DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sale of Scottishpower and Hydro-Electric

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sale of Scottishpower and Hydro-Electric NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORTBYTHE COMPTROLLERAND AUDITOR GENERAL TheSale of ScottishPowerand Hydro-Electric ORDEREDBY THE HOUSEOF COMMONS TO BE PRINTED IO JULY 1992 LONDON: HMSO 113 f6.55 NET THESALE OF SCOTTISHPOWERAND HYDRO-ELECTRIC This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act, 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office Comptroller and Auditor General 3 July 1992 The Comptroller and Auditor General is the head of the National Audit Office employing some 900 staff. He, and the NAO, are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies: and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. THESALE OF SCOTTISHPOWERAND HYDRO-ELECTRIC Contents Pages Summary and conclusions 1 Part 1: The companies and the sale 6 Part 2: Achievement of objectives 8 Part 3: Control of costs 20 Glossary of terms 23 Appendices 1. Electricity industry restructuring in Scotland 24 2. Authorised supply areas of ScottishPower and Hydra-Electric 26 3. List of the principal advisers and contractors appointed by the Department 27 THESALE OF SCOTTISHPOWERAND HYDRO-ELECTRIC Summary and conclusions 1 In June 1991 the Scottish Office Industry Department (the Department), acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for Scotland, sold 100 per cent of the shares in the two Scottish electricity companies Scottish Power plc (ScottishPower) and Scottish Hydro-Electric plc (Hydra-Electric) for just under E3.5 billion, payable in two forms: nearly g2.9 billion from the sale of shares, and some SO.6 billion from the staged repayment of injected debt. In preparing the companies for the sale, the Department wrote off some El billion of National Loans Fund debt. 2 The sale was the last stage in the Government’s programme to privatise the electricity industry in Great Britain. It followed the sale of the twelve regional electricity companies in England and Wales, in December 1990, and the partial sale of the two generating companies, National Power and PowerGen, in March 1991. 3 The Scottish companies generate, transmit, distribute and supply electricity. They face competition from each other, and from other companies, for the generation and supply of electricity to customers in Scotland. Each of the Scottish companies has the monopoly of the transmission and distribution of electricity within its authorised supply area. They may also compete in the electricity generation and supply markets of England and Wales. 4 The companies were floated on the London Stock Exchange. The Department offered for sale some 1.2 billion shares at E2.40 each, payable in three instalments. 5 The Government’s overriding objective was to complete the privatisation of the electricity industry in Great Britain within the lifetime of the Parliament. Within that overriding objective, the Department sought in relation to the Scottish sale: to maximise net proceeds; to achieve a modest premium on the issue price in the period following the start of dealing; to promote individual share ownership, firstly in Scotland, but also in the United Kingdom as a whole; and to encourage share ownership by individual company customers and employees. 6 This report sets out the results of a National Audit Office examination of how far the Department achieved their objectives for the sale, and how they controlled its costs. The National Audit Office examined Departmental papers, held discussions with Departmental officials and advisers, and consulted senior executives of the two companies. The National Audit Office were assisted in their work by Hambros Bank Limited. Achievement of 7 The National Audit Office’s main findings and conclusions are: objectives On the overriding objective of completing the iale to timetable (a) The Department achieved the privatisation of ScottishPower and Hydro- Electric by June 1991, selling all their shareholding in each of the companies (paragraphs 2.2 to 2.4). 1 THESALE OF SCOT’I’ISHPOWRAND WDRO-ELECTRIC On maximising net proceeds subject to achieving a healthy aftermarket Method of sale I$) The Department decided to sell the companies by~floating them on the London Stock Exchange as they considered that this method of sale would best meet their objective of promoting increased individual share ownership, while maximising sale proceeds through creating competitive tension between individual, institutional and overseas investors (paragraph 2.6). Valuation of the companies: assets (cl The Department reviewed the bases on which the companies’ fixed assets were valued, and carried out a revaluation exercise which included identifying properties which might have significant alternative use values (paragraphs 2.10 to 2.16). (d) The Department introduced clawback provisions on property with the aim of enabling the taxpayer to share in future gains from property disposals or deemed disposals by the companies (paragraphs 2.17 and 2.18). Debt (e) Both companies inherited high levels of debt from their predecessor boards. The Department sought to maximise proceeds by keeping to a minimum the amount of debt written off, while at the same time ensuring the long term financial viability of both companies. This involved a net write-off of Government debt of E417.7 million (paragraphs 2.19 to 2.25). Profit and dividend estimates and prospects (fJ Following intensive negotiations with both companies, the Department secured their agreement to estimates of profits and dividends for the year ended 31 March 1991 which they judged satisfactory and to positive statements on prospects for dividend growth in subsequent years (paragraphs 2.26 to 2.29). Corporation tax losses (gl The Department wrote off the balance of outstanding corporation tax losses, arising out of unused capital allowances, in each company, amounting in total to s505 million (paragraphs 2.30 and 2.31). Partial or full sale (h) The Department identified a number of factors which pointed in favour of a full sale in June 1991. The Secretary of State decided to sell all the Government’s shareholding in the companies (paragraphs 2.32 to 2.34). Carrying out the sale (i) In carrying out the sale, the Department adopted a number of measures first used by the Department of Energy in the sale of National Power and PowerGen. 2 THE SALEOF SCOTTISHPOWERAND HMRO-ELECTRIC Bookbuilding (j) Institutional and overseas investors were required to indicate, in advance of pricing the offer, how much they would be prepared to invest at a range of yields; this is known as bookbuilding (paragraphs 2.36 and 2.37). Underwriting (k) The Department dispensed with primary underwriting, bearing the risk themselves of failure to secure adequate sub-underwriting of the offer and of the offer being undersubscribed (paragraphs 2.38 and 2.39). Back-end tender (1) A proportion of shares was provisionally earmarked for offer to the highest bidders from institutional and overseas investors after the close of the offer period; this is known as a back-end tender (paragraph 2.40). Implementation of the back-end tender raised additional proceeds of ~C42.25million (paragraph 2.51). Pricing the offer (m) The Department took the view that in pricing the offer at a yield of 5.1 per cent they would maximise proceeds and minimise the risk of exciting excess demand while still attaining their target premium. In deciding not to price the offer at a yield of 5.2 per cent, they accepted a greater risk that the anticipated premium might be eroded over the offer period but judged that risk to be acceptably low. The difference between selling the shares at 5.1 per cent rather than 5.2 per cent represented additional proceeds of ~!Z55million (paragraphs 2.43 to 2.46). Aftermarket premium (n) The premiums at which the shares opened at the start of trading were within the Department’s target range of 5 to 10 per cent of the full offer price, equivalent to 12 to 24 pence. On the second day’s dealing ScottishPower’s shares fell just below the bottom end of the target premium range, closing at a premium of 10.5 pence. They traded mostly below that premium for some months after the sale. Over the same period, Hydro-Electric shares traded mostly at higher premiums. In the six months following the close of the first day’s trading, the share prices of both companies reduced relative to the electricity sector and to the market as a whole and, whilst mostly remaining above the offer price, moved below the aftermarket target premium range (paragraphs 2.52 and 2.53). On promoting increased individual share ownership Incentives for individuals (0) In order to avoid adverse media comment and the risk of an unsuccessful sale in Scotland, the Department offered customers of the two companies equivalent payment terms and incentives to those offered to customers of the regional electricity companies (paragraphs 2.60 to 2.62). Incentives for employees (p) Incentives offered to employees were in line with those offered to employees in the other electricity sales which represented a higher return than incentives offered in certain other past privatisations (paragraphs 2.63 to 2.66). 3 THE SALEOF SCOTTISHPOWERAND WDRO-ELECTRIC Target subscription levels (q) The Department met their target for subscription levels (3 to 4 times the initial public offer) from individual investors (paragraph 2.67). Share allocation (r) 10.3 per cent of the shares offered to individuals were allocated to company employees and pensioners. Customers investing in their supplying company were allocated 35.6 per cent (paragraph 2.70). Share retention (s) 67 per cent of individual shareholders in both companies had retained their shares at 31 December 1991.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence Raphael J. Heffron
    Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence EPRG Working Paper 1407 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1457 Raphael J. Heffron and William J. Nuttall Abstract This paper examines the role of nuclear energy in Scotland, and the concerns for Scotland as it votes for independence. The aim is to focus directly on current Scottish energy policy and its relationship to nuclear energy. The paper does not purport to advise on a vote for or against Scottish independence but aims to further the debate in an underexplored area of energy policy that will be of value whether Scotland secures independence or further devolution. There are four central parts to this paper: (1) consideration of the Scottish electricity mix; (2) an analysis of a statement about nuclear energy made by the Scottish energy minister; (3) examination of nuclear energy issues as presented in the Scottish Independence White Paper; and (4) the issue of nuclear waste is assessed. A recurrent theme in the analysis is that whether one is for, against, or indifferent to new nuclear energy development, it highlights a major gap in Scotland’s energy and environmental policy goals. Too often, the energy policy debate from the Scottish Government perspective has been reduced to a low-carbon energy development debate between nuclear energy and renewable energy. There is little reflection on how to reduce Scottish dependency on fossil fuels. For Scotland to aspire to being a low-carbon economy, to decarbonising its electricity market, and to being a leader within the climate change community, it needs to tackle the issue of how to stop the continuation of burning fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS REPORT on SEISMIC RE-EVALUATION English Only Text
    Unclassified NEA/CSNI/R(98)5 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques OLIS : 10-Nov-1998 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Dist. : 16-Nov-1998 __________________________________________________________________________________________ English text only Unclassified NEA/CSNI/R(98)5 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS STATUS REPORT ON SEISMIC RE-EVALUATION English text English only 71673 Document incomplet sur OLIS Incomplete document on OLIS NEA/CSNI/R(98)5 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter; Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996) and the Republic of Korea (12th December 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc
    Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2019 Registered No.: SC213460 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Contents Page No. Directors and Other Information 1 Strategic Report 2 Corporate Governance Statement 12 Directors' Report 15 Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Strategic Report, the Directors' Report and the Financial 16 statements Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc 17 Profit and Loss Account 21 Balance Sheet 22 Statement of Changes in Equity 23 Cash Flow Statement 24 Notes on the Financial statements 25 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors and Other Information Directors Gregor Alexander (Chairman) Steven Kennedy (Resigned 07/09/18) Stuart Hogarth David Gardner (Resigned 31/01/19) Colin Nicol Dale Cargill Alistair Borthwick (Appointed 07/09/18, Resigned 28/06/19) Robert McDonald (Appointed 31/01/19) Rachel McEwen Katherine Marshall David Rutherford (Non-Executive Director) Gary Steel (Non-Executive Director) Registered office Inveralmond House 200 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 3AQ Secretary Mark McLaughlin Auditor KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants 319 St Vincent Street Glasgow G2 5AS Registered number SC213460 1 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Strategic Report The Strategic Report sets out the main trends and factors underlying the development and performance of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc (the “Company”) during the year ended 31 March 2019, as well as those matters which are likely to affect its future development and performance. The business, its objectives and strategy The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SSE plc (the “Group”).
    [Show full text]
  • Coasts and Seas of the United Kingdom. Region 4 South-East Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 4 South-east Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1997 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck, R.M. Sumerling Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF-UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy: the Big Lie
    The Trap Chapter 6 Nuclear Energy: The Big Lie You believe that it is possible to make a very major change in our energy policy? Yes. Technology is now available which would allow us to transform the way we produce and use energy. If we seize the opportunity to make a radical change, the effects would be extraordinarily beneficial to the economy, the environment and public safety. What has suddenly changed to make you so optimistic? The Cold War has ended. During the Cold War, the principal weapons were nuclear. Nuclear energy was an extension of military research and both were to some degree controlled by the same state scientific elites, which for reasons of national security maintained secrecy even when the nuclear programme was extended to non-military projects. Successive governments believed that if problems arose in the civil project, these should be kept secret so as not to endanger the military programme. At first it was thought that nuclear energy would be safe and unlimited, and therefore would put an end to western dependence on imported energy. It was also believed that electricity generated by nuclear means would be, as the Chairman of the US Atomic Energy Commission declared, 'too cheap to meter'.1 Western governments devoted a major part of their resources to developing nuclear energy. Between 1979 and 1990 the member nations of the International Energy Agency spent nearly 60 per cent of their energy research budget on nuclear power. Only 9.4 per cent was devoted to developing renewable sources of energy and 6.4 per cent to methods for saving energy.2 With almost unlimited state backing, nuclear scientists and administrators operated in secret and above the law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • SSE Annual Report 2006
    POWERFUL OPPORTUNITIES Scottish and Southern Energy plc Annual Report 2006 Scottish and Southern Energy Annual Report 2006 Contents Chairman’s Statement 1 Directors’ Report 28 Dividends 59 What We Do 2 Corporate Governance 29 Earnings Per Share 60 Where We Are 4 Organisation and Structure 29 Intangible Assets 61 Key Performance Indicators 6 Board Effectiveness 30 Property, Plant and Equipment 63 Chief Executive’s Statement 8 Board Commitees 30 Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures 64 Audit Committee 30 Subsidiary Undertakings 66 Directors’ Statement 9 Remuneration Committee 31 Acquisitions and Disposals 68 Financial Overview 9 Nomination Committee 31 Inventories 70 Energy Systems 9 Risk Committee 32 Trade and Other Receivables 70 Generation and Supply 13 Executive Committee 32 Cash and Cash Equivalents 70 Contracting, Connections and Metering 20 Health, Safety and Environmental Advisory Committee 32 Trade and Other Payables 71 Gas Storage 21 Internal Control and Risk Management Current Tax Liabilities 71 Telecoms 22 Committee 32 Construction Contracts 71 Exceptional Items 22 Going Concern 33 Loans and Other Borrowings 71 Capital Expenditure 22 Communication with Shareholders Deferred Taxation 74 Financial Management 23 and Major Business Stakeholders 33 Provisions 75 Tax 23 Share Capital 76 Balance Sheet 25 Directors’ Biographies and Responsibilities 34 Reserves 76 Purchase of own Shares 25 Remuneration Report 36 Minority Interests 77 Corporate Responsibility 25 Retirement Benefit Obligations 78 Strategy and Outlook 25 Independent
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 the Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Statement and Consultation
    West Islay Tidal Energy Park Environmental Statement WEST ISLAY TIDAL ENERGY PARK VOLUME 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION, POLICY, CONTEXT, EIA & DESCRIPTION 1. Introduction 2. Legislative & Policy Context 3. Site Selection Process and Alternatives Considered 4. The Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Statement & Consultation 5. Project Description 6. Physical Environment SECTION 2: BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 7. Mammals 8. Benthic Ecology 9. Otters 10. Birds 11. Natural Fish SECTION 3: HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 12. Commercial Fish 13. Archaeology 14. Shipping & Navigation 15. Landscape & Seascape Visual 16. Traffic & Transport 17. Recreation and Amenity 18. Socio-economic 19. Noise 20. EMF SECTION 4: SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS, MITIGATION & MONITORING 21. Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Monitoring West Islay Tidal Energy Park Environmental Statement ________________________________________________________________ Preface This Environmental Statement (ES) is prepared, by DP Marine Energy Ltd (DPME), in support of an application for statutory consents for West Islay Tidal Energy Park (the Project). The Project is being developed jointly by DPME and DEME Blue Energy (DBE) on the behalf of West Islay Tidal Energy Park Limited a special purpose Scottish Company which has been incorporated to build and operate the Project. The Project consists of the installation of 30MW of Tidal Energy Converters and associated infrastructure including the export cables to landfall on Islay The proposed array of tidal energy devices will be located approximately 6km (at its closest point) from the south west tip of the island of Islay in Argyll and Bute, Scotland. The proposed landfall for the associated electricity export cable will be located adjacent to Kintra Farm on the west coast of Islay.
    [Show full text]
  • Endless Trouble: Britain's Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant
    Endless Trouble Britain’s Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) Martin Forwood, Gordon MacKerron and William Walker Research Report No. 19 International Panel on Fissile Materials Endless Trouble: Britain’s Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) © 2019 International Panel on Fissile Materials This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License To view a copy of this license, visit ww.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 On the cover: the world map shows in highlight the United Kingdom, site of THORP Dedication For Martin Forwood (1940–2019) Distinguished colleague and dear friend Table of Contents About the IPFM 1 Introduction 2 THORP: An Operational History 4 THORP: A Political History 11 THORP: A Chronology 1974 to 2018 21 Endnotes 26 About the authors 29 About the IPFM The International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) was founded in January 2006 and is an independent group of arms control and nonproliferation experts from both nuclear- weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states. The mission of the IPFM is to analyze the technical basis for practical and achievable pol- icy initiatives to secure, consolidate, and reduce stockpiles of highly enriched uranium and plutonium. These fissile materials are the key ingredients in nuclear weapons, and their control is critical to achieving nuclear disarmament, to halting the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and to ensuring that terrorists do not acquire nuclear weapons. Both military and civilian stocks of fissile materials have to be addressed. The nuclear- weapon states still have enough fissile materials in their weapon stockpiles for tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. On the civilian side, enough plutonium has been sepa- rated to make a similarly large number of weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Network Review
    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Term Storage of Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor (Agr) Fuel Xa9951796 P.N
    IAEA-SM-352/28 THE LONG TERM STORAGE OF ADVANCED GAS-COOLED REACTOR (AGR) FUEL XA9951796 P.N. STANDRING Thorp Technical Department, British Nuclear Fuels pic, Sellafield, Seascale, Cumbria, United Kingdom Abstract The approach being taken by BNFL in managing the AGR lifetime spent fuel arisings from British Energy reactors is given. Interim storage for up to 80 years is envisaged for fuel delivered beyond the life of the Thorp reprocessing plant. Adopting a policy of using existing facilities, to comply with the principles of waste minimisation, has defined the development requirements to demonstrate that this approach can be undertaken safely and business issues can be addressed. The major safety issues are the long term integrity of both the fuel being stored and structure it is being stored in. Business related issues reflect long term interactions with the rest of the Sellafield site and storage optimisation. Examples of the developement programme in each of these areas is given. 1. INTRODUCTION British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) has been contracted to manage the lifetime irradiated AGR fuel arisings from British Energy reactors1. The agreement formulated is a mixture of reprocessing (covering the planned life of the Thorp reprocessing plant) and interim storage for the remainder of the fuel arisings. Interim storage is projected to be up to 80 years to comply with direct disposal acceptance criteria and projected repository availability. Eighty years represents a significant increase in storage times compared to current operational experience; of around 18 years. Confidence that AGR fuel can be stored safely for extended periods has been provided by our experience of storing AGR fuel to date and the supporting research and development programmes initiated in the late 1970's for wet storage and 1990's in the case of Scottish Nuclear (SNL) dry storage project.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc
    Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2020 Registered No.: SC213460 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Contents Page No. Directors and Other Information 1 Strategic Report 2 Corporate Governance Statement 16 Directors' Report 20 Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Strategic Report, the Directors' Report and the Financial 22 statements Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc 23 Profit and Loss Account 35 Balance Sheet 36 Statement of Changes in Equity 37 Cash Flow Statement 38 Notes on the Financial statements 39 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors and Other Information Directors Gregor Alexander (Non-Executive Director) (Chairman) Stuart Hogarth (Resigned 23/03/20) Colin Nicol Dale Cargill (Resigned 23/01/20) Alistair Borthwick (Resigned 28/06/19) Robert McDonald Rachel McEwen (Non-Executive Director) Katherine Marshall (Non-Executive Director) Mark Rough (Appointed 01/04/20) David Rutherford (Independent Non-Executive Director) Gary Steel (Independent Non-Executive Director) Registered office Inveralmond House 200 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 3AQ Secretary Mark McLaughlin Auditor Ernst & Young LLP Chartered Accountants 5 George Square Glasgow G2 1DY Registered number SC213460 1 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Strategic Report The Strategic Report sets out the main trends and factors underlying the development and performance of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc (the “Company”) during the year ended 31 March 2020, as well as those matters which are likely to affect its future development and performance. The business, its objectives and strategy The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SSE plc (the “Group”).
    [Show full text]