PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVE ROUTES

FOREST AVE

T

U

R

Q

U

O

I S

E

C D O FOREST AVE R LUM BU T T S A U S V R E *# Q MP 233.25 K U C I O

R I S D E

N D E C O R K LUM BU S T S A WI S T V T E Z *# S E MP 233.25 T SK R S YC O I C S ER C T A E RD S S I N V HN C Y A PE R N K E O E M V A S R U T W N A R I G S T T H F Z E S D T T E I S R B R S Y N O S C

S E A C T A

R S ú E S S I N V H C Y A P R N E O E M V A R U N A R G H E F D T I

B N R

S

ú A

ú S

D ú

R

E

E

R

T

D B E R UTLE

R AVE

N

E

E

O

R

L T B

E UTLER AVE

N

O L

WING MOUNTAIN RD 2 22 FS WING MOUNTAIN RD 2 22 FS D R

L D R

W

1 D L O 7 R

1 W B

1

D

R O 7 R S

1 B E W

F

R

S D O E W

F A N D O B S A N B S HIDDEN HOLLOW RD HIDDEN HOLLOW RD

XY XY

8 8 1 1 5 5

S S F

F D 6 0 LEGEND D R 6 5 0 LEGEND R IN 5 S

A Study Corridor IN T FOREST AVE F

A S Study Corridor T N FOREST AVE

U F Milton & US 180 N O U M See Inset Milton Road & US 180 O 1 M - See Inset A *# Interchange 1 MP 180.02 MP 215.44 XY Existing - *# A # XY MP 180.02*MP 215.44 XY Existing XY Proposed *# BUTLE YX D R X X AVE

Y Y R

Y B D U XY Proposed Proposed Grade- H X TLE YX D R AV R E X C

R

Y E

N

ú Separated Crossing Y E D H X Proposed Grade- A

R

R C T R MP 402.16

E

N E

ú Separated Crossing F *#

E

N A F

R

US 180 Alternative O

A

T R L

T MP 402.16

S E

Routes F X *# Y

G N

F

A X

US 180 Alternative O

A

System Alternative 7 L Y L

F D

T V

S

Routes L X Y

System Alternative 8 G B

A H X

System Alternative 7 L A Y System Alternative 9 F D LV UL System AlternaStyivstee m8 Alternative 10 BE H B A System AlternaStyivstee m9 Alternative 11 L U System AlternaStyivsete m10 Alternative 12 E B System Alternative 13 System Alternative 11 X System AlternaStyivstee m12 Alternative 14 Y System Alternative 15 System Alternative 13 System Alternative 16 System AlternaStyivstee m14 Alternative 17 YX System AlternaStyivstee m15 Alternative 18 System Alternative 16 System Alternative 17 0 1 2 4 Miles E System Alternative 18

0 1 2 4 Miles E PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES 7, 8, & 9 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES MAP DESCRIPTION THIS ALTERNATIVE SHOULD? System Alternative 7 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated fom Move Forward for Further Columbus ‐> Switzer Canyon ‐>Route 66 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •1.3 miles •2 General Purpose (GP) and a center turn . •Travelers with southern destinations could proceed east on Route 66 to Ponderosa Pkwy., then to Butler Ave. and its interchange with I-40 west to then proceed to I-17 south. System Alternative 8 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated fom Move Forward for Further Columbus -> Beaver -> Butler (SB One Way) & Butler ->San Francisco -> Columbus (NB One Way) Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •2.8 miles •Columbus Ave. is 3 a lane collector with 2 GP lanes and a center turn lane. •Beaver St. (SB) & San Francisco St. (NB) are one- way with 2-3 GP lanes with parking on both sides. Both include at-grade railroad crossings.

System Alternative 9 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated fom Move Forward for Further Forest -> Turquoise -> Switzer Canyon -> Route 66 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •1.8 miles •Adequate dedicated left turn lane at SB US 180 at Forest Ave. •Forest Ave. is a 3 lane collector 2 GP lanes and a center turn lane with bike lanes to San Francis- co St. Forest Ave. has moderate grades and is a 5 lane facility with 4 GP lanes and a center turn lane. PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES 10, 11, & 12 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES MAP DESCRIPTION THIS ALTERNATIVE SHOULD? System Alternative 10 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Cable Propelled Gondola Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card Detailed studies would be necessary to explore the economic cost effectiveness and environmental practicality of a gondola system with respect to its potential to be situated in proximity to the REMOVEDenvironmentally and culturally sensitiveBY Kachina PROJECT PARTNERS Peaks Wilderness Area.

System Alternative 11 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Milton ->Route 66 -> Flagstaff Ranch Road -> I-40 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •SB approach to Route 66 has a 250 ft. dedicated right turn. •Route 66 at its widest is 5 lanes with 4 GP lanes and a center turn lane, and is 3 lanes at its narrowest with 2 GP lanes and a center turn lane. •Flagstaff Ranch Rd. offers full interchange access to I-40 where the majority of winter recreation likely will continue approximately 2.75 miles to I-17 south.

System Alternative 12 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Lone Tree Road Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •Located approximately ¾ miles east of Milton Rd. •Planned to be 100 ft. ROW with 4 GP lanes, a raised median, bike lanes, pathways on both sides, a on one side and a FUTS on one side. •Requires a traffic interchange to connect with I-40 and a grade-separated BNSF railway to connect with Route 66. PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES 13, 14, & 15 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES MAP DESCRIPTION THIS ALTERNATIVE SHOULD? System Alternative 13 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Mike’s Pike -> Humphreys (NB one way) Study Further Study Study with Adjustments & Kendrick -> Sitgreaves -> Milton Please Fill out a Comment Card •NB traffic to Mike’s Pike St. to a future proposed to Humphrey’s St. with a concept. •SB traffic to 2 lane Kendrick St., then right turn at Elm St. to Sitgreaves St. which is a 2 lane local with on-street parking. Then merge onto Milton Rd. southbound. Additional analysis needed of overpass and adjacent redevelopment efforts. System Alternative 14 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Milton -> Route 66 -> Woodland’s Village -> Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Beulah -> John Wesley Powell -> I-17 South Please Fill out a Comment Card •Route 66 is a 5 lane roadway with 4 GP lanes and a center turn lane. •Woodland’s Village Blvd. is a 4 lane divided, access controlled, collector roadway with 2 GP lanes. •2.75 miles of 2 lane roadway on Beulah Blvd. to the JW Powell traffic interchange to I-17.

System Alternative 15 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Bader -> FS 518 -> A-1 Mountain -> I-40 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •Route is 7.6 miles. •Requires extensive coordination with Coconino County, the US Forest Service and would require federal environmental clearance. •Proposed facility could be a dirt road or paved roadway. PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES 16, 17, & 18 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES MAP DESCRIPTION THIS ALTERNATIVE SHOULD? System Alternative 16 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Snow Bowl Road -> A-1 Mountain Road -> I-40 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •Route is 7.3 miles. •Requires extensive coordination with Coconino County, the US Forest Service and would require federal environmental clearance. •Proposed facility could be a dirt road or paved roadway.

System Alternative 17 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Wing Mountain Rd -> FS 222 -> FS 171 -> I-40 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •Route is 7.3 miles. •Utilizes existing traffic interchange in Bellmont, AZ. •Requires extensive coordination with Coconino County, the US Forest Service and would require federal environmental clearance.

•Proposed facility could be a dirt road or paved roadway.

System Alternative 18 Move Forward for Further Be Eliminated from Move Forward for Further Hidden Hollow Rd -> FS 506 -> Route 66 -> I-40 Study Further Study Study with Adjustments Please Fill out a Comment Card •Route is 5.5 miles. •A southbound right turn deceleration lane on US 180 approaching Hidden Hollow Road will likely be necessary. •Requires extensive coordination with Coconino County, the US Forest Service and would require federal environmental clearance. •Proposed facility could be a dirt road or paved roadway.