DOCSLIB.ORG

Proyek Akhir Sarjana Perancangan Pusat Kunjungan Kerajinan Perak Di Purbayan Kotagede Dengan Pendekatan Infill Design Dan Penerapan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proyek Akhir Sarjana Perancangan Pusat Kunjungan Kerajinan Perak Di Purbayan Kotagede Dengan Pendekatan Infill Design Dan Penerapan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang PROYEK AKHIR SARJANA PERANCANGAN PUSAT KUNJUNGAN KERAJINAN PERAK DI PURBAYAN KOTAGEDE DENGAN PENDEKATAN INFILL DESIGN DAN PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR RUMAH KALANG Disusun Oleh : Nawang Syahda Prabapuspita (16512027) Dosen Pembimbing : Supriyanta, Ir, Msi PROGRAM STUDI ARSITEKTUR FAKULTAS TEKNIK SIPIL DAN PERENCANAAN UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA 2020 BACHELOR FINAL PROJECT DESIGN OF SILVER CRAFT VISITOR CENTER IN PURBAYAN KOTAGEDE WITH INFILL DESIGN APPROACH AND KALANG HOUSE ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION Arranged By : Nawang Syahda Prabapuspita (16512027) Supervisor : Supriyanta, Ir, Msi ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND PLANNING UNIVERSITY OF ISLAM INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA 2020 i CATATAN DOSEN PEMBIMBING Berikut adalah penilaian buku laporan Akhir Proyek Sarjana : Nama Mahasiswa : Nawang Syahda Prabapuspita Nomor Mahasiswa : 16512027 Judul Proyek Akhir Sarjana : Perancangan Silver Craft Visitor Center dengan Pendekatan Infill Design dan Penerapan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang di Purbayan Kotagede Design of Silver Craft Visitor Center with Infill Design Approach and Application of Kalang House Architecture in Purbayan Kotagede Kualitas Buku Laporan Akhir PAS : Kurang, Sedang, Baik, Baik Sekali* Sehingga Direkomendasikan / Tidak Direkomendasikan* untuk menjadi acuan produk Proyek Akhir Sarjana *) Mohon dilingkari ii HALAMAN PERNYATAAN Proyek Akhir Sarjana Periode Semester Ganjil 2018-2019 PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN KARYA Saya menyatakan bahwa seluruh bagian karya Proyek Akhir Sarjana ini merupakan karya yang saya tulis sendiri kecuali karya yang dikutip serta disebut referensinya dan tidak ada bantuan dari pihak lain baik seluruhnya ataupun sebagian dalam proses pembuatannya. Selain itu saya menyatakan tidak ada konflik hak kepemilikan intelektual atas karya ini dan dengan ini saya menyerahkan kepada Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Islam Indonesia untuk digunakan bagi kepentingan pendidikan dan publikasi. Yogyakarta, 10 Juli 2020 Nawang Syahda Prabapuspita iii KATA PENGANTAR Puji syukur penulis panjatkan kepada Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala, karena atas berkat dan ramah-Nya, penulis dapat menyelesaikan Proyek Akhir Sarjana yang berjudul Perancangan Silver Craft Visitor Center dengan Pendekatan Infill Design dan Penerapan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang di Purbayan Kotagede Penulis laporan Proyek Akhir Sarjana ini dilakukan guna memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk mencapai gelar Sarjana Arsitektur pada Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Universitas Islam Indonesia. Penulis menyadari bahwa dalam penulisan laporan ini masih terdapat banyak kekurangan. Oleh karena itu, kritik dan saran yang membangun dari pembaca yang dapat menyempurnakan laporan Proyek Akhir Sarjana ini akan diterima dengan senang hati. Dalam menyelesaikan laporan Proyek Akhir Sarjana ini, penulis mendapatkan banyak bantuan dan bimbingan dari berbagai pihak sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan laporan ini secara tepat waktu. Maka dari itu penulis mengucapkan terima kasih kepada: 1. Allah SWT, yang telah memberikan nikmat iman dan Islam kepada penulis dan NabiMuhammad SAW juga atas segenap keluarga, sahabat dan pengikutnya. 2. Bapak Dr. Yulianto Purwono Prihatmaji S.T.,M.T., IAI.selaku ketua Program Studi Sarjana Arsitektur untuk dorongan semangat, dan motivasi nya selama penulis menempuh perkuliahan. 3. Bapak Supriyanta, Ir., Msi., selaku dosen pembimbing yang dengan sabar memberikan masukan,arahan, dan ilmu baru dalam proses penyelesain Proyek Akhir Sarjana iniserta memberikan semangat untuk terus berkarya dalam kehidupan ber-Arsitektur. 4. Ibu Dr.Ing. Putu Ayu P. Agustiananda, ST.MA. selaku dosen penguji yang telah memberikan wawasan, saran dan kritik yang sangat membangun dalam proses penyelesaian Proyek Akhir Sarjanaini hingga selesai. iv 5. Segenap dosen jurusan arsitektur yang telah banyak membuka wawasan saya tentang dunia arsitektur serta membagi ilmu pengetahuannya selama ini, dan staf –staf jurusan arsitektur yang telah banyak membantu selama saya kuliah. 6. Keluargaku tercinta, bapak Ir, Rudi Prayogo, ibu Sudarwati, kakak Annisa Ayu Prabawati dan Rangga Kharisma Muhammad, serta Adik Ajeng Az-zahra Salsabila serta keluarga besar yang senantiasa memberikan dukungan, doa dan semangat, sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan kuliah dari awal hingga laporan Proyek Akhir Sarjana ini tersusun dengan lancar. 7. Sahabat-sahabatku, Ayesha Amiranti P.M, Zahra Hanan A.S, Ratri Sekar W, dan Nadia Salsabila yang selalu ada saat penulis ingin berkeluh kesah, memberikan semangat, dukungan, doa serta masukan, sehingga penulis bisa menyelesaikan semua ini dengan lancar. 8. Seluruh teman seperjuangan Arsitektur 2016 UII terimakasih sudah memberikan memori yang indah dan kerja samanya selama masa perkuliahan ini 9. Semua pihak yang tidak dapat disebutkan satu persatu, terimakasih atas doa, dukungan, waktu, bantuan baik materil maupun non materil yang karenanya penulis mendapatkan kemudahan sehingga proyek akhir sarjana ini dapat terselesaikan. Semoga Allah memberikan limpahan rahmat, karunia dan balasan yang lebih baik atas kebaikan semua pihak yang secara langsung maupun tidak langsung membantu terselesaikannya proyek akhir sarjana ini, Amin Yogyakarta, 10 Juli 2020 Nawang Syahda Prabapuspita v DAFTAR ISI HALAMAN PENGESAHAN ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CATATAN DOSEN PEMBIMBING ......................................................................... i HALAMAN PERNYATAAN.................................................................................... iii KATA PENGANTAR ................................................................................................ iv KATA PENGANTAR ............................................................................................. Viv DAFTAR ISI ............................................................................................................... iv ABSTRAK .................................................................................................................. xi ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... xii BAB I PENDAHULUAN ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Judul Proyek ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Deskripsi Judul ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Premis Perancangan .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Latar Belakang .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Latar Belakang Proyek ...................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Latar Belakang Permasalahan ......................................................................... 10 1.5 Permasalahan .......................................................................................................... 11 1.5.1 Permasalahn Umum ........................................................................................ 11 1.5.2 Permasalahan Khusus ..................................................................................... 11 1.6 Tujuan Dan Sasaran ................................................................................................ 12 1.6.1 Tujuan ............................................................................................................. 12 1.6.2 Sasaran ............................................................................................................ 12 1.7 Lingkup Permasalahan ............................................................................................ 13 1.8 Peta Persoalan ......................................................................................................... 14 1.9 Metode Penelitian ................................................................................................... 15 1.9.1 Metode Pengumpulan Data ............................................................................. 15 1.9.2 Metode Perancangan ....................................................................................... 15 1.9.3 Metode Uji Desain .......................................................................................... 16 1.10 Kerangka Berpikir ................................................................................................... 17 1.11 Pemecahan Permasalahan ....................................................................................... 18 vi 1.12 Originalitas Penulisan ............................................................................................. 20 BAB II PENELUSURAN PERSOALAN PERANCANGAN DAN PEMECAHAN ...... 21 4.1 Lokasi Perancangan ................................................................................................ 21 4.1.1 Kawasan Kotagede.......................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Kawasan Purbayan .......................................................................................... 22 4.1.3 Kondisi Geografis ........................................................................................... 23 4.1.4 Tata Guna Lahan ............................................................................................. 23 4.1.5 Kondisi Klimatologi Tapak ............................................................................. 24 4.2 Kajian Perancangan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future Needs the Past
    The Future needs the Past: Problems and Challenges of Post-Cataclysm Heritage Management in Kotagede, Jogjakarta Special Province, Indonesia The Future needs the Past: Problems and Challenges of Post-Cataclysm Heritage Management in Kotagede, Jogjakarta Special Province, Indonesia Dr.-Ing. Ir. Widjaja Martokusumo Associate Professor, Architectural Design Research Group School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development ITB Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT n addition to traditional causes of decay, cultural heritage is increasingly threatened by natural I disasters. Earthquakes interrupt the historical continuity of place making and create an opportunity to both reconstruct historical fabrics and to create new meanings and functions. As demonstrated in Kotagede, Jogjakarta Special Province, Indonesia, sustainable conservation should evolve with new contemporary needs and not be about making static museum places. Two case studies of post-calamity reconstruction illustrate the utilization of existing urban fabric, in which through redefi nition and reprogramming do not reveal solutions, but demonstrate the challenges in response to the urban dynamics after the 2006 earthquake. Keywords: Sustainability, Past and Future, juxtaposition, Kotagede, Jogjakarta Special Province. 1. INTRODUCTION: Mataram and other archaeological features, dated KOTAGEDE AND POST-CATACLYSM back from the late 16th and early 17th centuries, including traces of the unique traditional settlement. 2006 Like other traditional Javanese city, the constellation of those elements relates to a unique spatial The city of Kotagede is situated on the East bank of arrangement based upon the concept of Catur Gatra Gajah Wong River, about 5 km to the southeast of the Tunggal. The four-fold confi guration mosque-palace- city center of Jogjakarta, the capital city of Special market-square (alun-alun) recalls the setting of a Province Jogjakarta.(Figure 1a & Figure 1b) The Javanese Palace city as well as the ancient royal big marketplace, Pasar Gede or in short Sargede, capital of Majapahit.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab 2 Penelusuran Persoalan Perancangan Guest House Dengan
    Perancangan Guest House di Kotagede Yogyakarta Dengan Pendekatan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang BAB 2 PENELUSURAN PERSOALAN PERANCANGAN GUEST HOUSE DENGAN PENDEKATAN ARSITEKTUR RUMAH KALANG 2.1 Kajian Awal Tema Perancangan 2.1.1 Kotagede Kotagede terletak sekitar 10 kilometer di sebelah tenggara jantung kota Yogyakarta. Wilayah itu terkenal dengan sebutan Kawasan Cagar Budaya (KCB) Kotagede yang merupakan pusat sentra kerajinan perak yang cukup terkenal di Yogyakarta. Sebagai kota tua bekas ibukota kerajaan, Kota Kotagede merupakan kota warisan (heritage) yang didalamnya terdapat makam raja-raja Mataram antara lain makan Panembahan Senopati (pendiri Mataram). Selain itu, Kotagede juga menyimpan sekitar 170 bangunan kuno yang didirikan pada tahun 1700 hingga 1930 (Rahmi dalam Anna dan Raharjo, 2018). Nilai sejarah dan budaya yang tinggi dari kawasan pusaka Kotagede tercermin pada arsitektur rumah tinggal dan kehidupan sosial masyarakat yang berada disana. Rumah tradisional yang dibangun ratusan tahun lalu dengan konstruksi kayu dan konsol kayu berukir yang disebut “bahu dhanyang” adalah ciri utama yang unik dan menarik. Demikian pula rumah Kalang yang merupakan perpaduan gaya arsitektur tradisional Jawa dan arsitektur Indisch adalah pusaka Kotagede yang sangat bernilai (UNESCO, 2007). Rovika Anna / 14512137 21 Perancangan Guest House di Kotagede Yogyakarta Dengan Pendekatan Arsitektur Rumah Kalang Gambar 2. 1 Peta Kecamatan Kotagede (BPS Kota Yogyakarta, 2017 dimofofikasi oleh penulis 2019) Selanjutnya dari UNESCO, dari waktu ke waktu, Kotagede telah mengalami banyak perubahan yang mengakibatkan pudarnya karakter asli Kotagede Beberapa hal yang mempengaruhi perubahan tersebut antara lain: a. Adanya kebutuhan untuk mewadahi kehidupan modern yang menuntut perubahan tata ruang dan desain bangunan sehingga beberapa rumah tradisional telah berganti wajah dan secara fisik menjadi rumah 'modern' baik sebagian atau seluruhnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestasi Budaya Indis Dalam Arsitektur Dan Tata Kota Semarang Pada Tahun 1900 - 1950
    MANIFESTASI BUDAYA INDIS DALAM ARSITEKTUR DAN TATA KOTA SEMARANG PADA TAHUN 1900 - 1950 SKRIPSI Diajukan Untuk Melengkapi Persyaratan Guna Mencapai Gelar Sarjana Sastra Jurusan Ilmu Sejarah Fakultas Sastra Dan Seni Rupa Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Disusun Oleh : T R I P A R T O N O C 0 5 0 5 0 0 3 F A K U L T A S S A S T R A D A N S E N I R U P A UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEBELAS MARET S U R A K A R T A 2 0 1 0 i HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN MANIFESTASI BUDAYA INDIS DALAM ARSITEKTUR DAN TATA KOTA SEMARANG PADA TAHUN 1900 - 1950 Disusun Oleh : T R I P A R T O N O C 0 5 0 5 0 0 3 Telah Disetujui oleh Pembimbing Tiwuk Kusuma H, S.S. M.Hum NIP. 197306132000032002 Mengetahui Ketua Jurusan Ilmu Sejarah Dra. Sri Wahyuningsih, M.Hum NIP. 19540223198601200 ii HALAMAN PENGESAHAN Disusun Oleh : T R I P A R T O N O C 0 5 0 5 0 0 3 Telah disetujui oleh Tim Penguji Skripsi Fakultas Sastra Dan Seni Rupa Universitas Sebelas Maret Pada Tanggal ..... ................ 2010 Jabatan Nama Tanda Tangan Drs. Warto, M. Pd Ketua NIP. 196109251986031001 (………………) Dra. Hj. Isnaini W. W, M. Pd Sekretaris NIP. 195905091985032001 (………………) Tiwuk Kusuma H, S.S. M.Hum Penguji I NIP. 197306132000032002 (………………) Drs. Soedarmono, SU Penguji II NIP. 194908131980031001 (………………) Dekan Fakultas Sastra Dan Seni Rupa Universitas Sebelas Maret Drs. Sudarno, M.A NIP. 195303141985061001 iii PERNYATAAN Nama : TRI PARTONO Nim : C 0505003 Menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa skripsi berjudul “Manifestasi Budaya Indis dalam Arsitektur dan Tata Kota Semarang Pada Tahun 1900-1950” adalah betul-betul karya sendiri, bukan dari plagiat dan tidak dibuat oleh orang lain.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Sense of Place for the Sustainability of Heritage District in Yogyakarta
    architecture&ENVIRONMENT Vol. 16, No. 2, Oct 2017: 75 - 92 EXPLORING SENSE OF PLACE FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY OF HERITAGE DISTRICT IN YOGYAKARTA Emmelia Tricia Herliana*, Himasari Hanan**, Hanson Endra Kusuma** *) Student at Doctoral Program in Architecture, School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40132, Indonesia **) Lecturer at Doctoral Program in Architecture, School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40132, Indonesia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Yogyakarta is well-known as a historical city and the centre of Javanese culture that attracts many tourists to come. In recent year, Yogyakarta has been very popular to domestic and international tourists in that many heritage places in the city have been developed to distinctive tourist destinations, yet no reasonable criteria has been developed to guide its development. This study assumed that places with distinctive identity or character or uniqueness are the most interested object of attraction for tourists. Therefore, the study will explore the sense of place as the important success factor in sustaining a heritage place as tourist attraction and identify aspects of a place that might contribute to its sustainability. Two heritage districts: Kotagede and Kotabaru are selected for evaluating aspects of place that are significantly contributing to the historical and cultural image of the city of Yogyakarta. The study identify and analyze the existing condition of physical attributes, performed activities and conception of the place. Indicators being used are developed from the current research undertaken by geographer and environmental psychologist. The study resulted to the conclusion that an interconnection of many aspects rather than identity of the place is the critical factor for the sustainability of a heritage place.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Architectural Structuralism: Archi-Cultural Pattern As a Method to Read the Meaning of Tamkesi Vernacular Architecture
    Revisiting Architectural Structuralism: Archi-Cultural Pattern as a Method to Read the Meaning of Tamkesi Vernacular Architecture Reginaldo Christophori Lake1*, Antariksa2, Purnama Salura3 1Architecture Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Indonesia 2 Architecture Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia 3 Architecture Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Indonesia * [email protected] The widespread tendency to combine vernacular with modern architecture has led to the need for an in-depth understanding of the concepts that underlie the form of vernacular architecture. Unfortunately, there has been no systematic and rigorous research method aimed explicitly at reading the architecture of vernacular settlements that do not have written data on local traditions and culture. This study puts forward the theoretical-methodological steps to read the meaning of architectural patterns in the context of vernacular settlements by elaborating Levi-Strauss' structural analysis of myths with Salura and Alexander architectural theory. This study resulted in structuralist-inductivist steps to describe, analyse, and interpret vernacular architecture. The methodological framework consists as three significant parts: Firstly, to describe the activity and form of vernacular architecture in-depth based on the anatomical scope and architectural composition-properties. Secondly, to explore the surface structure of local myths,
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Architecture of Kalang, Limasap (ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACH)
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 9, ISSUE 04, APRIL 2020 ISSN 2277-8616 Traditional Architecture Of Kalang, Limasap (ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACH) Prabani Setio Hastorahmanto, Sugiono Soetomo, Agung Budi Sardjono Abstract : Javanese traditional architecture has several forms that can be specifically identified from the shape of the roof. This form symbolizes the strata of its owner and has the function of following the traditional activities and domestic activities of its inhabitants. Research on Javanese-Indonesian homes in general has been widely carried out, but specifically for various sub-ethnic groups is still relatively limited, including for the Kalang sub-ethnic. namely a group of people who still adhere to the Kalang tradition which is an acculturation of ancient Javanese culture with Hindu-India. Through ethnographic methods, the physical meaning of the form of the Limasap roof is found, namely five sap (parts), traditional contradictory patterns of the kiwo-tengen (left-right) and the obong (burn) tradition which are still preserved and only carried out in Kalang Village. This research contributes to the preservation of ethnic or sub-ethnic groups in traditional settlements and additional knowledge about traditional Javanese houses in Indonesia. Keywords: Limasap Roof, Pole Tungko, Kiwo Room, Mantenan Room ———————————————————— 1. INTRODUCTION Javanese traditional architecture is a treasure that can be The tradition is known as the Obong tradition. A tradition learned and has a certain meaning for Javanese society. which is a ritual to take the spirits/souls of people who have The meaning shows that Javanese people have a culture passed away to Nirvana. Based on the results of the study that is realized in the form of a house.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Kotagede, Yogyakarta - Indonesia)
    Culture of Dwelling and Production of Space in the Post - Disaster Urban Transformation Processes (Case Study: Kotagede, Yogyakarta - Indonesia) vorgelegt von Gregorius Sri Wuryanto Prasetyo Utomo M.Arch geb.in Yogyakarta, Indonesien von der Fakultät VI – Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften -Dr.-Ing- genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender : Prof. Dr. Philipp Misselwitz Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Peter Herrle Gutachterin : Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andrea Haase Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 14.Juli 2014 Berlin 2014 Acknowledgements This dissertation is my academic achievement; a dynamic process of developing knowledge and understanding about people and their culture of dwelling, including their transformation processes. It has been dealt with through an intellectual discourse and many academic encounters, fruitful discussions, and also trial and error processes which have been enriched by emotional integrity in between. This study is critically based on observations and acquaintances with people and their cultures of dwelling in Kotagede, the historical Javanese town in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. From first arriving in the series of field research, I have benefited from the friendship of numerous people who assisted and advised me with various information, knowledge, and data. The following mentioned people all assisted me in various ways. I would like to express my great appreciation and deep gratitude to my supervisors, Prof. Dr. Peter Herrle, and Prof. Dr. -Ing. Andrea Haase for their valuable and constructive suggestions during the planning and development of this research work. Their willingness to give their time so generously has been very much appreciated. Furthermore, I would like to extend my great appreciation to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Heritage Post Earthquake the Case of Kotagede, Yogyakarta Indonesia
    J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 1(11)2364-2371, 2011 ISSN 2090-4304 Journal of Basic and Applied © 2011, TextRoad Publication Scientific Research www.textroad.com Reconstructing Heritage Post Earthquake The case of Kotagede, Yogyakarta Indonesia IKAPUTRA Department of Architecture & Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia ABSTRACT The historical city—Kotagede—has suffered from Yogyakarta Earthquake 2006. Around 175 traditional houses (all of types) were totally collapsed or heavily damage. Those around 30-44% of the damage architectural heritage should be reconstructed. Efforts to Reconstruct the Heritage District, such Kotagede should develop a comprehensive strategy encompassing work to revitalize tangible and intangible heritage resources. Efforts are to include Reconstructing Kotagede’s Identity, Reconstructing Kotegede’s Characters: The Folk heritage-Javanese houses, Revitalizing the Community based Silver Craft, and Re-organizing the effort to safeguard the Kotagede’s Heritage District. KEYWORDS: Architectural Heritage, Historical District, Kotagede-Yogyakarta, Post-Earthquake, Reconstruction. INTRODUCTION UNESCO (1972: 2) reminds us that the cultural heritage and the natural heritage are increasingly threatened with destruction not only by the traditional causes of decay, but also by changing social and economic conditions which aggravate the situation with even more formidable phenomena of damage or destruction. Furthermore, the natural disaster, especially earthquake, has caused devastating destruction and mostly irreparable damage of historic buildings and works of art. This is worsened by the situation that whenever an earthquake occurs most of people give more importance to the great monuments rather than the vernacular architecture which constitutes the urban fabric. (Çelebioğlu and Limoncu, 2007; 1) After the earthquake event, most of disaster managers also consider the protection of cultural heritage places as very low on their list of priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Conservation Assessment
    © Global Heritage Fund 2011 Site Conservation Assessment 1. General Information Date June 15, 2011 Site Name Kotagede Country Indonesia Site Status National Heritage Assessor Name Punto Wijayanto Institution Centre for Heritage Conservation Department of Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada University Jl. Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta Profession Architect/Planner/Heritage expert Affiliations Badan Pelestarian Pusaka Indonesia/BPPI (Indonesian Heritage Trust) Jl. Veteran I No. 24, Jakarta Date of site visit May-June 2011 Previous history • Project “Damaged Heritage Rapid Assessment”, 2006 with the site • Project “CSRPP-JRF”, 2009-2011 Site Description • Kotagede Heritage District is situated some 5 kilometers southeast off the center of Yogyakarta City in Yogyakarta Special Region (DIY) (250 words or less) Province, Indonesia. (see App.1) • It was the center of Mataram Kingdom in 16th C, but lost its role when the center of power was shifted to Kerta/Plered (1613). Following the Giyanti Treaty (1755), Mataram Kingdom, including Kotagede, was split between Yogyakarta and Surakarta Sultanate, which later becomes modern Yogyakarta City and Surakarta City, Central Java. After independence of Indonesia, Kota Gede was absorbed into Yogyakarta City and Bantul Regency. • Administratively, it covers three villages: Kelurahan Prenggan and Purbayan (Yogyakarta City) and Desa Jagalan (Bantul Regency). • It covers an area on the east bank of Gajah Wong river: 83 ha (Prenggan), 99 ha (Purbayan) and 27 ha (Jagalan). • According to the Statistics Indonesia/Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), the population of Kotagede in 2007: 11.370 (Prenggan), 9.704 (Purbayan) and 3.446 (Jagalan). • It’s still today center for commerce and local industries, such as silver handycraft which make Kotagede known as silver city.
    [Show full text]
  • N O V E M B E R 9 , 2 0 1 7
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332108702 Estimated Distribution Illumination Using a Standard Deviation Based On The Best Window Openings Conference Paper · November 2017 CITATIONS READS 0 628 1 author: Yose Rizal Universitas Lancang Kuning Pekanbaru 7 PUBLICATIONS 9 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Yose Rizal on 31 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. N O V E M B E R 9 , 2 0 1 7 D E P A R T M E N T O F A R C H I T E C T U R E FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND PLANNING I N S T I T U T T E K N O L O G I S E P U L U H N O P E M B E R PROCEEDINGS 9th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH AND DESIGN AR+DC 2017 Decoding Ideas and Thinking in Architecture Copyright Department of Architecture ITS Surabaya @2017 Editors: Arina Hayati Collinthia Erwindi Kirami Bararatin Nurfahmi Muchlis Nopember 2017 Publisher: Department of Architecture Faculty of Architecture Design and Planning Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Kampus ITS, Sukolilo Surabaya, Indonesia, 60111 All Right Reserved 9th International Conference on Architecture Research and Design (AR+DC) ii Foreword First of all, I would like to thanks to Department of Architecture and colleagues in making this international conference on architecture research and design happen. It is quite hard to manage and interpret the very interesting theme regarding how the architect think and how the idea is processed, not only they allow for subjective interpretation but also to be able in decoding intangible steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the History and Architecture
    DIMENSI − Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, Vol. 41, No. 1, July 2014, 37-42 DOI: 10.9744/dimensi.41.1.37-42 ISSN 0126-219X (print) / ISSN 2338-7858 (online) THE CONCEPT OF MODERN DUTCH COLONIAL ARCHITECTURE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF JAVANESE ARCHITECTURE ARDIYANTO, Antonius1*; DJUNAEDI, Achmad1; IKAPUTRA, Suryabrata1; DJADMIKA, Adi1 1 Gadjah Mada University, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Department Jalan Grafika No. 2 Campus UGM, Yogyakarta 55581, INDONESIA * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Modern architecture colonial present in the early 20th century, when several Dutch graduate architects had begun profession in the Dutch East Indies. The architects of had understood that the development of modern architecture in the East Indies must include the local environment and climate aspects of traditional architecture that has existed in the Dutch East Indies. In this case, two famous architects, the Thomas Karsten and Henri Maclaine Pont, became a pioneers in this movement. The concept of the modern architecture development base on the Java architecture has been carried out by Thomas Karsten with several his works such as office buildings, hospitals, markets, and schools. The potential of traditional Javanese architecture in terms of shape, material and solving the problems of the tropical climate conditions, aims to achieve comfort in the building the use of potencies has been used as a concept for the development of modern Dutch colonial architecture. Keywords: Javanese architecture; modern colonial architecture. INTRODUCTION At that time several professional architects began to express their idea to apply traditional architectural In Indonesia, the development of the mixture of elements in the design of modern buildings of traditional architecture into modern architecture colonial Dutch architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifikasi Unsur-Unsur Arsitektural Rumah Kalang Di Kotagede Yogyakarta
    Contents available at: www.repository.unwira.ac.id https://journal.unwira.ac.id/index.php/ARTEKS Research paper doi: http://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.85 Identifikasi unsur-unsur arsitektural rumah kalang di Kotagede Yogyakarta Maria Widianingtias, Sidhi Pramudito*, Gerarda Orbita Ida Cahyandari Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta Jl. Babarsari no. 44, Yogyakarta - 55281, Indonesia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Identification of architectural elements of kalang house in Received July 29, 2019 Kotagede Yogyakarta Received in revised form August 03, 2019 Kalang house on Jalan Mondorakan, Kotagede is a Javanese Accepted September 27, 2019 traditional house built and owned by Javanese people by adopting Available online April 01, 2020 architectural elements from art nouveau and art deco architecture. Kalang house reflects Javanese houses in terms of spatial aspects, roof shape, and some Javanese ornaments. Whereas the influence of Keywords: art nouveau and art deco are shown from themed ornaments and are Architectural elements the result of stilation of flora and fauna which are different with Art Deco ornamentation in traditional Javanese houses. This study aims to Art Nouveau identify architectural elements in kalang houses and find out what Javanese traditional house factors influence the differences and similarities in the processing of Kalang house architectural elements in kalang house. This study uses descriptive methods through case studies in the field with analysis through qualitative
    [Show full text]