8Th Norfolks on the Somme, 1St July 1916

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8Th Norfolks on the Somme, 1St July 1916 8th Norfolks on the Somme, 1 st July 1916 Introduction 8th Norfolks, a ‘Kitchener battalion’ raised in September 1914, was one of the attacking battalions on the 1 st July. Their starting position was on the southern part of the British front line, north of the village of Carnoy. As part of 18 th (Eastern) Division, under the experienced and enlightened General Maxse, the battalion was well trained and properly prepared, but had not previously been involved in a major attack. My grandfather, Sergeant Sid Dace, served with the battalion and was there on 1 st July but his role is not known. He may have been one of the bombers referred to below. Contemporary documents [From 53rd Brigade War Diary – WO 95/2034] “Attack of the 8 th Norfolk Regiment At 7:27 a.m. the leading Coys . ('C' Coy. on the right and 'B' Coy. on the left) went over the parapet and formed up for the assault in front of our trenches. No difficulty was experienced during the forming up, practically all our wire having been removed and, the enemy's barrage was not heavy, most of the fire being directed on our 3 rd . and 4 th Assembly trenches. At 7:30 a.m. the leading wave moved forward to the assault; very little opposition was encountered in MINE Trench and MINE Support; the enemy’s wire had been almost completely destroyed and offered no obstacle and his trenches were almost obliterated in places. The first serious resistance was encountered at THE CASTLE, this was overcome about 7:53 a.m. and the leading Coys. pushed on. A good number of prisoners of the 109 th Inf. Regt. were captured here by the right platoon of the 3 rd Coy. (‘B’ Coy). After leaving THE CASTLE, the right of the right Coy. was held up at the junction of MINE ALLEY and BRESLAU SUPPORT, the remainder of this Coy. and the left Coy. pushed on to the POMMIERS line which was reached shortly after 8:15 a.m. Captain Hall commanding the Left Coy. was badly wounded just after leaving BUND SUPPORT and 2 nd Lieut. Attenborough assumed command of the Coy. The right of the right Coy. came under heavy machine gun fire from the gun in MINE ALLEY and machine gun and rifle fire from the junction of BACK and BOCHE trenches where the enemy had a strong point. 2 bombing parties under Sergt. WEST were sent forward and a Stokes gun was brought up; there was considerable delay in getting the gun into action owing to some of the party carrying ammunition having been hit. During the next few hours the progress of the right was very slow, and it was not till nearly 2 p.m. that resistance in this quarter was finally overcome [and] the capture of this strong point and BACK Trench was accomplished by bombing parties under 2 nd Lieut. GUNDRY- WHITE and 2 nd Lieut. MIALL-SMITH working up BRESLAU ALLEY and MINE ALLEY, and assisted by the fire of Stokes guns from MINE ALLEY and THE LOOP. 2 officers and about 150 men were made prisoners. In the meantime THE LOOP had been captured at about 10:20 a.m. together with about 60 prisoners. The loss in Officers was severe and at this period there was only 1 Officer with the detached portion of the Right Coy. and 1 Officer (who was slightly wounded) with the left. At this period Capt. MORGAN re-inforced the leading Cos. with 2 platoons of his Support Coy. (‘B’ Coy.) and 1 took command of the line. About 11:00 a.m. the Right Coy. moved forward to BLIND ALLEY and the Left Coy. began working up LOOP Trench and eventually got [in] touch with the R. BERKS REGT who were working up this trench. At this time considerable trouble was caused by fire from the still uncaptured strong point to the right rear. Little progress was made until the LOOP Trench was finally cleared by the BERKS about 5:40 p.m. when the advanced line moved forward to MONTAUBAN ALLEY. About 4:00 p.m. an attack was made to push across the MONTAUBAN – MAMETZ Road, but this was prevented by heavy machine gun fire. 2 nd Lieut. Attenborough and C.S.M.1 Coe both being killed during the attempt. On reaching MONTAUBAN ALLEY the Coys. were re-organised and a strong bombing party was sent forward to clear CATERPILLAR Trench where practically no resistance was met. This trench was double blocked at about Pt. S.26.a.9.6. The Reserve Coy. under Capt. ASHDOWN now moved forward and about 8:00 p.m. occupied an advanced line in front of MONTAUBAN ALLEY on the line of EAST Trench - Pt. S.26.b.46.40 - Pt. S.26.a.9.6. By 10:00 p.m. the work of consolidation was well advanced.” [From 8 th Norfolks War Diary – WO 95/2040] “War Diary – JULY 1916 Assembly Trenches 1 st The Battal ion took part in an assault on the German trenches North or CARNOY, and S.W. of MONTAUBAN. The 7 th Battalion The Queens Royal West Surrey Regiment of the 55 th Brigade were on our Right and the 6 th Battalion Royal Berkshire Regiment, of our own Brigade, were on our left. For details of Operation Orders giving Administrative arrangements issued prior to 1 st July, see Appendix 1 (Attached). In the early hours of the morning the Battalion was in position in the four assembly trenches, i.e., in their battle position ready for attack. The early hours of the morning were passed in comparative quietude. 5:30 am. Teas were brought up from CARNOY and served out in the Assemb ly trenches. 7.20 am. Our artillery commenced the intense bombardment and the enemy’s retaliation on our Fourth line assembly trench became more apparent. 7.27 am. A mine and two Russian Saps were exploded on our front. 7.27 am. The first wave of our “C” and “ D” Companies deployed from our firing line and laid out in the open about 30 yards in front. This movement was accomplished without loss. 7.30 am. The assault commenced. The remainder of our two assaulting companies left our trenches and moved forward in four successive waves. 1 Recte R.S.M 2 MINE TRENCH was reached and crossed by these two Companies with practically no opposition and without loss on our side. All Germans remaining alive in this trench after our artillery barrage had passed were thoroughly cowed and at once surrendered. “C” Company on our right took about 30 prisoners from the West Edge of the mine craters. MINE SUPPORT was taken about 7.40 am. The wire entanglements in front having been completely demolished by our artillery. Up to this point, the Battalion suffered very few casualties. BUND SUPPORT was reached and taken at 8 a.m, where in accordance with previous arrangements 2 a halt was made. The two assaulting companies on leaving BUND SUPPORT came under heavy enfilade machine gun fire from the direction of BRESLAU SUPPORT and BACK TRENCH and suffered heavily. Captain B.P Ayre being killed and Captain J H Hall being seriously wounded. By this time the following officers had been wounded. Capt & Adjt H.P. Berney-Ficklin, 2 nd Lieuts. J.G. Hampson, C.T. Blackborn, L. Padfield, S.A. Wharton, G.R. Ironmonger and E. Maclean, (at duty). There now remained no officer with the left leading company and two subalterns in the right leading company, which were now reduced to 90 and 100 men respectively. The Left Leading Company under C.S.M. A.F. Raven reached our first objective - POMMIERS TRENCH - and took it at about 10.30 am. A portion of the Right Leading Company also got into POMMIERS TRENCH near the East Side of THE LOOP at the same time, but the remainder of this company was held up by machine gun fire and a strong point at the junction of BOCHE TRENCH and BACK TRENCH with MINE ALLEY. After this company had been reinforced by a platoon from the support company under 2nd Lieut G. E. Miall-Smith and the Battalions Bombers under Sergeant H E West had also been sent up to this point, this strongpoint fell and the garrison of about 150 Germans and 2 Officers of a Bavarian Regiment surrendered, and right leading company was then able to push forward into the East portion of POMMIERS TRENCH which up to then had not been taken. At this point in the attack, “A” company which had been in reserve and had advanced from the assembly trenches in artillery formation at 7.45am, and had been consolidating MINE SUPPORT, now advanced to BUND SUPPORT and commenced the consolidation of this trench. At the same “B”, the support company, advanced with three platoons, (1 already having been sent to reinforce “C”), to POMMIERS TRENCH. 3 pm. “B” Company had now taken THE LOOP and both assaulting companies advanced to the MONTAUBAN ALLEY line, - the final objective of the Battalion. Owing to machine gun firing from the line and from N.W of MONTAUBAN, “D” company on the left suffered heavy casualties, and “C” company, led by 2nd Lieut J H Attenborough made repeated attempts to get into MONTAUBAN ALLEY but did not succeed until a bombing party under 2 nd Lieut. L.A Gundry-White gained an entrance by way of LOOP TRENCH on the left.
Recommended publications
  • The Munster Fusiliers in France 1914-1918
    ,doned at the ime to OND MUNSTERS orders. ,ress of tics of n' was deput- mental asonic Le anti- 1s their he Royal Munster Army entered the town, they encount- :aders, Fusiliers were formed ered on the road a body of troops who ormer from the amalgamation of wore French uniforms and whose officer ster, in the 10lst and the 104th spoke in French. Suddenly, these troops, igious Foot Regiments, Bengal The Germans attacked on the 'without the slightest warning, lowered ligious Fusiliers. These two regiments became morning of Sunday, 23rd. As the battle their bayonets and charged'. They were ~g the the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the Royal raged all that day around the coal fields German soldiers and, like the 1st Army, ism of Munster Fusiliers, under an order passed of Mons, the Munsters somehow escaped were also scheduled to billet that night at I prove in July, 1881. Although the regimental the German onslaught. About 5 p.m. the Landrecies. General Haig, thinking he by the headquarters were in Tralee, many of the French 5th Army, which was to the right was under heavy attack, telephoned the lasonic fusiliers and their officers were of the fusiliers, began to give way and headquarters to send help. Assuming the Limerickmen. retreat. Due to a lack of communication worst, GHQ sent orders altering Haig's French After spending their first 33 years on between the French and the British, Sir line of retreat for the next day. his move 'S anti- tours of duty through much of the British John French, the British commander, did was to split the force in two, the result anuary, Empire, the Munsters were stationed at not receive news of the retreat until I1 being that the 1st and 2nd armies lost isit to Aldershot when the German invasion of p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • CDN Battle of Vimy Ridge.Pdf
    Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 1 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 2 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 3 BRERETON GREENHOUS STEPHEN J. HARRIS Canada and the BATTLE OF VIMY RIDGE 9-12 April 1917 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 4 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Greenhous, Brereton, 1929- Stephen J. Harris, 1948- Canada and the Battle of Vimy Ridge, 9-12 April 1917 Issued also in French under title: Le Canada et la Bataille de Vimy 9-12 avril 1917. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-660-16883-9 DSS cat. no. D2-90/1992E-1 2nd ed. 2007 1.Vimy Ridge, Battle of, 1917. 2.World War, 1914-1918 — Campaigns — France. 3. Canada. Canadian Army — History — World War, 1914-1918. 4.World War, 1914-1918 — Canada. I. Harris, Stephen John. II. Canada. Dept. of National Defence. Directorate of History. III. Title. IV.Title: Canada and the Battle of Vimy Ridge, 9-12 April 1917. D545.V5G73 1997 940.4’31 C97-980068-4 Cet ouvrage a été publié simultanément en français sous le titre de : Le Canada et la Bataille de Vimy, 9-12 avril 1917 ISBN 0-660-93654-2 Project Coordinator: Serge Bernier Reproduced by Directorate of History and Heritage, National Defence Headquarters Jacket: Drawing by Stéphane Geoffrion from a painting by Kenneth Forbes, 1892-1980 Canadian Artillery in Action Original Design and Production Art Global 384 Laurier Ave.West Montréal, Québec Canada H2V 2K7 Printed and bound in Canada All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Front the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Westernthe Front
    Ed 2 June 2015 2 June Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Western Front The Western Creative Media Design ADR003970 Edition 2 June 2015 The Somme Battlefield: Newfoundland Memorial Park at Beaumont Hamel Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The Somme Battlefield: Lochnagar Crater. It was blown at 0728 hours on 1 July 1916. Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front 2nd Edition June 2015 ii | THE WESTERN FRONT OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR ISBN: 978-1-874346-45-6 First published in August 2014 by Creative Media Design, Army Headquarters, Andover. Printed by Earle & Ludlow through Williams Lea Ltd, Norwich. Revised and expanded second edition published in June 2015. Text Copyright © Mungo Melvin, Editor, and the Authors listed in the List of Contributors, 2014 & 2015. Sketch Maps Crown Copyright © UK MOD, 2014 & 2015. Images Copyright © Imperial War Museum (IWM), National Army Museum (NAM), Mike St. Maur Sheil/Fields of Battle 14-18, Barbara Taylor and others so captioned. No part of this publication, except for short quotations, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the permission of the Editor and SO1 Commemoration, Army Headquarters, IDL 26, Blenheim Building, Marlborough Lines, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 8HJ. The First World War sketch maps have been produced by the Defence Geographic Centre (DGC), Joint Force Intelligence Group (JFIG), Ministry of Defence, Elmwood Avenue, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 7AH. United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Section, No-Man's Land Was Everywhere Exceptionally Wide
    Extract from ‘Westcountry Regiments on the Somme’ By Major (Retired) Tim Saunders MBE (Late D and D) This book covers the part played by both the Devonshire and Dorset Regiments in the 1916 Battle. It covers the arrival of the battalions on the Somme, preliminary operations and the part they played in the various phases of this grimmest of battles from the disaster of 1 July through to the very final attack in mid November. The extract below is on the attack of 2nd Battalion the Devonshire Regiment on Ovillers la Boissele on 1st July 1916; the blackest day in the long history of the British Army. Introduction Of the five Westcountry battalions in action on the first day of the battle, 2/Devon was one of the two battalions that attacked or ‘went over the top’ in the first wave at Zero Hour. They had arrived on the Somme, to join the Fourth Army, at the end of March with 8th Division joining III Corps. Along with the remainder of the Army, the Devons worked hard training and preparing for the great offensive. Meanwhile, the Germans, with only the questions of time, date and boundaries of the British attack to determine, continued to strengthen their position. The German Positions Opposite III Corps, the Germans 26th Reserve Division occupied positions on three spurs that ran down from the Pozieres Ridge. The two fingers of high ground of significance to 8th Division and the Devons were the Ovillers Spur and the la Boisselle Spur. Both were crowned with German held villages that had been developed into fortresses within the front line trench systems.
    [Show full text]
  • British 8Th Infantry Division on the Western Front, 1914-1918
    Centre for First World War Studies British 8th Infantry Division on the Western Front, 1914-18 by Alun Miles THOMAS Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law January 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Recent years have seen an increasingly sophisticated debate take place with regard to the armies on the Western Front during the Great War. Some argue that the British and Imperial armies underwent a ‘learning curve’ coupled with an increasingly lavish supply of munitions, which meant that during the last three months of fighting the BEF was able to defeat the German Army as its ability to conduct operations was faster than the enemy’s ability to react. This thesis argues that 8th Division, a war-raised formation made up of units recalled from overseas, became a much more effective and sophisticated organisation by the war’s end. It further argues that the formation did not use one solution to problems but adopted a sophisticated approach dependent on the tactical situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the First Day of the Somme
    This is a repository copy of Yorkshire and the First Day of the Somme. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99480/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Spiers, EM (2016) Yorkshire and the First Day of the Somme. Northern History, 53 (2). pp. 249-266. ISSN 0078-172X https://doi.org/10.1080/0078172X.2016.1195601 © 2016, University of Leeds. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Northern History on Sep 2016, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0078172X.2016.1195601. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 YORKSHIRE AND THE FIRST DAY OF THE SOMME EDWARD M.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING the BATTLE of the SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: a PYRRHIC VICTORY by Thomas G. Bradbeer M.A., Univ
    THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY By Thomas G. Bradbeer M.A., University of Saint Mary, 1999 Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________ Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson, PhD Committee members ____________________ Jonathan H. Earle, PhD ____________________ Adrian R. Lewis, PhD ____________________ Brent J. Steele, PhD ____________________ Jacob Kipp, PhD Date defended: March 28, 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Thomas G. Bradbeer certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY ___________________ Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson, PhD Date approved March 28, 2011 ii THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME, APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY ABSTRACT The Battle of the Somme was Britain’s first major offensive of the First World War. Just about every facet of the campaign has been analyzed and reexamined. However, one area of the battle that has been little explored is the second battle which took place simultaneously to the one on the ground. This second battle occurred in the skies above the Somme, where for the first time in the history of warfare a deliberate air campaign was planned and executed to support ground operations. The British Royal Flying Corps (RFC) was tasked with achieving air superiority over the Somme sector before the British Fourth Army attacked to start the ground offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Men of Ashdown Forest Who Fell in the First World War and Who Are Commemorated At
    Men of Ashdown Forest who fell in the First World War and who are commemorated at Forest Row, Hartfield and Coleman’s Hatch Volume One 1914 - 1916 1 Copyright © Ashdown Forest Research Group Published by: The Ashdown Forest Research Group The Ashdown Forest Centre Wych Cross Forest Row East Sussex RH18 5JP Website: http://www.ashdownforest.org/enjoy/history/AshdownResearchGroup.php Email: [email protected] First published: 4 August 2014 This revised edition: 27 November 2017 © The Ashdown Forest Research Group 2 Copyright © Ashdown Forest Research Group CONTENTS Introduction 4 Index, by surname 5 Index, by date of death 7 The Studies 9 Sources and acknowledgements 108 3 Copyright © Ashdown Forest Research Group INTRODUCTION The Ashdown Forest Research Group is carrying out a project to produce case studies on all the men who died while on military service during the 1914-18 war and who are commemorated by the war memorials at Forest Row and Hartfield and in memorial books at the churches of Holy Trinity, Forest Row, Holy Trinity, Coleman’s Hatch, and St. Mary the Virgin, Hartfield.1 We have confined ourselves to these locations, which are all situated on the northern edge of Ashdown Forest, for practical reasons. Consequently, men commemorated at other locations around Ashdown Forest are not covered by this project. Our aim is to produce case studies in chronological order, and we expect to produce 116 in total. This first volume deals with the 46 men who died between the declaration of war on 4 August 1914 and 31 December 1916. We hope you will find these case studies interesting and thought-provoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Claremen Who Fought in the Battle of the Somme July-November 1916
    ClaremenClaremen who who Fought Fought in The in Battle The of the Somme Battle of the Somme July-November 1916 By Ger Browne July-November 1916 1 Claremen who fought at The Somme in 1916 The Battle of the Somme started on July 1st 1916 and lasted until November 18th 1916. For many people, it was the battle that symbolised the horrors of warfare in World War One. The Battle Of the Somme was a series of 13 battles in 3 phases that raged from July to November. Claremen fought in all 13 Battles. Claremen fought in 28 of the 51 British and Commonwealth Divisions, and one of the French Divisions that fought at the Somme. The Irish Regiments that Claremen fought in at the Somme were The Royal Munster Fusiliers, The Royal Irish Regiment, The Royal Irish Fusiliers, The Royal Irish Rifles, The Connaught Rangers, The Leinster Regiment, The Royal Dublin Fusiliers and The Irish Guards. Claremen also fought at the Somme with the Australian Infantry, The New Zealand Infantry, The South African Infantry, The Grenadier Guards, The King’s (Liverpool Regiment), The Machine Gun Corps, The Royal Artillery, The Royal Army Medical Corps, The Royal Engineers, The Lancashire Fusiliers, The Bedfordshire Regiment, The London Regiment, The Manchester Regiment, The Cameronians, The Norfolk Regiment, The Gloucestershire Regiment, The Westminister Rifles Officer Training Corps, The South Lancashire Regiment, The Duke of Wellington's (West Riding Regiment). At least 77 Claremen were killed in action or died from wounds at the Somme in 1916. Hundred’s of Claremen fought in the Battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Newfoundland's Cultural Memory of the Attack at Beaumont Hamel, 1916-1925 Robert J
    Document généré le 25 sept. 2021 21:45 Newfoundland Studies Glorious Tragedy: Newfoundland's Cultural Memory of the Attack at Beaumont Hamel, 1916-1925 Robert J. Harding Volume 21, numéro 1, spring 2006 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/nflds21_1art01 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Faculty of Arts, Memorial University ISSN 0823-1737 (imprimé) 1715-1430 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Harding, R. J. (2006). Glorious Tragedy: Newfoundland's Cultural Memory of the Attack at Beaumont Hamel, 1916-1925. Newfoundland Studies, 21(1), 3–40. All rights reserved © Memorial University, 2006 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Glorious Tragedy: Newfoundland’s Cultural Memory of the Attack at Beaumont Hamel, 1916-1925 ROBERT J. HARDING THE FIRST OF JULY is a day of dual significance for Newfoundlanders. As Canada Day, it is a celebration of the dominion’s birth and development since 1867. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the day is also commemorated as the anniversary of the Newfoundland Regiment’s costliest engagement during World War I. For those who observe it, Memorial Day is a sombre occasion which recalls this war as a trag- edy for Newfoundland, symbolized by the Regiment’s slaughter at Beaumont Hamel, France, on 1 July 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • British 21 Infantry Division on the Western Front 1914
    Centre for First World War Studies BRITISH 21ST INFANTRY DIVISION ON THE WESTERN FRONT 1914 - 1918 A CASE STUDY IN TACTICAL EVOLUTION by KATHRYN LOUISE SNOWDEN A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern History School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham March 2001 i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This MPhil thesis is a case study of the British 21st Infantry Division on the Western Front during the First World War. It examines the progress of the division, analysing the learning curve of tactical evolution that some historians maintain was experienced by the British Expeditionary Force (BEF). 21st Division was a New Army division, typical of those raised after the declaration of war, and its performance throughout the war may be regarded as indicative of the progress or otherwise of these units within the BEF. The conclusions are drawn through an assessment of 21st Division in four battles during the war. The achievements of the division are analysed using a series of performance indicators, taking into account variables such as the weather, the terrain, and the enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Division on the Western Front, 1916-1918 By
    An Inter-Disciplinary Study of Learning in the 32nd Division on the Western Front, 1916-1918 by Stuart Bruce Taylor Mitchell Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The idea of a learning process has become broadly accepted among military historians of the First World War, but explanations for how and why this occurred remain limited. This thesis uses a number of different disciplines alongside more orthodox historical analysis of what the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) did at the divisional level to learn the lessons from combat in an uncompromising operational environment. At the beginning of 1916 the BEF was predominantly a citizen army lacking experience. This marked a low-point in the BEF's fighting capabilities. This thesis charts the development from 1916 to the Armistice in 1918 using the British 32nd Division as a case study. The division participated in a number of major operations including the Battle of the Somme, the German withdrawal to the Hindenburg Line, the Battles of Nieuport, Passchendaele, Amiens and the Hundred Days.
    [Show full text]