DOCSLIB.ORG

DIVISION of MINES and GEOLOGY for the Period Commencing October 1, 1948 and Ending September 30, 1950

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DIVISION of MINES and GEOLOGY for the Period Commencing October 1, 1948 and Ending September 30, 1950 STATE OF WASHINGTON ARTHUR B. LANGLIE, ~overnor Department of Conservation and Development JACK V. ROGERS, Director BIENNIAL REPORT NO. 3 of the DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY For the Period Commencing October 1, 1948 and Ending September 30, 1950 by SHELDON L. GLOVER Supervisor OLYMPIA, WASH. STATE PRINTING PLANT 1951 DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY BmNNIAL REPORT NO. i SHELDON L. GLOVER, Supervisor GENERAL STATEMENT The following report applies to the organization and activities of the Di­ vision of Mines and Geology :for the period October 1, 1948 to September 30, 1950. The technical staff consisted of: Sheldon L. Glover, Supervisor, B. S. and M. S. in Geology, University of Washington, Registered Mining Engineer W. A.G. Bennett, B. S. and M. S. in Geology, State College of Washington, Ph. D., University of Chicago Grant M. Valentine, B. S. and M. S. in Geology, State College of Washing­ ton Marshall T. Huntting, B. S. and M. S. in Geology, State College of Wash­ ington, Registered Mining Engineer C. Phillips Purdy, Jr., S. B. in Geology, Harvard College, postgraduate in mining geology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Stephen H. Green, Mining Engineer, who was on leave of absence without pay during the early part of the biennium and then retired, and whose vacant position on the staff has not been filled Robert H. Stebbins, B. S. in Geology, Massachusetts Institute of Tech­ nology, who filled the position left vacant when Grant Valentine re­ signed toward the end of the biennium to enter the employ of the Shell Oil Company The clerical staff consisted of Dorothy Rinkenberger, B. A., State College of Washington, and an assistant-first Ruth Johnston; then Darlene Tilley; and, near the end of the biennium, Sandra Burdick. Temporary additions to the staff for special projects were George B. Rigg, Professor Emeritus, Botany Department, University of Washington, in charge of a peat investigation, and C. S. Leuthy, F. A, Nave, and E. M. Woodruff, field assistants. Activities, as usual, were confined almost exclusively to economic as­ pects of the state's mineral resources. During the biennium much information was gained through continued geologic investigations in the neld to supple­ ment the results of similar work conducted by the Division and its predecessor agencies since 1901. All this fund of data is readily available and is constantly used in answering inquiries regarding the mineral occurrences of the state­ questions involving: the kinds and varieties of metallic and industrial minerals, their locations, extent, and accessibility; uses to which the materials are adapted; markets; and sources of supplies for industry, both here and out-of­ state. [ 3 ) 4 Division of Mines and Geology STATUS OF MINERAL PRODUCTION IN WASHINGTON Mining during the biennium has been particularly active and has con­ tributed markedly to the wealth of the state. Just how important the industry is may best be realized by considering the mineral statistics for the past decade. The total production of all minerals and aggregates .from 1939 to 1948, in­ clusive, was approximately $353 million-far more than for any previous 10 years in the state's history. In fact, each year of that decade exceeded in value of production any year previous to that period since mining began in Wash­ ington. The average annual output during the 10 years was $351h million. Of this, the metallic minerals--chiefly gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc-had an average annual value of about $7% million, or 23 percent of the total; while the industrial minerals--portland cement, coal, sand and gravel, stone, mag­ nesite, clay products, and other materials of lesser importance-had an average annual value of about $271h million, or 78 percent of the total. This relation­ ship between value of output of the metallic and the industrial minerals is not generally realized by those unconversant with the details of our mineral in­ dustry. 18 ao I " I "''40 -- rt < j ::Al /'\ I 0 'l) Cl 30 " I ... ~ 0 21 . I -"\ ( \J A I I\ / - V - -, <I''""' bl~V- ~ -<• .-~ 1\/ L.,,-----"' II 1'10 !920 .1'.t!I Ul3D ..UMO Value of Washington's mineral production, 1900-1948 Again considering production during the past decade, the average annual value for that period was exceeded not only during the war years of 1942-44, as would have been expected, but also during 1947 and 1948, when curtailed production certainly would have been expected. Actually, the 1947 production exceeded that of any previous year in the state's history, and the 1948 pro­ duction exceeded that of 1947 by $10lh million, reaching the phenomenal all­ time high of $501h million. Selected Mineral Production©-1941 through 1948 1942 1943 19" PRODUCT I 1941 Quantity Value Quantity Value Quantity Value . - . ............ · 1 $1,235,787 $1,021,735 $1,027,236 $1,197,149 Coal . ......... .. ....... ............ short tons I 1,841,274 6,478,074 1,953,209 7,549,362 l ,527 ,544 6,729,906 ·· ··1,524,lil·"' ········ 7,358,966 Coke . ........ .......................short tons 14,853 © Copper .......•• . ..........•.... ....... pounds 17,372,000 ·· · ·2:o-iii:soo · ·· · io:000:000 · ·· ·· i;iJ4s:200· 14,630,000 1,901,900 12,338,000 ·· ··1,665,680·········· Gold ..................... ........... troy ounces 84,176 2,946,160 75,396 2,638,860 65,24,4 2,283,540 47,277 1,654,695 Iron oro ......... .................. ... long tons '7,271 @ ll,851 @ 18,455 @ 8,695 © Lead ........ ............ .... ..... short tons 3,900 444, !M2 4 ,&"1 650,034 5,022 5,825 932,000 Lime . .......... ........ ..•• ......... short tons 62,309 656,362 55,864 623,766 @ ,,300 55,241 667,546 Mangunese ore ....... .............. short tons @ 10,660 @ 7,731 5,199 Peat ............................ ..... short tons ~ @ @ ® @ © Pumice ............................... short tons 700 7,862 788 ~8,705 t, Sand and gravel. ... .....•......... short tons ·5;583;285. 2,476,834 8,172,550 4,094,900 5,1.83,374 3,408,720 6.~.153 4,076,976 .... Silver ................ .... .......... troy ounces 402,030 285,888 369,038 262,427 370,440 268,424 321,608 228,699 ~.... Stono ................. ....... ....... short tons 2,148,970 1,757,873 1,965,820 1,809,757 2,081,810 2,499,550 2,538,690 2,756,332 Cl) Talc nod soapstone... .............. short tons 0 2,420 7 2,864 1,998 ll,822 3,288 34,103 .... 'J'nngsten ore (60% COIJC.) ........... short tons I @ @ ~3 56,289 4 6,712 5 © g Zinc ......................... ....... sbort tons 14,320 2,148,000 14,398 2,678,028 12,203 2,685,848 ll,904 2,nt,112 Mlscellnncous© ............................................... 8,024,090 12,328,271 16,068,680 13,187,787 .Q. 1 'l'otal. ......... ......................... • ...............L $28,506,SS2 l...... :··~~3 .............. 1 $37,593,000 , .............. , $36,483,000 ~ 1945 1940 1947 JJ).18 .... PRODUO'l' I I I ;:! ----------------! Qunntlty I Value Quantity J Voluc , Quantity J Value Qunntlty I Value ~ Cl) Cloy aod clay products ................................, . 31,541,714 . $2,448,594 ............. $2,112,000 $1,967,000 Coal . .................. ............ short toos 1,357,244 6,947,404 000,000 5,4()5,000 1 J,117,926 6,691,202 1,210,000 7,732,000 § Coke .. ...............................short tons . .. .. ........... ....... ................... .. ............ .............. .............. ............. p,. Copper .... ... ......................... pounds n,6-12,000 1,5TI,670 9,054,000 1,466,748 4,480,000 940,800 ll,830,000 2,458,610 Gold . .......•...................... troy ounces 57,860 2,0'.lii, 100 51,168 1,790,880 34,965 1,223,775 70,075 2,452,625 Iron ore ........ .... .... ............ long tons . .. .......... ................ Q 2,268 @ 5,364 @ ~ Lead .......................... ..... short tons 3,802 653,944 2,987 651,166 5,359 1,543,392 0 Lime ........ ......................... short tons @ © @ ; 7.147 2.r.020 Manganese ore ...................... short tons 6,99-l @ 1,424 a -0 Peat ..... .......... ..••............ short tons 824 903 @ a ~2,425 ~10,125 Pumice ........ ....... •.. ... ......... short tons 4,414 86,045 U,586 66,008 26,497 74,173 126,675 47,787 ~ Sand and gravel ..................... short tons 6,949,809 3,872,633 7,557,707 4,608,392 s,380,on 5,7001960 9,267,225 0,657,129 Silver .............................. troy ounces 2SJ,444 200,138 :IM,453 213,678 293,736 26o,881 375,881 340,146 Stone ................................ short tons 8,741,200 3,778,000 3,149,000 S,232,806 3,865,110 4,550,275 5,229,500 6,SS2,4~ 'l'alc and soapstone............ ..... abort tons 2,804 33,458 5,084 38,051 © @ © @ 'l'ungsten ore (60% cone.) .. ......... short tons 2 @ 1 @ .............. .............. .............. ........ ..... Zinc ............................. .... short tons U,693 2,689,39<! ll,829 2,764,276 18,800 3,339,000 12,638 3,861,708 Miscellaneous© ............................ , · ·... 7,955,505 . 10,345,402 . 18,4n,867 . • 16,539,907 1 1 1 1 1 Total.................................... $31,301,000 ·············· $33,076,000 •••••••••••••• $39,924,000 $50,498,000 (D Compiled by State Division of Mines and Geology from statistics of 0. S. Bureau of Mines, 11s published In llilnerals Yearbook, 1941 and Jator years!.Not included lo state total, In orde-r to avoid dupllcotlon. • Included In "miscellaneous." • Includes minerals Indicated by @ a·t,ove, also, In various years, the following: arsenlous oxide, dlatomlte, magnesite, magnesium, magne5Jum sulphate, mercury, portland cement, pulpstones, silica (Quartz), and other minerals. c:.,, 6 Division of Mines and Geology Total Mineral Production 1939-1948 Year Meta.Uic minerals Industrial m inerals Total 1939 .. ... ... ....... $ 6,739,467 $ 24,850,556 $ 31,590,023 1940 . ....... ... ...... 7,018,812 21,071,376 28,090,188 1941 ..... ............ 7,874,886 20,631,996 28,506,882 1942 ...... •.....•..... 8,172,609 27,486,934 35,659,543 1943 ..... .... .... , . 7,838.012 29,754,988 37,593,000 1944 .....•. .. ... • .... • .. 7,195,136 29,287,864 36,483,000 1945 ....
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Principles of Geochemical Prospecting
    Principles of Geochemical Prospecting GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1000-F CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOCHEMICAL PROSPECTING FOR MINERALS PRINCIPLES OF GEOCHEMICAL PROSPECTING By H. E. HAWKES ABSTRACT Geochemical prospecting for minerals includes any method of mineral exploration based on systematic measurement of the chemical properties of a naturally occurring material. The purpose of the measurements is the location of geochemical anomalies or of areas where the chemical pattern indicates the presence of ore in the vicinity. Anomalies may be formed either at depth by igneous and metamorphic processes or at the earth's surface by agents of weathering, erosion, and surficial transportation. Geochemical anomalies of deep-seated origin primary anomalies may result from (1) apparent local variation in the original composition of the earth's crust, defining a distinctive "geochemical province" especially favor­ able for the occurrence of ore, (2) impregnation of rocks by mineralizing fluids related to ore formation, and (3) dispersion of volatile elements transported in gaseous form. Anomalies of surficial origin-^secondary anomalies take the form either of residual materials from weathering of rocks and ores in place or of material dispersed from the ore deposit by gravity, moving water, or glacial ice. The mobility of an element, or tendency for it to migrate in the.surficial environment, determines the characteristics of the geochemical anomalies it can form. Water is the principal transporting agency for the products of weathering. Mobility is, therefore, closely related to the tendency of an element to be stable in water-soluble form. The chemical factors affecting the mobility of elements include hydrogen-ion concentration, solubility of salts, coprecipitation, sorption, oxidation potential, and the formation of complexes and colloidal solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Deposits in Sedimentary and Volcanogenic Rocks
    Copper Deposits in Sedimentary and Volcanogenic Rocks GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 907-C COVER PHOTOGRAPHS 1 . Asbestos ore 8. Aluminum ore, bauxite, Georgia 1 2 3 4 2. Lead ore. Balmat mine, N . Y. 9. Native copper ore, Keweenawan 5 6 3. Chromite-chromium ore, Washington Peninsula, Mich. 4. Zinc ore, Friedensville, Pa. 10. Porphyry molybdenum ore, Colorado 7 8 5. Banded iron-formation, Palmer, 11. Zinc ore, Edwards, N.Y. Mich. 12. Manganese nodules, ocean floor 9 10 6. Ribbon asbestos ore, Quebec, Canada 13. Botryoidal fluorite ore, 11 12 13 14 7. Manganese ore, banded Poncha Springs, Colo. rhodochrosite 14. Tungsten ore, North Carolina Copper Deposits in Sedimentary and Volcanogenic Rocks By ELIZABETH B. TOURTELOT and JAMES D. VINE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF COPPER DEPOSITS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 907-C A geologic appraisal of low-temperature copper deposits formed by syngenetic, diagenetic, and epigenetic processes UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director First printing 1976 Second printing 1976 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Tourtelot, Elizabeth B. Copper deposits in sedimentary and volcanogenic rocks. (Geology and resources of copper) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 907-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:907-C 1. Copper ores. 2. Rocks, Sedimentary. 3. Rocks, Igneous. I. Vine, James David, 1921- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 907-C. TN440.T68 553'.43 76-608039 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Time Scale Lecture Notes
    Geological Time Scale Lecture Notes dewansEddy remains validly. ill-judged: Lefty is unhelpable: she leaf her she reinsurers phrases mediates inattentively too artfully?and postmarks Ruthenic her and annual. closed-door Fabio still crenellate his Seventh grade Lesson Geologic Time Mini Project. If i miss a lecture and primitive to copy a classmate's notes find a photocopying. Geologic Time Scale Age of free Earth subdivided into named and dated intervals. The Quaternary is even most recent geological period for time in trek's history spanning the unique two million. Geologic Time and Earth Science Lumen Learning. Explaining Events Study arrangement 3 in Figure B Note that. Do not get notified when each lecture notes to be taken in fact depends on plate boundaries in lecture notes with it was convinced from? Coloured minerals introduction to mining geology lecture notes ppt Mining. The geologic record indicates several ice surges interspersed with periods of. Lecture Notes Geologic Eras Geologic Timescale The geologic timetable is divided into 4 major eras The oldest era is called the Pre-Cambrian Era. 4 Mb Over long periods of debate many rocks change shape and ease as salary are. A Geologic Time Scale Measures the Evolution of Life system Review NotesHighlights Image Attributions ShowHide Details. Lecture notes lecture 26 Geological time scale StuDocu. You are encouraged to work together and review notes from lectures to flex on. These lecture notes you slip and indirect evidence of rocks, and phases and geological time scale lecture notes made by which help you? Index fossil any homicide or plant preserved in the department record write the bond that is characteristic of behavior particular complain of geologic time sensitive environment but useful index.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining, Geology, and Geological History of Garnet at the Barton Garnet Mine, Gore Mountain, New York William Kelly
    6: RARE EARTH ELEMENT AND YTTRIUM MINERAL OCCURENCES IN THE ADIRONDACK MOUNTAINS 7 MINING, GEOLOGY, AND GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF GARNET AT THE BARTON GARNET MINE, GORE MOUNTAIN, NEW YORK WILLIAM KELLY New York State Geologist, Emeritus, Division of Research and Collections, New York State Museum, Albany, NY 12230, [email protected] KEYWORDS: Garnet, Mining, Gore Mountain, Metamorphism, Lyon Mountain Granite ABSTRACT Garnet megacrysts commonly 30 centimters (cm) ranging up to 1 meter (m) in diameter occur at the summit of Gore Mountain, Adirondacks, NY and were mined there for abrasives for more than a century. The mine, owned by Barton Mines Co., LLC, is roughly 2 km x 150 m and is located in a hornblende-rich garnet amphibolite at the southern boundary of a metamorphosed olivine gabbro body that is in fault contact with charnockite. Barton supplies garnet, a chemically homogeneous pyrope-almandine, to the waterjet cutting, lapping, and abrasive coatings industries. The garnet megacrysts are reliably dated at 1049 ± 5 Ma. The growth of the garnet megacrysts was facilitated by an influx of hydrothermal fluid emanating from the ore body’s southern boundary fault. The fluids were most probably associated with the intrusion of the Lyon Mountain Granite (1049.9 ± 10 Ma) and/or associated pegmatitic rocks late in the tectonic history of the Adirondacks. INTRODUCTION The Adirondack Mountains in upstate New York are a small outlier of a larger body of rocks of similar age and geologic history that is located to the north in Canada. The Adirondack region can be loosely divided into amphibolite metamorphic facies Lowlands, in the northwest, and the granulite facies Central Highlands, which are 86 THE ADIRONDACK JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES VOLUME 21 87 7: MINING, GEOLOGY, AND GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF GARNET AT THE BARTON GARNET MINE, GORE MOUNTAIN, NEW YORK separated by a very large, northwest-dipping fault zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Economic Geology, 1905
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 1905. S. F. EMMONS, E. C. ECKEL, Geologists in Charge. INTRODUCTION. By C. W. HA YES, Geologist in Charge of Geology. This bulletin is the fourth of a series, including Bulletins Nos. 213, 225, and 260, Con­ tributions to Economic. Geology for 1902, 1903, and 1904, respectively. These bulletins are prepared primarily with a view to securing prompt publication of the economic results of investigations made by the United States Geological Survey. They are designed to meet the wants of the busy man, and are so condensed that he will bo able to obtain results and conclusions with a minimum expenditure of time and energy. They also afford a better idea of the work which the Survey.as an organization is carrying on for the direct advancement of mining interests throughout the country than can readily be obtained from the more voluminous reports. In the first two bulletins of this series were included numerous papers relating to the economic geology of Alaska. In view of the rapid increase of economic work both in Alaska and in the States and the organization-of a division of Alaskan mineral resource's, distinct from the division of geology, it was last year considered advisable to exclude all papers relating to Alaska. These were brought together in a separate volume entitled ".Report of Pi-ogress of Investigations of Mineral Resources of Alaska in 1904," Bulletin No. 259. A similar segregation of papers relating to Alaska has been made this year. In the preparation of the present volume promptness of publication has been made secondary only to the economic utility of the material presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Dept of Applied Geology 28092017.1.1
    Department of Applied Geology UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS Syllabus for M.Sc. and M.Phil. Applied Geology courses w.e.f. 2017-2018 Academic Year M.Sc. in Applied Geology Course Code Course Title C/E/S Credits I SEMESTER EAS C301 Physical Geology and Geomorphology C 4 EAS C302 Mineralogy and Instrumentation Techniques C 4 EAS C303 Mineralogy and Paleontology Practical C 4 EAS E301 Environmental Earth Science E 3 EAS E302 Stratigraphy of India E 3 EAS E303 Recent Trends in Paleontology E 3 UOM S001 Soft Skill-1 S 2 II SEMESTER EAS C304 Structural Geology and Geotectonics C 4 EAS C305 Applied Remote Sensing and GIS C 4 EAS C306 Field Mapping C 2 EAS C307 Structural Geology and Geotectonics Practical C 4 EAS C308 Petrology Practical C 4 EAS E304 Applied Petrology E 3 UOM S002 Soft Skill-2 S 2 III SEMESTER EAS C309 Exploration Geophysics C 4 EAS C310 Applied Hydrogeology C 4 EAS C311 Geophysics and Applied Hydrogeology Practical C 4 EAS E305 Disaster Management E 3 EAS E306 Economic Geology E 3 UOM S003 Soft Skill-3 S 2 UOM 1001 Internship I 2 IV SEMESTER EAS C312 Applied Geochemistry C 4 EAS C313 Engineering and Mining Geology C 4 Engineering, Mining Geology and Geochemistry EAS C314 C 4 Practical Page 1 of 43 EAS C315 Geological Field Tour C 2 EAS C316 Dissertation C 4 EAS E 307 Oceanography E 3 UOM S004 Soft Skill-4 S 2 ELECTIVES OFFERED TO OTHER DEPARTMENT STUDENTS EAS E308 Remote Sensing and GIS E 3 EAS E309 Climatology E 3 EAS E310 Environmental Geology E 3 EAS E311 Geological Oceanography E 3 I – SEMESTER EAS C 301 Physical Geology and Geomorphology C 3 1 0 4 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from Our Interim Department Head, Dr. M. Stephen Enders
    Colorado School of Mines College of Earth Resource Sciences and Engineering 2016 Department Newsletter Department of Geology and Geological Engineering Message from our Interim Department Head, Dr. M. Stephen Enders Welcome back to our Departmental Newsletter. The last issue was published in December 2014, and a lot of change occurred since then. For those of you wondering what happened, the Department went through quite a transition, and has come out even stronger than before and hell-bent on getting even better. This issue of the Newsletter focuses on news over the last year, and is still a work in pro- gress. There are probably some things you’d like to see us cover in subsequent newsletters, so please let us know. Ramona Graves, Dean of the College of Earth Resource Sciences and Engineering, asked me to take on the Interim Department Head position when Paul Santi stepped down to re-focus on his teaching and research interests in mid-May. Paul did an outstanding job lead- ing the Department through some rough times and re-establishing a healthy and invigorating culture. On behalf of the faculty and staff, I want to thank him again for all he has done for the Department and wish him great success in his teaching and research programs ahead. I am absolutely delighted to be the Interim Department Head. Some of you may know that I’m an alum of our Department having graduated with a BSc in 1976, and I’m honored to have been asked to take on the Department Head role. I have enjoyed a 40-year ca- reer in the mining business; and prior to joining the Department, I had been a Research Professor in the Mining Engineering Depart- ment with a joint appointment in GE since 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 23, No. the ORE.-BIN January 1961 STATE of OREGON Portland
    THE ORE BIN Volume 23, 1961 Vol. 23, No. THE ORE.-BIN January 1961 STATE OF OREGON Portland, Oregon DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Head Office: 1069 State Office Bldg., Portland 1, Oregon Telephone: CApitol 6-2161, Ext. 488 State Governing Board Hollis M. Dole, Director William Kennedy, Chairman, Portland Harold Banta Baker Stoff Earl S. Mollard Riddle R. G. Bowen Geologist Field Offices R. E. Corcoran Geologist 2033 First Street, Boker L. L. Hoogland Assayer and Chemist N. S. Wagner, Field Geologist Rolph S. Mason Mining Engineer H. C. Brooks, Field Geologist T. C. Matthews Spectroscopist 239 S. E. "H" Street, Grants Pass V. C. Newton, Jr. Petroleum Engineer Len Ramp, Field Geologist H. G. Schlicker Geologist Norman Peterson, Field Geologist M. L. Steere Geologist * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OREGON MINERAL PRODUCTION IN 1960 By Ralph S. Mason* Oregon's mineral industry produced its second highest value of row minerals in 1960. Following a nation-wide economic trend during the year, the industry was off approximately $3 million from lost year's record-breaking high of $49.8 million, according to preliminary estimates mode by the U. S. Bureau of Mines. The heavy construction commodities, crushed stone and sand and grovel, reflected construction log and were responsible for most of the change from lost year. Metal mining, aside from nickel, was quiet. The state's only uronium mine and one of the two mercury producers shut down. Industrial mineral products showed both gains and losses as compared to the previous year. Cement production was up 12 percent while clays declined 15 percent and diatomite 3 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • VITA J. Richard Kyle Third C. E. Yager Professor of Geology
    VITA J. Richard Kyle Third C. E. Yager Professor of Geology http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/researcher/richard_kyle/ Department of Geological Sciences and Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences 2275 Speedway, C9000, EPS1.130 The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712-1101 Phone: 512-471-4351; FAX 512-471-9425; E-mail: [email protected] Licensed Professional Geoscientist, Texas License 4148 February 2020 EDUCATION: Ph.D., Geology, 1977, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada M.S., Geology, 1973, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee B.S., Geology, 1970, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee SIGNIFICANT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2012 to date Professor, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin 2005 to 2010 Research Professor, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin 2003 to date Registered Professional Geoscientist, Texas License #4148 2000 to date Associate, Long Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin 1990 to date Professor; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin 1980 to date Consulting Geologist, various clients 1984 to 1990 Associate Professor; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas Spring, 1983 Research Associate, Bureau of Economic Geology; University of Texas at Austin 1978 to 1984 Assistant Professor; Dept of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin 1976 to 1978 Exploration Geologist; Exxon Minerals Company, U.S.A; Rhinelander, WI PROFESSIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Geology Brian John Exton Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 [email protected]
    Exploring Geology on the World-Wide Web - Economic Geology Brian John Exton Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 [email protected] Keywords: Earth science - teaching and curriculum; ENERGY LINKS education - computer assisted; economic geology - gen- eral and mining geology; economic geology - energy U.S. Department of Energy - EIA sources; economic geology - metals; economic geology - http://www.eia.doe.gov/ nonmetals. Home page for the Energy Information Admin- istration, with access to hundreds of technical publi- INTRODUCTION cations (mostly PDF or HTML files) relating to energy You might think that the state of knowledge in production. geology is governed solely by our curiosity about the U.S. Department of Energy - ESTEEM inner worhngs of the Earth. But the origin of geology http://www.sandia.gov/ESTEEM as a scientific study was also forged by the need for Educational site for the ESTEEM program (Educa- the raw materials necessarv for manufacturing" and tion in Science, Technology, Energy, Engineering, and energy production, as well as the desire for precious Math). Select the gas station on the clickable map to metals and gems. The history and development of learn more about fossil fuel-related technologies. every industrialized nation is intricately tied to its supply of natural resources. Economic geology, there- USGS Mineral Resources Program fore, is one of the oldest and most basic fields of geo- http://minerals.er.usgs.gov/ logic study. Current statistical information on the occurrence, The economic aspects of precious metals and gems, quality, quantity, and availability of mineral resources as well as water resources, were covered in previous in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Geology
    Ore Deposits and Mining Useful for: Module 5: Petrology – Mining Geology 40% of a smartphone is made from 23 different metals (as in the periodic table) that need to be mined from the Earth’s crust. Electric cables and appliances contain copper that comes from an ore deposit. Civilization moved through the use of various materials that are employed to label key stages of human evolution such as the ‘Bronze Age’ and ‘Iron Age’. The metals used by primitive and historic civilisations were extracted from rocks available at the surface or by digging few tens of meters deep. This represents the origin of mining and it dates back to 41,000-43,000 years ago (Ngwenya Mine, Swaziland – figure 1). Figure 1: Ngwenya Mine, in Swaziland. Characteristic stepped structure (open pit) used by bushmen to extract hematite, an iron ore. Source: afro tourism. The vast majority of the rocks that outcrop at the Earth’s surface or lay tens to hundreds of metres below it contains metallic minerals, from which pure metals can be extracted. However, these operations are very costly and only if a set of conditions such as feasible access, favourable local and national legislation, large enough size and concentration of the metal are in place mining operation can start. Figure 2: Vein with chalcopyrite (brass Figure 3: Wolframite (dark grey-black) a colour) a copper mineral, surrounded by tungsten mineral in a quartz vein (white quartz (white) hosted by a grey limestone mineral). FOV 10 cm. Photo G. Solferino. rock. FOV 4 cm. Photo G. Solferino. It is impossible to provide a thorough list of all types of ore deposits, especially since new horizons are opening up such as ‘deep sea mining’ and the use of bacteria and/or fungi to remove metals from rocks, but it is worth summarizing some of the main categories of ores currently used for producing the most important metals: Ore type Metals extracted Geologic setting Example Layered Mafic Intrusions Cr, PGE* Magmatic - intrusive Bushveld (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    WASHINGTON . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. HENRY LANDES, STA TE GEOLOGIST. VOLUME I. ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1901. OLYMPIA, WA.Sa: GWIN HICKS, . STATE PRINTER, 1902. (} • BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. HENRY McBRIDE, Preaident. Governor of Washington. C. w. MAYNA.RD, Secretary. Treasurer of Washington. F. P. GRAVES, President of the University of Washington. E. A. BRYAN, President of the Washington Agrtoultural College and School of Soienoe. STA.FF OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. HENRY LANDES, • . State Geologist. Professor of Geology, University of Washington. SOLON SHEDD, • Geologist. Professor of Geology, Washington Agrioultural College and Sohool of Soienoe. w. s. THYNG, . Geol<Jg-ist. Professor of Mining Engineering, Washington Agrtoultural College and School of Science. D. A. LYON, Geol<Jgist. Late Professor ot Mining Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Washington. • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. To His Excellency, HENRY McBRIDE, Governor of the State of Washing­ ton and President of the Board of Geological Survey: Srn-I have the honor to present herewith the annual report of the State Geological Survey for the year 1901. It embraces a preliminary account of the geology and mineral resources of the state, to which is added a bibliography of the literature re­ ferring to Washington geology. It is hoped that this report, while very general in its nature, may serve as a basis for more elaborate and detailed reports in future years. Very respectfully, HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. UNIVEBSITY OF W ASBING'l'ON, SJIIATTLE, March, 1902. CONTENTS. PART I. PAGEi, CREATION OF A STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,, BY HENRY LANDES, 3 Introduction . • . 3 The:La.w Establishing the Survey. 4 Organization of the Board of Geological Survey.
    [Show full text]