DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment MARINE ENERGY WALES MARINE ENERGY TEST AREA (META) Environmental Impact Assessment Habitat Regulations Assessment: Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment EOR0730 Marine Energy Test Area Rev: 03 December 05 2019 rpsgroup.com Document Status Version Date Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date Rev00 10/05/2019 AP RDS 15/05/19 Rev01 23/05/2019 AP RDS 23/05/19 Rev02 03/06/19 AP RDS RDS 04/06/19 Rev03 05/06/19 AP RDS RDS 05/06/19 Rev 04 4/12/19 JK JH JH 4/12/19 Approval for issue Jessica Hooper 2019-12-05 • This report was prepared by RPS Energy Ltd. (‘RPS’) within the terms of its engagement and in direct response to a scope of services. This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and must not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing the report, RPS may have relied upon information provided to it at the time by other parties. RPS accepts no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of information provided by those parties at the time of preparing the report. The report does not take into account any changes in information that may have occurred since the publication of the report. If the information relied upon is subsequently determined to be false, inaccurate or incomplete then it is possible that the observations and conclusions expressed in the report may have changed. RPS does not warrant the contents of this report and shall not assume any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report howsoever. No part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS. All enquiries should be directed to RPS. Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS Energy Ltd. Marine Energy Wales EOR0730 | Marine Energy Test Area | Rev: 03 | December 05 2019 rpsgroup.com Page i Table of Contents 4.5 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project in-combination with other plans or projects ............................................................................................................................ 50 5. ASSESSMENT OF ADVERSE EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY: ANNEX II SPECIES – DIADROMOUS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 FISH ................................................................................................................................ 58 1.1 Overview and purpose of this report ................................................................................... 1 5.2 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................... 58 1.2 META project overview ...................................................................................................... 2 5.3 Baseline information ......................................................................................................... 58 1.2.2 Warrior Way (site 6) .............................................................................................. 2 5.3.2 Pembrokeshire Marine SAC ................................................................................. 58 1.2.3 Dale Roads (site 7) ............................................................................................... 2 5.3.3 Cleddau Rivers SAC ............................................................................................ 59 1.2.4 East Pickard Bay (site 8) ....................................................................................... 2 5.4 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project alone ............................... 59 1.3 The Habitat Regulations ..................................................................................................... 7 5.4.1 Potential impacts – installation/decommissioning ................................................. 59 1.3.1 Legislative context ................................................................................................ 7 5.4.2 Potential impacts – operation and maintenance ................................................... 66 1.3.2 The process.......................................................................................................... 7 5.5 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project in-combination with other plans or 1.3.3 The Appropriate Assessment ................................................................................ 8 projects ............................................................................................................................ 73 2. SUMMARY OF THE SCREENING EXERCISE FOR THE META PROJECT ...................... 10 6. ASSESSMENT OF ADVERSE EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY: ANNEX II SPECIES – MARINE 2.2 Sites considered during HRA screening ............................................................................ 10 MAMMALS ...................................................................................................................... 80 2.2.1 Sites designated for Annex I habitats (subtidal and coastal) ................................. 10 6.2 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................... 80 2.2.2 Sites designated for Annex II diadromous migratory fish ...................................... 10 6.3 Baseline information ......................................................................................................... 81 2.2.3 Sites designated for Annex II marine mammals ................................................... 11 6.3.2 Harbour porpoise ................................................................................................ 81 2.2.4 Sites designated for marine ornithological features .............................................. 12 6.3.3 Grey seal ............................................................................................................ 82 2.2.5 Sites designated for Annex II otters ..................................................................... 12 6.4 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project alone ............................... 84 2.2.6 Sites designated for Annex II onshore/coastal ornithological features ................... 12 6.4.1 Potential impacts – installation/decommissioning ................................................. 84 2.3 META project design envelope changes since HRA Screening .......................................... 13 6.4.2 Potential impacts – operation and maintenance ................................................... 91 2.3.2 Benthic ecology .................................................................................................. 13 6.5 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project in-combination with other plans or 2.3.3 Otter ................................................................................................................... 13 projects .......................................................................................................................... 107 2.3.4 Marine ornithology .............................................................................................. 13 7. ASSESSMENT OF ADVERSE EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY: ANNEX II SPECIES – OTTERS117 2.3.5 Onshore/coastal ornithological features ............................................................... 14 7.2 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................. 117 2.4 Consultation .................................................................................................................... 14 7.3 Baseline information ....................................................................................................... 117 2.4.2 Benthic ecology .................................................................................................. 18 7.4 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project alone ............................. 119 2.4.3 Diadromous fish .................................................................................................. 18 7.4.1 Potential impacts – installation/decommissioning ............................................... 119 2.4.4 Marine mammals ................................................................................................ 18 7.4.2 Potential impacts – operation and maintenance ................................................. 120 2.4.5 Marine ornithology .............................................................................................. 19 7.5 Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity – the META project In-combination with other plans or 2.5 Likely significant effects ................................................................................................... 19 projects .......................................................................................................................... 126 3. INFORMATION TO INFORM THE APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT .................................. 28 8. ASSESSMENT OF ADVERSE EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY: ANNEX II SPECIES – MARINE 3.2 Maximum and most likely design scenarios....................................................................... 28 ORNITHOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 130 3.3 Project designed-in mitigation..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEMBROKESHIRE © Lonelyplanetpublications Biggest Megalithicmonumentinwales
    © Lonely Planet Publications 162 lonelyplanet.com PEMBROKESHIRE COAST NATIONAL PARK •• Information 163 porpoises and whales are frequently spotted PEMBROKESHIRE COAST in coastal waters. Pembrokeshire The park is also a focus for activities, from NATIONAL PARK hiking and bird-watching to high-adrenaline sports such as surfing, coasteering, sea kayak- The Pembrokeshire Coast National Park (Parc ing and rock climbing. Cenedlaethol Arfordir Sir Benfro), established in 1952, takes in almost the entire coast of INFORMATION Like a little corner of California transplanted to Wales, Pembrokeshire is where the west Pembrokeshire and its offshore islands, as There are three national park visitor centres – meets the sea in a welter of surf and golden sand, a scenic extravaganza of spectacular sea well as the moorland hills of Mynydd Preseli in Tenby, St David’s and Newport – and a cliffs, seal-haunted islands and beautiful beaches. in the north. Its many attractions include a dozen tourist offices scattered across Pembro- scenic coastline of rugged cliffs with fantas- keshire. Pick up a copy of Coast to Coast (on- Among the top-three sunniest places in the UK, this wave-lashed western promontory is tically folded rock formations interspersed line at www.visitpembrokeshirecoast.com), one of the most popular holiday destinations in the country. Traditional bucket-and-spade with some of the best beaches in Wales, and the park’s free annual newspaper, which has seaside resorts like Tenby and Broad Haven alternate with picturesque harbour villages a profusion of wildlife – Pembrokeshire’s lots of information on park attractions, a cal- sea cliffs and islands support huge breeding endar of events and details of park-organised such as Solva and Porthgain, interspersed with long stretches of remote, roadless coastline populations of sea birds, while seals, dolphins, activities, including guided walks, themed frequented only by walkers and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Milford Haven Waterway Recreation Plan
    2016 Milford Haven Waterway 5 Year Recreation Management Plan 2 Foreword by the Harbourmaster The Port of Milford Haven aims to ensure that the diverse interests of all users are balanced in a way that promotes a safe, efficient and enjoyable environment. Having undergone several new developments in recent years, the Waterway has gained status as one of the largest oil and gas ports in Northern Europe, and whilst we are proud of the Port’s reputation as the UK’s Energy Capital, we are always keen to demonstrate how an increasing number of leisure users happily co- exist with the commercial traffic on the Waterway. Indeed, the majority of the 23 miles for which we are responsible, is devoted entirely to recreational use. The Milford Haven Waterway is famed for its sheltered, tidal waters, its diverse coastline and unique environmental qualities. Part of the only coastal national park in the UK, it is the largest estuary in Wales and recognised as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC). It is also a Waterway that has become a valuable resource for leisure enthusiasts. Focusing on this aspect of the Waterway, this document is the result of a collaborative approach to planning, monitoring and managing the Haven’s recreational opportunities. It offers clear guidance as to how the Port of Milford Haven actively engages with the Waterway’s community stakeholders and partner organisations in the delivery of a sustainable approach to safe and enjoyable water-borne recreation. W.C. Hirst Harbourmaster, Port of Milford Haven 3 4 Contents 1. Introduction 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Coastal Sea Caves, NSS News, October 1998
    California’s Coastal Sea Caves by Dave Bunnell Large chamber in Cave-in-Rock Cave, San Luis Obispo County elmets, lights, wetsuits, fins, face California, with its more accessible caves, are undoubtedly caves in Humboldt and Del masks and snorkels, vertical gear, has yielded as many again to the surveyor’s Norte counties, no survey work has been H and sea kayaks were not what I was tape and doubtless many more remain, undertaken there. I’ll begin with the southern used to packing for a cave trip until I especially in the remote northern counties. counties, for that was the original focus of moved to California. But after a couple of Much has been published over the years in sea cave survey. years of caving here, I realized that there were grotto and regional publications, but this is large numbers of caves here that had been the first time I’ve written an overall summary SAN DIEGO COUNTY largely ignored. After all, what caver wants of the Survey’s work on coastal caves. Perhaps the most famous of the sea caves to spend his weekends at the beach? on the California coast are the “seven caves” Systematic exploration and survey of GENERALITIES at La Jolla, formed in a 200’ high cliff of California’s many sea caves really began While not as large on average as the Cretaceous-age sandstone. A perennial when Carol Vesely and I chartered the island caves, the coastal caves are found in tourist favorite, La Jolla Cove and its cavey Southern California Sea Cave Survey in numerous host rocks that lend diverse cliffs are featured on dozens of old postcards.
    [Show full text]
  • Pembroke Power Station Environmental Permit
    Environment Agency appropriate assessment: Pembroke Power Station Environmental Permit Report – Final v 2.5 - 1 - PROTECT - Environmental Permit EA/EPR/DP3333TA/A001 Executive summary Purpose An ‘Appropriate Assessment’ (AA) as required by Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations (in accordance with the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), has been carried out on the application for an environmental permit for a 2100 MW natural gas-fired combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power station, near Pembroke. This Appropriate Assessment is required before the Environment Agency can grant an Environmental Permit and consider the implications of the environmental permit on the Pembrokeshire Marine / Sir Benfro Forol Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Afonydd Cleddau / Cleddau Rivers SAC. Approach The purpose of the AA is to ensure that the granting of an environmental permit does not result in damage to the natural habitats and species present on sites protected for their important wildlife. In this sense, the AA is similar to an environmental impact assessment with special focus on wildlife of international and national importance. In technical terms an, AA is a legal requirement to determine whether activities (not necessary for nature conservation) could adversely affect the integrity of the conservation site(s), either alone or in combination with other activities, and given the prevailing environmental conditions. It is required before the Agency, as a competent authority, can grant permission for the project. An adverse effect on integrity is one that undermines the coherence of a sites ecological structure and function, across its whole area, that enables the site to sustain the habitat, complex of habitats and/or levels of populations of the species for which the site is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Unit (4.5 Pts) Section
    T. James Noyes, El Camino College Beaches Unit (Topic 6A) – page 1 Name: Beaches Unit (4.5 pts) Section: Beaches and Shorelines are always changing Waves are slowly and inexorably altering the shoreline, breaking down material in some places and carrying it to other places. Each wave has a small effect, but waves keep coming minute after minute, day after day, year after year. Significant changes in the shoreline (tens of feet) can occur within a human lifetime. For example, old maps of Encinitas (located along the coastal cliffs by Interstate 5 on the way down to San Diego) show that it has lost about a city block of land to the sea in the last century. In some places along the coast of Alaska, the shoreline has eroded 900 meters in 50 years, an average of about 18 meters (60 feet) per year! Beach Sediments Beach sediments are composed of whatever sediments are available locally: sand, cobbles, gravel, coral fragments, shell fragments, and so on. (In fact, tiny plastic sediments are making up a larger and larger component of our beaches.) Beach sediments are characterized by (1) the kind of material that they are made out of, (2) their size, (3) their shape, and (4) their sorting. (Well sorted sediments all have about the same size and shape, while poorly sorted sediments are a jumbled mix of sediments with many different sizes and shapes. Lithogenous sediments (“rock sediments”) are produced from the weathering of the rock of the land. Rocks are broken down into pieces (sediments) by the physical impact of water, wind, and other rocks; by chemicals dissolved in water; and repeated heating and cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventure Sea Cave Kayak Tours on Santa Cruz Island at Scorpion Anchorage
    ADVENTURE SEA CAVE KAYAK TOURS ON SANTA CRUZ ISLAND AT SCORPION ANCHORAGE THIS IS NOT A BOOKING CONFIRMATION. The information below is only for reference. Please make sure to reference your booking confirmation sent via email for exact times and locations. If you have any questions please contact the Channel Islands Adventure Company - we will be happy to help you. Paddling Time and Distance 2.5-3 miles, 2.5-3 hours of island kayaking Tour Level of Difficulty Beginner through advanced experience levels welcome. Children under 12 must ride in double kayak with a parent. Adventure Sea Cave Kayak Tour Itinerary Your morning will begin at the Island Packers ferry dock for check-in at either 7am or 8am, depending on which ferry departure time you select (8am departure or 9am departure). You’ll want to look for Channel Islands Adventure Company guides just outside of the Island Packers building. Your guide will have your tickets. Detailed driving directions will be sent upon booking in your confirmation email. The ferry ride is generally 1-1.5 hour(s) depending on wildlife sightings. You’ll then meet your guide(s) on the island at 10:30am.We provide a basic paddling instruction/safety talk and distribute all necessary gear before hitting the water around 11:15am. Afterward we begin the guided paddle along the coast in one direction, exploring the sea caves as you go. At some point you turn around and come back past the landing area and explore in the other direction. You’ll return to the beach around 2:00-2:30pm, and have until about 3:30–4:30pm (your ferry captain or guide will tell you your pick-up time) before leaving the island.
    [Show full text]
  • NPWS Inishmore Island SAC (Site Code: 213) Conservation Objectives
    NPWS Inishmore Island SAC (site code: 213) Conservation objectives supporting document - Marine Habitats Version 1 January 2015 Introduction Inishmore Island SAC is designated for the marine Annex I qualifying interests of Reefs and Submerged or partially submerged sea caves (Figures 1 and 2). A BioMar survey of this site was carried out in 1993 (Picton and Costello, 1997), a seacave survey and intertidal and subtidal reef surveys were undertaken in 2012 (MERC, 2012 and MERC, 2013); these data were used to determine the physical and biological nature of this SAC. The distribution and ecology of intertidal or subtidal seacaves has not previously been the subject of scientific investigation in Ireland and the extents of very few individual caves have been mapped in detail. Whilst surveys undertaken in the UK indicate the structure and functions of seacaves are largely influenced by hydrodynamic forces and water quality, no such information is yet available for Ireland. Aspects of the biology and ecology of the Annex I habitat are provided in Section 1. The corresponding site-specific conservation objectives will facilitate Ireland delivering on its surveillance and reporting obligations under the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EC). Ireland also has an obligation to ensure that consent decisions concerning operations/activities planned for Natura 2000 sites are informed by an appropriate assessment where the likelihood of such operations or activities having a significant effect on the SAC cannot be excluded. Further ancillary information concerning the practical application of the site-specific objectives and targets in the completion of such assessments is provided in Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oce1001, Introduction to Oceanography, Fall, 2005
    OCE1001, INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY, Fall, 2018 THIRD MID-TERM EXAMINATION Test No. 0001 Name: __________________________ READ THIS!!!! Put your name in the blank above. Read all questions carefully, and answer only the question which is asked. You may find the following equations useful: C = (gL/2) = 1.25 L (m/s) Where: C = speed of a wave and: g = gravity = 9.8 m/s2 C = (gD) = 3.1 D (m/s) L = wavelength of a wave C = 1.56 T (m/s) D = water depth C = L/T T = period of a wave PLEASE WRITE NEATLY. Matching: The Beaches Are Moving (8 pts) Do not put these on the scantron sheet. ____ neap ____ hook A. worldwide change in sea level. B. structure intended to widen a beach. ____ jetty ____ groin C. wall intended to keep a channel open. D. two high and two low tides per day. ____ eustatic E. current parallel to the shore caused by waves. ____ semidiurnal F. twice monthly tide that with a smaller than average range. ____ marine terrace G. bend in end of a spit caused by wave refraction. ____ longshore current H. region eroded flat by waves, elevated above sea level. ____ longitudinal I. disturbance of wave is parallel to wave movement Multiple Choice: (2 pts each) Put the answers to these questions on the scantron sheet. 1. In Figure 1, the features labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are, respectively: a. spit, barrier island, baymouth bar, hook, tombolo. b. hook, spit, baymouth bar, barrier island, tombolo. c. tombolo, spit, baymouth bar, barrier island, hook.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave and Karst Inventory and Analysis
    Preliminary Report on the Caves and Karst of ROTA (LUTA), CNMI Thomas M. Keel1,2, John E. Mylroie1 & John W. Jenson2 i Technical Report No. 105 September 2004 Preliminary Report on the Caves and Karst of ROTA (LUTA), CNMI Thomas M. Keel1,2, John E. Mylroie1 & John W. Jenson2 1Department of Geosciences Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762 2Water and Environmental Research Institute of the Western Pacific University of Guam Mangilao, Guam 96923 Technical Report No. 105 Water & Environmental Research Institute of the Western Pacific University of Guam September, 2004 THE WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROGRAM OF THE US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, AWARD NO. 01HQGR0134, SUPPORTED THE WORK REPORTED HERE. THE CONTENT OF THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS AND POLICIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, NOR DOES THE MENTION OF TRADE NAMES OR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS CONSTITUTE THEIR ENDORSEMENT BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. i ABSTRACT The island of Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, contains caves developed by most of the mechanisms previously documented for similar islands. Rota has a large number of flank margin caves, developed by mixing dissolution, under diffuse flow conditions, at the edge of the fresh water lens. Rota has a few caves developed along the contact with the underlying volcanic rock. Rota also has a few caves formed primarily by the physical erosion of ocean waves. Unlike the other islands in the Mariana Arc, Rota has a large number of mixing zone fracture caves. These mixing zone fracture caves apparently developed as fresh water discharging from the fractures mixesd with sea water to create zones of enhanced dissolution in each fracture.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 ON THIS PAGE An opening in an ice-fringed sea cave reveals ice flows on Lake Superior. Photograph by Neil Howk (National Park Service) taken in winter 2008. ON THE COVER Wind and associated wave activity created a window in Devils Island Sandstone at Devils Island. Photograph by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich (Colorado State University) taken in summer 2010. Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 May 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4
    Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal- Water Ecology GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280-K Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal- Water Ecology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280-K Description and interpretation of the submarine topography and of the sediments^ biotas^ and morphology of the reef complex adjacent to a geologically diverse tropical island UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. S EATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280 Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands Part 1. General Geology A. General Geology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr., ROBERT GEORGE SCHMIDT, and HAROLD W. BURKE Part 2. Petrology and Soils B. Petrology of the Volcanic Rocks By ROBERT GEORGE SCHMIDT C. Petrography of the Limestones By J. HARLAN JOHNSON D. Soils By RALPH J. McCRACKEN Part 3. Paleontology E. Calcareous Algae By J. HARLAN JOHNSON F. Difcoaster and Some Related Microfossils By M. N. BRAMLETTE G. Eocene Radiolaria By WILLIAM RIEDEL H. Smaller Foraminifera By RUTH TODD I. Larger Foraminifera By W. STORRS COLE J. Echinoids By C. WYTHE COOKE Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal-Water Ecology K. Submarine Topography and Shoal-Water Ecology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_________________________________________ 361 Shoal-water and shoreline ecology and sediments—Con. Introduction. ______________________________________ 362 Habitat descriptions—Con. Purpose and scope of the work_____________________ 362 Organic reefs and reef benches______________ 383 Field methods and acknowledgments-_______________ 362 Minor reef structures______________________ 384 Systematic identifications and other research aid____ 363 Biotope X.
    [Show full text]
  • General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1
    General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1 Types of Coastlines: Type Description Primary Coast which is essentially in the same condition when sea level stabilized Coastline after the last ice age, “younger”. They are created by erosion (the wearing away of soil or rock), deposition (the buildup of sediment or sand) or tectonic activity (changes in the structure of the rock and soil because of earthquakes). River deltas are an example of a primary coast. They form where a river deposits soil and other material as it enters the sea. Secondary Coastline shaped primarily by marine forces or marine organisms, and wave Coastline energy is the main agent shaping the coastline. Emergent Emergent coastlines are stretches along the coast that have been exposed by Coastline the sea due to a relative fall in sea levels. Submergent Submergent coastlines are stretches along the coast that have been Coastline inundated by the sea due to a relative rise in sea levels. Concordant A coastline consisting of bands of rock, which run parallel to the coast. Coastline Discordant A discordant coastline occurs where bands of differing rock type run Coastline perpendicular to the coast. Factors affecting Wave Energy: Factor: Description Wind Speed Wind speed will in turn affect wind energy, which determines the size of the waves. Higher wind speed = Higher wind energy = Larger waves Fetch Fetch is the distance of the ocean which the wind blows over, Longer distance = Larger waves Wind How long the wind has blown in the same direction (steady winds at slower Duration
    [Show full text]