DOCSLIB.ORG

Ppp Report 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ppp Report 2009 EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: CONTENTS The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. The Report is in three main sections. The first provides an overview of the current state of the European market and our Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. perspectives on future directions. Section 2 contains the country sections. Section 3 contains project lists derived from the Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Infra-News database. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SERBIA 96 Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for VIEW FROM SERBIA 97 SECTION 1 assistance with the report on Portugal. SLOVAKIA 98 THE FUTURE DIRECTION 5 VIEW FROM SLOVAKIA 100 Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. SLOVENIA 101 VIEW FROM EIB 9 SPAIN 103 Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. CURRENT LOCATION 13 SWEDEN 107 VIEW FROM SWEDEN 108 All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, VIEW FROM FRANCE 16 TURKEY 109 Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. VIEW FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM 17 VIEW FROM TURKEY 111 VIEW FROM GERMANY 20 UKRAINE 112 SECTION 2 UNITED KINGDOM 116 COUNTRY SECTIONS SECTION 3 AUSTRIA 25 ProJect Lists BELGIUM 27 AUSTRIA 123 Production of Report and Copyright BULGARIA 29 BELGIUM 127 VIEW FROM BULGARIA 30 BULGARIA 135 This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise CROATIA 33 Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. CROATIA 136 CYPRUS 35 CYPRUS 137 DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** CZECH REPUBLIC 37 CZECH REPUBLIC 138 indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. DENMARK 39 DENMARK 143 This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to FINLAND 41 FINLAND 146 be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor. Any part of this document which is used with either the FRANCE 43 FRANCE 147 consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor must be used accurately and not used in a misleading, defamatory or unlawful context, nor for the creation of a database using the GERMANY 49 GERMANY 168 information in this document. Any part of this document which is used with the consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor must be acknowledged as the copyright of DLA VIEW FROM GERMANY Piper or the relevant Contributor, specifying the title of this document. GREECE 192 Financing social infrastructure HUNGARY 201 Disclaimer: This report is intended as an overview and nothing in this document is intended to provide specific legal advice. DLA Piper does not intend that any person relies on PPP Projects in Germany 51 ITALY 205 the information set out in this report unless otherwise agreed in writing. VIEW FROM INDUSTRY 52 LATVIA 224 DLA Piper has sought to ensure that the details of projects contained in this document have been accurately described at the time of publication. However, neither DLA Piper nor VIEW FROM GERMANY LITHUANIA 224 any of its partners or employees nor any other person acting on behalf of such persons makes any promise, guarantee or representation (express or implied) to any person as to the PPP in Germany – the role of the Bundesländer 54 MALTA 225 accuracy or completeness of the content of this document, or of any other information or materials, whether written or oral, that have been, or may be, prepared or furnished by or GREECE 55 the NETHERLANDS 226 on behalf of DLA Piper in connection with this report, including, without limitation, economic and financial projections and risk evaluation. No responsibility or liability is accepted by VIEW FROM GREECE 56 any person for any errors, misstatements or omissions in this document, negligent or otherwise, or any other such information or materials to the extent permitted by law. Without NORWAY 232 HUNGARY 59 prejudice to the foregoing, neither DLA Piper nor any of its respective employees nor any person acting on behalf of such persons shall be liable for loss or damage (whether direct, POLAND 234 VIEW FROM HUNGARY indirect or consequential) suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in or omission in this document to the extent permitted by law. PORTUGAL 238 Hungarian Procurement 59 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND 249 This disclaimer, including any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it, shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the law of England and Wales. VIEW FROM HUNGARY ROMANIA 261 *”DLA Piper” means the limited liability partnerships, unlimited liability partnerships, limited liability companies and other entities (whether or not incorporated and whether The benefit of the Education Programme 60 RUSSIA 265 or not having legal personality) which form part of the international legal practice known as DLA Piper. Details of the member entities of DLA Piper are available on the ITALY 63 SERBIA 268 website: www.dlapiper.com. LATVIA 68 SLOVAKIA 269 **EPEC is a collaborative initiative of the European Investment Bank, the European Commission and entities from participating EU Member States and Candidate Countries LITHUANIA 71 slovenia 270 (“EPEC Members”). VIEW FROM LITHUANIA SPAIN 271 *** A “Contributor” is an author of a contribution to the Report as identified in the Report. Development of the Lithuanian PPP Process 73 SWEDEN 288 MALTA 74 TURKEY 290 the NETHERLANDS 75 UKRAINE 291 NORWAY 77 UNITED KINGDOM 293 POLAND 79 NORTHERN IRELAND 387 VIEW FROM POLAND 80 SCOTLAND 391 PORTUGAL 83 WALES 396 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND 86 ROMANIA 88 ABBREVIATIONS 397 VIEW FROM ROMANIA 89 CONTACTS 402 RUSSIA 92 2 3 | European PPP Report 2009 | The Future Direction | Section 1 Section 1 | The Future Direction | European PPP Report 2009 | THE FUTURE DIRECTION INTRODUCTION ■ An alternative asset class for pension funds giving them the opportunity to match their long term liabilities with The DLA Piper European PPP Report 2007 was upbeat relatively low risk, index linked revenue streams. and buoyant, reporting on an expanding market with good prospects for sustainable growth. By the end of 2007, Many governments have used spending on infrastructure, the market had changed dramatically, coming close to including on PPPs, as an anti-cyclical method of stopping in its tracks. The spread of the banking crisis stimulating the economy. In addition, the EU Commission’s has brought about a re-evaluation of whether funders can recent Communication on PPP (published in November 2009) provide long term, highly leveraged project finance, given has promoted the use of PPPs as an economic tool. In this the lack of confidence in refinancing options and in capital environment, the majority of European countries are likely markets. Deals have closed, but on significantly higher to significantly step up their PPP programmes or commence margins and more aggressive terms, with general difficulty major PPP programmes for the first time. in reaching financial close in a timely manner on even the best of projects. Equally, the public sector has been THE CURRENT DIFFICULTIES suffering with a reduction in tax revenues and big holes in The current situation has highlighted the following government budgets, together with rising unemployment deficiencies: and social expenditure. Thus, governments have had to look hard at their economic policies and decide whether ■ Liquidity shortages amongst commercial banks and they should use spending on infrastructure as an the closure of capital markets has prevented them from anti-cyclical measure. providing debt financing and meeting commitments. ■ The concept of a long term partnership needs to be able THE BENEFITS OF PPP to accommodate the prospect of change in private sector Broadly, the public sector across Europe is in support partners over the life of the project and seek to reward of involving the private sector in the provision of public and incentivise them throughout the various stages of services through a PPP model. This is because it is generally the concession to meet the public sector expectations accepted that PPPs have provided the following benefits: and requirements for on going change. ■ Significantly increased proportion of large scale ■ Ad hoc measures introduced to deal with the issues infrastructure projects delivered to time and budget. arising from tensions arising from economic prosperity (eg high private sector profits made through refinancing ■ Promotion of the movement from a construction to a gains) need to be systematised into a more coherent service culture which has increased innovation and regulatory system which can also cope with issues competition with better design to minimise life cycle arising from economic downturn (eg compulsory costs, and transfer of life cycle risks. refinancing due to mini-perm structures). ■ Enhanced project evaluation and due diligence skills ■ It is becoming more difficult for projects to be off from independent funding parties to test the robustness balance sheet, either by reason of the different risk of projects. transfers that the economic crisis has brought about or ■ Widespread innovation and higher quality standards because of the evolution of international accounting rules. through the introduction of competitiveness into public The expectations are that many of these problems will sector services, including across borders.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Framework for Soft and Hard City Infrastructures
    Cite this article Research Article Keywords: design methods & aids/ Dyer M, Dyer R, Weng MH et al. (2019) Paper 1900021 infrastructure planning/ Framework for soft and hard city infrastructures. Received 28/06/2019; urban regeneration Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Urban Design and Planning 172(6): 219–227, Accepted 03/10/2019; https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.19.00021 Published online 04/12/2019 Published with permission by the ICE under the CC-BY 4.0 license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Urban Design and Planning Framework for soft and hard city infrastructures Mark Dyer DPhil, FICE, CEng Thomas Grey BArch, MSc Professor, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand Senior Research Fellow, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (corresponding author: [email protected]) Richard Gleeson BA, MSc (Orcid:0000-0002-6766-0893) Retired Dublin City Planner, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Rachel Dyer BA, MSc Tomás García Ferrari Planning Officer, Hamilton City Council, Hamilton, New Zealand Senior Lecturer in Graphical Design, University of Waikato, Hamilton, Min-Hsien Weng PhD New Zealand Senior Research Fellow, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand Shaoqun Wu PhD Lecturer in Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand The term city infrastructures is often restricted to the physical elements of a city, while in practice it comprises both hard infrastructures for built environment and utilities, as well as soft infrastructures involving services, social groupings and personal skills. Part of the confusion is the lack of clarity about the role and delivery of city infrastructures and its relationship to livelihood and livability.
    [Show full text]
  • Texto Tomado De La Revista Vía Libre Mayo-Junio 2020
    operadores El ferrocarril ante la crisis sanitaria La crisis sanitaria provocada por la pan- del Congreso el 27 de abril, se pusieron en marcha las primeras medidas, basadas en directrices del Ministe- demia del coronavirus ha afectado desde rio de Sanidad. Así, se adaptaron y revisaron los protocolos el punto de vista sanitario, social y eco- de actuación existentes en relación con el transpor- nómico a todo el mundo, sin exclusión te de viajeros, y a principios de marzo se implantó un procedimiento específico de actuación frente a posi- de sectores o segmentos de actividad. En bles casos en el ámbito ferroviario. Ya el 12 de marzo, Renfe abrió la posibilidad de devolución o el cambio el ferrocarril, que une a su condición de de billetes sin sobrecoste. El estado de alarma, de quince días de dura- estratégico social y económicamente, la ción inicial, en el ámbito del transporte supuso la he- de ser el del modo de transporte masivo rramienta para hacer frente a la crisis sanitaria, redu- ciendo la movilidad de los viajeros y garantizando el por excelencia, la pandemia y las medi- abastecimiento. El Real Decreto reducía los servicios, estable- das tomadas para atajarla, han puesto a cía la obligación de realizar una limpieza diaria de los vehículos de transporte, la inclusión de mensajes en prueba, como ninguna otra circunstancia, los sistemas de venta de billetes desaconsejando el a administraciones, reguladores, gestores viaje, y la necesidad de adoptar la máxima separación posible entre los pasajeros. de infraestructura, operadores e industria. Además, daba a los operadores un plazo de cinco días para cumplir con la oferta establecida de forma homogénea entre los distintos servicios, y facultaba a las autoridades competentes delegadas Ya antes de la declaración del estado de alarma, el 14 para adoptar medidas adicionales de limitación en de marzo, según detalló el ministro de Transportes, el transporte colectivo, necesarias para preservar la Movilidad y Agenda Urbana, José Luis Ábalos, en su salud pública.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting Value from Municipal Solid Waste for Greener Cities: the Case of the Republic of Korea
    KNOWLEDGE NOTE SERIES 04 EXTRACTING VALUE FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE FOR GREENER CITIES: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA EIKO WATAYA WB, FAROUK MOLLAH BANNA WB, INHYE BAK WB, DR. JAEMIN SONG UNIVERSITY OF SEOUL, SANG HYUN YOON SUDOKWON LANDFILL SITE MANAGEMENT CORP., AND DR. SORA YI KOREA ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE1 INTRODUCTION Municipal solid waste is discarded material that originates mostly from human activities in urban areas. It is well documented that improperly disposed of solid waste can negatively impact human health and the environment. For example, uncollected solid waste is one of the leading causes of flooding in slums, which claims thousands of human lives worldwide every year. Uncollected municipal solid waste can also affect other key sectors, such as tourism, hindering a country’s economic growth. The irony is that much of this waste could be reclaimed as renewable resources and help alleviate raw material and energy shortages in a cost- effective manner. To make municipal solid waste a usable resource, recycling must be encouraged, and ideally collected and separated at the source. Such a shift requires an integrated approach to policy creation that includes governance structures, technologies, investments, and citizen engagement— often challenging in fast-growing urban centers witnessing population growth, rapid urbanization, economic development, changes in human consumption, technology development, and more. As countries urbanize and 1 This paper has benefited from the peer review and input of Silpa Kaza (Urban Specialist/World Bank) and David Lerpiniere (Consultant/World Bank). grow economically, the level of waste generation per capita increases. The complexity of the waste stream typically also increases as the proportion of plastics, electronics, and hazardous waste grows and the share of biodegradable materials decreases.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Institute for Strategic International Studies ISIS - 2011 REPORT Emergency Readiness is Leadership Driven Institute for Strategic International Studies - ISIS 2011 Contents Membership … 3 Executive Summary … 4 Domestic Research Plan … 6 Global Research Plan … 7 International Field Studies - Interviews … 10 ISIS 2011 – Consolidation Of Research – What Canada Needs to Know … 11 ISIS 2011 - Themes … 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners
    Ref. Ares(2018)5063294 - 03/10/2018 Mediterranean practitioners’ network & capacity building for effective response to emerging security challenges MEDEA is a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme H2020-SEC-21-GM-2016-2017, under grant agreement no 787111. Additional information about the project and the consortium can be found at www.medea-project.eu D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners Contractual Delivery Date: 08/2018 Actual Delivery Date: 03/10/2018 Dissemination level: Public Version: 1.0 Abstract This deliverable lists the major International, Regional and National organizations, around the Management of Migration Flows and Asylum seekers, Border Management and Surveillance, Cross Border Crime and Terrorism and Natural Hazards and Natechs, containing profiling and contact information, as well as their particular area of expertise. The main scope and objectives of the Registry are defined in the current document. DISCLAIMER: This document contains material, which is the copyright of the MEDEA consortium members and the European Commission, and may not be reproduced or copied without permission, except as mandated by the European Commission grant agreement no. 787111 for reviewing and dissemination purposes. Copyright by the MEDEA consortium, 2018-2023. D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners Document Control - Revision History Issue Date Comment Author / Institution 0.1 30/08/2018 Finalise Practitioners template EUC, DGAP Desktop research in 4 TCPs. Create excel 30/08/2018 KEMEA 0.2 registry 0.3 06/09/2018 Transfer Excel entries to Deliverable KEMEA 0.4 17/09/2018 Add inputs from partners KEMEA, EUC The information contained in this document is provided by the copyright holders "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Data for the Public Good
    Data for the public good NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION National Infrastructure Commission report | Data for the public good Foreword Advances in technology have always transformed our lives and indeed whole industries such as banking and retail. In the same way, sensors, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and machine learning can transform the way we use and manage our national infrastructure. Government could spend less, whilst delivering benefits to the consumer: lower bills, improved travel times, and reduced disruption from congestion or maintenance work. The more information we have about the nation’s infrastructure, the better we can understand it. Therefore, data is crucial. Data can improve how our infrastructure is built, managed, and eventually decommissioned, and real-time data can inform how our infrastructure is operated on a second-to-second basis. However, collecting data alone will not improve the nation’s infrastructure. The key is to collect high quality data and use it effectively. One path is to set standards for the format of data, enabling high quality data to be easily shared and understood; much that we take for granted today is only possible because of agreed standards, such as bar codes on merchandise which have enabled the automation of checkout systems. Sharing data can catalyse innovation and improve services. Transport for London (TfL) has made information on London’s transport network available to the public, paving the way for the development of apps like Citymapper, which helps people get about the city safely and expediently. But it is important that when information on national infrastructure is shared, this happens with the appropriate security and privacy arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Issn 2654-1823
    SAFEGREECE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ISSN 2654-1823 14-17.10 proceedings SafeGreece 2020 – 7th International Conference on Civil Protection & New Technologies 14‐16 October, on‐line | www.safegreece.gr/safegreece2020 | [email protected] Publisher: SafeGreece [www.safegreece.org] Editing, paging: Katerina – Navsika Katsetsiadou Title: SafeGreece 2020 on‐line Proceedings Copyright © 2020 SafeGreece SafeGreece Proceedings ISSN 2654‐1823 SafeGreece 2020 on-line Proceedings | ISSN 2654-1823 index About 1 Committees 2 Topics 5 Thanks to 6 Agenda 7 Extended Abstracts (Oral Presentations) 21 New Challenges for Multi – Hazard Emergency Management in the COVID-19 Era in Greece Evi Georgiadou, Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE) 23 An Innovative Emergency Medical Regulation Model in Natural and Manmade Disasters Chih-Long Pan, National Yunlin University of Science and technology, Taiwan 27 Fragility Analysis of Bridges in a Multiple Hazard Environment Sotiria Stefanidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 31 Nature-Based Solutions: an Innovative (Though Not New) Approach to Deal with Immense Societal Challenges Thanos Giannakakis, WWF Hellas 35 Coastal Inundation due to Storm Surges on a Mediterranean Deltaic Area under the Effects of Climate Change Yannis Krestenitis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 39 Optimization Model of the Mountainous Forest Areas Opening up in Order to Prevent and Suppress Potential Forest Fires Georgios Tasionas, Democritus University of Thrace 43 We and the lightning Konstantinos Kokolakis,
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • T12 Traffic Management.Pdf
    Page 2 / 99 Submitted by: Task 12 group leader, Paul van der Kroon Prepared by: Group leader: Paul van der Kroon (The Netherlands) Group members: Austria Markus Bartsch , Sigrid Pirkelbauer , Michael Schneider Cyprus Alexis Avgoustis Denmark Finn Krenk Finland Petteri Portaankorva France Christophe Desnouailles Germany Georg Stern Italy Sandro La Monica, Pier Paolo Cartolano The Netherlands Bert Helleman Henk Jan de Haan Maarten Amelink (supporting consultant) Sweden Maria Nichan i Henrik Sundquist Bjorn Carselid Switzerland Gerhard Petersen / Markus Bartsch United Kingdom David Stones Nicholas Taylor (supporting consultant) Felicity Keen Overview meetings: 3–4 June 2009 Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 –25 September 2009 Stockho lm, Sweden 19 –21 January 2010 Paris, France (joint meeting with task group 11) 19 –20 May 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 6–7 October 2010 Vienna, Austria 10 –11 February 2011 Rome, Italy 22 –23 June 2011 Helsinki, Finland 3–4 November 2011 Bern, Switzerland 22 –23 February 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 29 June 2012 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 27 September 2012 This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not consider these views to be statements of the official position of CEDR's member states. ISBN : 979-10-93321-00-4 Traffic management to reduce congestion Page 3 / 99 This report is: FOR DECISION 1. Executive summary Purpose of the paper Congestion on the European road network has increased significantly over the past decade. This is the result of an increase in car ownership and car use in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019
    a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlet Centres in Europe
    MARKET SURVEY March 2021 Outlet Centres in Europe Market Survey covering all operating and planned Outlet Centres in the European Countries Study within the Scope of ecostra’s Basic Research understanding markets | evaluating risks | discovering chances Preliminary remarks Beginning in the USA and, over the past 25 years, subsequently spreading in Europe as well, a new retail format has been established: the Factory Outlet Centre (FOC) or Designer Outlet Centre (DOC). In the meantime, such a high density of Outlet Centres already exists in some European countries (e.g. Great Britain), that one can certainly speak of market saturation here. Thus, in Great Britain, as in the USA also, a market shakeout is observable among locations of Outlet Centres, whereby the most professional operators, and accordingly suitable locations, win out over less productive concepts or locations with weaknesses. The situation in continental Europe is somehow different. Due what are, to date, extremely restrictive building permission procedures compared to those in the rest of Europe, Germany has only a very few Outlet Centres in relation to the size of this national market. However, there is little doubt that this will change in the medium-term perspective, at least. The kind of emotional argument that often used to take place until just a few years ago has now given way to a much more factual discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of establishing an Outlet Centre. Whereas Germany still shows a lot of potential for new Outlet Centres, Italy has seen a rapid development in the last years, and it’s difficult to discover any “white spots” on the map there.
    [Show full text]