Outlet Centres in Europe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor. -
2019 Annual Report Annual 2019
a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129. -
Outlet Centres in Europe
MARKET SURVEY March 2021 Outlet Centres in Europe Market Survey covering all operating and planned Outlet Centres in the European Countries Study within the Scope of ecostra’s Basic Research understanding markets | evaluating risks | discovering chances Preliminary remarks Beginning in the USA and, over the past 25 years, subsequently spreading in Europe as well, a new retail format has been established: the Factory Outlet Centre (FOC) or Designer Outlet Centre (DOC). In the meantime, such a high density of Outlet Centres already exists in some European countries (e.g. Great Britain), that one can certainly speak of market saturation here. Thus, in Great Britain, as in the USA also, a market shakeout is observable among locations of Outlet Centres, whereby the most professional operators, and accordingly suitable locations, win out over less productive concepts or locations with weaknesses. The situation in continental Europe is somehow different. Due what are, to date, extremely restrictive building permission procedures compared to those in the rest of Europe, Germany has only a very few Outlet Centres in relation to the size of this national market. However, there is little doubt that this will change in the medium-term perspective, at least. The kind of emotional argument that often used to take place until just a few years ago has now given way to a much more factual discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of establishing an Outlet Centre. Whereas Germany still shows a lot of potential for new Outlet Centres, Italy has seen a rapid development in the last years, and it’s difficult to discover any “white spots” on the map there. -
Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) May 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport ...................................................................................................... -
Transport and Logistics in Croatia Flanders Investment & Trade Market Survey
TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA September 2016 Yazmin Valleyo Sarmiento, Ivan Vandija, Marija Grsetic Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 CROATIA OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Economic Environment Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Croatian Economic Environment SWOT Analysis ......................................................................................................... 12 Croatia SWOT ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 CROATIAN TRANSPORT SECTOR ....................................................................................................................................................14 Introduction to the Transport Sector in Croatia ......................................................................................................... -
Adriatic-Ionian Corridor: a Corridor Linking Two Macro-Regions
European Union The EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1b: To improve mobility and Multimodality – road, rail and air links S2: Towards Improved Mobility and Connectivity Adriatic-Ionian Corridor: a corridor linking two macro-regions Franc Žepič, PAC 1b Ministry of Infrastructure, Slovenia 4th Stakeholder Conference The DANUBE REGION TRANSPORT DAYS, 4-5 December 2018 | Hotel SLON, Ljubljana, Slovenia 1 Co-financed by the EU (ERDF and IPA) The Danube Region ... EUSDR – Communication and Action Plan: - 8 December 2010: adopted by the European Commission -¸24 June 2011: endorsed by the European Council! EUSDR - 11 (12) Priority areas PA 1: To improve Mobility and Multimodality VPA 1a: inland waterways - Austria and Romania VPA 1b : rail, road and air links - Slovenia and Serbia 14 States: Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Moldova, Ukraine Population: 115 million (EU28: 512, incl. UK 66 mio) Area: 1,092.591 km2 (EU28: 4,475,757) 2 European Union TEN-T CNC crossing the Danube macro-region 1. Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor ( FI, SE, DK, DE, AT , TEN-T (Reg. 1315/2013 on TEN-T and Reg. 1316/2013 on CEF) IT, MT ) – Mr. Pat Cox (IE); Since 12 March 2014 CNCs, including indicative extensions to the Western Balkans 2. Baltic-Adriatic Corridor ( PL, SK, CZ, AT, SI, IT ) – Mr Kurt Bodewig (DE); Since 12.3.2014 and Ms Anne Elisabeth Jensen (DK); Since 16 September 2018 3. Orient/East-Med Corridor (DE, CZ, SK, AT, HU, RO, BG, GR, CY ) – Mr. Mathieu Grosch (BE); 1 July 2014 4. -
Ppp Report 2009
EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: CONTENTS The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. The Report is in three main sections. The first provides an overview of the current state of the European market and our Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. perspectives on future directions. Section 2 contains the country sections. Section 3 contains project lists derived from the Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Infra-News database. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SERBIA 96 Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for VIEW FROM SERBIA 97 SECTION 1 assistance with the report on Portugal. SLOVAKIA 98 THE FUTURE DIRECTION 5 VIEW FROM SLOVAKIA 100 Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. SLOVENIA 101 VIEW FROM EIB 9 SPAIN 103 Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. CURRENT LOCATION 13 SWEDEN 107 VIEW FROM SWEDEN 108 All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, VIEW FROM FRANCE 16 TURKEY 109 Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. VIEW FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM 17 VIEW FROM TURKEY 111 VIEW FROM GERMANY 20 UKRAINE 112 SECTION 2 UNITED KINGDOM 116 COUNTRY SECTIONS SECTION 3 AUSTRIA 25 ProJect Lists BELGIUM 27 AUSTRIA 123 Production of Report and Copyright BULGARIA 29 BELGIUM 127 VIEW FROM BULGARIA 30 BULGARIA 135 This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. -
TR-DEVLP STRAT-DOC 3010-14 ANNEX 2 FINAL 25-12 15.Pdf
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA'S i TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY INDEX OF CONTENTS 1. RAIL SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Rail transport structure in the Republic of Croatia ................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Croatian rail network ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.3. Present condition of the infrastructure ................................................................................. 5 1.1.4. Rail transport in Croatia ......................................................................................................... 8 1.2. List of hypothesis ....................................................................................................................15 1.3. SWOT Rail sector .....................................................................................................................17 2. ROAD SECTOR ................................................................................................................ 18 2.1. Analysis ...................................................................................................................................18 2.1.1. Croatia in the European Union ............................................................................................ -
Connectivity Agenda in the Western Balkans: a Snapshot
The Connectivity Agenda in the Western Balkans: A snapshot Briefing Aprill 2020 CONTENTS: Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 2 2. The Connectivity Agenda and its main financing instruments 2 2.1. Western Balkans Investment Framework (WBIF) 3 3. Connectivity and infrastructure in the Western Balkans 3 3.1. Albania 4 3.2. Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) 5 3.3. Kosovo 6 3.4. Montenegro 7 3.5. North Macedonia 8 3.6. Serbia 9 4. Conclusion 10 Notes 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Regional cooperation is one of the key components of preparing the Western Balkans (WB) for the European Union (EU) enlargement process. The Berlin Process was launched in 2014 by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel to facilitate this coopera- tion, among others aiming to improve connectivity both within the WB countries and between the WB and the EU. The ultimate goal of which is to improve living standards and quality of life for the citizens. This mutual commitment by the WB countries and EU has been further strengthened through the EU Connectivity Agenda for the WB (launched in 2015), a combination of political commitment and monetary funds to strengthen the transport and energy sectors. Since the Berlin Process, several projects were undertaken or are currently underway. Until 2019, the Agenda supported 39 projects with an investment value of EUR 3.2 billion, grant value of EUR 880 million and EUR 97 million on technical assis- tance for project preparation. However, all WB countries lag behind in both sectors in comparison to EU members’ states. Key challenges identified include low operation and administrative capacity, limited progress and investment in renewable energy options, old infrastructure to demand for higher monitoring and cooperation. -
TRT Proposal
TRANSPORT STUDY FOR THE DANUBE MACRO-REGION Final Report Study prepared for: EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK TRT Trasporti e Territorio Milan, 30 June 2017 Transport Study for the Danube Macro-Region – Final Report Document Control Sheet Customer European Investment Bank Contract Number CC8414/PO92839 Project name Transport Study for the Danube Macro-Region File name EIB Transport Study for the Danube Macro-Region – Final Report D5 Version Date 30/04/2019 Document classification Draft Final X Confidential X Restricted X Public Main editor Silvia Maffii and Marco Brambilla Angelo Martino, Marco Pascucci, Ernesto Marzano, Zoltan Gati, Contributors Drazenko Glavic, Fabio Torta, Riccardo Parolin, Claudia de Stasio, Luca Bellodi, Eglantina Dani, Loredana Zani and Dorota Bielanska Final approval Silvia Maffii Available to European Investment Bank Assignment Manager Contact Dr. Silvia Maffii TRT Trasporti e Territorio Via Rutilia 10/8 Milano - Italy Tel: +39 02 57410380 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.trt.it ii Transport Study for the Danube Macro-Region – Final Report LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACROSSEE Accessibility Improved at Border Crossing for the Integration of South East Europe AADT Average Annual Traffic per Day ANSP Air Navigation Service Provider ASFINAG Autobahnen - und Schnellstraßen-Finanzierungs - Aktiengesellschaft ATC Air Traffic Control ATM Air Traffic Management B/C Benefit Cost ratio BVWP Bundesverkehrswegeplan CCNR Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine CEF Connecting Europe Facility CO2 Carbon Dioxide DARS Družbe za avtoceste -
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment The Study on Roads in the Danube region was prepared by the consultant Sloman Company for Consulting & Engineering Ltd.. It is based on internet research, personal experience and two questionnaires. Thanks to the kind contribution of PA1b Steering Group members, without whose commitment and input to this study, many national data would not have been possible to collect. Special gratitude goes to: - Mr. Josef Zitzler, Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology, Austria - Mr. Miroslav Đerić, Ministry of Communications and Transport, Bosna & Hercegovina - Mr. Petar Benov, Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, Bulgaria - Ms. Leona Fronková, Ministry of Transport, The Czech Republic - Mr. Kristijan Ležaić and Mr. Mr. Saša Amanović, Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure, Croatia - Mr. Harry Seybert, the Bavarian Ministry of the Interior, Building and Transport, Bayern, Germany - Mrs. Rosa Flaig, Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, Baden-Württemberg, Germany - Mr. Gergely Gecse, Ministry of National Development, Department of Railway Infrastructure, Hungary - Ms Tatiana Buzovschi, Ministry of Economy and Infrastracture, Road Infrastructure Department, Moldova - Ms Tanja Dasić and Ms Hanja Dedijer, Ministry of transport and Maritime Affairs, Montenegro - Mr. Serban Robert Tupa, Ministry of Transport, Romania - Mr. Miodrag Poledica and Ms Mirjana Jovanović, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, Serbia - Mr. Pavol Bžán and Mr. Ján Šesták, Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development, Slovakia - Mr. Tomaž Willenpart and Mr. Anton Švigelj, Ministry of Infrastructure, Slovenian Infrastructure Agency and Ms. Helena Jarc, DARS d.d., Slovenia - Ms Yana Remeniuk, Ministry of Infrastructure, Ukraine Sincere thanks go also to all other national experts from the Danube region countries responsible for monitoring of roads who provided valuable input into the preparation of this publication. -
TEN-T Progress Report 2010
Progress Report 2010 TEN-T Trans-European Transport Network Implementation of the Priority Projects June 2010 TEN-T Priority Projects – Progress Report 2010 Information contained in this report summarises the current state of play regarding the develop- ment of the Priority Projects, including the sources of financing. It was assembled with the data provided by the Member States by using the online iReport module of the TENtec Information System of the Directorate General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE). Each Member State provided information for the sections of the Priority Projects located on its territory, whereas the cross-border sections were reported on jointly by the countries involved. In addition, the European Investment Bank provided information on the loans given to Priority Projects and the European Commission added the figures reflecting the grant allocation to individual sections. This information was subse- quently revised and, in some cases, altered by the Member States. Despite the attention given to the quality and reliability of the data, some figures, especially on the sources of financing, may be missing. It should also be noted that the data for the program- ming period 2007-2013 and beyond reflects intentions and plans of the Member States. In particu- lar, estimates of investment on TEN-T Priority Projects from Cohesion Policy funds are at this stage indicative. Information received may therefore naturally evolve in the future. The completeness of the information gathered in the tables will be gradually improved in the future through an ongoing cooperation with Member States’ authorities. The report includes statistical information on 30 TEN-T Priority Projects, including the new integrated PP15 (Galileo) and PP21 (Motorways of the Sea).