DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution and Endemism of Butterfly Species Recorded During the Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution and Endemism of Butterfly Species Recorded During the Study Appendix 3.1: Distribution and endemism of butterfly species recorded during the study a Family: Logged Pinus Common name Species Endemism Primary Home Subfamily forest forest plantations Acraeidae Tawny Coaster Telchinia violae Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Black Angle Tapena thwaitesi thwaitesi Not endemic 0 0 x x Hesperiidae Black Flat Celaenorrhinus spilothyrus Not endemic x x x x Hesperiidae Blank Swift Catloris kumara lanka Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Hesperiidae Brown Awl Badamia exclamationis Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Hesperiidae Bush Hopper Ampittia dioscorides singa Not endemic 0 0 x x Hesperiidae Ceylon Palm bob Suastus minuta minuta Not endemic 0 x x 0 Hesperiidae Ceylon Ace Halpe homolea ceylonica Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Ceylon Awl Hasora badra lanka Not endemic x x x x Hesperiidae Ceylon Snow Flat Tagiades japetus obscurus Not endemic x 0 x x Hesperiidae Chestnut bob Lambrix salsala luteipalpus Not endemic 0 0 x x x x x x Hesperiidae Common banded demon Notocrypta paralysos alysia Not endemic Hesperiidae Common dart Potanthus pseudomaesa Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Common grass dart Taractrocera maevius Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Dark Cerulean Oriens goloides Not endemic x x x x Hesperiidae Decorated Ace Thoressa decorata Endemic 0 x x 0 Hesperiidae Hedge Hopper Baracus vittatus vittatus Not endemic 0 x x 0 Hesperiidae Indian dart Potanthus pallida Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Indian Palmbob Suastus gremius subgrisea Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Indian Skipper Spialia galba Not endemic 0 0 x 3 Hesperiidae Pale Small-branded Swift Pelopidas thrax Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Philippine Swift Catloris philippina seriata Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Restricted demon Notocrypta curvifascia Not endemic x x 0 0 Hesperiidae Smallest Swift Panara bada bada Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Tree Flitter Hyarotis adrastus adrastus Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Hesperiidae Tropic Dart Potanthus confucius satra Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Hesperiidae Water Snow Flat Tagiades litigiosa ceylonica Not endemic x x x x Hesperiidae White banded Awl Hasora taminatus taminatus Not endemic x 0 0 0 Libytheidae Club Beak Libythea myrrha rama Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Aberrant Bush blue Arhopala abseus mackwoodi Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Lycaenidae Angled pierrot Caleta decidia Not endemic 0 x x x Lycaenidae Banded blue pierrot Discolampa ethion ethion Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Lycaenidae Ceylon Cerulean Jamides coruscans Endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Common Cerulean Jamides celeno tissama Not endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Common Lineblue Prosotas nora ardates Not endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Common pierrot Castalius rosimon Not endemic 0 x x x Lycaenidae Common Imperial Cheritra freja pseudojaffra Not endemic 0 0 x x Lycaenidae Dark Ceylon 6-lineblue Catopsilia crocale Not endemic x x 0 0 Lycaenidae Indian Cupid Everes lacturnus parrhasius Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Indian Sunbeam Curetis thetis Not endemic x 0 x 0 Lycaenidae Large 4-lineblue Nacaduba pactolus ceylonica Not endemic x 0 0 0 178 Lycaenidae Lime Blue Chilades lajus lajus Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Long banded silver-line Spindasis lohita lazularia Not endemic x 0 0 0 Lycaenidae Malayan Megisba malaya Not endemic 0 0 x x Lycaenidae Metallic Cerulean Jamides alecto meilichius Not endemic 0 x x x Lycaenidae Milky Cerulean Jamides lacteata Not endemic x 0 x 0 Lycaenidae Monkey-puzzle Rathinda amor Endemic 0 0 x 0 Lycaenidae Nigger Orsotriaena medus mandata Not endemic 0 0 x x Lycaenidae Nilgiri Tit Hypolycaena nilgirica Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Lycaenidae One sport Grass Yellow Eurema ormistoni Endemic x x 0 x Lycaenidae Opaque 6-lineblue Nacaduba beroe minima Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Painted Saw-tooth Prioneris sita Not endemic x 0 0 0 Lycaenidae Pale Ceylon 6-lineblue Nacaduba sinhala Endemic x x 0 x Lycaenidae Peacock Royal Tajuria cippus longinu Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Plain Hedgeblue Celestrina lavendularis Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Lycaenidae Pointed Ciliated blue Anthene lycaenina lycaenina Not endemic 0 x x 0 Lycaenidae Read pierrot Talicada nyseus nyseus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Lycaenidae Red Helen Papilio helenus mooreanus Not endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Rustic Cupha erymanthis placida Not endemic 0 x x x Lycaenidae Slate Flash Rapala manea schistacea Not endemic x 0 0 0 Lycaenidae Tailed jay Graphium agamemnon menides Not endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Three sport Grass Yellow Eurema blanda silhetana Not endemic x x x x Lycaenidae Tiny Grass blue Zizula hylax hylax Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Lycaenidae Yamfly Loxura atymnus arcuata Not endemic 0 0 x x Nymphalidae Baron Euthalia aconthea vasanta Not endemic 0 0 x x Nymphalidae Black Prince Rohana parisatis camiba Not endemic x 0 0 0 Nymphalidae Blue Admiral Blue Admiral Not endemic 0 x 0 0 Nymphalidae Blue Oak leaf Kallima philarchus philarchus Endemic 0 x 0 0 Nymphalidae Chestnut Streaked Sailor Neptis jumbah nalanda Not endemic x x x x Nymphalidae Chocolate Soldier Junonia iphita pluviatalis Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Nymphalidae Clipper Parthenos sylvia cyaneus Not endemic x x x x Nymphalidae Common Lascar Pantoporia hordonia sinuata Not endemic 0 0 x x Nymphalidae Common Nawab Polyura athamas Not endemic x 0 0 0 Pachliopta aristolochiae Nymphalidae Common Rose Not endemic 0 x x x ceylonica Nymphalidae Common Sailor Neptis hylas varmona Not endemic x x x x Nymphalidae Commander Moduza procris calidasa Not endemic x x x x Nymphalidae Crimson Rose Pachliopta hector Not endemic 0 0 0 x Nymphalidae Cruiser Vindula erota asela Not endemic 0 x x x Nymphalidae Gaudy Baron Euthalia lubentina psittacus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Nymphalidae Great Egg fly Hypolimnas bolina Not endemic x x x 0 Nymphalidae Grey Pansy Junonia atlites Not endemic 0 x x 0 Nymphalidae Leopard Phalanta phalanta Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Nymphalidae Pea Blue Lampides boeticus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Nymphalidae Red Spot Duke Dophla evelina evelina Not endemic x x x x Nymphalidae Tamil Yeoman Cirrochroa thais lanka Not endemic x x x 0 179 Nymphalidae Tawny Rajah Charaxes psaphon Not endemic 0 x x 0 Nymphalidae Ceylon Lace wing Cethosia nietneri Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Nymphalidae: Blue Glassy Tiger Ideopsis similis exprompta Not endemic 0 x x x Danaidae Nymphalidae: Blue tiger Tirumala limniace leopardus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Danaidae Nymphalidae: Ceylon Tree nymph Idea iasonia Endemic x x x x Danaidae Nymphalidae: Common Crow Euploea core asela Not endemic x x x x Danaidae Nymphalidae: Glassy Tiger Parantica aglea Not endemic 0 x x x Danaidae Nymphalidae: Great Crow Euploea phaenareta corus Not endemic 0 x x 0 Danaidae Nymphalidae: Southern duffer Discophora lepida ceylonica Not endemic 0 0 0 x Morphinae Nymphalidae: Ceylon Forester Lethe dynsate Endemic x 0 0 0 Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Ceylon Palmfly Elymnias singala Endemic 0 0 x 0 Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Cingalese Bushbrown Mycalesis rama Endemic 0 0 0 x Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Common Evening Brown Melanitis lede ismene Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Common Palmfly Elymnias hypermnestra fraterna Not endemic 0 0 x x Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Comon Bushbrown Mycalesis perseus typhlus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Dark Evening Brown Melanitis phedima tambra Not endemic x x 0 x Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Gladeye Bushbrown Nissanga patnia patnia Not endemic x x x x Satyrinae Nymphalidae: Mottled Immigrant Catopsilia pyranthe minna Not endemic 0 x x 0 Satyrinae Nymphalidae: White Four-ring Ypthima ceylonica Not endemic 0 x x x Satyrinae Papilionidae Banded Peacock Papilio crino Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Papilionidae Blue Mormon Papilio polymnestor parinda Not endemic x x x x Papilionidae Bluebottle Graphium sarpedon teredon Not endemic x x x x Papilionidae Ceylon Birdwing Troides darsius Endemic 0 x x x Papilionidae Ceylon Rose Pachliopta jophon Endemic 0 x x x Papilionidae Common jay Graphium doson Not endemic x x x x Papilionidae Common mime Chilasa clytia lankeswara Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Papilionidae Common Mormon Papilio polytes romulus Not endemic 0 x x x Papilionidae Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus demoleus Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Pieridae Common Albatross Appias albina darada Not endemic 0 0 x x Pieridae Common Grass Yellow Leptosia nina nina Not endemic 0 x x x Pieridae Jezebel Delias eucharis Not endemic x 0 x x Pieridae Lemon emigrant Catopsilia pomona Not endemic x x x 0 Pieridae Lesser Albatross Appias galene Not endemic x x x x Pieridae Psyche Leptosia nina nina Not endemic 0 0 x 0 Riodinidae Plum judy Abisara echerius prunosa Not endemic x x 0 x a x = presence; 0= absence of an individual species in a given habitat 180 Appendix 3.2: Species accumulation curves for butterflies (a) (b) (c) Appendix 3.2: Species accumulation curves (a); population abundance curves (b); and rarefaction curves (c); for butterflies in sampled habitat types. 181 Appendix 3.3 – Summary statistic of the multi-response permutation procedure Habitat T A P Butterflies Average within-group distance PF 0.315 SLF 0.443 HG 0.350 PP 0.283 Multiple pair-wise comparisons PF vs. SLF -7.807 0.075 <0.001 PF vs. HG -31.186 0.357 <0.001 PF vs. PP -25.279 0.268 <0.001 SLF vs. HG -20.643 0.212 <0.001 SLF vs. PP -14.322 0.138 <0.001 HG vs. PP -16.208 0.166 <0.001 Amphibians Average within-group distance PF 0.184 SLF 0.212 HG 0.316 PP 7.38E-02 Multiple pair-wise comparisons PF vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Variation in Butterfly Diversity and Unique Species Richness Along
    Check List 8(3): 432-436, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution PECIES S OF Sanctuary,Variation in Tripura, butterfly northeast diversity India and unique species ISTS L richness along different habitats in Trishna Wildlife * Joydeb Majumder, Rahul Lodh and B. K. Agarwala [email protected] Tripura University, Department of Zoology, Ecology and Biodiversity Laboratories, Suryamaninagar – 799 022, Tripura, India. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: Quantification of butterfly diversity and species richness is of prime importance for evaluating the status of protected areas. Permanent line transect counts were used to record species richness and abundance of butterfly communities of different habitat types in Trishna wildlife sanctuary. A total of 1005 individuals representing 59 species in 48 genera belonging to five families were recorded in the present study. Of these, 23 species belonged to the family Nymphalidae and accounted for 38.98% of the total species and 45.20% of the total number of individuals. Mature secondary mixed moist deciduous forest showed the maximum diversity and species richness, while exotic grassland showed minimum diversity and species richness. Out of 59 species, 31 are new records for Tripura state, while 21 are unique species and nine are listed in the threatened category. This study revealed that mature secondary forests are more important for butterfly communities, while exotic grasslands have a negative impact on species composition. Introduction state of Tripura (10,490 sq km), in northeastern India In the humid tropics, due to deforestation of primary (Mandal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Compilation and Analysis of Food Plants Utilization of Sri Lankan Butterfly Larvae (Papilionoidea)
    MAJOR ARTICLE TAPROBANICA, ISSN 1800–427X. August, 2014. Vol. 06, No. 02: pp. 110–131, pls. 12, 13. © Research Center for Climate Change, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia & Taprobanica Private Limited, Homagama, Sri Lanka http://www.sljol.info/index.php/tapro A COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF FOOD PLANTS UTILIZATION OF SRI LANKAN BUTTERFLY LARVAE (PAPILIONOIDEA) Section Editors: Jeffrey Miller & James L. Reveal Submitted: 08 Dec. 2013, Accepted: 15 Mar. 2014 H. D. Jayasinghe1,2, S. S. Rajapaksha1, C. de Alwis1 1Butterfly Conservation Society of Sri Lanka, 762/A, Yatihena, Malwana, Sri Lanka 2 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Larval food plants (LFPs) of Sri Lankan butterflies are poorly documented in the historical literature and there is a great need to identify LFPs in conservation perspectives. Therefore, the current study was designed and carried out during the past decade. A list of LFPs for 207 butterfly species (Super family Papilionoidea) of Sri Lanka is presented based on local studies and includes 785 plant-butterfly combinations and 480 plant species. Many of these combinations are reported for the first time in Sri Lanka. The impact of introducing new plants on the dynamics of abundance and distribution of butterflies, the possibility of butterflies being pests on crops, and observations of LFPs of rare butterfly species, are discussed. This information is crucial for the conservation management of the butterfly fauna in Sri Lanka. Key words: conservation, crops, larval food plants (LFPs), pests, plant-butterfly combination. Introduction Butterflies go through complete metamorphosis 1949). As all herbivorous insects show some and have two stages of food consumtion.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve
    Some Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Some by Aniruddha Dhamorikar Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Aniruddha Dhamorikar 1 2 Study of some Insect orders (Insecta) and Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Kanha Tiger Reserve by The Corbett Foundation Project investigator Aniruddha Dhamorikar Expert advisors Kedar Gore Dr Amol Patwardhan Dr Ashish Tiple Declaration This report is submitted in the fulfillment of the project initiated by The Corbett Foundation under the permission received from the PCCF (Wildlife), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, communication code क्रम 車क/ तकनीकी-I / 386 dated January 20, 2014. Kanha Office Admin office Village Baherakhar, P.O. Nikkum 81-88, Atlanta, 8th Floor, 209, Dist Balaghat, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh 481116 Maharashtra 400021 Tel.: +91 7636290300 Tel.: +91 22 614666400 [email protected] www.corbettfoundation.org 3 Some Insects and Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve by Aniruddha Dhamorikar © The Corbett Foundation. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form (electronic and in print) for commercial purposes. This book is meant for educational purposes only, and can be reproduced or transmitted electronically or in print with due credit to the author and the publisher. All images are © Aniruddha Dhamorikar unless otherwise mentioned. Image credits (used under Creative Commons): Amol Patwardhan: Mottled emigrant (plate 1.l) Dinesh Valke: Whirligig beetle (plate 10.h) Jeffrey W. Lotz: Kerria lacca (plate 14.o) Piotr Naskrecki, Bud bug (plate 17.e) Beatriz Moisset: Sweat bee (plate 26.h) Lindsay Condon: Mole cricket (plate 28.l) Ashish Tiple: Common hooktail (plate 29.d) Ashish Tiple: Common clubtail (plate 29.e) Aleksandr: Lacewing larva (plate 34.c) Jeff Holman: Flea (plate 35.j) Kosta Mumcuoglu: Louse (plate 35.m) Erturac: Flea (plate 35.n) Cover: Amyciaea forticeps preying on Oecophylla smargdina, with a kleptoparasitic Phorid fly sharing in the meal.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES L ANALYSIS ARTICLE
    SPECIES l ANALYSIS ARTICLE Species Diversity and distribution of 22(69), 2021 butterflies in Maragamuwa forest regeneration study site, Matale, Sri Lanka Buddhika Weerakoon, Kithsiri Ranawana To Cite: Weerakoon B, Ranawana K. Diversity and distribution ABSTRACT of butterflies in Maragamuwa forest regeneration Maragamuwa Forest Regeneration Study Site was established in a harvested study site, Matale, Sri Lanka. Species, 2021, 22(69), 118- eucalypt plantation (70 41’ 39.16” N - 800 42’ 31.58” E) in the intermediate zone 124 of Sri Lanka Based on the age from the disturbance, two vegetation types could be identified as early secondary forest (ESF) and late secondary forest Author Affiliation: (LSF). Abundance, Occurrence and diversity of butterflies were monitored for Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka two years. The Gamma (γ) diversity of the areas is 100 species in six families with four endemics. Highest abundance was recorded in ESF (n= 2963), while Corresponding author: highest species richness was recorded in LSF (n= 76). Alpha (α) diversity of Buddhika Weerakoon, 10, Dodamgolla, Menikhinna, LSF was higher than ESF. A statistically significant difference in butterfly Sri Lanka. 20170. +94713391713, diversity was recorded in two forests (p<0.001). Several indicator species were [email protected] identified for each forest type. Indicator species of ESF were small and indicators for LSF were large butterflies. Few new records to the region were Peer-Review History identified during the study. Findings of the study showcase the value of long Received: 26 February 2021 Reviewed & Revised: 27/February/2021 to term studies and can be used as a fundamental tool for planning future 07/April/2021 studies and conservation actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use of artcles in any medium, reproducton, and distributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication A preliminary checklist of butterflies from the northern Eastern Ghats with notes on new and significant species records including three new reports for peninsular India Rajkamal Goswami, Ovee Thorat, Vikram Aditya & Seena Narayanan Karimbumkara 26 November 2018 | Vol. 10 | No. 13 | Pages: 12769–12791 10.11609/jot.3730.10.13.12769-12791 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints contact <[email protected]> Publisher & Host Partners Member Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 November 2018 | 10(13): 12769–12791 A preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Butterflies in Two Selected Habitats of Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District
    6 VII July 2018 http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.7096 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887 Volume 6 Issue VII, July 2018- Available at www.ijraset.com Biodiversity of Butterflies in Two Selected Habitats of Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District Jaya Durkga. S1, Rajan M. K2 1, 2 Post graduate and Research Department of Zoology Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous) Sivakasi - 626 124 Abstract: A survey on the status and distribution of the butterflies was undertaken at two different selected habitats of Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar district during the study period January 2016 to December 2016. In the present investigation 51 species of butterflies belonging to 8 Families, among these 47 species of butterflies recorded from scrub jungle habitat and 21 species of butterflies recorded from open land habitat. The Simpson’s index, Evenness and Relative abundance also observed. In the present study, the member of the Family Nymphalidae was most dominant and Family Acraeidae was less dominant. The maximum numbers of butterfly species observed in scrub jungle habitat due to the majority of food plants are present. Keywords: Butterfly diversity, Simpson’s index, Evenness index, Nymphalidae, Acraeidae. I. INTRODUCTION The term “Biological diversity” or its short-term “Biodiversity” is a synonym for the variety and variability within species, between species of an ecosystem [5]. India encompasses about 2.7% of total area of the land and one of the richest countries in the world in terms of biodiversity. Butterflies are the most beautiful and colorful creatures on the earth and have a great aesthetic value.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Sri Lanka
    Gehan's Photo Booklet Butterflies of Sri Lanka and Southern India YS% ,xldfõ iy ol=Kq bkaÈhdfõ iuk<hska ,yq;ifapYk; njd; ,e;jpahtpYk; cs;s tz;zj;Jg;G+r;rpfs; Gehan de Silva Wijeyeratne f.ydka o is,ajd úf–r;ak nf`hd; j rpy;th tpN[auj;d A Conservation Project fcÜúka n[l;tpq; Jetwing ECO HOLIDAYS Status The key used for the status in Sri Lanka is as follows. C = Common R = Resident U = Uncommon M= Migrant S = Scarce E = Endemic H = Highly as in Highly Scarce V = Vagrant (Very Scarce is not used as V is already used to denote vagrant) As can be seen from the table above, an indication of abundance on the left column combines with an indication of status on the right hand column, to indicate the overall status of a species. Thus HSR means Highly Scarce Resident, CR means Common Resident and so on. ;;ajh fuu iqÑfhka rg;=, ;;ajh fmkakqï lrh's C = iq,N R = ksjeis U = iq,N ke;s M= ksyeß$ixpdrl S = ÿ¾,N E = wdfõksl$;ekaje;s H = b;d V= wdhdf,a hk by; oelafjk j.=fjys jï ;Srefõ úfYaIfha iq,N;djh;a ol=Kq ;Srefõ rg;=, ;;ajh;a fmkakqï lrhs' WodyrKhla jYfhka HSR hkq b;d ÿ¾,N ksjeisfhls" CR hkq i q,N ksjeishla jYfhks' juhjuk; ,t;tl;ltiz ehl;bYs;s epiyikia fhl;Lk; C = nghJthdit R = cs;@u; U = mUikahdit M= Gyk;ngau;git S = mw;Gjkhdit E = Fwpg;ghdit H = mjpmw;Gjkhdit V = miye;Jjpuptd NkNy cs;s ml;ltizapypUe;J mwpe;Jnfhs;sf;$baJ vd;dntdpy;> tyJgf;f $l;bDs; Vwpj;Jf;fhl;lg;gl;L;sitAld; ,lJgf;f $l;by; Fwpj;Jf;fhllg;gl;litia ,izj;J xl;Lnkhj;j ,dq;fspdJk; juhjuj;ijf; Fwpj;Jf; fl;LjyhFk;.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Biodiverse Green Roofs for Japan: Arthropod and Colonizer Plant Diversity on Harappa and Biotope Roofs
    20182018 Green RoofsUrban and Naturalist Urban Biodiversity SpecialSpecial Issue No. Issue 1:16–38 No. 1 A. Nagase, Y. Yamada, T. Aoki, and M. Nomura URBAN NATURALIST Developing Biodiverse Green Roofs for Japan: Arthropod and Colonizer Plant Diversity on Harappa and Biotope Roofs Ayako Nagase1,*, Yoriyuki Yamada2, Tadataka Aoki2, and Masashi Nomura3 Abstract - Urban biodiversity is an important ecological goal that drives green-roof in- stallation. We studied 2 kinds of green roofs designed to optimize biodiversity benefits: the Harappa (extensive) roof and the Biotope (intensive) roof. The Harappa roof mimics vacant-lot vegetation. It is relatively inexpensive, is made from recycled materials, and features community participation in the processes of design, construction, and mainte- nance. The Biotope roof includes mainly native and host plant species for arthropods, as well as water features and stones to create a wide range of habitats. This study is the first to showcase the Harappa roof and to compare biodiversity on Harappa and Biotope roofs. Arthropod species richness was significantly greater on the Biotope roof. The Harappa roof had dynamic seasonal changes in vegetation and mainly provided habitats for grassland fauna. In contrast, the Biotope roof provided stable habitats for various arthropods. Herein, we outline a set of testable hypotheses for future comparison of these different types of green roofs aimed at supporting urban biodiversity. Introduction Rapid urban growth and associated anthropogenic environmental change have been identified as major threats to biodiversity at a global scale (Grimm et al. 2008, Güneralp and Seto 2013). Green roofs can partially compensate for the loss of green areas by replacing impervious rooftop surfaces and thus, contribute to urban biodiversity (Brenneisen 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Hesperüdae of Vietnam, 151 New Records of Hesperiidae from Southern Vietnam (Lepidoptera, Hesperüdae) by A
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2003 Band/Volume: 34 Autor(en)/Author(s): Devyatkin Alexey L., Monastyrskii Alexander L. Artikel/Article: Hesperiidae of Vietnam, 15 New records of Hesperiidae from southern Vietnam (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae) 119-133 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2003) 34(1/2): 119-133, colour plate Xc, Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Hesperüdae of Vietnam, 151 New records of Hesperiidae from southern Vietnam (Lepidoptera, Hesperüdae) by A. L.D evyatkin & A. L Monastyrskii received 5.V.2003 Summary: A total of 67 species is added to the list of Hesperiidae of southern Vietnam, 15 of them being new for the country as a whole. A new subspecies, Pyroneura callineura natalia subspec. nov. is described and illustrated. Taxonomic notes on certain species are presented. Since the previous publication summarizing the knowledge of the Hesperiidae in the southern part of Vietnam (Devyatkin & M onastyrskii , 2000), several further localities have been visited by research expeditions and individual collectors. The annotated list below is based predominantly on the material collected in the Cat Tien Na­ ture Reserve in 2000 (no year is given for the label data in the list), which was most profoundly studied and proved to be very rich and diverse in terms of the butterfly fauna, and contains new records for the south of the country along with some taxonomic corrections made in view of the new data. Although some of the areas concerned in this paper may be geographically attributed to the southern part of Central Vietnam (or Annam), they were not regarded in our previous publica­ tions dedicated to the northern and central areas of the country (Devyatkin & M onastyrskii , 1999, 2002), the new data thus being supplementary to those published before on the south­ ern part of Vietnam (Devyatkin & M onastyrskii , 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Articles
    QL 541 .1866 ENT The Journal of Research Lepidoptera Volume 46 2013 ISSN 0022 4324 (PRINT) 2156 5457 (ONLINE) THE LEPIDOPTERA RESEARCH FOUNDATION The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org ISSN 0022 4324 (print) 2156 5457 (online) Published by: The Lepidoptera Research Foundation, Inc. 9620 Heather Road Beverly Hills, California 90210-1757 TEL (310) 274 1052 E-mail: Editorial: [email protected] Technical: [email protected] Founder: William Hovanitz (1915-1977) Editorial Staff: Konrad Fiedler, University of Vienna, Editor [email protected] Nancy R. Vannucci, info manager [email protected] Associate Editors: Annette Aiello, Smithsonian Institution [email protected] Joaquin Baixeras, Universitat de Valencia [email protected] Marcelo Duarte, Universidade de Sao Paulo [email protected] Klaus Fischer, University of Greifswald [email protected] Krushnamegh Kunte, Natl. Center for Biol. Sci, India [email protected] Gerardo Lamas, Universidad Mayor de San Marcos [email protected]. pe Rudi Mattoni [email protected] Soren Nylin, Stockholm University [email protected] Naomi Pierce, Harvard University [email protected] Robert Robbins, Smithsonian Institution [email protected] Daniel Rubinoff, University of Hawaii [email protected] Josef Settele, Helmholtz Cntr. for Environ. Research-UFZ [email protected] Arthur M. Shapiro, University of California - Davis [email protected] Felix Sperling, University of Alberta [email protected] Niklas Wahlberg, University of Turku [email protected] Shen Horn Yen, National Sun Yat-Sen University [email protected] Manuscripts and notices material must be sent to the editor, Konrad Fiedler [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Wildlife Tour Report 2014 Birdwatching Butterfly Mammal
    Sri Lanka The Enchanted Isle A Greentours Trip Report 17th February to 7th March 2014 Led by Paul Cardy Trip Report and Systematic Lists written by Paul Cardy Day 0/1 Monday February 17th & Tuesday February 18th Journey to Sri Lanka and to Kandy A rather unusual beginning to the tour this year, as I had been in the north checking out some new areas, and the two different flight arrivals were met by our excellent ground agents. I arrived at the Suisse in Kandy late morning to meet Geoff, Margaret, and Mary and before too long Rees and Carol arrived. Free time followed with lunch available if and when wanted. On the lake in front of the hotel were Indian Cormorants, Little Cormorants, Little and Great Egrets, and Black-crowned Night Herons. Basking on the same log was Indian Softshell Terrapin. Three-spot Grass Yellow, Psyche, and Zebra Blue flew in the hotel gardens, which supported a very large Flying Fox roost. We met up at 3.30 for an afternoon excursion. In three-wheelers we motored around the lake to a small guesthouse, the terrace of which overlooks the good forest of the Udawattakelle Sanctuary. White-bellied Sea Eagle was much in evidence throughout our stay, with two birds in the air over the forest. Yellow-fronted Barbet, Orange Minivets, Oriental White-eyes, Bar-winged Flycatcher Shrike, and Hill Mynas were all seen well. Sri Lanka Hanging Parrots regularly flew over, calling, which would be how we would most often see them during the tour, and Ceylon Swallows were in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 7 (End of Volume) THE BUTTERFLIES OF VIRGINIA (With 31 Plates) BY AUSTIN H. CLARK AND LEILA F. CLARK Smithsonian Institution DEC 89 «f (PUBUCATION 4050) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 20, 1951 0EC2 01951 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 116, NO. 7, FRONTISPIECE Butterflies of Virginia (From photograph by Frederick M. Bayer. For explanation, see page 195.) SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 7 (End of Volume) THE BUTTERFLIES OF VIRGINIA (With 31 Plates) BY AUSTIN H. CLARK AND LEILA F. CLARK Smithsonian Institution z Mi -.££& /ORG (Publication 4050) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 20, 1951 Zfyt. Borb QBattimovt (preee BALTIMORE, 1ID., D. 6. A. PREFACE Since 1933 we have devoted practically all our leisure time to an intensive study of the butterflies of Virginia. We have regularly spent our annual leave in the State, stopping at various places from which each day we drove out into the surrounding country. In addition to prolonged visits of 2 weeks or more to various towns and cities, we spent many week ends in particularly interesting localities. We have visited all the 100 counties in the State at least twice, most of them many times, and our personal records are from more than 800 locali- ties. We have paid special attention to the Coastal Plain, particularly the great swamps in Nansemond, Norfolk, and Princess Anne Counties, and to the western mountains. Virginia is so large and so diversified that it would have been im- possible for us, without assistance, to have made more than a super- ficial and unsatisfactory study of the local butterflies.
    [Show full text]