Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4 Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal- Water Ecology GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280-K Geology of Saipan Mariana Islands Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal- Water Ecology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280-K Description and interpretation of the submarine topography and of the sediments^ biotas^ and morphology of the reef complex adjacent to a geologically diverse tropical island UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. S EATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 280 Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands Part 1. General Geology A. General Geology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr., ROBERT GEORGE SCHMIDT, and HAROLD W. BURKE Part 2. Petrology and Soils B. Petrology of the Volcanic Rocks By ROBERT GEORGE SCHMIDT C. Petrography of the Limestones By J. HARLAN JOHNSON D. Soils By RALPH J. McCRACKEN Part 3. Paleontology E. Calcareous Algae By J. HARLAN JOHNSON F. Difcoaster and Some Related Microfossils By M. N. BRAMLETTE G. Eocene Radiolaria By WILLIAM RIEDEL H. Smaller Foraminifera By RUTH TODD I. Larger Foraminifera By W. STORRS COLE J. Echinoids By C. WYTHE COOKE Part 4. Submarine Topography and Shoal-Water Ecology K. Submarine Topography and Shoal-Water Ecology By PRESTON E. CLOUD, Jr. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_________________________________________ 361 Shoal-water and shoreline ecology and sediments—Con. Introduction. ______________________________________ 362 Habitat descriptions—Con. Purpose and scope of the work_____________________ 362 Organic reefs and reef benches______________ 383 Field methods and acknowledgments-_______________ 362 Minor reef structures______________________ 384 Systematic identifications and other research aid____ 363 Biotope X. Larger reef patches and reef clus­ Interpretation of the submarine topography__________ 363 ters of lagoon and offshore Significance of topographic criteria.-..______________ 363 shelf_______________ 384 Inferred structural pattern_______________________ 364 Peripheral reef surfaces______________________ 384 Gravity slides and density currents _________________ 364 Biotope XI. Lagoon fringe of northern barrier Shoal-water and shoreline ecology and sediments_____ 365 reef_________________ 385 General setting, procedure, and limitations_______ 365 Biotope XII. Reef flat of barrier reef and con­ Substrate characteristics and sediment distribution__ 368 tiguous fringing reef______ — 385 Description. _______________________________ 368 Biotope XIII. Narrow fringing reef of east, Comparison of sediments with those of other areas.. 371 north, and south coasts. _____ 385 Approach to ecologic analysis.. ____________________ 373 Reef front_________________________ 386 Broad ecologic pattern____________________________ 374 Biotope XIV. Reef front of barrier and fringing Organic community______ _________________________ 375 reefs_______________ 386 Habitat descriptions______________________________ 376 Shallow sea beyond the barrier reef_______________ 386 Shoreline. _______________________________ 376 Biotope XV. Limesand bottom___________ 387 Aggrading beach____________________________ 376 Biotope XVI. Interspersed reef patches and Western beaches____________._______ 376 limesand- ________________ 387 Southern and eastern beaches________________ 377 Nature of the organic reef complex________________ 387 Biota of the beaches_________-.___________ 377 Basic features___________________________________- 387 Eroding coast._______________________________ 377 Symbiosis and comparable associations ______________ 389 Bluffs.________________________ 377 Boring and imbedding organisms _________ __ ______ 391 Rubble coast______________________ 377 Other distinctive adaptations_____________________ 393 Erosion surfaces.___________________________ 378 Biogeography___ — ______ —— __——————————— 395 Biota of the eroding coast___ — ___———____ 378 Origin of sediments_____________________________-_ 397 Barrier reef lagoon and contiguous fringing reef Sediments of direct organic origin.__ — ___—_____ 397 moats. _.________________________ 378 Detrital sediments produced or modified by organ­ Lagoon proper and marginal limesand shelves. ___ 379 isms________________________——— 398 Biotope I. Marginal limesand bottom with Mechanical breakup of rock weakened by organic seaweed.____.__________ 379 agencies and solution________________________ 400 Biotope II. Shallow area of gravel trains with Sediments resulting from mechanical factors alone __ 400 scattered living coral and al­ Orientation of sediment trains and growth features gae———————————————— 380 parallel to current flow_____-____________-____-_- 400 Biotope III. Staghorn Acropora zone of outer Erosion and precipitation of calcium carbonate in the lagoon shelf_____________ 381 intertidal zone______________________________ 401 Biotope IV. Interspersed reef patches and Chemical factors______________________________ 401 limesand of lagoon proper. 381 Organic effects____________-_____-----____---__- 403 Biotope V. Dredged areas) mainly of lagoon Physical suggestions of intertidal solution __________ 403 proper.____________________ 382 Precipitation. __________________________________ 404 The contiguous moats_____________________ 382 Variation in characteristics of the peripheral reef flat Biotope VI. Outer moat floor of interspersed and reef front._______________________________ 405 coral-algal bosses with gravel Reef flat proper._______________________________ 405 and sand__------______--_-_ 383 Groove and spur system.________________________ 406 Biotope VII. Bottom matted with living coral­ Algal ridge and surge channels__________________ 410 line algae_________________ 383 Gross morphology and evolution of the reef complex.___ 410 Habitats common to lagoon and moat___________ 383 Concentric zonation___________________________-___ 410 Biotope VIII. Clean limesand with little or no Evolution__ ____________________________________ 411 seaweed-___________________ 383 References cited___-_-______--_-___-_-----_--_--_-_- 412 Biotope IX. Mixed limesand and calcareous Appendix.—Tabulation of animals and plants found in gravel at reef fringe of very the shoal marine habitats of Saipan_________________ 416 shallow lagoon or moat___.__ 383 Index.__________________________________ 443 VI CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 2 and 120-122 in pocket; plates 123-139 follow index] PLATE 2. Generalized geologic map and sections of Saipan, Mariana Islands. 120. Bathymetric and tectonic profiles adjacent to Saipan. 121. Bathymetric and tectonic chart, Saipan to Aguijan. 122. Shoal marine habitats of Saipan. 123. General views of western reef complex. 124. Reef patches, reef clusters, and transition of western barrier reef to fringing reef. 125. Western fringing reef ends, southern barrier reef complex, and examples of shoal marine erosion. 126. Close views of limesand bottom and staghorn Acropora zone. 127. Reef builders. 128. Some reef building and sediment forming algae. 129. Some distinctive reef-associated gastropods. 130. Work of sediment-producing fish. 131. Work of sediment-producing fish. 132. Fringing reefs with shallow moats and reef fronts with abundant grooves and spurs. 133. Erosional fringing benches with thin organic veneer and reef fronts with abundant grooves and spurs. 134. Surge channels and surfaces of fringing benches. 135. Fringing bench in volcanic conglomerate and groove and spur system on volcanic substratum. 136. Narrow fringing bench of limestone veneered with algae and vermetid gastropods, and reef front with tiered groove and spur system. 137. Narrow algal-veneered and pitted fringing surfaces and terraced ramp. 138. Terraced ramps and pedestals, blunt surge channels, and irregularly pitted low rocky shore with spray pools. 139. Reef veneering gastropods, terraced basins, and cove reef. Page FIGURE 36. Cumulative semilogarithmic screen analyses of representative shoal marine sediments of Saipan ____________ 366 37. Histograms of grain size of representative shoal marine sediments of Saipan——_—— ——— _________ ——— 367 38. Size-frequency distribution of 63 shoal sands from Saipan_.___________ — _____ —— __ — ___________——— 369 39. Sorting-frequency distribution of 64 shoal sediments from Saipan___ —— _________________________ —— — 369 40. Change in alkalinity components of sea water with changing pH______________________________________ 402 41. Reef front grooves and pits near station (?^________________________--_-----_-__--------_____----_____ 407 42. Reef front grooves, spurs, and pits between Susupe and Afetfia points.__________________________________ 408 43. Reef front grooves and spurs between Afetfia and Agingan points.._____-_-_--__-___---__-_____-__-_____ 409 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Shoal marine limesands of Saipan in order of increasing average coarseness____—___________ ——— ——— 371 2. Shoal marine limesands of Saipan in order of average sorting-_______--_____________---_-__-___----___-___ 371 3. Grain diameter and sorting characteristics of samples of shoal marine limesands from Saipan________ _________ 371 4. Summary of the identified marine organisms of Saipan____________——_________—__ —— _________ —— — 376 5. Numbers of mollusk and annelid species common to Saipan, Cocos-Keeling, and the Marshall Islands.________ 395 6. Classification and distinctive
Recommended publications
  • California's Coastal Sea Caves, NSS News, October 1998
    California’s Coastal Sea Caves by Dave Bunnell Large chamber in Cave-in-Rock Cave, San Luis Obispo County elmets, lights, wetsuits, fins, face California, with its more accessible caves, are undoubtedly caves in Humboldt and Del masks and snorkels, vertical gear, has yielded as many again to the surveyor’s Norte counties, no survey work has been H and sea kayaks were not what I was tape and doubtless many more remain, undertaken there. I’ll begin with the southern used to packing for a cave trip until I especially in the remote northern counties. counties, for that was the original focus of moved to California. But after a couple of Much has been published over the years in sea cave survey. years of caving here, I realized that there were grotto and regional publications, but this is large numbers of caves here that had been the first time I’ve written an overall summary SAN DIEGO COUNTY largely ignored. After all, what caver wants of the Survey’s work on coastal caves. Perhaps the most famous of the sea caves to spend his weekends at the beach? on the California coast are the “seven caves” Systematic exploration and survey of GENERALITIES at La Jolla, formed in a 200’ high cliff of California’s many sea caves really began While not as large on average as the Cretaceous-age sandstone. A perennial when Carol Vesely and I chartered the island caves, the coastal caves are found in tourist favorite, La Jolla Cove and its cavey Southern California Sea Cave Survey in numerous host rocks that lend diverse cliffs are featured on dozens of old postcards.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Chordates Part-I
    ORIGIN OF CHORDATES Evolution of chordate was one of the most important event in the history of chordate as it was the beginning of evolution of more advanced chordates like bird and mammals. It is the story of origin from a primitive invertebrate like creatures to early chordates. Though first fossil of the first vertebrate the ostrachoderm was discovered from the Ordovician period but it might have originated in late Cambrian period. As early chordates were soft bodied, their fossil records are not preserved. Hence, to trace their ancestry, we have to find out the similarity among different deuterostomes to trace the origin of chordates. Some structural features shared by them such as bilateral symmetry, antero-posterior body axis, triploblastic coelomate condition, etc., may he because of their common ancestry. TIME OF ORIGIN: Late Cambrian period PLACE OF ORIGIN: Fresh water THEORIES OF INVERTEBRATE ANCESTRY OF CHORDATES Several theories have been put forwarded to explain the origin of chordates either directly from some invertebrate group or through the intervention of some protochordate. Almost every invertebrate phylum—Coelenterata, Nemertean, Phoronida, Annelids, Arthropods and Echinodermatashas been suggested. But these theories are far from being satisfactory and convincing and have only a historical value. Only the echinoderm theory has received some acceptance. DIVISION OF BILATERIA The Bilateria is divided into two major divisions (1) Protostomia and (2) Deuterostornia. This division is based on the differences in embryonic and larval developments. Protostomia includes from Annelida to Arthropoda while deuterostomia includes Echinodermata, Pogonophora and Chordate. DEUTEROSTOME LINE OF CHORDATE EVOLUTION Following common features of all Deuterostomes suggests strong evidence of a closer evolutionary relationship between the three principal deuterostome phyla – Echinodermata, Hemichordata and Chordata.
    [Show full text]
  • ICES Marine Science Symposia
    ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 209-221. 1995 Decapod crustaceans in the diets of demersal fish in the Cantabrian Sea I. Olaso and E. Rodriguez-Marin Olaso, I., and Rodriguez-Marin, E. 1995. Decapod crustaceans in the diets of demer­ sal fish in the Cantabrian Sea. - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 209-221. The diets of 14 species of demersal fish, representing 81% of the fish biomass of the Cantabrian Sea (ICES Division VIIIc), were determined in the spring and autumn of 1988 from the analysis of 6536 stomachs. Decapod crustaceans represented 54.3% of the diet of these fish in frequency of occurrence and 22.1% in percentage by volume. The main prey taxa were: Solenocera membranacea, Alpeus glaber, the Crangonidae and Processidae families within the Natantia, the Paguridae and Galatheidae families within the Anomura, and Goneplax rhomboides and the Portunidae family within the Brachyura. Predator-prey linkages were described and each predator was assigned to the size group that would best demonstrate any size-related feeding pattern. I. Olaso and E. Rodriguez-Marin: Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Laboratorio Oceanogrâfico de Santander. Apdo240, 39080 Santander, Cantabria, Spain [tel: (+34) 42 2740431275033, fax: (+34) 42 275072], Introduction Studies of size, distribution, and abundance of prey and diet selection by predators were conducted because The Bay of Biscay forms a well-defined unit because of these parameters play a fundamental role in the selec­ its geographical location and semi-enclosed nature. The tion of diet and have the advantage of being easily southern part of this gulf, called the Cantabrian Sea, is a quantified (Murdoch and Oaken, 1975; Vince et al., transition zone and its fish and crustacean inhabitants 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Unit (4.5 Pts) Section
    T. James Noyes, El Camino College Beaches Unit (Topic 6A) – page 1 Name: Beaches Unit (4.5 pts) Section: Beaches and Shorelines are always changing Waves are slowly and inexorably altering the shoreline, breaking down material in some places and carrying it to other places. Each wave has a small effect, but waves keep coming minute after minute, day after day, year after year. Significant changes in the shoreline (tens of feet) can occur within a human lifetime. For example, old maps of Encinitas (located along the coastal cliffs by Interstate 5 on the way down to San Diego) show that it has lost about a city block of land to the sea in the last century. In some places along the coast of Alaska, the shoreline has eroded 900 meters in 50 years, an average of about 18 meters (60 feet) per year! Beach Sediments Beach sediments are composed of whatever sediments are available locally: sand, cobbles, gravel, coral fragments, shell fragments, and so on. (In fact, tiny plastic sediments are making up a larger and larger component of our beaches.) Beach sediments are characterized by (1) the kind of material that they are made out of, (2) their size, (3) their shape, and (4) their sorting. (Well sorted sediments all have about the same size and shape, while poorly sorted sediments are a jumbled mix of sediments with many different sizes and shapes. Lithogenous sediments (“rock sediments”) are produced from the weathering of the rock of the land. Rocks are broken down into pieces (sediments) by the physical impact of water, wind, and other rocks; by chemicals dissolved in water; and repeated heating and cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included
    Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Description of Antisabia Juliae Sp. Nov., New Hipponicid Gastropod Commensal on Turbo Spp
    SCI. MAR., 61 (Supl. 2): 5-14 SCIENTIA MARINA 1997 ECOLOGY OF MARINE MOLLUSCS. J.D. ROS and A. GUERRA (eds.) Biology and description of Antisabia juliae sp. nov., new Hipponicid gastropod commensal on Turbo spp. in Laing Island (Papua New Guinea)* MATHIEU POULICEK1, JEAN-CLAUDE BUSSERS1 and PIERRE VANDEWALLE2 1Animal Ecology Laboratory and 2Functional Morphology Laboratory, Zoological Institute, Liège University. 22, Quai Van Beneden, B-4020 Liège. Belgium. SUMMARY: The gastropod family Hipponicidae comprises widely distributed but poorly known sedentary species. On the beach-rock of the coral reefs of Laing Island (Papua New Guinea) live rich populations of several gastropod Turbo species of which many specimens have attached to their shell a hipponicid gastropod attributed to a new species, Antisabia juliae. This new species, described in this paper, appears to have adapted its mode of life on live turbinids in several ways result- ing in morphological changes (thin basal plate loosely adherent to the supporting shell, functional eyes, very long snout, functional radula, small osphradium) and ethological changes (foraging behaviour: it appears to feed on the epiphytic com- munity growing on the host, in the vicinity of the “host” shell). Except for these characteristics, the mode of life appears quite similar to that of other hipponicid species with few big females surrounded by several much smaller males. Development occurs within the egg mass inside the female shell and a few young snails escape at the crawling stage. Key words: Mollusca, Gastropoda, ecology, Hipponicidae, Papua New Guinea, Indopacific. RESUMEN: BIOLOGÍA Y DESCRIPCIÓN DE ANTISABIA JULIAE SP. NOV., UN NUEVO GASTERÓPODO HIPONÍCIDO COMENSAL DE TURBO SPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventure Sea Cave Kayak Tours on Santa Cruz Island at Scorpion Anchorage
    ADVENTURE SEA CAVE KAYAK TOURS ON SANTA CRUZ ISLAND AT SCORPION ANCHORAGE THIS IS NOT A BOOKING CONFIRMATION. The information below is only for reference. Please make sure to reference your booking confirmation sent via email for exact times and locations. If you have any questions please contact the Channel Islands Adventure Company - we will be happy to help you. Paddling Time and Distance 2.5-3 miles, 2.5-3 hours of island kayaking Tour Level of Difficulty Beginner through advanced experience levels welcome. Children under 12 must ride in double kayak with a parent. Adventure Sea Cave Kayak Tour Itinerary Your morning will begin at the Island Packers ferry dock for check-in at either 7am or 8am, depending on which ferry departure time you select (8am departure or 9am departure). You’ll want to look for Channel Islands Adventure Company guides just outside of the Island Packers building. Your guide will have your tickets. Detailed driving directions will be sent upon booking in your confirmation email. The ferry ride is generally 1-1.5 hour(s) depending on wildlife sightings. You’ll then meet your guide(s) on the island at 10:30am.We provide a basic paddling instruction/safety talk and distribute all necessary gear before hitting the water around 11:15am. Afterward we begin the guided paddle along the coast in one direction, exploring the sea caves as you go. At some point you turn around and come back past the landing area and explore in the other direction. You’ll return to the beach around 2:00-2:30pm, and have until about 3:30–4:30pm (your ferry captain or guide will tell you your pick-up time) before leaving the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Flora and Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina D Ela
    FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA D ELA Odjeljenje tehničkih nauka Knjiga 10/1 FOSILNA FLORA I FAUNA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE Ivan Soklić DOI: 10.5644/D2019.89 MONOGRAPHS VOLUME LXXXIX Department of Technical Sciences Volume 10/1 FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ivan Soklić Ivan Soklić – Fossil Flora and Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina Original title: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2001. Publisher Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina For the Publisher Academician Miloš Trifković Reviewers Dragoljub B. Đorđević Ivan Markešić Editor Enver Mandžić Translation Amra Gadžo Proofreading Amra Gadžo Correction Sabina Vejzagić DTP Zoran Buletić Print Dobra knjiga Sarajevo Circulation 200 Sarajevo 2019 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 57.07(497.6) SOKLIĆ, Ivan Fossil flora and fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina / Ivan Soklić ; [translation Amra Gadžo]. - Sarajevo : Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina = Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2019. - 861 str. : ilustr. ; 25 cm. - (Monographs / Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina ; vol. 89. Department of Technical Sciences ; vol. 10/1) Prijevod djela: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine. - Na spor. nasl. str.: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine. - Bibliografija: str. 711-740. - Registri. ISBN 9958-501-11-2 COBISS/BIH-ID 8839174 CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Family Stylodactylidae with the Description of a New Genus Neostylodactylus
    on the family Stylodactylidae with the description of a new genus Neostylodactylus Ken-Ichi HAYASHI and Sadayoshi MIYAKE Reprinted from the Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Vol. 14, No.4, November 30, 1968 Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Vol. 14, No. 4 November 30, 1968 Notes on the family Stylodactylidae with the description of a new genus Neostylodactylus^ Ken-Ichi HAYASHI and Sadayoshi MIYAKE The superfamily Stylodactyloidea is a very small group containing only one family with one genus Stylodactylus A. Milne Edwards (Holthuis, 1955). The species of this group are distinguishable from the other caridean shrimps by the following characters : the second maxilliped has the last two segments placed side by side at the end of the antepenultimate segment, the first and second pereiopods have the extremely long and slender fingers of the chela, and the third maxilliped and the first two pereiopods bear long setiferous hairs along their lower surface. The genus was established by A. Milne Edwards (1881) on a single species, Stylodactylus serratus, collected from Dominica, West Indies. Two years later A. Milne Edwards (1883) gave figures of another Atlantic species S. rectirostris, in addition to that of the former. Bate (1888) de- scribed three new species based upon the Challenger material, S. bimaxil- laris, S. discissipes and S. orientalis, of which the last is thought to be identical with the second. In 1920 de Man gave a list of all the species of Stylodacty- lus known at that time, including his two species, S. amarynthis and S. sibogae discovered in 1902 and 1918 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) from Korea
    Short communication Korean J. Syst. Zool. Vol. 27, No. 3: 262-267, November 2011 ISSN 2233-7687 http://dx.doi.org/10.5635/KJSZ.2011.27.3.262 Three Species of Processid Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) from Korea Jung Nyun Kim*, Jung Hwa Choi, Kangseok Hwang, Taeg Yun Oh, Kwang Ho Choi, Dong Woo Lee Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Busan 619-705, Korea ABSTRACT Three species of the family Processidae, Hayashidonus japonicus (De Haan, 1844), Processa sulcata Hayashi, 1975 and Processa zostericola Hayashi, 1975 described with illustrations from Korea. Two of these species, H. japonicus and P. zostericola, represent new records for the Korean carcinological fauna. The genus Haya- shidonus included the single species, H. japonicus is distinguished from other genera of Processidae by the broadly triangular rostrum, the obscure or absent dorsolateral spines of the telson, and the exceptionally long molar process of the mandible. Two species of the genus Processa, P. zostericola and P. sulcata are distin- guishable each other by presence or absence of an obtuse process of the basicerite of antenna on the antero- ventral margin. The basicerite of antenna arms with the obtuse process in P. zostericola, while in P. sulcata the basicerite of antenna lacks the process but is smooth on the ventral margin. A key to these species is pre- sented. Keywords: Hayashidonus japonicus, Processa sulcata, Processa zostericola, Processidae, Decapoda, Korea INTRODUCTION ed and illustrated, and an identification key is provided. The specimens described in this study were deposited in The family Processidae is characterized by a chelate right the National Fisheries Research and Development Institute first pereopod and a simple left pereopod usually terminating (NFRDI).
    [Show full text]
  • TREATISE ONLINE Number 48
    TREATISE ONLINE Number 48 Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31: Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia Joseph G. Carter, Peter J. Harries, Nikolaus Malchus, André F. Sartori, Laurie C. Anderson, Rüdiger Bieler, Arthur E. Bogan, Eugene V. Coan, John C. W. Cope, Simon M. Cragg, José R. García-March, Jørgen Hylleberg, Patricia Kelley, Karl Kleemann, Jiří Kříž, Christopher McRoberts, Paula M. Mikkelsen, John Pojeta, Jr., Peter W. Skelton, Ilya Tëmkin, Thomas Yancey, and Alexandra Zieritz 2012 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 2153-4012 (online) paleo.ku.edu/treatiseonline PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 31: ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY OF THE BIVALVIA JOSEPH G. CARTER,1 PETER J. HARRIES,2 NIKOLAUS MALCHUS,3 ANDRÉ F. SARTORI,4 LAURIE C. ANDERSON,5 RÜDIGER BIELER,6 ARTHUR E. BOGAN,7 EUGENE V. COAN,8 JOHN C. W. COPE,9 SIMON M. CRAgg,10 JOSÉ R. GARCÍA-MARCH,11 JØRGEN HYLLEBERG,12 PATRICIA KELLEY,13 KARL KLEEMAnn,14 JIřÍ KřÍž,15 CHRISTOPHER MCROBERTS,16 PAULA M. MIKKELSEN,17 JOHN POJETA, JR.,18 PETER W. SKELTON,19 ILYA TËMKIN,20 THOMAS YAncEY,21 and ALEXANDRA ZIERITZ22 [1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, [email protected]; 2University of South Florida, Tampa, USA, [email protected], [email protected]; 3Institut Català de Paleontologia (ICP), Catalunya, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 4Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 5South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, [email protected]; 6Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 7North
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Ground-Water Data for Tutuila and Aunuu, American Samoa, for October 1987 Through September 1997
    U.S. Department of the Interior Summary of Ground-Water Data for Tutuila and Aunuu, American Samoa, for October 1987 Through September 1997 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 99-252 OCEAN Bay Prepared In cooperation with the AMERICAN SAMOA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Summary of Ground-Water Data for Tutuila and Aunuu, American Samoa, for October 1987 Through September 1997 By Scot K. Izuka U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 99-252 Prepared in cooperation with the AMERICAN SAMOA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Honolulu, Hawaii 1999 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 677 Ala Moana Blvd., Suite 415 Box 25286 Honolulu, HI 96813 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................................................... 1 Setting...................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ............................................................................ 2 Rainfall .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]