soy Program Coordinator Solidaridad Argentina Acknowledgments Even though I was not able to visit and experience the Argentine Chaco myself, various local contacts shared their insights and observations- without which I could have not conducted this research. In the light of increasing incidents of expansive deforestation and fires during these past months, a new critical phase for the region, many local actors are extremely occupied with work related to environmental and social activism. Therefore, I highly appreciate the time that participants spent to provide me with information and to support me to their best abilities; Gracias a todos los que participaron en mi investigación; Gracias por su apoyo y entusiasmo por mi enfoque, lo agradezco mucho. Les deseo éxito y fuerza en sus esfuerzos! Two people deserve a special thanks: first, Alex Ehrenhaus, from Solidaridad Argentina. By introducing me to the topic and the region, you provided me with a both urgent and interesting research direction. The calls and discussions with you led to countless insights that helped to shape my thesis- thank you so much for this research collaboration, it opened up a lot of opportunities! Second, Raúl Montenegro: for building bridges, sharing your valuable understanding of the Argentine Chaco and being a constant guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Agroforestry
    Citation: Mercer, D.E., G.E. Frey, and F.W. Cubbage. 2014. Economics of Agroforestry. In: Kant S. and J.R.R. Alavalapati (eds.). Handbook of Forest Economics. Earthscan from Routledge. New York. Pp. 188-209. 13 ECONOMICS OF AGROFORESTRY D. Evan Mercer, 1 Gregory E. Frey 2 and Frederick W. Cubbage 3 1RESEARCH ECONOMIST, USDA FOREST SERVICE, USA. 2ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AND EXTENSION SPECIALIST FOR FORESTRY, VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY, USA. 3PROFESSOR, INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY, NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY, ECONOMICS, CERTIFICATION AND AGROFORESTRY, NC STATE UNIVERSITY, USA. Abstract This chapter provides principles, literature and a case study about the economics of agroforestry. We examine necessary conditions for achieving efficiency in agroforestry system design and economic analysis tools for assessing efficiency and adaptability of agroforestry. The tools pre­ sented here (capital budgeting, linear progranuning, production frontier analysis and risk analy­ sis) can help determine when agroforestry is a feasible option and provide arguments for cases when agroforestry systems are economically, socially and environmentally appropriate, fostering improved sustainable development for landowners, farmers and communities.The chapter closes with a case study applying the capital budgeting and real options analysis to evaluate the poten­ tial for agroforestry to augment efforts to restore bottomland hardwood forests in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Agroforestry systems provide multiple outputs, potentially reducing risk and increasing income while also purportedly producing more ecosystem services than conventional agriculture. Our review and case study, however, provide cautionary tales about the limits of agroforestry and the need for rigorous economic research and analysis to design efficient and productive agroforestry systems and to optimize private and public investments in agroforestry.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculiture
    : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULITURE BIBLIOGRAPHICAL BULLETIN NO. 18 Washington, D. C. Issued May 1952 THE FORESTS OF CONTINENTAL LATIN AMERICA (Including European Possessions) A Bibliography of Selected Literature, 1920-1950 Compiled by Frances J. Flick Division of Bibliography, Library United States Government Printing Office Washington : 1952 For tile Superintendent of Ilortillienis. U. S. Itiirerlinielit Printing I Wive Washington 2:i. D. - routs OSCUMM V4g1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BIBLIOGRAPHICAL BULLETIN NO. 18 Washington, D. C. Issued May 1952 THE FORESTS OF CONTINENTAL LATIN AMERICA (Including European Possessions) A Bibliography of Selected Literature, 1920-1950 Compiled by Frances J. Flick Division of Bibliography, Library United States Government Printing Office Washington : 1952 For sale by the Superintendent of Doenments. U. S. Government Printing (Mier Washington 25. D. D. - Pike -15 cents ID 1.1) igti a N PREFACE This bibliography is the result of a selective examination of book and periodical literature published between 1920 and 1950, on the forests of Mexico, Central America, and South America. It is a guide to back- ground information for anyone interested in the standing timber re source and its utilization, in these lands below our Mexican border. The listing of references is subdivided by country. British Honduras and the Guianas are included on the basis of their place in the conti- nental economy, even though they are not Latin-American in a polit- ical sense. Due to the large number of entries collected under the General heading, and for Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, these four divisions again are subdivided, segregating references on vegetation and timber description from ,forest policy and forest industry materi- al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry in Argentina: the Use of Needle Length As a Site Quality Indicator in Young Ponderosa Pine Plantations in Northern Patagonia
    Forestry in Argentina: The use of needle length as a site quality indicator in young ponderosa pine plantations in northern Patagonia. by Margaret A. McAndrews A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in International Studies in Forest Management Presented on May 24, 1999 Commencement June 13, 1999 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Margaret A. McAndrews for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in International Studies in Forestry presented on May 24. 199,9. Title: Forestry in Argentina: The of Neuguén, Argenti1a/ Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Dr. Dou&taauire Needle length in young ponderosa pine (Pinusponderosa Dougl. ex Laws var. ponderosa) was assessed for its ability to estimate site quality of afforested land in Neuquén, Argentina. The objective was to determine the best aspect on the tree, number of needle age classes, and number of trees that would best predict top height in these plantations at age 20. Needles were sampled from thirty subplots representative of the geographical and productivity range of this species. On the fifth whorl of each sample tree, random groups of 10 fascicles were collected from various trees, aspects, and age classes and measured for average needle length. Total height, height to the first and sixth whorls above breast height and diameter at breast height were measured on each sample tree. Weighted simple linear regression models quantified the relationship between needle length and top height of the stand at 20 years, with top height specified as the mean height of four possible stand components.
    [Show full text]