DOCSLIB.ORG

— Special Report —

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
— Special Report — FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION — SPECIAL REPORT — 11/19/2020 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION Publisher: Warsaw Institute Wilcza St. 9 00-538 Warsaw, Poland +48 22 417 63 15 www.warsawinstitute.org [email protected] Authors: Grzegorz Kuczyński – Director of Eurasia Program, Warsaw Institute Jędrzej Duszyński – Executive Assistant, Warsaw Institute Editor: Maciej Śmigiel Translation and proofreading: Paweł Andrejczuk Typesetting and formatting: Dariusz Ligęza –L.STUDIO Front page photo: Pexels/Artem Podrez The opinions and positions presented in this publication reflect the views of the authors only. © Warsaw Institute 2020 2 Special Report www.warsawinstitute.org FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION: THE BEGINNING AND THE END (?) 5 ROUND TABLE ON BELARUS: REPORT ON THE DEBATE 13 #BelarusAlert REVOLUTION DAY BY DAY 16 AUTHORS 59 www.warsawinstitute.org Special Report 3 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION INTRODUCTION On August 9, 2020, Belarus held a fraudulent presidential election, which was officially won by Alexander Lukashenko, who has been ruling the country since 1994. Even taking into account the whole spectrum of anti-democratic actions characterizing the regime in Minsk, it could be said that it was a kind of a break- through moment, after which the Belarusian society has said “enough.” This was additionally influenced by the economic situation of the country and disappoint- ment with the actions of the authorities against the coronavirus pandemic. The Belarusian people decided to express their dissatisfaction by protesting on a scale which was unprecedented in the history of this country, at the same time attracting the attention of the whole world. The Warsaw Institute Foundation, taking into account the historical and cultural heritage of Poland as well as the Central and Eastern Europe, actively supports all democratic movements in our part of the world. Guided by the spirit of solidarity with the Belarusian people, on August 24, 2020, i.e. after 15 days of protests, we launched a special program #BelarusAlert, which followed and described the situation in this country day by day. For the next 63 days we monitored current events, protests, reactions of the authorities and the international community up until October 27, 2020, the 78th day of the crisis and the failure to comply with the “ultimatum” issued by Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya – Lukashenko’s opponent in the presidential election. Furthermore, we devoted numerous events and debates to the Belarusian cause, the most important of which was the “Round Table on Belarus” organized on September 30, 2020 along with leading Polish think tanks. This Report is the outcome and conclusion of our activities to date. In addition to all the texts in the #BelarusAlert series and the report on the aforementioned debate, it also presents our assessment of the protests, the circumstances that led to them, Belarusian democratic changes as well as the future of Alexander Lukashenko and the whole country. 4 Special Report www.warsawinstitute.org FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION SOURCE: PEXELS/ARTEM PODREZ www.warsawinstitute.org Special Report 5 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION: THE BEGINNING AND THE END (?) Grzegorz Kuczyński ass protests following the rigged presidential type of regime that Lukashenko had been building M election turned out to be the largest opposi- since the mid-1990s. This model based on tacit ac- tion movement against the authorities in the history ceptance for his rule by the majority in exchange of independent Belarus. Although Alexander Luka- for a relatively low but stable standard of living and shenko continues to hold the reins of government, social security. Yet, it was the increasingly visible he lost legitimization and the majority of Belaru- inefficiency of the economic model (the so-called sians are against him. He is in power only thanks Lukanomics) as well as the catalysts – the coronavi- to the loyalty of the law enforcement as well as the rus pandemic and the government’s policy towards political and economic support of Russia. The post- this problem that caused social discontent. In fact, -election protests mark the definitive end of this the political crisis began even before the election. SOURCE: PEXELS/LINA KIVAKA 6 Special Report www.warsawinstitute.org FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION The beginning of the election campaign coincided use their presence and make accusations of prepara- with the spring wave of coronavirus. Lukashenko tions for the coup, indirectly indicating that Moscow absolutely ignored the pandemic. The policy of pre- was behind it. The president went all-in to force the tending that the virus does not exist did not mean Kremlin to determine the actual attitude towards that people did not contract it. As a result, the Bela- the events in Belarus. A short-term crisis ended with rusians, accustomed to the social model of the state, a telephone conversation between Lukashenko and suddenly felt abandoned by their country. Therefore, Putin, during which the Belarusian leader probably mass protests took on a different approach than heard that he does not have to fear Russia. It turned those following the previous election. The protesters out, however, that the elimination of Tikhanovsky of different political views, even those who were and Babaryka was not enough, although Luka- not interested in politics at all, were united by the shenko ignored the candidacy of the blogger’s wife, vision of Lukashenko’s departure. Unfortunately Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. Meanwhile, more than for the president, this great discontent found its way 60,000 people attended her rally in Minsk on July out on the street – precisely because of the election 30. The turnout at the meetings of the opposition campaign that had started. The first wake-up call for candidates must have deepened the concerns of the Lukashenko should have been the shockingly large regime because even before the election Lukashenko attendance at the rallies of people intending to run reshuffled cabinet and the heads of some law enfor- in the election, where signatures were collected on cement agencies – clearly preparing for the possible candidate endorsement lists. However, the regime large post-election protests. decided that it would be possible to neutralize this by using the methods that have worked in the past, i.e. not allowing some people to run at all and putting some people in jail on various charges. The latter In fact, the political crisis began affected three activists whom Lukashenko may even before the election. have considered the most dangerous rivals: Viktar Babaryka, Valery Tsepkalo and Sergei Tikhano- vsky. He saw all three of them, not without a reason, Of course, the way the election was conducted as potential candidates who certainly have good allowed for the falsification of its results – votes contacts in Moscow or could even be supported by it. could be cast from August 4 to August 8. On August It should be noted that another novelty of this year’s 7, the Central Election Commission announced that protests, besides their mass scale, was the positive the turnout had already exceeded 30 percent. The attitude of the activists, and especially their leaders, main election day was August 9. Five candidates towards Russia. Unlike in the previous years, the op- run for the office, but from the very beginning it position did not have a national character, which was was clear that only two of them matter: Lukashen- close to Belarusian nationalism, or a clear geopoliti- ko and Tsikhanouskaya. Officially, Lukashenko cal orientation (closer to the West, further away from received about 80 percent of the votes whilst Tsi- Russia). No wonder that almost until the end of the khanouskaya about 10 percent (with 84 percent campaign Lukashenko opted for the alleged Russian turnout). This meant that there was no need for the threat, not the Western one. The most significant second round of the election. Of course, everyone event was the detention of several dozen Russian expected the results to be rigged, but the scale of mercenaries in a sanatorium near Minsk on July support that Lukashenko allegedly received was 29, 2020. Presumably they were travelling through astonishingly large, it even looked like a provocation Belarus to one of the countries where the Wagner and only strengthened the protest. The regime was Group operates and the Belarusian services knew prepared for the demonstrations and in the first two about it very well. However, Lukashenko decided to days after the vote it tried to brutally suppress the www.warsawinstitute.org Special Report 7 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION SOURCE: FLICKR/NATALLIA RAK (CC BY-NC 2.0) protests. The scenario was supposed to be similar to the previous election when the authorities effec- The regime was prepared for the tively pacified protests in the largest cities, mainly in Minsk. However, this time it did not work. The demonstrations and in the first brutality of the militia mobilized people even two days after the vote it tried to more and after just a few days it turned out that the militia did not have the capability to disperse the brutally suppress the protests. crowds of thousands. What is more, the protests have proved to be widespread also in geographical terms. People took to the streets in small towns, phone calls between Lukashenko and Putin (August not only in western Belarus, but likewise in the 15-16) were crucial for the case. After them Russia regions adjacent to Russia, up to now perceived by declared its full support for the Belarusian regime, the regime as “safe.” It turned out that Lukashenko including the possibility of sending the forces of did not have enough forces to control the protests the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs to Belarus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • EP Resolution of 26 November 2020
    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition P9_TA-PROV(2020)0331 The continuous violations of human rights in Belarus, in particular the murder of Raman Bandarenka European Parliament resolution of 26 November 2020 on the continuous violations of human rights in Belarus, in particular the murder of Raman Bandarenka (2020/2882(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Belarus, in particular those of 17 September 2020 on the situation in Belarus1, of 4 October 2018 on the deterioration of media freedom in Belarus, notably the case of Charter 972, of 19 April 2018 on Belarus3, of 6 April 2017 on the situation in Belarus4, and of 24 November 2016 on the situation in Belarus5, – having regard to its recommendation of 21 October 2020 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on relations with Belarus6, – having regard to the European Parliament’s Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought 2020, which was awarded to the democratic opposition in Belarus on 22 October 2020, – having regard to the statement of the President of the European Parliament of 13 August 2020 and that of the leaders of the five political groups of 17 August 2020 on the situation in Belarus following the so-called presidential elections of 9 August 2020, – having regard to the European Council conclusions of 1 October 2020 and of 16 October 2020, and to the Council conclusions on Belarus of 12 October 2020, – having regard to the Council decision of 6 November 2020 to add 15 members of the Belarusian authorities, including Aliaksandr Lukashenka, to the list of sanctioned individuals, bringing the total number of Belarusians subject to a travel ban and asset 1 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0231.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Belarus
    Part 1. Histor ical Overview The Death Penalty in Belarus Vilnius 2016 1 The Death Penalty in Belarus The documentary book, “The Death Penalty in Belarus”, was prepared in the framework of the campaign, “Human Rights Defenders against the Death Penalty in Belarus”. The book contains information on the death penalty in Belarus from 1998 to 2016, as it was in 1998 when the mother of Ivan Famin, a man who was executed for someone else’s crimes, appealed to the Human Rights Center “Viasna”. Among the exclusive materials presented in this publication there is the historical review, “A History of The Death Penalty in Belarus”, prepared by Dzianis Martsinovich, and a large interview with a former head of remand prison No. 1 in Minsk, Aleh Alkayeu, under whose leadership about 150 executions were performed. This book is designed not only for human rights activists, but also for students and teachers of jurisprudence, and wide public. 2 Part 1. Histor ical Overview Life and Death The Death penalty. These words evoke different feelings and ideas in different people, including fair punishment, cruelty and callousness of the state, the cold steel of the headsman’s axe, civilized barbarism, pistol shots, horror and despair, revolutionary expediency, the guillotine with a basket where the severed heads roll, and many other things. Man has invented thousands of ways to kill his fellows, and his bizarre fantasy with the methods of execution is boundless. People even seem to show more humanness and rationalism in killing animals. After all, animals often kill one another. A well-known Belarusian artist Lionik Tarasevich grows hundreds of thoroughbred hens and roosters on his farm in the village of Validy in the Białystok district.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Human Rights
    FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY (CAYFIN) Delivery Address: th Mailing Address: 133 Elgin Ave, 4 Floor P.O. Box 1054 Government Administrative Building Grand Cayman KY1-1102 Grand Cayman CAYMAN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS Direct Tel No. (345) 244-2394 Tel No. (345) 945-6267 Fax No. (345) 945-6268 Email: [email protected] Financial Sanctions Notice 29/09/2020 Global Human Rights Introduction 1. The Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020 (S.I. 680/2020) (the Regulations) were made under the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (the Sanctions Act) and provide for the freezing of funds and economic resources of certain persons, entities or bodies responsible for or involved in serious violations of human rights. 2. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office have updated the UK Sanctions List on GOV.UK. This list includes details of all sanctions enacted under the Sanctions Act. A link to the UK Sanctions List can be found below. 3. Following the publication of the UK Sanctions List, information on the Consolidated List has been updated. Notice summary 4. 8 entries listed in the annex to this Notice have been added to the Consolidated List and are now subject to an asset freeze. 5. The identifying information for one individual has been updated and he remains subject to an asset freeze. What you must do 6. You must: i. check whether you maintain any accounts or hold any funds or economic resources for the persons set out in the Annex to this Notice; ii. freeze such accounts, and other funds or economic resources and any funds which are owned or controlled by persons set out in the Annex to the Notice; iii.
    [Show full text]
  • L319 I Official Journal
    Official Journal L 319 I of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Legislation 2 October 2020 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1387 of 2 October 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus . 1 DECISIONS ★ Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1388 of 2 October 2020 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus . 13 Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. EN The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. 2.10.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 319 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1387 of 2 October 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (1), and in particular Article 8a(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus. (2) On 9 August 2020, Belarus conducted presidential elections, which were found to be inconsistent with international standards and marred by repression of independent candidates and a brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in the wake of the elections.
    [Show full text]
  • English Online Exclusive January 2018
    President of the Syrian Arab Republic Bashar Assad (second from left), Russian President Vladimir Putin (center left), Russian minister of defense General of the Army Sergey Shoygu (second from right), and chief of the general staff of the Russian Federation armed forces General of the Army Valery Gerasimov (right) meet 21 November 2017 in Sochi, Russia, to discuss the closing phases of Russian support for operations in Syria. (Photo courtesy of Administration of the President of Russia) What Kind of Victory for Russia in Syria? Michael Kofman Matthew Rojansky, JD he war in Syria has ground on for more than to house them, while others have sought safety as far half a decade. Hundreds of thousands have away as Europe and North America, exacerbating died, entire cities and towns have been de- divisive battles over immigration, jobs, and cultural Tstroyed, and billions of dollars in infrastructure have identity in Western democracies. been decimated. Millions of refugees have flooded into Syria has tested every world leader individually and neighboring Middle Eastern states that can ill afford collectively, and has laid bare the failure of international 2 January 2018 MILITARY REVIEW ONLINE EXCLUSIVE VICTORY FOR RUSSIA? institutions to deal effectively with the problems those hardly the centerpiece of either state’s global strategy, institutions were designed to manage and prevent. or even their respective regional policies. Despite a prolonged commitment of U.S. military and Russian-Syrian relations draw on a Cold War legacy, diplomatic resources to the conflict, a peaceful settlement since Moscow first began to support Syria after the remains remote, and the bloody-handed Assad regime 1956 Suez Crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Rights-13-19.02.2021
    The information is aggregated from open source online resources and our own practice. In these newsletters, we will update you in brief on everyday human rights violations in numbers and facts. Summary: Saturday 13 February to Friday 19 February 2021 Human Rights Center “Viasna” reports that human rights activists have recognised 10 people as political prisoners. Nine of them were charged under articles of mass disorder; one was sentenced to four years in prison in a maximum security colony. In total, as of 19 February, 253 people in Belarus have been recognised as political prisoners. On 12 February 2021, Belarusian opposition Coordination Council member Maria Kolesnikova and her lawyer Maxim Znak, who have been imprisoned since September 2020, were charged with new offences, “Plotting to seize state power in an unconstitutional manner” and “Organising and controlling an extremist group”.1 Previously, Kolesnikova was ​ charged with “Publicly calling for actions threatening national security”.2 Alexander ​ Lukashenko’s key rival, Svetlana Tsikhanovskaya, as well as other exiled opposition leaders, including Pavel Latushko, Olga Kovalkovskaya, Sergey Dylevskiy, were charged under the same laws.3 ​ Marfa Rabkova, a well-known human rights defender from Human Rights Center “Viasna”, was charged with two more ‘extremist’ offences — “Inciting hatred or bias” and “Organising a criminal group or joining it”.4 Previously, Rabkova was charged with “Training and other ​ preparation of people to take part in mass riots, or financing such activities”.5 ​ The KGB added 17 Belarusians to the list of individuals involved in terrorist activities. All Belarusians added on 12 February 2021 to the updated KGB list are charged under Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Protests in Belarus (1994-2011) .Pdf
    Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources UPI "Belarus against Marks Russification of National Front of Independence 27 7 1994 Minsk 6500 0 Belarus Belarus Day" "the state's decision to discontinue eight [opposition] UPI "Belarussians 4 1 1995 Minsk 300 0 newspapers" protest press ban" " lower taxes, increase wages, create new jobs and enlarge AP "Thousands spending for health Rally In Minsk care, education Against Low Pay, 26 1 1995 Minsk 40000 0 and science." Unions Price Hikes" "introduction of teaching in the BBC World "Police Belarussian confiscate grenade language at higher at Belarussian educational Assembly of language 15 2 1995 unk 100 1 establishments," Belarussian Gentry demonstration" PAP News Wire Financing of "BELARUSSIAN construction of ASSOCIATION OF POLES DEMAND Polish language POLES IN POLISH SCHOOL 1 3 1995 Minsk 10 0 school BELARUS IN GRODNO" BBC World " Police arrest student activists Procession of for burning state 24 5 1995 Minsk 70 30 Uknown Political Convicts flag" ITAR-TASS "Minsk workers march on Police arrest presidential student activists residence in payment of back for burning state protest at wage 17 7 1995 Minsk . 0 wages flag arrears" AFP "Security forces arrest Minsk Minsk Metro metro strike 21 8 1995 Minsk 150 1 Metro strike Workers leaders" Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources Interfax "Belarusian Popular Front Reconsideration of protests against oil oil agreement with
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Who in Pakistan & Who Is Who in the World Study Material
    1 Who is Who in Pakistan Lists of Government Officials (former & current) Governor Generals of Pakistan: Sr. # Name Assumed Office Left Office 1 Muhammad Ali Jinnah 15 August 1947 11 September 1948 (died in office) 2 Sir Khawaja Nazimuddin September 1948 October 1951 3 Sir Ghulam Muhammad October 1951 August 1955 4 Iskander Mirza August 1955 (Acting) March 1956 October 1955 (full-time) First Cabinet of Pakistan: Pakistan came into being on August 14, 1947. Its first Governor General was Muhammad Ali Jinnah and First Prime Minister was Liaqat Ali Khan. Following is the list of the first cabinet of Pakistan. Sr. Name of Minister Ministry 1. Liaqat Ali Khan Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, Defence Minister, Minister for Commonwealth relations 2. Malik Ghulam Muhammad Finance Minister 3. Ibrahim Ismail Chundrigar Minister of trade , Industries & Construction 4. *Raja Ghuzanfar Ali Minister for Food, Agriculture, and Health 5. Sardar Abdul Rab Nishtar Transport, Communication Minister 6. Fazal-ul-Rehman Minister Interior, Education, and Information 7. Jogendra Nath Mandal Minister for Law & Labour *Raja Ghuzanfar’s portfolio was changed to Minister of Evacuee and Refugee Rehabilitation and the ministry for food and agriculture was given to Abdul Satar Pirzada • The first Chief Minister of Punjab was Nawab Iftikhar. • The first Chief Minister of NWFP was Abdul Qayum Khan. • The First Chief Minister of Sindh was Muhamad Ayub Khuro. • The First Chief Minister of Balochistan was Ataullah Mengal (1 May 1972), Balochistan acquired the status of the province in 1970. List of Former Prime Ministers of Pakistan 1. Liaquat Ali Khan (1896 – 1951) In Office: 14 August 1947 – 16 October 1951 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel, Macron Call Putin As Mass Strikes Escalate In
    ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ – ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ AA-AA ﭼﻮ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺪ ﺗﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒـــــــﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻳﮏ ﺗﻦ ﻣــــﺒﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺸﺘﻦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ www.afgazad.com [email protected] ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻬﺎی ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﯽ European Languages By Alex Lantier 20.08.2020 Merkel, Macron call Putin as mass strikes escalate in Belarus Strikes continue to spread across Belarus, after the disputed August 9 presidential elections and amid mounting anger at President Aleksandr Lukashenko’s disastrous handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This weekend, Belarus saw the largest demonstrations since the Stalinist bureaucracy restored capitalism and dissolved the Soviet Union in 1991. Around 200,000 people marched this weekend in the capital, Minsk, demanding Lukashenko’s resignation and denouncing police violence and mass arrests targeting protesters. The growing mobilization of the working class has alarmed the European bourgeoisie. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron both called Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday, before an extraordinary closed-door meeting of the European Council on Belarus today. Several state-owned factories joined the strike action yesterday, including the Belaruskali potash factory in Soligorsk. The world’s fifth-largest producer of the chemical, used to produce fertilizer, it earns a substantial portion of Belarus’ export earnings. State broadcasters also joined the strike, as well as the Kupalausky Theater in Minsk. Actors at the theater resigned en masse after the director, Pavel Latushko, was fired for siding with protesters. They were joining strikes, by Minsk transit workers and at auto and tractor factories as well as hospitals, that began on Monday amid calls for a nationwide general strike.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Regions and Regional Planning
    8. REGIONS AND REGIONAL PLANNING Spatial inequalities and regions at a glance The most sparsely populated area is Paliessie, which lies in the south. The only exceptions Whereas landscapes in Belarus change from within this area are the eastern and western gate- north to south (e.g. from the Belarusian Lakeland ways of Brest and Homieĺ, which are the admin- in the north to the Paliessie region in the south), istrative centres of the region. in terms of socio-economic development the Brest, which is the location of the largest country exhibits an east-west gradient as well border crossing in the west, is famous for its as regional differences that reflect centre-pe- fortress. The Bielaviežskaja Pušča National Park riphery disparities. Some of these inequalities near Brest is a World Heritage Nature Reserve. It can be traced back to the period when the coun- received this status as Europe’s largest primeval try’s western regions formed a part of Poland forest. The pride of the park is its population of (Kireenko, E.G. 2003). The east-west dichotomy bison. Brest is also renowned as the site of sever- is also apparent in the more industrialized nature al major historical treaties and events (the Brest of the eastern regions (Ioffe, G. 2004, 2006) and Union of 1596, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk of 1918, the richer cultural and architectural heritage of the defence of the Brest Fortress in 1941, and the western areas with their more favourable demo- graphics. Nevertheless, these differences are far less profound than those seen in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian Opposition Presidential Candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Today my country, Belarus, is in turmoil. Peaceful protesters are being illegally detained, beaten, and imprisoned. The protests themselves started after a cynical and blatant attempt by Mr. Lukashenko to steal the votes of the people. The demands of the nation are simple: immediate termination of violence and threats by the regime, immediate release of all political prisoners, and free and fair election. There is only one obstacle to these demands being met. This obstacle is Mr. Lukashenko, a man desperately clinging onto power and refusing to listen to his people and his own state officials. A nation can not and should not be a hostage to one man's thirst for power. And it won't. Belarusians have woken up. The point of no return has passed. This is manifested by now daily demonstrations of hundreds of thousands all across Belarus, despite police brutality and blatant disregard for Belarusian laws and international norms. This is manifested by the strikes across the largest factories and state-owned companies in Belarus, despite intimidation and in some cases unlawful layoffs. This is manifested by all the strata of our society and all the political spectrum demanding the one and the same thing. The regime of Alexander Lukashenko is morally bankrupt, legally questionable and simply untenable in the eyes of our nation. The United Nations was created as a formal body of the whole international community in order to promote and encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all. In 1945 Belarus was one of the founding members of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]