DOCSLIB.ORG

Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and Organisational Structure the Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and Organisational Structure the Airport Competition between Airports and the Application of Sfare Aid Rules Volume H ~ Country Reports Italy Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and organisational structure The airport is part of Gruppo SEA (Milan Airports). Ownership is 14.6% local government and 84.6% City of Milan. Other shareholders hold the remaining 0.8%. Privatisation (partial) was scheduled for the end of 2001 but was stopped after the events of 11th September. Now the proposed date is October 2002 but this has still to be finalised. Only 30% of the shareholding will be moved into the private sector with no shareholder having more than 5%. There are no legislative changes required. The provision of airport services is shared between ENAV (ATC), Italian police (police), SEA (security), ATA and SEA Handling (passenger and ramp handling), Dufntal (duty-free) and SEA Parking (car parking). There are no current environmental issues but, in the future, there is a possible night ban and charges imposed according to aircraft noise. 2 Type ofairpo Milan Linate is a city-centre (almost) airport that serves mainly the scheduled domestic and international market with a growing low-cost airline presence (Buzz, Go). There is very little charter and cargo traffic but some General Aviation. The airport is subject to traffic distribution rules imposed by the Italian government with the aim of 'encouraging' airlines to move to Malpensa. Traffic Data (2000) Domestic fíghts Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 2 103 341 _ 2 103 341 Terminal Passengers (departures) 2 084 008 . 2 084 008 Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 1093 7 1 100 Cargo (tonnes - outbound) 1213 4 1217 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 44 022 8 44 030 Intemaüonal flights (Intra EU) Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 915 656 294 915 950 Terminal Passengers (departures) 920 653 160 920 813 Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 3 446 _ 3 446 Cargo (tonnes-outbound) 4 054 - 4 054 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 21394 7 21401 Л/г Transport Group, School of Engineering, Cranfield University ITL-13 Competition between Airports and the Application of State Aid Rules Volume II ~ Country Reports Italy International nights (non-EU) Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 166 489 655 Terminal Passengers (departures) _ 1052 1052 Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 4 . 4 Cargo (tonnes - outbound) 1 ¡ 1 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 37 51 3 Route structure and key airlines Dominant airlines at Linate are Alitalia and Air One, both ól frating the Milan Linate ~ Rome shuttle. British Airways and Lufthansa have a relatively limfpl presence. Apart from Rome, the major routes from Linate serve London, Frankfurt and Pfis. 4 Catchment area I J| The catchment area for Linate is defined in the following Tal Type of Traffic Catchment area definition Overlaps with other airports Scheduled domestic 30 minutes driving time Malpensa, Bergamo Scheduled international 60 minutes driving time Malpensa, Bergamo (origin-destination traffic) I Scheduled international 60 minutes driving time Malpensa (transfer traffic) Charter international Up to 120 minutes driving time Malpensa, Bergamo I Cargo (origin-destination traffic) Malpensa, Bergamo Cargo (transfer traffic) 5 Competing airports In terms of competing airports and market segments. Jnate does not have any real competitor because its strategic position gives an advantaj over all other airports. Linate is only 7 km from the centre of Milan and is served by motorway and public transport services. Most of the population in the catchment area of| Ian prefers to be served by Linate instead of Malpensa or Bergamo (the two nearest airports) 6 Current andfiiture investment plans There appears to have been no major investment undertaķfļj in the last few years nor is any planned in the future. As for surface infrastructure, future plans include a pre-fe sility study for a new subway line linking the airport with the centre of Milan. ITL-14 Air Transport Group, School of Engineeringl roranfiė/cr University Competition between Airports and the Application of State Aid Rules Volume II ~ Country Reports Italy 7 Airport charges Airport charges include take-off, landing, passenger service, aircraft parking, air bridges and security. The principal charges are based on MTOW. Until 2002, the government, with the exception of air bridge charges (decided by the airport), set all charges. The charges are the same for all airlines. Starting from 2002 charges will be revised by each airport taking into account traffic levels and airport costs. The charges still have to be approved by government. There are no user discounts available. 8 Financial performance The summary SEA Group Profit and Loss account (Euro) below is taken from the Annual Report of SEA Milan. Data is not broken down for individual airports (not in the public domain, anyway). Year ending 2000 í 999 1998 Aeronautical income 399 387 340 354 277 030 338 174 945 Concession income 93175 468 83 573 661 80 853 393 Other income 46 631 958 44 845 608 Tota income 539 194 765 482 696 299 4Í9 028 338 Staff costs 251 028 151 255 068 320 206 034 799 Security costs Policing costs Depreciation 56 798 173 54 133 540 30 905 297 Other costs 143 734 232 141 024 570 115 670 335 Tota costs 451 560 556 450226 430 352 6Í0 431 Operating profir 87 634 209 32 469 868 66 417 907 Interest received 12 569 117 21 289 137 8 354 207 Interest paid 17 316 057 14 541 908 Extraordinary items 77 190 108 42 767 543 - 9 638 635 Pre-tax profit 160 077 377 81 984 641 65 733 478 Taxation 76 721 587 39 106 855 33 613 081 Net prom 83355 790 42 877 785 31 520 397 There is no data available on security costs but these are probably included in other staff costs. Corporation tax is paid on earnings. Depreciation is based on straight line, for the following typical depreciation periods: Terminal and buildings 100 years Runways, taxiways and aprons nil if paid for by Government Air Transport Group, School of Engineering, Cranfíeld University ITL-15 Competition between Airports and the Application of State Aid Rules Volume II ~ Country Reports Italy Plant and machinery 3-10 years Terminal / airport systems 5 years Vehicles, equipment 4-5 years Sources offitnding None reported 10 Public funding issues There has been no significant investment at Linate foillmany years. In any case, the introduction of traffic distribution rules had the intention ó||ramferrmg airlines to Malpensa (being congested and suffering from environmental constrJJits!) with Linate being reserved solely for Alitalia and Air One operations. As it has turned otíjt, due to EU pressure, the major European airlines still have a presence at Linate, which is|ļie preferred airport for busmess traffic associated with Milan. ITL-16 Air Transport Group, School of Engineering, Wkanfield University Competition between Airports and the Application of State Aid Rules Volume II ~ Country Reports Italy Milan Malpensa Ownership and organisational structure The airport is part of Gruppo SEA (Milan Airports). The main shareholders of SEA are the Municipality of Milan owning 84.559 % and the Province of Milan owning 14.558 %. Other shareholders hold the remaining 0.8%. Malpensa has an alliance with other important cargo hubs and is part of Galaxy bitemational Cargo Airport Alliance. SEA also owns 49.98 % of Sacbo (the company handling Bergamo Orio al Serio airport), 12.5 % of Aeradria (the company handling Rimini airport), 5 % of Gesac (the company handling Napoli airport) and 0.96 % of Sagat (the company handling Torino Caselle airport). Privatisation (partial) was scheduled for the end of 2001 but was stopped after the events of 11* September. Now the proposed date is October 2002 but this has still to be finalised. Only 30% of the shareholding will be moved into the private sector with no shareholder having more than 5%. There are no legislative changes required. The provision of airport services is shared between ENAV (ATC), Italian police (police), SEA (security), ATA and SEA Handling (passenger and ramp handling), Dufiital (duty-free) and SEA Parking (car parking). Environmental restrictions were imposed in late 2000. Runways have to be operated 8 hours for departures and then 8 hours for departures, alternatively on a continuous basis. There are other noise restrictions that are applied to flight paths, noise abatement and night flights. 2 Type of airport Milan Malpensa is an international gateway airport serving the north of Italy. This airport caters for all market. In recent years Alitalia had thought about developing Malpensa as a hub for their international operations. However, due to environmental and infrastructure constraints this policy has had to be revised and hub operations now appear to be concentrated on Rome Fiumicino. Traffic Data (2000) Domestic flights Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 2 728 122 38 817 2 766 939 Terminal Passengers (departures) 2 688 028 36 579 2 724 607 Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 4 226 50 4 276 Cargo (tonnes -outbound) 6 888 89 6 977 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 72 799 1368 74167 Air Transport Group, School of Engineering, Cranfìeld University ITL-17 I Competition between Airports and the Application of State Aid Rules Volume II - Country Reports Italy International tiights (Intra EU) Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 3 647 805 366 793 4 104 598 Terminal Passengers (departures) 3 623 655 376 203 3 999 858 Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 16 522 91 16 613 Cargo (tonnes - outbound) 23 214 128 23 342 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 109 526 ! 5 882 115 408 ! I 1 í International lights (non-EU) Scheduled I Charter Total ι Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 2 735 700 ! 795 638 3 531 338 I Terminal Passengers (departures) 2 687 493 I '| 815 307 3 502 800 I I Cargo (tonnes - inbound) 108 868 I 668 109 536 Cargo (tonnes - outbound) 128 939 I 1297 130 236 Aircraft movements (arrivals + departures) 47 965 10 082 58 047 Route structure and key airlines Alitalia heavily dominates the scheduled domestic núujist segment and, likewise, the international scheduled and cargo market.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
    VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Routes and Second Home Tourism. the French Market in the Algarve
    AIRLINE ROUTES AND SECOND HOME TOURISM. THE FRENCH MARKET IN THE ALGARVE Cláudia Ribeiro Almeida1 ABSTRACT The new routes and services provided by low cost carriers enable the emergence of new tourist destinations in Europe and the development of new market segments that value the cheap and easy air accessibilities. One of the best examples is second home tourism (normally associated with residential tourism) that grew in recent years, mainly in tourism destinations in the south of Europe and Mediterranean. One of them is the Algarve that receive nowadays new second home owners coming from several countries, mainly because of the region’ great weather conditions, security and air accessibilities. France is one of the new second home market in Algarve, mainly because of the new Non-Habitual Residents (NHR) regime, that provides to new residents a very attractive tax benefits for their 10 years living in Portugal, as well as the new routes provided by low cost carriers since 2016 to eleven airports of France. Keywords: Low Cost Carriers, Residential Tourism, Algarve, French Market. JEL Classification: L85, L93, Z32 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, air transport significantly increased the number of flights, routes, destinations and passengers, heavily contributing to the process of airspace liberalisation. This process led to a shift from a management model with heavy state intervention to a competitive market model, allowing the entry of low cost carriers. These carriers have enabled consumers to enjoy a wider range of supply and low airfares (Costa & Almeida, 2018). In Europe, this process began in 1987 in the United Kingdom and Ireland, and strong growth allowed these carriers to capture quickly a large market share (Costa & Almeida, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2002 Contents Contents
    Annual Report 2002 contents Contents Address to shareholders 4 Key data 7 Board of Directors and Management 12 Corporate governance 15 Risk management 21 Significant events during 2002 23 Reports from the Divisions • Operations 25 • Marketing 27 • Buildings 29 • Corporate Development 31 Flight statistics 33 • 2002 flight statistics 34 • Market positioning 39 • Trend of traffic volumes 41 • Destinations 43 Financial report 45 • Group financial statements according to IFRS 46 • Audit report 70 • Financial statement pursuant to the Swiss Code of Obligations (OR) 71 • Audit report 79 3 address to shareholders Address to shareholders Dear Shareholders, During 2002, Zurich Airport felt the full impacts of the dissolution of SAirGroup, which gave rise to the need for comprehensive restructuring measures. The fundamental changes in ownership also led to a number of major challenges. Existing structures had to be completely reorganised, a task which Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG) successfully mastered. We were able to extract all the airside functions and infrastructures that are essential for airport business from the operations previously controlled by SAirGroup and now under new ownership, and bring them under our own control.This means that we have eliminated all inter- connections with and dependencies on external providers in the area of airside operations. We can therefore look back on a period of extremely intensive activity. But we still have a very busy time ahead of us, partly due to the step-by-step hand-over of components associated with expansion stage 5, but also in view of the political uncertainties throughout the world and their impacts on international civil aviation, and the ongoing debate on the home front concerning the function, size and operation of Zurich Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • SASCON'15 Program
    SASCON `15 Swiss Aviation Safety Conference 2015 Location Tannwaldstrasse. From there follow the street and turn at the end of the street to the right SASCON ‘15 - Fatigue Risk Hotel ARTE, Kongresszentrum into Von-Roll-Strasse. Follow the street till you Riggenbachstrasse 10 see the hotel on your right. 4601 Olten Management Systems www.konferenzhotel.ch How to arrive by car You may park your car in the Sälipark P1 close 8th September 2015 to the hotel. Coming from Zurich, Bern, Basel How to arrive by train and Lucerne take the highway exit Rothrist and follow the signs for Olten/Aarburg. Pass The hotel ARTE is approx. 10 minutes on foot the tunnel and continue on until you see on away from the Olten train station. Use the rail- your right the sign Hotel Arte. Turn right and way underpass, where you find the Migrolino follow the sign. After 500m you will see the shop (near platform 12). On the right hand Hotel. side of the shop climb the stairs leading to Cover image by Mark Rabo: flic.kr/p/7HCbnR Federal Office of Civil Aviation 2015 www.foca.admin.ch Program 09:00 - 09:30 Registration 13:30 - 14:00 Fatigue Risk Management Stefan Becker, Head of Corporate Development 09:30 - 09:45 Opening of SASCON ’15, Welcome Address Swiss Air Ambulance Ltd., REGA Dr. Peter Müller, Director General FOCA 14:00 - 14:30 Fatigue Risk Management At Swiss Ph.D. Loukia Loukopoulou, Manager, Human 09:45 - 10:30 Things We Once Believed: A Reflection On The Performance & Systems Evolution of Fatigue Management Swiss International Airlines Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Schweiz Suisse Svizzera Switzerland VFR Manual
    VFR Manual SWITZERLAND VFR 1 Schweiz Suisse Svizzera Switzerland VFR [email protected] Manual TEL: 043 931 61 68 FAX: 043 931 61 59 AFTN: LSSAYOYX AMDT 12/14 AIP Services Effective date: CH-8602 WANGEN BEI DÜBENDORF NOV 13 1 Beiliegende, in der Kontrollliste mit R (Ersatzblatt) oder N (neues Blatt) bezeichnete Blätter, einfügen. Alle in der Kontrollliste mit C (annulliertes Blatt) bezeichneten Blätter entfernen. Insérer les feuillets ci-joints, identifiés dans la liste de contrôle par un R (feuillet de remplacement) ou N (nouveau feuillet). Supprimer les feuillets ci-joints identifiés dans la liste de contrôle par un C (feuillet annulé). Inserire i fogli allegati, contrassegnati sulla lista di controllo con R (foglio di sostituzione) o N (foglio nuovo). Togliere tutti i fogli contrassegnati sulla lista di controllo con C (foglio annullato). Insert the attached sheets, identified in the check list by R (replacement sheet) or N (new sheet). Remove all sheets identified in the check list by C (sheet cancelled). 2 Alle in der Kontrollliste mit S bezeichneten Blätter bedeuten eine SUPPLEMENT-Veröffentlichung (SUP). Tous les feuillets identifiés dans la liste de contrôle par un S signifient une publication SUPPLEMENT (SUP). Tutti i fogli contrassegnati sulla lista di controllo con S significano una pubblicazione SUPPLEMENT (SUP). All sheets identified in the check list by S signify a SUPPLEMENT publication (SUP). 3 Nachtrag auf Seite VFR 7 eintragen. Inscrire l’amendement à la page VFR 7. Annotare l’emendamento alla pagina VFR 7. Record entry of amendment on page VFR 7. 4 AIC: Ins VFR Manual aufgenommen: Insérés dans le VFR Manual: NIL Inseriti nel VFR Manual: Incorporated in VFR Manual: 5 Kontrollliste SUP: Folgende SUP bleiben in Kraft: Liste de contrôle des SUP: Les SUP suivants restent en vigueur: 001/14, 002/14, 004/14, 005/14 Lista di controllo SUP: I seguenti SUP restano in vigore: Checklist SUP: Following SUP are still in force: Alle zur Zeit gültigen SUP-Blätter sind in der CHECK LIST mit S gekennzeichnet.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamins V. British European Airways
    Finding a Cause of Action for Wrongful Death in the Warsaw Convention: Benjamins v. British European Airways I. INTRODUCTION The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided in Benjamins v. British European Airways' that article 17 of the Warsaw Convention2 is self-executing. That is, the treaty alone, without additional legislative action, now creates a cause of action for wrongful death. The facts of the case are simple; on June 18, 1972, an airplane designed and manufactured by Hawker-Siddely Aviation, Ltd. and owned and operated by British European Airways departed for Brussels from London's Heathrow Airport. Soon thereafter, the plane crashed into a field, killing all 112 passengers. Abraham Benjamins, the spouse of one of the passengers, brought suit for wrongful death and baggage loss in the Eastern District of New York as representative of his wife's estate. Plaintiff was a Dutch citizen permanently residing in California. Defendants were British corporations with their principal places of business in the United Kingdom. The ticket on which the decedent was traveling had been purchased in Los Angeles. The original complaint alleged only diversity of citizenship as grounds for federal jurisdiction;3 because Benjamins, a resident alien, could not be diverse from an alien corporation,4 the complaint was dismissed. Benjamins' suit reached the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit after the district court, in an unreported decision, dismissed an amended complaint asserting federal question jurisdiction.5 The Second Circuit 1. 572 F.2d 913 (2d Cir. 1978). 2. Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to InternationalTransportation by Air, 49 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (Sample Document)
    THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (sample document) by 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Disclaimer Methodology and Assumptions Summary of Findings : Duty-Free Summary of Findings : Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary of Findings : Food & Beverage Summary Tables: Duty-Free Summary Tables: Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary Tables: Food & Beverage Airport Profiles : Argentina – Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 Airport Profiles : Australia – Sydney Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Melbourne Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Selected Australian Airports Airport Profiles : Austria – Vienna International Airport Airport Profiles : Bahrain – Bahrain International Airport Airport Profiles : Belgium – Brussels Airport Airport Profiles : Bulgaria – Sofia Airport Airport Profiles : Canada – Airports of Canada Airport Profiles : Canada – Ottawa International Airport The Airport Commercial Sales Benchmarking Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Airport Profiles : Canada – Toronto Pearson International Airport Airport Profiles : Chile – Arturo Benitez International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Beijing Capital International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shanghai Airports Airport Profiles : Costa Rica – Airports of Costa Rica Airport Profiles : Croatia – Dubrovnik Airport Airport Profiles : Croatia – Franjo Tuđman Airport Zagreb Airport Profiles : Czech Republic - Václav Havel Airport Prague Airport Profiles
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Fuerteventura Airport 2019 · 2020
    Fuerteventura Airport 2019 · 2020 / 20/2/2019 MAPA Fuerteventura Canary Islands Aena Spanish Airports (excluding MCV, QSA, SBO exclusive for GA) 1/1 20/2/2019 CONTENTS Contents Fuerteventura Highlights Fuerteventura Airport Traffic statistics Route maps Passenger profile Operational data Infrastructures & facilities Quality, environment & awards Measures against COVID-19 Our commitment with sustainability Incentives & marketing support Annex: Traffic statistics 1/1 Highlights 2019 · 2020 Fuerteventura 2019 2020 5,6M 2,1M % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Pax -7,9 % -62,0 % 47K 25K % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Ops -8,4 % -47,9 % 733K 344K % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Cargo -16,2 % -53,3 % Source: Aena. Provisional non-audited data 2020 (round trip) / 14/2/2020 HIGHLIGHTS (web) Highlights 2019 Fuerteventura Avg. pax / week Avg. ops / week 108,4K 908 18 47 158 Domestic Low cost 18 Destinations * * * International 45 % Routes Countries 81 Airlines 140 79% holidays · Residence · · Runway cap. · 21% FUE apt. province Ops. dep: 14 10% rest of Spain Ops. arr: 14 Pax profile 68% foreign Info Total ops: 24 Sources: * + 5,000 pax/year. Aena 2019 (round trip) Aena surveys 1/1 Traffic statistics Fuerteventura Annual traffic evolution Pax % Var. Pax 1,1% 12,9% 6,6% 5,5% 6,0M 6,1M -7,9% 0% 5,7M 5,6M 5,0M -20% -40% 2,1M -62,0% -60% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Monthly traffic evolution · 2019 528K 510K 505K 490K 485K 464K 457K 463K 448K 443K 429K 413K 0,4M 0,2M 0,0M 1 Ene 2 Feb 3 Mar 4 Abr 5 May 6 Jun 7 Jul 8 Ago 9 Sep 10 Oct 11 Nov 12 Dic 59 % Source: Summer season Aena.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria 2020 440 Austrian Airlines AG 424300 19210 UIA-VB 3289 30323
    Annex I EN Changes to National allocation table for the year 2020 pursuant to the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the linking of their greenhouse emissions trading systems, and to the Commission Delegated Decision C(2020) 3107 Note: The values for 2020 are total. They include the initial allocation for the flights between EEA Aerodromes and the additional allocation for the flights to and within Switzerland. These values need to be inserted as updates in the National Aviation Allocation Tables XML file. Member State: Austria ETSID Operator name 2020 440 Austrian Airlines AG 424300 19210 UIA-VB 3289 30323 International Jet Management GmbH 157 33061 AVCON JET AG 83 28567 Tupack Verpackungen Gesellschaft m.b.H. 17 25989 The Flying Bulls 16 45083 easyJet Europe Airline GmbH 1823642 Member State: Belgium ETSID Operator name 2020 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES 285422 27011 ASL Airlines Belgium 110688 2344 SAUDI ARABIAN AIRLINES CORPORATION 3031 32432 EgyptAir 315 29427 Flying Service 271 13457 EXCLU Flying Partners CVBA 81 36269 EXCLU VF International SAGL 22 28582 EXCLU Inter-Wetail c/o Jet Aviation Business Jets AG 14 Member State: Bulgaria ETSID Operator name 2020 29056 Bulgaria Air 81265 28445 BH AIR 41204 Member State: Croatia ETSID Operator name 2020 12495 Croatia Airlines hrvatska zrakoplovna tvrtka d.d. 88551 Member State: Cyprus ETSID Operator name 2020 7132 Joannou & Paraskevaides (Aviation) Limited 30 Member State: Czechia ETSID Operator name 2020 859 České aerolinie a.s. 256608 24903 Smartwings, a.s. 119819
    [Show full text]
  • Social Rights and Ethics Charter Editorial by Alexandre De Juniac
    Social Rights and Ethics Charter Editorial By Alexandre De Juniac The epitome of the values and rights underpinning the AIR FRANCE KLM Group’s identity and cohesion, the Social Rights and Ethics Charter applies to all employees of the two companies and their subsidiaries. An ambitious action plan spanning the Group as a whole, this Charter tackles various issues such as labour relations, ethics requirements and the respect for the environment and sustainable development principles. It highlights our vision of an open, united world, based on both economic responsibility and social and environmental progress. Negotiated with and signed by the staff representatives within the AIR FRANCE KLM European Works Council, this Charter is a prime example of how successful our contractual policy proves to be when it comes to achieving fair, balanced development. Every employee is now encouraged to become acquainted with this Charter and proactively endorse it. 1 Preamble The AIR FRANCE KLM Group and the AIR FRANCE KLM European Works Council (AFKL EWC) have jointly set out in this document the values and fundamental rights which underpin the identity of these two companies, and guide their social and ethics policy. These values and rights are the foundation for social, economic and cultural cohesion within each company and within the Group, which is essential to be able to share in the benefi ts of growth. The purpose of this Charter is to foster a climate of enhanced mutual trust and respect in a work environment in which no form of discrimination or harassment may be tolerated. The development of a work environment favorable to the good economic and commercial performance of the Group and each of its companies, to progress in labour relations and personnel advancement requires continuous and extensive cooperation on the part of all.
    [Show full text]