Persecution Onhuman Rights Defenders and Human Rights Ngos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Persecution Onhuman Rights Defenders and Human Rights Ngos Persecution on Human Rights Defenders and Human Rights NGOs at the Post-Soviet Area: Key Tendencies 2011 - 2013 Content INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….….4 SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND REPORT STRUCTURE……………………...…………...…8 PART 1. PERSECUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS CHAPTER 1. LIFE VIOLATIONS……………………………………………………………….13 1.2. Disappearances ………………………………………………………………………………..16 CHAPTER 2. HEALTH VIOLATIONS (ATTACKS, BEATING) ………………………………17 Chapter 3. TORTURES, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT …………….………….25 3.1. Tortures and degrading treatment during arrests, detention and investigation …………..……26 3.2. Degrading treatment in detention ……………………………………………………..….……30 Chapter 4. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ………………………………………………..….……..32 4.1. Unfounded initiation of criminal proceedings ……………………………………….…..…….33 4.2. Criminal sentencing with deprivation of liberty ……………………………………….…...… 41 4.3. Criminal sentencing without deprivation of liberty (fine, conditional sentence)………..……. 51 Chapter 5. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS ……………………………………………..…55 5.1. Arbitrary detention……………………………………………………………………..…..…. 56 5.2. Fining…………………………………………………………………………………..…...…. 58 5.3. Administrative arrest ………………………………………………………………...…….…..63 5.4. Other forms of administrative pressure…………………………………………….……….….68 Chapter 6. OTHER FORMS OF DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY ………………………..……….70 6.1. Restriction of freedom to move……………………………………………………………….. 71 6.2. Attempts of compulsory psychiatric treatment…………………………………………...…… 73 Chapter 7. CHANGES WITH DEFAMATION…..……………………………………...…..…….74 Chapter 8. DEATH THREATS AND THREATS OF SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM……….......78 Chapter 9. DISCREDITING……………..…………………………………………………….….. 83 Chapter 10. HARASSMENT / PRESSURE ON RELATIVES OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS……………………………………………………………………………………… 88 Chapter 11. PROPERTY DAMAGE ………………………………………………………………91 Chapter 12. OTHER RESTRICTIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS` ACTIVITIES…. 92 12.1. Searches and interrogations ………………………………………………………….……….93 12.2. Tax inspections………………………………………………………………………….…… 96 2 12.3. Dismissing, intimidation on being dismissed and dropping out of professional unions ….. 98 12.4. Blocking access to the web-sites …………………………………………………………..100 12.5. Threats of extradition ……………………………………………………………………...103 PART 2. ENVIRONMENT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS NGOS: LEGISLATION AND ATTITUDES Legal Framework for NGOs…………………………………..………………………………..…106 Azerbaijan ……………………………………………………..…….……………………………109 Armenia…………………………………………………………………………………………... 114 Belarus……………………………………………………………………………………………. 116 Georgia…………………………………………………………..………………………………...121 Kazakhstan……………………………………………………...………………………………... 124 Kyrgyzstan………………………………………………………..……………………………… 126 Moldova…………………………………………………………….……………………………. 127 Russia……………………………………………………………………….……………………. 129 Tajikistan…………………………………………………………………….…………………… 139 Turkmenistan ……………………………………………………………………………………...143 Uzbekistan…………………………………………………………………….………………….. 145 Ukraine …………………………………………………………………...……………………….147 3 INTRODUCTION Human rights defenders are the particular group whose freedom of activity is the direct indicator of the general level of respect to human rights in the state. Due to specific of their work on promotion and protection of human rights the human rights defenders often became a target for threats, attacks and harassment. Recognizing this fact, the United Nations in the year 1998 adopted a document that became to be known as a Declaration on Human Rights Defenders1. Although this document is not legally binding itself, it gathers the provisions of other documents which possess such force (Conventions and Covenants directly related to the rights of human rights defenders). There is indicated in the Declaration a direct responsibility of states to adopt such different steps as may be necessary to ensure that the rights and freedoms of those, who take advantage of the right to protect human rights, are fulfilled. Among others, the Declaration asserts such rights as: right to promote and protect human rights; freedom of expression; to solicit, receive and utilize resources for the express purpose of promoting and protecting human rights; right to know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights right to complain about the policies and actions of individual officials and governmental bodies with regard to violations of human rights; right to be protected internationally. In the year 2000 the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders (Special Representative of the Secretary General) had been established to support implementation of the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders. According to this Declaration, human rights defenders are those who "promote and strive for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms" individually and in association with others. The term "human rights defenders" cannot mean only the representative of non-government (human rights) organizations. The human rights defenders should not be treated as some sort of special legal category and should not have any special privileges that distinguish them from other people; but in the case of offenses committed against them because of their activities, human rights defenders should be given special guarantees of protection. Besides, protection of human rights defenders means at the same time protection of survivors of human rights violations by giving them possibility to be heard and keeping their contacts with the organizations working to protect their rights. The lineament of the human rights defenders is their commitment to values they promote. There are different people among them, but all human rights defenders respect the universality and the indivisibility of human rights. They share the point of view that all people, regardless of their gender, race, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, etc., should enjoy all the rights. Human right activists are those who promote and protect human rights peacefully and with no violence2 (marked by editors). 1 Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedomsadopted by the Resolution of General Assembly, A/RES/53/144 on December 9, 1998; http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/770/89/PDF/N9977089.pdf?OpenElement 2 http://www.hfhrpol.waw.pl/uzbek/ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76:2009-12-04-11-06- 56&catid=36:teksty-o-prawach-czowieka-i-demokracji 4 Gathering and disseminating information, advocacy and the mobilization of public opinion are often the most common tools used by human rights defenders in their work. They work at democratic transformation in order to increase the participation of people in the decision-making that shapes their lives and to strengthen good governance. They also contribute to the improvement of social, political and economic conditions, the reduction of social and political tensions, the building of peace, domestically and internationally, and the nurturing of national and international awareness of human rights3. It is clear that independent human rights activities are possible only under condition when at least minimal standards of the freedom of speech and access to information, right to meet or assemble peacefully are fulfilled. The barriers for human rights activity appears when these freedoms are unfairly limited and consequently human rights defenders necessarily meet pressure and different forms of intervention in their work by government. The human rights defenders should be able to implement their activities on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, guaranteed under the national law and protected internationally, regardless of the twists and turns of political struggle and the domestic political context. Such pattern allows other civic groups, such as volunteer, environmental, children's, service organizations, etc., to function normally as well. The human rights activity is an important factor for prevention of social conflicts as well; it if one of the forms for suspense diminishment and it is an impact for setting dialog between the government and society. The authorities, who do not realize this issue and rely on force to resolve conflicts together with drift from the law, risk bringing the situation to the social upheavals, accompanied by ever-increasing levels of aggression and violence. Besides of the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, mentioned above, this function of human rights defenders is recognized by number of international human rights instruments that foresee a scope of guarantees for human rights activity. At the regional level there is a Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on Council of Europe action to improve the protection of human rights defenders and promote their activities4. There are specific protections provided to human rights defenders, including the rights: 1. To seek the protection and realization of human rights at the national and international levels 2. To conduct human rights work individually and in association with others; 3. To form associations and non-governmental organizations; 4. To meet or assemble peacefully; 5. To seek, obtain, receive and hold information relating to human rights; 6. To develop and discuss new human rights ideas and principles and to advocate their acceptance; 7. To submit to governmental bodies and agencies and organizations concerned with public affairs criticism and proposals for improving their functioning and to
Recommended publications
  • Russia 2012-2013: Attack on Freedom / 3 Introduction
    RUSSIA 2012-2013 : Attack on Freedom Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, February 2014 / N°625a Cover photo: Demonstration in front of the State Duma (Russian Parliament) in Moscow on 18 July 2013, after the conviction of Alexei Navalny. © AFP PHOTO / Ivan Novikov 2 / Titre du rapport – FIDH Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 1. Authoritarian Methods to Suppress Rights and Freedoms -------------------------------- 6 2. Repressive Laws ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.1. Restrictions on Freedom
    [Show full text]
  • FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note D’Analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS
    FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note d’analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS Février 2012 SOMMAIRE I. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 1. Présentation de la mission ................................................................................................. 3 2. Contexte du procès : la situation des défenseurs des droits de l’homme en Russie ...................................................................................... 3 3. L’impact du procès Ramzan Kadyrov contre Oleg Orlov sur l’ensemble de la société civile russe .......................................................................... 3 II. Le procès contre Oleg Orlov et Memorial : deux ans et demi de menace...................... 5 1. Le procès au civil ................................................................................................................ 5 2. Le procès au pénal ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Le procès pénal en appel ................................................................................................. 7 III. Un coup porté à la communauté des défenseurs des droits de l’homme ...................... 9 1. Une victoire en demi teinte pour Memorial .................................................................... 9 2. La mobilisation des défenseurs russes ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2020 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lack independence from the executive. The 2016 State Duma elections and the 2018 presidential election were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process, including the exclusion of meaningful opposition candidates. On July 1, a national vote held on constitutional amendments did not meet internationally recognized electoral standards. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Security Service, the Investigative Committee, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the National Guard are responsible for law enforcement. The Federal Security Service is responsible for state security, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism, as well as for fighting organized crime and corruption. The national police force, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for combating all crime. The National Guard assists the Federal Security Service’s Border Guard Service in securing borders, administers gun control, combats terrorism and organized crime, protects public order, and guards important state facilities. The National Guard also participates in armed defense of the country’s territory in coordination with Ministry of Defense forces. Except in rare cases, security forces generally report to civilian authorities. National-level civilian authorities have, at best, limited control over security forces in the Republic of Chechnya, which are accountable only to the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Members of the Russian security forces committed numerous human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORIAL Leningrad Were Buried During World War II
    NO. 3 1795 САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ-ТАЙМС WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 2014 WWW.SPTIMES.RU DMITRY LOVETSKY / AP LOVETSKY DMITRY Valentina Kiseleva, 76, who remained in Leningrad during the blockade, walks past a wreath at the Piskaryovskoye Cemetery where most victims of the Siege of MEMORIAL Leningrad were buried during World War II. More than 1 million people died during the 872-day siege, which was finally lifted on Jan. 27, 1944. SOCHI BUSINESS Billion-Dollar Postal Blues LOCAL Doubts Linger Blockade Over Games Survivors Honored With less than ten days to go The Boris Eifman before they start, the Sochi troupe honors Olympics are still dividing Consumers caught up in battle veterans. Page 3. local opinion. Page 8. over e-commerce. Page 6. LocalNews www.sptimes.ru | Wednesday, January 29, 2014 ❖ 2 Local Activists Protest in Kiev VK Founder Durov By Sergey Chernov THE ST. PETERSBURG TIMES Sells Stake in Website St. Petersburg’s liberal and left-wing ac- tivists have offered their support to the RIA NOVOSTI said it was probably based on the protests currently taking place in Pavel Durov, the founder of company’s value of $3-4 billion. Ukraine with one-man rallies and pick- VKontakte, said on Jan. 24 that he Previous media reports said ets, a vigil and visits to Kiev. Pickets had sold his stake in the immensely that Durov and his VKontakte have been held near the Consulate Gen- popular social-networking website team were planning to quit and eral of Ukraine and on Nevsky Prospekt that has often been dubbed “Rus- engage in a new project, but his since mid-week while on Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012
    Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 Norwegian Helsinki Committee Established in 1977 The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) is a non-governmental organisation that works to promote respect for human rights, nationally and internationally. Its work is based on the conviction that documentation and active promotion of human rights by civil society is needed for states to secure human rights, at home and in other countries. NHC bases its work on international human rights instruments adopted by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. The main areas of focus for the NHC are the countries of Europe, North America and Central Asia. The NHC works irrespective of ideology or political system in these countries and maintains political neutrality. How wE work Human rigHts monitoring and reporting Through monitoring and reporting on problematic human rights situations in specific countries, the NHC sheds light on violations of human rights. The NHC places particular emphasis on civil and political rights, including the fundamental freedoms of expression, belief, association and assembly. On-site research and close co-operation with key civil society actors are our main working methods. The NHC has expertise in election observation and has sent numerous observer missions to elections over the last two decades. support of democratic processes By sharing knowledge and with financial assistance, the NHC supports local initiatives for the promotion of an independent civil society and public institutions as well as a free media. A civil society that functions well is a precondition for the development of democracy education and information Through education and information about democracy and human rights, international law and multicultural understanding, we work to increase the focus on human rights violations.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the Beginning of the ХХІ Century
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE OF UKRAINE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES AND PEDAGOGY Department of History and Political Sciences N. KRAVCHENKO History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the beginning of the ХХІ century Textbook for students of English-speaking groups Kyiv 2017 UDК 93/94 (477) BBК: 63.3 (4 Укр) К 77 Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine (Protocol № 3, on October 25, 2017). Reviewers: Kostylyeva Svitlana Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of the National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»; Vyhovskyi Mykola Yuriiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Faculty of Historical Education of the National Pedagogical Drahomanov University Вilan Serhii Oleksiiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History and Political Sciences of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Аristova Natalia Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of English Philology of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Author: PhD, Associate Professor Nataliia Borysivna Kravchenko К 77 Kravchenko N. B. History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ - the beginning of the ХХІ century. Textbook for students of English-speaking groups. / Kravchenko N. B. – Куiv: Еditing and Publishing Division NUBiP of Ukraine, 2017. – 412 р. ISBN 978-617-7396-79-5 The textbook-reference covers the historical development of Ukraine Statehood in the ХХ- at the beginning of the ХХІ century. The composition contains materials for lectures, seminars and self-study. It has general provisions, scientific and reference materials - personalities, chronology, terminology, documents and manual - set of tests, projects and recommended literature.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation
    MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Science Fiction Movies in the Mirror of Film Criticism and Viewers’ Opinions
    Alexander Fedorov Soviet science fiction movies in the mirror of film criticism and viewers’ opinions Moscow, 2021 Fedorov A.V. Soviet science fiction movies in the mirror of film criticism and viewers’ opinions. Moscow: Information for all, 2021. 162 p. The monograph provides a wide panorama of the opinions of film critics and viewers about Soviet movies of the fantastic genre of different years. For university students, graduate students, teachers, teachers, a wide audience interested in science fiction. Reviewer: Professor M.P. Tselysh. © Alexander Fedorov, 2021. 1 Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 1. Soviet science fiction in the mirror of the opinions of film critics and viewers ………………………… 4 2. "The Mystery of Two Oceans": a novel and its adaptation ………………………………………………….. 117 3. "Amphibian Man": a novel and its adaptation ………………………………………………………………….. 122 3. "Hyperboloid of Engineer Garin": a novel and its adaptation …………………………………………….. 126 4. Soviet science fiction at the turn of the 1950s — 1960s and its American screen transformations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 130 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 136 Filmography (Soviet fiction Sc-Fi films: 1919—1991) ……………………………………………………………. 138 About the author …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 150 References……………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………….. 155 2 Introduction This monograph attempts to provide a broad panorama of Soviet science fiction films (including television ones) in the mirror of
    [Show full text]
  • The New Chechnya. What Happened After the Two Wars
    Corso di Laurea magistrale (ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004) in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Tesi di Laurea The new Chechnya. What happened after the two wars. Relatore Ch. Prof. Aldo Ferrari Correlatore Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Laureando Camilla Cairo Matricola 845532 Anno Accademico 2013/2014 Index Abstract p. 1 Introduction p. 4 Chapter I Historic background 1. Introduction to Chechnya: Religion, Society, Law p. 6 2. The Jihad and the Russian Conquest p. 10 3. Stalin’s Policy: the Deportation p. 14 4. The Early Nineties: the First Chechen War p. 16 5. From the Independence to the Second Chechen War p. 23 Chapter II What happened after the two wars? 1. The Chechenization Policy p. 29 a. Monetary Aid from the Federal Government to Chechnya p. 32 b. The Reconstruction of Grozny p. 36 c. The New, Traditional Islam p. 39 d. Cooptation and Terror p. 43 2. Limits of the Chechenization Process p. 47 Chapter III Terrorism Issue 1. Separatism and Fundamentalism p. 49 2. Terrorist Attacks p. 55 3. How to End Terrorism p. 65 Chapter IV Human Rights 1. Memorial and Human Rights Activists’ Situation of Hostility in Russia p. 71 2. The European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee against Torture p. 76 3. Human Rights Violations Connected to Islam and Other Examples p. 82 4. “Chechnya With No Traces of war” p. 87 Chapter V Ramzan Kadyrov and the Future of Chechnya 1. Ramzan Kadyrov and the Cult of Personality p. 90 2. Chechnya’s Future Within the North Caucasus Region p.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT on most significant events of 2014 radio year and core trends in streaming broadcast and music industry' development of 2015 Part 1 – RADIO STARS & RADIO HITS ООО “СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ МЕДИА ТЕХНОЛОГИИ”, 127018 РОССИЯ, МОСКВА, СТАРОПЕТРОВСКИЙ ПРОЕЗД, ДОМ 11, КОРП. 1, ОФИС 111, +7 (495) 645 78 55, +44 20 7193 7003, +1 (347) 274 88 41, +49 69 5780 1997, WWW.TOPHIT.RU CONTENTS Introduction.………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Radio stars and radio hits…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Artists and songs – Top Hit Music Awards 2015 winners…….…………………………………………………….……… 6 Achievements of record labels in 2014…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Top 10 of Companies with biggest number of spins on radio air……………………..……………………………….. 8 Top 10 Companies with biggest number of songs on radio air …………………………………………………………. 9 Top 10 Companies with biggest number of spins per each song………………………………………………………. 10 Top 10 Companies with biggest number of songs on TOP HIT 100 radio chart…………………………………. 11 Top 10 Companies with best song test results …………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Top 100 of most frequently rotated local and foreign songs on Moscow radio air 2014…………………… 13 Top 20 of hot rotation playlists, set music trends on Moscow radio air 2014.…………………………………… 15 2015: Top Hit 3.0 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 About the author……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 20 1 ООО “СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ МЕДИА ТЕХНОЛОГИИ” 125130 РОССИЯ МОСКВА СТАРОПЕТРОВСКИЙ ПРОЕЗД, 11, КОРП. 1, ОФИС 102 +7 495 645 7855 +44 20 7193 7003 +1 347 274 8841 +49 69 5780 1997 WWW.TOPHIT.RU Introduction Every day hundreds of millions of people listen to radio, driving their cars. Music, news, programs and advertising are delivered in single information flows to listeners. Today the radio air brodcast is gradually replaced by the Internet streaming, and the place of customary radiostations and TV sets is more often taken by desktops, tablet PCs and smartphones with various entertainment apps in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No
    Russia HUMAN Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No. 1(D) Choking on Bureaucracy State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism I. Summary............................................................................................................... 1 Methodology.......................................................................................................5 II. Recommendations ...............................................................................................7 To the Russian Government.................................................................................7 With regard to the 2006 NGO law...................................................................7 To safeguard the work and role of NGOs in general ........................................7 To Russia’s International Partners, particularly the European Union and the Council of Europe............................................................................................... 8 To Donors .......................................................................................................... 9 III. Background.......................................................................................................10 Dismantling Checks and Balances.....................................................................10 Crackdown on Dissent and Political Opposition................................................. 12 Adoption of the 2006 NGO Law ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe?
    MEMORIAL Civic Human Rights Centre Assistance Migration and Law Network Committee Svetlana Gannushkina Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe? Moscow 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 I. Despotism of Ramzan Kadyrov’s regime 9 II. Fabrication of criminal charges and evidence 11 III. Women in Chechnya 20 IV. Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia 23 V. The need for resettlement of refugees 28 Appendicies 31 Appendix 1. The Story of Shamil Soltamuradov 31 Appendix 2. Persecution of the Mazurkevich Family in the Chechen Republic 33 Appendix 3. OA’s story 38 Appendix 4. Syrian refugees in Russia 41 Appendix 5. Protection of the Rights of Residents of North Caucasus Who Serve Sentences in the Russian Penal System (2015 – 2018) 51 Introduction INTRODUCTION This report is yet another attempt to draw the attention of the European Union migration authorities to the fact that mass deportations of Russian citizens applying for asylum in Europe violate the principles of international law. The mass deportations of Russians began in 2014, which coincided with the publication of our previous report “Chechens in Russia.” This report describes many of the difficulties faced by Chechens—the main population seeking refuge from Russia1. We will continue bringing the attention to issues faced by Chechens in this report, but also expand to other populations in Russia. It is important to note that the situation in Chechnya has not changed, and all of the issues described in our 2014 report continue to affect countless citizens. The population of Chechnya today lives in even greater fear of the Kadyrov regime’s unchecked power; corruption and extortion flourish, and a wide variety of human rights violations are committed through justification of observing (misinterpreted and abused) traditions.
    [Show full text]