Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points

NJ Transit

13. Farebox revenue remains heavily depressed since the onset of COVID-19. The FY 2022 Budget in Brief specifies that the pandemic caused NJ Transit train ridership to decline by 75 percent and bus ridership by 50 percent.

• Questions: By mode, when are ridership and farebox revenue expected to fully recover from COVID-19? What is the projected revenue gap in FY 2022 and beyond that is attributable to COVID-19?

Response: Annual farebox revenue is not expected to return to pre-pandemic norms of nearly $1,000m until at least after 2025, if not later. The projected farebox revenue gap during FY20-FY25 from the FY21 Budget is shown in column “vs. FY21 Budget” in the table below.

NJ Transit Corporation Passenger Revenue by Modes ($ in millions)

vs. FY21 vs. FY21 Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget

FY20 - Actual 426.6 294.8 17.6 738.9 (254.8) 73% 76% 75% 74% (26%) FY21 Budget 583.8 386.4 23.5 993.7 - 100% 100% 100% 100% - FY21 - Projected 109.3 144.5 8.3 262.1 (731.6) 19% 37% 35% 26% (74%) FY22 - GBM* 266.6 308.7 15.4 590.7 (403.0) 46% 80% 65% 59% (41%) FY23 - Prelim 398.4 346.2 18.0 762.7 (231.0) 68% 90% 77% 77% (23%) FY24 - Prelim 455.7 360.8 19.6 836.1 (157.5) 78% 93% 83% 84% (16%) FY25 - Prelim 501.9 366.5 20.8 889.2 (104.5) 86% 95% 88% 89% (11%) *Governor’s Budget Message

Note: the FY21 Budget listed above was released in early 2020 and does not account for the substantial and significant impacts of the pandemic. NJ TRANSIT subsequently released a revised FY21 budget which was approved by the NJ TRANSIT Board of Directors in October 2020. The revised FY21 budget is not reflected in the Table above.

14. New Jersey Turnpike Authority public documents stated that the intended purpose of increased authority support for NJ Transit was to eliminate reliance on capital funds to support NJ Transit operating costs. The authority identified an ability to provide an additional $350 million in FY 2021 and an additional $525 million annually thereafter. The FY 2021 budget and now the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget both continue the necessity for NJ Transit capital-to-operating transfers, $461 million in FY 2021 and about $360 million in FY 2022, while not utilizing the full extent of funds committed to NJ Transit by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. During an FY 2021 legislative budget hearing, the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation stated that the $350 million in FY 2021 was not included in the budget because the authority was holding it in escrow until needed by NJ Transit. The recommended authority support for FY 2022 is just $350 million, a

1 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

$221 million increase, which is less than the amount identified as available pending the authority toll increase.

• Questions: Why is this funding not being utilized to eliminate NJ Transit capital-to- operating transfers? What purpose is served by holding funding in escrow, when capital- to-operating transfers continue and NJ Transit operates under a five-year capital plan with significant unfunded needs?

Response: The referenced funding from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) is subject to an agreement between the NJTA and the State Department of Treasury which is still pending.

NJ TRANSIT’s FY22 Operating budget assumes a $98.8 million reduction in capital funding for preventative maintenance expenses (“capital transfer”). That will bring the capital transfer to a 15-year low. NJ TRANSIT incurs over $500 million in maintenance expenses per year and further capital funding reductions in the capital transfer would create a larger operating budget gap. NJ TRANSIT expects to continue to evaluate opportunities for further reductions to balance operating and capital needs.

15. NJ Transit received more than $2 billion in federal COVID-19 assistance under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020 and the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021. The federal government will provide additional significant assistance to NJ Transit under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

• Questions: Please detail the amounts NJ Transit anticipates receiving under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and indicate the purposes for which the funds would be used. By what date would the funds have to be expended?

Response: The current estimate for NJ TRANSIT’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation is approximately $2B. Note that ARPA is a grant which can be used to reimburse eligible operating expenses. ARPA requires recipients to primarily dedicate funding to payroll expenses (labor and fringe). Other eligible operating expenses include, but are not limited to, propulsion (electricity for trains), revenue vehicle fuel, materials and supplies, contracted maintenance services, custodial and disinfection services, and purchased transportation services. The ARPA grant must be obligated by September 30, 2024 and disbursed by September 30, 2029.

• Questions: Beyond filling gaps in farebox revenues, what other uses are planned for federal COVID-19 assistance received in calendar years 2020 and 2021? Please provide amounts to be received from each act, and each federal funding category, and the timing of planned expenditures of these funds.

Response: NJ TRANSIT is eligible for grant funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA), and ARPA. These grants do not replace farebox revenue per se and can only be used to reimburse eligible expenses. Eligible expenses include, but are not limited to, propulsion (electricity for trains), revenue vehicle fuel, materials and 2 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

supplies, contracted maintenance services, custodial and disinfection services, and purchased transportation services.

In addition to CARES, CRRSAA, and ARPA, NJ TRANSIT also received $30 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF), allocated through the Department of Treasury. The CRF funds were used to support eligible payroll expenses.

CARES Act CRRSAA* Beginning Balance $1,423,544,405 $1,189,700,000 Jan $0 $0 Feb $0 $0 Mar $0 $0 Apr $0 $0 May $199,996,000 $0 Jun $160,754,817 $0 2020 Jul $0 $0 Aug $124,999,000 $0 Sep $144,998,000 $0 Oct $49,999,000 $0 Nov $49,999,000 $0 Dec $94,999,000 $0 2020 Total $825,744,817 $0 Jan $79,999,000 $0 Feb $79,999,000 $0 Mar $79,999,000 $0 Apr $79,999,000 $0 May $79,999,000 $0 Jun $79,999,000 $0 2021 Jul $79,999,000 $0 Aug $37,806,588 $42,192,412 Sep $0 $79,999,000 Oct $0 $79,999,000 Nov $0 $79,999,000 Dec $0 $79,999,000 2021 Total $597,799,588 $362,188,412 Total Drawn $1,423,544,405 $362,188,412 Ending Balance $0 $827,511,588

*Estimated Beginning Balance

16. In December 2020, NJ Transit met the federal Positive Train Control deadline for its train system.

• Questions: Please provide information about the total cost of Positive Train Control implementation. For each contract, please compare original contract amounts and the final amounts after contract amendments. Are there any further implementation costs expected for Positive Train Control?

3 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Response: In 2011, at the time NJ TRANSIT retained Parsons Transportation Group to implement Positive Train Control (PTC), NJ TRANSIT estimated the total capital costs of the project to be $225 million. In 2017, NJ TRANSIT amended the estimated total capital cost to implement PTC to be $320 million. In 2019, NJ TRANSIT amended the estimated capital cost to implement PTC to be $500 million. As of January 31, 2021, the current total amount that NJ TRANSIT has expended for PTC system implementation is approximately $433.6 million. The cost of implementing PTC has been entirely funded out of NJ TRANSIT's capital budget. NJ TRANSIT is developing the likely recurring annual cost of maintaining the PTC system. NJ TRANSIT is currently performing ongoing compliance work related to the PTC system certification.

17. The 2018 audit of NJ Transit completed by the North Highland Company found that procurement at NJ Transit was "ripe for reform and reinvention." The report noted delays in the procurement process caused by various issues within NJ Transit. Subsequent to the audit release, NJ Transit has implemented changes to its procurement process.

• Questions: Please provide information about changes made to improve the procurement process. Please provide data showing how these changes have resulted in cost savings and faster vendor payments. What is the magnitude of annual operating cost savings realized in the last two years from procurement process changes?

Response: NJ TRANSIT procurement was an almost completely paper-based process in 2017. Since 2018, the Procurement Department has initiated and implemented the following process improvements:

• Released a procurement manual which received praise from both the FTA and FEMA • Established the Procurement Intake Unit, tasked with managing the posting of bid documents and assisting prospective vendors with how to bid on projects, to optimize the solicitation process • Created an Administrative Proceedings Division (APD) dedicated to the vetting and timely resolution of bid protests, requests for reconsideration, review of potential bidder conflicts and procurement training across the Corporation • Updated the terms and conditions on the Purchase Order to include federal provisions • Updated and created templates for various types of Federal and State funded procurements • Provided training and information sessions to the Business Units (BU) on statutory changes • Kicked off Partnership exercises with all parties in the Procurement process to discuss pain points and opportunities and in phase 2 to define, map and memorialize roles and responsibilities • Worked with IT and Records Holding to initiate and implement the Electronic Contract Management System (ECMS) to maintain paperless contract files and other legacy documents

4 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Began administering Invitations for Bids (IFBs) through the BID EXPRESS service for Construction and Goods & Services Procurements. • Began administering Requests for Proposals (RFPs) utilizing a Secure File Transfer Site (SFTS) via Microsoft OneDrive to provide a secure method for facilitating file transfers • Established performance goals for Procurement Department Employees • Worked with IT to add Oracle functionality for spare parts inventory and orders

Despite this progress, there is no immediate measure of magnitude of annual operating cost savings realized in the last two years from these initiatives. This is difficult to quantify until NJ TRANSIT has funding to procure and implement a fully functional Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system which will facilitate the entire Lifecyle contracting process from advertising to closeout. Performance metrics and efficiencies are being pursued despite these challenges but are subject to manual processes and human error.

18. Private bus carriers have experienced financial hardship during the pandemic. NJ Transit expressed concern that the structure of contracts with private bus carriers would prevent it from passing along any federal assistance to fill any revenue gaps experienced by these carriers.

• Question: Please provide an update on the status of providing federal assistance to private bus carriers that contract with NJ Transit and their eligibility for federal funds.

Response: NJ TRANSIT has funded all contracts with private carriers for Transportation Services throughout the pandemic and continue to do so. Federal rules did not allow private bus carriers, who only lease equipment from NJ TRANSIT (for $1 per year), to be eligible recipients or subrecipients under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act. NJ TRANSIT engaged with the New Jersey Federal Legislative Delegation and advocated for funding specific to the private bus carriers in future federal assistance legislation. The Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) provided two avenues of funding for private carriers. The first, in the form of the Coronavirus Economic Relief for Transportation Services (CERTS) Act established a $2 billion grant program, administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (in consultation with the U.S. Department of Transportation), was made available to Providers of Transportation Services for payroll costs. Private bus carriers are able to apply directly to the Department of Treasury to access these funds for their public routes and private charter services. The second method by which the private bus carriers may access federal funds was contained in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants text, where private carriers were eligible to become subrecipients of public entities (previously this was prohibited). NJ TRANSIT held multiple meetings with the Bus Association of New Jersey (BANJ) to review both avenues of funding and explain the requirements to become a subrecipient. Private bus carriers have to adhere to all federal terms and conditions other public entity subrecipients are subject to, which would fundamentally change the relationship between NJ TRANSIT and the private carriers. NJ TRANSIT is scheduling individual meetings with each private carrier to determine their interest in becoming a subrecipient of federal funds and review eligibility requirements. Even if the private carriers were to apply to become subrecipients of federal funds, there is no assurance that the funds received by NJ TRANSIT through CARES, CRRSAA, or ARPA would be sufficient to provide any further pass-through subsidy. 5 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

19. A whistleblower lawsuit accuses Academy Bus Lines, a private bus carrier, of defrauding NJ Transit by misreporting trips under its agreement with NJ Transit.

• Questions: Has NJ Transit audited Academy Bus Lines reports and confirmed the misreporting of trips? If so, what was the scale of the misrepresentations? What reimbursements and penalties is NJ Transit seeking?

Response: The scale and penalties are subject to the pending civil qui tam action. NJ TRANSIT is unable to comment on the Attorney General’s pending civil litigation.

• Question: Please explain the changes that are being made to ensure accurate oversight of contract carriers.

Response: o TECHNOLOGY ▪ In 2019, NJ TRANSIT began developing operational reports, through a technology solution known as Clever Devices, which automates the identification of contract carrier missed trips. NJ TRANSIT is leveraging emerging technology to provide reporting functionality that will identify full and partially missed trips. ▪ Private Carrier Affairs is in the process of implementing these reports for distribution to the contract carriers and the Private Carrier Administrators who oversee the agreements with the contract carriers.

o PROCESSES ▪ Private Carrier Affairs is developing processes to incorporate the Clever Devices Reporting into the business controls used during the review of contract carriers’ reported performance. ▪ Private Carrier Affairs is working directly with the carriers to improve Operator compliance with schedule adherence, Log-In requirements and communications with dispatch. ▪ Language has been developed and is now in review for improvements to the RFP and contractual requirements for procuring contract carrier bus service.

o PERSONNEL ▪ Private Carrier Affairs is in the process of adding additional personnel to assist in contract carrier monitoring oversight processes. These positions include: • Two Private Carrier Administrators – both have been hired and onboarded. • One Field Service Technician – In Process • Two Road Supervisors – In Process

6 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

20. P.L.2020, c.114 establishes a program to adopt paratransit best practices, requires greater coordination among paratransit service providers, and establishes regional paratransit coordinating councils. NJ Transit is to lead the development of a pilot program to provide paratransit best practices training, oversee regional coordinating councils, and redesign the Access Link program under a brokerage model. Access Link provides curb-to-curb transportation services for New Jersey residents with disabilities who are unable to use regular buses or trains.

• Questions: Please provide an update on the implementation of P.L.2020, c.114. Please identify the status of: the development of a brokerage model for Access Link Trip allocation; the development of a system of tracking Access Link trip requests to identify regular and recurring trips; the development of a contract structure for each Access Link service region providing a variable cost structure to fiscally accommodate the brokerage model; the selection of an agency to administer the best practices pilot program; the development of the best practices training module; and the establishment of the regional paratransit coordinating councils.

Response: NJ TRANSIT has undertaken several measures toward compliance with the S2517 legislation. The following outlines actions that have been taken or are underway:

1. Developed a $3M RFP for consulting support - a comprehensive study to assist Access Link in accommodating new NJ legislation S2517 2. Procured technology (Trapeze PASS) that will allow NJ TRANSIT to broker trips to interested third parties 3. Performed initial research of peer paratransit brokering systems and RFPs 4. Undergone an evaluation and consolidation of Access Link service requirements to determine eligibility of interested third parties 5. Performed a data exchange and process review with Mercer ARC 6. Provided a demonstration of Trapeze PASS to Mercer ARC 7. Review underway of internal system upgrades necessary to implement brokerage platform 8. Identifying necessary human resources to fully implement S2517 mandates 9. Soliciting input from Procurement regarding impact to current and future contracts 10. Access Link does track trips and is able to track regularly recurring (subscription) trips

21. NJ Advance Media drew attention to a 2018 audit report on the use of company vehicles that showed 84 percent of vehicle use was for personal commuting rather than agency business. The article stated that following the audit, internal policy was changed to strengthen the prohibition on using vehicles for personal business but was ambiguous about whether commuting was included under that prohibition.

• Questions: Under NJ Transit policy is an employee allowed to use a company vehicle for commuting to work? What oversight procedures are in place to ensure employee compliance with these policies?

Response: In accordance with NJ TRANSIT Policy 2.02 Non-Revenue Vehicles, assignment of non-revenue vehicles is limited to positions in which around the clock 7 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

vehicle assignment is critical to the employee performing his/her job or the assignment of the non-revenue vehicle is in the Corporation’s best interest.

That same policy allows for certain instances where the vehicle may be used by the assigned employee for personal commutation to/from work; this usage is subject to Federal IRS tax regulations.

NJ TRANSIT Policy 2.02 requires the department directors to ensure performance of the following oversight procedures:

• Inform their employees of the content of policy 2.02 and ensure compliance with same. • Ensure Monthly Vehicle Reports are turned in complete with signature within a five (5) day period after the month closes. Audit mileage and usage through GPS to ensure vehicles are being used for business purposes. Update vehicle assignment forms in a timely fashion. • Address vehicle issues such as violations, personal use, driver training, accident reports, monthly reports, etc., in a timely fashion. • Perform an annual review of vehicles assigned to the department along with mileage usage, vehicle assignments and a short description of primary duties assigned to employees to justify the number of vehicles assigned to the department. This review must be turned in to Fleet Services by Jan 31st for the period Jan 1st through Dec 31st of the previous year.

22. The National Transit Database Transit Summaries and Trends identifies a national average of 34.2 percent local funding for transit operating costs and 35.3 percent for transit capital costs. In the case of NJ Transit, local governments provide no operating support and only 2.3 percent of capital cost, per the 2019 Federal Transit Administration agency profile. Part of NJ Transit’s outlier status may owe to its organizational structure as a statewide agency when most other transit agencies in the country are local or regional.

• Questions: Has NJ Transit engaged in any work with localities to develop local service models that could increase local funding of transit service? If the Legislature were to look at statutory measures that would require local financial support for transit, what types of revenues would work best with the existing governance and organizational structure of NJ Transit?

Response: NJ TRANSIT has not identified any models that could increase local funding of transit service, but we do have new initiatives for increasing county-provided service for Seniors and People with Disabilities. Currently we have our Transportation Network Company (TNC) challenge grant that 4 Counties are participating in, where NJ TRANSIT provides a small per-trip subsidy when a requested trip is fulfilled by a TNC. The county transit service provides matching funds to the cost of the trip. The NJ TRANSIT funds for the pilot are currently being funded through the NJ TRANSIT portion of the casino revenue program. We also are currently conducting a micro-mobility study to explore methods and help design a service that can assist our counties to provide expanded community- based transportation services. Many current federal and state funded programs that NJ TRANSIT administers have restrictions such as population served and/or service area; 8 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

require county, municipal, or non-profit subrecipients to provide matching funds; and are currently fully programmed.

NJ TRANSIT is currently structured to work with counties and local municipalities to pass through funding for locally provisioned services.

If the Legislature were to look at statutory measures that would require local financial support for transit, what types of revenues would work best with the existing governance and organizational structure of NJ Transit?

Response: The potential benefits of value capture, particularly as they related to Transit- Oriented Development, could work well within NJ TRANSIT’s existing governance and organizational structure.

A framework requiring such collaboration between NJ TRANSIT and private developers would require legislation. Without this type of legislation, NJ TRANSIT must negotiate all TOD projects with each potential private developer. Value capture and special assessment authority currently occur at the municipal level. The State has never imposed a state-wide mechanism to capture the value of real estate development in proximity to NJ TRANSIT assets.

Because NJ TRANSIT does not have authority to set taxes or issues bonds, it would need to partner with a municipality, County or State agency for financing and revenue collection. This method is highly inefficient and has been profoundly difficult, because of the nature of having multiple taxing districts make a decision, in concert, to impose a property tax surcharge on certain property owners. Without a mechanism to solve this concrete reality, it will be impossible to finance the improvements to NJ TRANSIT assets required by public demand.

Creating a special assessment like a Transit Improvement District (“TID”) for the entire system, or a regulatory framework mandating collection of property taxes for the TID, will require amendments to existing law. Transit agencies across the country have found that the provision of a predictable and dedicated funding source that is less subject to yearly vagaries will allow for the long-term, data-driven strategic planning and coordination needed for successful commercial partnerships with the private development community. Indeed, the Senate Oversight Committee was presented in 2016 with comparators across the industry and NJ TRANSIT was identified as an outlier.

23. NJ Transit borrows against its annual appropriation of capital funds in various ways, primarily through borrowing arrangements with the Economic Development Authority, meaning that a portion of annual capital appropriations are consumed each year by debt service and are not available to fund new NJ Transit projects.

• Questions: Please identify: a) the current debt service schedule for NJ Transit borrowing, including Certificates of Participation, New Jersey Economic Development Authority project bonds, Portal Bridge bonds, and any other borrowing with an annual debt service payment that relies upon capital funding sources; and b) the capital program lines that comprise these payments. 9 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Response:

A) Please see the below table summarizing the current debt service schedule for NJ TRANSIT borrowing to pay for long-lived assets. The weighted maturity of NJ TRANSIT’s borrowing is matched to the expected life of the assets. Please note the Portal North Bridge bonds are not included as the bonds have not yet been issued.

NJ TRANSIT CORPORATION Annual Debt Service Total Debt FY NJEDA GANs Service FY21 $85,389,775 $72,167,125 $157,556,900 FY22 $85,388,775 $70,432,875 $155,821,650 FY23 $97,021,450 $97,021,450 FY24 $108,648,625 $108,648,625 FY25 $108,650,625 $108,650,625 FY26 $108,649,125 $108,649,125 FY27 $108,649,500 $108,649,500 FY28 $92,635,050 $92,635,050 FY29 $23,262,350 $23,262,350 FY30 $44,029,850 $44,029,850 FY31 $44,027,600 $44,027,600 FY32 $44,029,350 $44,029,350 FY33 $44,027,225 $44,027,225 FY34 $44,028,225 $44,028,225 FY35 $44,029,100 $44,029,100 FY36 $44,026,600 $44,026,600 FY37 $44,027,225 $44,027,225 FY38 $44,029,300 $44,029,300 FY39 $44,028,900 $44,028,900 FY40 $44,025,900 $44,025,900 FY41 $44,030,250 $44,030,250 FY42 $44,027,600 $44,027,600 FY43 $44,029,225 $44,029,225 FY44 $44,029,900 $44,029,900 FY45 $44,026,025 $44,026,025

B): • Rail Rolling Stock Procurement DB #T112 – Dual Powers/Electric Loco/Multi-Level Coach • Transit Rail Initiatives DB #T300 – Long Slip/Traction Power/Bus AVL/Cruiser Bus/Dual Power

24. NJ Transit’s June 2020 unconstrained five-year capital plan identifies a capital funding need through FY 2025 of nearly $17 billion, and expected funding sources of just over $11 billion, for a $5.77 billion funding gap. Since the publication of the five-year capital plan, there has been no

10 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

increase for NJ Transit in Transportation Trust Fund appropriations and other State support, although federal grants may augment NJ Transit capital funding.

• Questions: What is the current capital funding gap through FY 2025 based on the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget? Have any potential funding sources been identified to close this gap?

Response: Please refer to the below table summarizing NJ TRANSIT’s capital funding needs as it relates to its FY2021 – 2025 capital plan. Since the development of NJ TRANSIT: A Five-Year Capital Plan in June 2020, very limited additional funding has been identified to advance critical capital initiatives. The Proposed FY22 Governor’s Budget and FY23 Preliminary Budget include a $98.8m reduction to the capital funding used for capitally- eligible Preventative Maintenance expenses, thereby increasing available funding for currently unfunded projects in the Capital Plan by a comparable amount. That increase is not reflected in the Five-Year Capital Plan table below. NJ TRANSIT remains in close contact with our federal partners as the current administration advances its goals for transportation infrastructure. NJ TRANSIT looks forward to this renewed attention to transportation infrastructure, which may lead to potential discretionary and formula- based funding opportunities.

25. NJ Transit has a large number of projects in its capital pipeline and not all of them are reflected in the annual capital program. Some are partially funded under previous annual capital programs and some have not yet been funded but have been identified in the five-year capital program or planning documents.

11 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Questions: For each of the following capital projects please identify: a) the date when planning and development began, b) the amount of capital funds appropriated to date, c) the amount of capital funds expended to date, d) the amount of capital funds that still needs to be appropriated to complete construction, e) whether existing future funding sources have been identified for the project (including the year of funding, if applicable), and f) anticipated project completion dates:

Each Sandy Resiliency Program Project Electrification of the Bus Fleet Elizabeth Train Station Newark Penn Station Walter Rand Station Lyndhurst Station Perth Amboy Station Northern Bus Garage Portal Bridge New Brunswick Transit Service (BRT/Light Rail/etc.) Route 1 BRT Camden-Glassboro Rail Line Hudson-Bergen Northern Branch Hudson-Bergen Rt. 440 Expansion Lackawana Cutoff MOS Project Rail Extension to Phillipsburg Meadowlands capacity expansion project/design competition – Booton Transit Way Raritan River Bridge Replacement Mid-Line Loop North Brunswick Station Hunter Flyover Delco Lead County Yard Expansion Passenger service on the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway east of Hawthorne New York Penn Station Improvements

Response: The projects listed represent the agency’s vision and is fiscally unconstrained. The detailed information requested does not currently exist for each project listed. NJ TRANSIT is in the process of compiling and confirming information for those projects where it is available.

26. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government has awarded several billions of dollars to the State of New Jersey.

• Question: What are NJ Transit’s plans to maximize federal financial assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic and as the State recovers therefrom?

Response: NJ TRANSIT has tracked all costs related to our COVID-19 response and are submitting Project Worksheets to FEMA for eligible expenses. Additionally, NJ TRANSIT 12 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

continues to track eligible expenses for reimbursement under the CARES Act and is in the process of negotiating final CRRSAA and ARPA allocations with NY and CT. NJ TRANSIT has also utilized Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) allocated through the Department of the Treasury to support eligible payroll expenses. To the extent that there is discretionary funding available under those grants, NJ TRANSIT intends to pursue available funds, provided that it has met relevant eligibility criteria and has eligible expenses.

27. Many federal agencies and departments have waived certain requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

• Questions: What, if any, federal waivers has NJ Transit applied for during the COVID-19 pandemic? What waiver requests were approved and what waiver requests were denied? How many of these waivers have an opportunity to be extended?

Response: NJ TRANSIT on its own behalf, and as a member of the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) applied for and received a series of waivers from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The current waivers are set to expire September 18, 2021, or three months after the FRA Administrator’s rescission of the existing Emergency Declaration related to the COVID-19 public health emergency. Waiver requests, responses by FRA and extensions can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FRA-2020-0002/document. NJ TRANSIT has not utilized any waivers authorized by the FRA.

28. Diversity and inclusion in the workplace rose to prominence as a mainstream topic of interest in 2020.

• Questions: Please indicate the percentages of minorities and women in each of NJ Transit's middle and senior management. Please detail any plans the agency may have to increase the representation of minorities and women among its middle and senior managers.

Response: Please see percentages shown in the table below. Efforts to increase representation of minorities and women are discussed in the response to the second bullet of this question.

Women Minorities # % # % Sr. Mngmt 4 22% 8 44% Mid. Mngmt 169 29% 216 37%

• Questions: Please indicate any structures and elements of its culture that are known to NJ Transit as having had the effects of making minorities and women feel unwelcome and limiting diversity and inclusion. How does NJ Transit intend to address these structures and cultural elements? What initiatives has NJ Transit implemented in the last

13 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

two years to further the diversity and inclusiveness of its workplace? Does NJ Transit intend to undertake any additional initiatives through the end of FY 2022?

Please indicate any structures and elements of its culture that are known to NJ TRANSIT as having had the effects of making minorities and women feel unwelcome and limiting diversity and inclusion. Response: NJ TRANSIT has a zero-tolerance policy toward discrimination. Pursuant to requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation, NJ TRANSIT has prepared and submitted an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)/Affirmative Action (AA) Plan that includes analysis of critical talent management areas such as recruitment, promotion, and compensation, to ensure there is equity in these work-related processes. NJ TRANSIT is unaware of any structures and elements of its culture that are known as having had the effects of making minorities and women feel unwelcome and limiting diversity and inclusion. In informal conversations, minority (particularly Black) and women employees have shared concerns and requests for more information about: • Promotional / Career advancement opportunities and support • Efforts to provide coaching and mentoring support for employee development • Efforts to ensure compensation is equitable

How does NJ Transit intend to address these structures and cultural elements? NJ TRANSIT’s Human Resources, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity Programs (OCRDP), and the Office of EEO/AA work closely to ensure information about NJ TRANSIT’s talent management and development processes, including compensation, are widely disseminated and transparent. In Summer of 2020, NJ TRANSIT launched a new training program titled “Supervisor Superstars” with the goal of providing supervisors with information critical to their success, and the success of the teams they lead, developed especially for this audience. The Supervisors Superstars curriculum covers an array of organizational and talent management practices, including but not limited to “Managing Performance,” hiring and Interviewing skills, and “Diversity and Inclusion.” In addition, NJ TRANSIT has promoted information and awareness regarding the requirements of the Equal Pay Act which ensures equitable compensation, and the availability of venues like the Office of EEO/AA to address complaints of alleged pay inequity, through multiple internal channels. NJ TRANSIT’s main effort to further diversity and inclusiveness in the workplace is its “NJT2030 Diversity and Inclusion Initiative.”

What initiatives has NJ Transit implemented in the last two years to further the diversity and inclusiveness of its workplace? Does NJ Transit intend to undertake any additional initiatives through the end of FY 2022? On October 26, 2020, NJ TRANSIT launched its NJT2030 Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) Initiative; a framework for how NJ TRANSIT will utilize the positive power of D&I to achieve corporate goals and realize the bold vision laid out in the NJT2030 Strategic Plan. NJ TRANSIT defines “Diversity” as the range of individual and group characteristics, identities, and cultures, that make up who we are as human beings and inform how we interact with each other. NJ TRANSIT’s D&I initiative prioritizes for attention those aspects of diversity where groups 14 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

historically have been marginalized, under-represented and faced discrimination; for example, race, gender identity and/or disability. However, the initiative acknowledges that diversity represents the full spectrum of differences and similarities that can be found in all human beings. Diversity includes intrinsic, extrinsic, and organizational dimensions of who we are as people, as well as our personal and professional relationships. NJ TRANSIT defines “Inclusion” as the active involvement and empowerment of all individuals, groups and cultures in a way that cultivates a sense and experience of belonging, unity and community. Inclusion is one of NJ TRANSIT’s core values, and speaks to the organization’s ongoing efforts to ensure people who engage with any NJ TRANSIT program, service, communication and/or employee, experience being welcomed, accepted, respected, valued, and encouraged to fully participate in/treated as full partners of, our organization. NJ TRANSIT’s NJT2030 D&I Initiative goal is to drive inclusion across all aspects of diversity for four key constituencies of the business: • Customers • Business partners • Community Partners • Employees NJ TRANSIT will do this internally and externally by focusing on five major domains: • Education – Fostering learning about the many ways D&I affects NJ TRANSIT programs and services • Cross-Functional Networks – Bringing employees together outside of their daily business units to drive innovation and inclusion, including the creation of: o Company / Employee Resource Groups (CERGs) o A corporate “Inclusion Council” • “3P Culture Shift” – Using inclusion principles and best practices to shift organizational policies procedures and practices • Branding & Communication – Producing marketing and messaging with an inclusive lens • Events and Programming – Developing occasions/experiences that provide opportunities to learn about and celebrate diversity To support the education focus, OCRDP partnered with Human Resources in the development of the D&I course for the “Supervisor Superstars” program and is currently partnering to incorporate D&I elements into the next level program, “Lessons in Leadership”, due to be released in Spring 2021. In January 2021, Human Resources launched an “Unconscious Bias” training program for supervisors. OCRDP is working to develop a follow-up level two unconscious bias training program for supervisors focused on the link between unconscious bias and recruiting. NJ TRANSIT is also developing e-learning training on various topics within D&I for all employees, scheduled for release in the latter half of 2021. On November 17, 2020 NJ TRANSIT launched a pilot CERG focused on the Black/African American community. Since forming this CERG has held internal virtual events for Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Black History Month, both of which received record attendance for internal NJ TRANSIT events overwhelmingly positive feedback. The CERG is currently working with Human Resources to develop a “Tools for Success” series, to address the employee development concerns shared

15 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

above. NJ TRANSIT’s rollout of the full CERG Program will occur on April 20, 2021, and the Inclusion Council is anticipated to launch by Summer 2021. Beginning in January 2021, OCRDP and Marketing have partnered on incorporating D&I best practices into NJ TRANSIT branding and marketing efforts, resulting in an internal celebration campaign focused on federally designated months, and ongoing consideration of branding opportunities for internal and external D&I focused events. NJ TRANSIT’s efforts to incorporate D&I best practices into all NJ TRANSIT’s policies, procedures, and practices to support cultural shift is underway, with an initial focus on elements of talent management and development. All NJT2030 D&I Initiative elements are expected to proceed through and beyond FY2022.

29. Please provide the following data and information:

A) A list of ridership levels, farebox recovery ratios, and passenger growth rates for each bus route, rail line, and light rail line for FY 2018 through FY 2021 (projected full year)

Response: Please see Appendix A “Question 29.A NJT – System Ridership by Lines FY18- 21”

B) A breakdown of individual capital program lines and other sources that comprise the “Other Reimbursements” line on page D-368 of the FY 2022 Governor’s Budget

Response: Capital Program funding included in “Other Reimbursements” include expenditures for Rail and Bus infrastructure preventive maintenance. For a listing of this funding as well as other sources included in “Other Reimbursements” please see table below.

FY22 - Other Reimbursements ($ millions)

Fund Source FY22

NJ Turnpike Funding $ 325.00 NJ Clean Energy Fund 82.1 NJ Casino Revenue 22.6 Federal Grants 31.5 State/Local Grants 103.0 Preventive Maint. Rail 249.3 Preventive Maint. Bus 112.7 CARES Act 18.4 CRRSA Act 937.0 Other 10.2 Total $ 1,891.80

16 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

C) A breakdown of individual capital program lines and amounts that comprise FY 2021 and FY 2022 salary and overhead. Please see tables, below

• Preventive Maintenance – Bus (T135) • Preventive Maintenance – Rail (T39) • Rail Capital Maintenance (T34)

Federal Preventive Maintenance

Rail - (T39) FY21 Proj. FY22 Proj. Account

Labor 83,791,707 94,543,630 Fringe Benefits 69,362,380 78,262,771 Overhead 67,820,994 76,523,599 Total Rail PM $ 220,975,081 $ 249,330,000

Bus - (T135)

FY21 Proj. FY22 Proj. Account

Labor 53,918,825 43,079,272 Fringe Benefits 43,488,979 34,746,187 Overhead 43,637,114 34,864,541 Total Bus PM $ 141,044,919 $ 112,690,000

Bus and Rail FY21 Proj. FY21 Proj. Account CAP = $362M CAP = $362M

Labor 137,710,533 137,622,902 Fringe Benefits 112,851,359 113,008,958 Overhead 111,458,108 111,388,140 Total Bus and Rail PM $ 362,020,000 $ 362,020,000

Notes: 1. FY21 and FY22 Rail PM appropriation = $249.33M Estimated spending = $220.98M 2. FY21 Bus PM appropriation = $112.69M. Estimated spending = $141.04M

17 Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

TTF - Rail Capital Maintenance

Rail - (T34)

FY21 Proj. FY22 Proj. Account

Labor 23,111,665 - Fringe Benefits 19,045,889 - Overhead 18,716,426 - Non-Labor Accounts 37,926,020 - Total Rail TTF Cap. Maint. $ 98,800,000 $ -

Notes: 1. For FY22, we are projecting to eliminate the TTF Cap-to-Op. transfer that was $98.8M for FY21.

D) A breakdown of individual capital program lines and amounts that comprise FY 2021 and FY 2022 permitted maintenance.

The below provides the three capital program lines that are used to disclose preventive maintenance. For FY22, we are planning not to program the Transportation Trust Fund source T34 (Rail Capital Maintenance).

Capital Program - Preventive Maintenance FY21 FY22 (millions) Program * Program Federal Preventive Maintenance -Bus (T135) 112.69 112.69 Federal Preventive Maintenance -Rail (T39) 249.33 249.33 TTF Rail Capital Maintenance (T34) 98.80 - Total $ 460.82 $ 362.02

* FY21 Program reflects the initial appropriated amount and does not incorporate any allocations thereafter.

E) A breakdown of individual capital program lines and amounts that comprise FY 2021 and FY 2022 capital to operating transfers.

Please see response to question 29d (breakdown of permitted maintenance).

18 Appendix A NJ Transit Corporation System Ridership by Lines FY18-21

Annual Passenger Trips Annual Percent Change in Ridership Revenue Recovery Ratio FY21 FY21 FY21 Mode Service Description FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 Rail Northeast Corridor NY Penn-Trenton/Princeton 31,581,675 32,706,544 23,762,560 5,912,763 (2.5%) 3.6% (27.3%) (75.1%) 83.5% 84.8% 75.0% 36.6% Rail Coast Line NY Penn/Hoboken-Bay Head 14,250,519 14,969,800 11,084,907 3,456,209 (1.5%) 5.0% (26.0%) (68.8%) 52.1% 54.1% 49.6% 24.1% Rail Raritan Valley NY Penn/Hoboken-High Bridge 6,455,306 5,966,932 4,504,163 1,079,650 (1.7%) (7.6%) (24.5%) (76.0%) 50.1% 38.8% 35.7% 17.3% Rail Morris & Essex NY Penn/Hoboken - Dover/Gladstone 16,081,250 17,488,200 12,674,554 3,055,314 (6.1%) 8.7% (27.5%) (75.9%) 53.6% 52.9% 49.7% 19.3% Rail Montclair-Boonton NY Penn/Hoboken-Hackettstown 5,686,760 5,605,514 4,617,536 978,635 6.0% (1.4%) (17.6%) (78.8%) 50.8% 46.5% 49.9% 18.1% Rail Main Line Bergen County Hoboken-Suffern 7,781,521 8,199,420 6,857,758 617,458 (0.5%) 5.4% (16.4%) (91.0%) 53.9% 50.4% 52.6% 13.5% Rail Pascack Valley Hoboken-Montvale 2,913,123 2,545,399 2,325,665 167,241 18.8% (12.6%) (8.6%) (92.8%) 48.2% 47.9% 45.6% 10.8% Rail Atlantic City Atlantic City-Philadelphia 680,022 408,242 417,082 249,266 (8.6%) (40.0%) 2.2% (40.2%) 13.1% 16.3% 12.3% 10.7% Light Rail Hudson Bergen Light Rail North Bergen-Bayonne 15,526,126 15,921,335 11,957,780 6,898,587 0.3% 2.5% (24.9%) (42.3%) 33.5% 33.2% 19.9% 8.2% Light Rail Newark Light Rail Newark-Bloomfield 5,431,405 5,419,437 4,486,029 2,559,132 (1.8%) (0.2%) (17.2%) (43.0%) 34.1% 29.2% 24.1% 12.8% Light Rail River LINE Trenton-Camden 2,735,023 2,744,872 2,172,963 1,424,025 0.8% 0.4% (20.8%) (34.5%) 10.2% 8.9% 9.3% 2.9% Bus 1 Newark - Jersey City 4,247,493 4,283,907 3,601,712 2,599,071 1.0% 0.9% (15.9%) (27.8%) 42.6% 38.7% 30.3% 26.6% Bus ( c ) 2 Journal Square/Secaucus 933,423 925,799 691,877 477,451 5.0% (0.8%) (25.3%) (31.0%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 5 Kinney (Newark - East Orange) 341,946 332,127 272,372 146,110 (3.1%) (2.9%) (18.0%) (46.4%) 20.1% 17.4% 12.9% 9.1% Bus 6 Ocean Ave-Journal Square 415,682 432,565 377,221 228,417 0.7% 4.1% (12.8%) (39.4%) 20.4% 20.0% 12.8% 11.4% Bus ( c ) 10 Bayonne/Jersey City 1,213,480 1,034,727 895,829 833,821 (0.4%) (14.7%) (13.4%) (6.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 11 Newark - Willowbrook 739,849 740,721 567,471 414,344 (7.7%) 0.1% (23.4%) (27.0%) 29.3% 26.2% 17.6% 16.8% Bus 13 Broad Street-Clinton Avenue 3,760,150 3,664,036 2,999,709 1,889,832 (3.0%) (2.6%) (18.1%) (37.0%) 37.7% 34.1% 26.6% 22.2% Bus 21 Main Street 2,733,899 2,689,784 2,336,182 1,622,068 (4.5%) (1.6%) (13.1%) (30.6%) 47.4% 40.6% 31.6% 26.6% Bus ( c ) 22 Hillside 664,021 655,167 490,732 377,303 4.0% (1.3%) (25.1%) (23.1%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 23 Hoboken/North Bergen 48,785 55,483 34,309 11,856 10.2% 13.7% (38.2%) (65.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 25 Springfield Ave 3,682,090 3,629,885 3,157,823 2,213,577 (0.7%) (1.4%) (13.0%) (29.9%) 39.9% 36.4% 28.9% 28.0% Bus 26 Irvington - Elizabeth 313,066 319,457 225,650 159,371 2.7% 2.0% (29.4%) (29.4%) 29.4% 26.4% 18.8% 17.7% Bus 27 Mount Prospect 3,188,288 3,158,315 2,549,591 1,704,294 (1.9%) (0.9%) (19.3%) (33.2%) 33.3% 29.9% 22.6% 21.2% Bus 28 Newark-Montclair St - Willowbrook 688,990 664,809 519,803 311,522 (0.0%) (3.5%) (21.8%) (40.1%) 27.4% 23.7% 17.3% 13.9% Bus 29 Bloomfield Avenue 1,073,160 1,008,847 835,334 613,566 (9.9%) (6.0%) (17.2%) (26.5%) 33.0% 28.0% 20.6% 19.1% Bus 30 North Arlington - KearNY - Newark 640,947 635,105 495,461 320,273 (5.1%) (0.9%) (22.0%) (35.4%) 21.1% 19.4% 14.2% 14.1% Bus 34 (372) Market Street 2,316,224 2,335,204 1,870,814 1,124,772 (3.8%) 0.8% (19.9%) (39.9%) 34.6% 31.7% 23.0% 18.3% Bus 37 Lyons Avenue 622,738 642,875 577,891 338,510 (1.8%) 3.2% (10.1%) (41.4%) 32.2% 29.4% 20.1% 16.5% Bus 39 Irvington-Newark 1,938,793 1,894,700 1,546,057 971,914 (0.3%) (2.3%) (18.4%) (37.1%) 37.8% 34.0% 27.9% 24.5% Bus 40 Kearny-Jersey Gardens 626,041 598,324 495,303 384,577 (2.2%) (4.4%) (17.2%) (22.4%) 22.7% 20.1% 15.1% 16.2% Bus 41 Park Avenue 940,074 878,483 722,755 442,335 (1.6%) (6.6%) (17.7%) (38.8%) 38.9% 33.9% 25.3% 21.9% Bus 48 Elizabeth - Woodbridge - Perth Amboy 735,992 690,054 560,869 401,733 (7.6%) (6.2%) (18.7%) (28.4%) 24.5% 20.9% 14.4% 15.9% Bus 52 Morris Avenue 278,518 270,839 238,299 140,644 (3.7%) (2.8%) (12.0%) (41.0%) 18.0% 17.6% 14.4% 12.3% Bus 56 Elizabeth - Winfield 54,236 53,845 43,310 35,376 (4.6%) (0.7%) (19.6%) (18.3%) 12.0% 10.8% 7.6% 9.0% Bus 57 Tremley 125,962 115,612 105,434 72,529 2.1% (8.2%) (8.8%) (31.2%) 26.3% 22.5% 17.1% 17.2% Bus 58 Elizabeth - Kenilworth 324,538 307,234 241,600 142,381 (8.2%) (5.3%) (21.4%) (41.1%) 28.5% 24.8% 17.4% 14.6% Bus 59 Plainfield-Newark 1,478,886 1,429,084 1,159,970 868,329 (3.4%) (3.4%) (18.8%) (25.1%) 36.3% 32.3% 23.9% 23.1% Bus 62 Newark-Newark Airport-Elizabeth 1,908,196 1,822,581 1,489,904 967,641 (3.4%) (4.5%) (18.3%) (35.1%) 32.9% 29.2% 22.0% 20.1% Bus 63 Lakewood - Jersey City - Weehawken Exp 45,567 45,084 31,036 724 1.2% (1.1%) (31.2%) (97.7%) 72.4% 60.5% 63.0% 2.7% Bus 64 Lakewood - Jersey City - Weehawken 351,095 334,671 226,027 24,132 (1.6%) (4.7%) (32.5%) (89.3%) 57.5% 52.2% 49.0% 4.7% Bus 65 Newark - Somerville 115,356 129,997 104,187 59,192 (1.9%) 12.7% (19.9%) (43.2%) 17.2% 16.8% 12.7% 8.9% Bus 66 Newark-Mountainside-Somerville 529,259 536,962 433,409 251,776 (4.7%) 1.5% (19.3%) (41.9%) 19.5% 17.3% 12.5% 9.6% Bus 67 Toms River-Lakewood - Newark 268,900 264,354 202,865 115,192 (4.3%) (1.7%) (23.3%) (43.2%) 20.8% 20.2% 14.3% 12.6% Bus 68 Old Bridge-East Brunswick - Jersey City - Weehawken 239,554 231,739 155,614 4,500 (2.2%) (3.3%) (32.8%) (97.1%) 74.8% 61.6% 58.5% 2.3% Bus 70 Newark - Livingston M 1,684,805 1,732,502 1,423,453 998,738 (0.7%) 2.8% (17.8%) (29.8%) 30.4% 28.3% 21.0% 21.4% Bus 71 Newark - West Caldwell 672,641 642,695 501,306 335,329 (1.0%) (4.5%) (22.0%) (33.1%) 27.5% 24.1% 17.3% 14.3% Bus 72 Paterson-Bloomfield (Newark - Paterson) 1,040,212 1,009,418 823,121 591,166 (3.2%) (3.0%) (18.5%) (28.2%) 41.7% 36.8% 28.4% 26.0% Bus 73 Newark-Orange-Livingston 927,540 923,194 716,042 486,468 (3.1%) (0.5%) (22.4%) (32.1%) 33.5% 30.1% 21.0% 18.0% Bus 74 Paterson-Nutley-Newark 1,260,587 1,213,779 1,017,630 758,593 (3.3%) (3.7%) (16.2%) (25.5%) 33.7% 30.7% 23.9% 24.3% Bus 76 Newark - Hackensack 1,245,502 1,203,532 910,227 606,596 (2.4%) (3.4%) (24.4%) (33.4%) 31.4% 27.2% 19.5% 17.6% Bus 78 Newark - Secaucus 147,298 160,533 141,736 79,931 2.1% 9.0% (11.7%) (43.6%) 23.4% 22.8% 19.1% 11.9% Bus 79 Newark - ParsippaNY Express 99,964 95,504 71,048 43,826 (10.8%) (4.5%) (25.6%) (38.3%) 25.4% 22.1% 12.0% 9.9% Bus 80 Greenville-JSQ-Exchange Place 1,894,593 1,897,407 1,542,858 982,386 (3.0%) 0.1% (18.7%) (36.3%) 30.1% 26.9% 20.8% 17.5% Bus 81 Bayonne-Jersey City 815,550 839,442 831,292 517,663 (3.3%) 2.9% (1.0%) (37.7%) 29.9% 28.8% 23.0% 18.6% Bus 82 Jersey City Heights - Exchange Place 64,207 52,738 43,918 8,242 (7.0%) (17.9%) (16.7%) (81.2%) 17.0% 12.4% 14.7% 2.8% Bus 83 Hackensack-Jersey City-Journal Square 1,037,950 947,461 749,456 529,679 (5.9%) (8.7%) (20.9%) (29.3%) 28.2% 24.9% 18.7% 19.7% Bus 84 N. Bergen-Jersey Cith-Journal Square 1,211,046 1,120,994 1,066,294 738,455 (10.9%) (7.4%) (4.9%) (30.7%) 21.2% 18.7% 15.6% 18.2% Bus 85 Mill Creek-Harmon Meadow-Hoboken 569,571 552,857 482,104 355,812 (1.9%) (2.9%) (12.8%) (26.2%) 29.3% 25.2% 15.8% 18.2%

Page 1 of 5 Appendix A NJ Transit Corporation System Ridership by Lines FY18-21

Annual Passenger Trips Annual Percent Change in Ridership Revenue Recovery Ratio FY21 FY21 FY21 Mode Service Description FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 Bus 86 Union City-Jersey City-Newport 203,497 203,818 157,280 110,900 (10.3%) 0.2% (22.8%) (29.5%) 15.3% 13.0% 8.6% 9.5% Bus 87 Jersey City-Hoboken 3,003,071 3,068,585 2,603,933 1,583,268 (3.4%) 2.2% (15.1%) (39.2%) 34.3% 30.4% 24.0% 19.0% Bus ( c ) 88 Journal Square/North Boulevard 831,595 787,287 605,075 656,333 (3.4%) (5.3%) (23.1%) 8.5% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 89 North Bergen-Hoboken (Hoboken - North Bergen) 453,815 477,975 359,779 230,626 6.5% 5.3% (24.7%) (35.9%) 26.7% 24.9% 17.5% 16.3% Bus 90 Grove Street Crosstown 704,021 774,430 604,208 409,095 (8.7%) 10.0% (22.0%) (32.3%) 31.3% 29.1% 21.6% 20.4% Bus 92 Orange Crosstown 704,218 691,177 563,465 374,042 (3.9%) (1.9%) (18.5%) (33.6%) 32.2% 29.3% 22.1% 18.9% Bus 94 Stuyvesant Crosstown 3,431,271 3,348,544 2,845,339 2,075,900 (0.1%) (2.4%) (15.0%) (27.0%) 41.8% 36.9% 27.6% 25.4% Bus 95 Wachtung - Newark 42,574 0 0 0 (0.4%) (100.0%) 0% 0% 9.8% ------Bus 96 18Th Street Crosstown 144,493 151,055 112,641 46,715 (4.3%) 4.5% (25.4%) (58.5%) 19.7% 19.1% 12.8% 6.7% Bus 97 East Orange - Montclair 70,216 64,603 49,222 29,121 (1.9%) (8.0%) (23.8%) (40.8%) 11.9% 9.4% 6.3% 5.2% Bus 99 Clifton Avenue Crosstown 1,489,322 1,425,237 1,169,420 620,437 (4.5%) (4.3%) (17.9%) (46.9%) 26.9% 23.5% 19.3% 13.9% Bus 107 South Orange/Irvington-New York 1,135,667 1,201,816 1,077,855 754,237 4.2% 5.8% (10.3%) (30.0%) 53.3% 52.9% 39.7% 39.7% Bus 108 Newark -- NY 430,821 421,315 348,555 223,011 0.1% (2.2%) (17.3%) (36.0%) 43.7% 40.5% 29.5% 27.6% Bus 111 New York-Ikea-Jersey Gardens 825,980 804,755 547,960 131,007 2.4% (2.6%) (31.9%) (76.1%) 114.5% 100.6% 81.7% 24.9% Bus 112 Clark -- NY 673,000 657,666 502,550 326,139 (0.4%) (2.3%) (23.6%) (35.1%) 54.4% 48.7% 36.8% 27.6% Bus 113 Dunellen -- NY 1,143,855 1,136,871 820,200 278,457 (1.1%) (0.6%) (27.9%) (66.1%) 54.6% 47.9% 35.4% 15.3% Bus 114 Bridgewater -- NY 1,678,854 1,687,864 1,279,526 616,683 (1.5%) 0.5% (24.2%) (51.8%) 58.6% 55.3% 41.9% 22.6% Bus 115 Rahway -- NY 348,768 361,393 278,472 136,603 5.0% 3.6% (22.9%) (50.9%) 58.4% 54.9% 42.6% 25.2% Bus 116 Perth Amboy -- NY 756,885 758,684 580,649 345,268 (3.2%) 0.2% (23.5%) (40.5%) 53.9% 47.9% 37.4% 29.0% Bus 117 Somerville -- NY 80,026 80,925 58,461 11,568 (3.8%) 1.1% (27.8%) (80.2%) 53.5% 50.1% 46.0% 11.3% Bus ( c ) 119 Bayonne-Jersey City-Ny 1,298,670 1,541,981 1,433,345 791,922 12.6% 18.7% (7.0%) (44.8%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 120 Bayonne-New York Do (Bayonne - Downtown Manhattan) 74,970 74,991 57,080 15,096 (5.8%) 0.0% (23.9%) (73.6%) 26.4% 24.8% 23.0% 5.2% Bus 121 North Bergen -- NY 37,762 36,500 30,813 21,961 5.2% (3.3%) (15.6%) (28.7%) 17.0% 19.9% 25.9% 22.0% Bus 122 Secaucus -- NY 289,712 283,882 193,469 62,052 2.4% (2.0%) (31.8%) (67.9%) 41.5% 38.4% 31.0% 14.1% Bus 123 Jersey City-Union City -- NY 1,314,665 1,455,824 1,136,656 540,918 5.9% 10.7% (21.9%) (52.4%) 59.2% 54.2% 43.8% 29.3% Bus 124 Secaucus -- NY 102,038 120,685 96,889 69,783 (11.2%) 18.3% (19.7%) (28.0%) 29.8% 31.1% 24.7% 24.2% Bus 125 Jersey City-JSQ-New (Journal Square -- NY) 247,142 264,717 233,529 204,811 (9.9%) 7.1% (11.8%) (12.3%) 32.9% 31.3% 29.0% 36.0% Bus 126 Hoboken -- NY 4,168,517 4,422,233 3,169,429 722,335 1.1% 6.1% (28.3%) (77.2%) 62.6% 57.9% 45.0% 14.0% Bus 127 Ridgefield-Union City-- NY 542,607 562,312 435,689 255,530 2.2% 3.6% (22.5%) (41.4%) 48.0% 44.2% 36.8% 28.5% Bus 128 N. Bergen-Blvd East -- NY 1,743,639 1,899,665 1,481,560 755,985 2.8% 8.9% (22.0%) (49.0%) 71.4% 65.9% 55.6% 30.5% Bus 129 Secaucus-Union City-Ny 681,075 682,706 514,709 265,207 2.0% 0.2% (24.6%) (48.5%) 41.0% 36.5% 27.8% 19.0% Bus 130 Lakewood-Union Hill-New York 194,191 192,818 148,945 56,024 5.0% (0.7%) (22.8%) (62.4%) 80.0% 75.1% 64.8% 29.6% Bus 131 Sayreville -- NY 248,123 241,276 169,582 50,305 4.3% (2.8%) (29.7%) (70.3%) 86.8% 77.7% 73.3% 24.3% Bus 132 Lakewood-Gordons Corner - New York 252,371 259,065 171,258 53,229 0.6% 2.7% (33.9%) (68.9%) 97.9% 92.5% 84.6% 30.6% Bus 133 Old Bridge-Aberdeen-New York 251,306 241,162 165,499 45,793 (2.6%) (4.0%) (31.4%) (72.3%) 76.7% 65.7% 63.6% 17.5% Bus 135 Freehold-Matawan-New York 128,315 129,229 86,640 17,913 (2.3%) 0.7% (33.0%) (79.3%) 84.0% 75.7% 69.4% 16.4% Bus 136 Lakewood-Freehold-New York 104,471 94,830 80,111 22,887 5.9% (9.2%) (15.5%) (71.4%) 75.6% 66.9% 71.9% 27.2% Bus 137 Toms River -- NY 462,445 471,095 350,170 135,719 (0.7%) 1.9% (25.7%) (61.2%) 92.8% 88.6% 66.5% 34.3% Bus 138 Old Bridge-East Brunswick - New York 144,627 135,377 95,656 27,288 0.4% (6.4%) (29.3%) (71.5%) 74.8% 66.1% 63.0% 17.8% Bus 139 Lakewood-Old Bridge-New York 2,992,197 2,953,311 2,217,094 1,087,496 (3.1%) (1.3%) (24.9%) (50.9%) 97.9% 89.6% 63.4% 44.2% Bus 144 Elmwood Park-Hackensack-New York 264,337 261,834 189,926 99,648 9.1% (0.9%) (27.5%) (47.5%) 52.0% 46.9% 35.1% 20.0% Bus 145 Fair Lawn -- NY 177,044 159,631 115,613 25,281 (3.5%) (9.8%) (27.6%) (78.1%) 57.3% 47.2% 35.6% 12.7% Bus 148 Midland Park -- NY 69,370 68,619 48,316 6,971 (4.7%) (1.1%) (29.6%) (85.6%) 60.5% 54.8% 37.8% 7.3% Bus 151 Paterson -- NY Express 132,857 178,278 148,413 77,283 15.0% 34.2% (16.8%) (47.9%) 64.7% 72.5% 59.7% 35.2% Bus 153 Fairview-Fort Lee-New York 54,064 42,497 19,533 904 12.3% (21.4%) (54.0%) (95.4%) 63.8% 49.9% 35.0% 6.0% Bus 154 Fort Lee-Palisades Park-New York 660,487 687,482 529,786 280,979 7.3% 4.1% (22.9%) (47.0%) 56.1% 49.3% 38.0% 25.1% Bus 155 Bogota-Ridgefield Park-New York 151,529 141,888 104,021 33,581 13.0% (6.4%) (26.7%) (67.7%) 58.6% 48.7% 39.6% 16.2% Bus 156 Englewood Cliffs-Fort Lee-New York 1,779,545 1,821,328 1,419,056 763,123 1.8% 2.3% (22.1%) (46.2%) 52.3% 48.5% 38.2% 25.7% Bus 157 Teaneck-Ridgefiend Park - New York 84,131 77,907 56,452 16,110 4.0% (7.4%) (27.5%) (71.5%) 49.3% 41.3% 30.9% 14.6% Bus 158 Fort Lee-Edgewater-New York 2,143,229 2,215,716 1,610,643 547,974 1.0% 3.4% (27.3%) (66.0%) 69.3% 62.5% 43.5% 18.9% Bus 159 Fort Lee -- NY 2,992,896 3,097,006 2,478,113 1,448,937 (2.1%) 3.5% (20.0%) (41.5%) 55.2% 51.5% 40.1% 29.6% Bus 160 Elmwood Park-Wallin (Elmwood Park -- NY) 682,175 697,704 546,982 292,226 3.5% 2.3% (21.6%) (46.6%) 51.1% 47.5% 34.7% 26.3% Bus 161 Paterson-Passaic-Ne (Paterson -- NY) 1,965,434 1,917,914 1,571,337 1,061,308 (0.2%) (2.4%) (18.1%) (32.5%) 60.7% 54.2% 43.2% 39.1% Bus 162 Maywood -- NY 323,131 310,455 220,564 68,288 4.9% (3.9%) (29.0%) (69.0%) 51.5% 42.7% 32.5% 13.4% Bus 163 Ridgewood -- NY 2,438,923 2,420,327 1,791,157 784,584 (0.5%) (0.8%) (26.0%) (56.2%) 54.0% 48.3% 34.2% 17.9% Bus 164 Midland Park-Fair Lawn (Midland Park -- NY) 856,678 834,968 617,879 218,188 (5.4%) (2.5%) (26.0%) (64.7%) 48.7% 43.3% 31.8% 15.6% Bus 165 Westwood -- NY 3,616,606 3,539,659 2,742,192 1,608,914 (0.7%) (2.1%) (22.5%) (41.3%) 56.2% 50.0% 37.3% 24.5% Bus 166 Cresskill-Bergenfield-New York 4,725,649 4,780,520 3,689,966 2,088,332 1.8% 1.2% (22.8%) (43.4%) 60.2% 55.7% 39.1% 25.7% Bus 167 Harrington Park-Teaneck-New York 2,068,157 2,028,628 1,474,615 552,556 1.0% (1.9%) (27.3%) (62.5%) 65.6% 57.7% 39.9% 21.5%

Page 2 of 5 Appendix A NJ Transit Corporation System Ridership by Lines FY18-21

Annual Passenger Trips Annual Percent Change in Ridership Revenue Recovery Ratio FY21 FY21 FY21 Mode Service Description FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 Bus 168 Paramus -- NY 918,465 910,522 695,169 354,500 (3.2%) (0.9%) (23.7%) (49.0%) 40.3% 36.5% 28.1% 18.4% Bus 171 Paterson-New York (GWB) 420,413 455,300 433,240 328,584 7.4% 8.3% (4.8%) (24.2%) 35.3% 36.9% 34.0% 35.6% Bus 175 Ridgewood-New York (GWB) 506,311 531,702 413,458 257,087 7.2% 5.0% (22.2%) (37.8%) 28.0% 28.0% 22.1% 21.3% Bus 177 Harrington Park -- NY 766,697 853,801 623,030 215,780 1.6% 11.4% (27.0%) (65.4%) 69.0% 63.0% 49.3% 23.1% Bus 178 Hackensack-Englewood-New York (GWB) 499,906 544,107 428,901 283,171 1.4% 8.8% (21.2%) (34.0%) 34.9% 34.9% 27.3% 26.6% Bus 181 Union City-New York (GWB) 161,895 189,239 166,914 140,989 14.1% 16.9% (11.8%) (15.5%) 32.4% 36.9% 30.8% 44.2% Bus 182 Hackensack-New York (GWB) 364,409 423,399 317,945 213,052 15.7% 16.2% (24.9%) (33.0%) 40.9% 43.3% 32.5% 30.6% Bus 186 Dumont-New York (GWB) 699,745 781,106 652,790 432,733 4.9% 11.6% (16.4%) (33.7%) 44.6% 42.9% 35.3% 32.5% Bus 188 West New York-New York (GWB) 205,723 214,698 188,109 156,483 10.6% 4.4% (12.4%) (16.8%) 33.6% 32.8% 29.7% 39.7% Bus 190 Paterson-Secaucus-New York 2,893,510 2,948,488 2,430,824 1,400,558 (1.8%) 1.9% (17.6%) (42.4%) 53.3% 49.4% 38.9% 30.5% Bus 191 Willowbrook-Montclair-New York 403,634 394,864 303,840 112,089 0.2% (2.2%) (23.1%) (63.1%) 62.0% 57.4% 46.1% 23.4% Bus 192 Clifton -- NY 1,001,147 1,011,962 776,263 309,378 (1.5%) 1.1% (23.3%) (60.1%) 68.4% 63.6% 47.9% 25.3% Bus 193 Willowbrook-New York 478,919 474,519 349,052 75,236 2.8% (0.9%) (26.4%) (78.4%) 129.6% 104.4% 91.9% 25.9% Bus 194 Stockholm-West Milford-New York 568,082 556,331 395,556 125,442 0.8% (2.1%) (28.9%) (68.3%) 69.3% 64.0% 49.1% 20.2% Bus 195 Willowbrook-New York 305,039 293,156 204,617 69,182 0.2% (3.9%) (30.2%) (66.2%) 54.5% 48.4% 35.6% 15.6% Bus 196 Warwick-Ringwood-New York 200,515 195,054 138,527 46,676 (1.7%) (2.7%) (29.0%) (66.3%) 79.1% 78.8% 74.3% 22.8% Bus 197 Warwick-Wayne-New York 740,851 728,019 543,365 203,940 0.8% (1.7%) (25.4%) (62.5%) 60.8% 56.5% 42.8% 21.7% Bus 198 Wayne-William Paterson Univ-New York 194,858 200,113 149,758 56,149 3.3% 2.7% (25.2%) (62.5%) 73.1% 71.1% 52.2% 21.1% Bus 199 Clifton-Lyndhurst-New York 534,692 519,110 362,366 153,632 2.1% (2.9%) (30.2%) (57.6%) 64.9% 56.7% 46.3% 22.5% Bus 250 GO25 Irvington-Springfield Ave 182,646 177,785 122,239 36,838 3.1% (2.7%) (31.2%) (69.9%) 23.6% 21.4% 21.1% 7.1% Bus 258 GO28 (Newark Airport - Newark - Bloomfield 790,885 807,615 671,307 360,182 (1.3%) 2.1% (16.9%) (46.3%) 26.3% 24.7% 17.3% 13.0% Bus 307 Freehold - Great Adventure 0 0 0 0 ------0% 0% ------Bus 308 Seasonal Great Adventure-New York 70,401 72,764 54,153 0 (19.5%) 3.4% (25.6%) (100.0%) 97.9% 91.1% 119.4% - - - Bus 313 Cape May Via Millville-Wildwood-Philadelphia 69,489 70,432 56,690 39,855 (3.2%) 1.4% (19.5%) (29.7%) 15.0% 15.0% 10.4% 12.3% Bus 315 Cape May Via Tuckahoe-Wildwood-Philadelphia 37,534 39,753 31,807 24,549 (7.2%) 5.9% (20.0%) (22.8%) 24.7% 24.9% 18.6% 20.5% Bus 316 Seasonal-Philadelphia-Cape May Express 21,911 20,985 17,991 18,299 (14.9%) (4.2%) (14.3%) 1.7% 43.9% 43.4% 44.0% 40.6% Bus 317 Asbury Park-Fort Dix-Philadelphia 226,552 225,504 177,803 114,760 (1.7%) (0.5%) (21.2%) (35.5%) 19.1% 18.4% 13.7% 14.7% Bus 318 Seasonal-Great Adventure-Philadelphia 0 0 0 0 ------0% 0% ------Bus 319 Seasonal-New York-Atlantic City-Cape May 328,677 364,818 285,100 250,618 (0.8%) 11.0% (21.9%) (12.1%) 93.3% 113.6% 85.0% 148.9% Bus 320 Mill Creek-N. Bergen Park-Ride-New York 1,712,683 1,711,762 1,221,625 407,839 (0.7%) (0.1%) (28.6%) (66.6%) 84.5% 86.4% 67.9% 31.5% Bus 321 Vince Lombardi Park-Ride-New York 298,981 285,872 195,776 38,149 5.8% (4.4%) (31.5%) (80.5%) 58.5% 59.1% 58.6% 12.7% Bus 324 Wayne Rt.23 Park-Ride-New York 412,940 394,554 280,834 57,656 (2.7%) (4.5%) (28.8%) (79.5%) 87.3% 74.2% 61.6% 14.3% Bus 329 Harmon Cove - Secaucus 41,399 59,859 39,020 6,779 (29.1%) 44.6% (34.8%) (82.6%) 7.4% 10.1% 8.0% 1.7% Bus 346 Princeton Dinky 0 144,608 3,266 2,203 ------(97.7%) (32.6%) 0.2% 3.3% 11.1% 7.3% Bus 353 Special Events-Meadowlands-Secaucus Jct 402 5,558 3,231 0 (78.4%) 1282.6% (41.9%) (100.0%) 19.5% 18.6% 17.2% - - - Bus 355 American Dream New 0 0 27,047 843 ------0% (96.9%) ------15.4% 0.6% Bus 356 American Dream Seca 0 0 4,595 18 ------0% (99.6%) ------0.9% - - - Bus 361 Newark Express 108,217 106,508 77,207 23,340 3.3% (1.6%) (27.5%) (69.8%) 30.1% 26.7% 18.7% 6.7% Bus 375 Springfield Ave Express 57,397 55,065 41,911 12,156 22.0% (4.1%) (23.9%) (71.0%) 24.4% 23.3% 17.2% 6.1% Bus 378 Newark - Secaucus Express 13,340 11,882 7,397 10,266 2.9% (10.9%) (37.7%) 38.8% 33.3% 29.4% 12.6% 27.2% Bus 400 Sicklerville - Phila 1,273,599 1,185,168 1,023,610 700,391 (5.2%) (6.9%) (13.6%) (31.6%) 22.2% 18.3% 15.4% 16.0% Bus 401 Salem - Phila 188,920 195,639 173,309 123,011 1.3% 3.6% (11.4%) (29.0%) 17.8% 17.3% 13.8% 15.1% Bus 402 Pennsville - Phila 163,444 164,815 145,817 99,695 (3.3%) 0.8% (11.5%) (31.6%) 22.2% 20.9% 17.2% 15.6% Bus 403 Camden-Lindenwold-Turnersville 733,141 685,356 529,493 335,491 (4.9%) (6.5%) (22.7%) (36.6%) 21.8% 19.0% 14.5% 14.1% Bus 404 Cherry Hill Mall-Pennsauken-Philadelphia 405,288 383,940 314,215 172,330 (9.4%) (5.3%) (18.2%) (45.2%) 20.2% 18.6% 16.4% 14.1% Bus 405 Camden-Merchantville-Cherry Hill Mall 198,012 187,955 146,529 81,239 (7.6%) (5.1%) (22.0%) (44.6%) 21.1% 18.3% 15.1% 12.4% Bus 406 Berlin-Marlton-Philadelphia 468,494 438,185 345,332 217,431 (9.1%) (6.5%) (21.2%) (37.0%) 20.5% 17.9% 13.2% 11.6% Bus 407 Camden-Merchantville-Moorestown Mall 290,594 272,374 218,884 128,679 (5.4%) (6.3%) (19.6%) (41.2%) 16.7% 14.7% 11.6% 11.1% Bus 408 Millville - Phila 339,360 329,822 263,221 172,113 (3.1%) (2.8%) (20.2%) (34.6%) 20.4% 19.0% 14.7% 12.8% Bus 409 Trenton-Willingboro (Trenton - Phila) 610,716 554,057 452,665 295,083 (6.3%) (9.3%) (18.3%) (34.8%) 15.9% 13.6% 10.2% 10.5% Bus 410 Bridgeton - Phila 278,686 265,098 239,059 160,871 (5.7%) (4.9%) (9.8%) (32.7%) 20.8% 18.2% 14.7% 13.7% Bus 412 Sewell-Glassboro-Philadelphia 254,350 244,995 206,956 142,902 (4.6%) (3.7%) (15.5%) (31.0%) 18.3% 16.5% 12.2% 12.0% Bus 413 Camden-Mount Holly-Burlington 438,703 434,329 355,280 219,904 0.3% (1.0%) (18.2%) (38.1%) 22.3% 21.1% 15.4% 14.9% Bus 414 Philadelphia - Moorestown 17,038 18,278 13,502 2,511 0.9% 7.3% (26.1%) (81.4%) 12.0% 11.1% 10.5% 2.1% Bus 417 Mt. Holly-Willingboro-Philadelphia 19,687 23,152 13,696 2,201 (12.8%) 17.6% (40.8%) (83.9%) 10.0% 9.7% 7.8% 1.0% Bus 418 Trenton-Willingboro-Philadelphia 4,906 5,992 4,558 472 (22.6%) 22.1% (23.9%) (89.7%) 8.1% 8.8% 12.1% 1.0% Bus 419 Camden-Pennsauken-Riverside 123,946 111,158 95,914 57,702 (6.0%) (10.3%) (13.7%) (39.8%) 8.8% 7.4% 5.5% 5.8% Bus 450 Cherry Hill Mall - Camden 298,613 289,138 229,708 141,636 (8.2%) (3.2%) (20.6%) (38.3%) 16.2% 15.2% 12.1% 12.5% Bus 451 Camden-Voorhees Tow (Lindenwold PATCO - Camden) 52,946 49,364 37,763 21,087 5.4% (6.8%) (23.5%) (44.2%) 8.4% 7.1% 5.1% 5.2%

Page 3 of 5 Appendix A NJ Transit Corporation System Ridership by Lines FY18-21

Annual Passenger Trips Annual Percent Change in Ridership Revenue Recovery Ratio FY21 FY21 FY21 Mode Service Description FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 Bus 452 Pennsauken - Camden 359,220 336,732 276,015 129,897 (7.2%) (6.3%) (18.0%) (52.9%) 13.3% 12.0% 10.0% 8.1% Bus 453 Ferry Avenue Patco-Camden 79,111 76,128 56,835 21,945 (18.9%) (3.8%) (25.3%) (61.4%) 11.6% 10.7% 11.4% 5.9% Bus 455 Cherry Hill Mall-Woodbury-Paulsboro 189,413 184,052 149,183 98,637 (9.7%) (2.8%) (18.9%) (33.9%) 11.6% 10.3% 7.3% 8.2% Bus 457 Moorestown Mall-Camden 164,995 161,545 132,438 74,435 (8.6%) (2.1%) (18.0%) (43.8%) 11.2% 10.5% 8.8% 8.0% Bus 459 Voorhees Town Center-Avandale Park-Ride 193,201 178,443 133,440 73,095 (10.2%) (7.6%) (25.2%) (45.2%) 12.2% 11.1% 8.6% 6.7% Bus 460 Camden Seasonal 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) - - - 0% 0% ------Bus 463 Woodbury - Avandale Park-Ride 47,805 48,433 38,522 17,456 (9.9%) 1.3% (20.5%) (54.7%) 8.2% 8.0% 5.6% 3.8% Bus ( c ) 468 Penns Grove-Woodstown 97,283 93,923 70,503 48,172 (4.1%) (3.5%) (24.9%) (31.7%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 501 Atlantic City - Brigantine 241,926 240,880 186,003 127,133 (5.3%) (0.4%) (22.8%) (31.6%) 12.8% 11.7% 9.7% 11.2% Bus 502 Atlantic City-Hamilton Mall- Ac Community College 717,618 673,953 545,524 387,251 2.6% (6.1%) (19.1%) (29.0%) 31.3% 26.9% 22.0% 23.5% Bus 504 Bungalow Park-Chelsea Heights-Ventnor Plaza 163,524 159,952 138,908 83,843 0.3% (2.2%) (13.2%) (39.6%) 10.3% 9.7% 9.4% 8.3% Bus 505 Atlantic City-Margate-Longport 1,183,108 1,192,976 1,023,907 706,190 (2.5%) 0.8% (14.2%) (31.0%) 16.8% 15.5% 13.3% 14.8% Bus 507 Atlantic City - Ocean City 607,080 628,538 525,185 386,213 (4.2%) 3.5% (16.4%) (26.5%) 31.4% 29.1% 22.1% 26.2% Bus 508 Atlantic City-Stockton Univ-Hamilton Mall 521,107 522,898 423,445 280,600 (0.6%) 0.3% (19.0%) (33.7%) 28.3% 25.0% 18.7% 19.9% Bus 509 Atlantic City - Somers Point 358,853 343,195 281,092 199,147 (3.7%) (4.4%) (18.1%) (29.2%) 33.5% 27.8% 21.2% 25.2% Bus 510 Cape May - Wildwood Shuttle 8,543 5,945 5,342 0 34.8% (30.4%) (10.1%) (100.0%) 44.6% 31.4% 38.0% - - - Bus 551 Philadelphia-Atlantic City 495,281 564,155 424,350 341,552 (3.4%) 13.9% (24.8%) (19.5%) 42.0% 51.7% 36.4% 53.1% Bus 552 Atlantic City - Cape May 584,243 577,811 466,870 340,948 (0.4%) (1.1%) (19.2%) (27.0%) 18.9% 17.9% 13.6% 16.8% Bus 553 Atlantic City - Upper Deerfield 893,918 883,555 730,157 473,558 (3.0%) (1.2%) (17.4%) (35.1%) 27.0% 23.9% 17.9% 18.9% Bus 554 Lindenwold-Patco-Atlantic City 644,317 707,410 513,346 376,643 (2.1%) 9.8% (27.4%) (26.6%) 26.0% 28.3% 16.8% 21.3% Bus 555 Avandale-Phila 30Th Street 27,362 32,298 19,646 3,508 105.7% 18.0% (39.2%) (82.1%) 31.4% 35.9% 32.7% 8.3% Bus 559 Atlantic City - Lakewood 661,456 659,249 547,553 412,089 (5.0%) (0.3%) (16.9%) (24.7%) 25.4% 24.2% 17.7% 21.8% Bus 600 Trenton-Plainsboro 219,714 199,895 146,501 66,632 (3.2%) (9.0%) (26.7%) (54.5%) 14.6% 12.6% 9.1% 5.9% Bus 601 College Of Nj-Trenton-Hamilton 368,990 326,295 275,683 165,015 (7.3%) (11.6%) (15.5%) (40.1%) 22.1% 17.8% 12.6% 10.9% Bus 603 Mercer Mall-Hamilton 273,549 250,149 199,346 125,970 (4.1%) (8.6%) (20.3%) (36.8%) 23.8% 22.2% 18.5% 12.8% Bus 605 Montgomery - Princeton - Quaker Bridge Mall 118,893 116,097 82,429 48,964 (10.0%) (2.4%) (29.0%) (40.6%) 12.1% 10.8% 7.9% 5.3% Bus 606 Princeton-Mercerville - Hamilton Marketplace 600,127 562,614 492,916 308,815 (4.8%) (6.3%) (12.4%) (37.3%) 24.7% 21.0% 16.2% 11.7% Bus 607 Ewing-Trenton-Independence Plaza 202,308 193,459 154,309 86,385 (7.8%) (4.4%) (20.2%) (44.0%) 15.1% 14.8% 10.8% 8.3% Bus 608 Hamilton-West Trenton 460,056 439,846 332,275 185,572 (6.1%) (4.4%) (24.5%) (44.2%) 23.8% 21.8% 18.1% 12.2% Bus 609 Ewing-Quaker Bridge Mall 577,932 531,618 429,114 258,975 (3.5%) (8.0%) (19.3%) (39.6%) 23.6% 20.9% 17.0% 13.6% Bus 610 Trenton Seasonal 2,896 2,440 2,282 132 (30.9%) (15.7%) (6.5%) (94.2%) 16.3% 12.4% 14.7% 1.2% Bus 611 Trenton-River View Plaza 23,965 23,512 16,460 156 (2.6%) (1.9%) (30.0%) (99.1%) 82.8% 86.4% 75.7% 0.1% Bus 612 Lawrence-W. Windsor -Princeton Jct Shuttle 16,073 15,019 9,465 1,239 (11.9%) (6.6%) (37.0%) (86.9%) 4.6% 5.3% 5.4% 0.5% Bus 613 Mercer Mall-Yardvil (Mercer Mall - Trenton - Hamilton) 413,854 399,523 329,008 224,563 (3.9%) (3.5%) (17.6%) (31.7%) 26.0% 23.3% 21.0% 14.7% Bus 619 Ewing-Mercer County College 188,990 162,842 136,476 75,071 (11.0%) (13.8%) (16.2%) (45.0%) 19.6% 16.4% 19.5% 8.6% Bus 624 Pennington-East Trenton 106,328 105,494 75,739 36,721 1.4% (0.8%) (28.2%) (51.5%) 14.2% 13.4% 10.2% 5.8% Bus 655 Princeton - Plainsboro 0 0 0 0 ------0% 0% ------Bus ( c ) 702 Paterson/Elmwood Park 128,692 133,632 88,875 62,084 (3.5%) 3.8% (33.5%) (30.1%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 703 Haledon-Paterson-East Rutherford 1,088,800 1,078,736 920,607 716,121 (3.5%) (0.9%) (14.7%) (22.2%) 29.5% 26.7% 18.0% 18.7% Bus 704 Pateron-Willowbrook Mall 651,548 626,198 471,140 306,892 (2.8%) (3.9%) (24.8%) (34.9%) 35.4% 31.1% 23.6% 19.8% Bus ( c ) 705 Passaic/Willowbrook Mall 104,995 147,102 97,582 58,606 (34.7%) 40.1% (33.7%) (39.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 707 Paterson-Saddle Brook 113,655 139,200 87,024 81,256 (21.0%) 22.5% (37.5%) (6.6%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 709 Bloomfield/Paramus 330,313 367,990 298,829 260,887 (11.0%) 11.4% (18.8%) (12.7%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 712 (366) Hackensack - Willowbrook 1,226,835 1,175,397 944,042 623,671 0.0% (4.2%) (19.7%) (33.9%) 40.8% 34.9% 26.0% - - - Bus ( c ) 722 Paterson/Paramus Park 12,569 14,759 7,800 6,159 (26.2%) 17.4% (47.2%) (21.0%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 744 Paterson/Greystone Park 309,538 369,074 242,347 195,107 (19.0%) 19.2% (34.3%) (19.5%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 746 Pompton Lakes/Ridgewood 146,687 136,134 89,386 79,293 (11.5%) (7.2%) (34.3%) (11.3%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 748 Paterson/Willowbrook Mall 118,212 128,492 84,349 61,481 (18.1%) 8.7% (34.4%) (27.1%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 751 Paramus/Fairview/Edgewater 93,817 30,842 67,321 44,890 (25.9%) (67.1%) 118.3% (33.3%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 752 Oakland/Hackensack 59,210 44,721 40,596 39,671 (19.4%) (24.5%) (9.2%) (2.3%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 753 New Milford/Paramus 34,905 20,075 33,212 25,584 (37.0%) (42.5%) 65.4% (23.0%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 755 Paramus/Fort Lee/Edgewater 48,325 28,686 36,904 30,317 (23.5%) (40.6%) 28.6% (17.8%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 756 Fort Lee/Paramus 128,392 94,404 104,992 77,430 (29.9%) (26.5%) 11.2% (26.3%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 758 Passaic/Paramus Park 128,162 145,531 109,718 97,012 (21.0%) 13.6% (24.6%) (11.6%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 762 Hackensack/Paramus 34,807 18,851 24,500 14,348 (19.3%) (45.8%) 30.0% (41.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 770 Paterson - Hackensack 346,814 301,388 267,465 205,148 (5.3%) (13.1%) (11.3%) (23.3%) 24.0% 24.3% 18.3% - - - Bus ( c ) 772 New Milford/Secaucus 59,005 52,189 64,384 70,539 (11.1%) (11.6%) 23.4% 9.6% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 780 Englewood/Passaic 247,146 179,106 222,095 200,097 (19.3%) (27.5%) 24.0% (9.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 801 Metropark Loop 45,897 41,640 28,265 5,618 (8.3%) (9.3%) (32.1%) (80.1%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted)

Page 4 of 5 Appendix A NJ Transit Corporation System Ridership by Lines FY18-21

Annual Passenger Trips Annual Percent Change in Ridership Revenue Recovery Ratio FY21 FY21 FY21 Mode Service Description FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 FY18 FY19 FY20 Projection 1 Bus ( c ) 802 Metropark Loop 90,863 90,741 58,412 5,422 (6.9%) (0.1%) (35.6%) (90.7%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 803 Metropark Loop 124,914 101,477 59,257 6,601 (3.4%) (18.8%) (41.6%) (88.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 804 Metropark Loop 63,638 59,794 43,041 5,681 (6.9%) (6.0%) (28.0%) (86.8%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 805 Metropark Loop 74,110 75,535 53,160 5,633 (9.0%) 1.9% (29.6%) (89.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 810 New Brunswick/Woodbridge Ct 193,263 192,025 135,869 105,134 (3.1%) (0.6%) (29.2%) (22.6%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 811 New Brunswick/South River 73,719 71,742 48,106 30,343 (6.6%) (2.7%) (32.9%) (36.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 813 Perth Amboy/Middlesex College 211,483 194,673 138,852 71,464 (12.3%) (7.9%) (28.7%) (48.5%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 814 North Brunswick/Middlesex College 242,663 224,507 190,121 91,641 (6.5%) (7.5%) (15.3%) (51.8%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 815 Woodbridge Center/New Brunswick 298,814 283,253 192,500 149,910 (9.1%) (5.2%) (32.0%) (22.1%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 817 Perth Amboy/Middletown 97,519 97,474 70,636 54,234 8.2% (0.0%) (27.5%) (23.2%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 818 New Brunswick/Old Bridge 103,635 97,834 71,882 44,245 (3.9%) (5.6%) (26.5%) (38.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 819 Piscataway/Middlesex Mall 129,588 119,797 76,340 50,615 (13.0%) (7.6%) (36.3%) (33.7%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 822 North Plainfield/Plainfield 18,118 20,136 16,501 7,090 21.0% 11.1% (18.1%) (57.0%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 830 Asbury Park/Point Pleasant Beach 93,445 95,486 73,905 49,783 (8.9%) 2.2% (22.6%) (32.6%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 831 Red Bank/Long Branch 126,057 124,174 91,219 65,443 (4.4%) (1.5%) (26.5%) (28.3%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 832 Red Bank /Asbury Park 229,142 204,032 154,887 82,948 (1.6%) (11.0%) (24.1%) (46.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 833 Red Bank /Freehold Raceway Mall 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 834 Red Bank /Highlands 87,257 86,426 67,883 49,141 (2.5%) (1.0%) (21.5%) (27.6%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 835 Red Bank /Sea Bright 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 836 Asbury Park /Centra State 149,429 129,711 101,267 71,396 (3.2%) (13.2%) (21.9%) (29.5%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 837 Long Branch To Seaview Square Mall 116,799 115,077 93,984 61,681 (5.6%) (1.5%) (18.3%) (34.4%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 838 Freehold/Red Bank/Sea Bright 77,907 73,414 54,277 28,844 24.0% (5.8%) (26.1%) (46.9%) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 871 Morristown - Boonton - Willowbrook 40,146 34,839 29,456 20,530 (5.3%) (13.2%) (15.5%) (30.3%) 10.5% 7.5% 6.9% 7.3% Bus 872 Morristown-Rt.10-Parsippany 12,962 11,050 9,868 4,614 (14.7%) (14.8%) (10.7%) (53.2%) 8.5% 5.7% 5.6% 3.9% Bus 873 Greystone - Morristown - Livinston 50,637 47,747 37,941 26,875 9.2% (5.7%) (20.5%) (29.2%) 9.0% 7.2% 6.2% 6.3% Bus 874 Morristown - Willowbrook 34,465 32,266 28,652 20,689 5.1% (6.4%) (11.2%) (27.8%) 13.6% 10.7% 9.8% 10.1% Bus 875 Rockaway-Dover-Roxbury 33,099 29,023 22,095 9,954 (10.4%) (12.3%) (23.9%) (54.9%) 11.0% 8.3% 6.7% 4.8% Bus ( c ) 878 Convent Station 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 879 Liberty State Park 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus 880 Morris - Dover - Rockaway Mall 127,259 132,363 119,452 80,727 2.5% 4.0% (9.8%) (32.4%) 19.1% 16.2% 16.0% 15.4% Bus ( c ) 890 South Main 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 891 Heckman 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) Bus ( c ) 986 Summit/Murray Hill/Plainfield 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) 0.0% 0% 0% (contracted) (contracted) (contracted) (contracted)

System 260,567,430 262,869,393 205,088,676 97,880,280 (1.6%) 0.9% (22.0%) (52.3%) 43.4% 42.2% 31.1% 10.0%

1 FY21 Projection: Based on Feb YTD Actuals for Bus and Lt Rail, Oct YTD Actuals for Rail

Page 5 of 5