DOCSLIB.ORG

Syllabus Radical Jewish Philosophy: Lecture on the Writin - 14256

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syllabus Radical Jewish Philosophy: Lecture on the Writin - 14256 Syllabus Radical Jewish Philosophy: lecture on the writin - 14256 Last update 19-04-2015 HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 1st degree (Bachelor) Responsible Department: jewish thought Academic year: 2 Semester: 1st Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Shalom Sadik Coordinator Email: [email protected] Coordinator Office Hours: after the lesson Teaching Staff: Shalom Zadik page 1 / 3 Course/Module description: During the course, we will studies two Jewish philosophers, which belong to the Averroist trend, at the beginning of the 14th century, Rabbi Itzhak Pulgar and "Rabbi Isaac Albalag. Averroist Jewish thought largely represents the more radical philosophical Jewish interpretation. These two thinkers are completely naturalistic and base largely there interpretations on the most radical reading of the philosophy of Maimonides. The course will be based on a close reading of both authors. Course/Module aims: Develop a critical approach to religious issues. Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: Better understanding of the Averroist thinkers. Attendance requirements(%): 80 Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: reading textes Course/Module Content: Rabbi Isaac Pulgar "Ezer Hadat", Rabbi Isaac Albalag "tikkun Hadeot". Required Reading: Rabbi Isaac Pulgar "Ezer Hadat", Rabbi Isaac Albalag "tikkun Hadeot". Additional Reading Material: Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes. Leiden 2007 י' גוטמן, "משנתו של יצחק אלבלג", בתוך: ספר זיכרון ללוי גינצברג, ניו יורק תש"ו, עמ' פב-פג Del Valle, La Contradiction Del Hereje De Issac Ben Polgar, in: Jewish Studies at the turn of the Twentieth Century, Toledo 1998, pp. 553-558. ste juif traducteur et annotateur dAl Ghazali. Parisןac Albalag averroבG. Vajda. Is 1960 ac Albalag. REJ. 121בtique chez Isיproph יritיphilosophique et v יritיCH. Touati. V (1962). Pp. 35- 47. CH. Touati. 'Dieu et le monde selon Moise Narboni'. Archives dhistoire doctrinale et .ge 29 (1954). Pp. 193-205ג-raire du moyenיlitt D. Lasker Averroistic Trends in Jewish-Christian Polemics in the Late Middle Ages, page 2 / 3 Speculum, 55:2 (1980): 294-304. D.J. Lasker. Jewish Philosophical Polemics against Christianity in the Midlle ages. New York 1977. ש' פינס, בין מחשבת ישראל למחשבת העמים. ירושלים תשל"ג. ש' פינס, 'על סוגיות אחדות הכלולות בספר עזר הדת ליצחק פולקר ותקבולת להן אצל שפינוזה', בתוך: ספר לכבוד התשבי, ירושלים תשמו. ש' צדיק, 'רצון ה', ידיעת ה' ורצון האדם בהגותו של רבי יצחק פולקר', דעת 76 (תשע"ד), עמ' -147 172. ש' צדיק, 'בחירת האדם ורצון החיות בפילוסופיה היהודית בסוף ימי הביניים', JSIJ 9 (2010), -181 203. .sme, Paris 1852ןs et l'AverroטE.Renan, Averro N. Roth. Issac Polgar y su libro contra un converso. Polemica judeo cristinia estudios. Madrid 1992. Pp. 67- 73. Course/Module evaluation: End of year written/oral examination 0 % Presentation 0 % Participation in Tutorials 20 % Project work 80 % Assignments 0 % Reports 0 % Research project 0 % Quizzes 0 % Other 0 % Additional information: ` page 3 / 3 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA, Second Edition, Volume 2 Lowers of Aristotle
    aristotle lowers of Aristotle, at times as his critics, included, during the the question of *creation. Aristotle based his notion that the 13t and 14t centuries – Samuel ibn *Tibbon, Jacob *Anatoli, world is eternal on the nature of time and motion (Physics, Shem Tov ibn *Falaquera, Levi b. Abraham of Villefranche, 8:1–3; Metaphysics, 12:6, 1–2; De Caelo, 1:10–12) and on the Joseph *Kaspi, Zerahiah b. Isaac *Gracian, *Hillel b. Samuel impossibility of assuming a genesis of prime matter (Physics, of Verona, Isaac *Albalag, Moses *Abulafia, *Moses b. Joshua 1:9). In contrast to the Kalām theologians, who maintained the of Narbonne, and *Levi b. Gershom (Gersonides), their most doctrine of temporal creation, the medieval Muslim philoso- outstanding representative; from the 15t to the 17t century – phers interpreted creation as eternal, i.e., as the eternal pro- Simeon b. Ẓemaḥ *Duran, Joseph *Albo, the brothers Joseph cession of forms which emanate from the active or creative and Isaac *Ibn Shem Tov, Abraham *Bibago, *Judah b. Jehiel knowledge of God (see *Emanation). The task with which the Messer Leon, Elijah *Delmedigo, Moses *Almosnino, and Jo- Jewish Aristotelians were faced was either to disprove or to seph Solomon *Delmedigo. (The exact relation of these phi- accept the notion of the world’s eternity. Maimonides offers losophers to Aristotle may be gathered from the entries ap- a survey and refutation of Kalām proofs for creation and ad- pearing under their names.) vances his own theory of temporal creation (Guide, 2:17), for which he indicates the theological motive that miracles are Issues in Jewish Aristotelianism possible only in a universe created by a spontaneous divine Jewish Aristotelianism is a complex phenomenon, the general will (2:25).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Beginning the Conversation
    NOTES 1 Beginning the Conversation 1. Jacob Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (New York: Schocken, 1969). 2. John Micklethwait, “In God’s Name: A Special Report on Religion and Public Life,” The Economist, London November 3–9, 2007. 3. Mark Lila, “Earthly Powers,” NYT, April 2, 2006. 4. When we mention the clash of civilizations, we think of either the Spengler battle, or a more benign interplay between cultures in individual lives. For the Spengler battle, see Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). For a more benign interplay in individual lives, see Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999). 5. Micklethwait, “In God’s Name.” 6. Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005). “Interview with Robert Wuthnow” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly April 26, 2002. Episode no. 534 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week534/ rwuthnow.html 7. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 291. 8. Eric Sharpe, “Dialogue,” in Mircea Eliade and Charles J. Adams, The Encyclopedia of Religion, first edition, volume 4 (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 345–8. 9. Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald and John Borelli, Interfaith Dialogue: A Catholic View (London: SPCK, 2006). 10. Lily Edelman, Face to Face: A Primer in Dialogue (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith, Adult Jewish Education, 1967). 11. Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament (New York: Knopf, 1967), 5, 11. 12. Ibid., 375.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Image of Jacob Engraved Upon the Throne: Further Reflection on the Esoteric Doctrine of the German Pietists
    1 The Image of Jacob Engraved upon the Throne: Further Reflection on the Esoteric Doctrine of the German Pietists Verily, at this time that which was hidden has been revealed because forgetfulness has reached its final limit; the end of forgetfulness is the beginning of remembrance. Abraham Abulafia,'Or ha-Sekhel, MS Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek 92, fol. 59b I One of the most interesting motifs in the world of classical rabbinic aggadah is that of the image of Jacob engraved on the throne of glory. My intention in this chapter is to examine in detail the utilization of this motif in the rich and varied literature of Eleazar ben Judah of Worms, the leading literary exponent of the esoteric and mystical pietism cultivated by the Kalonymide circle of German Pietists in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The first part of the chapter will investigate the ancient traditions connected to this motif as they appear in sources from Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages in order to establish the basis for the distinctive understanding that evolves in the main circle of German Pietists to be discussed in the second part. As I will argue in detail later, the motif of the image of Jacob has a special significance in the theosophy of the German Pietists, particularly as it is expounded in the case of Eleazar. The amount of attention paid by previous scholarship to this theme is disproportionate in relation to the central place that it occupies in the esoteric ruminations of the Kalonymide Pietists. 1 From several passages in the writings of Eleazar it is clear that the motif of the image of Jacob is covered and cloaked in utter secrecy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolerance & Intolerance
    Initiative für Toleranzforschung TOLERANCE & INTOLERANCE AS CHALLENGE IN PAST AND PRESENT | CONFERENCE | 27–29 MARCH 2019 PROGRAMME WEDNESDAY MARCH 27TH 2019 15:00-15:30 WELCOMING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTION Giuseppe Veltri (University of Hamburg) and Jörg Rüpke (University of Erfurt) PANEL 1 15:30-16:30 CONCEPTUALIZING TOLERANCE What Toleration Is Not David Heyd (Philosophy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) The Disapproval-Respect Model of Tolerance: a Social Psychological Approach Bernd Simon (Political Psychology, University of Kiel) 16:30-17:00 Coffee Break PANEL 2 17:00-18:30 TOLERANCE WITHIN RELIGIOUS CONTEXT AND URBAN ENVIROMENT Basis for Toleration in the Roman Word Mar Marcos Sánchez (Ancient History, History of Religion, University of Cantabria) Tolerance and Urban Religion Jörg Rüpke (Comparative Religious Studies, University of Erfurt) Theology of Stones. Reflections on the Christian City and the Place of Religious Minorities Christiana Facchini (History of Christianity and Religious Studies, University of Bologna) 19:30 Dinner (Restaurant) THURSDAY MARCH 28TH 2019 9:00-12:30 Time to visit Hamburg (guided tour or free) 12:30 Lunch (Schlueterstrasse 51) PANEL 3 13:00-15:30 TOLERANCE IN JEWISH AND ISLAMIC TRADITION Tolerance in the Fatimid Empire (909-1171) Serena Tolino (Islamic Studies, University of Hamburg) Between Belief and Unbelief: Paradigms of Tolerance in al-Ghazālī, Ibn Rushd, and Isaac Albalag Bakinaz Abdalla (Jewish Studies, MC Gill University) Institut für Jüdische Philosophie und Religion | Schlüterstraße 51 | 20146
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Bibliographiques
    NOTES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES Shimeon BRISMAN. — History and Guide to Judaic Dictionaries and Concordan- ces, Hoboken (N.J.), Ktav Publishing House, 2000, XXIII + 337 pages («Jewish Research Literature», 3/1). M. Brisman a déjà fourni d’ambitieux répertoires: A History and Guide to Jewish Bibliography, Cincinnati, Hebrew Union College-New York, Ktav, 1977, répertoire des bibliographies d’études juives, y compris les catalogues de bibliothèques, par thèmes, chaque ouvrage faisant l’objet d’une notice détaillée et annotée; Judaic Encyclopedias and Lexicons, Cincinnati, H.U.C., 1987 («Jewish Research Litera- ture», 2), répertoire des encyclopédies et lexiques d’études juives, par thèmes, cha- que chapitre étant couvert dans l’ordre chronologique et chaque ouvrage faisant l’objet d’une notice. Dans l’ouvrage en recension, chaque entrée donne lieu à une notice et à des no- tes. Ce volume ne couvre que les dictionnaires (ce qu’un sous-titre eût plus commo- dément indiqué), le t. 2, à venir, devant traiter des concordances; les lexiques et glossaires anciens (XIe-XVIIIe s.) y tiennent presque autant de place que les moder- nes. Outre les dictionnaires de l’hébreu, sont aussi inclus les dictionnaires de l’ara- méen, du yiddish et du judéo-espagnol, d’où le titre («Judaic»). Neuf chapitres, p. 1-155 et notes p. 265-312, retracent l’histoire de chaque sous-genre: lexicogra- phie hébraïque du moyen âge (Xe-XIe s.); lexicographes juifs du moyen âge (XIIe- XIVe s.); gloses et glossaires (XIe-XVIIe s.); Élie Lévita et les hébraïsants chrétiens (XVe-déb. XVIIe s.); lexicographie hébraïque moderne (XVIIIe-milieu du XXe s.); la résurrection de l’hébreu parlé (fin XIXe-fin du XXe s.); dictionnaires d’araméen et talmudico-rabbiniques (XIXe-XXe s.); dictionnaires à sujets divers (d’un intérêt particulier: dictionnaires d’abréviations, vocabulaires spécialisés et techniques, mots étrangers ou rares [travaux d’I.
    [Show full text]
  • Para Construir La Verdad: La Lógica Como Nexo Entre La Tradición Judeo- Árabe Y La Visión Deleytable
    ARTÍCULOS Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía ISSN-e 1988-2564 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/ASHF.61531 Para construir la verdad: La lógica como nexo entre la tradición judeo- árabe y la Visión deleytable Michelle M. Hamilton1 Recibido: 12 de julio de 2018 / Aceptado: 30 de septiembre de 2018 Resumen. Un glosario de términos hebreos y sus equivalentes en romance, recopilados de un tratado sobre la lógica y la filosofía compuesto por Maimónides (al-Maqālah fi-ṣināʻat al-manṭiq), circulaba en hebreo aljamiado entre judíos y/o conversos empapados en el humanismo castellano del siglo XV. Este glosario se incluye en una colección de textos que también contiene varias obras literarias de autores conversos, entre ellas, la Visión deleytable de Alfonso de la Torre, extractos de la traducción de las sentenciae de Séneca realizada por Alfonso de Cartagena, y otros tres glosarios de términos de índole aristotélica. La existencia de esta colección en el MS Parma 2666 en la Biblioteca Palatina, Parma, Italia, es testimonio de que lectores judíos y/o conversos del siglo XV (los que podían leer el hebreo aljamiado) leían e interpretaban la Visión deleytable en el contexto de la tradición filosófica árabe- hebrea que se conocía en la España del siglo XV en traducciones hebreas y latinas. En este artículo examino cómo el vocabulario filosófico elaborado en al-Manṭiq y asequible en romance en el glosario en MS Parma 2666 refleja la epistemología maimonidiana, tal como sobrevivía en un círculo intelectual de conversos/judíos –lectores de la Visión– partícipes de la traducción de las obras de Maimónides y de sus fuentes en el siglo XV.
    [Show full text]
  • MAIMONIDES CENTRE for ADVANCED STUDIES November 12–14, 2018 INTERNATIONNAL CONFERENCE SCEPTICISM and ANTI-SCEPTICISM in JEWISH AVERROISM NOVEMBER 12–14, 2018
    MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES November 12–14, 2018 INTERNATIONNAL CONFERENCE SCEPTICISM AND ANTI-SCEPTICISM IN JEWISH AVERROISM NOVEMBER 12–14, 2018 “Jewish Averroism” is a concept that usually refers to Jewish philosophers from the thirteenth century onwards who philosophised within the context of Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotelian philosophy. At the same time, many of them were committed to Maimonides’ legacy of reconciling philosophical investigation with the Law of Moses. In order to settle this apparent tension, they interpreted Judaism in light of Averroes’ Aristotelianism on the assumption that Judaism and true philosophy must always coincide. Although Averroes’ philosophy and commentary were attractive to some circles, others found it unsatisfactory or simply threatening to the traditional way of life. These thinkers responded with various critiques of Averroes, his followers, and the Averroistic approach to philosophy and its relationship to revealed religion. The purpose of the conference is to crystallise the understanding of Jewish Averroism as a philosophical and cultural phenomenon. Special emphasis will be put upon the Jewish Averroists’ engagement with Maimonides’ apparent sceptical approach, mainly concerning metaphysical knowledge, about which Averroes is patently dogmatic. Finally, lectures about various aspects of anti- Averroism will serve as a necessary counterbalance. VENUE: Convenors Racheli Haliva (Universität Hamburg/Germany) MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Yoav Meyrav (Universität Hamburg/Germany)
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretations of Tohu Wa-Vohu As Matter and Form
    1 Hannu Töyrylä: Slimy Stones and Philosophy: Interpretations of tohu wa-vohu as Matter and Form 7.11.2000 Copyright Hannu Toyryla 2000, 2004 email: [email protected] 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2 2. The Biblical and Rabbinic Basis for the Interpretations.................................................................2 2.1 The Biblical basis...................................................................................................................2 2.2 Relevant interpretations in Talmud and Midrash: Chaos or created entities...........................3 2.3 Green line, slimy stones.........................................................................................................4 2.4 From Sefer Yetzirah to the book Bahir ...................................................................................6 3. Medieval Concepts of Matter and Form........................................................................................9 4. Bar Hiyya's Discussion on Matter and Form...............................................................................11 4.1 Bar Hiyya's theory of matter and form..................................................................................11 4.2 Matter and form as tohu and bohu .......................................................................................12 4.3 Bar Hiyya's cosmogonic exegesis........................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • SKEPTISISME TEOLOGIS DAN JAWABAN FILSAFAT Norbertus Jegalus
    68 SKEPTISISME TEOLOGIS DAN JAWABAN FILSAFAT Norbertus Jegalus Abstract Human language deals with sense experience. When human language has to speak on God, there comes the problem on which experience man can talk about Him. For God does not deal with human sense experience. How is it possible to use human language which is limited to his sense experience, to speak on God without lowering Him on human level? It precisely is the possibility of analogy. Analogy makes human language remain limited to his dimensional life and, at the same time, gives the possibility to speak on and talk with God. For essentially human being is spiritual and his language by his reason and the will contains human capacity to reach God. Keywords Reason. Analogy. Will. Logos. Transendence. Transconceptional. Abstrak Bahasa manusia adalah bahasa yang berhubungan dengan pengalaman indrawi. Namun bahasa itu justru dipakai oleh manusia untuk berbicara tentang Allah padahal Allah itu bukanlah realitas indrawi. Bagaimana mungkin bahasa insani yang bersifat indrawi itu mungkin berbicara tentang Allah. Jawabannya, manusia mungkin berbicara tentang Allah, dengan tanpa merendahkan Allah menjadi setaraf dengan manusia, dan itulah kemungkinan bahasa analog tentang Allah. Dengan analogi itu, manusia, meski secara terbatas, mampu mengenal dan berbicara tentang Allah, karena ia bukanlah materi belaka melainkan makhluk rohani. Kerohanian itulah yang memungkinkan manusia, melalui dinamisme akal dan kehendak, mampu berbahasa dan mencapai Allah dalam bahasa insani yang sensibilis. Kata-kata kunci: akal budi, analogi, kehendak, logos, transendensi, transkonsepsional. 69 1. Pendahuluan Skeptisisme teologis dalam teologi kontemporer umumnya berdasarkan pada tiga hal yakni kodrat pengetahuan manusia, kodrat Allah itu sendiri dan kodrat bahasa manusia.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Sayings of Rav As a Diasporan Manifesto 101–121 When the Jews
    Volume 24 Meir Ben Shahar No. 2 “A Future and a Hope” in Babylonia: Three Sayings 2017 of Rav as a Diasporan Manifesto 101–121 Simcha Gross When the Jews Greeted Ali: Sherira Gaon’s Epistle in Light of Arabic and Syriac Historiography 122–144 Shalom Sadik When Maimonideans and Kabbalists Convert to Christianity 145–167 Abraham Rubin Jewish Self-Affirmation out of the Sources of Christian Supersessionism: Margarete Susman’s The Book of Job and the Fate of the Jewish People 168–193 Mohr Siebeck Meir Ben Shahar Shaʾanan College, Israel “A Future and a Hope” in Babylonia: Three Sayings of Rav as a Diasporan Manifesto* Abstract: The Jewish Diaspora is often viewed as the paradigm of exile, which implies longing for a place from which a people has been forcibly expelled. This article interprets three sayings by Rav in the Babylonian Talmud as reflecting an alternative ideology, in which living outside the Holy Land is not seen as regret- table or shameful, for God is revealed through the Jewish people’s observance of the Torah and the commandments everywhere. Although the relevant sugya in BT Ta’anit 29a–b opens with catastrophe – the destruction of the Temple – Rav’s three sayings here exude optimism, implying that a good life is attainable wherever Jews reside. Every moment of Torah study is the realization of the “future and hope” prom- ised by the prophet Jeremiah. Key words: Land of Israel, Babylonia, Diaspora, Exile, Rav. Introduction The prophet Jeremiah advised the Babylonian exiles: “Build houses and live in them, plant gardens and eat their fruit … And seek the welfare of the city to which I have exiled you, and pray to the Lord in its behalf; for in its prosperity you shall prosper” (Jer 29:5–7).
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac Polqar – a Jewish Philosopher Or a Philosopher and a Jew?
    Isaac Polqar – A Jewish Philosopher or a Philosopher and a Jew? A Study of the Relationship between Philosophy and Religion in Isaac Polqar’s ʿEzer ha-Dat [In Support of the Law] and Teshuvat Apikoros [A Response to the Heretic] A Thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Racheli Haliva Jewish Studies, McGill University, Montreal Supervisors: Carlos Fraenkel Lawrence J. Kaplan June 2015 © Copyright by Racheli Haliva 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgments..……………………………………………………………..…iv-vi Abstract-English…..…………………………………………………….………....vii-ix Abstract- French…………………………………………………………………... x-xii Introduction……………………………………………………………………..….1- 14 Chapter One: The Literary form of ‘Ezer ha-Dat: between Dialogue and Essay...15-64 Introduction…………………………………………………………….....……...15-25 Treatise One………………………………………………………..…………..…25-29 Treatise Two………………………………………………………………….…..29-44 Treatise Three………………………………………………………………….…44-50 Treatise Four………………………………………………………………….…..50-57 Treatise Five……………………………………………………………………....57-64 Chapter 2: Philosophy and Religion…………………………………………....…65-148 2.1 The Harmonious Relationship between Philosophy and Judaism………..…65-71 2.2 Judaism against Christianity……………………….……………………..…72-130 2.2.1 The Existence of God…………………………………………..…..85-87 2.2.2 Monotheism vs. Trinity………………………………………….....87-93 2.2.3 The Incorporeality of God vs. the Incarnation of God…………..…94-101 2.2.4 The World to Come: Is the Soul Universal or Individual ?..............101-105 2.2.5 The Messiah to Come vs. the Messiah Who Already Came……….105-114 2.2.6 The Exile and its Meaning…………………………………………115-127 2.2.7 The Authority of the Talmud and the Jewish Sages……….……....127-130 2.3 Jews and Non-Jews – Essential Superiority or Practical Difference?.............131-148 ii Chapter 3: The Conception of God………………………………………………..149-197 3.1 God’s Will………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Graeco-Arabica
    Studia graeco-arabica 9 _______ 2019 Editorial Board Mohammad Ali Amir Moezzi, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris Carmela Baffioni, Istituto Universitario Orientale, Napoli Sebastian Brock, Oriental Institute, Oxford Charles Burnett, The Warburg Institute, London Hans Daiber, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a. M. Cristina D’Ancona, Università di Pisa Thérèse-Anne Druart, The Catholic University of America, Washington Gerhard Endress, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Richard Goulet, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris Steven Harvey, Bar-Ilan University, Jerusalem Henri Hugonnard-Roche, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris Remke Kruk, Universiteit Leiden Concetta Luna, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa Alain-Philippe Segonds (†) Richard C. Taylor, Marquette University, Milwaukee (WI) Staff Elisa Coda, Cristina D’Ancona, Giulia Guidara, Issam Marjani, Cecilia Martini Bonadeo Submissions Submissions are invited in every area of the studies on the trasmission of philosophical and scientific texts from Classical Antiquity to the Middle Ages, Renaissance, and early modern times. Papers in English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish are published. Prospect authors are invited to check the Guidelines on the website of the journal, and to address their proposals to the Editor in chief. Peer Review Criteria Studia graeco-arabica follows a double-blind peer review process. Authors should avoid putting their names in headers or footers or refer to themselves in the body or notes of the article; the title and abstract alone should appear on the first page of the submitted article. All submitted articles are read by the editorial staff. Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review to at least one reviewer.
    [Show full text]