CITY OF JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
February 2019 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK One death or serious injury on our streets is one too many.
This plan was made possible with the contributions of the Task Force, community members, and consultant team. Photographs are provided by the City photographer, Jennifer Brown, the Pedestrian Enhancement Plan, Bike Master Plan, and Vision Zero project team.
Vision Zero is an ongoing effort. Additional information and updates will be made available on the Vision Zero website: www.visionzerojc.com
© 2019
1 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
LetterLetter fromfrom thethe MayorMayor
Dear Friends,
As one of the most densely populated cities in the nation, Jersey City is served by a robust multi-modal transportation network offering a variety of mobility options to our residents and visitors. We are proud of the investments we have made in our transportation network over the years to improve the daily experience of those who travel by foot, bike, car, transit, or other modes. Unfortunately, despite these investments, an average of 9 people are killed in traffic crashes in Jersey City every year.
In an effort to eliminate traffic fatalities, Jersey City became the first municipality in New Jersey to adopt the Vision Zero initiative with an executive order that I signed in February 2018. Our aim is to ultimately reduce traffic deaths and severe injuries on City streets to zero by 2026.
While we have always prioritized safety, Vision Zero marks a new approach to our transportation challenges and adds a renewed sense of urgency around safety. We established a 15-member Vision Zero Task Force that consists of representatives from various City divisions such as Engineering, Planning, and Health and Human Services, as well as the Jersey City Police and Fire Departments and local transportation safety advocacy organizations. Together, these dedicated groups and individuals have created a comprehensive plan to ensure safety for all roadway users and help us eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries.
A powerful, data-driven Action Plan can systematically address the risk factors that lead to lives being senselessly lost on our roads. Our mission, however, also demands education and encouragement to promote a culture of safety.
Since February, we’ve encouraged Jersey City residents to provide feedback via surveys, attend informational workshops about Vision Zero, and provide insight about how we can work together to prioritize ways to address traffic safety. As we move forward, we will continue to engage communities most affected by severe traffic crashes and advance strategic, context-sensitive improvements that incorporate education and police engagement in tandem with changes to street design and maintenance.
While Vision Zero is in its early stages, we have already embedded traffic safety measures in all design and operational decisions of routine maintenance and capital reconstruction projects. Our Action Plan aligns with and ties together Jersey City’s other planning efforts, such as the Bike Master Plan, Pedestrian Enhancement Plan, and School Travel Plan.
It is our duty to protect the lives of all residents, employees and visitors of our great city. To achieve our goal, we will continue to work together to make Vision Zero a reality.
Sincerely,
Steven M. Fulop Mayor
22 Vision Zero Pledge
Jersey City is committed to maintaining a transportation system that prioritizes safety, efficiency, and accessibility for all users. The Vision Zero Action Plan formalizes this commitment and outlines specific, data-driven steps we will take to reach the goal of zero traffic deaths and severe injuries on City streets by 2026.
On behalf of our respective departments and organizations, we commit to continuing our participation in the Task Force, embedding Vision Zero principles in City practices, and working together with all stakeholders to implement the changes necessary to achieve our Vision Zero goal.
Barkha R Patel (co-chair), Division of Planning Andrew Vischio (co-chair), Division of Traffic and Transportation
Paul Bellan-Boyer, Department of Health and Human Services Patrick Conlon, Bike JC
Jose Cunha, Division of Engineering Kara Hrabosky, Safe Streets JC
Hon. Rolando Lavarro, Municipal Council Chief Steven McGill, Fire Department
John McKinney, Law Department Mary Paretti, Division of Parking Enforcement
Brian Platt, Department of Administration Regina Robinson, Board of Education
Lt. Scott Schnee, Police Department Martin Valenti, Department of Public Works
3 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 5
Why Jersey City Needs Vision Zero 6 What is Vision Zero? 8 Where Are We Now? 10
High Injury Network 12 A Focus on Equity 16
Developing the Action Plan 20 Community Engagement 24 What We Heard 28
Our Plan of Action 30 Design Safer Streets 34 Promote a Culture of Safety 40 Embed Vision Zero in City Practices 45 Enforcement, Law, and Policy 48 Planning and Leveraging Data 50
Conclusion and Next Steps 52
4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary In February 2018, Mayor Fulop signed an Executive Order The themes, with examples of key strategies, are: acknowledging that the loss of life due to traffic crashes in 1. Design Safer Streets Jersey City is unacceptable and preventable. Almost 100 people have been killed in traffic crashes in the past decade; » Implement a broad traffic calming program over 200 have suffered life-changing injuries. Nearly one half » Prioritize major safety engineering projects on the of the fatal crash victims are pedestrians. High Injury Network » Increase the visibility of pedestrian crossings The City is committed to eliminating traffic fatalities and 2. Promote a Culture of Safety serious injuries in Jersey City by 2026. The Vision Zero Action Plan, developed by a multidisciplinary task force comprising » Establish Jersey City chapter of Families for Safe Streets 15 City agencies and community organizations, lays out the specific actions and strategies by which this ambitious » Conduct a public education campaign to change norms around traffic safety target will be met. » Reduce motor-vehicle miles traveled and promote The Action Plan establishes zero traffic deaths and serious alternatives, especially for short trips injuries as the guiding principle for all the City’s transportation 3. Embed Vision Zero in City Practices plans, policies, programs, and projects including ongoing » Establish a multidisciplinary Rapid Response Team initiatives such as the Bicycle Master Plan, Pedestrian to review every fatal crash Enhancement Plan, and corridor studies along critical » Develop a training program on Vision Zero for City thoroughfares such as Montgomery Street, Columbus Drive, staff and vehicle operators and Grand Street. » Ensure all City fleet vehicles have the latest crash Vision Zero also ushers in a new era of focused collaboration reduction equipment across City departments and the community to foster a 4. Enforcement, Law, and Policy stronger culture of safety in Jersey City, which in turn will » Evaluate City laws and ordinances for changes lead to a happier, healthier community for all. Equity is a key necessary to improve traffic safety component of the Action Plan — from data analysis focused » Develop a state legislative agenda to enable the on communities of concern, to targeted outreach in diverse City to promote roadway safety communities, to intentional strategy development that is » Develop a strategy for enforcement programs that cognizant of equity impacts. is equitable and transparent 5. Planning and Leveraging Data The Action Plan features more than 70 specific action items and strategies that have been developed by a multi-agency, » Develop a street design guide reflecting multidisciplinary task force using crash and demographic international best practices data together with extensive input from the community. » Update development regulations and design The action items are specific, measurable, action-oriented, standards to reflect Vision Zero principles relevant, and time-bound. They are tied to the elimination » Improve data collection and analysis of specific risk factors and contributing causes of fatal and Eliminating fatal and serious injury traffic crashes on Jersey serious injury traffic crashes, and they are focused on streets City streets by 2026 is ambitious but within reach. The comprising a High Injury Network developed for the plan. Action Plan and City High Injury Network are critical tools to The actions and strategies are organized around five themes achieving the challenging goal of Vision Zero and improving which cut across traditional agency boundaries and get to the quality of life in the City for all residents and visitors alike. the heart of eliminating fatal and serious injury crashes.
5
WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
What is Vision Zero? Vision Zero is a transportation safety philosophy that Fundamental Principles of was developed in Sweden in the late 1990s to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries in the transportation Vision Zero system. Vision Zero has proven to be successful across Europe and is now gaining momentum in These principles are core to major American Cities. successful Vision Zero efforts: A central tenet of Vision Zero is that people should 1. Traffic deaths and severe injuries are not be killed or seriously injured as a consequence acknowledged to be preventable. of mobility. Vision Zero recognizes that humans make mistakes and therefore the transportation system 2. Human life and health are must be designed to minimize the consequences of prioritized within all aspects of those mistakes. the transportation system.
In the past five years, cities across the U.S., including 3. Human error is inevitable, Jersey City, have adopted Vision Zero goals and and transportation systems developed plans to eliminate traffic deaths. Each should be forgiving. city has adapted the approach to their unique 4. Safety work should focus on circumstances and needs. Many cities have embraced system-level changes above equity as a key aspect of their Vision Zero efforts, influencing individual behavior. aiming to ensure that efforts to improve traffic safety do not have a negative impact on socio-economically 5. Mitigation of speed is recognized disadvantaged communities. and prioritized as the fundamental factor in crash severity. The federal government and most states have also (Source: Vision Zero Network) established a goal of eliminating traffic fatalities, providing additional support for this initiative.
VISION ZERO CITIES IN THE U.S.
Source: Vision Zero Network
8 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
Why Jersey City Needs Vision Zero In February 2018, Mayor Fulop signed an Executive Order acknowledging that the loss of life due to traffic crashes in Jersey City was both unacceptable and preventable. Nearly 100 people have been killed in traffic crashes during the past decade, and over 200 people have suffered life-changing injuries. Nearly one half of all fatal traffic crash victims every year are pedestrians.
The Vision Zero Executive Order commits the City With the support of the Mayor and City Council, the to eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries Action Plan defines specific, measurable, actionable, on Jersey City roadways by 2026. The Vision Zero relevant, and time-bound actions that the City’s Action Plan, developed by a multidisciplinary Task departments, school district, and local transportation Force comprising City agencies and community safety advocacy groups will carry out to achieve the organizations, lays out the specific actions and goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries on Jersey strategies by which we will meet this ambitious target. City’s streets by 2026.
The Action Plan establishes zero traffic deaths In addition to saving lives and preventing tragedies, the and serious injuries as the guiding principle for all actions and strategies in the Action Plan will have the the City’s transportation plans, policies, programs, significant additional benefit of creating a more livable and projects, moving forward. The City’s Pedestrian city in which walking, riding a bike, taking the bus or Enhancement Plan and Bicycle Master Plan, as well train, and driving a car, are safer and more enjoyable. as corridor studies along critical thoroughfares The Vision Zero approach reduces the danger and such as Montgomery Street, Columbus Drive, and stress of auto-dominated streets and neighborhoods. Grand Street, provide immediate opportunities to This is an appropriate strategy for a city with among demonstrate how the City is going to create a safe the highest levels of transit use, car-free households, system for all residents and visitors, regardless of and demand for biking and walking in the nation. their means of travel.
Vision Zero also ushers in a new era of focused collaboration across City departments and the community to achieve this important target. One of the primary goals of the Action Plan is to foster a stronger culture of traffic safety in Jersey City.
George Gonzalez, 11 Jermaine Active in sports, always Woodward Jr., 8 smiling, affectionately Jermaine Woodward Jr. was known as “Turtle.” He was a straight A student at P.S.14. on his way to school when He was in a bike lane outside hit and killed by a jitney bus while in a crosswalk his house on Bostwick Avenue on Kennedy Blvd. when struck and killed by a speeding hit and run driver. October 14, 2016 June 28, 2015 Photo courtesy of George’s mother, Judy Gonzalez. Photo courtesy of Jermaine Jr.’s father, Jermaine Woodward Sr.
9 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Where Are We Now? JERSEY CITY TRAFFIC CRASHES BETWEEN 2008 AND 2017 ALL ROADS CITY ROADS
MOTOR MOTOR 94% VEHICLE 91% VEHICLE 4% PEDESTRIAN 6% PEDESTRIAN 1% BICYCLE 2% BICYCLE ALL CRASHES ALL CRASHES <1% MOTORCYCLE 1% MOTORCYCLE
43% PEDESTRIAN 63% PEDESTRIAN MOTOR MOTOR 33% VEHICLE 17% VEHICLE 15% MOTORCYCLE 13% MOTORCYCLE FATAL CRASHESFATAL CRASHESFATAL 9% BICYCLE 7% BICYCLE
JERSEY CITY TRAFFIC CRASHES IN AN AVERAGE YEAR ALL ROADS CITY ROADS INVOLVED RESULTED IN INVOLVED RESULTED IN 20 SERIOUS INJURIES 9 DEATHS 13 SERIOUS INJURIES 3 DEATHS
10 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
Figure 1: Traffic Crashes in Jersey City
For an interactive version of thisLyndhurst map, Township North Bergen visit visionzerojc.com. Township Weehawken Township Union City Secaucus
Kearny Hoboken
Newark
Lincoln Park
New York City
Liberty State Park
2008 to 2017 Traffic CrashesCollisions Bayonne Moderate Bike- Fatal Serious Injury Ped Injury
LEGEND 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi Source: 2008-2017 NJDOT Crash Data, Safety Voyager, NJSP Fatal Accident Statistics
11 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
bicyclists, and motorcyclists are substantially High Injury Network more vulnerable and overrepresented in the On average, nine people every year lost their lives in most serious crashes. traffic crashes in Jersey City in the decade prior to the development of the Vision Zero Action Plan. Between 2. Over 40% of fatal and serious injury crashes 2008 and 2017, there were 88 fatal crashes resulting in each year occur on County and State roads, 92 deaths, of which 38 were pedestrians. In addition, including John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Paterson there were almost 200 serious injury crashes, nearly Plank Road, County Road, I-78, US 1&9, and NJ half of which involved a pedestrian. 440. State and County agencies are going to be essential partners in achieving Vision Zero in Figure 2 presents a detailed look at Jersey City’s recent Jersey City. traffic crash history reveals several significant facts:
»» Only 4% of all traffic crashes involve pedestrians but 43% of fatal crashes and nearly half of all serious injury crashes involve people on foot. Figure 2: Killed and Serious Injury Crashes, 2008 - 2017 »» Of the 72,000 motor vehicle to motor vehicle crashes, 86% resulted in property damage only and less than 0.1% were fatal crashes. »» Bicyclists and motorized two-wheelers each comprised 1% of all crashes but were involved in 9% and 15% of fatal crashes, respectively. Police-reported crashes (for all crashes where people were killed or seriously injured) were mapped and analyzed to identify the most dangerous streets in Jersey City. Street segments with a high incidence of fatal and serious injury crashes were combined to create a High Injury Network (HIN). The HIN is a critical tool for focusing the actions and strategies in the Vision Zero Action Plan.
Two versions of the HIN were generated: one that includes all roadways in the City regardless of jurisdication (All Roads) and one that includes only those maintained by the City (City Streets). The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) and Hudson County maintain highways and some major roads.
Two key takeaways emerged from the All Roads HIN shown in Figure 3:
1. Vision Zero has a singular focus on eliminating fatal and serious injury crashes. Crashes in which there are minor injuries or property damage only are unfortunate but the sheer volume of them often distracts from the solutions necessary to prevent the most serious collisions. Pedestrians,
12 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
Figure 3: All Roads High Injury Network
Lyndhurst 16% of road milesTownship North Bergen Township Weehawken 42 total road miles Township Union City Secaucus 68% of crashes County Rd 80% of fatal crashes Leonard St
Nelson Ave Tonnelle Ave P
Congress Sta
te o
rso
n Meadowlands n
P Terrace Ave P
l l
a a
n n
k
Zabriskie St k
R R
d d
Hancock Ave Kearny Liberty AveThe Webster Ave Hoboken Heights Central Ave Ferry St New York Ave Reservoir Ave
Tonnelle Ave
N Newark Broadway J
Newark A 13 ve 9 Sip Ave Journal Square Duncan AveUS 1 Trk e e v v A A in t i w Jersey Ave dl m a Marin Blvd m B u Lincoln Newark Ave
S Brunswick St Park MontgomeryAcademy St St W Side Ave Erie St Storms Ave 4th St CommunipawWest Ave Downtown 0 4 Clendenny AveSide 1st St 4 Columbus Dr
J N Bergen Ave Cornelison Ave Grand St Mallory Ave
Bergen- Johnston Ave r Warren St e Lafayette D Hudson St v A K L Union St y t Greenville d M Pacific Ave x Grove St e E New York n e
0 n pk City 4 4 e K T
4 y
F e e v s n r J Arlington Ave A Je N h F Ocean Ave Liberty o u ld w J e lt ie o f N State Park n r A a v e G d
R
n e rg e B d l O
Port Industrial Area
Bayonne High Injury Network on All Roads
Source: 2008-2017 NJDOT Crash Data, LEGEND 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi Safety Voyager, NJSP Fatal Accident Statistics
13 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
A Focus on City Streets
Because of the high percentage of crashes occurring on State and County roadways, the City undertook a separate analysis of crashes occurring exclusively on City streets. Figure 4 shows the jurisdiction of all roads in Jersey City. The resulting City Streets HIN (for Figure 4: Jurisdiction of Roads in Jersey City crashes that occur only on City-owned and operated Secaucus Road streets) presents a different picture.
County Road This does not mean that the City is either shifting responsibility to the County and State or allowing for Meadowlands ¤£1-9 any complacency to set in: there were still 30 fatal crashes and over 125 serious injury crashes on city streets during the past decade, which is still both The Heights unacceptable and preventable. Paterson Plank Road ¤£1-9 ST7
ST139 The City Streets HIN shown in Figure 5 contrasts with ¤£1-9 the All Roads HIN (Figure 3) in several important ways:
Truck Journal 78 ¤£1-9 Square »» Of the 31 deaths, 19 (61%) were pedestrians, Lincoln Park 2 were bicyclists, and 10 involved motorists/ West Side Downtown motorized two-wheelers, highlighting the greater
John F. Kennedy Boulevard vulnerability of non-motorized travelers on city 78 ST440 Bergen-Lafayette streets. »» Although there are fewer fatal crashes on city Liberty streets, they are more dispersed. (The All Roads State Park HIN captures 80% of fatal crashes on 16% of Greenville the total roadway network compared to 61% on 14% of the roadway network on the City HIN). Therefore, the actions and strategies adopted by ST440 the City are focused on system-wide changes as Jurisdiction of Roads ST440 Port in Jersey City well as on the HIN and crash hot spots. Industrial Area Jersey City »» The HIN changes when looking just at crashes on Hudson County City streets. For example, Cator, Lembeck, and State of New Jersey LEGEND Ocean Avenues in the Greenville neighborhood 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi are added to the City HIN while the nearby section of NJ 440 is removed. The solutions relevant to these local roads are very different from those on a major highway. Most importantly, the City HIN allows the City to immediately focus on the streets where it can affect change through the plans, policies, programs, and projects in the City’s control.
14 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
Figure 5: City Streets High Injury Network
Lyndhurst 14% of road milesTownship North Bergen Township Weehawken 31 total road miles Township New County Rd Union City Secaucus 55% of crashes
Leonard St 61% of fatal crashes Meadowlands
Nelson Ave
County Rd
Terrace Ave
Zabriskie StSummit Ave Webster Ave
The CentralHancock Ave Ave Kearny Liberty Ave Hoboken Heights Ferry St New York Ave Reservoir Ave
Newark BroadwayNewark Ave
e
v
Journal A Sip Ave t Square i m Baldwin Ave Duncan Ave m u S Jersey Ave
Marin Blvd Lincoln Newark Ave
Brunswick St Park W Side Ave Monmouth St Storms Ave 4th St Erie St Communipaw AveWest Wayne St Montgomery St Downtown Clendenny Ave Side 1st St Col umb Bergen Ave us D Monticello Ave r Grand St Mallory Ave Cornelison Ave
Bergen- Johnston Ave
Lafayette Warren St
Union St Hudson St Fulton Ave r D K L Pacific Ave Grove St Lembeck Ave M New York City
e Greenville v Arlington Ave Ocean Ave A Cator Ave Dwight St Liberty ld ie f State Park r a G
Ocean Ave
Old Bergen Rd
Port Industrial Area
Bayonne High Injury Network on City Streets
Source: 2008-2017 NJDOT Crash Data, LEGEND 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi Safety Voyager, NJSP Fatal Accident Statistics
15 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
non-white neighborhoods. These areas also have A Focus on Equity lower levels of drive-alone commuting and higher Like other Vision Zero cities, Jersey City has found transit use. We must approach traffic safety in the through the HIN analysis that some of the most context of intersecting social issues, employment, dangerous roads overlap with traditionally under- housing, and personal security, as these are often served and under-resourced neighborhoods. These more immediate concerns than traffic safety. neighborhoods are often called Communities of Concern (CoC). Three key takeaways emerge from this broader discussion: What is a Community of Concern? »» Conditions for walking and riding a bike lack safety and dignity because of the dominance of motor vehicles in the public realm and Places with the following characteristics decades of inequitable investment and public are classified as a Community of Concern: policy. Building safe streets for everyone can redress this imbalance and improve the quality 1. Minority concentration equal to or of life of all City residents. exceeding the regional threshold; or »» Design and engineering solutions are highly 2. Low-Income concentration equal to or effective in addressing traffic safety, and exceeding the regional threshold; or should be a priority throughout the City’s HIN. 3. Two or more Other Indicators An emphasis on street improvement projects of Disadvantage equal to or (e.g. installing traffic calming devices, protected exceed the regional threshold: bike infrastructure) in low income neighborhoods is one way to demonstrate a commitment to »» Female Head of Household equitable implementation. with Children »» Speed is a dominant risk factor for fatal and »» Persons with Limited serious crashes in Jersey City. Enforcement English Proficiency is an important component of speed; it was »» Carless Households also a frequent request from the public. Fear of »» Elderly Populations (75 crime and threats to personal security are also years and over) compelling issues affecting people’s behavior on the street. However, policing sometimes (Source: NJTPA Together North Jersey) comes with unintentional consequences; therefore, there must be a strong commitment The unique demographic and socioeconomic make- to sensitive, transparent, and non-discriminatory up of Jersey City requires a more nuanced approach, implementation. Moreover, enforcement should as more than 80% of the City falls within this official not supplant design and engineering priorities, CoC designation. This has significant implications for which have the additional benefit of encouraging the development and implementation of the Vision crime prevention through environmental design Zero Action Plan. (CPTED) principles. A deeper exploration of these links is needed as the Figure 6 shows all crashes in the City resulting Action Plan moves into implementation. Successful in a fatality, serious injury, or moderate injury of implementation of the Action Plan will require a more pedestrians and cyclists in the past decate on a map detailed analysis of the intersection between traffic of Communities of Concern. Traffic crashes within the danger, poverty, and other socioeconomic factors City correlate most closely with census blocks with in Jersey City, as well as an acute awareness of the elevated levels of poverty, and to densely populated, potential equity implications of all proposed actions.
16 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
Figure 6: Map of Communities of Concern and Traffic Crashes
Lyndhurst Township North Bergen Township Weehawken Township
New County Rd Union City Secaucus
Leonard St Meadowlands Poplar St £1-9 ¤ Nelson Ave County Rd Congress St
Terrace Ave
Cambridge Ave Zabriskie St Webster Ave
Central Ave
Hancock Ave Kearny Liberty Ave The Heights Hoboken Tonnelle Ave John F Kennedy Blvd
Ferry St Saint Pauls Ave New York Ave Reservoir Ave ¤£1-9 ST7 Newark Broadway 139 ¤£1-9 ST Oakland Ave
Newark Ave
Henderson St
Truck Journal 78 Duncan Ave Grove St Summit Ave 9th St ¤£1-9 Square Holland Tunnel Lincoln 8th St
Park Brunswick St Storms Ave 4th St Erie St Wayne St 3rd St West Side Downtown 1st St Morgan St Mallory Ave Communipaw Ave Bright St Monticello Ave JerseyYork Ave St Grand St Cornelison Ave Washington St W Side Ave Maple StJohnston Ave ST440 78 Bergen-Lafayette Warren St Union St Hudson St
Bergen Ave Pacific Ave New York Fulton Ave John F Kennedy Blvd City
Martin Luther King Jr Dr Arlington Ave
Danforth Ave Liberty
t Woodlawn Ave x State Park Greenville E e k p y T rse Je Romar Ave w Ne
Seaview Ave
Old Bergen Rd
ST440
ST440 Port 2008 to 2017 Traffic CrashesCollisions* Industrial Fatal Serious Injury OtherModerate Injury Bike- Area Ped Injury
Bayonne Communities of Concern LEGEND Source:Source: 2008-20172008-2017 NJDOTNJDOT CrashCrash Data,Data, SafetySafety Voyager,Voyager, NJSPNJSP FatalFatal AccidentAccident Statistics,Statistics, 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi USUS CensusCensus 20162016 ACSACS 5-Year5-Year EstimatesEstimates
17 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
A Focus on Increasing This is a huge advantage for safety, as traffic danger increases with the number of vehicle miles traveled. Walking, Biking, and Transit Walking and biking become safer as the percentage of trips made by these modes increases. Jersey City is less reliant on motor vehicles for everyday transportation than most communities in the United The benefits of lower car ownership to Vision Zero are States. More than one in three households have no threefold: access to a motor vehicle (38%), drive-alone commute rates are as low as 32%, and transit accounts for 48% 1. Establishing a goal of increasing walking, of commuter trips.1 Figures 7 and 8 depict percentage biking, and transit use can be an explicit Vision of residents who travel to work using transit and Zero strategy and is more achievable in Jersey percentage of carless households per census tract, City than in most communities because viable respectively. alternatives to motor vehicle use already exist.
Often, lack of access to a motor vehicle is seen as 2. The community may already understand, an indication of lower income status. While this may appreciate, and potentially support essential be true for some households in Jersey City, many safety measures related to traffic calming and households may choose not to own a motor vehicle improving infrastructure for walking, biking, and because transit and other alternatives are readily transit. available, dense land use patterns make it possible to 3. Reducing car use and better managing parking, walk or bike to many destinations, and the costs of car speed, distracted and/or impaired driving, and ownership and storage are high. improving street design for all users will enable 1 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates 2013-17 Jersey City to move quickly to eliminate fatal and
WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO serious traffic crashes from City streets by 2026.
Figure 7: FigureMap 7: Map of of Transit Transit Routes Use and Transit for Mode Travel Share to Work Figure 8: Map of Carless Households
Lyndhurst Lyndhurst North Bergen Township North Bergen Township Weehawken Township Weehawken Township Township Township
New County Rd Union City New County Rd Union City Secaucus Secaucus
Leonard St Leonard St Poplar St Meadowlands Poplar St Meadowlands £1-9 £1-9 ¤ Nelson Ave ¤ Nelson Ave County Rd Congress St County Rd Congress St
Terrace Ave Terrace Ave
Cambridge Ave Cambridge Ave Zabriskie St Zabriskie St Webster Ave Webster Ave Central Ave Central Ave Hancock Ave Hancock Ave Kearny Liberty Ave Kearny Liberty Ave Hoboken Hoboken John TheF Kennedy Blvd Heights The Heights Tonnelle Ave Tonnelle Ave John F Kennedy Blvd Ferry St Ferry St New York Ave New York Ave Saint Pauls Ave Saint Pauls Ave Reservoir Ave Reservoir Ave ¤£1-9 ¤£1-9 ST7 ST7 Newark Newark Broadway 139 Broadway 139 ST Oakland Ave ST Oakland Ave ¤£1-9 ¤£1-9 Hoboken Hoboken Newark Ave Journal Square Newark Ave Journal Square Terminal Terminal Transportation Center Transportation Center Henderson St Henderson St
Truck Journal 78 Truck Journal 78 Duncan Ave Grove St Duncan Ave Grove St Summit Ave 9th St Summit Ave 9th St ¤£1-9 ¤£1-9 Square Holland Tunnel Square Holland Tunnel 8th St Lincoln 8th St Lincoln
Brunswick St Brunswick St Park Park Storms Ave 4th St Erie St Storms Ave 4th St Erie St Wayne St 3rd St Wayne St 3rd St West Side West Side Downtown Downtown 1st St 1st St Morgan St Morgan St Mallory Ave Communipaw Ave Bright St Mallory Ave Communipaw Ave Bright St Monticello Ave Jersey Ave Monticello Ave JerseyYork Ave St York St Grand St Grand St Cornelison Ave Washington St Cornelison Ave Washington St W Side Ave W Side Ave Maple StJohnston Ave Maple StJohnston Ave 78 440 78 ST440 ST Bergen-Lafayette Warren St Bergen-Lafayette Warren St
Hudson St Union St Hudson St Union St
Bergen Ave Bergen Ave Pacific Ave New York Pacific Ave New York Fulton Ave Fulton Ave John F Kennedy Blvd John F Kennedy Blvd City City
Martin Luther King Jr Dr Arlington Ave Martin Luther King Jr Dr Arlington Ave Danforth Ave Liberty Danforth Ave Liberty
t Woodlawn Ave t State Park Woodlawn Ave x State Park Greenville x Greenville E E e e k k p Tp y T ey rse ers Je J Romar Ave w Romar Ave ew Ne N
Seaview Ave Seaview Ave Old Bergen Rd Old Bergen Rd
ST440 ST440 PATH Station NJTRANSIT PATH Station NJTRANSIT 440 Light Rail Line ST440 Light Rail Line ST Port NJTRANSIT Port NJTRANSIT Industrial Light Rail Station Bus Route Industrial Light Rail Station Bus Route Area Area Ferry Terminal Ferry Terminal
Bayonne % Workers who Take Transit to Work Bayonne % Households with No Vehicles Available
0% 51% 100% 0% 44% 79% LEGEND LEGEND
0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi 0¹/4 ¹/2 1 Mi Source: NJOIT, US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates
19 18 WHY JERSEY CITY NEEDS VISION ZERO
19
DEVELOPING THE ACTION PLAN DEVELOPING THE ACTION PLAN
21 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Developing the Action Plan The City established a Vision Zero Task Force to guide the development of the Action Plan through a 12-month process that included extensive public outreach. Three rounds of public meetings were supplemented by additional outreach activities at key stages of the process. Qualitative input from the community PROJECT TEAM STARTS was combined with a detailed analysis of ten years of crash JUNE 11, 2018 data to develop a detailed, data-driven Vision Zero Action Plan.
EXECUTIVE ORDER TASK FORCE MEETING PROJECT TEAM TASK FORCE MEETING FORMATION MARCH 13, 2018 JUNE 14, 2018
FEBRUARY 2018 MARCH 2018 APRIL 2018 MAY 2018 JUNE 2018
JULY 2018 AUGUST 2018 SEPTEMBER 2018 OCTOBER 2018
JUNE 24, 2018 AUGUST 7, 2018 SEPT 13, 2018 OCT 23, 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA & NATIONAL NIGHT OUT TASK FORCE MEETING INFO SESSION ONLINE SURVEY OUTREACH TABLES HANK GALLO CENTER LAUNCH
SEPT 15, 2018 ALL ABOUT DOWNTOWN OUTREACH TABLE
22 DEVELOPING THE ACTION PLAN
Vision Zero Task Force Members
»» Barkha R Patel (co-chair) – Division of City Planning »» Andrew Vischio (co-chair) – Division of Traffic & Transportation »» Paul Bellan-Boyer – Department of Health and Human Services »» Patrick Conlon – Bike JC »» Jose Cunha – Division of Engineering »» Kara Hrabosky – Safe Streets JC »» Hon. Rolando Lavarro – Municipal Council »» Chief Steven McGill – Fire Department »» John McKinney – Law Department »» Mary Paretti – Parking Enforcement »» Brian Platt – Department of Administration »» Regina Robinson – Board of Education »» Lt. Scott Schnee – Police Department »» John Thieroff – Mayor’s designee »» Martin Valenti – Department of Public Works
NOVEMBER 2018 DECEMBER 2018 JANUARY 2019 FEBRUARY 2019 ONGOING
NOV 26 & 27, 2018 DEC 13, 2018 JAN 17, 2019 FEB 2019 INFO SESSIONS TASK FORCE MEETING TASK FORCE MEETING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION BETHUNE/DICKINSON HS COMPLETION
DEC 2018 JAN 15, 2019 JAN 29, 2019 INTERCEPT SURVEYS INFO SESSION PUBLIC MEETING WEST SIDE/MLK/ NJCU JSQ/CENTRAL
23 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Community Engagement Reaching a Diverse Audience The Vision Zero Action Plan process included three rounds of public meetings and outreach events at key stages. Using various community engagement Introducing Vision Zero techniques, including online surveys, The first round of public meetings and outreach activities in-person meetings, information tables in the summer of 2018 were focused on introducing at public events, and pop-up surveys, the Vision Zero concept to the Jersey City community. the Vision Zero planning process Project team members participated in National Night Out gathered input from a diverse set of festivities, as well as the All About Downtown Street Fair, stakeholders. Specific efforts were made providing opportunities for people to learn more about the to reach traditionally underrepresented initiative and to offer their input. Staff were able to: members of the community by:
»» Answer questions about Vision Zero and related 1. Setting up information tables transportation planning and development activities; at existing public events throughout the city; »» Distribute informational postcards connecting 2. Coordinating pop-up surveys people to an online survey and interactive map; near multiple transit stops; »» Ask community members to share and prioritize 3. Providing children’s activities their traffic safety concerns; at public events and meetings so families with children could »» Hand out reflective stickers, answer FAQs; and more easily participate; » » Capture personal stories about traffic crashes and 4. Translating public engagement danger. materials into Arabic, Hindi, Spanish, and Tagalog; and A project website was established and the project team maintained an active social media presence throughout 5. Having a Spanish translator the process. Specific online campaigns were used to available at every public event, and a Hindi translator at most events. promote the outreach events and different project-related activities.
24 DEVELOPING THE ACTION PLAN
COMMUNITY ONLINE ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA 13EVENTS + 2SURVEYS + 1MAP + 3CHANNELS = >5400ENGAGEMENTS
Gathering Input In addition to the meetings, project staff hosted A second round of outreach activities in the fall four pop-up, in-person surveys near transit stops and winter of 2018 shared an analysis of crash and throughout the city. One-on-one conversations demographic data for Jersey City that informed the fostered discussions about real and perceived actions and strategies developed for the Action Plan. feelings of personal safety and traffic danger, and they provided another opportunity for people to share A series of four information sessions, including three comments about the Vision Zero initiative. focusing on the equity issues around traffic safety and crime, were hosted in different areas of the city. The sessions included an open-house style, interactive format to allow participants to review the analysis and provide their feedback and additional observations. Participants were invited to listen to a presentation by the equity expert on the consultant team and engage in a robust dialog with him, City staff, and other project team members to fully explore the complex issues around traffic safety and equity.
Meeting materials and the presentation were posted on the project website, along with a survey, to allow those unable to attend to provide input.
NATIONAL ALL NIGHT ABOUT OUT DOWNTOWN AUG 7, 2018 SEPT 15, 2018 LOCATIONS: 3 LOCATIONS: 1 RESPONDENTS: >100 RESPONDENTS: >100 ENGAGED: >250 ENGAGED: >250
INFORMATION SESSIONS INTERCEPT OCT 27, NOV 26 & 27, 2018, SURVEYS AND JAN 15, 2019 DEC 2018 LOCATIONS: 4 LOCATIONS: 4 RESPONDENTS: >50 RESPONDENTS: 100 ENGAGED: 100 ENGAGED: 125
25 JERSEY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Social Media and Online Summary SURVEY & MAP PUBLIC The project website and social media channels MEETING JAN 29 ,2019 provided a valuable platform for project updates and RESPONDENTS: 706 public feedback. RESPONDENTS: 25 MAP POINTS: 5645 The website also included a survey and interactive ENGAGED: 92 map that encouraged people to share information about their travel habits and experience on Jersey City streets. The map allowed stakeholders to place a pin in the precise location where they experienced ENGAGEMENTS: 2779 697 512 an issue or wanted to make an observation. Figure 9 shows the density of responses on the online survey and the locations of public outreach events held during the development of the Action Plan.
Figure 9: Map of Online Responses and Outreach Events From the Jersey City Vision Zero Webpage
Meadowlands ¤£
The Heights
¤£ ST