DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rules of Engagement in the Conduct of Special Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rules of Engagement in the Conduct of Special Operations NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California thesis THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS by Michael S. Reilly December 1996 Thesis Advisor: John Arquilla Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SCHOOL Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) | 5! REP6RT t)ATE T. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AMD SUBTITLE T. FUNDING NUMBERS THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS 6. AUtHOR(S) Reilly, Michael S. 7. PERFORMING oRgaN1ZaTI6N NaME(S) aND addREss(Es) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9~ SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.SPONSOR1NG /MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 1 1 . SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. dIstRIbUtIoN/aVaILabILIty STATEMENT T2b! DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) This thesis examines the effect that ROE have on the conduct of special operations in order to contribute to an increased understanding of the proper employment of elite forces. It argues that "inappropriate" ROE can result from 1) an imbalance in the natural tension between the requirements of statecraft and military efficiency present in all military operations and 2) organizational friction resulting from inaccurate translation of broad political objectives, through various levels in the chain of command, into an inappropriate tactical ROE for a specific unit. Additionally, it argues that the nature of special operations missions, and the principles vital to their proper employment, cause them to be most sensitive to these sources of inappropriate ROE in either crisis or conflict. This thesis concludes that ROE can be used to achieve indirect political control over special operations, but achieving this control is more difficult and more hazardous with special operations than with conventional forces. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF Rules of Engagement (ROE), Special Operations Forces (SOF), special PAGES operations, control, Operation Just Cause, command and Panama, 242 UNOSOM II, Somalia IE PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY i$. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT THIS PAGE ABSTRACT UL Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102 11 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS Michael S. Reilly Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy B.S\, United States Naval Academy, 1986 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL December, 1996 DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY K »«™,»„m ' "GRADUATE SCHOOL ABSTRACT MONTEREY CA 93943-5101 This thesis examines the effect that ROE have on the conduct of special operations in order to contribute to an increased understanding of the proper employment of elite forces. It argues that "inappropriate" ROE can result from 1) an imbalance in the natural tension between the requirements of statecraft and military efficiency present in all military operations and 2) organizational friction resulting from inaccurate translation of broad political objectives, through various levels in the chain of command, into an inappropriate tactical ROE for a specific unit. Additionally, it argues that the nature of special operations, and the principles vital to their proper employment, cause them to be most sensitive to these sources of inappropriate ROE in either crisis or conflict. This thesis concludes that ROE can be used to achieve indirect political control over special operations, but achieving this control is more difficult and more hazardous with special operations than with conventional forces. v VI . .... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 A. RELEVANCE 1 B . PURPOSE 3 C . THESIS OVERVIEW 5 II THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 13 A. ROE IN THEORY 14 1 Definitions 14 2 Development Of Current ROE Methods 16 3 Forms Of Indirect Control Using ROE 23 4. Influences In The Creation Of ROE 24 5 How The Roe Control The Use Of Force 27 B ROE IN REALITY 32 1 Organization Theory 33 2 Definitions 34 3 The Structural Frame of Reference 36 4. The Human Resource Frame of Reference 43 5. The Political Frame of Reference 51 6 The Cultural Frame of Reference 54 C . CONCLUSIONS 58 III THEORY OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS AND ROE 61 A. DEFINITIONS AND TYPOLOGY 62 1 Definitions 62 2 Typology of Special Operations 63 VI .. .. B. THE STRATEGIC LEVEL OF ANALYSIS - 68 C THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL OF ANALYSIS 76 D THE TACTICAL LEVEL OF ANALYSIS 78 E . CONCLUSIONS 87 IV. PANAMA: THE PAITILLA AIRPORT OPERATION 91 A INTRODUCTION 91 B BACKGROUND 93 1 The Situation in Panama 93 2 The Political Objectives 97 3 Military Objectives 101 4. The Resulting ROE for Operation Just Cause 106 C . TASK FORCE WHITE OPERATIONS 108 1. TF White's Objectives 108 2 . Planning 110 3 . Execution 122 D. ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS 132 V. SOMALIA 13 9 A. INTRODUCTION 139 B . BACKGROUND 141 C. THE INTERVENTION: POLITICAL GOALS, MILITARY OBJECTIVES AND THE ROE 144 1 UNOSOM I 144 2 UNITAF 145 3 UNOSOM II 147 D FACTORS COMPLICATING THE ROE 152 Vlll . E TASK FORCE RANGER OPERATIONS 154 1 Background 154 2 Analysis 158 a Planning Phase 158 b. Execution Phase 163 F SOF SNIPER OPERATIONS 168 1 Background 168 2. Analysis 170 G CONCLUSIONS 177 VI . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 181 APPENDIX A. ROE FOR OPERATION JUST CAUSE 191 APPENDIX B. UNITAF RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 193 APPENDIX C . UNOSOM II RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 195 APPENDIX D. UNOSOM II FRAGMENTARY ORDERS 3 9 AND 101 199 APPENDIX E . TASK FORCE RANGER ROE 2 01 APPENDIX F. ROE USED BY SOF SNIPERS 203 APPENDIX G. MAPS 2 05 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 211 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 217 IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ROE under which SOF operate were initially influenced and formalized with ships, aircraft or general purpose ground forces in mind. These ROE were created within a Cold War setting and calibrated to minimize chances of sparking general war with the USSR. With the end of the Cold War and an increased focus on and employment of SOF, it is imperative that the ROE governing special operations be examined. The ROE used in the conduct of special operations influence the success or failure of these operations, and in turn contribute to the success or failure of national policy. The purpose of this thesis is to address the effect that the ROE have on the conduct of special operations and to contribute to an increased understanding of the proper employment of elite forces. Specifically, this thesis addresses two questions. First, can ROE be used to achieve indirect political control over special operations? Second, what are the causes and consequences of "inappropriate" ROE when employing SOF in pursuit of political objectives? I argue that there are two causes of inappropriate ROE. First, inappropriate ROE can result from an imbalance in the natural tension between the requirements of statecraft and military efficiency present in all military operations. This tension becomes greater in the OOTW environment where the political objectives and military requirements experience the greatest XI . 1 divergence. Oddly, the ROE are a case where healthy "pulling and hauling" between policy makers and military commanders makes for better, rather than worse, overall outcomes. Second, while inappropriate ROE can result from an imbalance in the political-military tension, I argue that organizational friction is also a cause of inappropriate ROE. Using organization theory, this thesis examines how organizational friction is created from inaccurate translation of broad political objectives, through various levels in the chain of command, into inappropriate tactical ROE for a specific unit. In this situation there can exist, not only written ROE, but also implicit ROE. Finally, I argue that the nature of special operations, and the principles vital to their proper employment, cause them to be most sensitive to these sources of inappropriate ROE in either a crisis or conflict. This thesis lays out exactly how the ROE can affect SOF and their ability to conduct operations successfully on a strategic, operational and tactical level in support of a larger military or national purpose. U.S. intervention in two different cases, Panama and Somalia, are examined through a process of "analytic induction" to illustrate the results of employing ROE that are inappropriate in the conduct of special operations The first case, the U.S. Navy SEAL raid on Paitilla airfield during Operation Just Cause, illustrates how XI . inappropriate ROE are created through organizational friction. Operation Just Cause was a unilateral U.S. action influenced by a great concern for minimizing collateral damage in an effort to avoid domestic and international criticism. During the translation of the political goals into military objectives and tactical ROE by each level in the chain of command, inferences "shaped" the written ROE and created implicit ROE which further restricted the conduct of this operation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A RESOLUTION to Honor Four-Star General Carl Wade Stiner, Co-Author of Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces, a Best-Selling Book
    Filed for intro on 05/01/2002 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 925 By Goins A RESOLUTION to honor Four-Star General Carl Wade Stiner, co-author of Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces, a best-selling book. WHEREAS, this General Assembly is proud to honor those persons whose professional achievements have redounded to the benefit of the public good; and WHEREAS, General Carl Stiner is one such person, whose brilliant and distinguished military career has led to a prominent role in contributing to Shadow Warriors, co-authored by Tom Clancy about the U.S. Special Forces; and WHEREAS, born in LaFollette, General Stiner was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U. S. Army in May, 1958, following graduation from the Tennessee Polytechnical Institute with a Bachelor of Science degree in Agriculture. He later earned a Master of Science degree in Public Administration from Shippensburg State College; and WHEREAS, General Stiner was the Second Commander-in-Chief of the United States Special Operations Command headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, from May, 1990 to May, 1993. As Commander-in-Chief, he was responsible for the readiness of all Special Operations Forces of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, both in active duty and the reserves; and HJR0925 01425247 -1- WHEREAS, his major assignments include duty as Company Commander of the 5th Battalion, 1st Training Brigade. From August, 1964 until May, 1966, he was assigned to the 3rd Special Forces Group as Detachment Command and Company Operations Officer; and WHEREAS, following a tour in Southeast Asia, General Stiner reported for assignment to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Wars Journal U.S. Special Operations
    Small Wars Journal www.smallwarsjournal.com U.S. Special Operations - Personal Opinions John M. Collins 1st Battalion, 1st Special Warfare Training Group Camp Mackall, NC, 11 December 2008 Vice Admiral James Stockdale, a Medal of Honor recipient and H. Ross Perot’s Vice Presidential running mate in 1992, opened his first and only televised appearance with these words: “Who am I? Why am I here?” His audience never did figure that out, but I’m gonna tell you right up front who I REALLY am and why I’m here. My Credentials I’m a paper-pusher with no decorations for valor. I’m an honorary member of Special Forces Chapter XIII in Korea, but remain a wannabe who never wore a green beret and briefly served with only one Special Ops outfit more than 40 years ago. That makes me feel like Elizabeth Taylor’s eighth husband on their wedding night: I know what I’m supposed to do, but I’m not sure how to make it interesting, because my knowledge about SOF is almost all second hand. Even so, I take comfort from long-standing close contact with a slew of icons like Bill Yarborough, who convinced President Kennedy that Army Special Forces possessed the capabilities he needed to combat Communist insurgencies; Sam Wilson, who helped convince Congress that it should create a U.S. Special Operations Command; and Barbwire Bob Kingston, who helped convince top-level decision-makers that Delta Force could provide the USA with much needed counterterrorism capabilities. Those great men all called me John and I called them by their first name, which is General.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Compellence and Accommodation In
    Excerpt from Compellence and Accommodation in Counterinsurgency Warfare A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Politics Department Robert J. Art, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Jacqueline L. Hazelton August 2011 Part II Successful Enemy-Centric-Plus Counterinsurgency Chapter 3 The Case Of Dhofar, Oman, 1965-1976 INTRODUCTION Oman defeated a nationalist-Communist insurgency that enjoyed a secure cross- border base and external state support. It took 11 years and significant British and regional military and political backing. Oman, on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, has remained a stable state and a Western ally ever since. How did it happen? The conventional wisdom on Dhofar says the rise of an enlightened leader brought fast economic and political development, gained the allegiance of the populace, and thus defeated the insurgency. This view supports the contemporary counterinsurgency (COIN) emphasis on a population-centric approach to success.1 Archival research and interviews with British officers who led the campaign reveal a more complex, less ambitious success. The COIN campaign began with the use of collective punishment and reprisals against the populace as a whole, but the British-led Sultan’s Armed Forces (SAF) only managed to fight the growing insurgency to a stalemate. The campaign entered a new phase under a new, British-approved sultan. Hard fighting reliant on superior firepower and mobility eventually defeated the insurgency 1 A number of scholars include Dhofar in the ranks of population-centric successes. See, e.g., Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • International Co-Operation in the Use of Elite Military
    INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION IN THE USE OF ELITE MILITARY FORCES TO COUNTER TERRORISM: THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN EXPERIENCE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THEIR RESPECTIVE EXPERIENCES IN THE EVOLUTION OF LOW-INTENSITY OPERATIONS BY JOSEPH PAUL DE BOUCHERVILLE TAILLON A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE LONDON, ENGLAND, 1992 UMI Number: U615541 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615541 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7 0 XJl\lbj6S3 ABSTRACT J. Paul de B. Taillon "International Co-operation in the Employment of Elite Military Forces to Counter-Terrorism: The British and American Experience With Special Reference to Their Respective Experiences in the Evolution of Low-Intensity Operations." This thesis examines the employment of elite military forces in low-intensity and counter-terrorist operations, and in particular, placing the principal emphasis on the aspect of international co-operation in the latter. The experiences of Great Britain and the United States in such operations are the main elements of the discussion, reflecting their heavy involvement in such operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers in Berets the Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003
    Brothers in Berets The Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003 Forrest L. Marion, PhD Air Force History and Museums Program In Conjunction With Air Force Special Operations Command Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editors Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belinda Bazinet and Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Names: Marion, Forrest L., author. | Air University (U.S.). Press, publisher. | Curtis E. LeMay Center for Copy Editor Doctrine Development and Education, issuing body. Tammi Dacus Title: Brothers in berets : the evolution of Air Force Cover Art and Book Design Special Tactics, 1953-2003 / Forrest L. Marion Daniel Armstrong Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, Curtis E. LeMay Cen- Composition and Prepress Production Michele D. Harrell ter for Doctrine Development and Education, [2018]. | At head of title: Air University, Curtis E. LeMay Center Print Preparation and Distribution for Doctrine Development and Education. | Includes Diane Clark bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017059577| ISBN 9781585662784 | ISBN 158566278X Subjects: LCSH: United States. Air Force—Combat controllers—History. | United States. Air Force— Commando troops—History. | Special forces (Military science)—United States—History. | United States. Air Force Special Operations Command. Classification: LCC UG633 .M3144 2018 | DDC AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS 358.4131—dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:T 11
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4
    WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG From Satellite Tracking to Space Situational Awareness: Features The USAF and Space Surveillance 1957-2007 Rick W. Sturdevant 4 Precision Aerial Bombardment of Strategic Targets: Its Rise, Fall, and Resurrection Daniel L. Haulman 24 Operation Just Cause: An Air Power Perspective Stetson M. Siler 34 The P–51 Mustang: The Most Important Aircraft in History? Marshall L. Michel 46 Book Reviews The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 By Rick Atkinson Reviewed by Curtis H. O’Sullivan 58 The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 By Rick Atkinson Reviewed by Grant T. Weller 58 Gunning for the Red Baron By Leon Bennett Reviewed by Carl A. Christie 58 Clash of Eagles: USAAF 8th Air Force Bombers versus the Luftwafffe in World War II By Martin W. Bowman Reviewed by Anthony E. Wessel 59 Red Moon Rising: Sputnik and the Hidden Rivalries that Ignited the Space Race By Matthew Brzezinski Reviewed by J. Ron Davis 59 Danger Close: Tactical Air Controllers in Afghanistan and Iraq By Steve Call Reviewed by David J. Schepp 60 A Tale of Two Quagmires: Iraq, Vietnam, and the Hard Lessons of War By Kenneth J. Campbell Reviewed by John L. Cirafici 60 Risk and Exploration: Earth, Sea, and the Stars By Steven J. Dick & Keith L. Cowing, Eds. Reviewed by Steven Pomeroy 61 Under the Guns of the Red Baron: Von Richtofen’s Victories and Victims Fully Illustrated By Norman Franks, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 29/09/2021 10:09:31
    Coin: the missing currency in peace support operations and beyond Item Type Thesis Authors Pinder, David Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 29/09/2021 10:09:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/2320 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. COIN: THE MISSING CURRENCY IN PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND BEYOND? David Pinder Dissertation submitted for The degree of Master of Philosophy Department of Peace Studies University of Bradford 2007 ABSTRACT David PINDER COIN: THE MISSING CURRENCY IN PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND BEYOND? Keywords: Counterinsurgency, Peacekeeping, Peace Enforcement, Peace Support Operations, Intervention, Post-conflict Stabilisation, UN Military Missions The United Nations has a long history of peacekeeping missions. These have evolved over time but since the end of the Cold War there has been rapid growth in those missions where the remit placed on the peacekeepers, both military and civilian, is more complex and demanding. In trying to define these missions and their mandates a wide range of terminology has been developed in an effort to describe the exact nature of the mission.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small War in Panama
    A Small War in Panama The main Air Force contribution to Operation Just Cause was the airlift, which doubled the number of combat troops in the country. By John T. Correll n 1989, the United States decided “You could not buy Manuel Noriega, juries in Miami and Tampa, Fla., to take down the Noriega regime in but you could rent him,” said Gen. Colin indicted Noriega on 13 counts of Panama by military force. Manuel L. Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs violating US racketeering and drug Antonio Noriega had been dictator of Staff. laws. The indictments said he took Iof the country since 1983. Over the In addition to his moonlighting for the $4.6 million in payoffs for allowing the years, he had been on and off the CIA CIA, Noriega had side deals with Cuba, Colombian cartel to use Panamanian payroll, but that relationship soured as Libya, and other intelligence customers, ports and airports to ship cocaine to the his corruption, repression, and collusion and he allowed the Soviet KGB to oper- United States. In retaliation, the PDF in drug smuggling became too blatant ate freely in Panama. His ties with the intensified harassment of US military to ignore. Medellin drug cartel in Colombia were members and dependents in Panama. Noriega had risen in the service of close and of long standing. The United States had a stake in Panama’s previous dictator, Omar Torrijos, Noriega was ruthless in eliminating Panamanian affairs because of both who called him “my gangster.” the opposition. He ousted two elected the drug smuggling and continuing US Torrijos died in an airplane crash in Presidents when they resisted his will.
    [Show full text]
  • The Command and Control of Special Operations Forces
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1996-12 The command and control of Special Operations Forces Brown, Harry S. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39299 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE COMMAND AND CONTROL .OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES by Harry S. Brown December 1996 Thesis Advisor: Rodney Minott Second Reader: Wayne Hughes Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 19970626 051 Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of infonnation is estimated to average I hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction. searching existing data sources, of this gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of infonnation. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect collection of infonnation, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Infonnation Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0!88) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996. Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Command and Control of Special Operations Forces 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Harry Scott Brown 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletternewsletter
    TheThe DevonshireDevonshire andand DorsetDorset RegimentalRegimental AssociationAssociation THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER No 12 - 2018 ASSOCIATION REGIMENTAL AND DORSET THE DEVONSHIRE THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER No 12 - 2018 ASSOCIATION REGIMENTAL AND DORSET THE DEVONSHIRE 11th, 39th and 54th of Foot TheThe NewsletterNewsletter No 12 2018 THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER 2018 Contents Locations 2 The Regimental Charities 36 The Regimental Association 2 Regimental Reunion 38 Regimental Association Reunion 2019 2 Events Chairman’s Message 3 Bois des Buttes Centenary 44 President’s Message 4 Pte Sidney Humphris Centenary 50 Association Calendar 5 Locquignol Liberation Centenary 52 Appointments 7 Minden Dorsets Band Concert 54 Editorial 8 LCpl Onions VC Memorial Plaque 54 Supporting the Regimental Association 8 Weymouth Remembrance Parade 55 The Association Website 10 Weymouth Veterans Weekend 56 Information on Branches 11 Photographic Memories 58 Focal Point Leaders 12 Historical Articles President's Awards 13 A Tale of Two Victoria Crosses 63 Notices 14 Wimbledon Parish Church Memorials 64 Postbag 16 The Battle of Plassey 66 The Keep Military Museum 19 11th Foot Military Aid, Cornwall 1873 70 Branch Reports Fovant Badges 71 Band 22 An Extraordinary Man 72 Bridport 23 Malta GC 74 Exeter 23 Sarah Sands - a Little Known Fact 76 Gillingham 26 The Other William Shakespear 77 Honiton 28 Welfare Report 78 The Officers' Club 28 News from The Rifles 84 D and D Old Comrades Forum 29 Bankers order form The Bugle 88 Plymouth 31 Last Post 89 Poole 33 Obituaries 91 Purbeck 34 Support Your Newsletter 95 Semper Fidelis Dinner Club 34 Editor: Lieutenant Colonel (Retired) GS Nicholls © Crown Copyright: This publication contains official information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devonshire and Dorset Regimental Association Newsletter
    THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER THE DEVONSHIRE AND DORSET REGIMENTAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER 2017 Contents Locations 2 Plymouth 23 The Regimental Association 2 Poole 23 Regimental Association Reunion 2018 2 Purbeck 24 Chairman’s Message 3 Semper Fidelis Dinner Club 24 President’s Message 3 Weymouth 25 Association Calendar 4 The Regimental Charities 26 Appointments 6 Regimental Reunion 26 Editorial 7 Supporting the Regimental Association 7 Events The Association Website 8 Field of Remembrance 30 Information on Branches 9 Junior Soldiers Reunion at Wyvern Barracks 31 Focal Point Leaders 10 The Regimental Memorial at the President's Awards 11 National Memorial Arboretum 32 Notices 12 Legion d'Honneur Awards 44 Postbag 12 Tirah Memorial Service - Dorchester 44 The Keep Military Museum 14 Plassey Day Celebrations 46 Branch Reports An Unknown Dorset Regiment Soldier 46 Band 15 New Memorial Unveiled at Wagon Hill 47 Bath 16 Bridport 16 Welfare Report 48 Exeter 16 News from The Rifles 51 Exmouth 17 Bankers order form The Bugle 56 Gillingham 18 Last Post 57 The Officers' Club 19 Obituaries 58 D and D Old Comrades Forum 21 Memorial Donors 66 Editor: Lieutenant Colonel (Retired) GS Nicholls © Crown Copyright: This publication contains official information. It should be treated with discretion by the recipient. The opinions expressed in the articles in this journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy and views, official or otherwise, of the Regiment or the Ministry of Defence. No responsibility for the goods or services advertised in this journal can be accepted by the publishers or printers.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Hearts and Minds” Fallacy the “Hearts and Jacqueline L
    The “Hearts and Minds” Fallacy The “Hearts and Jacqueline L. Minds” Fallacy Hazelton Violence, Coercion, and Success in Counterinsurgency Warfare Debates over how governments can defeat insurgencies ebb and ºow with international events. Such debates tend to arise when the United States runs into problems in its efforts to support a counterinsurgent government. Often the United States approaches the problem of an armed, organized, internal nonstate political challenge to a government as a zero-sum game. In this competition, the state and nonstate actors compete for popular support and cooperation. The U.S. prescription for success is twofold: to provide support for liberaliz- ing, democratizing reforms designed to reduce popular grievances and gain popular support while weakening the insurgency, and to target insurgents with military force without harming civilians. I identify this prescription as the “good governance approach” for its focus on building a liberal, reform- ist central government to quell insurgency. Others have referred to it as the “population-centric approach,” the “comprehensive approach,” or the “hearts-and-minds approach.”1 In this article, I reconsider the effectiveness of the good governance ap- proach in light of the extreme difªculty that liberal great powers have experi- enced in applying it in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. Since the al-Qaida attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States has been trying to help smaller Jacqueline L. Hazelton is Assistant Professor of Strategy and Policy at the U.S. Naval War College. For their helpful comments, the author thanks the anonymous reviewers, Robert Art, Andrew Birtle, Nick Carter, Joseph Collins, Conrad Crane, David Edelstein, William Fallon, Brendan Green, Chaim Kaufmann, Rodrigo Javier Massi, Emily Meierding, J.E.
    [Show full text]