DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Formal Characteristics of Parallel Speech in Kambera Leif Asplund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Formal Characteristics of Parallel Speech in Kambera Leif Asplund Some formal characteristics of parallel speech in Kambera Leif Asplund Department of Linguistics Independent Project for the Degree of Master (one year) Degree 15 HE credits General Linguistics Spring term 2017 Supervisor: Bernhard Wälchli Examiner: Bernhard Wälchli Exper reviewer: Francesca Di Garbo Some formal characteristics of parallel speech in Kambera Leif Asplund Sammanfattning I alla språk på den östindonesiska ön Sumba används parallellt tal i rituella sammanhang. I denna studie undersöks några egenskaper av parallellt tal i Kambera. I analysen av kupletters (enheter för parallellt tal) strukturtyper används alla kupletter som finns i Kapita (1987) och en del annat material, även från andra sumbanesiska språk. I resten av undersökningen används endast ett urval av 100 kupletter, här löst definierade som parallella talenheter, i Kapita (1987) av den vanligaste typen, och undersökningen är begränsad till formella (icke-semantiska) drag som förbinder de två raderna. De drag som undersökts är antalet stavelser, ord och betoningar och syntaktisk struktur. I diskussionsdelen diskuteras bl a om existensen av icke-parallella rader som inkorporerar parallella par bör erkännas. Slutsatserna summerar resultaten om de olika typerna av kupletter och den formella kopplingen mellan de två raderna i dem. Nyckelord Kambera, ordpar, parallelism, rituellt språk, Sumba Abstract In all languages of the eastern Indonesian island of Sumba, parallel speech is used in ritual contexts. In this study, some characteristics of parallel speech in Kambera are investigated. In the analysis of the structural types of couplets, the units of parallel speech, all the couplets found in Kapita (1987), and some additional materials, even from other Sumbanese languages, are used. In the rest of the investigation, only a sample of 100 couplets, here loosely defined as parallel speech units, in Kapita (1987) of the most common type is used, and the investigation is limited to formal (non-semantic) features which connect the two lines. The features investigated are number of syllables, words, and stresses and syntactic structure. In the discussion part, the question if the existence of non-parallel lines incorporating parallel pairs should be recognized and other questions are discussed. The conclusion summarizes the results about the different varieties of couplets and the formal connection between the two lines in them. Keywords Kambera, parallelism, ritual speech, Sumba, word pairs Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 2 Background ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 Kambera and the languages of Sumba .................................................................................... 2 2.2 Parallel speech ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Definitions and terminology ............................................................................................ 3 2.2.2 Stress patterns in Kambera .............................................................................................. 5 2.2.3 Parallelism in Indonesia and worldwide .......................................................................... 5 2.2.4 Earlier research on parallel speech on Sumba ................................................................. 5 2.2.5 Context and function of parallel speech on Sumba ......................................................... 6 2.2.6 Characteristics of Sumbanese parallel speech ................................................................. 6 3 Aims and research questions .......................................................... 8 4. Method and data ............................................................................. 9 4.1 Method and procedure of investigation ................................................................................... 9 4.2 Materials .................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Materials used .................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.2 Transcription, morphological analysis, glossing and translation ................................... 10 4.2.3 Sample limitations ......................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Ethical issues ......................................................................................................................... 10 5 Results and analysis ..................................................................... 11 5.1 The structure of parallel speech ............................................................................................. 11 5.1.1 The combination of parallel lines .................................................................................. 11 5.1.2 Order between parallel lines .......................................................................................... 20 5.2 Non-semantic relations between parallel lines ...................................................................... 21 5.2.1. Non-semantic differences between parallel lines .......................................................... 21 5.2.2 Number of syllables in parallel lines ............................................................................. 22 5.2.3 Factors relevant and irrelevant for equality of quantity between parallel lines ............ 23 5.2.4 Functional morphemes found in only one of the parallel lines ..................................... 25 5.2.5 Repeated words and words in parallel pairs .................................................................. 25 6 Discussion ..................................................................................... 27 6.1 Discussion of method ............................................................................................................ 27 6.2 General discussion ................................................................................................................. 27 6.4 Some characteristics of parallel speech which have not been researched in this study ........ 28 7 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 29 7.1 Answers to the research questions ......................................................................................... 29 7.2 Suggestions for further research ............................................................................................ 29 References ............................................................................................ 31 Appendices ............................................................................................ 33 Appendix A: Grammatical morphemes in Kambera. ........................................................................ 34 Appendix B: The sample of couplets ................................................................................................ 35 Appendix C: Number of syllables and stresses ................................................................................. 48 C.I. Number of syllables ................................................................................................................ 48 C.II. Number of primary and secondary stresses, counted according to the description in Klamer (1998). ........................................................................................................................................... 49 Appendix D: The functional morphemes and repeated terms found in the couplets in Appendix B 50 D.I. Non-content/functional morphemes ....................................................................................... 50 D.II. Content words, repeated terms .............................................................................................. 50 Abbreviations 1 first person 2 second person 3 third person ACC accusative ART article (Kambera, SG: na, PL da) CLF classifier CTR marker of controlled complement clause (Kambera pa=) DAT dative DEM demonstrative EXCL exclusive GEN genitive HORT hortative INCL inclusive IRR irrealis k_o kind of LOC locative preposition (Kambera la, lai) NA proper name NEG negation (Kambera nda) NG The suffix -ng (functions in Kambera: applicative, aspectual (continuous, imperfective, distributive or non-delimited), verb incorporation marker, stylistic filler (Klamer 1998: 234)) NOM nominative PA the prefix pa- (functions in Kambera: causative/factitive and intensive/volational (Klamer 1998: 197) (to be distinguished from CTR and REL.OBJ) PL plural PFV perfective aspect marker (Kambera =ka) PRM permissive SG singular REL.OBJ object relative clause marker (Kambera pa=) REL.SBJ subject relative clause marker (Kambera ma=) Ø no morpheme _ connector between words in glossing when one gloss consists of more than one word . affix boundary, but the two connected morphemes are glossed as one unit - affix boundary = clitic boundary (only clitics which are both prosodic and syntactic are marked with =) ͡ connects two words which are glossed together > stands before an explanation of a couplet 1 Introduction The present study is about the formal characteristics of the couplets of the parallel speech which is used in ritual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Su~Manese FINGER NAMES: SOME COMPARATIVE REMARKS
    su~mANESE FINGER NAMES: SOME COMPARATIVE REMARKS In an article published in JASO concerned mostly with Kedang number use, Barnes (1980, in pp.201-204) described the names applied to the fingers in this eastern Indonesian society in rela­ tion to data drawn from other parts of Indonesia and elsewhere. The purpose of the following remarks is to present further com­ parative evidence from another area of Indonesia--the island of Sumba, and more especially eastern Sumba--in order to extend the discussion of a couple of issues raised by Barnes, and to consider certain questions that arise from the Sumbanese data themselves. My initial focus and point of will be the names given to the fingers in Rindi, the eastern Sumbanese domain where I carried out fieldwork for two years. Most of the linguistic evidence from areas other than Rindi that I present below is taken from a comparative word list of the Sumbanese languages compiled by the Dutch missionary linguist and ethnographer D. (1917). It is useful to note that with regard to language, Sumba has been divided into two regions, an eastern language and a western language region, which I shall hereafter abbreviate as ELR and WLR. There are however several districts which are (and to some extent culturally) western but which nevertheless have languages that be~ long to the eastern group (see Onvlee ~973:165). These include Mamboru, Anakalangu and Wanukaka. The names for the which I recorded in Rindi are listed in Table 1. Following (1917:15-16), the same terminology is employed in Kambera, dialect of eastern Sumbanese, and indeed in most dialects of the eastern language region, with the 231 232 Gregory Forth Tabre 1: Names for Fingers in Rindi rima hand, arm, finger wua rima finger bai rima or (wua) rima bai thumb (wua) rima patuji index (wua) rima padua mi4dle finger (wua) rima pandadiha fourth (ring) (wua) rima kakiha little finger minor exception that, according to this authority, the middle is called in Kambera wua rima ndau padua (ndau[ngu], 'to stand, be placed').
    [Show full text]
  • PART I: NAME SEQUENCE Name Sequence
    Name Sequence PART I: NAME SEQUENCE A-ch‘ang Abor USE Achang Assigned collective code [sit] Aba (Sino-Tibetan (Other)) USE Chiriguano UF Adi Abaknon Miri Assigned collective code [phi] Miśing (Philippine (Other)) Aborlan Tagbanwa UF Capul USE Tagbanua Inabaknon Abua Kapul Assigned collective code [nic] Sama Abaknon (Niger-Kordofanian (Other)) Abau Abujhmaria Assigned collective code [paa] Assigned collective code [dra] (Papuan (Other)) (Dravidian (Other)) UF Green River Abulas Abaw Assigned collective code [paa] USE Abo (Cameroon) (Papuan (Other)) Abazin UF Ambulas Assigned collective code [cau] Maprik (Caucasian (Other)) Acadian (Louisiana) Abenaki USE Cajun French Assigned collective code [alg] Acateco (Algonquian (Other)) USE Akatek UF Abnaki Achangua Abia Assigned collective code [sai] USE Aneme Wake (South American (Other)) Abidji Achang Assigned collective code [nic] Assigned collective code [sit] (Niger-Kordofanian (Other)) (Sino-Tibetan (Other)) UF Adidji UF A-ch‘ang Ari (Côte d'Ivoire) Atsang Abigar Ache USE Nuer USE Guayaki Abkhaz [abk] Achi Abnaki Assigned collective code [myn] USE Abenaki (Mayan languages) Abo (Cameroon) UF Cubulco Achi Assigned collective code [bnt] Rabinal Achi (Bantu (Other)) Achinese [ace] UF Abaw UF Atjeh Bo Cameroon Acholi Bon (Cameroon) USE Acoli Abo (Sudan) Achuale USE Toposa USE Achuar MARC Code List for Languages October 2007 page 11 Name Sequence Achuar Afar [aar] Assigned collective code [sai] UF Adaiel (South American Indian Danakil (Other)) Afenmai UF Achuale USE Etsako Achuara Jivaro Afghan
    [Show full text]
  • LOVESTRAND, Joseph. 2021. 'Languages of Sumba: State of The
    Languages of Sumba: State of the field Joseph LOVESTRAND SOAS University of London This paper reviews the state of documentation and description of the languages of Sumba, an island located in the province of Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) in Indonesia. Sumba is home to a population of over 800,000 people. The languages of Sumba can be divided into eight or more distinct languages. Language documentation and description in Sumba began in the 19th century with the arrival of the Dutch. The most well-described language of Sumba is Kambera, spoken by 150,000 or more people occupying the eastern half of the island (Klamer 1998a). There is much less documentation and grammatical description of the languages of West Sumba. with the exception of two recent MA theses. There are also many word lists, as well as orthographically transcribed ritual texts included in publications by anthropologists interested in this aspect of the culture. Video documentation of the languages of Sumba is almost completely lacking. Language vitality in Sumba remains relatively high, however, there are signs of a possible shift to Indonesian. This increases the urgency of the need for language documentation and description, as well as investment in programs that facilitate ongoing local language use. 1. Background This paper provides a concise summary of the current state of published, academic knowledge of the languages of Sumba.1 Figure 1 shows the location of the island of Sumba in the province of Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), Indonesia. Sumba is south of Flores, and accessed by flight via Bali (from the west) or Timor (from the east).
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of Indonesia (Nusa Tenggara)
    Ethnologue report for Indonesia (Nusa Tenggara) Page 1 of 16 Languages of Indonesia (Nusa Tenggara) See language map. Indonesia (Nusa Tenggara). 7,961,540 (2000 census). Population includes 3,370,000 in West Nusa Tenggara (1993), 3,269,000 in East Nusa Tenggara (1993). Information mainly from C. Grimes, T. Therik, B. D. Grimes, and M. Jacob 1997. The number of languages listed for Indonesia (Nusa Tenggara) is 73. Of those, all are living languages. Living languages Abui [abz] 16,000. Ethnic population: 16,000 (1981 Wurm and Hattori). Central and western Alor in the Lesser Sundas. Alternate names: Barue, "Barawahing", Namatalaki. Dialects: Atimelang, Kobola, Alakaman. Much dialect diversity. The Alakaman dialect may be a dialect of Kamang (Woisika). May be more than one language. Classification: Trans-New Guinea, South Bird's Head-Timor-Alor-Pantar, Timor-Alor-Pantar, Makasai-Alor-Pantar, Alor More information. Adang [adn] 31,814 (2000 WCD). Northwestern (Bird's Head) Alor Island in the Lesser Sundas. Alternate names: Alor. Dialects: Aimoli. On the basis of linguistic differences and social identity, it is considered a separate language from Kabola. Classification: Trans-New Guinea, South Bird's Head-Timor-Alor-Pantar, Timor-Alor-Pantar, Makasai-Alor-Pantar, Alor More information. Adonara [adr] 16,967 (2000 WCD). Adonara Island, and eastern Solor Island, between Flores and Lembata. Alternate names: Nusa Tadon, Waiwerang, Vaiverang, Sagu. Dialects: West Adonara, East Adonara, East Solor. Classification: Austronesian, Malayo- Polynesian, Central-Eastern, Central Malayo- Polynesian, Timor, Flores-Lembata More information. Alor [aol] 25,000 (1997 Grimes, Therik, Grimes, Jacob). West and south of Bird's Head of Alor, north Ternate Island, pockets along northern Pantar and adjacent islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification and Change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea
    Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea by David Christopher Kamholz A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Andrew Garrett, Chair Professor Larry Hyman Professor Johanna Nichols Fall 2014 Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea Copyright 2014 by David Christopher Kamholz 1 Abstract Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea by David Christopher Kamholz Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Andrew Garrett, Chair This dissertation presents a new subgrouping of South Halmahera–West New Guinea (SHWNG) languages. The 38 SHWNG languages form a small, poorly known branch of Austronesian. The Austronesian family originated in Taiwan and later spread into In- donesia, across New Guinea, and to the remote Pacific. In New Guinea, approximately 3500 years ago, Austronesian speakers first came into contact with so-called Papuan languages—the non-Austronesian languages indigenous to New Guinea, comprising more than 20 families. The Austronesian languages still extant from this initial spread into New Guinea fall into two branches: SHWNG and Oceanic. In great contrast to Oceanic, only a few SHWNG languages are well-described, and almost nothing has been reconstructed at the level of Proto-SHWNG. Contact with Papuan languages has given the SHWNG lan- guages a typological profile quite different from their linguistic forebears. Chapter 1 puts the SHWNG languages in context, describing their significance for Aus- tronesian and their broader relevance to historical linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembong-Wangka
    Rembong-Wangka Its position among the Manggaraic languages, some formative elements and adnominal possession Leif Asplund Department of Linguistics Independent Project for the Degree of Master (2 years) 30 ECTS Typology and Linguistic Diversity Spring term 2020 Supervisor: Ljuba Veselinova Faculty reviewer: Bernhard Wälchli Examiner: Ljuba Veselinova Rembong-Wangka Its position among the Manggaraic languages, some formative elements and adnominal possession Leif Asplund Abstract Rembong-Wangka is an Austronesian language, which together with other little described languages, belongs to the Manggaraic subgroup of Austronesian. One aim is to present information about them, as well as other languages in the area, drawn from not readily accessible sources, including archival material, and information collected by the author in Flores. An estimation of the number of speakers of Rembong-Wangka, the dialects and a map of settlements where the language is spoken, are given. The second aim is to describe adnominal possessive constructions, and the third to discuss etymologies of morphological elements in these constructions. The material to answer these questions was collected during two short field trips. Written glossed texts in a Rembong-Wangka corpus constructed by the author were used and analysed in the FLEx program. In pronominal possession, the possessor can be expressed by pronominal enclitics or oblique pronouns. The latter of these two strategies is more emphatic. Non-pronominal possession can be expressed by juxtaposition or with a Possession Construction Marker (PCM). Juxtaposition is used mostly for non- prototypical possession or possession-like relationships and PCMs mainly for prototypical possession. The etymology of the oblique pronouns is discussed, as well as the possible etymological connections of Central Flores PCMs with different words in Rembong-Wangka.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY STUDY of the DIALECTS of Kamberavol
    KULTURISTIK: Jurnal Bahasa dan Budaya Vol. 5, No. 2, Juli 2021, 1-6 PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE DIALECTS OF KAMBERA Doi: 10.22225/kulturistik.5.2.3654 PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE DIALECTS OF KAMBERA Raynesta Mikaela Indri Malo Universitas Kristen Wira Wacana Sumba [email protected] ABSTRACT Kambera language is a regional language used by speakers who live in the eastern part of the island of Sumba, in this case East Sumba Regency. In previous studies, the claim stated by the researchers is that there is only 1 language spoken in East Sumba. However, the people of East Sumba, as native speakers, claim that there are several languages used depending on the villages. This study aims to map these languages/dialects. This descriptive preliminary study is limited to make an inventory of basic vocabulary between 11 different locations determined based on the number of paraingu namely kabihu unions or ethnic clans in the past. The basic vocabularies are taken from Sawdesh 200-list and Leipzig-Jakarta 100-list. The combination of these lists results in 223 basic vocabularies which become the main data for this study. The data were collected through recording and note-taking. Keywords: dialect; Kambera; Sumba INTRODUCTION only differentiated geographically but also Kambera is a native language spoken by culturally. People are not only classified roughly 150,000 speakers in the eastern part of because they live in different geographic areas Sumba Island of the province Nusa Tenggara but also because they are culturally different. It Timur in eastern Indonesia. Blust classified it as means that they hold certain kinds of cultures, belonging to the Central-Malayo-Polynesian customs, and languages that are different from subgroup.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification and Change in South-Halmahera-West New Guinea
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and Change in South-Halmahera-West New Guinea Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nj8g0b3 Author Kamholz, David Publication Date 2014 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea by David Christopher Kamholz A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Andrew Garrett, Chair Professor Larry Hyman Professor Johanna Nichols Fall 2014 Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea Copyright 2014 by David Christopher Kamholz 1 Abstract Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea by David Christopher Kamholz Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Andrew Garrett, Chair This dissertation presents a new subgrouping of South Halmahera–West New Guinea (SHWNG) languages. The 38 SHWNG languages form a small, poorly known branch of Austronesian. The Austronesian family originated in Taiwan and later spread into In- donesia, across New Guinea, and to the remote Pacific. In New Guinea, approximately 3500 years ago, Austronesian speakers first came into contact with so-called Papuan languages—the non-Austronesian languages indigenous to New Guinea, comprising more than 20 families. The Austronesian languages still extant from this initial spread into New Guinea fall into two branches: SHWNG and Oceanic. In great contrast to Oceanic, only a few SHWNG languages are well-described, and almost nothing has been reconstructed at the level of Proto-SHWNG.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781626160378 GURT 2014.Pdf (5.0MB)
    MEASURED LANGUAGE The Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics Series Selected Titles Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media DEBORAH TANNEN AND ANNA MARIE TRESTER, EDITORS Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities: Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment HEIDI BYRNES, HEATHER D. WEGER-GUNTHARP, AND KATHERINE A. SPRANG, EDITORS Implicit and Explicit Language Learning: Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism CRISTINA SANZ AND RONALD P. LEOW, EDITORS Language in Use: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives on Language and Language Learning ANDREA E. TYLER, MARI TAKADA, YIYOUNG KIM, AND DIANA MARINOVA, EDITORS Linguistics, Language, and the Professions: Education, Journalism, Law, Medicine, and Technology JAMES E. ALATIS, HEIDI E. HAMILTON, AND AI-HUI TAN, EDITORS Telling Stories: Language, Narrative, and Social Life DEBORAH SCHIFFRIN, ANNA DE FINA, AND ANASTASIA NYLUND, EDITORS MEASURED LANGUAGE Quantitative Approaches to Acquisition, Assessment, and Variation Jeffrey Connor-Linton and Luke Wander Amoroso, Editors GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS Washington, DC Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. www.press.georgetown.edu © 2014 by Georgetown University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Measured language : quantitative studies of acquisition, assessment, and variation / Jeffrey Connor-Linton and Luke Wander Amoroso, Editors. pages cm. — (Georgetown University Round Table On Languages And Linguistics Series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-62616-037-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Linguistics—Methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • 0=AFRICAN Geosector
    3= AUSTRONESIAN phylosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 225 3=AUSTRONESIAN phylosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This phylosector covers 72 sets of languages (1,179 outer languages, comprising 3,182 inner languages) spoken by predominantly island-dwelling communities, located from the western Indian Ocean to the eastern Pacific and constituting the Austronesian intercontinental affinity. They extend more than half-way around the planet (eastwards from 43º E to 109º W; see note under phylozone 39=), and have also been associated with the languages of phylozone 47=Daic, within the "Austro-Tai" hypothesis. Zone 30= covers languages spoken on the island of Taiwan (Formosa), and zone 31= covers languages spoken by communities situated on most of the islands from the Philippines and the Celebes through Java, Southeast Asia (including Hainan island in China), Borneo and Sumatra to Madagascar: 30=TAIWANIC 31=HESPERONESIC Zones 32= to 39= cover languages spoken on most of the islands from the Nusa Tenggera archipelago through New Guinea and across the Pacific, as far as New Zealand / Aotearoa, French Polynesia and Hawaii: 32=MESONESIC 33=HALMAYAPENIC 34=NEOGUINEIC 35=MANUSIC 36=SOLOMONIC 37=KANAKIC 38=WESTPACIFIC 39=TRANSPACIFIC Before consulting the following tables, please see Guide to the Register in Volume One Les données supplémentaires
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Numerals in Malayo- Polynesian Languages Outside of Oceania
    Innovative numerals in Malayo- Polynesian languages outside of Oceania Antoinette Schappera & Harald Hammarströmb Leiden Universitya, Universität zu Kölna, Radboud Universityb & Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropologyb In this paper we seek to draw attention to Malayo- Polynesian languages outside of the Oceanic subgroup with innovative bases and complex numerals involving various additive, subtractive and multiplicative procedures. We highlight that the number of languages showing such innovations is more than previously recognised in the literature. Finally, we observe that the concentration of complex numeral innovations in the region of eastern Indonesia suggests Papuan influence, either through contact or substrate. However, we also note that socio-cultural factors, in the form of numeral taboos and conventionalised counting practices, may have played a role in driving innovations in numerals. 1. INTRODUCTION1 There has been much discussion of the developments in innovative numeral formations in Oceanic languages. Galis (1960) observed that many AN languages to the north of New Guinea have exchanged the ancestral decimal system for various quinary systems. More recently, Dunn et al. (2008:739) observed that the decimal system in their sample of 22 western Oceanic languages was not very stable, having changed in almost half the languages to quinary systems. Blust (2009:274) suggests that the emergence of such different numeral systems in Oceanic languages is due to intensive contact and trading between Austronesian and Papuan language-speaking peoples. Smith (1988:51-53) similarly observed that counting systems were not particularly stable due to trading and exchange relations between AN and Papuan language speaking peoples in Morobe province of Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section I
    I(f) inhibitors I-225 (Colo.) Germany, 1947-1948 USE If inhibitors USE Interstate 225 (Colo.) Subsequent proceedings, Nuremberg War I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor (Ill.) I-244 (Tulsa, Okla.) Crime Trials, case no. 6 USE Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage USE Interstate 244 (Tulsa, Okla.) BT Nuremberg War Crime Trials, Nuremberg, Corridor (Ill.) I-255 (Ill. and Mo.) Germany, 1946-1949 I & M Canal State Trail (Ill.) USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-H-3 (Hawaii) USE Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Ill.) I-270 (Ill. and Mo. : Proposed) USE Interstate H-3 (Hawaii) I-5 USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-hadja (African people) USE Interstate 5 I-270 (Md.) USE Kasanga (African people) I-8 (Ariz. and Calif.) USE Interstate 270 (Md.) I Ho Yüan (Beijing, China) USE Interstate 8 (Ariz. and Calif.) I-278 (N.J. and N.Y.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-10 USE Interstate 278 (N.J. and N.Y.) I Ho Yüan (Peking, China) USE Interstate 10 I-291 (Conn.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-15 USE Interstate 291 (Conn.) I-hsing ware USE Interstate 15 I-394 (Minn.) USE Yixing ware I-15 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 394 (Minn.) I-K'a-wan Hsi (Taiwan) USE Polikarpov I-15 (Fighter plane) I-395 (Baltimore, Md.) USE Qijiawan River (Taiwan) I-16 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 395 (Baltimore, Md.) I-Kiribati (May Subd Geog) USE Polikarpov I-16 (Fighter plane) I-405 (Wash.) UF Gilbertese I-17 USE Interstate 405 (Wash.) BT Ethnology—Kiribati USE Interstate 17 I-470 (Ohio and W.
    [Show full text]