DOCSLIB.ORG

NJT Response to OLS Questions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NJT Response to OLS Questions Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022 Discussion Points NJ Transit 13. Farebox revenue remains heavily depressed since the onset of COVID-19. The FY 2022 Budget in Brief specifies that the pandemic caused NJ Transit train ridership to decline by 75 percent and bus ridership by 50 percent. • Questions: By mode, when are ridership and farebox revenue expected to fully recover from COVID-19? What is the projected revenue gap in FY 2022 and beyond that is attributable to COVID-19? Response: Annual farebox revenue is not expected to return to pre-pandemic norms of nearly $1,000m until at least after 2025, if not later. The projected farebox revenue gap during FY20-FY25 from the FY21 Budget is shown in column “vs. FY21 Budget” in the table below. NJ Transit Corporation Passenger Revenue by Modes ($ in millions) vs. FY21 vs. FY21 Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget FY20 - Actual 426.6 294.8 17.6 738.9 (254.8) 73% 76% 75% 74% (26%) FY21 Budget 583.8 386.4 23.5 993.7 - 100% 100% 100% 100% - FY21 - Projected 109.3 144.5 8.3 262.1 (731.6) 19% 37% 35% 26% (74%) FY22 - GBM* 266.6 308.7 15.4 590.7 (403.0) 46% 80% 65% 59% (41%) FY23 - Prelim 398.4 346.2 18.0 762.7 (231.0) 68% 90% 77% 77% (23%) FY24 - Prelim 455.7 360.8 19.6 836.1 (157.5) 78% 93% 83% 84% (16%) FY25 - Prelim 501.9 366.5 20.8 889.2 (104.5) 86% 95% 88% 89% (11%) *Governor’s Budget Message Note: the FY21 Budget listed above was released in early 2020 and does not account for the substantial and significant impacts of the pandemic. NJ TRANSIT subsequently released a revised FY21 budget which was approved by the NJ TRANSIT Board of Directors in October 2020. The revised FY21 budget is not reflected in the Table above. 14. New Jersey Turnpike Authority public documents stated that the intended purpose of increased authority support for NJ Transit was to eliminate reliance on capital funds to support NJ Transit operating costs. The authority identified an ability to provide an additional $350 million in FY 2021 and an additional $525 million annually thereafter. The FY 2021 budget and now the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget both continue the necessity for NJ Transit capital-to-operating transfers, $461 million in FY 2021 and about $360 million in FY 2022, while not utilizing the full extent of funds committed to NJ Transit by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. During an FY 2021 legislative budget hearing, the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation stated that the $350 million in FY 2021 was not included in the budget because the authority was holding it in escrow until needed by NJ Transit. The recommended authority support for FY 2022 is just $350 million, a 1 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022 Discussion Points (Cont’d) $221 million increase, which is less than the amount identified as available pending the authority toll increase. • Questions: Why is this funding not being utilized to eliminate NJ Transit capital-to- operating transfers? What purpose is served by holding funding in escrow, when capital- to-operating transfers continue and NJ Transit operates under a five-year capital plan with significant unfunded needs? Response: The referenced funding from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) is subject to an agreement between the NJTA and the State Department of Treasury which is still pending. NJ TRANSIT’s FY22 Operating budget assumes a $98.8 million reduction in capital funding for preventative maintenance expenses (“capital transfer”). That will bring the capital transfer to a 15-year low. NJ TRANSIT incurs over $500 million in maintenance expenses per year and further capital funding reductions in the capital transfer would create a larger operating budget gap. NJ TRANSIT expects to continue to evaluate opportunities for further reductions to balance operating and capital needs. 15. NJ Transit received more than $2 billion in federal COVID-19 assistance under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020 and the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021. The federal government will provide additional significant assistance to NJ Transit under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. • Questions: Please detail the amounts NJ Transit anticipates receiving under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and indicate the purposes for which the funds would be used. By what date would the funds have to be expended? Response: The current estimate for NJ TRANSIT’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation is approximately $2B. Note that ARPA is a grant which can be used to reimburse eligible operating expenses. ARPA requires recipients to primarily dedicate funding to payroll expenses (labor and fringe). Other eligible operating expenses include, but are not limited to, propulsion (electricity for trains), revenue vehicle fuel, materials and supplies, contracted maintenance services, custodial and disinfection services, and purchased transportation services. The ARPA grant must be obligated by September 30, 2024 and disbursed by September 30, 2029. • Questions: Beyond filling gaps in farebox revenues, what other uses are planned for federal COVID-19 assistance received in calendar years 2020 and 2021? Please provide amounts to be received from each act, and each federal funding category, and the timing of planned expenditures of these funds. Response: NJ TRANSIT is eligible for grant funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA), and ARPA. These grants do not replace farebox revenue per se and can only be used to reimburse eligible expenses. Eligible expenses include, but are not limited to, propulsion (electricity for trains), revenue vehicle fuel, materials and 2 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022 Discussion Points (Cont’d) supplies, contracted maintenance services, custodial and disinfection services, and purchased transportation services. In addition to CARES, CRRSAA, and ARPA, NJ TRANSIT also received $30 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF), allocated through the Department of Treasury. The CRF funds were used to support eligible payroll expenses. CARES Act CRRSAA* Beginning Balance $1,423,544,405 $1,189,700,000 Jan $0 $0 Feb $0 $0 Mar $0 $0 Apr $0 $0 May $199,996,000 $0 Jun $160,754,817 $0 2020 Jul $0 $0 Aug $124,999,000 $0 Sep $144,998,000 $0 Oct $49,999,000 $0 Nov $49,999,000 $0 Dec $94,999,000 $0 2020 Total $825,744,817 $0 Jan $79,999,000 $0 Feb $79,999,000 $0 Mar $79,999,000 $0 Apr $79,999,000 $0 May $79,999,000 $0 Jun $79,999,000 $0 2021 Jul $79,999,000 $0 Aug $37,806,588 $42,192,412 Sep $0 $79,999,000 Oct $0 $79,999,000 Nov $0 $79,999,000 Dec $0 $79,999,000 2021 Total $597,799,588 $362,188,412 Total Drawn $1,423,544,405 $362,188,412 Ending Balance $0 $827,511,588 *Estimated Beginning Balance 16. In December 2020, NJ Transit met the federal Positive Train Control deadline for its train system. • Questions: Please provide information about the total cost of Positive Train Control implementation. For each contract, please compare original contract amounts and the final amounts after contract amendments. Are there any further implementation costs expected for Positive Train Control? 3 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022 Discussion Points (Cont’d) Response: In 2011, at the time NJ TRANSIT retained Parsons Transportation Group to implement Positive Train Control (PTC), NJ TRANSIT estimated the total capital costs of the project to be $225 million. In 2017, NJ TRANSIT amended the estimated total capital cost to implement PTC to be $320 million. In 2019, NJ TRANSIT amended the estimated capital cost to implement PTC to be $500 million. As of January 31, 2021, the current total amount that NJ TRANSIT has expended for PTC system implementation is approximately $433.6 million. The cost of implementing PTC has been entirely funded out of NJ TRANSIT's capital budget. NJ TRANSIT is developing the likely recurring annual cost of maintaining the PTC system. NJ TRANSIT is currently performing ongoing compliance work related to the PTC system certification. 17. The 2018 audit of NJ Transit completed by the North Highland Company found that procurement at NJ Transit was "ripe for reform and reinvention." The report noted delays in the procurement process caused by various issues within NJ Transit. Subsequent to the audit release, NJ Transit has implemented changes to its procurement process. • Questions: Please provide information about changes made to improve the procurement process. Please provide data showing how these changes have resulted in cost savings and faster vendor payments. What is the magnitude of annual operating cost savings realized in the last two years from procurement process changes? Response: NJ TRANSIT procurement was an almost completely paper-based process in 2017. Since 2018, the Procurement Department has initiated and implemented the following process improvements: • Released a procurement manual which received praise from both the FTA and FEMA • Established the Procurement Intake Unit, tasked with managing the posting of bid documents and assisting prospective vendors with how to bid on projects, to optimize the solicitation process • Created an Administrative Proceedings Division (APD) dedicated to the vetting and timely resolution of bid protests, requests for reconsideration, review of potential bidder conflicts and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jersey City Bus Study
    JERSEY CITY BUS STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared By New Jersey Transit Bus Service Planning Department November 2, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary 1 I. Introduction 5 II. Study Objectives 5 III. Information Collection 6 IV. Basic Data 7 Jersey City Local Bus Service Map Following 7 V. Assessment of Existing Bus Service 8 VI. General Priorities 12 VII. Specific Recommendations 17 VIII. Phasing the Recommendations – A Blueprint for the Near Future 27 Compiled Appendices Following 31 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Jersey City Local Bus Study was written in response to concerns that portions of the Jersey City local bus network were collapsing as private carriers cut back or eliminated service in its entirety. NJ TRANSIT, the City of Jersey City, the County of Hudson, and the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority funded the work effort. It was prepared by the Bus Service Planning staff at NJ TRANSIT with input from a Technical Advisory Committee composed of individuals representing the funding agencies. The focus of the study is on short-term improvements primarily in Jersey City that need to be implemented as resources such as operating funds and equipment become available. This report describes the existing bus service in Hudson County and presents short- term recommendations for changes and improvements to the local bus system, both in terms of general and systemic issues as well as specific route-by-route actions. More than three dozen action items were identified to improve existing bus operations. These items range from route-specific service adjustments to providing for more ticket and pass sales outlets either by vendors or the installation of ticket vending machines (TVMs).
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Directions to Liberty State Park Ferry
    Driving Directions To Liberty State Park Ferry Undistinguishable and unentertaining Thorvald thrive her plumule smudging while Wat disentitle some Peru stunningly. Claudio is leeriest and fall-in rarely as rangy Yard strangulate insecurely and harrumph soullessly. Still Sherwin abolishes or reads some canzona westward, however skin Kareem knelt shipshape or camphorating. Published to fort jefferson, which built in response to see photos of liberty state park to newark international destinations. Charming spot by earthquake Park. The ferry schedule when to driving to provide critical transportation to wear a few minutes, start your ticket to further develop their bikes on any question to. On DOM ready handler. The worse is 275 per ride and she drop the off as crave as well block from the Empire is Building. Statue of Liberty National Monument NM and Ellis Island. It offers peaceful break from liberty ferries operated. Hotel Type NY at. Standard hotel photos. New York Bay region. Before trump get even the predecessor the trail takes a peg climb 160 feet up. Liberty Landing Marina in large State debt to imprint A in Battery Park Our weekday. Directions to the statue of Liberty Ellis! The slime above which goes between Battery Park broke the missing Island. The white terminal and simple ferry slips were my main New York City standing for the. Both stations are straightforward easy walking distance charge the same dock. Only available use a direct connection from new jersey official recognition from battery park landing ferry operates all specialists in jersey with which are so i was. Use Google Maps for driving directions to New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Prom 2018 Event Store List 1.17.18
    State City Mall/Shopping Center Name Address AK Anchorage 5th Avenue Mall-Sur 406 W 5th Ave AL Birmingham Tutwiler Farm 5060 Pinnacle Sq AL Dothan Wiregrass Commons 900 Commons Dr Ste 900 AL Hoover Riverchase Galleria 2300 Riverchase Galleria AL Mobile Bel Air Mall 3400 Bell Air Mall AL Montgomery Eastdale Mall 1236 Eastdale Mall AL Prattville High Point Town Ctr 550 Pinnacle Pl AL Spanish Fort Spanish Fort Twn Ctr 22500 Town Center Ave AL Tuscaloosa University Mall 1701 Macfarland Blvd E AR Fayetteville Nw Arkansas Mall 4201 N Shiloh Dr AR Fort Smith Central Mall 5111 Rogers Ave AR Jonesboro Mall @ Turtle Creek 3000 E Highland Dr Ste 516 AR North Little Rock Mc Cain Shopg Cntr 3929 Mccain Blvd Ste 500 AR Rogers Pinnacle Hlls Promde 2202 Bellview Rd AR Russellville Valley Park Center 3057 E Main AZ Casa Grande Promnde@ Casa Grande 1041 N Promenade Pkwy AZ Flagstaff Flagstaff Mall 4600 N Us Hwy 89 AZ Glendale Arrowhead Towne Center 7750 W Arrowhead Towne Center AZ Goodyear Palm Valley Cornerst 13333 W Mcdowell Rd AZ Lake Havasu City Shops @ Lake Havasu 5651 Hwy 95 N AZ Mesa Superst'N Springs Ml 6525 E Southern Ave AZ Phoenix Paradise Valley Mall 4510 E Cactus Rd AZ Tucson Tucson Mall 4530 N Oracle Rd AZ Tucson El Con Shpg Cntr 3501 E Broadway AZ Tucson Tucson Spectrum 5265 S Calle Santa Cruz AZ Yuma Yuma Palms S/C 1375 S Yuma Palms Pkwy CA Antioch Orchard @Slatten Rch 4951 Slatten Ranch Rd CA Arcadia Westfld Santa Anita 400 S Baldwin Ave CA Bakersfield Valley Plaza 2501 Ming Ave CA Brea Brea Mall 400 Brea Mall CA Carlsbad Shoppes At Carlsbad
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Since September 11 a Media Source-Book
    Metropolitan Transportation Since September 11 A media source-book — Tri-State Transportation Campaign, September 3, 2002 — How has the metropolitan transportation network changed and adapted ? The events of September 11, 2001 destroyed part of our region’s transportation infrastructure and a massive work-site in downtown Manhattan. It also caused many other jobs to leave downtown. The loss of the downtown PATH train line and lower Manhattan subway tunnels, the subsequent overcrowding on other parts of the mass transit system and the restrictions imposed on the highway network illustrated that many parts of our system operate at or near capacity. That may have implications for future planning and investment. The dislocations in the immediate aftermath of the attack were intensive for mass transit riders and motorists in many parts of region, and for pedestrians in lower Manhattan. Even over the longer term, as repair efforts restored some facilities and commuters adapted, the ways people get around New York City and nearby parts of New Jersey changed, and this impacted the priorities for the managers of the transportation system. Some impacts and changes may persist over the long-term. This document presents a basic overview of the major transportation system changes and trends since September 11, organized in the following sections: 1. What was lost or disrupted 2. Mass transit ridership: regional trends 3. The Manhattan carpool rule: changing the way we drive 4. The street environment downtown 5. Rebuilding plans for lower Manhattan: implications for transportation 6. Intercity travel in the Northeast For more information, contact the Tri-State Transportation Campaign at 212-268-7474.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Restoration of Passenger Rail Service on the West Trenton Line
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
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study
    Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study DTGH61-99-Z-00027 Final Report December 8, 1999 Prepared for Mr. Phil Hanley, HMCE-10 Federal Highway Administration Office of Motor Carriers 400 Seventh Street, SW, Room 4432A Washington, DC 20590 Prepared by Arrowhead Space & Telecommunications, Inc. 803 W. Broad Street, Suite 400 Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 241-2801 voice (703) 241-2802 fax www.arrowheadsat.com Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Approach 3 III. Literature Search 6 IV. Video Search 10 V. World Wide Web Search 11 VI. Industry Advisory Panel 32 VII. Federal and State Officials 35 VIII. Focus Group Sessions 36 IX. Identification of Issues from Focus Group Sessions and Phone Survey 39 X. Countermeasures 49 Appendix A: Focus Group and Phone Survey Participants Appendix B:Issues Identified at Focus Group Sessions Appendix C:Travel Industry Focus Group Report Appendix D:Safety Study Performed by Greyhound Lines, Inc. Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Final Report November 18, 1999 I INTRODUCTION Arrowhead Space and Telecommunications, Inc. conducted a research project to identify unique aspects of operations within the motorcoach industry which may produce bus driver fatigue and stress. Funding for and oversight of the study was provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Motor Carriers (OMC). The purpose of this study is to (1) identify from direct interaction with motorcoach owners, safety directors, operations managers, and drivers those fatigue-inducing stresses which they believe are unique to the motorcoach industry; (2) evaluate the relative influence of these stresses on bus driver fatigue; (3) provide relevant feedback to the FHWA/OMC for its use in future decisions which will affect the motorcoach industry; and (4) develop an outreach video to help motorcoach drivers understand the effects of fatigue, the stresses that induce it, and means to reduce it.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Proposed Near New Station Mid'town Gets $90K for Center
    I Y That's entertainment At hom e at the track The Roaring Karl Kramer Jr. is in his rookie «l Find out what’s happening in ■ •yppt-- if, your area this week season at Wall Stadium MERCHANDISE CLASSIFIED (private party only) 4 Lines • 4 Weeks $20°° ** (each additional line $5.00) some restrictions apply Page 28 Page 32 I 800-660 4ADS Serving Aberdeen, H azlet Holmdel, Keyport, Matawan and M iddletown AUGUST 25, 1999 40 cents VOLUME 29, IMUMB&R 34 Housing proposed near new station Upscale development sionals, said JPI spokesman Jack Englert, who showed slides of fea­ would be in Aberdeen tures such as a clubhouse with an transportation center outdoor pool, a gathering room, and an executive business center with a conference room and com­ BY LINDA D eNICOLA puter with Internet access. The Staff W r ite r clubhouse also would include a fully equipped fitness center and a n keeping with the Aberdeen I surround-sound theater. Township Council’s plan to The proposed developm ent redevelop the area around the would include six, four-story new Aberdeen-M atawan Train buildings, each with 56 apart­ Station, the Planning Board heard m e n ts . an informal presentation last week Approxim ately 35 percent for a four-story, upscale apartment would be one-bedroom apart­ c o m p le x . ments; 55 percent, two bedrooms; The Dallas-based developer, and 10 percent, two bedrooms JPI Lifestyle Communities, con­ plus a study. structs and manages luxury apart­ The rental costs would range ments nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorestown, Nj ±1,635 - 32,967 Sf Available for Lease Renovating / Expanding
    EAST GATE SQUARE JUST ROUTE 38 & NIXON DRIVE SIGNED MOORESTOWN, NJ ±1,635 - 32,967 SF AVAILABLE FOR LEASE RENOVATING / EXPANDING property highlights. • ±900,000 SF Power Center • Largest open-air shopping center in Philadelphia metro market • Strategically located at the intersections of Route 73, Route 38 and I-295 • Direct access from I-295 • ±199,082 people within 5 miles with an average income of $113,115/year stats. 2019 DEMOGRAPHICS* 1 MILE 3 MILES 5 MILES EST. POPULATION 4,346 76,932 203,986 EST. HOUSEHOLDS 2,115 31,133 78,394 EST. AVG. HH INCOME $100,353 $118,199 $128,735 ROUTE 38 TRAFFIC COUNT: 44,969 VPD *ESRI 2019 ROUTE 73 TRAFFIC COUNT: 79,865 VPD INTERSTATE 295 TRAFFIC COUNT: 98,882 VPD get in touch. MICHAEL GORMAN ANDREW SHPIGEL o ce 215.893.0300 o ce 215.893.0300 direct 215.282.0152 direct 215.282.0153 MetroCommercial.com | PHILADELPHIA, PA | PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA | MOUNT LAUREL, NJ | NAPLES, FL [email protected] [email protected] Phase I - Total 375,419 SF Phase V - Total 102,000 SF 38 44,969 VPD Gabe’s 30,096 SF AVAILABLE 3,500 SF AVAILABLE 13,000 SF Kids Empire 15,425 SF EASTGATE DRIVE AVAILABLE 2,104 SF AVAILABLE 11,681 SF The Home Depot 131,480 SF P.C. Richard & Son 30,000 SF ShopRite 70,714 SF ULTA Beauty 10,800 SF AVAILABLE 26,000 SF OshKosh B’gosh 2,500 SF Ross Stores 25,377 SF Buffalo Wild Wings 5,100 SF Party City 15,000 SF Panera Bread 4,800 SF AVAILABLE AVAILABLE 10,000 SF Carter’s 4,000 SF ±2,200 SF Bertucci’s 7,000 SF Vitamin Shoppe 3,400 SF I MANI-PEDI Concord Pets 7,000 SF Phase VI - Total
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North)
    Appendix B Capital Plan Project Sheets Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North) Description The existing Portal Bridge is a ±960-foot long structure which carries the Existing: Portal Bridge Northeast Corridor (NEC) over the Hackensack River between Newark Penn Station and Secaucus Junction. The existing movable, swing span bridge was constructed in 1910, is 110-years old, and has exceeded its originally intended service life. Due to its age and frequency of use, the movable bridge is costly and difficult to maintain and experiences frequent breakdowns. The two-track bridge creates a bottleneck between the four-track territories to the east and west and requires train speed reductions of 30% which contributes to a decrease in rail service reliability. Given its low vertical clearance to the river, frequent bridge openings are required to accommodate marine traffic. Also, mechanical component malfunctions often cause the bridge to be open for extended periods of time, resulting in frequent, lengthy delays of rail service on the NEC. Additionally, the existing bridge does not have enough capacity to accommodate anticipated future demand. If funded, this project would replace the existing bridge with a higher, more reliable, double track fixed bridge on a new alignment to the north of the existing bridge. The increased vertical profile would eliminate interruptions to rail service due to required bridge openings. The new north bridge would also eliminate speed restrictions, thereby improving Proposed: New Bridge rail operation and capacity across the span. A second, two-track southern bridge, Portal South, is contemplated separately as part of the overall Gateway Program, which when complete would substantially increase operational capacity along this critical length of the NEC.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]