DOCSLIB.ORG

Death and Reciprocity in Tsvetaeva 'S Poems to Rilke*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Death and Reciprocity in Tsvetaeva 'S Poems to Rilke* ALYSSA W. DINEGA (Notre Dame, IN, USA) THIRSTING FOR ANGELIC: DEATH AND RECIPROCITY IN TSVETAEVA 'S POEMS TO RILKE* The palm at the end of the mind, Beyond the last thought, rises In the bronze decor, A gold-feathered bird Sings in the palm, without human meaning, Without human feeling, a foreign song. Wallace Stevens, "Of Mere Being Just a few days after the death of Austrian poet Rainer Maria Rilke, Ma- rina Tsvetaeva recalled in a letter his experiments in writing poetry in French toward the end of his life: "He was tired of the language of his birth. He was weary of omnipotence, began longing for apprenticeship, seized the language . most inhospitable to poets - French ... and again he could, once more he could, and he immediately tired of it. The problem turned out to be not with German, but with Human. His thirst for French turned out to be a thirst for Angelic [Delo okazalos' ne v nemetskom, a v chelovecheskom. Zhazhda frantsuzskogo okazalas' zhazhdoi angel'skogo]."2 * This project was assisted by a grant from the Eurasia Program of the Social Science Re- search Council with funds provided by the State Department under the Program for Research and Training on Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (Title VIIn. This article is a revised and shortened version of a chapter in my book, "A Russian Psyche: The Poetic Mind of Marina Tsvetaeva," forthcoming from The University of Wisconsin Press, copy- right 2001.1. ' 1. Wallace Stevens, The Palm at the End of the Mind: Selected Paerns and a Play, ed. Holly Stevens (New York: Vintage Books, 1972), p. 398. ' 2. Marina Tsvetaeva, Sobranie sochinenii v semi tomakh (Moscow: Ellis. Lak, 1994-95), 6: 267. All translations from the original in this article are mine unless otherwise noted. Rilke was born in 1875 into the German minority community of Prague, which at the time was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. His lifelong interest in Slavic cultures was first piqued during his formative years in Prague. For a concise biography of Rilke and introduction to his works, see Patricia Pollock Brodsky, Ratner Maria Rilke (Boston: Twayne, 1988). For a discussion of the During the spring and summer of 1926, Rilke and Tsvetaeva had carried on an intense correspondence that had lapsed abruptly just a few months be- fore Rilke's death from leukemia at the end of December.3 Tsvetaeva had loved and revered Rilke since her youth; he was for her the very incarnation of Poetry (in her first letter to him she terms him "Poetry embodied"4). Although Rilke was one generation her senior, Tsvetaeva, who in any case never consented to the tyrannical limitations of time, interpreted his age more as a sign of his spiritual superiority than as any barrier to an equal friendship. Tsvetaeva's correspondence with Rilke has been largely ignored in the schol- arship on Rilke, but has been much discussed and debated in Tsvetaeva scholarship.5 Most commentators have read Tsvetaeva's and Rilke's letters to one another as an imbalanced contest between Tsvetaeva's importunate long- ing and Rilke's genteel, polite, but perturbed and detached resistance to her desires. Rilke's very willingness to engage in the correspondence at all has been viewed as a condescension to Tsvetaeva's perceived desperation. In my importance of Russia to Rilke, see Anna Tavis, Rilke's Russia: A Cultural Encounter (Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press, 1994). 3. The correspondence between Tsvetaeva and Rilke, all of which was conducted in German, is published in Rainer Maria Rilke, Marina Zwetajewa, Boris Pasternak,: Briefwechsel (Frank- furt am Main: Insel Verlag, 1983). Tsvetaeva had been trilingual in Russian, German, and French since early childhood, a fact which allowed her to read in a deeply meaningful way not only Rilke's German poetry, but also his French collection Vergers, which he sent to her shortly after its publication. For a perceptive discussion of how Tsvetaeva's trilingualism is evinced in her poetry, see Elizabeth Klosty Beaujour, Alien Tongues: Bilingual Russian Writers of the "First" Emigration (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1989). All in all, the known Tsvetaeva-Rilke corre- spondence includes nine letters and a postcard that Tsvetaeva wrote to Rilke during his lifetime; he sent her six letters and his "Elegy to Marina Tsvetaeva-Efron." 4. Briefwechsel, p. 105. 5. Konstantin Azadovskii [Asadowskij] provides a wealth of factual and background infor- mation in his notes and commentaries to both the German edition (Briefwechsel) and the Russian edition (Rainer Mariia Ril'ke, Boris Pasternak, Marina Tsvetaeva: Pis'ma 1926 goda [Moscow: Kniga, 1990]) of the Tsvetaeva-Rilke correspondence. For other commentaries, see Olga Peters Hasty, Tsvetaeva's Orphic Journeys in the Worlds of the Word (Evanston, IL: Northwestem Univ. Press, 1996), chs. 6 and 7; two works by Anna Tavis, "Russia in Rilke: Rainer Maria Rilke's Correspondence with Marina Tsvetaeva," Slavic Review 52, no. 3 (Fall 1993), 494-511 1 and Rilke's Russia: A Cultural Encounter, ch. 9; and Patricia Pollock Brodsky, "On Daring to Be a Poet: Rilke and Marina Cvetaeva" (Germano-Slavica 3, no. 4 [Fall 1980]), 261-69. Tavis's ref- erence to Tsvetaeva's "[increasing self-indulgence and] demands for personal intimacy (zhutkaia intimnost)" ("Russia in Rilke," p. 503) and Hasty's perception that Tsvetaeva is "aggressive" (p. 162) and that her "claims and demands" on Rilke amount to a "siege" (p. 161 ) are characteristic of the very strong language that, unfortunately, has often been used in relation to the Tsvetaeva- Rilke correspondence. Brodsky, on the contrary, provides a clear-sighted and balanced view of both correspondents: "Rilke found in Cvetaeva an unexpected and challenging late friendship; she found in him an artistic equal and a friend whose letters helped her survive her degradations" (p. 262). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nostalgia and the Myth of “Old Russia”: Russian Émigrés in Interwar Paris and Their Legacy in Contemporary Russia
    Nostalgia and the Myth of “Old Russia”: Russian Émigrés in Interwar Paris and Their Legacy in Contemporary Russia © 2014 Brad Alexander Gordon A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion Of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies at the Croft Institute for International Studies Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi April, 2014 Approved: Advisor: Dr. Joshua First Reader: Dr. William Schenck Reader: Dr. Valentina Iepuri 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………p. 3 Part I: Interwar Émigrés and Their Literary Contributions Introduction: The Russian Intelligentsia and the National Question………………….............................................................................................p. 4 Chapter 1: Russia’s Eschatological Quest: Longing for the Divine…………………………………………………………………………………p. 14 Chapter 2: Nature, Death, and the Peasant in Russian Literature and Art……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 26 Chapter 3: Tsvetaeva’s Tragedy and Tolstoi’s Triumph……………………………….........................................................................p. 36 Part II: The Émigrés Return Introduction: Nostalgia’s Role in Contemporary Literature and Film……………………………………………………………………………………p. 48 Chapter 4: “Old Russia” in Contemporary Literature: The Moral Dilemma and the Reemergence of the East-West Debate…………………………………………………………………………………p. 52 Chapter 5: Restoring Traditional Russia through Post-Soviet Film: Nostalgia, Reconciliation, and the Quest
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Tsvetaeva 1
    Marina Tsvetaeva 1 Marina Tsvetaeva Marina Tsvetaeva Tsvetaeva in 1925 Born Marina Ivanovna Tsvetaeva 8 October 1892 Moscow, Russian Empire Died 31 August 1941 (aged 48) Yelabuga, USSR Occupation Poet and writer Nationality Russian Education Sorbonne, Paris Literary movement Russian Symbolism Spouse(s) Sergei "Seryozha" Yakovlevich Efron Marina Ivanovna Tsvetaeva (Russian: Мари́на Ива́новна Цвета́ева; 8 October [O.S. 26 September] 1892 – 31 August 1941) was a Russian and Soviet poet. Her work is considered among some of the greatest in twentieth century Russian literature.[1] She lived through and wrote of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Moscow famine that followed it. In an attempt to save her daughter Irina from starvation, she placed her in a state orphanage in 1919, where she died of hunger. As an anti-Bolshevik supporter of Imperialism, Tsvetaeva was exiled in 1922, living with her family in increasing poverty in Paris, Berlin and Prague before returning to Moscow in 1939. Shunned and suspect, Tsvetaeva's isolation was compounded. Both her husband Sergey Efron and her daughter Ariadna Efron (Alya) were arrested for espionage in 1941; Alya served over eight years in prison and her husband was executed. Without means of support and in deep isolation, Tsvetaeva committed suicide in 1941. As a lyrical poet, her passion and daring linguistic experimentation mark her striking chronicler of her times and the depths of the human condition. Marina Tsvetaeva 2 Early years Marina Tsvetaeva was born in Moscow, her surname evokes association with flowers. Her father was Ivan Vladimirovich Tsvetaev, a professor of Fine Art at the University of Moscow,[1] who later founded the Alexander III Museum, which is now known as the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lyrical Subject As a Poet in the Works of M. Cvetaeva, B. Pasternak, and R.M
    Studi Slavistici x (2013): 129-148 Alessandro Achilli The Lyrical Subject as a Poet in the Works of M. Cvetaeva, B. Pasternak, and R.M. Rilke The human and poetic relationship between Marina Cvetaeva, Boris Pasternak and Rainer Maria Rilke has been one of the most challenging and fascinating issues of Slavic and comparative literature studies for several decades. Many books and essays have been written on the various aspects of this topic1, but it seems to be one of those inexhaustible themes on which scholars will continue to focus their attention for a long time to come. Before proceeding further, let us briefly recall some basic moments of their relation- ship. Reaching its peak in the Twenties, when the three writers exchanged letters and po- ems, their dialogue actually began in the previous decade. The symbolic significance of Pasternak’s first and only meeting with Rilke as a child, which he describes at the beginning of Oxrannaja gramota2, clearly hints at the fundamental meaning of the former’s readings of Mir zur Feier, Das Stunden-Buch and Das Buch von Bilder, and at the importance of their impact on the formation of Pasternak’s unique poetic manner in the years marked 1 The bibliography on this theme is very extensive. For the best, most recent and detailed account of Cvetaeva and Pasternak’s human and poetic relationship see Ciepiela 2006. For other contributions see Raevskaja-X’juz 1971, Taubman 1972, Ajzenštejn 2000 (a critical discussion of this monograph can be found in Gevorkjan 2012: 449-455), Baevskij 2004, El’nickaja 2000, Pasternak 2002, Thomson 1989, Taubman 1991, Shleyfer-Lavine 2011, Gasparov 1990, Polivanov 1992, Šmaina-Velikanova 2011, Nešumova 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Marina Tsvetaeva and Sophia Parnok Were Both Russian Poets Living During the First Half of the Twentieth Century
    Introduction Marina Tsvetaeva and Sophia Parnok were both Russian poets living during the first half of the twentieth century. Tsvetaeva is considered one of the most prominent poets of the Silver Age, and is recognized for her innovative and complex style. Parnok is far less well-known, by Russians and scholars alike, and the process of re-establishing her as a figure in Russian literary history began just thirty years ago, with the work of scholars that will be discussed below. What connects these two women is the affair they conducted from 1914 to 1916, and the poetry they wrote chronicling it. This paper endeavors to examine the poetry of Tsvetaeva and Parnok in the context of that relationship, and also to consider how their poetry and thought on queerness evolved afterwards. The theme of Tsvetaeva and Parnok’s relationship, particularly from the perspective of what Tsvetaeva wrote in her Подруга [Girlfriend] cycle, has been treated in a number of studies to date. However, there are three main works which examine both this specific relationship in detail, and the queer sexualities of Tsvetaeva and Parnok throughout their entire lives. Sophia Polyakova is credited both with the re-discovery and rehabilitation of Parnok as a poet worth studying, and of being the first to publish work on the relationship between her and Tsvetaeva. Using poetic analysis and archival research, her book Незакатные оны дни: Цветаева и Парнок [Those Unfading Days: Tsvetaeva and Parnok] puts together a cohesive story about events within the relationship, considering both the experience of the two women as well as that of their social circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity
    Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37945016 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity A dissertation presented by Alexandre Gontchar to The Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Slavic Languages and Literatures Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2017 ©2017– Alexandre Gontchar All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: William M. Todd Alexandre Gontchar Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity Abstract This dissertation shows how three Russian authors estranged and challenged the notion of human freedom as self-determination—the idea that meaningful self-authorship is possible in view of the finitude that every human being embodies under different aspects of his existence, such as the individual and collective awareness of the inevitability of death, as well as the narrative inclusion of any existential project within multiple contexts of history, culture, and language, all of which are always given already. At first glance to be free is to transcend these multiple limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Russians Abroad-Gotovo.Indd
    Russians abRoad Literary and Cultural Politics of diaspora (1919-1939) The Real Twentieth Century Series Editor – Thomas Seifrid (University of Southern California) Russians abRoad Literary and Cultural Politics of diaspora (1919-1939) GReta n. sLobin edited by Katerina Clark, nancy Condee, dan slobin, and Mark slobin Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: The bibliographic data for this title is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-214-9 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-61811-215-6 (electronic) Cover illustration by A. Remizov from "Teatr," Center for Russian Culture, Amherst College. Cover design by Ivan Grave. Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013. 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open. Published by Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Table of Contents Foreword by Galin Tihanov .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interview on Anna Akhmatova
    The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library INTERVIEW ON ANNA AKHMATOVA This text is based on a translation by Helen Rappaport of a complete transcript (made by Robin Hessman from a videotape) of an unedited interview filmed in April 1989 at Berlin’s Oxford home, Headington House. The interviewer, the late Vsevolod Georgievich Shishkovsky, was London correspondent of Russian State TV and Radio. Excerpts from the interview (here identified in red where known) were used on Russian TV: see catalogue of broadcasts, items 80 and 80a. The late Elena Tsezarenva Chukovskaya was also present, and joins in at the end. VSEVOLOD SHISHKOVSKY In our country the one hundredth anniversary of the birth of our famous poetess Anna Akhmatova is being widely celebrated. And at the moment, we are attempting, literally, to the nth degree, to gather together everything connected with her life, her work, her encounters, and I think that your reminiscences of those meetings with her have an absolutely priceless significance, and I know that you are well acquainted with the work of Anna Akhmatova, and that you met her. And so, might you recount your first meeting with her? ISAIAH BERLIN You called her a poetess. She despised that word. She called herself a poet. She did not acknowledge any poetesses, neither herself, nor Tsvetaeva, nor others. This is incidental. But I remember it. She was very angry about it, she said: ‘Yes, yes, they call me a poetess’, she said this in a very angry tone. I wrote an article about it,1 which appeared in English, and which has now been translated into Russian.2 It’s all probably very clearly 1 ‘Meetings with Russian Writers in 1945 and 1956’, in PI.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorokin's Tridtsataia Liubov' Mariny and Tsvetaeva's Krysolov
    When Non-Negotiation is the Norm: Sorokin’s Tridtsataia liubov’ Mariny and Tsvetaeva’s Krysolov Karin Grelz Сложные взаимоотношения с чужим словом во всех сферах культуры и деятельности наполняют всю жизнь человека.1 Marina Tsvetaeva’s Krysolov (The Ratcatcher) and Vladimir Sorokin’s Tridtsataia liubov’ Mariny (Marina’s Thirtieth Love) are two innovative literary works in which the authors use the clashes of values and the on- going negotiations in everyday, vernacular Russian of their time for their own artistic purposes. Although one is representative of modernist and the other of postmodernist aesthetic practices, both relate to language as a producer of communal values, and both texts appear to be born out of an experience of suspicion of, or distrust in, the communicative situation as such. The second being apparently modelled upon the first — as will be suggested in the following — both works can be interpreted as decla- rations of a non-negotiative standpoint when it comes to the aesthetic dimension, and as demonstrations of the artist’s ability to escape, by the force of his or her own word, the world of social and ideological conflict and value-laden social languages. Marina’s Thirtieth Love Vladimir Sorokin’s Tridtsataia liubov’ Mariny is dated as written be- tween 1982 and 1984, and the action is set in 1983.2 By this time the 1 Mikhail Bakhtin, 1986, Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva, Moscow, p. 367. 2 Vladimir Sorokin, 1998, Sobranie sochinenii v dvukh tomakh, vol. 1, Moscow, pp. 595–798. Quotations from Tridtsataia liubov’ Mariny, abbreviated tlm, refer to this edition, with page numbers in brackets.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones Also by Marina Tsvetaeva in Christopher Whyte’S Translation
    Milestones Also by Marina Tsvetaeva in Christopher Whyte’s translation Moscow in the Plague Year (Archipelago, New York) Marina Tsvetaeva Milestones translated from the Russian by Christopher Whyte Shearsman Books First published in the United Kingdom in 2015 by Shearsman Books 50 Westons Hill Drive Emersons Green BRISTOL BS16 7DF Shearsman Books Ltd Registered Office 30–31 St. James Place, Mangotsfield, Bristol BS16 9JB (this address not for correspondence) www.shearsman.com ISBN 978-1-84861-416-1 Copyright © Christopher Whyte, 2015. The right of Christopher Whyte to be identified as the translator of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act of 1988. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction 9 Milestones (first published 1922) ‘I opened the small iron box’ 27 ‘I planted a young apple tree’ 28 ‘I went out to the lake. Its banks were steep’ 29 ‘No-one went off with anything!’ 30 ‘Seeing off the ones I love’ 31 ‘You throw your head back when you laugh’ 32 ‘What can it be disarms me so?’ 33 ‘The mirror shattered into silver’ 34 ‘Snow takes more than a day to melt’ 35 ‘Silver doves, scattering, soar in the evening sky’ 36 ‘Never stop making up’ 37 ‘Before autumn, no giddy wind’ 38 ‘Ruined by a woman. Look’ 39 ‘The strangest malady took hold of him’ 40 ‘My canopies are covered with’ 41 ‘I go out to the porch and listen’ 42 ‘On Annunciation day’ 43 ‘Tomorrow’s the Annunciation’ 44 ‘In your fourth year’ 47 ‘Checking the girls, so in the jug the kvass’ 49 ‘Dimitry! Marina! In all the world’ 50 Poems about Moscow 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Tsvetaeva: What Does It Take to Be a Swan?
    Max Popelysh-Rosochinsky Marina Tsvetaeva: What Does It Take to Be a Swan? Introduction and Stage-Setting Critics tend to agree that Marina Tsvetayeva rejects the Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917.1 They differ in their explanation of why she does this. The most widespread interpretation is biographical: Tsvetaeva’s husband Sergey Efron was a White Army officer. This interpretation is treated as a master-key that opens many doors at once. Tsvetaeva identifies with the White Movement, likes the Tsar, hates the Revolution, and writes The Demesne of the Swans – all because her husband was an officer in the White Army. The biographical explanation is not necessarily wrong. Yet it is underdetermined. It might well capture Tsvetaeva’s motivation, but it does not explain the poetic choices Tsvetaeva makes in her rejection of the Revolution. The biographical interpretations may also focus on Tsvetaeva’s character and provide illuminating observations about the types of people or figures that tend to attract Tsvetaeva, provoke her admiration and, in some cases, intense passion. For example, in her book Marina Tsvetaeva: the Double Beat of Heaven and Hell, Lily Feiler suggests that Tsvetaeva rejects the Revolution because of her Romantic tendency to sympathize with the persecuted. If Tsvetaeva does have such a tendency, it remains to be explained what underlies it. There are some attractive options: Tsvetaeva’s gender, motherhood, religious beliefs. All of these factors could shape Tsvetaeva’s poetics. However, we are hard pressed to find such an explanation in Feiler’s book. The biographical interpretations help us 1 Her attitude to the February Revolution may be a lot more positive.
    [Show full text]
  • Bypassing Death: the Last Poems of Nikolai Gumilev, Nikolai Otsup, Marina Tsvetaeva and Anna Akhmatova
    Alexandra Smith Bypassing Death: The Last Poems of Nikolai Gumilev, Nikolai Otsup, Marina Tsvetaeva and Anna Akhmatova Iurii Kazarin, the compiler and editor of the forthcoming anthology of Russian last poems, has included into his book one hundred poems written in the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries. Kazarin’s anthol- ogy comprises 12 eighteenth-century poets; 38 nineteenth-century poets; and 50 twentieth-century poets. According to Kazarin’s preliminary study, it is possible to detect a certain paradigm out of the selected texts that can be characterised both as the pivotal representation of po- etic persona of each individual poet and of the collective self of the Rus- sian poet.1 Kazarin’s anthology illustrates very well that all Russian poets of significance, in anticipation of their death, tend to write poems that can be defined as their last words. Such poems immortalise the poet’s self-fashioned image, influenced by the eschatological tradition of Russian poetry and shaped by the specifics of the Russian language. In Khazarin’s view, the last poem is a phenomenon that can be defined in general terms as a combination of linguistic, cultural, spiritual and exis- tential factors. The last poem is usually double-edged: it marks the end of poet’s physical existence and it also points to the poet’s immortality. In these last texts, the poet aspires to transfer his physical body, his voice, his entire personality in a finalised manner, as if he becomes one with the elements and with the poetic speech itself. As Khazarin aptly suggests, ‘his poems contain almost the entire self of the poet [.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Silver Age Poetry: Texts and Contexts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Works Swarthmore College Works Russian Faculty Works Russian 2015 Russian Silver Age Poetry: Texts And Contexts Sibelan E. S. Forrester Swarthmore College, [email protected] M. Kelly Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-russian Part of the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Sibelan E. S. Forrester and M. Kelly. (2015). "Russian Silver Age Poetry: Texts And Contexts". Russian Silver Age Poetry: Texts And Contexts. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-russian/160 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION: POETRY OF THE RUSSIAN SILVER AGE Sibelan Forrester and Martha Kelly oetry is only one of the exciting cultural achievements of the Russian Pfin-de-siècle, which has come to be known as the Silver Age. Along with the Ballets russes, the music of Alexander Scriabin or Igor Stravinsky, the avant- garde painting of Kazimir Malevich or Marc Chagall, and the philosophical writings of Lev Shestov or Nikolai Berdyaev, poetry is one of the era’s most precious treasures. The Silver Age witnessed an unprecedented and fruitful interaction between Russian literature and the other arts, sometimes within the same person: several of the major poets were (or could have been) musi- cians and composers; others were painters, important literary critics, religious thinkers, scholars, or philosophers.
    [Show full text]