DOCSLIB.ORG

The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center «Peace, Progress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

mission/activities page 01 The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center «Peace, Progress, Human Rights» The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center is both a cultural institution and a public organization promoting the formation of civil society in Russia. It was established by the Public Commission for the Preservation of the Heritage of Academician Sakharov – Andrei Sakharov Foundation, chaired at the time by E. Bonner and, subsequently (since 2005), by S. Kovalev. The Museum and Public Center opened 21 May 1996, on the 75th anniversary of Sakharov's birth. Permanent exhibits, temporary exhibitions, the library, and museum collections are dedicated to three main issues: «Totalitarian past», «Conditions of freedom – issues that currently face Russia», «The life and activities of Andrei Sakharov». The Museum and Public Center often initiates and organ izes discussions on urgent societal and political issues and grants, free of charge, its facilities for sem inars, conferences and other public events to organizations whose goals do not contradict the mission of the Museum and Public Center. The Museum occupies a small mansion that was part of a 17th19th century estate last owned by the Usachev – Naydenov merchant family. The premises housing the Museum and Public Center have been granted by the Moscow City Government free of rent until 2021. Reconstruction of the building was accomplished by architect Grigory Sayevich, and the permanent collection was designed by architect Yevgeni Ass. Exposition equipment was developed, produced and mounted by Bioinjector IPK. The design of the Round Table Room incorporates works by artists Svetlana Assiryants and Daniel Mitlyansky and Maksim Mitlyansky. In 2000, The Museum and Public Center was granted the status of an Autonomous NonCommercial Organization. The organization is managed by the Board of Directors. Grants and donations are the principal sources of operational funding. Mission of the Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center – To contribute to the preservation of the historic memory of tens of millions of victims of the politi cal repressions and crimes of the Soviet regime – To contribute to the establishment of the values of an open democratic society and state in today's Russia, as advocated and shared by Andrei Sakharov Major activities of the Museum and Public Center – Archive and museum activities – Arrangement of exhibitions – Defense of human rights – Educational and instructive programs – Arrangement of seminars and conferences – Editorial and publishing activities – Participation in the implementation of Andrei Sakharov Fund programs and projects page 03 «I believe that mankind will find a rational solution to the challenging task of implementing grandiose necessary and inevitable progress, at the same time maintaining the human in man and the natural in nature.» Andrei Sakharov major sections page 05 The Totalitarian Past of Russia: The Totalitarian Past of Russia: «Mythology and ideology of the USSR» and «Political repressions in the USSR» «The way through GULAG» and «Resistance to «Unfreedom» Temporary exhibitions: «Problems of today's Russia» «Andrei Sakharov: Personality and Destiny» major sections page 07 The Museum's Permanent Exhibition presents Soviet history as seen through the prism of political repressions and resistance to the regime. In Moscow, it was the first exhibition open to the common pub lic in memory of the millions sacrificed in the name of communist Utopia. The artistic design of the exhibition was developed by architect Yevgeni Ass. The main idea of the exhibition is a metaphoric movement from «unfreedom» to freedom, from darkness to light. The exhibition space is divided into four naves (corridors) by high walls. The walls serve not only as places for exhibits, but as symbols of chang ing epochs, as well. By means of a variety of materials (brick, metal, wood, glass, textile), the dark and gloomy at the start of the route, becomes more spacious, light and bright on the way to its end. The proj I II III VI V ect was implemented by teams of young architects «Architect Lab» and «IceCoating (Obledenenie) of Architects», «Bioinjector» Company. In 1997, the Museum's Permanent Exhibit project was awarded the prize «For the best interior» at the Moscow Architecture Competition held during the «Architecture and Design» Fair. The first authors to contribute to the major sections of the exhibition included Nikita Okhotin, Leonid Litinsky, and Galina Averbukh. In 19982003, the material content of the exposition was renewed, but its concept remained the same. The authors of the renewed exposition were Lyudmila Vasilovskaya, Aleksandr Yermolaev, Andrei Ivanov, Yuri Samodurov, and Maria Kudyukina. The exhibits' design and mounting were accomplished by the archi tects of «masterskayataf», headed by Aleksandr Yermolaev. Major sections: I Mythology and Ideology of the USSR II Political Repressions in the USSR III The Way Through GULAG IV Resistance to «Unfreedom» the structure of the exposition V Andrei Sakharov: Personality and Destiny section #1 mythology & ideology of the USSR page 09 mythology and ideolo1gy of the USSR Mythology and Ideology of the USSR The first section of the Exhibition presents a win dowdressing of Soviet socialism in the form of a bright, colorful collage of photos, posters, lines from Soviet songs and slogans. This is propaganda of the Soviet way of life: subjugation of nature, friendship of nations, labor exploits, festive demonstrations, military parades, sports festivals, progress achieved in science, technology and culture, unity of the Party and the people. The purpose of the propaganda was to inspire faith in the inevitable victory of communism. The idea of building a communist society rested on man's ageold dreams of a just social order, material abundance, free and joyful labor, a world without violence, private property, exploitation, and a world without the poor (but, at the same time, without the rich). Vladimir Lenin declared: «the Russian mass public has to be presented with something extremely simple, intelligible to its comprehension. Soviets and communism are simple enough». Up to that point, the Bolshevik Party had led the Utopian project. The party enjoyed absolute power in politics, the economy and ideology. It controlled society in order to nip all doubts and deviations in the bud. The citizens of the Soviet state were assured that every day they made fresh advances on their way to the glorious future. But the attainment of these objectives required sacrifices. There was no coincidence in the frequent use of combat terminology: struggle for worldwide victory of the revolution, struggle for lib eration of oppressed nations, struggle for peace in the world, struggle for harvest, for cleanliness, for the new way of life, for the upbringing of a new man, for the accomplishment of housing and foodproduction programs, etc. The ideological machinery of the State succeeded in creating an illusory vision of national life, and a considerable part of society responded with genuine enthusiasm. And it was natural that the guiding and organizing role played by the Communist Party and its leaders was emphasized permanently throughout the whole Soviet period of history. As soon as the majority of citizens realized the gap between the image of propaganda's «bright future» and reality, the fall of the Soviet regime became just a matter of time. раздел #1 mythology & ideology of the USSR page 11 section #2 political repressions in the USSR page 13 Political Repressions in the USSR The second section of the Exhibition deals with the his tory of political repressions in the USSR in the period from 1917 to the mid1950's. The socalled dictatorship of the proletariat in the person of the Bolshevik Party considered it inevitable to start the political repressions in the USSR construction of a new society with total repression against real and potential enemies of the regime. Early II on, opposition newspapers were closed, rival political parties banned, the Constituent Assembly was dis missed, and former landlords, noblemen, entrepreneurs, clergymen, army and police officers were deprived of suffrage. However, as time went by, it became clear that repressions were not a temporal measure but the very essence of the new regime. A few months after the revolution passed, a policy of enforcement was applied to peasantry (the most numerous segment of Russia's population) in the form of «pro drazverstka» (surplus appropriation system). This made civil war inevitable. The main instrument of civil war was terror – «red» and «white». After the war, many prominent representatives of humanitarian intelligentsia were exiled abroad and the party of socialist revolutionaries (SR) was set on trial (1922). Meanwhile, the Church suffered a fatal attack: its valuables were confiscated in the interest of the struggle against hunger; many priests were arrested and shot. In 1928, the socalled «Shakhty case» became a rehearsal for political show trials of the 1930's. In the late 1920'searly 1930's, dispossession of kulaks (wealthy peasants) and mass collectivization resulted in plunder and exile to remote areas of millions of peasant families. So far, independent peasantry was eliminated. The horrible hunger of 19321933 with 7 million starved to death was a direct conse quence of this policy. In the early 1930's, the system of Main Administration for Camps (abbre viated in Russian as GULAG) was formed. Inefficient forced labor of convicts was implied in construction
Recommended publications
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1985

    The Ukrainian Weekly 1985

    Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fraternal non-profit association! rainian Weekly Vol. Llll No. 6 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1985 25 cents Congressmen urge humane treatment CSCE nominates lights activists for political prisoners' families for 1985 Nobel Peace Prize WASHINGTON - Ninety year earlier. His father was sentenced in congressmen have co-signed a letter late 1974 to 10 years' labor camp and urging Soviet leader Konstantin exile. Chernenko to provide "more humane In the January 29 letter, the treatment" for members of two families congressmen cited recent reports that incarcerated for their political activities. authorities had interrupted The families- are Ukrainian human- correspondence between the Kovalevs rights activist Mykola Rudenko and his and banned visits between Mr. Kovalev wife, Raisa, and political prisoners Ivan and his wife. Kovalev. his wife. Tatiana Osipova. and They also urged that visits and his father. Sergei Kovalev, who is in correspondence be resumed between exile. Mr. Rudenko and his wife, and that Mr. Rudenko. 63, was a founding both families be given "proper medical member in 1976 of the Ukrainian attention." According to the letter, Ms. Helsinki Group, which was established Osipova and Sergei Kovalev are "in to monitor Soviet compliance with the need of hospitali?ation." Helsinki Accords on human rights and security in Europe. In 1978 he was The congressmen said they had Nominees for the 1985 information indicating that the two sentenced tasever+years-inalaber-eamp - Nobel Peace Prize: (clock­ and five years' internal exile, which he is families were "not being treated in wise from top left) My­ now serving in Gorno-Altayskaya accordance with the spirit of the kola Rudenko of the Autonomous Oblast.
  • The Siloviki in Russian Politics

    The Siloviki in Russian Politics

    The Siloviki in Russian Politics Andrei Soldatov and Michael Rochlitz Who holds power and makes political decisions in contemporary Russia? A brief survey of available literature in any well-stocked bookshop in the US or Europe will quickly lead one to the answer: Putin and the “siloviki” (see e.g. LeVine 2009; Soldatov and Borogan 2010; Harding 2011; Felshtinsky and Pribylovsky 2012; Lucas 2012, 2014 or Dawisha 2014). Sila in Russian means force, and the siloviki are the members of Russia’s so called “force ministries”—those state agencies that are authorized to use violence to respond to threats to national security. These armed agents are often portrayed—by journalists and scholars alike—as Russia’s true rulers. A conventional wisdom has emerged about their rise to dominance, which goes roughly as follows. After taking office in 2000, Putin reconsolidated the security services and then gradually placed his former associates from the KGB and FSB in key positions across the country (Petrov 2002; Kryshtanovskaya and White 2003, 2009). Over the years, this group managed to disable almost all competing sources of power and control. United by a common identity, a shared worldview, and a deep personal loyalty to Putin, the siloviki constitute a cohesive corporation, which has entrenched itself at the heart of Russian politics. Accountable to no one but the president himself, they are the driving force behind increasingly authoritarian policies at home (Illarionov 2009; Roxburgh 2013; Kasparov 2015), an aggressive foreign policy (Lucas 2014), and high levels of state predation and corruption (Dawisha 2014). While this interpretation contains elements of truth, we argue that it provides only a partial and sometimes misleading and exaggerated picture of the siloviki’s actual role.
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
  • FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note D’Analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS

    FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note D’Analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS

    FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note d’analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS Février 2012 SOMMAIRE I. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 1. Présentation de la mission ................................................................................................. 3 2. Contexte du procès : la situation des défenseurs des droits de l’homme en Russie ...................................................................................... 3 3. L’impact du procès Ramzan Kadyrov contre Oleg Orlov sur l’ensemble de la société civile russe .......................................................................... 3 II. Le procès contre Oleg Orlov et Memorial : deux ans et demi de menace...................... 5 1. Le procès au civil ................................................................................................................ 5 2. Le procès au pénal ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Le procès pénal en appel ................................................................................................. 7 III. Un coup porté à la communauté des défenseurs des droits de l’homme ...................... 9 1. Une victoire en demi teinte pour Memorial .................................................................... 9 2. La mobilisation des défenseurs russes ...........................................................................
  • Reform and Human Rights the Gorbachev Record

    Reform and Human Rights the Gorbachev Record

    100TH-CONGRESS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES [ 1023 REFORM AND HUMAN RIGHTS THE GORBACHEV RECORD REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES BY THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE MAY 1988 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1988 84-979 = For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE STENY H. HOYER, Maryland, Chairman DENNIS DeCONCINI, Arizona, Cochairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TIMOTHY WIRTH, Colorado BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico WYCHE FOWLER, Georgia EDWARD FEIGHAN, Ohio HARRY REED, Nevada DON RITTER, Pennslyvania ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey JOHN HEINZ, Pennsylvania JACK F. KEMP, New York JAMES McCLURE, Idaho JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois MALCOLM WALLOP, Wyoming EXECUTIvR BRANCH HON. RICHARD SCHIFIER, Department of State Vacancy, Department of Defense Vacancy, Department of Commerce Samuel G. Wise, Staff Director Mary Sue Hafner, Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel Jane S. Fisher, Senior Staff Consultant Michael Amitay, Staff Assistant Catherine Cosman, Staff Assistant Orest Deychakiwsky, Staff Assistant Josh Dorosin, Staff Assistant John Finerty, Staff Assistant Robert Hand, Staff Assistant Gina M. Harner, Administrative Assistant Judy Ingram, Staff Assistant Jesse L. Jacobs, Staff Assistant Judi Kerns, Ofrice Manager Ronald McNamara, Staff Assistant Michael Ochs, Staff Assistant Spencer Oliver, Consultant Erika B. Schlager, Staff Assistant Thomas Warner, Pinting Clerk (11) CONTENTS Page Summary Letter of Transmittal .................... V........................................V Reform and Human Rights: The Gorbachev Record ................................................
  • Russia 2020 Human Rights Report

    Russia 2020 Human Rights Report

    RUSSIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lack independence from the executive. The 2016 State Duma elections and the 2018 presidential election were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process, including the exclusion of meaningful opposition candidates. On July 1, a national vote held on constitutional amendments did not meet internationally recognized electoral standards. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Security Service, the Investigative Committee, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the National Guard are responsible for law enforcement. The Federal Security Service is responsible for state security, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism, as well as for fighting organized crime and corruption. The national police force, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for combating all crime. The National Guard assists the Federal Security Service’s Border Guard Service in securing borders, administers gun control, combats terrorism and organized crime, protects public order, and guards important state facilities. The National Guard also participates in armed defense of the country’s territory in coordination with Ministry of Defense forces. Except in rare cases, security forces generally report to civilian authorities. National-level civilian authorities have, at best, limited control over security forces in the Republic of Chechnya, which are accountable only to the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Members of the Russian security forces committed numerous human rights abuses.
  • Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012

    Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012

    Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 Norwegian Helsinki Committee Established in 1977 The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) is a non-governmental organisation that works to promote respect for human rights, nationally and internationally. Its work is based on the conviction that documentation and active promotion of human rights by civil society is needed for states to secure human rights, at home and in other countries. NHC bases its work on international human rights instruments adopted by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. The main areas of focus for the NHC are the countries of Europe, North America and Central Asia. The NHC works irrespective of ideology or political system in these countries and maintains political neutrality. How wE work Human rigHts monitoring and reporting Through monitoring and reporting on problematic human rights situations in specific countries, the NHC sheds light on violations of human rights. The NHC places particular emphasis on civil and political rights, including the fundamental freedoms of expression, belief, association and assembly. On-site research and close co-operation with key civil society actors are our main working methods. The NHC has expertise in election observation and has sent numerous observer missions to elections over the last two decades. support of democratic processes By sharing knowledge and with financial assistance, the NHC supports local initiatives for the promotion of an independent civil society and public institutions as well as a free media. A civil society that functions well is a precondition for the development of democracy education and information Through education and information about democracy and human rights, international law and multicultural understanding, we work to increase the focus on human rights violations.
  • On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation

    On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation

    MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V.
  • The New Chechnya. What Happened After the Two Wars

    The New Chechnya. What Happened After the Two Wars

    Corso di Laurea magistrale (ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004) in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Tesi di Laurea The new Chechnya. What happened after the two wars. Relatore Ch. Prof. Aldo Ferrari Correlatore Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Laureando Camilla Cairo Matricola 845532 Anno Accademico 2013/2014 Index Abstract p. 1 Introduction p. 4 Chapter I Historic background 1. Introduction to Chechnya: Religion, Society, Law p. 6 2. The Jihad and the Russian Conquest p. 10 3. Stalin’s Policy: the Deportation p. 14 4. The Early Nineties: the First Chechen War p. 16 5. From the Independence to the Second Chechen War p. 23 Chapter II What happened after the two wars? 1. The Chechenization Policy p. 29 a. Monetary Aid from the Federal Government to Chechnya p. 32 b. The Reconstruction of Grozny p. 36 c. The New, Traditional Islam p. 39 d. Cooptation and Terror p. 43 2. Limits of the Chechenization Process p. 47 Chapter III Terrorism Issue 1. Separatism and Fundamentalism p. 49 2. Terrorist Attacks p. 55 3. How to End Terrorism p. 65 Chapter IV Human Rights 1. Memorial and Human Rights Activists’ Situation of Hostility in Russia p. 71 2. The European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee against Torture p. 76 3. Human Rights Violations Connected to Islam and Other Examples p. 82 4. “Chechnya With No Traces of war” p. 87 Chapter V Ramzan Kadyrov and the Future of Chechnya 1. Ramzan Kadyrov and the Cult of Personality p. 90 2. Chechnya’s Future Within the North Caucasus Region p.
  • Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No

    Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No

    Russia HUMAN Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No. 1(D) Choking on Bureaucracy State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism I. Summary............................................................................................................... 1 Methodology.......................................................................................................5 II. Recommendations ...............................................................................................7 To the Russian Government.................................................................................7 With regard to the 2006 NGO law...................................................................7 To safeguard the work and role of NGOs in general ........................................7 To Russia’s International Partners, particularly the European Union and the Council of Europe............................................................................................... 8 To Donors .......................................................................................................... 9 III. Background.......................................................................................................10 Dismantling Checks and Balances.....................................................................10 Crackdown on Dissent and Political Opposition................................................. 12 Adoption of the 2006 NGO Law ........................................................................
  • Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe?

    Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe?

    MEMORIAL Civic Human Rights Centre Assistance Migration and Law Network Committee Svetlana Gannushkina Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe? Moscow 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 I. Despotism of Ramzan Kadyrov’s regime 9 II. Fabrication of criminal charges and evidence 11 III. Women in Chechnya 20 IV. Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia 23 V. The need for resettlement of refugees 28 Appendicies 31 Appendix 1. The Story of Shamil Soltamuradov 31 Appendix 2. Persecution of the Mazurkevich Family in the Chechen Republic 33 Appendix 3. OA’s story 38 Appendix 4. Syrian refugees in Russia 41 Appendix 5. Protection of the Rights of Residents of North Caucasus Who Serve Sentences in the Russian Penal System (2015 – 2018) 51 Introduction INTRODUCTION This report is yet another attempt to draw the attention of the European Union migration authorities to the fact that mass deportations of Russian citizens applying for asylum in Europe violate the principles of international law. The mass deportations of Russians began in 2014, which coincided with the publication of our previous report “Chechens in Russia.” This report describes many of the difficulties faced by Chechens—the main population seeking refuge from Russia1. We will continue bringing the attention to issues faced by Chechens in this report, but also expand to other populations in Russia. It is important to note that the situation in Chechnya has not changed, and all of the issues described in our 2014 report continue to affect countless citizens. The population of Chechnya today lives in even greater fear of the Kadyrov regime’s unchecked power; corruption and extortion flourish, and a wide variety of human rights violations are committed through justification of observing (misinterpreted and abused) traditions.
  • The KGB in Kremlin Politics

    The KGB in Kremlin Politics

    FINAL REPORT TO NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : THE KGB IN KREMLIN POLITIC S AUTHOR : Jeremy R. Azrael Rand Corporation/UCLA CONTRACTOR : Rand/UCLA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Jeremy R. Azrael COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 801-4 DATE : September, 198 8 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . CONTENT S PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i v INTRODUCTION 1 THE SECRET POLICE AND THE ELIMINATION OF BERIA 4 THE SECRET POLICE IN THE MALENKOV-KHRUSHCHEV STRUGGLE 6 THE KGB AND THE " ANTI-PARTY GROUP " 1 1 THE KGB AND " THE ZHUKOV AFFAIR " 1 6 THE REPLACEMENT OF SEROV 2 0 CHAIRMAN SHELEPIN 2 2 THE FALL OF SHELEPIN 2 7 THE 1967 SETTLEMENT 3 0 THE DOWNFALLS OF AKHUNDOV AND SHELEST 3 3 THE RISE OF ANDROPOV 3 7 THE KGB AND THE BREZHNEV - ANDROPOV SUCCESSION 4 3 THE INTERREGNUM 4 6 THE CHEBRIKOV - GORBACHEV ALLIANCE 5 0 THE BREAKDOWN OF THE CHEBRIKOV - GORBACHEV ALLIANCE 5 3 CONCLUSION 6 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY WORKS CITED 68 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S This report has been prepared in fulfillment of a contract betwee n the RAND-UCLA Center for the Study of Soviet International Behavior an d the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . The autho r is indebted to both of these organizations for generous financial an d moral support . Sincere thanks also go to , Lilita Dzirkals and Te d Karasik, for their expert research assistance ; to Valerie Bernstein, to r her devoted secretarial services ; to Julia Azrael, for her help as a proofreader and editor ; and to Frank Fukuyama, Harry Gelman, and othe r colleagues who gave me the benefit of their critical comments an d suggestions on a draft version of the text .