DOCSLIB.ORG

Acknowledgment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Acknowledgment The Study on Roads in the Danube region was prepared by the consultant Sloman Company for Consulting & Engineering Ltd.. It is based on internet research, personal experience and two questionnaires. Thanks to the kind contribution of PA1b Steering Group members, without whose commitment and input to this study, many national data would not have been possible to collect. Special gratitude goes to: - Mr. Josef Zitzler, Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology, Austria - Mr. Miroslav Đerić, Ministry of Communications and Transport, Bosna & Hercegovina - Mr. Petar Benov, Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, Bulgaria - Ms. Leona Fronková, Ministry of Transport, The Czech Republic - Mr. Kristijan Ležaić and Mr. Mr. Saša Amanović, Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure, Croatia - Mr. Harry Seybert, the Bavarian Ministry of the Interior, Building and Transport, Bayern, Germany - Mrs. Rosa Flaig, Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, Baden-Württemberg, Germany - Mr. Gergely Gecse, Ministry of National Development, Department of Railway Infrastructure, Hungary - Ms Tatiana Buzovschi, Ministry of Economy and Infrastracture, Road Infrastructure Department, Moldova - Ms Tanja Dasić and Ms Hanja Dedijer, Ministry of transport and Maritime Affairs, Montenegro - Mr. Serban Robert Tupa, Ministry of Transport, Romania - Mr. Miodrag Poledica and Ms Mirjana Jovanović, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, Serbia - Mr. Pavol Bžán and Mr. Ján Šesták, Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development, Slovakia - Mr. Tomaž Willenpart and Mr. Anton Švigelj, Ministry of Infrastructure, Slovenian Infrastructure Agency and Ms. Helena Jarc, DARS d.d., Slovenia - Ms Yana Remeniuk, Ministry of Infrastructure, Ukraine Sincere thanks go also to all other national experts from the Danube region countries responsible for monitoring of roads who provided valuable input into the preparation of this publication. 1 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the EUSDR PA1b by the SLOMAN ltd. task group: Slovenko Henigman, Metod Di Batista, Luka Matjaž, Robert Mihelčič, Uroš Košir and Mateja Mikložič. The report content reflects the views of the author and not necessarily those of the PA1b coordinators and Steering group members. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Author: This document is prepared by the SLOMAN, Company for Consulting & Engineering, Ltd, Slovenia. Place and Date: Ljubljana, March 2018 2 PREFACE Dear Reader, We are pleased to share with you the first brochure dedicated to roads in the Danube region, which features overview of present road infrastructure. Transport generates unusually considerable economic advantages. The most obvious are the saving of time, the cost cutting of transport, the extension of the area of influence for doing business and leisure activities. Road transport is major transport mode since its share represents roughly 75% - 80 % of all transport. Forecasts are indicating that traffic on our roads will continue to grow across the short, medium and long term. Therefore, it is essential that we continue to develop road infrastructure, with particular focus on maintenance, construction of missing links, enhanced traffic flows by building smart motorway network and on modernization of secondary and tertiary networks. The purpose of this brochure is to better understand and to present state of play of the Roads in the Danube region. The ability to make overview of roads in the 14 Danube region countries and an effort made to compare them on a variety of indicators should help to assess gaps between countries and agree on future joint activities to address the most challenging issues. At the same time, it can be used for further discussions and policy developments related to the road infrastructure at macro- regional, regional, national and local level hence make long-lasting contributions to improvement of roads and consequently to more efficient mobility of peoples and goods. It is hoped that this report will trigger further research on the Danube region roads and will lead to improved and more accurate next version of the publication concerning our roads. We wish you a pleasant reading. EUSDR Priority Area 1b coordinators: Franc Žepič, Ministry of Infrastructure, Slovenia and Miodrag Poledica, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, Serbia 1 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 ROADS IN THE DANUBE REGION ............................................................................................... 6 1.1 THE DANUBE MACRO-REGION ........................................................................................... 6 1.2 ROADS IN THE DANUBE MACRO-REGION ........................................................................ 7 1.2.1 Early roads: Roman road system and the Danube region ...................................... 8 1.2.2 Modern Roads ................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.3 E-Road network ........................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4 UNECE - Trans-European Motorways (TEM) Project ............................................. 11 1.2.5 The EU TEN-T Core and Comprehensive network ................................................. 11 1.2.6 ITS deployment on the Danube Region Road Network ........................................ 14 1.2.7 A display of some of the basic data about roads in the Danube region presented in charts ..................................................................................................................... 15 2 REGION DESCRIPTIONS IN THE DANUBE REGION .............................................................. 20 2.1 AUSTRIA ............................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 BOSNA AND HERCEGOVINA .............................................................................................. 21 2.3 BULGARIA ............................................................................................................................. 22 2.4 CROATIA ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.5 THE CZECH REPUBLIC ....................................................................................................... 24 2.6 GERMANY - BADEN WÜRTTEMBERG ............................................................................... 25 2.7 GERMANY – BAVARIA ......................................................................................................... 26 2.8 HUNGARY ............................................................................................................................. 27 2.9 MOLDOVA ............................................................................................................................. 28 2.10 MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................................................... 29 2.11 ROMANIA .............................................................................................................................. 30 2.12 SERBIA .................................................................................................................................. 31 2.13 SLOVAKIA ............................................................................................................................. 32 2.14 SLOVENIA ............................................................................................................................. 33 2.15 UKRAINE – CHERNIVITSI .................................................................................................. 34 2.16 UKRAINE - IVANO FRANKIVSKA ....................................................................................... 35 2.17 UKRAINE – ODESSA ........................................................................................................... 36 2.18 UKRAINE - ZAKARPATYA ................................................................................................... 37 3 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 38 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 38 3.2 ASSET MANAGEMENT AND PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT ................................................ 38 2 3.3 OBJECTIVES AND BENEFIT OF A PMS ............................................................................. 40 3.4 DATA COLLECTION AND INFORMATION ........................................................................ 40 3.5 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 41 3.6 EXPECTATION ON RESULTS OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT APPROACH .......... 42 3.7 STATE OF THE ART PMS TECHNOLOGY ......................................................................... 43 3.8 MEETING THE OBJECTIVES IN PRACTICE ...................................................................... 44 3.8.1 Allocation of maintenance funds ............................................................................... 44 3.8.2 Development of
Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
  • (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects

    (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects

    Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • 1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf

    1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf

    ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Издавач Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Кумодрашка 257, 11000 Београд За издавача Душан Богојевић Уредници проф. др Милан Вујанић Биљана Вуксановић, дипл. инж. грађ. Графички дизајн: Омнибус, Београд Штампа: Дедрапласт, Београд Тираж: 300 ISBN: 978-86-88541-01-5 ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Београд , 2014. САДРЖАЈ Уводна реч Милан Вујанић... 15 Поздравна реч Биљана Вуксановић... 17 ТЕМА 1... Студије и пројектовање / Studies and Design SOIL TREATMENT WITH LIME FOR FINE CLAYEY SOILS: AN ECONOMICAL SOLUTION FOR SUBGRADE, SUB BASE, BASE & CAPPING LAYERS Christophe Denayer, Gabriele Tebaldi... 21 MAGISTRALNI PUT M18 (E 762) FOČA (BIH) - ŠĆEPAN POLJE (CG) KAO DIO GLAVNE PUTNE MREŽE REGIONA - PROJEKTOVANJE I MODERNIZACIJA Predrag Šarkinović, Elvir Alić, Mario Jerčinović... 21 ODABIR OPTIMALNOG SISTEMA NAPLATE PUTARINE ZA MREŽU AUTOPUTEVA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE "CASE STUDY" Draženko Glavić... 22 PREGLED DIMENZIONIRANJA SAVITLJIVIH KOLNIČKIH KONSTRUKCIJA U EUROPSKOJ I NAŠOJ REGULATIVI Boris Čutura, Ivan Lovrić, Branko Mazić... 23 EKSPERIMENTALNO ISPITIVANJE STABILNOSTI POTPORNIH ZIDOVA OD PREFABRIKOVANIH BETONBLOK ELEMENATA Nebojša Davidović, Zoran Bonić, Verka Prolović, Nikola Romić, Nikola Davidović... 24 PROJEKAT AUTOPUTA E-80 NIŠ – DIMITROVGRAD Milosav Rajković... 24 HIJERARHIJSKA KONTROLA PRISTUPA NA DRŽAVNE PUTEVE - OBAVEZA PLANERA/PROJEKTANTA Dušan Savković... 26 EVALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION AND TRAFFIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES FOR A WIDE-AREA NETWORK Reza Omrani, Pedram Izadpanah, Goran Nikolic, Alireza Hadayeghi... 26 ИЗВОЂЕЊЕ ТУНЕЛА ''БАНЦАРЕВО'' Слободан Савић..
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
  • 3Rd Workplan

    3Rd Workplan

    Baltic Adriatic Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Kurt Bodewig APRIL 2018 Mobility and Transport APRIL 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. Publication date: April 2018 Reference source of analysis: 2015-2017 Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Study, Final Report, January 2018 Contents 1. Towards the third Baltic-Adriatic corridor work plan .................................... 5 2. Characteristics of the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor ............................................... 8 2.1. From the Polish to the Adriatic ports – corridor alignment ........................... 8 2.2. Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ........................................................................ 9 2.3. Progress of corridor development ............................................................17 3. Transport market analysis .......................................................................... 19 3.1. Results of the multimodal transport market study .....................................19 3.2. Capacity issues on the rail and road networks ..........................................23 4. Planned projects along the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org

    Documents.Worldbank.Org

    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website

    DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website

    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
  • 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019

    2019 Annual Report Annual 2019

    a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
  • Dubrovnik, Croatia 2019 TABLE of CONTENTS

    Dubrovnik, Croatia 2019 TABLE of CONTENTS

    GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE TOURISM COUNCIL DESTINATION ASSESSMENT Dubrovnik, Croatia 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................................................................4 Acronyms........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables.....................................................................................................................................................................................6 List of Figures...................................................................................................................................................................................7 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Tourism in Dubrovnik ......................................................................................................................................11 A. Geography and Tourism Statistics..................................................................................................................11
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus

    Serbia 2029 Prospectus

    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).