Efficacy of Organic and Synthetic Insecticides on the Control of Cotton Pests: the Bollworm Complex, Helicoverpa Armigera, Dipar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Efficacy of Organic and Synthetic Insecticides on the Control of Cotton Pests: the Bollworm Complex, Helicoverpa Armigera, Dipar Efficacy of organic and synthetic insecticides on the control of cotton pests: The bollworm complex, Helicoverpa armigera, Diparopsis castanea, Earias insulana (Noctuidae) and the leafhopper, Jacobiella fascialis (Cicadellidae), for small-scale farmers By Lawrence Nkosikhona Malinga A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Entomology) Faculty of Science and Agriculture Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Fort Hare Alice 5700 Supervisor: Prof. Samuel Waladde Co-supervisors: Dr Emmanuel Do Linh San Mr Eugen Eulitz August 2012 i DECLARATION This is to declare that this thesis entitled “Efficacy of organic and synthetic insecticides on the control of cotton pests: The bollworm complex, Helicoverpa armigera, Diparopsis castanea, Earias insulana (Noctuidae) and the leafhopper, Jacobiella fascialis (Cicadellidae), for small-scale farmers” is my own work and has not been previously submitted to any institute. I know that plagiarism means taking and using the ideas, writings, works or inventions of another as if they were ones own. I know that plagiarism not only includes verbatim copying, but also extensive use of another person’s ideas without proper acknowledgment (which sometimes includes the use of quotation marks). I know that plagiarism covers this sort of use of material found in textual sources (e.g. books, journal articles and scientific reports) and from the Internet. I acknowledge and understand that plagiarism is wrong. I understand that my research must be accurately referenced. I have followed the academic rules and conventions concerning referencing, citation and the use of quotations. I have not allowed, nor will I in the future allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as their own work. Signature of author: .......................................... Date: ....................................... Signature of supervisor: ................................... Date: ....................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere gratitude goes to my supervisor Prof. Samuel Waladde for his tireless efforts, valuable criticism and support during the writing of this work. I also would like to thank my first co-supervisor, Mr. Eugen Eulitz, for his teaching and guidance during the practical work. My thanks also go to my second co-supervisor, Dr. Emmanuel Do Linh San, for being there for me in such a short notice. I want to thank Dr. Graham Thompson, Dr. Gerrit Prinsloo and Ms. Jennie van Biljon for their constant support. I also would like to thank the staff at ARC Biometry Unit for their assistance with the analysis of the data, as well as Prof. Johnnie Van Den Berg for his precious advice regarding the use of economic threshold levels. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my dearest wife Thobile Lorraine, my handsome son Unathi Stanley (Minime) and my lovely daughter Nomathemba Laurencia for their undying love, support and patience throughout the years. iii ABSTRACT A research was conducted on cotton to test different plant extracts with potential insecticidal properties against bollworms (Noctuidae) and leafhoppers (Cicadellidae) for the use by small-scale, cotton farmers. The study was carried out during the 2006/07 and 2007/08 seasons at ARC Institute for Industrial Crops, Rustenburg (25°39.0 S, 27°14.4 E) in the North West Province of South Africa. Four organic insecticides, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacium), khaki weed (Tagetes minuta), thorn apple (Datura stramonium) and garlic (Allium sativum) were compared with two chemical treatments, Mospilan® (acetamiprid) and Decis® (deltamethrin), and an untreated control. The cultivar, DeltaOPAL, was planted and the trial conducted using standard practices. Overall, Decis® and tobacco treatments exhibited significantly less bollworm larvae than the other treatments. Tobacco was the most promising biological pesticide against American bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and spiny bollworm (Earias insulana) larvae. All the treatments were significantly effective against the red bollworm (Diparopsis castanea) larvae, but Decis® and Mospilan® provided the best control. Although khaki weed, garlic and thorn apple were promising biological pesticides against the bollworm complex, tobacco was the most effective organic treatment. Mospilan® seemed to be more effective on the control of leafhoppers (Jacobiella fascialis), followed by Decis® and tobacco. Among the plant extracts, tobacco and garlic gave higher seed cotton yields compared to the khaki weed and thorn apple during both study seasons. In 2006/07, none of the treatments reached the corresponding economic threshold levels (ETLs). In contrast, in 2007/08, only rarely were the treatments (mostly Decis® and Mospilan®) below the corresponding ETLs. These differences were attributed to the higher rainfall recorded during the 2007/08 season, which reduced the effectiveness of the treatments by partly washing away the pesticidal applications. In addition, a high weed infestation also created competition for nutrients in the soil, thus resulting in lower (0.50-1.25 ton/ha in 2007/08 vs 2.50-5.00 ton/ha in 2006/07), but acceptable cotton seed yields. In conclusion, it is suggested that some plant extracts (particularly from tobacco and garlic) can be used as a cheaper and more environment-friendly alternative to chemical insecticides for the control of bollworms and leafhoppers, although it has been demonstrated that their efficacy do not reach the one of chemical treatments. Further research in the near future is recommended. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... ii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................ 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 American bollworm ..................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Crop damage and economic importance ...................................... 5 2.2 Red bollworm .............................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 Crop damage and economic importance ...................................... 6 2.3 Spiny bollworm ........................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 Crop damage and economic importance ...................................... 9 2.4 Management of the bollworm complex ..................................................... 10 2.4.1 Chemical control ......................................................................... 11 2.4.1.1 Synthetic chemical insecticides ..................................... 11 2.4.1.2 Botanical pesticides ...................................................... 11 2.4.2 Biological control ......................................................................... 12 2.4.2.1 Parasitoids .................................................................... 12 2.4.2.2 Predators ....................................................................... 14 Predatory bug ............................................................... 14 Spiders ......................................................................... 15 Lacewings .................................................................... 15 v 2.4.2.3 Pathogens and biopesticides ........................................ 16 2.4.2.4 Bt cotton ........................................................................ 16 2.4.3 Cultural control ............................................................................ 18 2.4.3.1 Pheromones and traps .................................................. 18 2.4.3.2 Agronomic techniques ................................................... 19 2.4.3.3 Crop rotation ................................................................. 19 2.4.3.4 Scouting ........................................................................ 20 2.4.3.5 Intercropping ................................................................. 20 2.5 Leafhoppers (Jassids) .............................................................................. 21 2.5.1 Life cycle ..................................................................................... 22 2.5.2 Crop damage and economic importance .................................... 22 2.5.3 Control and management of leafhoppers .................................... 23 2.5.3.1 Chemical control ........................................................... 23 2.5.3.2 Biological control ........................................................... 25 2.5.3.3 Cultural control .............................................................. 26 2.6 Locally available plants with pesticidal potential
Recommended publications
  • Opportunities and Challenges Faced with Emerging Technologies in the Australian Vegetable Industry
    HAL Project Title: Opportunities and challenges faced with emerging technologies in the Australian vegetable industry. (Technology Platform 5: Emerging Technologies for Production and Harvest) Project VG08087 Project completion date: 30/06/2010 Author: Dr Silvia Estrada-Flores VG08087 Emerging Technologies: Production Opportunities and challenges faced with emerging technologies in the Australian vegetable industry. (Technology Platform 5: Emerging Technologies for Production and Harvest) Horticulture Australia Project Number: VG08087 Project Leader: Dr Silvia Estrada-Flores. Principal Consultant, Food Chain Intelligence. Contact details: PO Box 1789. North Sydney 2059, NSW. Ph 0404 353 571; e-mail: [email protected] &RPSDQ\¶VZebsite: www.food-chain.com.au Delivered on: June 2010. Purpose of Project: This report was prepared as an outcome of Milestone 190 RISURMHFW9*´2SSRUWXQLWLHVDQG challenJHVIDFHGZLWKHPHUJLQJWHFKQRORJLHVLQWKH$XVWUDOLDQYHJHWDEOHLQGXVWU\´7KHSURMHFW aims to provide a broad review of technologies that are influencing the competitiveness of the industry. This is the fourth of five reports to be developed during 2009-2010 and reviews novel production and harvesting technologies for vegetables. Funding acknowledgements: Food Chain Intelligence acknowledges the financial support for this project from Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) and AUSVEG. Disclaimers: Any recommendations contained in this publication do not necessarily represent current HAL policy. No person should act on the basis of the contents of this publication,
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Earias Insulana – Interception –
    Express PRA for Earias insulana – Interception – Prepared by: Julius Kuehn-Institute, Institute for National and International Plant Health; Dr. Anne Wilstermann on: 31-08-2018. (translated by Elke Vogt-Arndt) Initiation: Interception of Okra fruits from Egypt by the Plant Protection Service of the Federal State Brandenburg Express-PRA Earias insulana Phytosanitary risk for Germany high medium low Phytosanitary risk for high medium low EU-Member States Certainty of assessment high medium low Conclusion The Egyptian bollworm Earias insulana is endemic in Africa and the Mediterranean region and does not occur in Germany. It is, however already established in Armenia, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Sicily, Spain, the Balearic and the Canary Islands. So far, it is listed neither in the Annexes of the Directive 2000/29/EC nor by EPPO. E. insulana infests mallow plants, considerable damage mainly is known on Gossypium hirsutum and Abelmoschus esculentus. Due to unsuitable climatic conditions, the pest is not able to establish outdoors in Germany. An establishment in protected cultivation with permanent host availability is assumed. An establishment in Southern European Member States has already taken place. The species will distribute naturally under suitable climatic conditions and with suitable host plants. Due to its low damage potential, the unsuitable climatic conditions and the low host plant availability E. insulana does not present any risk for Germany. The species did already establish in EU-Member States with suitable climate. Thus, Earias insulana is not classified as a quarantine pest and § 4a of the Plant Inspection Order does not apply. Preconditions for an Express- Could be a pest, is not listed and so far, did not establish in PRA fulfilled? the area covered by the reporting Plant Protection Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Ent18 2 117 121 (Kravchenko Et Al).Pmd
    Russian Entomol. J. 18(2): 117121 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2009 The Eariadinae and Chloephorinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea, Nolidae) of Israel: distribution, phenology and ecology Eariadinae è Chloephorinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea, Nolidae) Èçðàèëÿ: ðàñïðåäåëåíèå, ôåíîëîãèÿ è ýêîëîãèÿ V.D. Kravchenko1, Th. Witt2, W. Speidel2, J. Mooser3, A. Junnila4 & G.C. Müller4 Â.Ä. Êðàâ÷åíêî1,Ò. Âèòò2, Â. Øïàéäåëü2, Äæ. Ìîçåð3, Ý. Äæàííèëà4 , Ã.Ê. Ìþëëåð4 1 Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2 Museum Witt, Tengstr. 33, D-80796 Munich, Germany. 3 Seilerbruecklstr. 23, D-85354 Freising, Germany. 4 Department of Parasitology, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Hebrew University Hadassah- Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Israel, Levant, Nolidae, Eariadinae, Chloephorinae, phenology, ecology, host- plants. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Lepidoptera, Èçðàèëü, Ëåâàíò, Nolidae, Eariadinae, Chloephorinae, ôåíîëîãèÿ, ýêîëîãèÿ, êîðìîâûå ðàñòåíèÿ. ABSTRACT: The distribution, flight period and âèä, Microxestis wutzdorffi (Püngeler, 1907), ñîáðàííûé abundance of six Israeli Eariadinae and eight Chloe- 80 ëåò íàçàä, íå îáíàðóæåí çà âðåìÿ ðàáîòû phorinae species (Noctuoidea, Nolidae) are summa- Èçðàèëüñêî-Ãåðìàíñêîãî Ïðîåêòà ïî èçó÷åíèþ Lepi- rized. Seven species are new records for Israel: Earias doptera. Äëÿ âñåõ âèäîâ ïðèâîäÿòñÿ äàííûå ïî biplaga Walker, 1866, Earias cupreoviridis (Walker, ÷èñëåííîñòè, ðàñïðåäåëåíèþ, ôåíîëîãèè è ýêîëîãèè. 1862), Acryophora dentula (Lederer, 1870), Bryophilop- Äëÿ ïÿòè âèäîâ âïåðâûå óêàçàíû êîðìîâûå ðàñòåíèÿ. sis roederi (Standfuss, 1892), Nycteola revayana (Sco- poli, 1772), Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925) and Nycteola asiatica (Krulikovsky, 1904). Three species, Introduction E. biplaga E. cupreoviridis and N. revayana, are re- corded for the first time from the Levante. Only one The Nolidae is a family that has changed in its species, Microxestis wutzdorffi (Püngeler, 1907), col- coverage several times during the past.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Pest Management in Organic Cacao
    20 Pest Management in Organic Cacao Régis Babin* International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya Introduction Americas produced around 14% of total world production of cocoa (FAOSTAT, 2014). General information on cacao Cacao crop expansion in Africa and Asia came with the emergence of major pests Cacao, Theobroma cacao, is a small tree and diseases, which have adapted to the from the family Malvaceae, and originated crop from their local host plants. The most in different forest areas of South and Central infamous examples are the cocoa mirids America (Wood, 1985). During the 20th cen- Sahlbergella singularis Hagl. and Distantiel- tury, the cacao-growing belt spread consid- la theobroma Dist. (Hemiptera: Miridae), and erably over tropical areas of America, Africa the black pod disease due to Phytophthora and Asia, and is around 10 million ha today palmivora Butler and Phytophthora mega- (FAOSTAT, 2014). Cocoa beans are pro- karya, which became major threats for West duced for butter and powder that are used African-producing countries in the 1960s mainly in chocolate manufacture. In 2014, and 1970s, respectively (Entwistle, 1985; chocolate confectionery produced revenues Lass, 1985). In Latin America, witches’ of around US$120 bn, and these are ex- broom disease due to the basidiomycete fun- pected to grow with the developing markets gus Moniliophthora perniciosa highly im- in countries with rising middle classes pacted production of cocoa in Brazil in the (Hawkins and Chen, 2014). At the same time, 1990s (Meinhardt et al., 2008), while the cocoa world production rose constantly for frosty pod rot, due to Moniliophthora roreri, decades and reached 5 million t in 2012 that is widely spread in Latin America, cur- (FAOSTAT, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • New Subdivision of Cotton Production Area of Côte D'ivoire Based on The
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2021; 9(3): 50-57 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 New subdivision of cotton production area of Côte www.entomoljournal.com JEZS 2021; 9(3): 50-57 d’Ivoire based on the infestation of main © 2021 JEZS Received: 25-03-2021 arthropod pests Accepted: 27-04-2021 Kouakou Malanno National Center for Agronomic Kouakou Malanno, Bini Kouadio Kra Norbert, Ouattara Bala Mamadou Research, Cotton Research and Ochou Ochou Germain Station of Bouake, Entomology Laboratory, 01 BP 633 Bouaké 01, Côte d’Ivoire DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2021.v9.i3a.8689 Bini Kouadio Kra Norbert Abstract National Center for Agronomic Variations in populations of arthropod pests, under the influence of climate change, compromise the Research, Cotton Research effectiveness of the cotton phytosanitary protection strategy in Côte d'Ivoire. This study aims to establish Station of Bouake, Entomology a new classification of cotton production areas, on the basis of predominant pests. A monitoring was Laboratory, 01 BP 633 Bouaké therefore carried out from 2016 to 2019 in 400 farmers' fields. In these fields, surveys were conducted 01, Côte d’Ivoire weekly, from the 30th to the 122nd day after emergence. Data analysis, through Principal Component Analysis, identified four groups of localities. The first group includes the northeastern localities (4°W to Ouattara Bala Mamadou Department of Physical 5°W: 8°N to 10.5°N) such as Kong, Ouangolodougou, Sordi, Tiékpè, Kaouara. This area is characterized Geography, University Alassane by high infestations of most pests (jassid, white flies, exocarpic lepidoptera, endocarpic lepidoptera, Ouattara, Côte d'Ivoire phyllophagous lepidoptera and mites).
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Knowledge and Perception of Cocoa Insect Pests and Damage
    Journal of Plant Protection Research ISSN 1427-4345 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Farmers’ knowledge and perception of cocoa insect pests and damage and the implications for pest management on cocoa in Ghana Godfred Kweku Awudzi1*, Richard Adu-Acheampong1, Silas Wintuma Avicor1, Yahaya Bukari2, Millicent Adomaa Yeboah3, Edmond Kwadwo Oti Boateng4, Stephen Kwame Ahadzi1 1 Entomology, Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG), Ghana 2 Plant Pathology, Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG), Ghana 3 Extension, Cocoa Health and Extension Division (CHED), Ghana 4 Social Science and Statistics Unit (SSU), Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG), Ghana Vol. 61, No. 2: 145–155, 2021 Abstract DOI: 10.24425/jppr.2021.137022 Annual losses of cocoa in Ghana to insect pests are significant. The use of integrated pest management (IPM) tools is critical for effective pest management. Previous studies on Received: November 13, 2020 the subject have considered how farmers perceive the economic impact of insect pests on Accepted: December 23, 2020 cocoa. These studies however did not investigate farmers’ ability to identify pests, associ- ated damage symptoms and their implications for pest management. The current study, *Corresponding address: therefore, assessed farmers’ ability to correctly associate insect damage with the pest [email protected] species that caused it. A total of 600 farmers were interviewed in the Eastern, Ashanti, Western, Brong Ahafo and Central Regions of Ghana with a structured open and closed- ended questionnaire. Most farmers (>85%) were unable to correctly identify and associ- ate pests to their damage. The majority (>80%) of farmers also could not link the imma- ture stages of insect pests to their adult stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Optomotor Regulation of Ground Velocity in Moths During Flight to Sex Pheromone at Different Heights
    Physzologzcal Entomology (1982) 7,193-202 Optomotor regulation of ground velocity in moths during flight to sex pheromone at different heights L P S KUENEN and T. C BAKER Division of Toxicology and Physiology, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, U.S A ABSTRACT Males of two species of moths (Grapholitha molesta (Busck) and Hehothis virescens (F )) were flown in a sustained-flight tunnel in horizontal pheromone plumes The up-tunnel velocity of the moths increased with increasing height of flight and for G molesta was independent of tunnel wind velocities Use of moving ground patterns verified that the height of flight above the ground was the factor related to the changes in up-tunnel velocity. Even though up-tunnel velocity increased with incieased flight height, angular velocity of image motion did not. Males appeared to use visual cues from the ground pattern and from other sources to determine their up-tunnel velocities The relationship of preferred retinal velocities to optomotoi anemotaxis is discussed Key words. Wind tunnel, optomotor control, flight control, ground velocity, pheromone, flight height, retinal velocity, Graphohtha molesta, Hehothis virescens Introduction constant or 'preferred' retinal velocity the insect should exhibit changes in net ground Various aspects of the control of insect flight velocity (Fig 1) as it changes height above the behaviour have been examined, including the surf ace (Kennedy, 195 1) The independence use of vision by the insect to maintain a of ground velocity from changes
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Bt Proteins and the Effect of Temperature on the Development of Spiny Bollworm in South Africa
    Efficacy of Bt proteins and the effect of temperature on the development of spiny bollworm in South Africa D Fourie 20670591 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in Environmental Sciences at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof MJ du Plessis Co-supervisor: Prof J van den Berg May 2016 Acknowledgement I would like to thank the Lord above for giving me the strength to finish this project, the love and passion I have for nature and the opportunity to do something I feel passionate about. Thank you Lord for the ability to study, and all the opportunities You send my way. With Your grace, anything is possible. I would like to thank my supervisor prof. Hannalene du Plessis for all her support, inspiration and guidance during this project, but particularly for her assistance in the statistical analysis. I learned a lot and appreciate all the time and effort we spent to finish this project. I would also like to thank my co-supervisor prof. Johnnie van den Berg for the support to finish this project and his assistance and time during the writing of this dissertation, I appreciate it a lot. I would like to thank all my friends for their help, support and encouragement during the time of this project. I am truly grateful for your help during field work and your assistance in the laboratory. A special thanks to Phillip Mphuthi for all his help in collecting Earias spp. moths. I appreciate all your help during the late hours and your hospitality during my stay in Rustenburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysdercus Cingulatus
    Prelims (F) Page i Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1998 Prelims (F) Page ii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World ©Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601. Waterhouse, D.F. 1998, Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects. ACIAR Monograph No. 51, 548 pp + viii, 1 fig. 16 maps. ISBN 1 86320 221 8 Design and layout by Arawang Communication Group, Canberra Cover: Nezara viridula adult, egg rafts and hatching nymphs. Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne ii Prelims (F) Page iii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Contents Foreword vii 1 Abstract 1 2 Estimation of biological control
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Certain Insect Pests Attacking Cotton Plants in Sohag Governorate
    201 Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 3(2): 201-207, 2014 ISSN 2077-4605 Biological Control of Certain Insect Pests Attacking Cotton Plants in Sohag Governorate 1Salman, A.M.A., 2Karaman, G.A., 3El-Zoghbey, A.A. and 3Mazeed, A.R.A. 1Plant Protection Dept., Fac. of Agric., Sohag Univ. 2Plant Protection Dept., Fac. of Agric., Minia Univ. 3Biological Control Dept., Plant Protection Institute, ARC. ABSTRACT The present investigations were carried out to study the efficiency of releasing the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma evanescens (West.) only or with Chrysoperla carnea Stephens., Coccinella undecimpunctata L. and Coccinella septempunctata L. against the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.), and the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.), Also the effect on cotton yield was determined. Data revealed that all biological control treatments decreased significantly the population of both pink and spiny bollworms, All treatments induced significant increase in cotton yield compared with the untreated check. Also, numbers of diapausing larvae were significantly reduced by all treatments in both years. and investigations the efficiency of releasing Ch. carnea, C. undecimpunctata and C. septempunctata against the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in cotton fields during 2010 and 2011 seasons, cotton aphid in treated plots compared with the untreated check. Key words: Biological control, Pectinophora gossypiella, Earias insulana, Aphis gossypii, cotton. Introduction Cotton, Gossypium barbadence L. is one of the most important economical crops in Egypt and all over the world where it is employed in several industrial productions i.e. ginning, textile, Food oil, soap, furniture and many other industries, as well as a source of foreign coin when exported to another countries, (Al-Shannaf, 2010).
    [Show full text]