Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: the Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: the Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin' H-Urban Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin' Review published on Friday, September 11, 2020 Paul Stangl. Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018. 352 pp. $65.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-5036-0320-2. Reviewed by Jan Musekamp (University of Pittsburgh) Published on H-Urban (September, 2020) Commissioned by Alexander Vari (Marywood University) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=54596 Beyond Socialist Remodeling: Rebuilding East Berlin, 1945-61 Given its tumultuous history, it is not surprising that numerous scholars focus on postwar Berlin’s changing urban landscape. This is an interdisciplinary endeavor, with architects, urban planners, historians, and art historians looking at the city from markedly different perspectives.[1] Paul Stangl is a geographer by training and adds to this growing body of scholarship on the divided city. His focus is on the twenty-five years between the end of the Second World War and the construction of the infamous Berlin Wall—a time when Germany and the entire European continent “rose from ruins,” as the GDR national anthem put it. However, the Berlin case is unique for a number of reasons. First, the former German capital quickly developed into the front city of the Cold War. Second, as a result of this geopolitical background, both East and West Berlin served as showcases of the ideologies clashing here. Third, Berlin soon became a truly divided city in both spatial and ideological ways. Here, architects and urban planners often had to make decisions that followed not only general trends in urban planning but also ideological guidelines or directives. Stangl’s main subject is the urban landscape and the meaning assigned to its different elements, with a special emphasis on the ideological shifts occurring between 1945 and 1961. In the introduction, Stangl identifies eight major discourses (or “pathways,” as he calls these urban planning and ideological trends) that shaped the rebuilding of East Berlin after 1945. In his book, he focuses mostly on the interplay of modernism, preservationism, and socialist realism. In the first chapter, the author examines “the purge of symbolic elements” (p. 24) incompatible with the new regime’s ideology. Drawing from Maoz Azaryahu’s work on Berlin street names, he describes how the Soviet Military Administration and East German Communists superseded the previous, Prussian- German-dominated memoryscape with a new one that heralded the commemoration of the antifascist fight and the sacrifice of Soviet troops during the Second World War—as manifested in the vast Soviet soldiers’ memorial in Berlin-Treptow. The second chapter focuses on the development of rebuilding plans against the backdrop of ideological shifts. In the beginning, urban planners developed modernist proposals for a still-united city—most notably Hans Scharoun’s 1946 exhibition in the Imperial Palace. This would change after the 1948 split of the city government, when Eastern and Western planning efforts slowly drifted Citation: H-Net Reviews. Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin'. H-Urban. 09-11-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22277/reviews/6425992/musekamp-stangl-risen-ruins-cultural-politics-rebuilding-east-berlin Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Urban apart. In the East, socialist realism would be the dominant style in the 1950s. Stangl tellingly calls these comprehensive plans for East Berlin “ephemeral urban visions” (p. 102), since not a single one was actually put into practice. In chapters 3 to 6 Stangl elaborates on four relevant case studies, namely Unter den Linden, the Berlin Palace grounds turned Marx-Engels Square, the government quarter on Wilhelmstraße, and the massive housing building program on Stalinallee (Karl-Marx-Allee). Shifting between questions of adequate housing, state representation, and ideology, Stangl demonstrates how the different currents mentioned in the introduction influenced the decision making—in many cases going far beyond a simplistic idea of a uniform socialist city transformation. In these thoroughly researched case studies, maps and archival images help to carve out the “place-based meaning” (p. 4) of urban planning as intended by the author. This is especially true for the discussions around the ruins of the Imperial Palace—hated symbol of Prussian militarism for some and grand architecture for others. In the late 1940s, it seemed that urban planners could agree on the renovation of at least part of the huge structure. However, for ideological reasons, the early GDR’s most powerful leader, Walter Ulbricht, ordered the 1950 demolition of the structure to create space for large parade grounds. On Wilhelmstraße, the need for office space on the one hand and the administrative building’s National Socialist legacy on the other clashed and led to a compromise where Hitler’s chancellery was destroyed but the former Ministry of Aviation building was adapted to host GDR ministries. The strengths of the book are undoubtedly the in-depth research behind the analysis as well as the ability of the author to break down theoretical debates (such as those about the meaning of socialist realism) to their manifestation in urban space. Other aspects of the book are not that convincing. Most importantly, as a book claiming to make an important contribution to urban memory cultures, it lacks profound engagement with theories of memory as articulated by Pierre Nora, Aleida Assmann, and others. While this is not a significant void in the book's case studies, it shows in the subchapter on the Soviet memorial in Treptow. Here, the author suggests that this ensemble is a unique Soviet or Communist approach to commemoration. However, it is deeply rooted in global ways of commemorating the fallen with tombs of unknown soldiers, including guards of honor and eternal flames. Also, it is not entirely clear why the author claims that 1961 is an important caesura for urban planning—other than for dramaturgical purposes, following the turns of the Cold War narrative. It seems as if the Berlin Wall did not overly influence urban planning in East Berlin—if one leaves aside the demolitions needed to create the infamous death strip on the border. Rather, it was at the end of the 1950s, and not 1961, that a shift from socialist realism back to modernism occurred. Also, this was a time when prefabricated housing took off (as seen in the Stalinallee’s housing construction of the late 1950s and early 1960s).[2] Moreover, as the author correctly states in the introduction, “key individuals could play prominent roles” in the planning process of the city (p. 6). However, Stangl rarely elaborates on the professional background of the numerous planners involved. The case is clear for Walter Ulbricht, who was not an architect but a Stalinist politician whose vision was to create a parade ground beyond the scale of the Red Square. On the contrary, most architects of both East and West Berlin had enjoyed a similar prewar education and were influenced by international trends continuing after 1945 (or 1961, for that matter). These close connections existed even across the newly erected ideological barriers and manifested themselves in urban developments that referred to each other—an East-West dialogue Stangl rarely mentions in his study. One such example is Hans Scharoun, who for some time remained affiliated with institutions in East Berlin and was responsible for some structures on Stalin-Allee. However, in the 1960s and 1970s he became the Citation: H-Net Reviews. Musekamp on Stangl, 'Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin'. H-Urban. 09-11-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22277/reviews/6425992/musekamp-stangl-risen-ruins-cultural-politics-rebuilding-east-berlin Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Urban architect of the famous Berlin Philharmonic concert hall and the State Library in West Berlin, next to the Wall. Finally, the book would also have profited from more accurate copy editing. This is especially annoying in the case of typos in German names (e.g., Schlögl instead of Schlögel, Deutcher instead of Deutscher, etc.) Despite some shortcomings, this book is highly recommended to all those interested in early GDR planning in Berlin. It will be especially valuable for history and urban planning students (and well- informed tourists) making their way across the architectural layers of Berlin’s East. For those who want to know more about the transformation of East Berlin after 1961, the reviewer recommends Simon Ward’s book, Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin. Notes [1]. To name just a few more recent works: Simon Ward, Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin: Framing the Asynchronous City, 1957-2012 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016); Emily Pugh, Architecture, Politics, and Identity in Divided Berlin (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2014); and Florian Urban, Neo-historical East Berlin: Architecture and Urban Design in the German Democratic Republic, 1970-1990 (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009). [2]. For a non-Cold War narrative of Berlin city planning, see Ward,Urban Memory and Visual Culture in Berlin. Paul Stangl. Risen from Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2018. 40 illustrations. 332 pp. $65 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-5036-0320-2. Beyond Socialist Remodeling: Rebuilding East Berlin, 1945-1961 Given its tumultuous history, it is not surprising that numerous scholars focus on postwar Berlin’s changing urban landscape. This is an interdisciplinary endeavor with architects, urban planners, historians and art historians looking at the city from markedly different perspectives. [1] Paul Stangl is a geographer by training and adds to this growing body of scholarship on the divided city.
Recommended publications
  • Francesca Rogier
    The Other Parliam ent in th e Francesca Rogier 07 When the Reichstag, seat of the German parliament Fig. 1 Aerial view of the Palast and the surrounding area. The 190 m from 1889 to 1933, was re-dedicated as the new home long building, placed 180' to the for- mer palace footprint, marks a of the Bundestag last April, another parliament build- sequence of open spaces moving ing gazed vacantly from the foot of Unter east from Marx-Engels-Platz at the westward foot of Unter den Linden to the Marx- Engels-Forum, the 1 969 TV tower, den Linden. The Pa/ost (^er Re^wfaZ/fc, the monolith overlooking and Alexanderplatz. Wrapped in a Marx-Engels-Platz in the heart of Berlin that once housed the East marble base, the Palast's rear eleva- German Volkskammer, might as well have been worlds away, so tion makes contact with the Spree in a lateral walkway and boat landing, insignificant was its presence in the public's consciousness. But at pre- directly engaging the island site in a cisely that moment, a shift have taken place that could lead to a may manner unusual for modernist build- new perception and possible re-use of the forgotten parliament, just as mgs. Although plans for Marx- it could engender a new definition of German identity. Engels-Platz never progressed past the stage of parking lot, it has proven to be an excellent outdoor The greatest moment for the Palast der Republik came in August 1990, space for carnivals, performance art, when the first freely-elected representatives of the Volkskammer, a body volleyball matches, attracting large crowds - the kind of public previously subjugated to the central committee, voted for German unifi- entertain- ments so often promoted today in cation.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Unter Den Linden
    BERLIN UNTER DEN LINDEN PIONEERING WORKING LANDSCAPES SITE TOP FEATURES Unter den Linden is one of the most exclusive addresses in the whole of Germany. Our site is situated at the heart of the historical Kaiserhöfe complex. Originally built for Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft AG, the en- semble features an impressive Neoclassical architectural style. Ionian capitals and Tuscan wall pillars are reminiscent of history as well as providing a source of inspiration for the future. The visitor reaches our state-of-the-art working landscape via six separate staircases – as a venue in which to receive partners, customers and guests, it is hard to imagine anything more prestigious. Whether staff are employed on a temporary or long term basis, or you simply maintain a business address here, it is bound to have a highly positive impact on your company's success and reputation. · Work at the number one address in Germany · Coworking, events and conferences in a prestigious setting · A business address of immense renown · Directly adjacent to the country’s most important decision-makers 2 © Lorem Ipsum U Or an ie nb ur ge r S tr. Joh annisstr. Z F e r traß m i rdts A r i a e Reinh k u d s r i c h s t r a ß L e u i s e m n am s rd t ue r Schiff ba a ß e P l a n Dorotheenstraße c LOCATION k s t r Mittelstraße a ß e Straße des 17. Juni U Unter den Linden IN THE BEST COMPANY C h a r l U o t Unter den Linden and the adjacent Friedrichstraße are the lifelines of t nzösische Straße e Fra n s the capital – this is where you feel the pulse of Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel with the Metropolitan Museum of Art
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Travel with Met Classics The Met BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB May 9–15, 2022 Berlin with Christopher Noey Lecturer BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Berlin Dear Members and Friends of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Berlin pulses with creativity and imagination, standing at the forefront of Europe’s art world. Since the fall of the Wall, the German capital’s evolution has been remarkable. Industrial spaces now host an abundance of striking private art galleries, and the city’s landscapes have been redefined by cutting-edge architecture and thought-provoking monuments. I invite you to join me in May 2022 for a five-day, behind-the-scenes immersion into the best Berlin has to offer, from its historic museum collections and lavish Prussian palaces to its elegant opera houses and electrifying contemporary art scene. We will begin with an exploration of the city’s Cold War past, and lunch atop the famous Reichstag. On Museum Island, we
    [Show full text]
  • The History of a Hotel – Reading Comprehension
    The history of a hotel – Reading Comprehension The Hotel Adlon Kempinski Berlin is a luxury hotel in Berlin, Germany. It is located on Unter den Linden, the main boulevard in the central Mitte district, at the corner with Pariser Platz, directly opposite the Brandenburg Gate and the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. The legendary original Hotel Adlon was one of the most famous hotels in Europe. It opened in 1907 and was largely destroyed in 1945 in the closing days of World War II, though a small wing continued operating until 1984. The current hotel, which opened on August 23, 1997, is a new building with a design inspired by the original. In the late 19th century, European hotels, which generally offered no more than overnight accommodation, evolved to become social gathering places which could host large receptions given by nobility and the wealthy. Modeled on American hotels like the Waldorf Astoria, new hotel buildings arose all over the continent with lavishly decorated ballrooms, dining halls, arcades, smoking lounges, libraries, and coffeehouses. In 1873 the Hotel Imperial opened in Vienna, followed by the Hôtel Ritz Paris in 1898, and The Ritz London Hotel in 1906. History in Details In 1905 Lorenz Adlon, a successful wine merchant and restaurateur originally from Mainz, purchased two properties on Unter den Linden. Adlon ran several coffeehouses in Berlin, among others in the Berlin Zoological Garden, and had raised capital to build a hotel on Pariser Platz, at the heart of the German capital. He convinced Kaiser Wilhelm II that Berlin needed a luxury hotel at the level of those in Paris, London and the other European capitals, and so the Kaiser personally cleared the way for Adlon's purchase of the Palais and for the subsequent demolition of the historic building and the constrtuction of the first Adlon Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lange Nacht Der Museen JUNGE WILDE & ALTE MEISTER
    31 AUG 13 | 18—2 UHR Lange Nacht der Museen JUNGE WILDE & ALTE MEISTER Museumsinformation Berlin (030) 24 74 98 88 www.lange-nacht-der- M u s e e n . d e präsentiert von OLD MASTERS & YOUNG REBELS Age has occupied man since the beginning of time Cranach’s »Fountain of Youth«. Many other loca- – even if now, with Europe facing an ageing popula- tions display different expression of youth culture tion and youth unemployment, it is more relevant or young artist’s protests: Mail Art in the Akademie than ever. As far back as antiquity we find unsparing der Künste, street art in the Kreuzberg Museum, depictions of old age alongside ideal figures of breakdance in the Deutsches Historisches Museum young athletes. Painters and sculptors in every and graffiti at Lustgarten. epoch have tackled this theme, demonstrating their The new additions to the Long Night programme – virtuosity in the characterisation of the stages of the Skateboard Museum, the Generation 13 muse- life. In history, each new generation has attempted um and the Ramones Museum, dedicated to the to reform society; on a smaller scale, the conflict New York punk band – especially convey the atti- between young and old has always shaped the fami- tude of a generation. There has also been a genera- ly unit – no differently amongst the ruling classes tion change in our team: Wolf Kühnelt, who came up than the common people. with the idea of the Long Night of Museums and The participating museums have creatively picked who kept it vibrant over many years, has passed on up the Long Night theme – in exhibitions, guided the management of the project.We all want to thank tours, films, talks and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Circling Opera in Berlin by Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College
    Circling Opera in Berlin By Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College, 2001 A.M., Brown University, 2004 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in the Department of Music at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 This dissertation by Paul Martin Chaikin is accepted in its present form by the Department of Music as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_______________ _________________________________ Rose Rosengard Subotnik, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Jeff Todd Titon, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Philip Rosen, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Dana Gooley, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Deutsche Akademische Austauch Dienst (DAAD) for funding my fieldwork in Berlin. I am also grateful to the Institut für Musikwissenschaft und Medienwissenschaft at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin for providing me with an academic affiliation in Germany, and to Prof. Dr. Christian Kaden for sponsoring my research proposal. I am deeply indebted to the Deutsche Staatsoper Unter den Linden for welcoming me into the administrative thicket that sustains operatic culture in Berlin. I am especially grateful to Francis Hüsers, the company’s director of artistic affairs and chief dramaturg, and to Ilse Ungeheuer, the former coordinator of the dramaturgy department. I would also like to thank Ronny Unganz and Sabine Turner for leading me to secret caches of quantitative data. Throughout this entire ordeal, Rose Rosengard Subotnik has been a superlative academic advisor and a thoughtful mentor; my gratitude to her is beyond measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Schlüteriana III
    Schlüteriana III Kevin E. Kandt Schlüteriana III Studies in the Art, Life, and Milieu of Andreas Schlüter (c. 1659 – 1714) Lukas Verlag Cover: Andreas Schlüter and Johann Jacobi. Sarcophagus for King Friedrich I of Prussia – Detail of the Emblematic Figural Group (1713). Berlin Cathedral. I would like to thank my father, Glenn J. Kandt, for his most generous financial assistance during the preparation of this book. Without his steadfast support, it might have never come to fruition. © by Lukas Verlag Erstausgabe, 1. Auflage 2015 Redaktionsschluss: 31. März 2014 Alle Rechte vorbehalten Lukas Verlag für Kunst- und Geistesgeschichte Kollwitzstraße 57 D–10405 Berlin www.lukasverlag.com Umschlag: Verlag Reprographie und Satz: Susanne Werner, Frank Böttcher Druck: Elbe Druckerei Wittenberg Printed in Germany ISBN 978-3-86732-183-9 Table of Contents Forward 7 Quis Evadet? Nemo 15 A Study of the Funerary Monuments by Andreas Schlüter in Poland and Germany Part Two: Germany (1694–1713) I The Berlin Years: A New Beginning in Brandenburg-Prussia 17 II Schlüter, Döbel, or Weyhenmeyer? The Derfflinger Epitaph 31 III A Questionable Schlüter Attribution: The Barfus Epitaph 73 IV Vera Philosophia Mortis est Meditatio: The Männlich Tomb Portal 79 V Excursus: A Commemorative Print for M. D. Marschall von Bieberstein 99 VI Schlüter’s Palace and its Influence 104 VII A Fitting Memorial to a Departed Husband: The Marwitz Epitaph (Groß Rietz) 109 VIII Cunctus Mors Una Manet: The Sarcophagus for Queen Sophie Charlotte 129 IX A Second Tribute to a Deceased Spouse:
    [Show full text]
  • Losing the Palast: the Demolition of Berlin's Most Promising Kunsthalle
    JW-13 GERMANY Jill Winder is a Donors’ Fellow of the Institute studying post-reunification Germany through the ICWA work and attitudes of its artists. LETTERS Losing the Palast: The Demolition of Berlin’s Since 1925 the Institute of Current World Affairs (the Crane- Most Promising Kunsthalle Rogers Foundation) has provided long-term fellowships to enable By Jill Winder outstanding young professionals JANUARY 2006 to live outside the United States BERLIN–People from both sides of the Atlantic often ask me to compare the art and write about international scenes in New York City and Berlin. My answer has not changed in the last five areas and issues. An exempt years. I tell them that New York has an amazing contemporary art infrastructure, operating foundation endowed by with dozens of important galleries, world-class museums, and a bevy of art col- the late Charles R. Crane, the lectors who drive the market. The downside is that a lot of mediocre art (at least of Institute is also supported by the contemporary variety) circulates within this sophisticated system. Berlin has contributions from like-minded the opposite problem: Although there are arguably more talented, internation- individuals and foundations. ally-recognized artists here than in any other location in the world, the art infra- structure is underdeveloped, with uninteresting museums for contemporary art and good galleries struggling because of the lack of art market. Put simply, New York has TRUSTEES a lot of great spaces and a limited number of exceptional artists, while Berlin has a multi- Bryn Barnard tude of first-rate artists who have virtually no place to show their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Here to Expertly Guide You Through the New Normal in Travel
    Our Experience At Exeter International we have been creating memories and crafting custom-designed journeys for 27 years. We are a team of specialists committed to providing the best travel experiences in our destinations. Each of our experts has either travelled extensively on reconnaissance trips, or has lived in their area of expertise, giving us unparalleled first-hand knowledge. Because we focus on specific parts of the globe, we return to the same destinations many times, honing our experience over the years. Knowledgeable Up-to-the-Minute Local Information We are best placed to give you advice about traveling to Europe and beyond; from logistics and new protocols in museums, hotels and restaurants in each country. We are here to expertly guide you through the new normal in travel. Original Custom Programs, Meticulously Planned Our experts speak your language both literally and culturally. Our advice and recommendations are impartial, honest, and always have the individual in mind. We save valuable time in pre-trip research and focus on developing experiences that enrich and enhance your experience. Once on your journey you will have complete peace of mind with our local 24-hour contact person who is on hand to coordinate any changes in your program or help you in the case of any emergency. Hand-Selected Guides We know that guides are one of the most important components of any travel experience. That is why we only use local experts who have a history of working with our guests and whom we know personally. We are extremely particular in selecting our guides and are confident that they will be one of the most memorable aspects of any of our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographer Frank Theil on Today's Berlin
    Thaddeus-Johns, Josie. “Photographer Frank Theil On Today’s Berlin: ‘No Boundaries Between People’.” Culture Trip. September 25, 2019. Photographer Frank Thiel continues to document the transformation of Berlin following the fall of the Wall | (c) Antony Sojka-Metcalfe / Culture Trip Photographer Frank Thiel has made a career out of keeping his lens fixed on the constant transformation of Berlin, a city still dealing with the trauma of being cleaved in two. Much has changed, much has been lost, and much has been created, but the German capital still marches to its own beat, led by some of the world’s most forward-thinking creatives. A castle is being reconstructed right in the centre of Berlin. The Humboldt Forum at Schloßplatz will combine two of the city’s biggest museum collections and will open in phases over the next two years. The first version of the Berlin Palace (Stadtschloss) came down in 1950, demolished by the German Democratic Republic to make room for its parliament building, the Palast der Republik, which then suffered a similar fate in 2008. Boxhagener Straße is lined with a number of shops and restaurants © Tony Sojka / Culture Trip The current architectural development is of particular interest to artist Frank Thiel, who photographed the Palast der Republik just before demolition began, in 2003, as part of a series of untitled works about the changing architecture of Berlin after the Wall fell. These images often single out the endless interlocking triangles of a building’s rafters, or the vast floors of a desolate building, producing a moment of tense stillness.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Incoherent Renovation in Berlin: Is There a Way
    New Design Ideas Vol.3, No.1, 2019, pp.60-78 INCOHERENT RENOVATION IN BERLIN: IS THERE A WAY FORWARD? Malcolm Millais Independent researcher, Porto, Portugal Abstract. This paper briefly describes the fates of four of Berlin‟s most iconic cultural buildings. These are the Berlin Palace, the Neues Museum, the Berlin Dom (Cathedral) and the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church. Using a variety of historical styles, all these buildings were built, or finished, in the nineteenth century, and all suffered serious damage due to aerial bombing in the Second World War. As all were repairable, the obvious choice might seem to reinstate them to their original condition: but this did not happen to any of them. This paper examines the incoherence of the various renovations, and briefly addresses the problem of formulating a coherent approach to renovation, particularly with reference to the 1964 Venice Charter. Keywords: Berlin, renovation, Venice Charter, iconic buildings, war damage, monstrous carbuncle, wartime bombing, cultural destruction. Corresponding Author: Malcolm Millais, Porto, Portugal, e-mail: [email protected] Received: 4 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 28 June 2019. 1. Introduction What can be said about all four of the buildings examined here is that: All, except in some aspects the Neues Museum, were extremely solidly built, so, given routine maintenance, could have be expected to have lasted for probably hundreds of years. All were severely damaged by aerial bombing during the Second World War. All were repairable. All suffered further destruction due to various political ideologies such as Communism, Modernism and Nationalism. All have been reinstated in a variety of ways, none of which are universally accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Prague Vienna 2021 Finalv2
    Women’s Travel Group Spring in Berlin, Dresden & Prague Post Tour: Vienna Day 1/Wed - May 26 Berlin (Dinner) Welcome to Germany! We will be met at the airport and privately trans- ferred to our hotel. Enjoy a welcome dinner in the compa- ny of our local guide (wine/water included). Overnight Berlin. 25hours Bikini**** or similar The historic Bikini Complex includes the 25hours Hotel Bilkin Berlin with a direct view of the zoological garden and the landmark of West Berlin to the south. The reception area has a lounge and in-house bakery. Guest rooms have views of the Gedachtniskirche —the Berlin creative scene. The rooms, the jungle sauna, NENI Berlin restaurant on the roof and monkey bar, with spectacu- lar roof terrace, thrive on the view of Berlin’s green city oasis. Day 2 /Thu - May 27 Berlin (Breakfast Lunch) (9 am–4 pm)Today we have a pri- vate introduction to Germany’s most multifaceted city. Berlin was once the resi- dence of the Hohenzollern, capital of the German Empire and of German Democratic Republic (DDR), Weimar Republic and the Third Reich. Following the end of the dic- tatorship of terror, the old Nazi center of power was occupied by Allied Forces and divided into 4 zones. Nowhere in the world are the consequences of the politics of the Cold War as clearly visible as in Berlin. From 1961 to 1989, the East and West were divided by a wall. After the fall of the wall and the reunification Germany, Berlin became the capital again. On this first day we visit the government district with Parliament and Chancellery.
    [Show full text]