DOCSLIB.ORG

Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012' H-Urban Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012' Review published on Monday, February 26, 2018 Simon Ward. Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012. Cities and Cultures Series. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016. 212 pp. $105.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-90-8964-853-2. Reviewed by Jan Musekamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina) Published on H-Urban (February, 2018) Commissioned by Alexander Vari Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=49427 Asynchrony across the East-West Divide: Changing Urban Memory in Berlin For the second half of the twentieth century, Berlin seemed to be the prototype not only of a divided city but also of a diverging urban memory. However, despite the political and physical barriers, larger cultural developments such as modernism and trends in urban reconstruction transcended the East-West dichotomy. In his book, Simon Ward looks at the mechanisms of urban memory and its changes, using a visual culture approach and focusing “not on what happened ‘here’, in the past, but what happened to the site” (p. 13). His notion of the “asynchronous city” is opposed to the idea of a synchronic city, comparable to the completely structured “organization of attention in a modern museum at the beginning of the twentieth century” (p. 20). Along with David Frisby, Ward “suggests a way out of this perception of a determinist cityscape” (p. 21). Thus, he follows Walter Benjamin’s strolling of the city, making sense of temporal contradictions in the urban space as part of the experience of modernity. The starting year of the analysis is 1957 (time of the West Berlin International Building Exhibition Interbau), and the concluding year is 2012. In the introduction, Ward develops his theoretical framework, based on the work of such well-known scholars as Pierre Nora, Paul Connerton, Maurice Halbwachs, Aleida and Jan Assmann, and Walter Benjamin, among many others. He works with well-elaborated approaches from memory and visual culture studies. Ward focuses on architecture/urban planning, memorials, and film/photography as three formative parts of urban memory. In chapter 1, Ward addresses the “murdered city” between 1957 and 1974. It is astonishing to see the long-lasting shadow of wartime destruction on city planning and visual representations. The 1957 International Building Exhibition in Berlin proved to be the culmination not only of the main focus on traffic planning but also of a “synchronic gaze,” as criticized by an increasing part of the population. The corresponding example from the Eastern part was the decision to demolish the Berlin Palace (Stadtschloss) in 1950. However, starting from the late 1960s, official policies to preserve the (traditional) city image as enshrined in the term “Stadtbildpflege” gained ground in both East and West Berlin. Wim Wenders’s movie Summer in the City (1970) was one such plea for an asynchronous city—with The Legend of Paul and Paula (1973) being its more famous counterpart from the East. Chapter 2 is dedicated to “place memory work” in both parts of the divided city between 1975 and Citation: H-Net Reviews. Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012'. H-Urban. 02-26-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22277/reviews/1446587/musekamp-ward-urban-memory-and-visual-culture-berlin-framing Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Urban 1983 (not 1989 as the table of contents suggests). Ward’s starting point is the International Building Exhibition initiated in 1979. He observes a sharp turn in urban planning toward the recognition of Berlin’s “genetic structure” (p. 39). Also, this period brought forth new approaches in film and photography, increasingly dissecting the previous “synchronic urban gaze” (p. 40). In chapter 3, Ward spans the outcome of not only the 1979 International Building Exhibition but also projects connected with Berlin’s millennial anniversary in1987 , as well as with the fall of the Wall. During this period, Berlin was reconceptualized as a “Remembered City on Display,” as a “repository of the past” (pp. 113, 121), as addressed in the exhibitionMythos Berlin, in Wenders’s ever-famous Himmel über Berlin (Wings of Desire) (1987), or through the reconstruction of the Nikolaiviertel in East Berlin. Chapter 4 addresses developments in the unified city between 1993 and 2012—characterized by an ongoing “commercial rehabilitation of ‘obsolete’ housing” on the one hand and an “anti-capitalist rejection”on the other (pp. 142, 143)—with the Potsdamer Platz and the Tacheles being two sides of the same coin. Ward elaborates on the contentious discussions regarding the tearing down of the Palace of the Republic and the reconstruction of the Berlin Palace—comparing it to earlier discussions regarding the fate of the Kaiser William Memorial Church. However, in the case of the palace, it seems as if advocates of a synchronic city prevailed. The author’s methodological and theoretical acumen are impressive and shed new light on developments in both parts of the city, hitherto analyzed separately. Ward organized his chapters chronologically, defying traditional breaks in the history of Berlin, such as 1961 or 1989. He thus overcomes the long-standing Cold War approach and highlights the simultaneous twists and turns in urban memory in both parts of the city. While this arrangement is intriguing, the book sometimes lacks a more general historical context—with regard to local, national, and international developments, for example, in urban planning. To give just one example, 1957 is a symbolic year rather than a real caesura since discussions on reconstruction at the time already had been going on for years if not decades—not only in East and West Berlin but also in the wider world. Also, as the author himself suggests, the 1950 decision to destroy the City Castle seems to be another possible point of departure. Another weakness of the book is the sparse reference to novel analyses of the Berlin urban landscape that occurred in German, such as Florian Urban’s research on the Nikolaiviertel in East Berlin or Franziska Schmidt’s and Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper’s book on the Südliches Hansaviertel in West Berlin.[1] However, this book is highly recommended to all those who look for a new comprehensive approach toward postwar urban memory cultures in Berlin. It combines the implementation of accepted theories with a visual culture approach on the built environment and photography/film—simultaneously moving beyond the East-West divide as enshrined in the traditional 1945/1961/1989 narrative. Note [1]. Florian Urban, Neo-historical East Berlin: Architecture and Urban Design in the German Democratic Republic 1970-1990 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 99-142; and Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper and Franziska Schmidt, Das Hansaviertel: Internationale Nachkriegsmoderne in Berlin (Berlin: Verlag Citation: H-Net Reviews. Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012'. H-Urban. 02-26-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22277/reviews/1446587/musekamp-ward-urban-memory-and-visual-culture-berlin-framing Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Urban Bauwesen, 1999), 8-45. Citation: Jan Musekamp. Review of Ward, Simon,Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012. H-Urban, H-Net Reviews. February, 2018.URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=49427 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Musekamp on Ward, 'Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City 1957-2012'. H-Urban. 02-26-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22277/reviews/1446587/musekamp-ward-urban-memory-and-visual-culture-berlin-framing Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: the Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin'
    H-Urban Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin' Review published on Friday, September 11, 2020 Paul Stangl. Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018. 352 pp. $65.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-5036-0320-2. Reviewed by Jan Musekamp (University of Pittsburgh) Published on H-Urban (September, 2020) Commissioned by Alexander Vari (Marywood University) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=54596 Beyond Socialist Remodeling: Rebuilding East Berlin, 1945-61 Given its tumultuous history, it is not surprising that numerous scholars focus on postwar Berlin’s changing urban landscape. This is an interdisciplinary endeavor, with architects, urban planners, historians, and art historians looking at the city from markedly different perspectives.[1] Paul Stangl is a geographer by training and adds to this growing body of scholarship on the divided city. His focus is on the twenty-five years between the end of the Second World War and the construction of the infamous Berlin Wall—a time when Germany and the entire European continent “rose from ruins,” as the GDR national anthem put it. However, the Berlin case is unique for a number of reasons. First, the former German capital quickly developed into the front city of the Cold War. Second, as a result of this geopolitical background, both East and West Berlin served as showcases of the ideologies clashing here. Third, Berlin soon became a truly divided city in both spatial and ideological ways. Here, architects and urban planners often had to make decisions that followed not only general trends in urban planning but also ideological guidelines or directives.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel with the Metropolitan Museum of Art
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Travel with Met Classics The Met BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB May 9–15, 2022 Berlin with Christopher Noey Lecturer BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Berlin Dear Members and Friends of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Berlin pulses with creativity and imagination, standing at the forefront of Europe’s art world. Since the fall of the Wall, the German capital’s evolution has been remarkable. Industrial spaces now host an abundance of striking private art galleries, and the city’s landscapes have been redefined by cutting-edge architecture and thought-provoking monuments. I invite you to join me in May 2022 for a five-day, behind-the-scenes immersion into the best Berlin has to offer, from its historic museum collections and lavish Prussian palaces to its elegant opera houses and electrifying contemporary art scene. We will begin with an exploration of the city’s Cold War past, and lunch atop the famous Reichstag. On Museum Island, we
    [Show full text]
  • Lange Nacht Der Museen JUNGE WILDE & ALTE MEISTER
    31 AUG 13 | 18—2 UHR Lange Nacht der Museen JUNGE WILDE & ALTE MEISTER Museumsinformation Berlin (030) 24 74 98 88 www.lange-nacht-der- M u s e e n . d e präsentiert von OLD MASTERS & YOUNG REBELS Age has occupied man since the beginning of time Cranach’s »Fountain of Youth«. Many other loca- – even if now, with Europe facing an ageing popula- tions display different expression of youth culture tion and youth unemployment, it is more relevant or young artist’s protests: Mail Art in the Akademie than ever. As far back as antiquity we find unsparing der Künste, street art in the Kreuzberg Museum, depictions of old age alongside ideal figures of breakdance in the Deutsches Historisches Museum young athletes. Painters and sculptors in every and graffiti at Lustgarten. epoch have tackled this theme, demonstrating their The new additions to the Long Night programme – virtuosity in the characterisation of the stages of the Skateboard Museum, the Generation 13 muse- life. In history, each new generation has attempted um and the Ramones Museum, dedicated to the to reform society; on a smaller scale, the conflict New York punk band – especially convey the atti- between young and old has always shaped the fami- tude of a generation. There has also been a genera- ly unit – no differently amongst the ruling classes tion change in our team: Wolf Kühnelt, who came up than the common people. with the idea of the Long Night of Museums and The participating museums have creatively picked who kept it vibrant over many years, has passed on up the Long Night theme – in exhibitions, guided the management of the project.We all want to thank tours, films, talks and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Circling Opera in Berlin by Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College
    Circling Opera in Berlin By Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College, 2001 A.M., Brown University, 2004 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in the Department of Music at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 This dissertation by Paul Martin Chaikin is accepted in its present form by the Department of Music as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_______________ _________________________________ Rose Rosengard Subotnik, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Jeff Todd Titon, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Philip Rosen, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Dana Gooley, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Deutsche Akademische Austauch Dienst (DAAD) for funding my fieldwork in Berlin. I am also grateful to the Institut für Musikwissenschaft und Medienwissenschaft at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin for providing me with an academic affiliation in Germany, and to Prof. Dr. Christian Kaden for sponsoring my research proposal. I am deeply indebted to the Deutsche Staatsoper Unter den Linden for welcoming me into the administrative thicket that sustains operatic culture in Berlin. I am especially grateful to Francis Hüsers, the company’s director of artistic affairs and chief dramaturg, and to Ilse Ungeheuer, the former coordinator of the dramaturgy department. I would also like to thank Ronny Unganz and Sabine Turner for leading me to secret caches of quantitative data. Throughout this entire ordeal, Rose Rosengard Subotnik has been a superlative academic advisor and a thoughtful mentor; my gratitude to her is beyond measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Personal Non-Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge
    Hobbs, Mark (2010) Visual representations of working-class Berlin, 1924–1930. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2182/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Visual representations of working-class Berlin, 1924–1930 Mark Hobbs BA (Hons), MA Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD Department of History of Art Faculty of Arts University of Glasgow February 2010 Abstract This thesis examines the urban topography of Berlin’s working-class districts, as seen in the art, architecture and other images produced in the city between 1924 and 1930. During the 1920s, Berlin flourished as centre of modern culture. Yet this flourishing did not exist exclusively amongst the intellectual elites that occupied the city centre and affluent western suburbs. It also extended into the proletarian districts to the north and east of the city. Within these areas existed a complex urban landscape that was rich with cultural tradition and artistic expression. This thesis seeks to redress the bias towards the centre of Berlin and its recognised cultural currents, by exploring the art and architecture found in the city’s working-class districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounters with Otherness in Berlin: Xenophobia, Xenophilia, and Projective Identification
    Encounters with Otherness in Berlin: Xenophobia, Xenophilia, and Projective Identification CONTRIBUTIONS BY ZARTOSHT AHLERS ‘18 ELENA ANAMOS ‘19 LEILA BEN HALIM. ‘20 WILLIAM GREAR ‘20 SYDNEY JORDAN ‘19 EMILY KUNKEL ‘19 NATE LAMBERT ‘20 ALEXIA MARTINEZ ‘20 APRIA PINKETT ‘20 IRMA QAVOLLI ‘20 ALAA RAGAB ‘20 RAINA SEYD ‘19 YANG SHAO ‘20 SAM VALLE ‘19 SADIE VAN VRANKEN ’19 : EDITED AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY JOHN BORNEMAN © 2017 Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies With special thanks to the Department of Anthropology, Princeton University. COVER PHOTO: “There was a big hot air balloon that we passed that said “politics needs a worldview” in German. I liked this message. It was a comforting first impression.” - Emily Kunkel TABLE OF CONTENTS PROFESSOR JOHN BORNEMAN APRIA PINKETT ’20 Introduction . 3 German Culture: The Most Exclusive Club . 44 ZARTOSHT AHLERS ’18 German Culture in Three Words: Beer, Currywurst, and Money . 62 Leopoldplatz . 7 Bergmann Burger: There’s No Place Encounter With a Turkish Like Home . 79 Immigrant at Leopoldplatz . 12 Ich Spreche Englisch . 85 Movement . 25 So Loud . 88 IRMA QAVOLLI ’20 ELENA ANAMOS ’19 An Unexpected Conversation . 17 Cultural Belonging: Belonging: Body Language Childbearing and Channel Surfing: in a Conversation on Foreignness . 23 A Reunion with My Family . 40 A Market Conversation . 48 An Encounter Over Ice Cream Food . 69 in Leopoldplatz . 71 The Language Barrier in Hermannplatz . 83 ALAA RAGAB ’20 JOHN BENJAMIN, LANGUAGE INSTRUCTOR Let’s Test You for Explosives Residue! . .19 Arab is Better, Arab is More Fun . 28 Language: Change in Global Seminars . 82 Germans Nice or Nein? .
    [Show full text]
  • Schlüteriana III
    Schlüteriana III Kevin E. Kandt Schlüteriana III Studies in the Art, Life, and Milieu of Andreas Schlüter (c. 1659 – 1714) Lukas Verlag Cover: Andreas Schlüter and Johann Jacobi. Sarcophagus for King Friedrich I of Prussia – Detail of the Emblematic Figural Group (1713). Berlin Cathedral. I would like to thank my father, Glenn J. Kandt, for his most generous financial assistance during the preparation of this book. Without his steadfast support, it might have never come to fruition. © by Lukas Verlag Erstausgabe, 1. Auflage 2015 Redaktionsschluss: 31. März 2014 Alle Rechte vorbehalten Lukas Verlag für Kunst- und Geistesgeschichte Kollwitzstraße 57 D–10405 Berlin www.lukasverlag.com Umschlag: Verlag Reprographie und Satz: Susanne Werner, Frank Böttcher Druck: Elbe Druckerei Wittenberg Printed in Germany ISBN 978-3-86732-183-9 Table of Contents Forward 7 Quis Evadet? Nemo 15 A Study of the Funerary Monuments by Andreas Schlüter in Poland and Germany Part Two: Germany (1694–1713) I The Berlin Years: A New Beginning in Brandenburg-Prussia 17 II Schlüter, Döbel, or Weyhenmeyer? The Derfflinger Epitaph 31 III A Questionable Schlüter Attribution: The Barfus Epitaph 73 IV Vera Philosophia Mortis est Meditatio: The Männlich Tomb Portal 79 V Excursus: A Commemorative Print for M. D. Marschall von Bieberstein 99 VI Schlüter’s Palace and its Influence 104 VII A Fitting Memorial to a Departed Husband: The Marwitz Epitaph (Groß Rietz) 109 VIII Cunctus Mors Una Manet: The Sarcophagus for Queen Sophie Charlotte 129 IX A Second Tribute to a Deceased Spouse:
    [Show full text]
  • Losing the Palast: the Demolition of Berlin's Most Promising Kunsthalle
    JW-13 GERMANY Jill Winder is a Donors’ Fellow of the Institute studying post-reunification Germany through the ICWA work and attitudes of its artists. LETTERS Losing the Palast: The Demolition of Berlin’s Since 1925 the Institute of Current World Affairs (the Crane- Most Promising Kunsthalle Rogers Foundation) has provided long-term fellowships to enable By Jill Winder outstanding young professionals JANUARY 2006 to live outside the United States BERLIN–People from both sides of the Atlantic often ask me to compare the art and write about international scenes in New York City and Berlin. My answer has not changed in the last five areas and issues. An exempt years. I tell them that New York has an amazing contemporary art infrastructure, operating foundation endowed by with dozens of important galleries, world-class museums, and a bevy of art col- the late Charles R. Crane, the lectors who drive the market. The downside is that a lot of mediocre art (at least of Institute is also supported by the contemporary variety) circulates within this sophisticated system. Berlin has contributions from like-minded the opposite problem: Although there are arguably more talented, internation- individuals and foundations. ally-recognized artists here than in any other location in the world, the art infra- structure is underdeveloped, with uninteresting museums for contemporary art and good galleries struggling because of the lack of art market. Put simply, New York has TRUSTEES a lot of great spaces and a limited number of exceptional artists, while Berlin has a multi- Bryn Barnard tude of first-rate artists who have virtually no place to show their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal State of Berlin 2011 Cultural Funding Report
    the place to be EPORT R BERLIN 2011 CULTURAL FUNDING BERLIN 2011 CULTURAL Federal State of Berlin 2011 F FEDERAL STATE O FEDERAL STATE Cultural Funding Report Publisher: The Governing Mayor of Berlin Senate Chancellery – Cultural Affairs Kulturförderbericht-Titel_Englisch_12-1-25.indd 1 31.01.12 17:42 Federal State of Berlin 2011 Cultural Funding Report Publisher: The Governing Mayor of Berlin, Senate Chancellery – Cultural Affairs Preface Art, culture, and the creative community are among Berlin’s key resources. The large number of leading insti- tutions, creative communities, international figures and organizations based in Berlin have made the city the “place to be” for the contemporary arts at both a national and international level. Interest in Berlin and the city’s cultural policies continues to grow in Germany and abroad. The present report offers an overview of the various cultural funding programmes in Berlin to both interested visitors and citizens of this lively metropolis. This concise report offers insights into the core aspects of cultural funding in Berlin. Constant change is a defining feature of Berlin’s cultural landscape, and painting a complete picture of this constantly evolving artistic and cultural metropolis with its diverse cast of organizations, communities, individuals and locations is, perhaps, an impossible undertaking. Given these circumstances, the report endeavours to provide an overview of the major frameworks rather than an exhaustive account of the countless cultural funding programmes in Berlin. Further information on institutions which receive funding through our programmes is available in the appendix to this report, and on the Cultural Affairs website as noted within the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeus in Exile: Archaeological Restitution As Politics of Memory
    Working Paper Series, 13 Zeus in Exile: Archaeological Restitution as Politics of Memory S.M. Can Bilsel Working Paper #13, Fall 2000 Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies [email protected] (609) 258-5180) The Zeus Altar of Pergamon in Berlin Overshadowed by the debates on the Holocaust Memorial or the fate of the Berlin Wall, the reunification of archaeological collections in Berlin nevertheless poses an international problem. The question is, in a way, analogous to the current sensibilities about the future of memory, as it was called by a recent conference at Princeton University. How will the past will be framed and commemorated in a reunified Germany; what constitutes the cultural heritage of the new Berlin Republic? As Berlin assumes the role of the capital, both official and popular approaches to memory of the recent past gain a vital importance. Curiously, an internationally recognized effort on the part of the federal government to commemorate the victims of the Nazi regime goes hand in hand with a systematic repression of the more recent East German past. As the American-style malls and corporate headquarters of the Postdamer Platz, once the busiest center of Europe, celebrate the victors of the Cold War, the institutions of the East German Republic are being erased from the city. New Berlin will be a city of memory, as evident in its memorials and museums. Yet it will also remain a site of amnesia and forgetting. This paper will discuss Berlin’s contested Zeus Altar and its role as a collectively negotiated construct of memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographer Frank Theil on Today's Berlin
    Thaddeus-Johns, Josie. “Photographer Frank Theil On Today’s Berlin: ‘No Boundaries Between People’.” Culture Trip. September 25, 2019. Photographer Frank Thiel continues to document the transformation of Berlin following the fall of the Wall | (c) Antony Sojka-Metcalfe / Culture Trip Photographer Frank Thiel has made a career out of keeping his lens fixed on the constant transformation of Berlin, a city still dealing with the trauma of being cleaved in two. Much has changed, much has been lost, and much has been created, but the German capital still marches to its own beat, led by some of the world’s most forward-thinking creatives. A castle is being reconstructed right in the centre of Berlin. The Humboldt Forum at Schloßplatz will combine two of the city’s biggest museum collections and will open in phases over the next two years. The first version of the Berlin Palace (Stadtschloss) came down in 1950, demolished by the German Democratic Republic to make room for its parliament building, the Palast der Republik, which then suffered a similar fate in 2008. Boxhagener Straße is lined with a number of shops and restaurants © Tony Sojka / Culture Trip The current architectural development is of particular interest to artist Frank Thiel, who photographed the Palast der Republik just before demolition began, in 2003, as part of a series of untitled works about the changing architecture of Berlin after the Wall fell. These images often single out the endless interlocking triangles of a building’s rafters, or the vast floors of a desolate building, producing a moment of tense stillness.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Incoherent Renovation in Berlin: Is There a Way
    New Design Ideas Vol.3, No.1, 2019, pp.60-78 INCOHERENT RENOVATION IN BERLIN: IS THERE A WAY FORWARD? Malcolm Millais Independent researcher, Porto, Portugal Abstract. This paper briefly describes the fates of four of Berlin‟s most iconic cultural buildings. These are the Berlin Palace, the Neues Museum, the Berlin Dom (Cathedral) and the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church. Using a variety of historical styles, all these buildings were built, or finished, in the nineteenth century, and all suffered serious damage due to aerial bombing in the Second World War. As all were repairable, the obvious choice might seem to reinstate them to their original condition: but this did not happen to any of them. This paper examines the incoherence of the various renovations, and briefly addresses the problem of formulating a coherent approach to renovation, particularly with reference to the 1964 Venice Charter. Keywords: Berlin, renovation, Venice Charter, iconic buildings, war damage, monstrous carbuncle, wartime bombing, cultural destruction. Corresponding Author: Malcolm Millais, Porto, Portugal, e-mail: [email protected] Received: 4 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 28 June 2019. 1. Introduction What can be said about all four of the buildings examined here is that: All, except in some aspects the Neues Museum, were extremely solidly built, so, given routine maintenance, could have be expected to have lasted for probably hundreds of years. All were severely damaged by aerial bombing during the Second World War. All were repairable. All suffered further destruction due to various political ideologies such as Communism, Modernism and Nationalism. All have been reinstated in a variety of ways, none of which are universally accepted.
    [Show full text]