Original Articles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Original Articles 348 CLARK. G.M. ET AL. ORIGINAL ARTICLES MULTIPLE-CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANTS FOR CHILDREN: THE MELBOURNE PROGRAM CLARK, O.M., DAWSON, P.W., BLAMEY, P.I, DETTMAN, S.J., ROWLAND, L.C., BROWN,A.M., DOWELL, R.C., PYMAN, B.C., WEBB, R.L. Australian Bionic Ear and Hearing Research Institute, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Melbourne and Cochlear Implant Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne. Although there have been 300 years of deaf education, may be taught the Australian version of sign language of profoundly-totally deaf children today on average are not the deaf (Auslan). In the case of signed English, the signs able to reach the same level of achievement as their represent individual words as well as conveying grammatical normally hearing peers (Geers & Moog, 1989). This failure information such as tense. This form of signing is used in of deaf children to develop their true potential is largely total communication. and although it is difficult for due to the difficulty they have in communicating with children to attend to the speech signal by the auditory/oral normally hearing people. During the last 300 years there mode at the same time as signed English, they can develop have been basically two different methods of education the skills to communicate by either one used separately. used (The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1983). Firstly, In the case of the sign language of the deaf, the one which maximises auditory and lip reading cues grammatical structure is quite different from the structure (auditory/oral), advocated by Juan Pablo Bonet (1620), and of English. In practice, this method makes it difficult to one which uses a series of signs to convey meaning learn written language, and is not appropriate for (signing), developed by Charles-Michel (1712-89). In combining with an auditory/oral method of education. addition, there is a method which endeavours to combine As the multiple-channel cochlear implant provides both auditory/oral and signing approaches called total information by stimulating hearing sensations, it is communication. In practice, however, children taught by optimally used by combing these auditory signals with lip total communication tend to receive speech more reading cues. Consequently, children receiving a cochlear predominantly by one or other of these methods. implant should ideally be educated using an auditory/oral Within the two main methods are variations. For method. example, with the auditory/oral system some educators prefer to teach by combining auditory information with lip reading cues while others endeavour to get children to Management Team develop their listening skills by withholding visual information (the auditory/verbal method). A further In managing a child for a cochlear implant we consider variation of the auditory/oral method is to use cueing that a team approach is essential. The management team supplements. In this situation the child is helped by is outlined in Figure l. The team consists of otologists, providing additional visual cues when speech sounds look audiologists, speech pathologists, educators of the deaf, the same on the lips. There are also different approaches and consultants in psychology, child psychiatry and social to training with the auditory/oral schemes. On the one hand, educators may emphasize training in listening to segments of speech and speaking in very structured - Otologists situations. On the other hand, they may emphasize learning conversational speech in more natural and unstructured - Audiologists ways similar to that which would occur with normally - Speech pathologists hearing children. - Educators of the deaf In the case of signing there are basically two different - Consultants systems: children may be taught signed English, or, they - Psychologists - Child psychiatrists Correspondence: - Social workers Professor Graeme M. Clark, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, FIG. 1. Management team personnel; cochlear implants for children. 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne. Victoria 3002 J. 01OLARYNG. soc. AUSTRAL.. JANUARY 1991, 6. No.5 !i!!!!l'I .... ,......,----­ -~ CLARK, G.M. ET AL. 349 work. The team also requires a leader who is co!1versant establishing the hearing threshold levels and determining with most aspects of the program. Furthermore, there is how effective the hearing aids are. Establishing the hearing a need for very good liaison between members of the team thresholds in very young children is facilitated by using a based in a hospital and the teachers in the school. The team steady state evoked response (SSEP) technique we have is responsible for the following areas in a cochlear implant developed in the Department of Otolaryngology (Rickards child's management: preoperative evaluation and selection; & Clark, 1984). This technique involves presenting parent counselling; surgery; auditory training in speech amplitude modulated (AM) and/or frequency modulated production, language and auditory perception and (FM) sounds with different carrier frequencies. A Fourier audiological assessment. These responsibilities are listed analysis is carried out on the evoked responses, and in Figure 2. objective criteria are set for establishing thresholds at each caI'Tier frequency. The thresholds are specific for the regions excited by the carrier frequencies. It is an especially useful procedure in measuring the thresholds for low frequencies - Preoperative evaluation and which can still be present when the high frequencies are selection lost. Assessing hearing thresholds at low frequencies is - Parent counselling difficult with standard ABR techniques, but can be successfully carried out using the SSEP procedure referred -Surgery to above. - Auditory training In stages 3 and 4, we assess all aspects of a child's ability - Audiological assessment to communicate. This means assessing speech perception, speech production, language skills and pragmatics (their ability to converse). Following this speech and language assessment, the FlG. 2. Management team - responsibilities: cochlear implants jar children undergo a preoperative training program so they children. can learn to use any residual hearing. This program also gets them used to the auditory/oral training they will receive when they get an implant. Preoperative Evaluation and Selection Finally, the assessment of the child is reviewed by the management team and ethics committee before The preoperative evaluation and selection process takes implantation. place in five stages. At any stage a child may be considered unsuitable for an implant, and may be referred for an alternative sensory aid. The stages are shown in Figure 3. Parent Guidance SI8ge 1: Initial assessment We would like to emphasize that, preoperatively and Hisiory (pmllmlnary) Audlomolry postoperatively, the parents need counselling. This help ~ includes information on the procedure and discussion of Siage 2: AkdlCIIIllnve.llgatlons HI.tory (""ta/Ied) their emotions during both the preoperative and Physical examInation Radiology postoperative periods. The clinician has a responsibility to PromonlQfy sUmulatlon .......r.!!-­ address with the parent such issues as the potential and Stage 3: AudJDIOfjlcaJ evaluations limitations of the device, the range of results obtained with E=:~:::'::':::i:S ~ Speech percepllon ttnlting Preoperative training. children who currently have the implant, the importance _~ Family support, Stage 4: SpeeCh and I8nguage evaluation, EducBti()(UIllia/son of factors such as motivation (the child's and their own), Speech production ......:::t:J- and the effect of age at onset of deafness and current Language Pragmatic behaviour development of speech and language on the child's Stage 5:-""- Clinical review prognosis. Time is needed to help the parents understand --J!!!!I"'~ SUrgery and accept the effects of implantation. The time available PoatopIJrativs management before the operation is a valuable time for developing FIG. 3. Preoperative evaluation and selection; cochlear implantsjor rapport with the parent. children. Parents are also encouraged to have contact with parents of children who have already received the implant. This The first stage consists of an initial medical assessment, is accomplished through the Parents' Support Group which audiometric testing of hearing thresholds, and general meets on a six-weekly basis. This forum allows parents to counselling to ensure that the parents' expectations are develop friendships and sources of information: valuable realistic. support in times of need. Luterman (1979, 1984) notes that The second stage consists of a detailed clinical history the most valuable service a professional can give a parent and examination. We pay particular attention to middle ear is to put them in touch with other parents. The parents infections, as susceptibility to infection may delay or themselves recognise the value of sharing experiences and prevent implantation. A CT scan is carried out under emotions, and supporting each other. anaesthesia for young children. Electrical stimulation of An important component of the preoperative period is the promonotory is only done for children 10 years and preparing the child for the operation. The parents may be above. reluctant to talk with their child about the operation, In stage 3, the audiological assessment aims at fearing the child may become anxious about the events. J. OTOLARYNG. soc. AUSTRAL., JANUARY 1991, 6, No.5 350 CLARK, GS1. ET At. They need to be encouraged to discuss the events
Recommended publications
  • (Sasl) in a Bilingual-Bicultural Approach in Education of the Deaf
    APPLICATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN SIGN LANGUAGE (SASL) IN A BILINGUAL-BICULTURAL APPROACH IN EDUCATION OF THE DEAF Philemon Abiud Okinyi Akach August 2010 APPLICATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN SIGN LANGUAGE (SASL) IN A BILINGUAL-BICULTURAL APPROACH IN EDUCATION OF THE DEAF By Philemon Abiud Omondi Akach Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in the FACULTY OF HUMANITIES (DEPARTMENT OF AFROASIATIC STUDIES, SIGN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE PRACTICE) at the UNIVERSITY OF FREE STATE Promoter: Dr. Annalie Lotriet. Co-promoter: Dr. Debra Aarons. August 2010 Declaration I declare that this thesis, which is submitted to the University of Free State for the degree Philosophiae Doctor, is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me to another university or faculty. I hereby cede the copyright of the thesis to the University of Free State Philemon A.O. Akach. Date. To the deaf children of the continent of Africa; may you grow up using the mother tongue you don’t acquire from your mother? Acknowledgements I would like to say thank you to the University of the Free State for opening its doors to a doubly marginalized language; South African Sign Language to develop and grow not only an academic subject but as the fastest growing language learning area. Many thanks to my supervisors Dr. A. Lotriet and Dr. D. Aarons for guiding me throughout this study. My colleagues in the department of Afroasiatic Studies, Sign Language and Language Practice for their support. Thanks to my wife Wilkister Aluoch and children Sophie, Susan, Sylvia and Samuel for affording me space to be able to spend time on this study.
    [Show full text]
  • 21. Bibliografía
    BIBLIOGRAFÍA1121 A) Material impreso y/o digitalizado Abergel, R. (s. d.): L’enfant sourd et la psychomôtricite. Hommage à Pereire. Mémoire présenté en vue de l’obtention du Certificat de capacité d‘orthophoniste (Memoria no publicada pre- sentada para la obtención del certificado de capacidad de ortofonista. Universidad Louis Pasteur. Facultad de Medicina. Strasbourg). Acquier, Marie-Laure (2000): «Los Tratados en prosa de Antonio López de Vega: aproxima- ción al discurso político en el siglo XVII», Cuadernos de Historia Moderna, n.º 24, 11-31, pp. 85-106. Aftonio, Elio Festo (1961): De metris, en H. Keil (ed.): Grammatici Latini, vol. VI, Hildes- heim, Olms; reimpr de la. 1.ª ed. de Leipzig, 1874, pp. 31-173. Aguado Díaz, A. L. (1995): Historia de las Deficiencias, Madrid, Escuela Libre Editorial (Col. Tesis y Praxis). Aguirre Lora, G. M. E. (dir./1993): Juan Amós Comenio: obra, andanzas, atmosferas en el IV centenario de su nacimiento. (1592-1992), Coyoacán, Centro de Estudios sobre la Universidad. Agulló y Cobo, Mercedes (1992): La imprenta y el comercio de libros en Madrid (siglos XVI- XVIII), Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ainscow, M. (2001): Desarrollo de escuelas inclusivas. Ideas propuestas y experiencias para mejorar las instituciones escolares, Madrid, Narcea. Alcuino de York (1851): Grammatica, en Frobenius (ed.): Opera omnia, en J.-P. Migne: Patro- logia Latina, vol. CI, Turnholti, Brepols, reimpr.de la 1.ª ed. de París, 1777, cols. 849-902. Aldea Vaquero, Quintín de (1986): España y Europa en el siglo XVII. Correspondencia de Saavedra Faxardo. 1631-1633, Madrid, CSIC. Alemán, Mateo (1609): Ortografía castellana, México, Jerónimo Balli.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Hundred Years' War in Deaf Education
    THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/146075 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2020-04-15 and may be subject to change. THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS* WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy EEN WETENSCHAPPELIJKE PROEVE OP HET GEBIED VAN DE SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR AAN DE KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT NIJMEGEN, VOLGENS BESLUIT VAN HET COLLEGE VAN DECANEN IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP 5 DECEMBER 1995 DES NAMIDDAGS TE 3.30 UUR PRECIES DOOR AGNES ELIZABETH JACOBA MARIA TELLINGS GEBOREN OP 9 APRIL 1954 TE ROOSENDAAL Dit onderzoek werd verricht met behulp van subsidie van de voormalige Stichting Pedon, NWO Mediagroep Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen PROMOTOR: Prof.Dr. A.W. van Haaften COPROMOTOR: Dr. G.L.M. Snik 1 PREFACE The methods controversy in deaf education has fascinated me since I visited the International Congress on Education of the Deaf in Hamburg (Germany) in 1980. There I was struck by the intemperate emotions by which the methods controversy is attended. This book is an attempt to understand what this controversy really is about I would like to thank first and foremost Prof.Wouter van Haaften and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf History Notes Unit 1.Pdf
    Deaf History Notes by Brian Cerney, Ph.D. 2 Deaf History Notes Table of Contents 5 Preface 6 UNIT ONE - The Origins of American Sign Language 8 Section 1: Communication & Language 8 Communication 9 The Four Components of Communication 11 Modes of Expressing and Perceiving Communication 13 Language Versus Communication 14 The Three Language Channels 14 Multiple Language Encoding Systems 15 Identifying Communication as Language – The Case for ASL 16 ASL is Not a Universal Language 18 Section 2: Deaf Education & Language Stability 18 Pedro Ponce DeLeón and Private Education for Deaf Children 19 Abbé de l'Epée and Public Education for Deaf Children 20 Abbé Sicard and Jean Massieu 21 Laurent Clerc and Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet 23 Martha's Vineyard 24 The Connecticut Asylum for the Education and Instruction of Deaf and Dumb Persons 27 Unit One Summary & Review Questions 30 Unit One Bibliography & Suggested Readings 32 UNIT TWO - Manualism & the Fight for Self-Empowerment 34 Section 1: Language, Culture & Oppression 34 Language and Culture 35 The Power of Labels 35 Internalized Oppression 37 Section 2: Manualism Versus Oralism 37 The New England Gallaudet Association 37 The American Annals of the Deaf 38 Edward Miner Gallaudet, the Columbia Institution for the Instruction of the Deaf and Dumb, and the National Deaf-Mute College 39 Alexander Graham Bell and the American Association to Promote the Teaching of Speech to the Deaf 40 The National Association of the Deaf 42 The International Convention of Instructors of the Deaf in Milan, Italy 44
    [Show full text]
  • Iffls G E M M E U . IW EB17J8S3
    A M icroanalysis o f the Nonmanual Components of Questions in American Sign Language By Charlotte Lee Baker-Shenk B.S. (Clark U niversity) 1972 M.A. O Jniversity o f C alifornia) 1975 C.Phil. (University of California) 1978 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Approved: Date IfflSGEMMEU . IWEB17J8S3 \ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A Microanalysis of the Nonmanual Components of Questions in American Sign Language C opyright © 1983 by Charlotte Lee Baker-Shenk Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ....................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements .................................................................................. v ii List of Figures .................................................................................... x List of Photographs ..................................... x ii List of Drawings .......................................................................................x i i i Transcription Conventions .................................................... iv C hapter I - EXPERIENCES OF DEAF PEOPLE IN A HEARING WORLD ................................................. 1 1.0 Formal education of deaf people: historical review •• 1 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Education for Deaf People
    1 Chapter 2: The development of education for deaf people The development of education for deaf people Legacy of the Past The book Legacy of the Past (Some aspects of the history of blind educa- tion, deaf education, and deaf-blind education with emphasis on the time before 1900) contains three chapters: Chapter 1: The development of education for blind people Chapter 2: The development of education for deaf people Chapter 3: The development of education for deaf-blind people In all 399 pp. An internet edition of the whole book in one single document would be very unhandy. Therefore, I have divided the book into three documents (three inter- netbooks). In all, the three documents contain the whole book. Legacy of the Past. This Internetbook is Chapter 2: The development of education for deaf people. Foreword In his Introduction the author expresses very clearly that this book is not The history of blind education, deaf education and deaf-blind education but some aspects of their history of education with emphasis on the time before 1900. Nevertheless - having had the privilege of reading it - my opinion is that this volume must be one of the most extensive on the market today regarding this part of the history of special education. For several years now I have had the great pleasure of working with the author, and I am not surprised by the fact that he really has gone to the basic sources trying to find the right answers and perspectives. Who are they - and in what ways have societies during the centuries faced the problems? By going back to ancient sources like the Bible, the Holy Koran and to Nordic Myths the author gives the reader an exciting perspective; expressed, among other things, by a discussion of terms used through our history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Deaf Women in Society: an Investigative Report
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program Spring 2020 The Challenges of Deaf Women in Society: An Investigative Report Megan Harris Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Disability Studies Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Megan, "The Challenges of Deaf Women in Society: An Investigative Report" (2020). Honors Theses. 772. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/772 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SENIOR THESIS APPROVAL This Honors thesis entitled “The Challenges of Deaf Women in Society: an Investigative Report” written by Megan Harris and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the Carl Goodson Honors Program meets the criteria for acceptance and has been approved by the undersigned readers. __________________________________ Mrs. Carol Morgan, thesis director __________________________________ Dr. Kevin Motl, second reader __________________________________ Dr. Benjamin Utter, third reader __________________________________ Dr. Barbara Pemberton, Honors Program director June 5, 2020 THE CHALLENGES OF DEAF WOMEN IN SOCIETY 2 The Challenges of Deaf Women in Society: An Investigative Report Megan Harris Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders Ouachita Baptist University Mrs. Carol Morgan HNRS 4982: Honors Thesis THE CHALLENGES OF DEAF WOMEN IN SOCIETY 3 Abstract History has recorded the mistreatment of both Deaf people and women across time and cultures. The discrimination, struggle for rights, and the strides of progress thus far are congruent themes in both narratives, but neither expressly acknowledges the experiences of Deaf women, who encounter prejudice for both labels.
    [Show full text]
  • Fingerspelling Dac·Ty·Lol·O·Gy [Dak-Tuh-Lol-Uh-Jee] Noun, Plural Dac·Ty·Lol·O·Gies
    fingerspelling dac·ty·lol·o·gy [dak-tuh-lol-uh-jee] noun, plural dac·ty·lol·o·gies. the technique of communicating by signs made with the fingers, especially in the manual alphabets used by the deaf. what is it? Fingerspelling is the manual alphabet used in American Sign Language and is performed using a variety of hand gestures. It is mainly used for spelling out names, people, places and things that don't have their own unique sign. It also is commonly used for spelling out titles of books and movies, as well as signing the brand name of various items. how do I do it? Letters are signed with the dominant hand and generally with the palm facing the viewer. When fingerspelling, the hand should be at shoulder height. Letters are signed at a constant speed with a pause functioning as a word divider. To indicate the same letter twice in a row the signer will bounce the signed letter. The first letter may be held for the length of an extra letter as a cue that the signer is about to start fingerspelling. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 10 www.healthyhearing.com fun facts Fingerspelling makes up American fingerspelling 8.7% is composed of of casual signing in ASL! Americans actually utilize fingerspelling in their manual communication more one-hand gestures to than any other country. represent 26 letters. British fingerspelling uses both hands to form each letter. Japan has the most extensive The expression fingerspelling with i love you also can be communicated with one hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Described in This Paper Centers Around Inservice Training and Which Serve
    ri-1447, 1! , DOCUMENT RESUME ;.. ED 314 893 EC 222 036 AUTHOR Stewart, David A.; And Others TITLE Consistent Linguistic Input in the Signing Behavior of Teachers: Modified Signed English. Occasional Paper. No. 127. INSTITUTION Michigan State Univ., East Lansing. Inst. for Research on Teaching. SPONS AGENCY Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. PUB DATE Jul 89 GRANT G008730145 NOTE 114p. AVAILABLE FROM Institute for Research on Teaching, College of Education, Michigan State University, 252 Erickson Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824 ($11.00). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) - - Information Analyses (070) -- Reference Materials - Vocabularies/Classifications/Dictionaries (134) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Sign Language; *Communication Skills; *Deafness; Demonstration Programs; Elementary Secondary Education; Finger Spelling; Hearing Impairments; *Inservice Teacher Education; Lesson Plans; Special Classes; *Total Communication IDENTIFIERS *Signed English ABSTRACT The paper addresses problems teachers of the severely hearing impaired have in being bimodal (speech plus signs) English role models as well as in using American Sign Language. Theproject described in this paper centers around inservice training and in-class demonstrations of the use of a modified form of Signed English to provide a visual presentation ol7 Engli5has the primary language of the classroom. The typical signing behavior of teachers in total communication programs is illustrated through examplesfrom a videotape. The major portion of the document consists of appendixes which serve as a manual for implementing a similar approach. Appendix A lists the 12 general goals of the Total Communication Project Appendix B presents eight inservice lesson plans concernedwith:(1) sign markers, affixes, and contractions;(2) facial (-p:pressions and body language; (3) body and gaze shifting; (4) fingetspellirig; (5) classifiers;(6) locatives; (7) indexic referencing and lo,'Jalization; and (8) directionality.
    [Show full text]
  • (FEEC/UNICAMP) José Mario De Martino (FEEC/UNICAMP) Schedule
    Janice Gonçalves Temoteo Marques (FCM/UNICAMP) Lucas Vieira de Miranda (FEEC/UNICAMP) José Mario De Martino (FEEC/UNICAMP) Schedule ● Deaf Education Timeline ● Problem ● Methodology ● Results ● Conclusions ● Future Work Deaf Education Timeline (World) Juan Pablo Bonet (1579 - 1629 CE) First person to use manual alphabet and sign language as a tool to teach deaf people to speak, read and write. The first advocate of oral education. 1 Deaf Education Timeline (World) Juan Pablo Bonet Charles-Michel de l’Épée (1579 - 1629 CE) (1712 - 1789 CE) First person to use The founder of the first school for manual alphabet and sign deaf people, the National Institute language as a tool to for Deaf Children of Paris. The teach deaf people to first place in the world where deaf speak, read and write. people were educated using their The first advocate of oral natural language, Sign education. Language. Oral language was considered the second language (reading and writing). 1 Deaf Education Timeline (World) Juan Pablo Bonet Charles-Michel de l’Épée Thomas Hopkins (1579 - 1629 CE) (1712 - 1789 CE) Gallaudet (1787 - 1851 CE) First person to use The founder of the first school for manual alphabet and sign deaf people, the National Institute Traveled to France to language as a tool to for Deaf Children of Paris. The learn the method teach deaf people to first place in the world where deaf developed by Charles- speak, read and write. people were educated using their Michel de l'Épée. He is The first advocate of oral natural language, Sign the founder of the first education.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Connections and Global Conversations: Deafness and Education in and Beyond the British Empire, Ca
    This is a repository copy of Deaf Connections and Global Conversations: Deafness and education in and beyond the British Empire, ca. 1800-1900. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/90897/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Cleall, E. (2015) Deaf Connections and Global Conversations: Deafness and education in and beyond the British Empire, ca. 1800-1900. Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2015.0006 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Deaf connections and global conversations: deafness and education in and beyond the British Empire, c. 1800-19001 In the early 1850s George Tait, docked in Jamaica on the way to the US where he intended to seek his fortune.i Tait had recently left the Edinburgh Deaf and Dumb Institution and was eager to travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Controversy in Deaf Education
    Communication Controversy in Deaf Education Presentation by: Irene Tunanidas, M.Ed., M.S. Retired Deaf Educator, Deaf Advocate, Tutor Speech interpreted by: Karen Steed, Librarian Poland Branch Library Painting Credit: Nancy Rourke May 10, 2019 3-26-2019 History of Deaf Education The history of deaf education dates back to ancient Greece where the deaf were harshly oppressed and were denied fundamental rights such as: not permitted to own a property or marry. They were considered a burden to society and were sent to a sanitarium or put to the mountains to die. (Winefield, 1987) Aristotle’s Perspective of Deaf Children Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), ancient Greek philosopher, spent considerable time interacting with deaf children in Greece and determined that those born deaf were incapable of speech and reasoning. His words echoed throughout Europe until the 1500s. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Aristotle Aristotle Definitions of Deafness Hard-of-Hearing – refers to persons who experience a slight to moderate hearing loss. Although some may be able to understand speech, they may be prevented from conversing with those who are soft-spoken, and may be prevented from comprehending messages expressed over the telephone. Deaf – In 1972 the term “Deaf” began appearing in the literature pertaining to deafness. During that time, James Woodward proposed the idea that the word, “deaf” be capitalized when referring to a particular group of people who share a language – American Sign Language (ASL) and a culture. deaf – Audiologists use the term “deaf” to identify individuals who have varying degrees of hearing loss. This medical term means the individual’s hearing needs to be “fixed” through hearing devices https://lhac.com/hearing-loss/ such as: hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    [Show full text]