DOCSLIB.ORG

Praxis, International Edition, 1973, No. 4.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Praxis, International Edition, 1973, No. 4.Pdf PRAXIS REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE EDITION INTERNATIONALE Comite de redaction Branko Bošnjak, Danko Grlić, Milan Kangrga, Veljko Korać, Andrija Krešić, Ivan Kuvačić, Mihailo Marković, Gajo Petrović, Svetozar Stojanović, Rudi Supek, Ljubomir Tadić, Predrag Vranicki, Miladin Životić Redacteurs en chef Veljko Korać et Gajo Petrović Secretaires de redaction Branko Despot et Nebojša Popov Redacteur technique Gvozden Flego Comite de soutien Kostas Axelos (Paris), Alfred J. Ayer (Oxford), Zygmund Baumann (Tel-Aviv), Norman Birnbaum (Amherst), Ernst Bloch (Tubingen), Thomas Bottomore (Brighton), Umberto Cerroni (Roma), Mladeri Caldarović (Zagreb), Robert S. Cohen (Boston), Veljko Cvjetičanin (Zagreb), Božidar Debenjak (Ljubljana), Mihailo Đurić (Beograd), Marvin Farber (Buffalo), Vladimir Filipović (Zagreb), Eugen Fink (Freiburg), Ivan Focht (Sarajevo), Erich Fromm (Mexico City), f Lucien Goldmann (Paris), Zagorka Golubović (Beograd), Andre Gorz (Paris), Jurgen Habermas (Starnberg), Erich Heintel (Wien), Agnes Heller (Budapest), Besim Ibrahimpašić (Sarajevo), Mitko llievski (Skopje), Leszek Kolakowski (Warszawa), Karel Kosik (Praha), Henri Lefebvre (Paris), f Georg Lukacs (Budapest), / Serge Mallet (Paris), Herbert Marcuse (San Diego), Enzo Pad (Milano), Howard L. Parsons (Bridgeport), David Riesman (Cam­ bridge, Mass.), Veljko Rus (Ljubljana), Abdulah Sarčević (Sara­ jevo), Ivan Varga (Budapest), Kurt H. Wolff (Newton, Mass.), Aldo Zanardo (Bologna). Editeurs HRVATSKO FILOZOFSKO DRUŠTVO SAVEZ FILOZOFSKIH DRUŠTAVA JUGOSLAVIJE L’edition internationale est imprimće par lTmprimerie: IBG — Tiskara »Zagreb« — Zagreb, Preradovićeva 21 PD A YIC REVUE philosophique I l \ / \ ^ I ^ EDITION INTERNATIONALE ZAGREB, 4e TRIMESTE 1973. 9*me ANNEE, No 4 MARXISME ET CONSCIENCE SOCIALE Svetozar Stojanović / From Post-revolutionary Dictatorship to Socialist D e m o crac y ......................................................311 Ivan Kuvačić / Middle Class Id e o lo g y ................................. 335 Zagorka Golubović / Why is Functionalism more Desirable in Present-day Yugoslavia than M arxism ...................357 COMPTES RENDUS ET NOTES Veljko Cvjetičanin / Ljubomir Tadić, Tradicija i revolucija (Tradition et revolution)..................................................... 369 Branko Bošnjak / Max Miiller, Erfahrung und Geschichte 375 Neven Sesardić / A. N. Prior, Objects of Thought .... 378 Blaženka Despot / Wolfgang Harich, Zur Kritik der revo- lutionaren Ungeduld .......................................................... 380 Jordan Jelić / Corrado Barberis, Gli operai-contadini 382 APPENDICE Index des auteurs, Praxis, Edition intemationale 1973 . 387 Index des titres et des auteurs, Praxis, Edition internatio- nale 1965—1973................................................................... 389 Forthcoming: PRAXIS, International Edition No. 1—2/1974 SOCIALISM AND THE BOURGEOIS WORLD (Papers reaad at the Xth Session of the Korčula Summer School) Contributions by Ernst Bloch, Rudi Supek, Predrag Vranicki, Veljko Korać, Jurgen Habermas, Gajo Petrović, Lucio Lom- bardo-Radice, Mihailo Marković, Ivan Kuvačić, Srđan Vrcan, Abraham Edel, Svetozar Stojanović, Stefan Morawski, Danko Grlić and others. APPENDIX Gajo Petrović: Three Philosophical Lenins Prema MIŠLJENJU Republičkog sekretarijata za prosvjetu, kulturu i fizičku kulturu broj 4849/1-1972 od 10. 11. 1972., časo­ pis »Praxis« je oslobođen plaćanja poreza na promet proizvoda. MARXISME ET CONSCIENCE SOCIALE j FROM POST-REVOLUTIONARY DICTATORSHIP TO SOCIALIST DEMOCRACY1 YUGOSLAV SOCIALISM AT THE CROSSROADS Svetozar Stojanović Beograd There in only one adequate word to describe the present social situation in Yugoslavia, and that word is crisis. For a long time now, the intellectuals of the Left, and, more recently, the leftist student movement, especially since 1968, have been dramatically drawing attention to the accumulating symptoms of the impending crisis. However, awareness of the crisis has become widespread only since the deterioration of the relationships between the Yu­ goslav nationalities (the most sensitive side of Yugoslav life) caused a kind of social neurosis. It is no longer possible to conceal the true state of affairs by verbal evasions or by well-known intellectual acrobatics, using the notion of the »transitional period.« This notion in itself does not say much, for every period is a transition between two others, one past and one future. The »only« question is what will the period toward which the transition is heading be like. The fatalistic op­ timism of our officials, so clearly exposed by the satirist’s aphorism »The past is constantly changing, but the future is fully certain«, has been discredited long ago. In fact, even some officials speak of the seriousness of the si­ tuation, and even of crisis. However, this is done with an attitude of peculiar objectivism, as if the crisis were a natural catastrophe in which they have taken no part and for which they share no responsibility. Nearly all of them remain »at the head« of the crisis, just as before they were »at the head« of stagnation, and before that, »at the head« of success. It is not difficult to foresee 1 A paper read at the International Korchula Summer School in August 1971. It was published in the Serbo-Croat edition of »Praxis« 3—4/1972. 311 that most of them will simply continue their attacks on radical Marxists who are resolute in exposing the sources of the crisis, rather than seek a genuine solution. 2. Stalinists also speak of the Yugoslav crisis. But in my opinion, the Yugoslav crisis is not the result of destalinization, but, on the contrary, its source lies in the unwillingness to be radical in this break with the past. The Stalinists have no reason to rejoice since their own system is in an even more hopeless predicament. One need not cite past examples to substantiate this point; there are more recent ones, e. g.f Poland (1971), and Czechoslovakia (1968). However, we must be on our guard against theoretical mono­ mania which is quite common in Yugoslavia. It should be empha­ sized that the suspending of destalinization, although essential, is only one (although essential) of several reasons for the crisis and cannot, therefore, provide a complete explanation. I should add that I am deliberately speaking of »destalinization« avoiding as much as possible the official euphemism »destatization«, because this latter term seems to lend itself to ideological mystifications, due to its abstract and non-historical character. Finally, I shall be speaking here only of the political dimension of the crisis; a full discussion would have to take into consideration the economic and moral dimensions as well. Without an adequate historical consciousness it is not possible to develop a sufficiently sharp social consciousness with regard to the present. We are, unfortunately, still far from possessing an adequate knowledge of the history of the Yugoslav Communist Party and the Yugoslav revolution. This is not simply an accident nor the result of sheer intellectual inability. It is instead the case of the dominant interest in the society imposing a limit on histo­ rical knowledge. It is to be hoped, never-the-less, that historians will be resolute enough to undertake a revision of the official picture of the history of the Yugoslav Communist Party and the Yugoslav revolution. The official version obscures the close connection between the Stalinist social organization adopted at the time of the taking over power and the Stalinist dimension of the Yugoslav Communist Party before and during the revolution. It is therefore necessary to investigate immediately the process of »Bolshevization« (the pe­ riod expression for Stalinization) of the Yugoslav Communist Party; sectarianism of the Party; the Party’s attitude towards the leftist intellectuals; the suppression of internal opposition to the Stalinization of the Party; the relationships between the Yugoslav Communists in the USSR, especially at the time of the Stalinist purges; the revolutionary terror during the war and after the victory. Until now, the primary concern of Marxists, both in Yugo­ slavia and throughout the world, has been the struggle with Sta­ lin’s cult. There have been very few serious studies of the charis­ 312 matic leaders and their role in socialist revolutions and in post- -revolutionary developments. Since the need for an investigation of this kind is evident, we may conclude that the lack of it is due to the power of charisma, rather than to intellectual incompetence. Stalin’s cult represented an immense material power and not a few Yugoslav communists, who were torn apart by a painful dilemma between two charismatic giants, were broken by it in 1948 and chose to follow the hierarchic principle, betraying the domestic for the international charisma. It may be said that until now the socialist revolutions have not been able to summon up the strength to treat their leaders only as human, and therefore, as limited beings. They have, in this respect completely failed, since they have in fact allowed their leaders to achieve unrestricted power. As Sartre said: »Human roles always have a reference to the future: to each of us they appear as tasks to be fullifilled, snares to be avoided, power to be exercised, etc.« (»The Question of Method«) Revolutionary leaders should be no exception, since they too, as long as they live, are a potential source of evil as well as good. Nevertheless, even during their lifetime their historical role is given a »definitive«
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Praxis, International Edition, 1969, No. 3-4.Pdf
    PRAXIS A PHILOSOPHICAL JOURNAL Editorial Board B r a n k o B o š n ja k , D a n k o G r l ić , M il a n K a n g r g a I v a n K u v a č ić , G a jo P e t r o v ić , R u d i S u p e k , P r e d r a g V r a n ic k i Editora-in-Chief G a jo P e t r o v ić a n d R u d i S u p e k Editorial Secretary B r a n k o D e s p o t Advisory Board K o sta s A x e l o s (Paris), A l f r e d J. A y e r (O xford), Z y g m u n d B a u ­ m a n n (Tel-Aviv), N o r m a n B ir n b a u m (Amherst), E r n s t B l o c h (Tubingen), T h o m a s B o t t o m o r e (Brighton), U m b e r t o C e r r o n i (Ro­ m a), M la d e n Č a l d a r o v ić (Z agreb), R o b e r t S. C o h e n (Boston), V e l jk o C v je t ič a n in (Z agreb), B o ž id a r D e b e n ja k (Ljubljana), Mi- h a il o Đ u r ić (Beograd), M a r v in F a r b e r (Buffalo), M u h a m e d F i l i- p o v ić (Sarajevo), V l a d im ir F il ip o v ić (Z agreb), E u g e n F in k (Frei­ burg), I v a n F o c h t (Sarajevo), E r ic h F r o m m (Mexico City), L u c ie n G o l d m a n n (Paris), A n d r e G o r z (Paris), J u r g e n H a b er m a s (F ran k ­ furt), E r ic h H e in t e l (W ien), A g n es H e l l e r (Budapest), B esim I brahimpašić (Sarajevo), M it k o I l ie v s k i (Skopje), L eszek K o l a - k o w s k i (Warszawa), V e l jk o K o r a ć (Beograd), K a r e l K o sik (Praha), A n d r ija K r e š ić (Beograd), H e n r i L e fe b v r e (Paris), G e o r g L u - ka cs (Budapest), S e r g e M a l l e t (Paris), H e r b e r t M a r c u s e (San Diego), M ih a il o M a r k o v ić (Beograd), V o jin M il ić (Beograd), E n zo P a c i (M ilano), H o w a r d L.
    [Show full text]
  • Reana Senjković
    cijena: 126,00 kn ISBN 978-953-6020-99-7 (IEF) ISBN 978-953-7963-40-8 (Srednja Europa) Ova e-knjiga je objavljena uz financijsku potporu Ministarstva kulture Republike Hrvatske ISBN 978-953-8089-26-8 © 2018. Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku, Zagreb, Hrvatska Reana Senjković Reana Senjković SVAKI DAN POBJEDA Svaki dan pobjeda KULTURA OMLADINSKIH RADNIH AKCIJA Urednica: Kultura omladinskih radnih akcija Tea Škokić Biblioteka: Nova etnografija (urednice: Marijana Hameršak, Antonija Zaradija Kiš, Maja Pasarić) Nakladnici: Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku Srednja Europa Za nakladnike: Ines Prica Damir Agičić Recenzenti: Maša Kolanović Andrea Matošević Lektura: Mateo Žagar Oblikovanje i grafička priprema: Vesna Beader Likovno rješenje korica: Havo-dizajn; crtež Pavla Burcara prema skulpturi “Omladinka” Miodraga Živkovića Tisak: Denona Objavljivanje knjige potpomoglo je Ministarstvo znanosti, obrazovanja i sporta RH ISBN 978-953-6020-99-7 (IEF) ISBN 978-953-7963-40-8 (Srednja Europa) CIP zapis dostupan u računalnome katalogu Nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u Zagrebu pod brojem 000930407 © 2016. Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku, Srednja Europa, Zagreb, Hrvatska Sva prava pridržana Zagreb, travanj 2016. Sadržaj Znamo li istinu o radnim akcijama? 7 1946–1951 17 Očima književnika 17 Samo dobro? 34 Očima stranaca 59 Sjećanja 86 Motivacija, mobilizacija, pobjeda 108 Kritika – samokritika 128 Odlazak u nepoznato 138 1958–1964 167 Tri romana 167 Rehabilitacija besprizornih 180 Novo lice akcija? 186 Ponovo mladi 198 1968–1987 219 Znanost na akciji 220 Zbog čega opet akcije? 224 Još jednom promjena 228 S ulice u društvo 234 Akcijaško samoupravljanje 238 Drugarstvo 240 O sličnim pothvatima 259 Zaključak 281 Literatura 325 Kazalo osobnih imena 343 Znamo li istinu o radnim akcijama? Fenomen radne akcije je veoma složen, polidimenzionalan, različito se ispoljava, malo je izučavan i kao da je zapostavljen od društvenih nauka.
    [Show full text]
  • The Praxis School's Marxist Humanism and Mihailo Marković's
    The Praxis School’s Marxist Humanism and Mihailo Marković’s Theory of Communication Christian Fuchs Fuchs, Christian. 2017. The Praxis School’s Marxist Humanism and Mihailo Marković’s Theory of Communication. Critique 45 (1-2): 159-182. Full version: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03017605.2016.1268456 Abstract <159:> Mihailo Marković (1923-2010) was one of the leading members of the Yugoslav Praxis Group. Among other topics, he worked on the theory of communication and dialectical meaning, which makes his approach relevant for a contemporary critical theory of communication. This paper asks: How did Mihailo Marković conceive of communication? Marković turned towards Serbian nationalism and became the Vice-President of the Serbian Socialist Party. Given that nationalism is a particular form of ideological communication, an ideological anti-praxis that communicates the principle of nationhood, a critical theory of communication also needs to engage with aspects of ideology and nationalism. This paper therefore also asks whether there is a nationalist potential in Marković’s theory in particular or even in Marxist humanism in general. For providing answers to these questions, the article revisits Yugoslav praxis philosophy, the concepts of praxis, communication, ideology and nationalism. It shows the importance of a full humanism and the pitfalls of truncated humanism in critical theory in general and the critical theory of communication in particular. Taking into account complete humanism, the paper introduces the concept of praxis communication. Keywords: praxis, praxis philosophy, Yugoslavia, Praxis School, Praxis Group, Mihailo Marković, critical theory of communication, Marxist theory, humanism, nationalism, ideology, praxis communication 1. Introduction The Praxis Group was a community of scholars in Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rituals and Repetitions: the Displacement of Context in Marina Abramović’S Seven Easy Pieces
    RITUALS AND REPETITIONS: THE DISPLACEMENT OF CONTEXT IN MARINA ABRAMOVIĆ’S SEVEN EASY PIECES by Milena Tomic B.F.A., York University, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Fine Arts – Art History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2008 © Milena Tomic, 2008 Abstract This thesis considers Seven Easy Pieces, Marina Abramović’s 2005 cycle of re-performances at the Guggenheim Museum, as part of a broader effort to recuperate the art of the 1960s and 1970s. In re-creating canonical pieces known to her solely through fragmentary documentation, Abramović helped to bring into focus how performances by Joseph Beuys, Bruce Nauman, Gina Pane, Vito Acconci, Valie Export, and herself were being re-coded by the mediating institutions. Stressing the production of difference, my analysis revolves around two of the pieces in detail. First, the Deleuzian insight that repetition produces difference sheds light on the artist’s embellishment of her own Lips of Thomas (1975) with a series of Yugoslav partisan symbols. What follows is an examination of the enduring role of this iconography, exploring the 1970s Yugoslav context as well as the more recent phenomenon of “Balkan Art,” an exhibition trend drawing upon orientalizing discourse. While the very presence of these works in Tito’s Yugoslavia complicates the situation, I show how the transplanted vocabulary of body art may be read against the complex interweaving of official rhetoric and dissident activity. I focus on two distinct interpretations of Marxism: first, the official emphasis on discipline and the body as material producer, and second, the critique of the cult of personality as well as dissident notions about the role of practice in social transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sretenovic Dejan Red Horizon
    Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON EDITION Red Publications Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON AVANT-GARDE AND REVOLUTION IN YUGOSLAVIA 1919–1932 kuda.org NOVI SAD, 2020 The Social Revolution in Yugoslavia is the only thing that can bring about the catharsis of our people and of all the immorality of our political liberation. Oh, sacred struggle between the left and the right, on This Day and on the Day of Judgment, I stand on the far left, the very far left. Be‑ cause, only a terrible cry against Nonsense can accelerate the whisper of a new Sense. It was with this paragraph that August Cesarec ended his manifesto ‘Two Orientations’, published in the second issue of the “bimonthly for all cultural problems” Plamen (Zagreb, 1919; 15 issues in total), which he co‑edited with Miroslav Krleža. With a strong dose of revolutionary euphoria and ex‑ pressionistic messianic pathos, the manifesto demonstrated the ideational and political platform of the magazine, founded by the two avant‑garde writers from Zagreb, activists of the left wing of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia, after the October Revolution and the First World War. It was the struggle between the two orientations, the world social revolution led by Bolshevik Russia on the one hand, and the world of bourgeois counter‑revolution led by the Entente Forces on the other, that was for Cesarec pivot‑ al in determining the future of Europe and mankind, and therefore also of the newly founded Kingdom of Serbs, Cro‑ ats and Slovenes (Kingdom of SCS), which had allied itself with the counter‑revolutionary bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphoses and Anamorphoses of 'On the Jewish Question' by Marx
    chapter 6 15 Theses about Communism and Yugoslavia, or the Two-Headed Janus of Emancipation through the State (Metamorphoses and Anamorphoses of ‘On the Jewish Question’ by Marx) In memory of my Praxis colleagues and comrades at the Faculty of Philos- ophy, Zagreb: Rudi Supek, Gajo Petrović, Branko Bošnjak, Predrag Vran- icki, Veljko Cvjetičanin, Milan Kangrga For Boris Buden, who fought for truth and justice ∵ 6.1 Introductory1 The State everywhere presupposes that reason has been realised. But in this very way it everywhere comes into contradiction between its ideal mission and its real preconditions. marx, 1844 ∵ 1 Footnotes don’t go well with Theses, I have avoided further ones, except for two afterthoughts. This goes for the apparatus too, so that from the large library on the subject treated here I have cited only the indispensable Kouvelakis and Zolo, also the best treatment of the polysemic minefield of civil society in Hegel that I found in Bobbio 143–50, 185–7, and passim, though I do not agree with his stance on Marx. On religion and the ‘reoccupation’ of its terrain I was much influenced not only by Marx but also by the tradition of Curtius, Löwith, and Blumenberg. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi: 10.1163/9789004325210_008 106 chapter 6 6.1.1 The Basis of Theses I have taken over the basic epistemological approach to people, the State, and emancipation from the first part of On the Jewish Question (Zur Judenfrage, publ. 1844, mew 1: 352–61) by Karl Marx. He counterposes – in the terms of his age, which at times do not correspond to today’s historical semantics – polit- ical and legal emancipation to complete emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Individualism. Two Tendencies Dismantling War Imagery in Croatian and Serbian Historical Novels of the 1960S
    SEEU Review Volume 14 Issue 2 DOI: 10.2478/seeur-2019-0016 PERFORMING INDIVIDUALISM. TWO TENDENCIES DISMANTLING WAR IMAGERY IN CROATIAN AND SERBIAN HISTORICAL NOVELS OF THE 1960S (KRSTO ŠPOLJAR, RANKO MARINKOVIĆ AND MATE RAOS, RADOMIR SMILJANIĆ) Maciej Czerwiński Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Filologii Słowiańskiej UJ ul. Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków [email protected] ABSTRACT The article aims at addressing the question of representations of World War Two in Croatian and Serbian literature that were subversive in the sense that they queried the legend not simply by rejecting communism and affirming nationalism, but by emphasizing the uncertainty and sensibility of the human beings, a typical modern reaction to violence and, in general, modernist topoi. In this article I will focus on modernist novelistic representations of the 1960s in which the uncertainty and instability of collective warrants are foregrounded. As a result a subversive meaning is produced which contradicts not only communism and revolution but more generally war as such, including the universal features of war such as confronting loneliness, love as an expression of an individual rather than a collective sense of existence, and the impossibility of a valid representation of past events. Key words: war literature, fiction, Croatian literature, Serbian literature, Yugoslav memory, modern novel 2 SEEU Review Volume 14 Issue 2 INTRODUCTION When speaking about World War Two and its representations in the literatures of Yugoslavia, one gets the immediate impression that the topic of the discussion would be the People’s Liberation Movement, Josip Broz Tito, the partisans, fascists, Germans and Italians, the Ustashas, Chetniks, black-and-white visions, total heroes and total enemies, great battles and the consummate victory of the revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Borislav Mikulić
    Poietic Notion of Practice and Its Cultural Context Praxis Philosophy in the Political, Theoretical and Artistic Turmoils in the 1960s1 221 Borislav MIKULIĆ Abstract: The aim of this essay is to present the philosophy of praxis as a theoretical medium which embodies the aspects of the high and popular cul- ture in the 1960s in Croatia and former Yugoslavia. The first part deals with the topic of the lack of references to praxis in the recent contribution to the ethnography of socialism and cultural studies as a symptom of scientific reduc- tionism; in the second part some arguments are presented for the relevance of philosophy in general and praxis in particular, as a (meta-)cultural form. The third part presents and comments the conflict regarding the theory of reflection, which has marked the thinking in different theoretical fields in the 1950s, and which became the foundational event for the praxis itself. The author is trying to provide a philosophically immanent political interpretation of the paradox that the philosophical/theoretical criticism of Stalinism leads philosophy to a direct conflict with the political apparatus in power which has itself carried out the same critique during dramatic political process in 1948. In the final part, the text points out, on the one hand, to the philosophical theorem of sponta- neity in art as a fundament of the praxis concept of autonomy of the subject, and on the other, to the striking lack of references, within the mainstream of praxis, to the avant-garde political conception of art of the EXAT 51 group from early 1950s; the text outlines the reasons for interpretation of this meta- theory of art as a political anticipation of praxis.
    [Show full text]
  • GAJO-PETROVIC-BOOK.Pdf
    GAJO PETROVIĆ – ČOVJEK I FILOZOF ZBORNIK RADOVA S KONFERENCIJE POVODOM 80. OBLJETNICE ROĐENJA GAJO PETROVIC BOOK.indb 1 5.6.2008 10:45:19 GAJO PETROVIĆ – čOVJEK I FILOZOF ZBORNIK RADOVA S KONFERENCIJE POVODOM 80. OBLJETNICE ROđENJA Izdavač Sveučilište u zagrebu Filozofski fakultet FF Press, Zagreb Za izdavača Miljenko Jurković Urednik Lino Veljak Recenzenti Rastko Močnik Nadežda čačinovič Lektura Asja Petrović (hrvatski) Damir Kalogjera (engleski) Grafička oprema Boris Bui Tisak CIP zapis dostupan u računalnom katalogu Nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u zagrebu pod brojem 669281. ISBN 978-953-175-293-0 Tiskanje ove knjige financijski je pomoglo Ministarstvo znanosti, obrazovanja i športa RH sadrzaj - gajo petrovic.indd 2 3.7.2008 10:32:01 Urednik Lino Veljak GAJO PETROVIĆ ČOVJEK I FILOZOF ZBORNIK RADOVA S KONFERENCIJE POVODOM 80. OBLJETNICE ROĐENJA Zagreb, 2008. GAJO PETROVIC BOOK.indb 3 5.6.2008 10:45:20 GAJO PETROVIC BOOK.indb 4 5.6.2008 10:45:20 SADRŽAJ Sadržaj 5 Uvod 7 I. Jűrgen Habermas: U spomen na Gaju Petrovića / Zum Gedenken an Gajo Petrović 11 Milan Kangrga: Sjećanja na prijatelja, druga i suradnika Gaju Petrovića 19 Ivan Kuvačić: Gajo Petrović kao student 23 Vlado Sruk: Nekoliko rečenica o Gaji Petroviću 27 Nebojša Popov: Gajo Petrović nije bio samo profesor 31 Goran Švob: Gajo Petrović kao logičar 43 Ante Lešaja: Gajo Petrović i Korčula 49 II. Gajo Sekulić: Gajo Petrović o toleranciji 65 Božidar Jakšić: «Praxis» Gaje Petrovića 85 Veselin Golubović: Čemu mislioci u oskudnom vremenu? 107 Slobodan Sadžakov: Gajo Petrović – Odgovornost intelektualca 111 Barbara Stamenković/Lino Veljak: Humanizam u djelu Gaje Petrovića 117 Gordana Škorić: Petrović i neki aspekti suvremene njemačke fi lozofi je 123 Mladen Labus: Mogućnost stvaralaštva u djelu Gaje Petrovića 137 Borislav Mikulić: Revolucija i intervencija.
    [Show full text]
  • Praxis, Student Protest, and Purposive Social Action: the Humanist Marxist Critique of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, 1964-1975
    PRAXIS, STUDENT PROTEST, AND PURPOSIVE SOCIAL ACTION: THE HUMANIST MARXIST CRITIQUE OF THE LEAGUE OF COMMUNISTS OF YUGOSLAVIA, 1964-1975 A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Sarah D. Žabić August 2010 Thesis written by Sarah D. Žabić B.A., Indiana University, 2000 M.A., Kent State University, 2010 Approved by ___________________________________ , Advisor Richard Steigmann-Gall, Ph.D. ___________________________________ , Chair, Department of History Kenneth J. Bindas, Ph.D. ___________________________________ , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John R.D. Stalvey, Ph.D. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I The Yugoslav Articulation of Humanist Marxism: The Praxis School ..................... 24 New Plurality in Socialist Discourse: An Ideological “Thaw” in the Early 1960s ... 31 The Praxis School Platform....................................................................................... 40 The Korčula Summer School..................................................................................... 60 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 64 CHAPTER II The “Red Choir” in Action: The Yugoslav Student Protest, June 1968...................
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of Critical Theory in the Former Yugoslavia
    Praxis Philosophy’s ’Older Sister‘ The Reception of Critical Theory in the Former Yugoslavia Marjan Ivković* Without any doubt, the former Yugoslavia was among the more fertile soils globally for the reception and flourishing of the tradition of Critical Theory over a span of several decades. Practically all major works by both the ‘first’- and ‘second-generation’ critical theorists were translated into Serbo-Croatian in the 1970s and 1980s. Not only were there translations of the most influential studies of Critical Theory’s history and theoretical legacy of that time (Martin Jay, Alfred Schmidt and Gian-Enrico Rusconi), there were also studies by local authors such as Simo Elaković’s Filozofija kao kritika društva (Philosophy as Critique of Society) and Žarko Puhovski’s Um i društvenost (Reason and Sociality). Contemporary Serbian political scientist Đorđe Pavićević remarks about Critical Theory in Yugoslavia that “this group of authors can perhaps be considered the most thoroughly covered area of scholarhip within political theory and philosophy in terms of both translations and original works up to the early 1990s” (2011: 51). Yet, throughout socialist times, the broad and differentiated reception of Critical Theory never really crossed the threshold of a truly original appropriation, whether it be attempts to elaborate existing perspectives in Critical Theory, modify them in light of particular socio-historical circumstances of the local context, or apply them as a research framework for the empirical study of society. The peculiarity
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Histriae 27, 2019, 1
    ACTA HISTRIAE 27, 2019, 1 UDK/UDC 94(05) ACTA HISTRIAE 27, 2019, 1, pp. 1-198 ISSN 1318-0185 UDK/UDC 94(05) ISSN 1318-0185 (Print) ISSN 2591-1767 (Online) Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko - Koper Società storica del Litorale - Capodistria ACTA HISTRIAE 27, 2019, 1 KOPER 2019 ACTA HISTRIAE • 27 • 2019 • 1 ISSN 1318-0185 (Tiskana izd.) UDK/UDC 94(05) Letnik 27, leto 2019, številka 1 ISSN 2591-1767 (Spletna izd.) Odgovorni urednik/ Direttore responsabile/ Darko Darovec Editor in Chief: Uredniški odbor/ Gorazd Bajc, Furio Bianco (IT), Flavij Bonin, Dragica Čeč, Lovorka Comitato di redazione/ Čoralić (HR), Darko Darovec, Marco Fincardi (IT), Darko Friš, Aleksej Board of Editors: Kalc, Borut Klabjan, John Martin (USA), Robert Matijašić (HR), Darja Mihelič, Edward Muir (USA), Egon Pelikan, Luciano Pezzolo (IT), Jože Pirjevec, Claudio Povolo (IT), Marijan Premović (MNE), Vida Rožac Darovec, Andrej Studen, Marta Verginella, Salvator Žitko Uredniki/Redattori/ Editors: Gorazd Bajc, Urška Lampe, Arnela Abdić Gostujoči uredniki/ Guest Editors: Goran Musić, Jure Ramšak, Mateja Režek Prevodi/Traduzioni/ Translations: Urška Lampe (slo.), Gorazd Bajc (it.), Petra Berlot (angl., it.), Jure Ramšak (slo.), Mateja Režek (slo.) Lektorji/Supervisione/ Language Editor: Urška Lampe (angl., slo.), Gorazd Bajc (it.), Arnela Abdić (angl.) Stavek/Composizione/ Typesetting: Založništvo PADRE d.o.o. Izdajatelj/Editore/ Published by: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko - Koper / Società storica del Litorale - Capodistria© / Inštitut IRRIS za raziskave, razvoj in strategije družbe, kulture in okolja / Institute IRRIS for Research, Development and Strategies of Society, Culture and Environment / Istituto IRRIS di ricerca, sviluppo e strategie della società, cultura e ambiente© Sedež/Sede/Address: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko, SI-6000 Koper-Capodistria, Garibaldijeva 18 / Via Garibaldi 18 e-mail: [email protected]; www.zdjp.si Tisk/Stampa/Print: Založništvo PADRE d.o.o.
    [Show full text]