DOCSLIB.ORG

The Command and Control of Special Operations Forces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Command and Control of Special Operations Forces Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1996-12 The command and control of Special Operations Forces Brown, Harry S. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39299 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE COMMAND AND CONTROL .OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES by Harry S. Brown December 1996 Thesis Advisor: Rodney Minott Second Reader: Wayne Hughes Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 19970626 051 Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of infonnation is estimated to average I hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction. searching existing data sources, of this gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of infonnation. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect collection of infonnation, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Infonnation Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0!88) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996. Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Command and Control of Special Operations Forces 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Harry Scott Brown 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. ABSTRACI' (maximum 200 words) Today integrated operations are a prime requirement of Special Operations Forces (SOF) and General Purpose Forces (GPF) of all services. None can unilaterally conduct operations because of strategic lift and logistic limitations. No unit is capable of all types of missions nor should any unit or its leadership believe it is capable of all types of missions. SOF must become more able to integrate jointly with all branches and services to secure its future effectiveness. This thesis looks at historical examples of four integrated operations and illustrates some definitive problems associated with them. It shows how four variables are especially significant to all levels of an operation. These variables may affect the outcome of operations significantly enough to be considered essential. The thesis summarizes the problems associated with each operation and looks at some future implications for joint warfare. 15. NUMBER OF 14. SUBJECI' TERMS Command and Control; Unity of Command; Unity of Effort; Simplicity PAGES and Timing 138 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICA- 18. SECURITY CLASSIFI- 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICA- 20. LIMITATION OF TION OF REPORT CATION OF THIS PAGE TION OF ABSTRACI' ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102 ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. THE COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES Harry S. Brown Captain(P), United States Army B.S., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, May, 1986 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS SPECIAL OPERATIONS/LOW INTENSITY CONFLICT from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL December 1996 Author: Approved by: Frank C. Petho, Chairman Department of National Security Affairs lll iv ABSTRACT Today integrated operations are a prime requirement of Special Operations Forces (SOF) and General Purpose Forces (GPF) of all services. None can unilaterally conduct operations because of strategic lift and logistic limitations. No unit is capable of all types of missions nor should any unit or its leadership believe it is capable of all types of missions. SOF must become more able to integrate jointly with all branches and services to secure its future effectiveness. This thesis looks at historical examples of four integrated operations and illustrates some definitive problems associated with them. It shows how four variables are especially significant to all levels of an operation. These variables may affect the outcome of operations significantly enough to be considered essential. The thesis summarizes the problems associated with each operation and looks at some future implications for joint warfare. v vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 A. THE PROBLEM ..................................................................................................... 1 B. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 3 C. THE PHENOMENON OF COMMAND AND CONTROL. .................................. 4 1. United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) ................................ 6 2. Special Operations Forces (SOF) Missions ........................................................ 7 3. General Purpose Forces (GPF) ............................................................................ 8 D. DEFIN"ffiONS ......................................................................................................... 8 E. SCOPE ..................................................................................................................... 10 F. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 11 ll. IRAN RESCUE (EAGLE CLAW) ................................................................................. 13 A. DESERT ONE .......................................................................................................... 13 1. Situation .............................................................................................................. 13 2. The Rescue Mission- Concept of the Operation ................................................. 16 3. The Operation- Plans and Training ..................................................................... 17 4. Conduct of the Operation ..................................................................................... 20 B. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF COMMAND .............................................................. 22 1. Command Structure - The Chain of Command ................................................... 24 C. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF EFFORT ..................................................................... 26 D. ANALYSIS OF SIMPLICITY ................................................................................. 27 E. ANALYSIS OFTIMING......................................................................................... 28 vii F. CONCLUSION........................................................................................................ 29 III. GRENADA (URGENT FURY) ..................................................................................... 31 A. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 31 1. Situation - Political and Military ......................................................................... 31 2. Mission - Concept of the Operation .................................................................... 32 3. The Operation- Plans and Training by the JCS .................................................. 34 4. Conduct of the Operation .................................................................................... 35 B. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF COMMAND ............................................................. 38 1. Command Structure - The Chain of Command ................................................. .43 C. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF EFFORT .................................................................... 44 D. ANALYSIS OF SIMPLICITY ................................................................................ 46 E. ANALYSIS OF TIMING ........................................................................................ 46 F. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 47 IV. PANAMA (JUST CAUSE) ........................................................................................... 51 A. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 51 1. Situation- Political and Military .......................................................................... 51 2. Mission - Concept of the Operation .................................................................... 54 3. Concept of the Operation .............................................. .' ...................................... 55 4. Operational Guidance from the Operations Order (OPORD) .............................. 57 5. Outcome of the Operation .................................................................................... 59 B. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF COMMAND .............................................................. 61 C. ANALYSIS OF UNITY OF EFFORT ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rules of Engagement in the Conduct of Special Operations
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California thesis THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS by Michael S. Reilly December 1996 Thesis Advisor: John Arquilla Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SCHOOL Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) | 5! REP6RT t)ATE T. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AMD SUBTITLE T. FUNDING NUMBERS THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS 6. AUtHOR(S) Reilly, Michael S. 7. PERFORMING oRgaN1ZaTI6N NaME(S) aND addREss(Es) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9~ SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.SPONSOR1NG /MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 1 1 . SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. dIstRIbUtIoN/aVaILabILIty STATEMENT T2b! DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • A RESOLUTION to Honor Four-Star General Carl Wade Stiner, Co-Author of Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces, a Best-Selling Book
    Filed for intro on 05/01/2002 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 925 By Goins A RESOLUTION to honor Four-Star General Carl Wade Stiner, co-author of Shadow Warriors: Inside the Special Forces, a best-selling book. WHEREAS, this General Assembly is proud to honor those persons whose professional achievements have redounded to the benefit of the public good; and WHEREAS, General Carl Stiner is one such person, whose brilliant and distinguished military career has led to a prominent role in contributing to Shadow Warriors, co-authored by Tom Clancy about the U.S. Special Forces; and WHEREAS, born in LaFollette, General Stiner was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U. S. Army in May, 1958, following graduation from the Tennessee Polytechnical Institute with a Bachelor of Science degree in Agriculture. He later earned a Master of Science degree in Public Administration from Shippensburg State College; and WHEREAS, General Stiner was the Second Commander-in-Chief of the United States Special Operations Command headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, from May, 1990 to May, 1993. As Commander-in-Chief, he was responsible for the readiness of all Special Operations Forces of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, both in active duty and the reserves; and HJR0925 01425247 -1- WHEREAS, his major assignments include duty as Company Commander of the 5th Battalion, 1st Training Brigade. From August, 1964 until May, 1966, he was assigned to the 3rd Special Forces Group as Detachment Command and Company Operations Officer; and WHEREAS, following a tour in Southeast Asia, General Stiner reported for assignment to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Wars Journal U.S. Special Operations
    Small Wars Journal www.smallwarsjournal.com U.S. Special Operations - Personal Opinions John M. Collins 1st Battalion, 1st Special Warfare Training Group Camp Mackall, NC, 11 December 2008 Vice Admiral James Stockdale, a Medal of Honor recipient and H. Ross Perot’s Vice Presidential running mate in 1992, opened his first and only televised appearance with these words: “Who am I? Why am I here?” His audience never did figure that out, but I’m gonna tell you right up front who I REALLY am and why I’m here. My Credentials I’m a paper-pusher with no decorations for valor. I’m an honorary member of Special Forces Chapter XIII in Korea, but remain a wannabe who never wore a green beret and briefly served with only one Special Ops outfit more than 40 years ago. That makes me feel like Elizabeth Taylor’s eighth husband on their wedding night: I know what I’m supposed to do, but I’m not sure how to make it interesting, because my knowledge about SOF is almost all second hand. Even so, I take comfort from long-standing close contact with a slew of icons like Bill Yarborough, who convinced President Kennedy that Army Special Forces possessed the capabilities he needed to combat Communist insurgencies; Sam Wilson, who helped convince Congress that it should create a U.S. Special Operations Command; and Barbwire Bob Kingston, who helped convince top-level decision-makers that Delta Force could provide the USA with much needed counterterrorism capabilities. Those great men all called me John and I called them by their first name, which is General.
    [Show full text]
  • Role Playing U.S. Special Operations Military Soldiers in the Modern Era a Monograph for the Basic Roleplaying System by Chaosium Inc
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS MANUAL Role Playing U.S. Special Operations Military Soldiers in the modern era A Monograph for the Basic RolePlaying System by Chaosium Inc. By Jason Graham and Stephen Baron No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from the author or publisher. 1 SPECIAL OPERATIONS MANUAL “We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.” This book is dedicated to the proud men and women of the U.S. Military 2 SPECIAL OPERATIONS MANUAL CONTENTS INTRODUCTION – 4 ARMY RANGERS – 6 ARMY SPECIAL FORCES – 8 NAVY SEALS – 10 MARINE CORPS MARSOC – 12 ARMY DELTA FORCE – 14 NAVY DEVGRU – 16 AIR FORCE PARARESCUE – 18 PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTOR – 20 CIA S.O.G. – 22 UNITS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES - 24 SKILLS – 28 OFFICER SCHOOL – 30 ARMOR – 31 EQUIPMENT – 32 WEAPONS – 33 CHARACTER SHEET - 34 MISSION BRIEFINGS – 36 SCENARIO SEEDS - 39 MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS – 40 RECOMMENDED READING – 46 RECOMMENDED VIEWING – 47 3 SPECIAL OPERATIONS MANUAL INTRODUCTION Special Operations soldiers are a unique the most realistic way possible within the breed. Determined, highly intelligent and confines of the BRP system. specially trained problem solvers who train This supplement is intended for an action constantly to risk their lives protecting oriented campaign where the extra weapons citizens who will never know who they are. and combat skills will be not only desirable These brave men, known as “Operators” do but essential. The characters outlined here not expect parades for their service, in fact, should be far above normal human they know that, should the worst happen, not characters in almost every aspect, combining even their loved ones will be given details of the physical prowess of Olympic level their final mission.
    [Show full text]
  • US Special Operations Forces (SOF)
    Order Code RS21048 Updated April 17, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Special Operations Forces (SOF) play a significant role in U.S. military operations and the Administration has given U.S. SOF forces greater responsibility for planning and conducting worldwide counterterrorism operations. The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) has called for a 15% increase in special operations forces beginning in FY2007. Proposals to elevate the command of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) and the realignment of civil affairs, psychological operations (psyops) and combat search and rescue (CSAR) functions out from under the control of the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), has raised concerns that SOF is perhaps becoming too focused on immediate versus long-term results. This report will be updated as events warrant. Background Overview. Special Operations Forces (SOF) are small, elite military units with special training and equipment that can infiltrate into hostile territory through land, sea, or air to conduct a variety of operations, many of them classified. SOF personnel undergo rigorous selection and lengthy, specialized training. The U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) oversees the training, doctrine, and equipping of all U.S. SOF units. Command Structures. In 1986 Congress (P.L. 99-661) expressed concern for the status of SOF within overall U.S. defense planning and passed measures to strengthen its position. These actions included the establishment of USSOCOM as a new unified command.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers in Berets the Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003
    Brothers in Berets The Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003 Forrest L. Marion, PhD Air Force History and Museums Program In Conjunction With Air Force Special Operations Command Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editors Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belinda Bazinet and Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Names: Marion, Forrest L., author. | Air University (U.S.). Press, publisher. | Curtis E. LeMay Center for Copy Editor Doctrine Development and Education, issuing body. Tammi Dacus Title: Brothers in berets : the evolution of Air Force Cover Art and Book Design Special Tactics, 1953-2003 / Forrest L. Marion Daniel Armstrong Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, Curtis E. LeMay Cen- Composition and Prepress Production Michele D. Harrell ter for Doctrine Development and Education, [2018]. | At head of title: Air University, Curtis E. LeMay Center Print Preparation and Distribution for Doctrine Development and Education. | Includes Diane Clark bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017059577| ISBN 9781585662784 | ISBN 158566278X Subjects: LCSH: United States. Air Force—Combat controllers—History. | United States. Air Force— Commando troops—History. | Special forces (Military science)—United States—History. | United States. Air Force Special Operations Command. Classification: LCC UG633 .M3144 2018 | DDC AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS 358.4131—dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:T 11
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4
    WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG WINTER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG From Satellite Tracking to Space Situational Awareness: Features The USAF and Space Surveillance 1957-2007 Rick W. Sturdevant 4 Precision Aerial Bombardment of Strategic Targets: Its Rise, Fall, and Resurrection Daniel L. Haulman 24 Operation Just Cause: An Air Power Perspective Stetson M. Siler 34 The P–51 Mustang: The Most Important Aircraft in History? Marshall L. Michel 46 Book Reviews The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 By Rick Atkinson Reviewed by Curtis H. O’Sullivan 58 The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 By Rick Atkinson Reviewed by Grant T. Weller 58 Gunning for the Red Baron By Leon Bennett Reviewed by Carl A. Christie 58 Clash of Eagles: USAAF 8th Air Force Bombers versus the Luftwafffe in World War II By Martin W. Bowman Reviewed by Anthony E. Wessel 59 Red Moon Rising: Sputnik and the Hidden Rivalries that Ignited the Space Race By Matthew Brzezinski Reviewed by J. Ron Davis 59 Danger Close: Tactical Air Controllers in Afghanistan and Iraq By Steve Call Reviewed by David J. Schepp 60 A Tale of Two Quagmires: Iraq, Vietnam, and the Hard Lessons of War By Kenneth J. Campbell Reviewed by John L. Cirafici 60 Risk and Exploration: Earth, Sea, and the Stars By Steven J. Dick & Keith L. Cowing, Eds. Reviewed by Steven Pomeroy 61 Under the Guns of the Red Baron: Von Richtofen’s Victories and Victims Fully Illustrated By Norman Franks, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small War in Panama
    A Small War in Panama The main Air Force contribution to Operation Just Cause was the airlift, which doubled the number of combat troops in the country. By John T. Correll n 1989, the United States decided “You could not buy Manuel Noriega, juries in Miami and Tampa, Fla., to take down the Noriega regime in but you could rent him,” said Gen. Colin indicted Noriega on 13 counts of Panama by military force. Manuel L. Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs violating US racketeering and drug Antonio Noriega had been dictator of Staff. laws. The indictments said he took Iof the country since 1983. Over the In addition to his moonlighting for the $4.6 million in payoffs for allowing the years, he had been on and off the CIA CIA, Noriega had side deals with Cuba, Colombian cartel to use Panamanian payroll, but that relationship soured as Libya, and other intelligence customers, ports and airports to ship cocaine to the his corruption, repression, and collusion and he allowed the Soviet KGB to oper- United States. In retaliation, the PDF in drug smuggling became too blatant ate freely in Panama. His ties with the intensified harassment of US military to ignore. Medellin drug cartel in Colombia were members and dependents in Panama. Noriega had risen in the service of close and of long standing. The United States had a stake in Panama’s previous dictator, Omar Torrijos, Noriega was ruthless in eliminating Panamanian affairs because of both who called him “my gangster.” the opposition. He ousted two elected the drug smuggling and continuing US Torrijos died in an airplane crash in Presidents when they resisted his will.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Operations
    Joint Publication 3-05 Special Operations 16 July 2014 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides overarching doctrine for special operations and the employment and support for special operations forces across the range of military operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the joint force commander from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the joint force commander deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the CJCS, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Koncepcja I Tworzenie JW GROM Jako Jednostki Sił Operacji Specjalnych
    BEZPIECZEŃSTWO SECURITY TEORIA I PRAKTYKA THEORY AND PRACTICE e-ISSN 2451-0718 2020 ISSN 1899-6264 Nr 2 (XXXIX) DOI: 10.34697/2451-0718-btip-2020-2-003 Received: 5.01.2020 Accepted: 22.04.2020 Hubert Królikowski prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński ORCID: 0000-0001-6617-1185 Koncepcja i tworzenie JW GROM jako jednostki sił operacji specjalnych Wprowadzenie W literaturze poświęconej jednostkom i siłom prowadzącym operacje specjalne można znaleźć kilka definicji, które je określają. W źródłach anglojęzycznych siły te są nazywane siłami operacji specjalnych (Special Operations Forces, SOF), czasem zamiennie siłami specjalnymi (Special Forces, SF), a w Polsce Wojskami Specjal- nymi1. Siłom operacji specjalnych stawiany jest szeroki zakres zadań, co wpływa na ich zróżnicowanie organizacyjne i różnorodność działań do jakich prowadzenia są przystosowane (od działań szturmowych, poprzez rozpoznanie, aż do działań psy- chologicznych). Same jednostki sił operacji specjalnych nie zawsze są ulokowane w strukturach wojskowych, czasami występują w żandarmerii, policji czy służbach specjalnych. Porównując i analizując definicje sił operacji specjalnych i samych operacji spe- cjalnych zawarte w dokumentach doktrynalnych Stanów Zjednoczonych i NATO2, można wskazać kilka ważnych elementów charakteryzujących siły specjalne. Są to: • wyznaczanie celów wynikających z polityki i strategii bezpieczeństwa państwa; • realizacja zadań krytycznych dla polityki i strategii bezpieczeństwa państwa; 1 W dalszej części artykułu będę używał tych terminów zamiennie. Należy jednak podkreślić, że w Stanach Zjednoczonych termin Special Operations Forces odnosi się do ogółu sił przeznaczonych do prowadzenia operacji specjalnych, a Special Forces to jednostki Wojsk Lądowych, tzw. Zielone Berety. Natomiast w Wielkiej Brytanii termin siły specjalne określa całość sił przeznaczonych do prowadzenia operacji specjalnych. 2 Allied Joint Doctrine for Special Operations AJP-3.5, 2009; Doctrine for Joint Special Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah B. Snyder Sarah B
    CREATING REQUIREMENTS: EMERGING MILITARY CAPABILITIES, CIVILIAN PREFERENCES, AND CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS By Alice Hunt Friend Submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In International Relations Chair: Sharon K. Weiner, Ph.D. Sarah B. Snyder Sarah B. Snyder, Ph.D. Kathleen H. Hicks, Ph.D. Dean of the School of International Service 3/20/2020 Date 2020 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 © COPYRIGHT by Alice Hunt Friend 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED To my compatriots, civilian and military. CREATING REQUIREMENTS: EMERGING MILITARY CAPABILITIES, CIVILIAN PREFERENCES, AND CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS BY Alice Hunt Friend ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the relationship between civilian and military preferences in the United States. A standard measure of the health of the civil-military relationship is whether civilian preferences prevail over military preferences in times of disagreement. Generally, the civil-military relations literature focuses on civilian efforts to impose their preferences on the military. But is it possible that the military is able to impose its preferences on civilians as well? This study asks and answers the questions: Does the military shape civilian preferences, and to what extent? If the military does shape civilian preferences, under what conditions does it do so? I contend that both purposeful actions by the military and factors natural to the civil-military relationship, each centered on the distribution of information resources, shape civilian preferences. I hypothesize that the less information civilians possess relative to the military, the more civilian preferences are based on military preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Operations Forces Reference Manual
    Special Operations Forces Reference Manual Fourth Edition The JSOU Press MacDill AFB, Florida June 2015 Prepared by Joint Special Operations University and the Center for Special Operations Studies and Research MacDill AFB, FL 33621 The Joint Special Operations University (JSOU). The Joint Special Operations University (JSOU) provides its publications to contribute toward expanding the body of knowledge about joint special operations. JSOU publications advance the insights and recom- mendations of national security professionals and the Special Operations Forces (SOF) students and leaders for consideration by the SOF community and defense leadership. JSOU is the educational component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. The JSOU mission is to educate SOF execu- tive, senior, and intermediate leaders and selected other national and international security decision-makers, both military and civilian, through teaching, outreach, and research in the science and art of joint special operations. JSOU provides education to the men and women of SOF and to those who enable the SOF mission in a joint and interagency environment. JSOU conducts research through its Center for Special Operations Studies and Research (CSOSR) where effort centers upon the USSOCOM mission: USSOCOM mission. Provide fully capable Special Operations Forces to defend the United States and its interests. Synchronize planning of global operations against terrorist networks. The CSOSR also provides teaching and curriculum support to Professional Military Education institutions—the staff colleges and war colleges. It advances SOF strategic influence by its interaction in academic, interagency, and United States military communities. The JSOU public Web page is located at https://jsou.socom.mil.
    [Show full text]