DOCSLIB.ORG

Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 7 (End of Volume) THE BUTTERFLIES OF VIRGINIA (With 31 Plates) BY AUSTIN H. CLARK AND LEILA F. CLARK Smithsonian Institution DEC 89 «f (PUBUCATION 4050) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 20, 1951 0EC2 01951 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 116, NO. 7, FRONTISPIECE Butterflies of Virginia (From photograph by Frederick M. Bayer. For explanation, see page 195.) SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 116, NUMBER 7 (End of Volume) THE BUTTERFLIES OF VIRGINIA (With 31 Plates) BY AUSTIN H. CLARK AND LEILA F. CLARK Smithsonian Institution z Mi -.££& /ORG (Publication 4050) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 20, 1951 Zfyt. Borb QBattimovt (preee BALTIMORE, 1ID., D. 6. A. PREFACE Since 1933 we have devoted practically all our leisure time to an intensive study of the butterflies of Virginia. We have regularly spent our annual leave in the State, stopping at various places from which each day we drove out into the surrounding country. In addition to prolonged visits of 2 weeks or more to various towns and cities, we spent many week ends in particularly interesting localities. We have visited all the 100 counties in the State at least twice, most of them many times, and our personal records are from more than 800 locali- ties. We have paid special attention to the Coastal Plain, particularly the great swamps in Nansemond, Norfolk, and Princess Anne Counties, and to the western mountains. Virginia is so large and so diversified that it would have been im- possible for us, without assistance, to have made more than a super- ficial and unsatisfactory study of the local butterflies. We have been so fortunate as to have had invaluable assistance from many friends within the State, some of whom have sent us hundreds of records and many specimens from their home territory. Prof. Carroll M. Williams, of Harvard, provided us with records from Richmond and localities farther east, extending over several years. Dr. Carroll E. Wood, Jr., and Dr. Carl W. Gottschalk collected records and specimens for us at Salem and in Roanoke County for more than 7 years. Frank W. Trainer sent us detailed records and many specimens, covering a period of several years, from Farmville, and later from Charlottesville. Warren P. Stoutamire sent us his records from Gala, and Lloyd G. Carr sent us records and specimens from Mountain Lake. But this is by no means all the assistance we have had. Prof. Ellison A. Smyth, Jr., was so very kind as to send us his records for more than 50 years' collecting, chiefly from Blacksburg and Poverty Hol- low, Montgomery County, and also from Salem. These were supple- mented by records from Poverty Hollow sent us by Herman J. Erb. Dr. Frank Morton Jones most generously sent us his records from eastern Virginia, especially Accomack, Northampton, Princess Anne, and Nansemond Counties. Jackson H., John, and Alexander Boyd have sent us many interesting records from Woodberry Forest and the Dismal Swamp region. John M. Burns has given us numerous records from Mountain Lake. iv SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. Il6 Otto Buchholz has been so good as to send us detailed records of all the species he collected over a period of several years in eastern Virginia, several of which were not found by anyone else. Dr. War- ren Herbert Wagner, Jr., made many trips to different parts of Vir- ginia to get records for us, and we owe most of the information re- garding the distribution of Poanes aaroni to him. He and Dr. George W. Rawson paid special attention to the Second Swamp near New Bohemia and also to the North Landing River swamp, providing us with many records from those interesting areas. On our visits to various localities in Virginia we have from time to time been accompanied by friends who have assisted us in gathering specimens and records. Mr. and Mrs. Ernest L. Bell have been with us in eastern Virginia, and also in Frederick County. Prof, and Mrs. Charles T. BrueS and Dr. Alice Brues joined the Bells and ourselves on a visit to the Dismal Swamp region. Dr. and Mrs. William M. Mann accompanied us on a 2 weeks' trip to southern and southwestern Virginia, and also on other trips to the Dismal Swamp and the North- ern Neck. Jackson H., John, and Alexander Boyd joined us in a visit to the Dismal Swamp, and Dr. and Mrs. Harald A. Rehder have also been with us in the same area. Mr. and Mrs. William D. Field and later Mr. and Mrs. R. Tucker Abbott accompanied us on expedi- tions to Middle Mountain in western Highland County. Others who have been with us on collecting trips are Dr. and Mrs. Adam G. Boving, Dr. and Mrs. Grover C. Pitts, Dr. Carl W. Gott- schalk, Dr. Laurence Ilsley Hewes, Dr. William T. M. Forbes, Dr. Walter S. Hough, Mr. and Mrs. John F. Gates Clarke, Mr. and Mrs. David Hall, Lt. Col. and Mrs. Edvald L. Rasmussen, Dr. and Mrs. George S. Myers, Dr. and Mrs. Matthew W. Stirling, Dr. Herbert Friedmann, Mr. and Mrs. John E. Graf, Prof. John W. Bailey, John B. Lewis, Mr. and Mrs. Gerrit S. Miller, Dr. and Mrs. William F. Foshag, Mr. and Mrs. Stephen J. McDonough, Dr. Richard P. Dow, Miss Grace Sandhouse, Dr. Ashley B. Gurney, Dr. Norman B. Tin- dale of Adelaide, South Australia, Mr. and Mrs. Herbert G. Deignan, Dr. Ellis LeG. Traughton of Sydney, New South Wales, Dr. Austin Roberts and Dr. E. Percy Phillips of South Africa, Dr. H. Boschma and Dr. L. P. Holthuis of Leiden, The Netherlands, Prof, and Mrs. Torsten Gislen of Lund, Sweden, Mrs. G. S. Pobst of Tazewell, and Vilhelm Lauritzen and V. Lauritsen of Copenhagen, Denmark. During the course of our work in Virginia we have been the re- cipients of generous hospitality in many places. Among our hosts and hostesses we are especially indebted to Miss Lilian E. Smith of Mount ; NO. 7 PREFACE V Solon ; Miss Willie T. Weathers of Aylett ; Miss Florence Walker of Bayford ; Dr. and Mrs. William T. Sanger, Dr. and Mrs. Wortley F. Rudd, and Dr. and Mrs. Sidney S. Negus of Richmond ; Lt. Col. and Mrs. Edvald L. Rasmussen and Mr. and Mrs. Richard H. Rule of Fairfax ; Mr. and Mrs. John A. Blakemore of Abingdon ; Dr. and Mrs. George W. Jeffers of Farmville ; Mr. and Mrs. Gus Welsh of Apple Orchard Mountain ; Theodor Mussaeus of Limeton ; John B. Lewis of Amelia Court House ; and L. Parker Hill of Suffolk. While this memoir was in press we received many additional records from Petersburg sent us by Bryant Mather of Jackson, Miss. ; from the Dismal Swamp region sent us by Kilian Roever of Jackson, Tenn. and from Boyd's Tavern, which we owe to the kindness of Miss Leila A. Henry of Arlington, Va. Also, we enjoyed the hospitality of Mr. and Mrs. Douglas D. Withers of Mount Solon, and accom- panied Mr. and Mrs. William J. Faymonville, Jr., of Louisville, Ky., on a visit to Reddish Knob. William D. Field, associate curator of insects, United States Na- tional Museum, has been so good as to read over the entire manu- script for us, and we are greatly obliged to him for his critical com- ments. Cyril F. dos Passos most kindly checked all the scientific names, bringing them into conformity with current usage. We realize that this report represents only an introduction to the study of the butterflies of Virginia. A vast amount of work still re- mains to be done before they can be considered as adequately known. Many areas in the western mountains and on the Coastal Plain have not been explored, and far more information is necessary for the ac- curate determination of the seasons in different parts of the State. We hope later to publish our detailed records, and also our notes on the habits and other attributes of the various species. For the illustrations we are indebted to the late Gurney I. High- tower and to Floyd B. Kestner, Smithsonian Institution photog- raphers. All the specimens shown are in the United States National Museum. CONTENTS Page Preface iii Introduction i Distribution of butterflies in Virginia 2 The map 8 Keys to the butterflies of Virginia 9 1. Key to the families and subfamilies of butterflies represented in Vir- ginia 10 2. Key to the species of Lethiinae 11 3. Key to the species of Satyrinae 11 4. Key to the species of Apaturidae, Nymphalidae, Argynnidae, and Danaidae 12 5. Key to the species of Riodinidae 15 6. Key to the species of Lycaenidae 15 7. Key to the species of Pieridae 18 8. Key to the species of Papilionidae 20 9. Key to the species of Pyrginae 21 10. Key to the males of the species of Hesperiinae 24 Annotated list of butterflies of Virginia 30 Family Satyridae 30 Family Apaturidae 39 Family Nymphalidae 40 Family Argynnidae 49 Family Danaidae 65 Family Libytheidae 68 Family Riodinidae 6g Family Lycaenidae 70 Family Pieridae 86 Family Papilionidae 118 Family Hesperiidae 147 Erroneous records 186 Bibliography 187 Plates 197 Index 229 THE BUTTERFLIES OF VIRGINIA By AUSTIN H. CLARK AND LEILA F. CLARK Smithsonian Institution (With 31 Plates) INTRODUCTION The number of species and subspecies of butterflies for which we have definite records for Virginia is 154. Two of these, Pieris vir- giniensis and Phocbis philea, are accidental visitors. Several others, as Agraulis vanillae, Strymon Ontario, Ascia phileta, and Urbanus proteus, are irregularly recurrent visitors. Several butterflies of regu- lar occurrence in the State are summer visitors only, dying out com- pletely during winter.
Recommended publications
  • Papilio Glaucus, P. Marcellus, P. Philenor, Pieris Rapae, Colias Philo Dice, Antho­ Caris Genutia, Anaea Andria, Euptychia Gemma

    Papilio Glaucus, P. Marcellus, P. Philenor, Pieris Rapae, Colias Philo Dice, Antho­ Caris Genutia, Anaea Andria, Euptychia Gemma

    102 REMINGTON: 1952 Central Season Vol.7, nos.3·4 Papilio glaucus, P. marcellus, P. philenor, Pieris rapae, Colias philo dice, Antho­ caris genutia, Anaea andria, Euptychia gemma. One exception to the general scarcity was the large number of Erynnis brizo and E. juvenalis which were seen clustered around damp spots in a dry branch on April 9. MERRITT counted 67 Erynnis and 2 Papilio glaucus around one such spOt and 45 Erynnis around another. Only one specimen of Incisalia henrici was seen this spring. MERRITT was pleased to find Incisalia niphon still present in a small tract of pine although the area was swept by a ground fire in 1951. Vanessa cardui appeared sparingly from June 12 on, the first since 1947. In the late summer the season appeared normal. Eurema lisa, Nathalis iole, Lycaena thoe, and Hylephila phyleus were common. Junonia coenia was more abundant around Louisville than he has ever seen it. A rarity taken in Louisville this fall was Atlides halesus, the first seen since 1948. The latest seasonal record made by Merritt was a specimen of Colias eury­ theme flying south very fast on December 7. EDWARD WELLING sent a record of finding Lagoa crispata on June 27 at Covington. Contributors: F. R. ARNHOLD; E. G. BAILEY; RALPH BEEBE; S. M. COX; H. V. DALY; 1. W . GRIEWISCH; J. B. HAYES; R. W. HODGES; VONTA P. HYNES; R. LEUSCHNER; J. R. MERRITT; J. H. NEWMAN; M. C. NIEL­ SEN; 1. S. PHILLIPS; P. S. REMINGTON; WM. SIEKER; EDWARD VOSS; W. H . WAGNER, JR.; E. C.
  • Uncus Shaped Akin to Elephant Tusks Defines a New Genus for Two Very Different-In-Appearance Neotropical Skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae)

    Uncus Shaped Akin to Elephant Tusks Defines a New Genus for Two Very Different-In-Appearance Neotropical Skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae)

    The Journal Volume 45: 101-112 of Research on the Lepidoptera ISSN 0022-4324 (PR in T ) THE LEPIDOPTERA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, 29 DE C EMBER 2012 ISSN 2156-5457 (O N L in E ) Uncus shaped akin to elephant tusks defines a new genus for two very different-in-appearance Neotropical skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) Nic K V. GR ishin Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, USA 75390-9050 [email protected] Abstract. Analyses of male genitalia, other aspects of adult, larval and pupal morphology, and DNA COI barcode sequences suggest that Potamanaxas unifasciata (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867) does not belong to Potamanaxas Lindsey, 1925 and not even to the Erynnini tribe, but instead is more closely related to Milanion Godman & Salvin, 1895 and Atarnes Godman & Salvin, 1897, (Achlyodini). Unexpected and striking similarities are revealed in the male genitalia of P. unifasciata and Atarnes hierax (Hopffer, 1874). Their genitalia are so similar and distinct from the others that one might casually mistake them for the same species. Capturing this uniqueness, a new genus Eburuncus is erected to include: E. unifasciata, new combination (type species) and E. hierax, new combination. Key words: phylogenetic classification, monophyletic taxa, immature stages, DNA barcodes,Atarnes sallei, Central America, Peru. INTRODUCT I ON 1982-1999). Most of Burns’ work derives from careful analysis of genitalia, recently assisted by morphology Comprehensive work by Evans (e.g. Evans, 1937; of immature stages and molecular evidence (e.g. 1952; 1953) still remains the primary source of Burns & Janzen, 2005; Burns et al., 2009; 2010).
  • Butterflies of the Wesleyan Campus

    Butterflies of the Wesleyan Campus

    BUTTERFLIES OF THE WESLEYAN CAMPUS SWALLOWTAILS Hairstreaks (Subfamily - Theclinae) (Family PAPILIONIDAE) Great Purple Hairstreak - Atlides halesus Coral Hairstreak - Satyrium titus True Swallowtails Banded Hairstreak - Satyrium calanus (Subfamily - Papilioninae) Striped Hairstreak - Satyrium liparops Pipevine Swallowtail - Battus philenor Henry’s Elfin - Callophrys henrici Zebra Swallowtail - Eurytides marcellus Eastern Pine Elfin - Callophrys niphon Black Swallowtail - Papilio polyxenes Juniper Hairstreak - Callophrys gryneus Giant Swallowtail - Papilio cresphontes White M Hairstreak - Parrhasius m-album Eastern Tiger Swallowtail - Papilio glaucus Gray Hairstreak - Strymon melinus Spicebush Swallowtail - Papilio troilus Red-banded Hairstreak - Calycopis cecrops Palamedes Swallowtail - Papilio palamedes Blues (Subfamily - Polommatinae) Ceraunus Blue - Hemiargus ceraunus Eastern-Tailed Blue - Everes comyntas WHITES AND SULPHURS Spring Azure - Celastrina ladon (Family PIERIDAE) Whites (Subfamily - Pierinae) BRUSHFOOTS Cabbage White - Pieris rapae (Family NYMPHALIDAE) Falcate Orangetip - Anthocharis midea Snouts (Subfamily - Libytheinae) American Snout - Libytheana carinenta Sulphurs and Yellows (Subfamily - Coliadinae) Clouded Sulphur - Colias philodice Heliconians and Fritillaries Orange Sulphur - Colias eurytheme (Subfamily - Heliconiinae) Southern Dogface - Colias cesonia Gulf Fritillary - Agraulis vanillae Cloudless Sulphur - Phoebis sennae Zebra Heliconian - Heliconius charithonia Barred Yellow - Eurema daira Variegated Fritillary
  • Rare Native Animals of RI

    Rare Native Animals of RI

    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves

    Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves

    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
  • Orange Sulphur, Colias Eurytheme, on Boneset

    Orange Sulphur, Colias Eurytheme, on Boneset

    Orange Sulphur, Colias eurytheme, on Boneset, Eupatorium perfoliatum, In OMC flitrh Insect Survey of Waukegan Dunes, Summer 2002 Including Butterflies, Dragonflies & Beetles Prepared for the Waukegan Harbor Citizens' Advisory Group Jean B . Schreiber (Susie), Chair Principal Investigator : John A. Wagner, Ph . D . Associate, Department of Zoology - Insects Field Museum of Natural History 1400 South Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 Telephone (708) 485 7358 home (312) 665 7016 museum Email jwdw440(q-), m indsprinq .co m > home wagner@,fmnh .orq> museum Abstract: From May 10, 2002 through September 13, 2002, eight field trips were made to the Harbor at Waukegan, Illinois to survey the beach - dunes and swales for Odonata [dragonfly], Lepidoptera [butterfly] and Coleoptera [beetles] faunas between Midwest Generation Plant on the North and the Outboard Marine Corporation ditch at the South . Eight species of Dragonflies, fourteen species of Butterflies, and eighteen species of beetles are identified . No threatened or endangered species were found in this survey during twenty-four hours of field observations . The area is undoubtedly home to many more species than those listed in this report. Of note, the endangered Karner Blue butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samuelis Nabakov was not seen even though it has been reported from Illinois Beach State Park, Lake County . The larval food plant, Lupinus perennis, for the blue was not observed at Waukegan. The limestone seeps habitat of the endangered Hines Emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana, is not part of the ecology here . One surprise is the. breeding population of Buckeye butterflies, Junonia coenid (Hubner) which may be feeding on Purple Loosestrife . The specimens collected in this study are deposited in the insect collection at the Field Museum .
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
  • Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan

    Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 16 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Article 5 October 1983 Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan Mark F. O'Brien The University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation O'Brien, Mark F. 1983. "Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 16 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/5 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. O'Brien: Bibliographic Guide to the Terrestrial Arthropods of Michigan 1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 87 BIBLIOGRAPHIC GUIDE TO THE TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS OF MICHIGAN Mark F. O'Brienl ABSTRACT Papers dealing with distribution, faunal extensions, and identification of Michigan insects and other terrestrial arthropods are listed by order, and cover the period of 1878 through 1982. The following bibliography lists the publications dealing with the distribution or identification of insects and other terrestrial arthropods occurring in the State of Michigan. Papers dealing only with biological, behavioral, or economic aspects are not included. The entries are grouped by orders, which are arranged alphabetically, rather than phylogenetic ally , to facilitate information retrieval. The intent of this paper is to provide a ready reference to works on the Michigan fauna, although some of the papers cited will be useful for other states in the Great Lakes region.
  • Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis Persius Persius

    Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis Persius Persius

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada ENDANGERED 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 41 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge M.L. Holder for writing the status report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada. COSEWIC also gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Environment Canada. The COSEWIC report review was overseen and edited by Theresa B. Fowler, Co-chair, COSEWIC Arthropods Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’Hespérie Persius de l’Est (Erynnis persius persius) au Canada. Cover illustration: Eastern Persius Duskywing — Original drawing by Andrea Kingsley ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 Catalogue No. CW69-14/475-2006E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43258-4 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2006 Common name Eastern Persius Duskywing Scientific name Erynnis persius persius Status Endangered Reason for designation This lupine-feeding butterfly has been confirmed from only two sites in Canada.
  • INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) DE GUATEMALA CON UNA RESEÑA HISTÓRICA Towards a Synthesis of the Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Guatemala with a Historical Sketch

    INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) DE GUATEMALA CON UNA RESEÑA HISTÓRICA Towards a Synthesis of the Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Guatemala with a Historical Sketch

    ZOOLOGÍA-TAXONOMÍA www.unal.edu.co/icn/publicaciones/caldasia.htm Caldasia 31(2):407-440. 2009 HACIA UNA SÍNTESIS DE LOS PAPILIONOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) DE GUATEMALA CON UNA RESEÑA HISTÓRICA Towards a synthesis of the Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Guatemala with a historical sketch JOSÉ LUIS SALINAS-GUTIÉRREZ El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km. 5.5, A. P. 424, C. P. 77900. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México, México. [email protected] CLAUDIO MÉNDEZ Escuela de Biología, Universidad de San Carlos, Ciudad Universitaria, Campus Central USAC, Zona 12. Guatemala, Guatemala. [email protected] MERCEDES BARRIOS Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (CECON), Universidad de San Carlos, Avenida La Reforma 0-53, Zona 10, Guatemala, Guatemala. [email protected] CARMEN POZO El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km. 5.5, A. P. 424, C. P. 77900. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México, México. [email protected] JORGE LLORENTE-BOUSQUETS Museo de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. Apartado Postal 70-399, México D.F. 04510; México. [email protected]. Autor responsable. RESUMEN La riqueza biológica de Mesoamérica es enorme. Dentro de esta gran área geográfi ca se encuentran algunos de los ecosistemas más diversos del planeta (selvas tropicales), así como varios de los principales centros de endemismo en el mundo (bosques nublados). Países como Guatemala, en esta gran área biogeográfi ca, tiene grandes zonas de bosque húmedo tropical y bosque mesófi lo, por esta razón es muy importante para analizar la diversidad en la región. Lamentablemente, la fauna de mariposas de Guatemala es poco conocida y por lo tanto, es necesario llevar a cabo un estudio y análisis de la composición y la diversidad de las mariposas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) en Guatemala.
  • SKEETA – Float Like a Butterfly Sting Like a Bee

    SKEETA – Float Like a Butterfly Sting Like a Bee

    SKEETA – Float like a Butterfly sting like a Bee Dynamic development of a new market Foiling dinghies have become well established in the last 15 years, since the advent of flying Moth. The foiling catamarans in the America's Cup provided additional impetus from 2013 onwards. Foiling - this unique sailing experience was previously reserved for only a few, mostly pro-sailors. Sailing skills, technical and financial requirements were high - usually too high. This situation is currently changing. Significantly and faster than generally assumed. Scow-Shape rediscovered Today the Scow shape is experiencing an unexpected comeback, not only in small boats. The hull of the SKEETA is based on the proven Australian Moth class Scow shapes. It has been optimised step by step to meet the requirements for foiling. No snapshot The SKEETA is the latest foiling dinghy of the 3rd generation, designed, built, tested and made ready for production by an Australian duo that has been designing Moths with or without foils for many years. An exchange of ideas and opinions with QUANTBOATS took place during the last years. Quite a few wishes and requirements on the part of QUANTBOATS could be taken into account. SKEETA fits perfectly with our philosophy today. Fun throughout the entire wind range Like all our boats, the SKEETA is characterized by good-natured behaviour and excellent all-round characteristics. There is no need to forego performance - on the contrary. This includes perfect foiling behaviour in the lower to medium wind range as well as comfortable, controlled and fast sailing in very light or very strong winds.
  • Daily Eastern News: March 25, 2003 Eastern Illinois University

    Daily Eastern News: March 25, 2003 Eastern Illinois University

    Eastern Illinois University The Keep March 2003 3-25-2003 Daily Eastern News: March 25, 2003 Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_2003_mar Recommended Citation Eastern Illinois University, "Daily Eastern News: March 25, 2003" (2003). March. 11. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_2003_mar/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the 2003 at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in March by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Thll the troth March 25, 2003 + T UE S D A V and don't be afraid. • VO LUME 87 . NUMBER 120 THE DA ILYEASTERN NEWS . COM Winning one for THE DAILY the Gipper Panthers try to give head coach Jim Schmitz his 400th win at Saint Louis. EASTERN NEWS Page 12 Current conflict not technically a 'war ' for U.S. By Avian Carrasquilo STUDENT GOVERNMENT ED ITOR Stornns,resistCUlce For almost a week now news broadcasts have been dominated slow movement into by coverage with the banners and slick graphics proclaiming Iraqi capital city "War in Iraq. • But debate exists whether the By The Associated Press United States is currently in a war because President George W. U.S.-led warplanes and heli­ Bush has never gotten Congress' copters attacked Republican approval for such action. Guard units defending Scott Stanzel, of the White Baghdad on Monday while House Press Secretary's office, ground troops advanced to said Congress has supported the within 50 miles of the Iraqi use of force in Iraq and that capital.