In This Unit, Students Learn How to Classify and Identify Arthropods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In This Unit, Students Learn How to Classify and Identify Arthropods In this unit, students learn how to classify and identify arthropods. Students examine the similarites and differences between creatures with which they are familiar in order to develop an understanding of arthropod classification. They will use the seven major categores of classification (Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family and Genus). Biodivesity, Scientific Classification (Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family and Genus), Plants, Adaptation, Ecosystems, Growing Seasons, Models, Organisms. Use physical characteristics of various plant specimens to classify them. Identify rules for classification of plants. Apply seven major cate- gories of classification. Determine the reasons why scientists classify plants and animals. Determine relationships between plants and their local ecosys- tems—considering growing seasons, rainfall, temperatures, other creatures in the system and other critical elements they identify. Demonstrate understanding of major concepts with final portfolio project. contents at a glance T E A C H E R S T R AT E GIES RE A D INGS This timeline offers a day-by-day plan for CE N T E R F O R B I O D I V E RSITY AND CONSER- using all the components in the unit, including VAT IO N R EA DINGS suggestions for supplementary readings, dis- http://research.amnh.org/biodiversity/center/n cussion questions, homework assignments and ewsletter/webletter.html readings for further study. Assessment strate- gies include portfolio assessment and day-to- "W hat's the Buzz? The Bee Workshop at the day accountability for students working both So u t h western Research Station." Spring, 200 0 . individually and in small groups. "The Invertebrate Laboratory: Bugs Under Glass." Fall, 1999. AC T I V I T I ES "The Little Known World Underfoot." Summer, 1999. Prepare Your Investigation: Identification & Classification "Butterfly and Moth Workshop." Fall, 1998. Students use their prior knowledge of classifi- cation to frame their investigation of scientific I N T E R V IEW WITH SCIE N T IS T S classification systems. They learn seven major Profile: Barrett Klein categories of classification (Kingdom, Phylum, Barrett Klein, a display maker at the Ame r i c a n Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species) and Museum of Natural History (AMNH), describes apply those categories to organisms whose his path to entomology, which began with a love common names they know. of art. Research on the Web: Identify & Classify Profile: Sally Goodman Insects Sally Goodman, Curatorial Assistant at the Students conduct Web research to examine AMNH, describes her discovery that her artistic common and scientific names, images and skills could find a place in the Museum's descriptions of insects in every insect order. Entomology Department. They investigate a classification key (including Profile: Eric Quinter images of insects, once identified) for insects Eric Quinter, Senior Scientific Assistant in that feed on tomato plants. In the process, they AMNH's Entomology Department, describes learn about how scientists identify insects the influence of his countryside boyhood on his using a classification key. decision to become an entomologist. Quinter stresses the excitement of new discoveries, and Classroom Activity: Name That Critter the possibility for even amateurs to discover Students work cooperatively to investigate a new species. group of "mystery creatures" in order to discov- er the shared characteristics of arthropods. Profile: Kefyn Catley They may then use their discoveries to create Kefyn Catley, National Science Foundation mystery entries for a jeopardy game in which Research Fellow at AMNH's Entomology teams compete to identify arthropods. Department, describes his roundabout route into science after a long music career. Classroom Activity: Arthropod Jeopardy Students use their research on arthropods to design questions for a class Jeopardy game. This activity can be adapted for use with any unit in the Explore Biodiversity curriculum. contents at a glance RE A D INGS CO N T E N T R EA DINGS “Arthropods at a Glance” This overview of arthropods includes a discussion of their physical fea- tures and a list of some of the more common arthropods. SUPP L EME N TAL REFERENCES: Arthropod Related Web Sites www.insects.org/entophiles/index.htm This site has great images of insects listed by order and includes a sec- tion of other arthropods. http://ucmp.berkeley.edu/arthropoda/arthropoda.htm http://ag.arizona.edu//tree/eukaryotes/animals/arthropoda/arthropo- da.htm Take a look at a tree that shows the relationships of all living things. t e a cher strategi e s NA T I ON A L S T A N D A R DS t e a cher strategi e s T I ME L I NE This is a suggested timeline for the unit So Many Kinds of Creatures: Learning to Classify. This timeline is designed for classes with 45–55 minute-periods. The timeline uses all components in the unit; pick and choose to customize your unit if you wish. Suggestions are made here for using the readings; you can also give out the readings at the beginning of the unit, along with the portfolio sheet, and tell students that they are responsible for complet- ing the readings on their own time by the port- folio due date. If possible, return collected group worksheets and other assignments the day after they are completed, or, in the case of group work, on the next day that groups meet. The unit, and each individual activity within it, is designed to encourage the development of habits of mind. Students not only learn how the physical characteristics of arthropods can inform the ways in which they are classified; they also develop their skills in scientific inquiry by examining what they already know to frame an investigation, developing hypothe- ses and designing tests for those hypotheses. Readings supplement hands-on investigations, and students record their observations and findings in research journals before preparing a final project. This final project corresponds to the publication stage of scientific research. Suggestions for structuring this final project are found on the student handout, Putting It All Together. t e a cher strategi e s T I ME L I NE B E F ORE DAY 1 Before you begin the unit, ask students to answer “Questions to Explore” from the first section of Prepare Your Investigation: Identification & Classification. This is an excellent homework assignment for the night before or as an in-class activity before starting the unit. Ask students to read "What's the Buzz: The Bee Workshop at the Southwestern Research Station" and "The Invertebrate Laboratory: Bugs Under Glass" and write a response for each. DAY 1: Prepare Your Inve s t i g a t i o n Each unit in the Explore Biodiversity curriculum includes cooperative learning activities, some of which may be adjusted for individual work at home or in class. Keep in mind that many students do not yet know how to work effectively in groups. Spend some time discussing effective coopera- tive learning before you ask students to work cooperatively. If you are using only one unit in the curriculum, begin the first day with a writing task that asks students to think about effective group work, e.g.: When you are working with other students, what makes you want to par- ticipate? What makes you feel reluctant to participate? How do you help your teammates take part in discussion? What might you do that could make it difficult for others to participate? Ask a few students to share their written responses in order to generate a discussion of effective cooperative learning practices before starting the group activity. If you are using more than one unit in the curriculum, you will not need to repeat this discussion with each new unit, though some or all of your stu- dents may need refresher discussions as you proceed. Substitute the follow- ing writing task to help your students prepare for the activity to come: How do you know that a coat is a coat and a sweater is a sweater? As students write, circulate and either collect homework (responses) or sim- ply mark that students have completed the assignment and reserve a more detailed check for a journal collection date. Ask a few students to share their writing responses. Use their ideas to open a discussion about the way we classify things. Students then complete the second portion of Prepare Your Investigation: Identification & Classification. After groups have completed the activity, gather together as a class. Create a class list of key classification concepts and terms. HOME WORK : Read Profile: Barrett Klein and Profile: Sally Goodman and write a response for each. t e a cher strategi e s T I ME L I NE DAY 2: Research on the We b If all of your students have access to the Web, use Research on the Web: Identify & Classify Insects as an out-of-class assignment, with or without groups/partners. If not, use class time for students to use the interactive program. As you circulate, either collect homework (responses) or simply mark that students have completed the assignment and reserve a more detailed check for the portfolio collection date. Regroup as a class after the Web investigation to discuss the day's findings and to generate a class list of findings. HOME WORK : Read Profile: Eric Quinter and Profile: Kefyn Cateley and write a response for each. DAY 3: Classroom Ac t i v i t y No t e: You may need to provide field guides, textbooks or other resources for this activity. Decide in advance if you want students to depend on prior knowledge or to conduct research in order to complete Classroom Activity: Name That Critter. Make sure that your preparations don't give away the discovery point of the activity, where students realize that shrimp and spi- ders and ants and crabs are all part of the same phylum.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKAENAustralian Journal of Entomology1326-67562005 Australian Entomological Society 200544257278Original ArticleRevision of ScotocymaO Schmidt Australian Journal of Entomology (2005) 44, 257–278 Revision of Scotocyma Turner (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae) Olga Schmidt Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstraße 21, D-81247, München, Germany. Abstract The Australasian genus Scotocyma Turner is revised, containing the species S. albinotata (Walker), S. legalis (Warren), S. asiatica Holloway, S. scotopepla Prout, stat. n., S. manusensis Prout, stat. n., S. mimula (Warren), stat. n. and S. miscix Prout. Scotocyma euryochra Turner, syn. n., S. idioschema Turner, syn. n., S. ischnophrica Turner, syn. n. and S. transfixa Turner, syn. n. are regarded as synonyms of S. albinotata. Four species are described as new: S. samoensis, sp. n., S. sumatrensis, sp. n., S. rutilimixta, sp. n. and S. longiuncus, sp. n. Lectotypes are designated for S. scotopepla, S. manusensis and S. miscix. All species are illustrated, and keys to species and distribution maps are provided. A phylogenetic analysis was performed to test the monophyly of the genus and to examine distribution patterns of the species. A biogeographical discussion is included. The tribal position of the genus is clarified and relationships to closely related genera are discussed. Key words Australasian region, biogeography, distribution patterns, geometrid moths, Melanesian island arcs, phylogenetics, taxonomy, Xanthorhoini. INTRODUCTION Since Turner (1922), there have been few reviews of the Australasian genera of Larentiinae. Craw (1986, 1987) revised The genus Scotocyma Turner (1904) belongs to the large sub- the New Zealand species of the genera Notoreas Meyrick and family Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The larentiine Helastia (Guenée). The Australian Anachloris Meyrick and moths have a worldwide distribution, with the highest species Australasian Chaetolopha Warren have been revised recently diversity in temperate regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotopteryx Kuznetzovi (Wardikian, 1957) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Larentiinae), a New Species for the Fauna of Iran and Turkey
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 61 (1): 135–139 July 2012 Scotopteryx kuznetzovi (Wardikian, 1957) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Larentiinae), a new species for the fauna of Iran and Turkey Hossein Rajaei Sh.* & Dieter Stüning Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany * Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. Scotopteryx kuznetzovi (Wardikian, 1957), a rare and habitually remarkable Larentiine species described from Armenia, is recorded for the first time from Iran and Turkey. Males from both countries are illustrated, the females be- ing still unknown. A redescription is given and diagnostic characters are presented. External features and genitalia are mainly compared with those of S. vicinaria hyrcanaria (Staudinger, 1892), described from northern Iran, and other taxa of the vicinaria species group which all have genitalia very similar to S. kuznetzovi. The taxonomic position of the lat- ter is briefly discussed. Key words. Scotopteryx kuznetzovi, redescription, new records, Iran, Turkey. INTRODUCTION Scotopteryx Hübner, 1825, a Larentiine genus belonging Material examined. 2 ♂: Basmendj [NW Iran, SE to the tribe Xanthorhoini Pierce, 1914, contains more than Tabriz], 15.10. [19]74, [leg.] Damanabi, gen. preps 1063 70 species which are distributed in the Palaearctic region & 1064/2010 H. Rajaei, Iran; coll. HMIM. 2 ♂: Ost Tür- from Europe to Far East Asia, in South Africa and South kei, Van, 2700 m, Güzeldere Pass, 28.9.1981, leg. P. Kuh- America (Parsons et al., 1999). Neither in the latter pub- na, gen. prep. 3074, P. Kuhna; 1 ♂: Turkey, Prov. Bitlis, lication nor in the updated list of the Geometridae of the Van Gölü, 19 km E of Ahlat, 1700 m, 42°34’ E, 38°46’ World (Scoble & Hausmann, 2007) Scotopteryx kuznet- N, 18.10.1993, leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions of Biodiversity: 2010-2014 Projects (Nsf15030
    Dimensions of Biodiversity 2010–2014 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROJECTS CO-FUNDED BY Introduction 4 Project Abstracts 2014 6 Project Updates 2013 32 Project Updates 2012 46 Project Updates 2011 60 Project Updates 2010 76 a FRONT COVER IMAGES f g h b c i k l j m n o p q r d e IMAGE CREDIT THIS PAGE FRONT COVER a Jon G. Sanders d Karen E. Sears f Anothny R. Ives k Karen E. Sears o Michael N. Dawson b E.M. Rivkina e Jenny Xiang g Piotr Łukasik l Ivan Prates p Jon G. Sanders c Klaus Nüsslein h Walter S. Judd m John Wertz & q Ryan McMinds & i Robert Brucker & Alicia Withrow Jerome Payet Seth Bordenstein n Fabian A. r Richard Lankau j Olle Pellmyr Michelangeli FIELD SITES Argentina France Singapore Australia French Guiana South Africa Bahamas French Polynesia Spain Belize Germany Sweden Bermuda Iceland Switzerland Bolivia Japan Tahiti Brazil Madagascar Taiwan Canada Malaysia Thailand China Mexico Trinidad Colombia Norway United States Costa Rica Palau United Kingdom Czech Republic Panama Venezuela Dominican Peru Labrador Sea Republic Philippines North Atlantic Ecuador Poland Ocean Finland Puerto Rico North Pacific Ocean Russia Saudi Arabia COLLABORATORS Argentina Finland Palau Australia France Panama Brazil Germany Peru Canada Guam Russia INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS Chile India South Africa China Brazil China Indonesia Sri Lanka (NSFC) (FAPESP) Colombia Japan Sweden Costa Rica Kenya United Ecuador Malaysia Kingdom Mexico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many NSF staff members, too numerous to We thank Mina Ta, Design Specialist, for her mention individually, assisted in the development important contributions to the abstract booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions of Biodiversity Nsf12053
    Dimensions of Biodiversity National Science Foundation Fiscal Year 2010 – 2011 Projects Blank page Table of Contents Introduction i Fiscal Year 2011 Projects 1 Fiscal Year 2010 Projects 27 [Abstracts updated: Fall 2011] Acknowledgements Many NSF staff members, too numerous to mention individually, assisted in the development and implementation of the Dimensions of Biodiversity competitions that resulted in the projects described herein. The Dimensions of Biodiversity investigators are thanked and congratulated for their creativity and achievements in the research and coordination activities that these exciting projects represent. Finally, we are grateful to Dr. Sean M. Watts and Dr. Sara Chun, AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellows, who were most helpful in strategic planning for Dimensions of Biodiversity, and the production of this abstract book. Introduction Earth is losing species more rapidly than scientists can understand the roles they play and how they function. With this species loss, humanity is forfeiting opportunities to understand the history of life, to better predict the future of the living world, and to make beneficial discoveries in the domains of food, fiber, fuel, pharmaceuticals, and bio-inspired innovation. The National Science Foundation (NSF) is now in the third year of the 10-year Dimensions of Biodiversity program to characterize the least-well-known aspects of the diversity of life on Earth. NSF funded 11 new projects in FY 2011 (including a second International Research Coordination Network award), bringing the total number of active projects to 27. Identifying species is just a first step in the journey of assessing the planet's biological diversity, but for many organisms even this step is far from complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 28 Autor(en)/Author(s): Huemer Peter, Morandini Carlo Artikel/Article: Chesias angeri Schawerda, 1919 stat. rev., a long neglected species from northern Italy (Geometridae) 167-175 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 28 (3/4): 167-175 167 Chesias angeri Schawerda, 1919 stat. rev., a long neglected species from northern Italy (Geometridae) ^ Peter Huemer ' & Carlo Morandini ' Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen, Feldstraße lia, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, Via Marangoni 39/41, 1-33100 Udine, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Chesias angeri Schawerda, 1919, has been discovered in north-eastern Italy (Friuli Venezia Giulia) for the first time since its description. The hitherto disputed species is characterized by an invariable unique pattern of the forewing and other external characters that differ from those of the related C. rufata (Fabricius, 1775). The male genitalia are very similar to those of C. rufata. However, the female genitalia exhibit significant differences and support separate specific status. Morphological characters of both species are figured. Zusammenfassung. Chesias angeri Schawerda, 1919, wurde erstmals seit ihrer Beschreibung in Nordostitalien (Friuli Venezia Giulia) wiederentdeckt. Die bisher umstrittene Art zeichnet sich gegenüber der nahe Verwandten C. rufata (Fabricius, 1775) durch konstante Zeichnungsunterschiede im Vorderflügel sowie weitere habituelle Merkmale aus. Die männlichen Genitalien sind jenen von C. rufata sehr ähnlich, jedoch finden sich in den Weibchen signifikante Differenzen, die einen separaten Artstatus belegen.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods Associated with Turf and Ornamentals
    The Diagnostic Process Arthropods Associated with Turf and Ornamentals Carol Sutherland, Extension Entomologist The relationships among plants, Basic Features of An Adult Insect insects and their relatives are extraor- dinarily complex, even in garden and Let’s begin by reviewing basic features of a common landscape situations. Some gardeners adult insect and introducing the subjects of molting fear insects, consider nearly all of them and metamorphosis. A brief study of five different as “pests,” and overreact to their pres- kinds of mouthparts on insects will show different ence. Others are not aware of the stressful conditions ways that insects get their food, and, for pests, cause that may make plants more susceptible to serious specific kinds of damage to plants that you’re certain pests for which we have few or no controls. There is a to see. Finally, we’ll consider how insects are named happy medium. and categorized as a background for the general field guides that follow. In this section, you will learn enough about the devel- opment and classification of arthropods (that is, in- An adult insect, such as a grasshopper, has these com- sects and their jointed-leg relatives) that you’ll be able mon features: to identify many common species, as well as appreci- ate their roles in your yard and garden. This knowl- • three body regions (head, thorax, abdomen) edge should dispel fears, while bolstering confidence • three pairs of legs (one pair per segment on thorax; about your plant and pest management decisions. no walking legs on abdomen) While many species are described in the insect field • two pairs of wings (on 2nd and 3rd segments of tho- guides below, many more are not listed in the inter- rax) ests of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide to Amazing Arthropods Grades 3-6
    Teacher's Guide to Amazing Arthropods Grades 3-6 Description: Eat or be eaten is the name of the game in this lesson about arthropods featuring museum specimens and real live invertebrates. Investigate the adaptations animals as diverse as millipedes and tarantulas use to obtain food or avoid becoming food in this hands-on class! Outcomes: Students will be able to explain the characteristics of arthropods and differentiate between three major types of arthropods: insects, crustaceans, and arachnids. Students will be able to identify adaptations and predict the function of different arthropod features based on their forms. Students will be able to assess the role of arthropods within an ecosystem. Connection to the Academy: The scientists at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University have been studying insects since the Academy was founded in 1812. The entomology department’s collection now contains over 3,500,000 specimens belonging to over 11,000 species. The Academy is also home to the Titian Peale Collection, the oldest-surviving collection of insects in the Americas containing two Mediterranean butterflies that were collected in the 1740s. Current entomology research at the Academy focuses on taxonomy, systematics, biogeography, and behavior of Orthoptera and Tipuloidea species, as well as the surveying of aquatic insects in Mongolia. Vocabulary Suggested Activities Before Your Visit Adaptation Arthropod Investigating Arthropods - Introduction: Scientists research the complexity of Invertebrate life organizing species diversity into a number of nested groups based on shared Exoskeleton or modified characteristics. For example, vertebrates (fish, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and mammals) have a backbone. Invertebrates are animals without Insect a backbone.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Report 2002
    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Taxonomic Approach to Resolving Some Difficult Questions in the Larentiinae of the Mediterranean Region (Lepidoptera, Geometridae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 101 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hausmann Axel Artikel/Article: An integrative taxonomic approach to resolving some difficult questions in the Larentiinae of the Mediterranean region (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). 73-97 © Münchner Ent. Ges., download www.biologiezentrum.at Mitt. Münch. Ent. Ges. 101 73-97 München, 15.10.2011 ISSN 0340-4943 An integrative taxonomic approach to resolving some difficult questions in the Larentiinae of the Mediterranean region (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) Axel HAUSMANN Abstract Some difficult problems in the taxonomy of Mediterranean Larentiinae are resolved by an integrative approach combining molecular and morphological methods. Six new species and one new subspecies are described: Xanthorhoe sardisjuncta sp. n. from Sardinia, Xanthorhoe pederi HAUSMANN & FRIEDRICH, sp. n. from Cyprus, Colostygia fezae sp. n. from Turkey, Coenotephria antonii sp. n. from southern Italy, Coenotephria florianii sp. n. from the Lebanon, Nebula carlae sp. n. from southern Italy, and Nebula ibericata fiumii ssp. n. from Sardinia. Euphyia vallantinaria (OBERTHÜR, 1890) is recorded as new for the European fauna, with vouchers collected in southern Spain. The taxon Larentia adlata STAUDINGER, 1895 is downgraded from species rank to synonymy of the East-Mediterranean species Mattia callidaria (JOANNIS, 1891). A lectotype is designated for Cidaria nebulata pirinica REISSER, 1936 from Bulgaria, simultaneously the taxon is raised from subspecies of Nebula nebulata (TREITSCHKE, 1828) to species rank. A neotype is designated for Larentia probaria HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1852 from Croatia. The taxon Cidaria salicata hangayi VOJNITS, 1986 (northern Iran), previously treated as subspecies of “Nebula salicata”, is sub- ordinated at subspecies rank under Coenotephria ablutaria (BOISDUVAL, 1840).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of the Pacific Northwest: Caterpillars and Adults
    Forest Health Technology Identification Enterprise Team of Caterpillars and Adults TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Forest FHTET-03-11 U.S. Department FHTET of Agriculture Service December 2003 he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ For Reprints, contact: Richard C. Reardon USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield Street Morgantown, WV 26505 (304) 285-1563 [email protected] Cover Photo Top left to bottom right: EPARGYREUS CLARUS, PAPILIO BAIRDII, LIMENITIS LORQUINI, GRAMMIA ORNATA, PHYLLODESMA AMERICANA, PAPILIO RUTULUS, PHYLLODESMA AMERICANA, ITAME COLATA, ATLIDES HALESUS, CHLOROSEA BANKSARIA, LOPHOCAMPA MACULATA, CISSEPS FULVICOLLIS, SYNAXIS FORMOSA, SPILOSOMA VIRGINICA, PAPILIO INDRA, CELASTRINA ARGIOLUS. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Xth ISTT Program
    Program Chairs George Kennedy (North Carolina State University) Diane Ullman (University of California, Davis) Organizing Committee Scott Adkins (United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service) Robert Kemerait (University of Georgia) Martha Mutschler (Cornell University) Naidu Rayapati (Washington State University) Dorith Rotenberg (Kansas State University) John Sherwood (University of Georgia) Anna Whitfield (Kansas State University) Scientific Advisory Committee Adriano Cavalleri (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brasil) Kleber del Claro (Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil) Thomas German (University of Wisconsin) Robert Gilbertson (University of California, Davis) Elliot Watanabe Kitajima (Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil) Richard Kormelink (Wageningen University) Gerald Moritz (Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg) Tatsuya Nagata (Universidade de Brasília, Brazil) Hanu Pappu (Washington State University) Denis Persley (Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Australia) Dick Peters (Wageningen University) Stuart Reitz (Oregon State University) Renato de Oliveira Resende (Universidade de Brasília) Desley Tree (Queensland Primary Industries Insect Collection, Australia) Massimo Turina (Institute of Plant Virology, Italy) Shyi-dong Yeh (National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan) Encouraging New Scholars of Thysanoptera and Tospoviruses Laurence Mound Fellows: The Laurence Mound Endowment for International Research on Thysanoptera and Tospoviruses was founded in September, 2005
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document for Northamptonshire
    Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document For Northamptonshire Stanwick Lakes. Photo by Sarah Gadd August 2015 Statutory status of the Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been prepared under the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (the “2004 Act”). The Biodiversity SPD is a statutory Local Development Document (LDD). It will cover the whole of Northamptonshire, but will be adopted by each Local Planning Authority as a statutory SPD. The Biodiversity SPD was prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (Statutory Instrument 2012 No. 767) (the “2012 Regulations”), which set out the minimum requirements for the preparation of an SPD. It is essential for these requirements to be met in order for this document to be classified as a statutory LDD, thereby supplementing statutory Local Plans. This SPD will supplement policies within the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy, adopted June 2008 and West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan (Part 1), adopted December 2014. It is also consistent with the draft North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031. The specific preparation process for the Biodiversity SPD is directed by 2012 Regulations 12-14 and 35. The process also needs to have regard to the relevant Statements of Community Involvement (SCI). ii Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Definitions 1 3. Legislation and policy base: key messages 2 4. A
    [Show full text]