A Rhetorical Genealogy of Bacterial Psychology by Jennifer R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Title Page A Rhetorical Genealogy of Bacterial Psychology by Jennifer R. Saltmarsh B.A. in English, University of California, Berkeley, 2007 M.A. English Composition, San Francisco State University, 2011 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2019 Committee Membership Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Jennifer R. Saltmarsh It was defended on August 8, 2019 and approved by Cory Holding, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh Stephen Carr, Associate Professor, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh Richard Doyle, Edwin Earle Sparks Professor, Department of English, Pennsylvania State University Dissertation Director: Don Bialostosky, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright © by Jennifer R. Saltmarsh 2019 iii Abstract A Rhetorical Genealogy of Bacterial Psychology Jennifer R. Saltmarsh, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2019 This dissertation traces the historical trajectory of an idea: that we can learn about human perception and sensation by studying how microorganisms make decisions. Alfred Binet— experimental psychologist and master hypnotist—first put forward this idea in The Psychic Life of Microorganisms (1888). To investigate how Binet’s claim came to life eighty years later, I focus on research that I call “bacterial psychology.” This research studies microbial relations to, and influence upon, humans. To engage this research I approach rhetorical theory in two primary ways. First, I practice rhetoric of science in the traditional sense when I analyze scientists’ metaphors about microbes, which lean towards anthropomorphism. I engage rhetorical theory differently when I suggest we can use microbiome research to enhance theories of the body, to see suasive agency at the material and bodily level. In doing this, I step outside the established bounds of rhetoric of science—but with the intention of broadening the field and fostering dialogue between rhetoric and microbiome research. As the biological sciences explore the terra incognita of our non-discursive interactions, the exigence increases for humanities scholars to join conversations that are redefining the human. Our bodies and minds are being framed as distributed and composed of a multiplicity of agents, challenging assumptions about autonomy, individuality, and genetic determinism. Additionally, I argue that understanding ourselves as enmeshed with our environs enables us to be more responsive, and responsible, to our environs and to each other. To this end I synthesize research on microbial ecology with philosophies and worldviews that faded as the sciences developed, such iv as indigenous ecological knowledge, ancient Buddhism, and panpsychism—the idea that mind is derived from feeling and exists even in primitive life forms. In cross-pollinating these ideas with rhetorical theory and microbial ecology, I contribute to conversations in animal studies, ecological, and cultural rhetorics that question the locus of self. I conclude by synthesizing rhetorical theory on group identification, hypnosis, and suggestibility with microbiome research that echoes Binet’s suggestion—that microbes make decisions and we can learn about ourselves by studying them. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... x 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Julius Adler: Bacterial Motility Spells Death of Man ....................................................... 15 2.1 Binet’s Foray into Microbiology ................................................................................. 19 2.2 Julius Adler Traipses around New Age-ncy .............................................................. 28 2.3 Adler’s Latter Day Speculations: In Search of a Reductionist Agency? ................. 48 2.4 Transitional Conclusion: From Adler’s E. coli Psychology to Margulis’s Spirochete- Mind ..................................................................................................................................... 51 3.0 Lynn Margulis: Ecological Literacy and the Spirochete-Mind ........................................ 56 3.1 Lynn Margulis: Three Personas .................................................................................. 71 3.1.1 The Heroine of Symbiogenesis ......................................................................... 71 3.1.2 Evolutionary Provocateur ................................................................................ 73 3.1.3 Pseudo-scientist? New Age Populist? .............................................................. 76 3.2 Interlude: Locating Margulis within the Bigger Picture of this Project ................. 82 3.3 The Consciousness Feedback Loop: Bacteria, Brains, and Biosphere .................... 86 3.4 The Homunculus in Medias Res .................................................................................. 89 3.5 The Speculative Chimera ............................................................................................. 96 3.6 Concluding Thoughts ................................................................................................. 104 4.0 Metaphoric Consensus: How “Quorum Sensing” Caught Fire ...................................... 112 4.1 Introduction: How Scientists Came to See Bacteria as Social ................................ 112 4.2 Conceptual Re-genesis: Multicellularity .................................................................. 122 vi 4.3 The Birth of a Term: From Autoinduction to Quorum Sensing ............................ 128 4.4 Quorum Sensing and Burke’s Master Tropes: Metaphor, Metonym, Synecdoche, Irony ................................................................................................................................... 136 4.4.1 Metaphor/Perspective ..................................................................................... 137 4.4.2 Metonymy/Reduction ...................................................................................... 142 4.4.3 Synecdoche/Representation ............................................................................ 148 4.4.4 Irony/Dialectic ................................................................................................. 151 4.5 Concluding Thoughts: Inherent Values of “Mere” Metaphors ............................. 153 5.0 Human Boundary Seepage, Bacterial Rhetorics .............................................................. 157 5.1 Introduction: Microbes and Rhetoric? ..................................................................... 157 5.2 Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Non-Symbolic Motion? Symbolic Action? ............................................................................................................................... 160 5.3 Bacterial Communications, Human Bodies ............................................................. 168 5.4 Identification, Suggestibility, and Affective Transmission ..................................... 176 5.5 Concluding Thoughts ................................................................................................. 185 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 188 vii List of Figures Figure 2-1 Engelmann's Action Spectrum Experiment. ......................................................... 17 Figure 2-2 Fine Structure and Isolation of the Hook-Basal Body Complex of Flagella from Escherichia coliand Bacillus subtilis (dimensions in nanometers).M. L. DePamphilis, Julius Adler. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 1, 1971, © American Society for Microbiology.............................................................................................................. 41 Figure 2-3 “The Boss”. Annual Review of Biochemistry, Vol. 80, 2011, Julius Adler. ........ 50 Figure 2-4 E. coli. Elizabeth H. White, M.S. Centers for Disease Control. 1995, Public Domain. ............................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 2-5 “Treponema Pallidum” (syphilis spirochete). Dr. David Cox. CDC, Public domain. ............................................................................................................................. 52 Figure 3-1 Spirochete bacterium, CDC, Susan Lindsley. Public Domain. .......................... 56 Figure 3-2 Endosymbiosis. Joran Martijn, Ettema Lab, Uppsala University ...................... 58 Figure 3-3 Example of a Protoctist. From: Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution by Lynn Margulis, copyright © 1998, 1999. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books, an imprint of Hachette Book Group, Inc. .......................................................................... 72 Figure 3-4 Cluster of syphilis spirochetes, CDC, David Cox, Public Domain. ..................... 75 Figure 3-5 Cluster of Neurons, Manchester Univerity, 2015. ................................................. 75 Figure 3-6 Difflugia urceolota, with a blunt spine, closed by a grain. Credit: F.J. Siemensma. ..........................................................................................................................................