DOCSLIB.ORG

Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride Fifth Report of Session 2010–11 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 October2010 HC 540 Published on 21 October 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and North Poole) Rt hon Tom Clarke MP (Labour, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Mr Geoffrey Cox MP (Conservative, Torridge and West Devon) Mr Jim Cunningham MP (Labour, Coventry South) Mr Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) Eric Ollerenshaw MP (Conservative, Lancaster and Fleetwood) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No. 149. In particular, the Committee has power to order the attendance of any Member of Parliament before the committee and to require that specific documents or records in the possession of a Member relating to its inquiries, or to the inquiries of the Commissioner, be laid before the Committee. The Committee has power to refuse to allow its public proceedings to be broadcast. The Law Officers, if they are Members of Parliament, may attend and take part in the Committee’s proceedings, but may not vote. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at: www.parliament.uk/sandp. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mr Steve Priestley (Clerk), Miss Rhiannon Hollis (Second Clerk) and Ms Jane Cooper (Committee Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to The Clerk of the Committee on Standards and Privileges, Journal Office, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6615. Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride 1 Contents Report Page Introduction 3 The Commissioner’s inquiry 3 The Commissioner’s findings: Mr Andrew Mackay 4 The Commissioner’s findings: Ms Julie Kirkbride 7 Conclusion: Ms Julie Kirkbride 9 Mr Mackay’s evidence 9 Conclusions and recommendation: Mr Andrew Mackay 10 Appendix 1: Memorandum from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 12 Complaints against the Rt hon Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride 15 Oral and Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 73 Appendix 2: Email to the Committee from Mr Andrew Mackay, 15 October, 2010139 Formal minutes 140 Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride 3 Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride Introduction 1. Mr Andrew Mackay was the Member of Parliament for Berkshire East and then Bracknell from 1983 to 2010. His wife, Ms Julie Kirkbride, was the Member for Bromsgrove from 1997 to 2010. They had homes in Bromsgrove and in London. For Parliamentary allowance purposes, the Bromsgrove property was Mr Mackay’s declared main home and Ms Kirkbride’s second home; the London property was Ms Kirkbride’s declared main home and Mr Mackay’s second home. 2. In October 2009, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards received a complaint from Mr Michael Goggins, a constituent of Ms Kirkbride, about the Additional Costs Allowance (ACA) claims made by both Ms Kirkbride and Mr Mackay. The complaint against Mr Mackay was that he had wrongly identified the Bromsgrove property as his main home for the purposes of making ACA claims. The complaint against Ms Kirkbride was that she had wrongly claimed against ACA for the cost of building an extension to the same property. 3. The Commissioner has produced a single memorandum reporting on his investigation into the complaints against both Mr Mackay and Ms Kirkbride. This is published at Appendix 1 to our Report. Mr Mackay submitted written evidence, which may be found at Appendix 2. The Commissioner’s inquiry 4. The Commissioner identifies two issues for him to resolve, as follows: whether Mr Mackay was acting within the rules of the House in identifying as his main home the Bromsgrove property he shared with his wife and fellow Member of Parliament, Ms Julie Kirkbride, when he knew that she had identified that home as her second home and would claim parliamentary allowances on it.1 and, whether Ms Kirkbride was within the rules of the House in claiming interest on the increased mortgage she took out in order to build an additional bedroom in her home in Bromsgrove when it was used by her brother principally to assist her with childcare and when no allowance was made by her for the cost of his use of the property.2 5. The Commissioner explains that, while he has considered the complaints against Mr Mackay and that against Ms Kirkbride separately and on their own merits, the two are linked, since, if Mr Mackay were within the rules in identifying the property in Bromsgrove 1 Appendix 1, paragraph 224 2 Appendix 1, paragraph 225 4 Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride as his main home, then he would need to consider whether Ms Kirkbride was within the rules in claiming for the interest on an additional mortgage to fund the cost of building works at what was, in fact, her husband’s main home.3 6. Both Mr Mackay and Ms Kirkbride argued that the Commissioner should not pursue the complaint, since to do so would put them in triple jeopardy, following the audit of Members’ allowance claims by Sir Thomas Legg and the subsequent appeals process carried out by Sir Paul Kennedy.4 7. Mr Mackay was judged by Sir Thomas Legg’s audit of Members’ ACA claims to have over-claimed in the period 2004–05 to 2008–09.5 Sir Thomas made the same finding in respect of Ms Kirkbride. Sir Thomas concluded that Mr Mackay and Ms Kirkbride jointly obtained a financial benefit by the designation of their main and second homes. He suggested that, had they made different designations, they might each have reasonably claimed up to two-thirds of the full allowance on a shared home. He therefore recommended that each repay one third of the sums they had claimed, £29,243. 8. In dismissing Mr Mackay’s and Ms Kirkbride’s appeals against the finding of Sir Thomas Legg, Sir Paul Kennedy wrote that Sir Thomas’s suggestion that Mr Mackay and Ms Kirkbride could reasonably have claimed up to two thirds of the full allowance was, if anything, generous. Sir Paul did not, however, have any power to increase the recommended repayment and Mr Mackay and Ms Kirkbride each repaid £29,243. 9. The Commissioner considers that, given the seriousness of the allegations, it was right that he should inquire into, and that the House of Commons should have an opportunity to decide on, whether two of its former Members (although they were Members at the time) breached the rules of the House and, if so, whether they should face Parliamentary sanction for their conduct.6 We agree with the Commissioner’s decision. The Commissioner’s findings: Mr Andrew Mackay 10. The Commissioner’s memorandum shows that Mr Mackay claimed against his ACA for the full mortgage interest and other costs of his London home from 1997 onwards. In the five years from 2004–05 to 2008–09, he claimed and was paid for his mortgage interest a total of £49,230.7 His total claims against ACA during this period came to more than £100,000.8 Information for earlier years is no longer available.9 11. Mr Mackay’s evidence to the Commissioner was that in or around September 1997, shortly after he had married Ms Kirkbride, he held a discussion with the then Head of the Fees Office, who told Mr Mackay that he and his wife could each choose which property to 3 Appendix 1, paragraph 226 4 Appendix 1, paragraph 227 5 First Report from the Members Estimate Committee, Session 2009–10, Review of past ACA payments 6 Appendix 1, paragraph 228 7 Appendix 1, paragraph 140 8 Appendix 1, WE13 9 Appendix 1, paragraph 141 Mr Andrew Mackay and Ms Julie Kirkbride 5 nominate as their main home and which as their second home. Mr Mackay told the Commissioner that the former Head recommended that Mr Mackay should designate the Bromsgrove property as his main home and claim ACA on the London property and that Ms Kirkbride should designate their London property as her main home. The former Head of the Fees Office told the Commissioner that, while he did not recall what advice he gave, he did not accept that he would have given the advice which Mr Mackay has suggested he gave.10 12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • How Leaders Can Better Navigate Cultural Change in 2020S Britain
    Dousing the Flames How leaders can better navigate cultural change in 2020s Britain Luke Tryl Conleth Burns Tim Dixon Page 5 Dousing the Flames How leaders can better navigate cultural change in 2020s Britain Luke Tryl Conleth Burns Tim Dixon ABOUT MORE IN COMMON More in Common is an international initiative set up in 2017 to build societies and communities that are stronger, more united, and more resilient to the increasing threats of polarisation and social division. Our teams in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States work in partnership with a wide range of civil society groups, as well as philanthropy, business, faith, education, media, and government to connect people across lines of division. More in Common www.moreincommon.com Principal Authors Luke Tryl – UK Director Conleth Burns – UK Associate Tim Dixon – Co-founder ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS More in Common appreciates the valuable input and advice relating to this study that we received from colleagues, experts, friends, and partners. For their assistance with many elements of this work, we would like to thank our colleagues and consultants: Will Brett, Hannah Barlow, Elisa Colton, Joe Higton, Míriam Juan-Torres, Arisa Kimaram, Julie Kirkbride, Lucy MacDonald Connolly, Yvette Tetteh, and Lars Sellien. This project builds on the valuable work of many of our close friends, and partners. For their help and guidance in developing this report, we extend thanks to: Sunder Katwala (British Future), Bobby Duffy, Rebecca Benson and Kirstie Hewlett (The Policy Institute at Kings College London) and Kirsty McNeill, and Roger Harding. Thanks to Jonathan Heylin-Smith for data visualisation and graphic design.
    [Show full text]
  • X Marks the Box: How to Make Politics Work for You by Daniel Blythe
    Thank you for downloading the free ebook edition of X Marks the Box: How to Make Politics Work for You by Daniel Blythe. This edition is complete and unabridged. Please feel free to pass it on to anyone else you think would be interested. Follow Daniel on his blog at www.xmarksthebox.co.uk. The book is all about debate, of course – so get involved and tell Daniel and the world what you think there! The printed edition of X Marks the Box (ISBN 9781848310513), priced £7.99, is published on Thursday 4 March by Icon Books and will be available in all good bookstores – online and otherwise. And don’t forget to vote! www.xmarksthebox.co.uk I C O N B O O K S Published in the UK in 2010 by Icon Books Ltd, Omnibus Business Centre, 39–41 North Road, London N7 9DP email: [email protected] www.iconbooks.co.uk This electronic edition published in 2010 by Icon Books ISBN: 978-1-84831-180-0 (ePub format) ISBN: 978-1-84831-191-6 (Adobe ebook format) Printed edition (ISBN: 978-1-84831-051-3) sold in the UK, Europe, South Africa and Asia by Faber & Faber Ltd, Bloomsbury House, 74–77 Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DA or their agents Printed edition distributed in the UK, Europe, South Africa and Asia by TBS Ltd, TBS Distribution Centre, Colchester Road, Frating Green, Colchester CO7 7DW Printed edition published in Australia in 2010 by Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd, PO Box 8500, 83 Alexander Street, Crows Nest, NSW 2065 Printed edition distributed in Canada by Penguin Books Canada, 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M4P 2YE Text copyright © 2010 Daniel Blythe The author has asserted his moral rights.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: SLAVE SHIPS, SHAMROCKS, AND SHACKLES: TRANSATLANTIC CONNECTIONS IN BLACK AMERICAN AND NORTHERN IRISH WOMEN’S REVOLUTIONARY AUTO/BIOGRAPHICAL WRITING, 1960S-1990S Amy L. Washburn, Doctor of Philosophy, 2010 Dissertation directed by: Professor Deborah S. Rosenfelt Department of Women’s Studies This dissertation explores revolutionary women’s contributions to the anti-colonial civil rights movements of the United States and Northern Ireland from the late 1960s to the late 1990s. I connect the work of Black American and Northern Irish revolutionary women leaders/writers involved in the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), Black Panther Party (BPP), Black Liberation Army (BLA), the Republic for New Afrika (RNA), the Soledad Brothers’ Defense Committee, the Communist Party- USA (Che Lumumba Club), the Jericho Movement, People’s Democracy (PD), the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association (NICRA), the Irish Republican Socialist Party (IRSP), the National H-Block/ Armagh Committee, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA), Women Against Imperialism (WAI), and/or Sinn Féin (SF), among others by examining their leadership roles, individual voices, and cultural productions. This project analyses political communiqués/ petitions, news coverage, prison files, personal letters, poetry and short prose, and memoirs of revolutionary Black American and Northern Irish women, all of whom were targeted, arrested, and imprisoned for their political activities. I highlight the personal correspondence, auto/biographical narratives, and poetry of the following key leaders/writers: Angela Y. Davis and Bernadette Devlin McAliskey; Assata Shakur and Margaretta D’Arcy; Ericka Huggins and Roseleen Walsh; Afeni Shakur-Davis, Joan Bird, Safiya Bukhari, and Martina Anderson, Ella O’Dwyer, and Mairéad Farrell.
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1
    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Black Vote in 2015
    POWER OF THE BLACK VOTE IN 2015 The Changing Face of England & Wales Parliamentary seats and their voters Sponsored by Table of Contents 3 Foreword - Simon Woolley 4-5 Executive Summary 6-7 List of Marginal Seats Measured by BME Impact 8 Voting and turnout 9 Methodology 10 BME Population 11 Individual BME Communities 12 Labour’s Challenge 13 Conservative’s Opportunity 14 Lib Dem’s Watershed 15 MP’s Vulnerable to BME Vote 16-63 Analysis of Parliamentary Seats © Operation Black Vote - August 2013 Researched, written and designed by Lester Holloway 2Assistance from Louise Alexander Changing Face of Britain Foreword lack and minority ethnic unemployment, education, Bvoters have been handed health and housing. the greatest opportunity ever What is also interesting about to effectively engage in British this data is the shift of where politics. BME political power has been. In Our groundbreaking research the past it was almost exclusively clearly shows that the BME vote in urban, inner city areas which could easily decide over 160 seats. barely changed political hands. The Coalition Government has Today this change is not only oc- governed the UK with a working curring in urban areas such as majority of just 83 seats. The data Croydon, Harrow and Ealing but that we are publishing therefore also outside urban areas, such speaks volumes; In a 168 marginal as Corby, Rossendale & Darwin, seats the BME electorate is larger Cheadle and Loughborough. than the majority in which the With this report we relish the seat was won. The BME electorate challenge to inspire an often cyni- could influence an even greater cal electorate to engage as never number of seats if, as predicted, before, and simultaneously to the election contest becomes ever inform our political leaders that tighter.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Hill, Michael The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Original Citation Hill, Michael (2007) The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/741/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The Leadership Elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Michael Hill A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my father, David Leyland Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 517 25 October 2010 No. 58 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 25 October 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Kenneth Clarke, QC, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITIES—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE—The Rt Hon. Chris Huhne, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Andrew Lansley, CBE, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • “Does Sexual Orientation Still Matter? the Impact of LGBT Candidate
    “Does sexual orientation still matter? The impact of LGBT candidate identity on vote share in the UK elections of 2015.” Andrew Reynolds and Gabriele Magni University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill In this paper we address the following question: In the United Kingdom, a country that has had a long history of homophobia curtailed by a recent and rapid period of transformation, does sexual orientation and gender identity remain a factor at election time? While the transformation of British law in the area of gay rights has been pronounced over the last fifteen years (most notably the equalization of the Age of Consent in 2000, the abolition of Section 28 of the Local Government Act in 2003, the introduction of civil unions in 2004 and of marriage equality in 2013) there remains much homophobia in British society. A 2013 report by Stonewall, Gay in Britain, found that the vast majority of lesbian and gay people in Britain expected their child to be bullied in school, that they faced prejudice in becoming a school governor, that they would be treated worse than straight people by the police and prison service, and that they would face barriers if they wanted to adopt or foster a child. One in five had experienced verbal bullying from colleagues or customers in the previous five years.1 Indeed, pernicious legal discrimination has left a legacy in many social realms and in some regions (most notably Northern Ireland) legal discrimination remains. The question of any lingering impact of sexual orientation on election outcomes is 1 https://www.stonewall.org.uk/resources/gay-britain-2013 important not only to understanding the evolution of gay rights but it speaks to the broader study of the consequences of descriptive representation and, relatedly, how rapid social change happens.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL CALCULUS SLIDESHEETS 2015 All Seats
    ELECTORAL CALCULUS SLIDESHEETS 2015 All Seats - Page One Name___________________ 2010 Pred Maj Name___________________ 2010 Pred Maj Name___________________ 2010 Pred Maj Aberavon LAB LAB 42 Bootle LAB LAB 58 Christchurch CON CON 31 Aberconwy CON CON 5 Boston and Skegness CON CON 20 Cities of London and WestminsterCON CON 24 Aberdeen North LAB SNP 30 Bosworth CON CON 19 Clacton CON UKIP 6 Aberdeen South LAB SNP 29 Bournemouth East CON CON 25 Cleethorpes CON CON 3 Aberdeenshire West and KincardineLIB SNP 18 Bournemouth West CON CON 22 Clwyd South LAB LAB 15 Airdrie and Shotts LAB SNP 7 Bracknell CON CON 29 Clwyd West CON CON 11 Aldershot CON CON 22 Bradford East LIB LAB 14 Coatbridge, Chryston and BellshillLAB LAB 9 Aldridge-Brownhills CON CON 33 Bradford South LAB LAB 20 Colchester LIB LIB 5 Altrincham and Sale West CON CON 21 Bradford West LAB LAB 21 Colne Valley CON CON 4 Alyn and Deeside LAB LAB 14 Braintree CON CON 26 Congleton CON CON 22 Amber Valley CON LAB 5 Brecon and Radnorshire LIB CON 2 Copeland LAB LAB 15 Angus SNP SNP 35 Brent Central LIB LAB 16 Corby CON LAB 3 Arfon Plaid Plaid 3 Brent North LAB LAB 24 Cornwall North LIB CON 3 Argyll and Bute LIB SNP 33 Brentford and Isleworth CON LAB 4 Cornwall South East CON CON 15 Arundel and South Downs CON CON 36 Brentwood and Ongar CON CON 34 Cotswolds, The CON CON 33 Ashfield LAB LAB 17 Bridgend LAB LAB 13 Coventry North East LAB LAB 35 Ashford CON CON 31 Bridgwater and West Somerset CON CON 21 Coventry North West LAB LAB 21 Ashton under Lyne LAB LAB 30 Brigg and Goole CON CON 5 Coventry
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 575 10 February 2014 No. 120 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 10 February 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 539 10 FEBRUARY 2014 540 sure that the teaching unions will recognise that this is House of Commons in their interests, and I hope they will embrace and support these changes. Monday 10 February 2014 Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): I know the Secretary of State sees himself as a big beast The House met at half-past Two o’clock at the Cabinet table championing educational reform, but is he aware that most of us who wish well for our educational system want the big beast to be controlled PRAYERS by good information, good research and good evidence? What is the evidence for the longer school day? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Michael Gove: The evidence is there in the gap between, for example, the performance of independent fee-paying schools and state schools. If one looks at those children who get the best results at the end of primary school Oral Answers to Questions and what happens to those who go on to independent schools and those who stay in the state sector, one sees that at the moment those who go on to independent schools are more likely to get good GCSEs and A-levels. EDUCATION A longer school day is one of the ingredients that we believe will make a difference.
    [Show full text]