DOCSLIB.ORG

(For Official Use Only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1188 Should You Wish to Submit a Public Petition for Consideration by the Public P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(For Official Use Only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1188 Should You Wish to Submit a Public Petition for Consideration by the Public P (For official use only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1188 Should you wish to submit a public petition for consideration by the Public Petitions Committee please refer to the guidance leaflet How to submit a public petition and the Guidance Notes at the back of this form. 1. NAME OF PRINCIPAL PETITIONER Nick Dekker 2. TEXT OF PETITION Nick Dekker calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to investigate the circumstances whereby it agreed that 60 hydro-power stations could be accredited for subsidy under the Renewables Obligation scheme and that generation capacity could be cut to below the 20megawatt qualification threshold at others to enable accreditation and whether, in the interests of electricity consumers, it will rescind these accreditations. 3. ACTION TAKEN TO RESOLVE ISSUES OF CONCERN BEFORE SUBMITTING THE PETITION I have contacted and have been in correspondence with AuditScotland, OFGEM, Scottish & Southern Energy PLC and ScottishPower PLC. Alex Neil MSP also corresponded with Scottish & Southern Energy. 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See— “The war on climate change – A licence to print money?” “Subsidies and Subterfuge – Hydro-power and the Renewables Obligation” (also on www.swap.org.uk) “ROCs earned by Alcan, SSE and ScottishPower from 'old build' hydro, April 2002 to December 2007” (a report by the petitioners); “Renewable Energy Data for Scotland (Hydro), May 2008” Correspondence generally pertinent to the petition but esp to Question 3 OFGEM’s “Annual Reports on the Renewables Obligation” 2004 to 2008; Press releases and other material referred to in “The war on climate change – a licence to print money?” and elsewhere 5. DO YOU WISH YOUR PETITION TO BE HOSTED ON THE PARLIAMENT’S WEBSITE AS AN E-PETITION? 1 YES NO If “Yes” please enter a closing date for gathering signatures on your petition (we usually recommend a period of around six weeks). Please also provide at least one comment to set the scene for an on-line discussion on the petition, not exceeding ten lines of text. CLOSING DATE 30 August 2008 COMMENTS TO STIMULATE ON-LINE DISCUSSION If public money is given to a private company to encourage it to invest in projects deemed to be to the public benefit, there should be clear evidence that (a) the investment is for something the company would not have done on its own accord and (b) there is a clear and transparent equivalence between what is given to the company and what it invests. Neither test was met when the Scottish Executive agreed that already existing hydro-electric power stations could be accredited under the Renewables Obligation scheme. In practice, it meant (a) a reduction in hydro generating capacity and (b) the generators being paid 20 times over for their investment at a time of widespread fuel poverty. We are calling on the Scottish Parliament to investigate the decision and its financial consequences and to consider whether the subsidies should be withdrawn. 2 The war on climate change – A licence to print money? A petition calling on the Scottish Parliament to investigate the circumstances whereby the Scottish Executive agreed that extant hydro-power stations could be accredited for subsidy under the Renewables Obligation scheme, that generation capacity could be cut at others to enable accreditation and if it is in the interests of electricity consumers that the Scottish Government take steps to rescind the accreditations. EVERYONE IS aware that the mechanism for driving the development of renewable electricity generation in Scotland is the Renewables Obligation (Scotland) (ROS) and that it is one of several parallel schemes across the UK. Fewer grasp how these complex ‘carrot-and-stick’ regimes work.1 In essence, they offer an incentive to invest in approved types of generating plant by, on the one hand, making it compulsory to supply a proportion of electricity from renewable sources while, on the other, offering high levels of subsidy for doing so. Consultation on the schemes, which ran from March 1999 to March 2001, addressed the issue of a portfolio of small hydro installations, mostly in private hands and sometimes dating back to Edwardian times, which had fallen into disrepair or disuse and of how its owners might be enticed to bring it back into production. The key notion was that they could be accredited to the RO/ROS and treated as new plant if they were refurbished to an agreed standard or had been refurbished within the previous 12 years. In the run-up to the launch of the schemes in April 2002, the electricity supply sector was, for a variety of reasons, cash-starved. In spite of this, government and stakeholders agreed that existing ‘large’ hydro-power stations should, as a mature and profitable technology, be excluded from the subsidies regime: Large-scale schemes will be taken here as having an installed generating capacity of greater than 5 MW. The assumption is that large-scale schemes would be developed and operated by major electricity utilities. (May 1999) 2 While relatively well-established technologies such as large scale hydro and energy from waste will count towards achievement of the 10% target, they will be excluded from the Obligation. (October 2000) 3 The majority view on hydro power was that the Government is right to exclude large-scale hydro power from the Renewables Obligation. (March 2001) 4 Whitehall initially saw no reason why this situation should change and the (then) Scottish Executive presumably concurred. This was proper. Building a new hydro station does incur high up-front costs but most of these are in the dams, tunnels and infrastructure – the turbines are comparatively cheap. The capital cost of Scotland’s hydro stations was written off decades ago and, though they may have been expensive to build, they are cheap to maintain and particularly long-lasting. In operational terms, hydro is superior to other renewable sources such as wind because, being storable, it is available pretty well on demand and, because it can come on- and go off-line at short notice, it attracts above average prices. 1 Strictly speaking, the Renewables Obligation schemes are levies on electricity consumers, not fiscally-funded subsidies, but subsidy is the term generally used. The ROS is administered by OFGEM, not the Scottish Government. 2 DTI, New and Renewable Energy – Prospects for the 21st Century; Supporting Analysis, May 1999, pps 87 & 91. 3 DTI, ibid – Preliminary Consultation, October 2000, p 3, emphasis added. 4 DTI, ibid – Analysis of the Responses to the Consultation Paper, March 2001, p 6. Contrary to popular perception, neither the construction nor the upkeep of any station in the Scottish hydro portfolio was ever state-funded or subsidised when in public ownership. Historically, Scotland’s hydro power had hitherto been self-sufficient. However, by 2001, generators were pressing the government to subsidise the technology for the first time ever and continued their lobbying after public consultation closed. Blaming ageing plant and poor trading conditions, Scottish and Southern Energy even threatened to ‘de-commission’ stations unless a subsidy mechanism could be found for all but the very largest of its stations. 5 In the event, one was – two significant changes were included in the Renewables Obligation regulations that came into force on 1 April 2002. Neither had been the subject of public consultation. The first change – lowering the bar The public was at least told about this change, albeit post hoc. It raised the limit below which the existing hydro power schemes qualified for subsidy, at first from 5 MW to 10 then, later, from 10 MW to 20. In March 2001, the DTI had reported that: Eligible supplies ...may exclude hydro-electric schemes . exceeding 10 MW since large scale hydro has long been established in the market and is in a position to compete in the open market with fossil-sourced energy. 6 By June, the limit had again been increased: We, therefore, propose to exclude existing stations with a declared net capacity (DNC) of over 20 MW from the Obligation, but to include any stations first commissioned after the date of the Order is made, regardless of capacity. 7 Although no rationale for these changes has been offered, refurbishing a station to secure accreditation was certainly an enticing investment. The owners had only to replace, or have recently replaced, the moving parts in a turbine, something which is (self-evidently) done from time to time in any event. The move costs little but adds at least thirty years to the life of the plant – roughly the same as the life of a thermal power station and probably twice that of a wind turbine. It was justified on the grounds that refurbishment would restore electricity output to original levels and, in some cases at least, increase it due to design improvements. Power companies, politicians and others claimed efficiency gains of up to ten per cent.8 Even if this figure is accepted (it can readily be shown to be exaggerated), it means that the subsidy per MWh of additional generation capacity created by refurbishing hydro is, by definition, ten times higher than that paid to those who develop new capacity from scratch. Audit Scotland reported that the issue was outwith its remit and it fell to the petitioners and to politicians to approach the major hydro generators for details of what they spent on refurbishment to secure accreditation and on how this compared to the financial benefit they received. Although they declined to provide this ‘equivalence information’, a reasonable estimate of both can be derived from data in the public domain, from general industry knowledge and from press reports on the refurbishment programme. The petitioners calculate that: 5 See, e.g., House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Proceedings, 21 March 2001.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (Pdf, 1.34
    Mapping of the Energy and Environment Sector in Wales A Final Report Creating a Competitive Edge for People, Places & Organisations Contents Section Subject Page No Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Energy & Environment Sector Definition 2 3 Energy & Environment Sector Survey Analysis 6 3.1 Introduction 6 3.2 Headline Survey Analysis 9 3.3 Sub-Sector Analysis 39 3.4 Estimating the Scale of the Sector 68 3.5 Summary SWOT Analysis 73 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 82 Appendices I Energy & Environment Mapping Study Approach I II Energy & Environment Survey Questionnaire III III Energy & Environment Sector Evidence Base XVIII IV Academic Energy & Environment Sector Specialisms XXX V Energy & Environment Sector Business Support XXXVIII 26th June 2014 Simon Hallam Innovas Consulting Ltd R1-2 Verdin Exchange, High Street Winsford Cheshire CW7 2AN Main Office: 01606-551122 Mob: 07411 371810 Website: www.innovas.co.uk E-mail: [email protected] This proposal contains financial and other information which should be regarded as ‘commercial in confidence’ by those to whom it is addressed, and which should not be disclosed to third parties unless agreed with Innovas. Until information to be released has been authorised in writing by us for release, we assert our right under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act for the entirety of its proposals to be considered exempt from release. Executive Summary Energy & Environment Sector Scale and Composition Wales is home to a thriving, well balanced and growing energy and environmental sector with a market value (sales turnover) of £4.76 billion employing about 58,000 people in 2,066 companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence Raphael J. Heffron
    Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence EPRG Working Paper 1407 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1457 Raphael J. Heffron and William J. Nuttall Abstract This paper examines the role of nuclear energy in Scotland, and the concerns for Scotland as it votes for independence. The aim is to focus directly on current Scottish energy policy and its relationship to nuclear energy. The paper does not purport to advise on a vote for or against Scottish independence but aims to further the debate in an underexplored area of energy policy that will be of value whether Scotland secures independence or further devolution. There are four central parts to this paper: (1) consideration of the Scottish electricity mix; (2) an analysis of a statement about nuclear energy made by the Scottish energy minister; (3) examination of nuclear energy issues as presented in the Scottish Independence White Paper; and (4) the issue of nuclear waste is assessed. A recurrent theme in the analysis is that whether one is for, against, or indifferent to new nuclear energy development, it highlights a major gap in Scotland’s energy and environmental policy goals. Too often, the energy policy debate from the Scottish Government perspective has been reduced to a low-carbon energy development debate between nuclear energy and renewable energy. There is little reflection on how to reduce Scottish dependency on fossil fuels. For Scotland to aspire to being a low-carbon economy, to decarbonising its electricity market, and to being a leader within the climate change community, it needs to tackle the issue of how to stop the continuation of burning fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft Power Stations Generated Together the Original Boiler Plant Had Reached 30 Years for 10 Years
    AGECROl?T POWER STATIONS 1924-1993 - About the author PETER HOOTON joined the electricity supply industry in 1950 at Agecroft A as a trainee. He stayed there until his retirement as maintenance service manager in 1991. Peter approached the brochure project in the same way that he approached work - with dedication and enthusiasm. The publication reflects his efforts. Acknowledgements MA1'/Y. members and ex members of staff have contributed to this history by providing technical information and their memories of past events In the long life of the station. Many of the tales provided much laughter but could not possibly be printed. To everyone who has provided informati.on and stories, my thanks. Thanks also to:. Tony Frankland, Salford Local History Library; Andrew Cross, Archivist; Alan Davies, Salford Mining Museum; Tony Glynn, journalist with Swinton & Pendlebury Journal; Bob Brooks, former station manager at Bold Power Station; Joan Jolly, secretary, Agecroft Power Station; Dick Coleman from WordPOWER; and - by no means least! - my wife Margaret for secretarial help and personal encouragement. Finally can I thank Mike Stanton for giving me lhe opportunity to spend many interesting hours talkin11 to coUcagues about a place that gave us years of employment. Peter Hooton 1 September 1993 References Brochure of the Official Opening of Agecroft Power Station, 25 September 1925; Salford Local History Library. Brochure for Agecroft B and C Stations, published by Central Electricity Generating Board; Salford Local Published by NationaJ Power, History Library. I September, 1993. Photographic albums of the construction of B and (' Edited and designed by WordPOWER, Stations; Salford Local Histo1y Libraty.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tour in Sutherlandshire : with Extracts from the Field-Books of a Sportsman and Naturalist
    CH. XI. MODES OF REACHING THE COUNTY. 159 CHAPTER XL — Agriculture in Sutherlandshire Facilities of reaching the County — Caledonian Canal — Travelling in Sutherland — Inns, excellent management of—Lairg—Tongue—Durness —Scowrie—Inchnadamph—Inveran—Conclusion of Suther- landshire. I will now finish my sketches (hurried and im- perfect as they are) of Sutherlandshire by recom- mending my readers, who may wish for a week's enjoyment, to follow my example and travel round that there are few who would not derive county ; much pleasure and amusement by doing so. The agriculturist and improver of land would be in- terested by seeing the different stages of husbandry in the county, from the perfectly- cultivated farms and cattle of the southern parts, to the rude and primitive method of raising small crops of oats amongst the rocks of the north and north-west, where the ground is turned up by ancient and quaintly-shaped substitutes for spades—ploughing in at the being quite impracticable many places ; same time that about Tongue, near as it is to the extreme northern point of Britain, both the mode 160 TOUR IN SUTHERLAND. CH. XI. of cultivation and the crops would do credit to many a southern county of England. in The sheep, black cattle, ponies, etc., many in parts of the county, are not to be surpassed Britain. The naturalist, whether his tastes incline to botany, ornithology, or any other line of this of en- interesting pursuit, will find ample means his cabinets while I can riching ; safely promise the lover of fine and varied scenery a treat that would repay him for a far more difficult and weary journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc
    Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2019 Registered No.: SC213460 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Contents Page No. Directors and Other Information 1 Strategic Report 2 Corporate Governance Statement 12 Directors' Report 15 Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Strategic Report, the Directors' Report and the Financial 16 statements Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc 17 Profit and Loss Account 21 Balance Sheet 22 Statement of Changes in Equity 23 Cash Flow Statement 24 Notes on the Financial statements 25 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors and Other Information Directors Gregor Alexander (Chairman) Steven Kennedy (Resigned 07/09/18) Stuart Hogarth David Gardner (Resigned 31/01/19) Colin Nicol Dale Cargill Alistair Borthwick (Appointed 07/09/18, Resigned 28/06/19) Robert McDonald (Appointed 31/01/19) Rachel McEwen Katherine Marshall David Rutherford (Non-Executive Director) Gary Steel (Non-Executive Director) Registered office Inveralmond House 200 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 3AQ Secretary Mark McLaughlin Auditor KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants 319 St Vincent Street Glasgow G2 5AS Registered number SC213460 1 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Strategic Report The Strategic Report sets out the main trends and factors underlying the development and performance of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc (the “Company”) during the year ended 31 March 2019, as well as those matters which are likely to affect its future development and performance. The business, its objectives and strategy The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SSE plc (the “Group”).
    [Show full text]
  • Killin News Issue 45
    Every two months PRICE 30p KILLIN NEWS KILLIN & DISTRICT COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER Issue No. 45 July 1998 Festival Weekend is over for another year and Killin is once again - Our Village Comments from the various establishments hosting "Fringe" events were very favourable. Ralph Mercer of the Killin Hotel said they had an excellent weekend, figures were up on last year, the Hotel was full and there was no trouble. John Shuttleworth of The Coach House Hotel also had a good weekend and a very enjoyable Sunday afternoon session of Glasgow TMSA (Traditional Music and Song Association of Scotland) Chorus Cup. At the Bridge of Lochay Hotel, Margaret Ireland remarked on the popularity of the story teller of myths and legends. David McLeod, Manager of the much too hot in the Hall"; "The music were not available until the day before the Tighnabruaich Hotel commented that the was better on Sunday night compared Festival started! camera erected at the entrance to the Park with Saturday" (or vice versa depending was a great idea. John Mallinson, on personal taste); "If Tich Frier tunes his For me the highlights of the weekend Chairman of the Killin Traditional Music guitar strings one more time, I'll string were Ian Bruce on Saturday night (his & Dance Festival and Killin Initiative him up!". The general opinion was that singing - not his leather trousers - well pointed out that the camera was co- there should have been a reduction for maybe both!) and in total contrast, the funded by the police and the Festival children's concert tickets, the Pitlochry fabulous ladies of the Killin Cancer Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkett, Derek G
    SUBMISSION FROM DEREK G BIRKETT Security of Scotland’s Energy Supply Personal Introduction The author has had a lifetime of working experience in the electricity supply industry, retiring at the millenium after twenty years as a grid control engineer under both state and privatised operation. Previous experience on shift were on coal and hydro plant for a decade, with the CEGB and NofSHEB. A further decade was spent on project installation and commissioning at five power station locations across the UK of which two were coal and three nuclear including Dounreay PFR. The latter experience gave chartered status on a basis of an engineering degree from Leeds University. Upon retirement, commitment was given as a technical witness for two public inquiries opposing wind farm applications as well as being an independent witness at the strategic session of the Beauly/Denny public inquiry. In 2010 a book was published entitled ‘When will the Lights go out?’ leading to public presentations, three of which were held in London. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/917/0088330.pdf (page 72) Basic Principles As a commodity electricity cannot be stored to any degree and must therefore be produced on demand. As an essential service to modern society its provision is highly dependent upon a narrow field of specialised technical expertise. The unified GB Grid is a dynamic entity, inherently unstable. Transmission interconnection of various supply sources provide security and enable significant capital and operational savings. However bulk transmission of power brings power losses, mitigated by siting generation in proximity to consumer demand. Maintaining system balance on a continual basis is critical for system security, not just with active power but also reactive power that enables voltage (pressure) levels to be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Financial Report
    Annual Report Part II/II Sven 2008 Financial Report Monica Dimitrii Isabelle 2008 Financial Report E.ON E.ON Group Financial Highlights Financial Calendar € in millions 2008 2007 +/- % Electricity sales (billion kWh) 614.6 487.0 +26 Gas sales (billion kWh) 1,224.0 1,092.3 +12 Sales 86,753 68,731 +26 Adjusted EBITDA 13,385 12,450 +8 May 6, 2009 2009 Annual Shareholders Meeting Adjusted EBIT 9,878 9,208 +7 May 7, 2009 Dividend Payout Net income 1,604 7,724 -79 Net income attributable to shareholders of E.ON AG 1,266 7,204 -82 May 13, 2009 Interim Report: January – March 2009 Adjusted net income 5,598 5,115 +9 Economic investments 26,236 12,456 +111 August 12, 2009 Interim Report: January – June 2009 Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations 6,738 8,726 -23 November 11, 2009 Interim Report: January – September 2009 Economic net debt (at year-end) -44,946 -23,432 -21,5141 Pro forma debt factor2 3.2 1.9 +1.31 Equity 38,427 55,130 -30 March 10, 2010 Release of 2009 Annual Report Total assets 157,045 137,294 +14 ROCE (%) 12.9 14.5 -1.63 May 6, 2010 2010 Annual Shareholders Meeting Pretax cost of capital (%) 9.1 9.1 – After-tax cost of capital (%) 6.7 6.1 +0.63 May 7, 2010 Dividend Payout Value added 2,902 3,417 -15 May 11, 2010 Interim Report: January – March 2010 Employees (at year-end) 93,538 87,815 +7 Earnings per share4, 5 () 0.68 3.69 -82 August 11, 2010 Interim Report: January – June 2010 Equity per share4, 5 () 18.10 26.06 -31 November 10, 2010 Interim Report: January – September 2010 Dividend per share5 () 1.50 1.37 +9.5 Dividend payout 2,857 2,560 +12 Market capitalization6 ( in billions) 54.2 92.0 -41 1Change in absolute terms.
    [Show full text]
  • *** DRAFT ** Sustainable Development and CO2 Capture and Storage
    *** DRAFT ** Sustainable Development and CO2 Capture and Storage A report for UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Prepared by Dr Paul Freund 31 August 2007 Executive Summary The threat of climate change and the importance of fossil fuels in global energy supply have recently stimulated much interest in CO2 capture and storage (CCS). The most important application of CO2 capture would be in power generation, the sector which is responsible for 75% of global CO2 emissions from large stationary industrial sources. Two options for capture are based on well established technology - post-combustion capture using chemical solvent scrubbing would be used in current designs of power stations; pre-combustion capture using physical solvent separation involves a small modification to the design of gasification based systems which are increasingly being considered for future power plants. A third approach, oxyfuel combustion, has not yet been demonstrated at full scale but several pilot plants are under construction. Captured CO2 would be transported by pipeline to storage in geological formations – this might be in disused oil or gas fields or in deep saline aquifers. Use of the CO2 to enhance oil or gas production offers the possibility of generating some income to offset part of the cost of CCS. CCS increases the energy used for power generation by about 25-50% and reduces emissions by about 85%. The levelized cost of electricity generation would be increased by between 40% and 90% depending on the design of the plant and type of fuel. There is sufficient capacity worldwide for CO2 storage to make a substantial contribution to reducing global emissions, although the capacity is not distributed evenly.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Electrify Scranton with Welsh Pride Festival Registrations
    Periodicals Postage PAID at Basking Ridge, NJ The North American Welsh Newspaper® Papur Bro Cymry Gogledd America™ Incorporating Y DRYCH™ © 2011 NINNAU Publications, 11 Post Terrace, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920-2498 Vol. 37, No. 4 July-August 2012 NAFOW Mildred Bangert is Honored Festival Registrations Demand by NINNAU & Y DRYCH Mildred Bangert has dedicated a lifetime to promote Calls for Additional Facilities Welsh culture and to serve her local community. Now that she is retiring from her long held position as Curator of the By Will Fanning Welsh-American Heritage Museum she was instrumental SpringHill Suites by Marriott has been selected as in creating, this newspaper recognizes her public service additional Overflow Hotel for the 2012 North by designating her Recipient of the 2012 NINNAU American Festival of Wales (NAFOW) in Scranton, CITATION. Read below about her accomplishments. Pennsylvania. (Picture on page 3.) This brand new Marriott property, opening mid-June, is located in the nearby Montage Mountain area and just Welsh-American Heritage 10 minutes by car or shuttle bus (5 miles via Interstate 81) from the Hilton Scranton and Conference Center, the Museum Curator Retires Festival Headquarters Hotel. By Jeanne Jones Jindra Modern, comfortable guest suites, with sleeping, work- ing and sitting areas, offer a seamless blend of style and After serving as curator of the function along with luxurious bedding, a microwave, Welsh-American Heritage for mini-fridge, large work desk, free high-speed Internet nearly forty years, Mildred access and spa-like bathroom. Jenkins Bangert has announced Guest suites are $129 per night (plus tax) and are avail- her retirement.
    [Show full text]
  • EFDA-JET Bulletin
    EFDA-JET Bulletin JET Recent Results and Planning March 2006 On 23rd January 2006, the EFDA Associate Leader for JET Dr Jérôme Paméla presented the JET 2005 report and future programme in a seminar at the JET site. In his talk, Dr Paméla outlined the most recent news regarding fusion, the 2005 JET main events and scientific highlights, the 2006 JET programme, and planning beyond 2006. "2005 was a key year for fusion with the decision on siting ITER in Cadarache taken by the parties on 28 June 2005. India joined in November and ITER negotiations were completed in December 2005. The negotiation with Japan led to other projects being jointly prepared between the European Union and Japan, the so-called ‘Broader Approach’, a very good opportunity for faster development of fusion," stressed Dr Paméla. Some of the scientific results obtained at JET in 2005, which were outlined in the talk, are presented in this Bulletin. The current European fusion research strategy, reflected in the longer-term planning for JET, was also described in detail. In the upcoming campaigns significant enhancement of the JET facility, towards higher power with the ITER-like plasma shape will allow JET to perform important experiments in preparation of ITER. At the end of this year, an ITER-like ICRH Antenna is to be installed which will open new scope for reactor-relevant research at JET. These experiments shall be followed by the installation of an ITER-like first wall scheduled for 2008 (see the June 2005 JET Bulletin). JET in the Physics World The March issue of the Institue of Physics magazine, Physics World, carries an 8 page special feature on JET.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]